Sammy says it's shopping the new processor around to other handset manufacturers (like Meizu), noting that the Exynos 4 Quad is pin-to-pin compatible with the Exynos 4 Dual (the brains behind the Galaxy S II and Note), which gives designers the ability to update product designs with minimal costs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/25/samsung-announces-1-4ghz-exynos-4-quad-as-basis-for-galaxy-s3/
EDIT: Could it be that T-mo, Sprint, and Verizon were waiting for this? Should be interesting to see what is revealed May 3.
T-Mo's version is almost surely going to be a rebadged I717.
As to a Note Plus - I'd have to look through the I9100 update4 defconfigs again but no evidence of a Note Plus. However there's clear evidence of an S2 Plus - https://github.com/Entropy512/kernel_galaxys2_ics/blob/master/arch/arm/configs/s2plus_defconfig and also that one of the upcoming devices (identified as c1 - which USED to be the identifier for the Galaxy S II, but that was renamed to u1 with ICS) is for Verizon - https://github.com/Entropy512/kernel_galaxys2_ics/blob/master/arch/arm/configs/c1vzw_00_defconfig
Possible, I s'pose.
Didn't a few carriers receive Galaxy S "plus" iterations as recently as late 2011?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
rlaw said:
Possible, I s'pose.
Didn't a few carriers receive Galaxy S "plus" iterations as recently as late 2011?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, just altered versions. SGH-I777 and SPH-D710 were marketed as the Galaxy S II, the GT-I9100P was marketed as "Galaxy S II NFC" or maybe just as Galaxy S II.
LTE-enabled Qualcomm-based mangled devices were also released and had the Galaxy S II name applied:
SGH-I727 (Skyrocket)
SGH-T989 (not LTE, but 42 Mbps HSPA+ enabled - T-Mobile S II)
SGH-I717 (AT&T Note)
Nothing has been marketed as an "S II Plus" yet.
i wouldn't doubt it. its hard trying to stay updated with their latest devices. what have so many multiple versions? just create a phone that works around globe on all carriers. done.
rkick07 said:
i wouldn't doubt it. its hard trying to stay updated with their latest devices. what have so many multiple versions? just create a phone that works around globe on all carriers. done.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
North American carriers suck.
Well it could be the rumored Galaxy Journal, which I wouldn't mind since my work account is with Sprint, although carrying 2 Notes (one on Straight Talk and another on Sprint) would be weird.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Entropy512 said:
Nope, just altered versions. SGH-I777 and SPH-D710 were marketed as the Galaxy S II, the GT-I9100P was marketed as "Galaxy S II NFC" or maybe just as Galaxy S II.
LTE-enabled Qualcomm-based mangled devices were also released and had the Galaxy S II name applied:
SGH-I727 (Skyrocket)
SGH-T989 (not LTE, but 42 Mbps HSPA+ enabled - T-Mobile S II)
SGH-I717 (AT&T Note)
Nothing has been marketed as an "S II Plus" yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was referring to the i9001 and similar, Galaxy S Plus models - not the ones based on the S2.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Well, Samsung just announced a Galaxy S Advance, to replace their Galaxy S Plus.
I guess nothing is out of the question when it comes to iterating on their devices.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Related
What is differance between galaxy s2 and galaxy s2 4g
and why is galaxy s2 4g is cheaper than galaxy s2
relisys667 said:
What is differance between galaxy s2 and galaxy s2 4g
and why is galaxy s2 4g is cheaper than galaxy s2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No such thing as a galaxy s2 4g.
The Bell version is 4g.
Sent from my GT-I9100M using XDA App
xZeDgEx said:
The Bell version is 4g.
Sent from my GT-I9100M using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It calls itself 4G but is still 3.5G. The 4G iteration implements LTE, which is a different tech than HSPA(+). In Canada, LTE just means its going to be maybe a bit faster and definitely a bit(lot) more expensive. At the beginning, if you are in an LTE coverage area, you will notice less of a gap between theoretical max speed and actual speed, as there will be only a handful of users competing for bandwidth.
Edit: I do believe that the LTE iteration will not be the i9100, but something else (i910x), rendering it effectively a different phone altogether.
Galaxy Note Coming Soon Telus Network!!
Just saw that under coming soon on Telus.ca.
http://www.telusmobility.com/en/BC/samsung_galaxy_note/index.shtml
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
"With its massive 5.3” screen, LTE capable speeds and Android 2.3, the ultra portable Samsung Galaxy Note easily extends smartphone capabilities."
Lol... what are LTE capable speeds?
1.4 Ghz Exynos processor. It is a N7000.
I believe this is the lte Qualcomm snapdragon version. Same as at&t. Not the n7000.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
This isn't a snapdragon in its specs it says 1.4 ghz dual not 1.5 which already been confirmed to be the snapdragon. Reading more into the specs this version of the n7000 will work perfect for those who use T-Mobile/simple mobile 4g/3g speeds. So if you are a T-Mobile costumer and considering getting the sg note att or international this deserve a close look you lose the intergraded home button but keep the 1.4 exynos processor while gaining the 4g speeds
Well seems like the pnly difference is the 4 buttons. Everything else matches with international vetsion.
Telus didnt even listed it as LTE phone so fingers crossed for LTE....
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
gunem said:
This isn't a snapdragon in its specs it says 1.4 ghz dual not 1.5 which already been confirmed to be the snapdragon. Reading more into the specs this version of the n7000 will work perfect for those who use T-Mobile/simple mobile 4g/3g speeds. So if you are a T-Mobile costumer and considering getting the sg note att or international this deserve a close look you lose the intergraded home button but keep the 1.4 exynos processor while gaining the 4g speeds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. It's the same SGH-i717 that AT&T is getting, not the GT-N7000. There is no Exynos.
Well you should check details section. It does say Exynos.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
umar.ranjha said:
Well you should check details section. It does say Exynos.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you should realize that cut and paste marketing pages are notoriously inaccurate. Telus is getting the SGH-i717.
So yeh as the title says
Samsung have announced their galaxy tab 10.1 2.
And tbh, its a tad dissapointing.
Here's the tech radar link: http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/tablets/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-announced-1066429
Adam.
adamski123 said:
So yeh as the title says
Samsung have announced their galaxy tab 10.1 2.
And tbh, its a tad dissapointing.
Here's the tech radar link: http://www.techradar.com/news/mobile-computing/tablets/samsung-galaxy-tab-2-10-1-announced-1066429
Adam.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not the successor to the Galaxy Tab 10.1, its is the 10.1 inch version of the Galaxy Tab 2. Its just really confusing naming used.
It is a low/mid end device and the Galaxy Note 10.1 will be high end.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
tietherope said:
That is not the successor to the Galaxy Tab 10.1, its is the 10.1 inch version of the Galaxy Tab 2. Its just really confusing naming used.
It is a low/mid end device and the Galaxy Note 10.1 will be high end.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's just hope the galaxy note 10.1 comes with Samsung's Exynos quad-core chips
tietherope said:
That is not the successor to the Galaxy Tab 10.1, its is the 10.1 inch version of the Galaxy Tab 2. Its just really confusing naming used.
It is a low/mid end device and the Galaxy Note 10.1 will be high end.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The 10.1 is the 10.1 inch version of the Galaxy Tab, hence its called Galaxy Tab 10.1. The Tab 2 10.1 inch is the successor, not the Note 10.1".
Sent from my SGH-I897
Spartoi said:
The 10.1 is the 10.1 inch version of the Galaxy Tab, hence its called Galaxy Tab 10.1. The Tab 2 10.1 inch is the successor, not the Note 10.1".
Sent from my SGH-I897
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have a look here where it says "to go along with it's 7 inch sibling":
http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-announces-ice-cream-sandwich-powered-galaxy-tab-2-101-version
Or here:
http://www.theverge.com/2012/2/25/2824933/galaxy-tab-2-10-announced
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I think it has gsm calling functions that we miss but it lacks (gyroscope , flash in camera , 2mp front camera , and thicker and heavier ) , may be we could benifit from a port for its rom , it is packed with many useful apps
tietherope said:
Have a look here where it says "to go along with it's 7 inch sibling":
http://www.androidcentral.com/samsung-announces-ice-cream-sandwich-powered-galaxy-tab-2-101-version
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Point being?
Sent from my SGH-I897
Spartoi said:
Point being?
Sent from my SGH-I897
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe someone else can explain it in a way that I can't come up with right now.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
hoss_n2 said:
I think it has gsm calling functions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm kind of hoping this is the case but I cannot find any supporting information, albeit at this early stage. I suspect it may not, while GSM calling capabilities will be offered on the 10.1 Note as one point of differentiation, allowing Samsung to position the 10.1. Note somewhat above the new 10.1 Tab2?
Are there any details you have which lead you to believe GSM calling may be an option on the new 10.1 Tab2?
mabovalu said:
I'm kind of hoping this is the case but I cannot find any supporting information, albeit at this early stage. I suspect it may not, while GSM calling capabilities will be offered on the 10.1 Note as one point of differentiation, allowing Samsung to position the 10.1. Note somewhat above the new 10.1 Tab2?
Are there any details you have which lead you to believe GSM calling may be an option on the new 10.1 Tab2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only GSmarena is my source
If a forum full of us nerds (or half nerds) can't figure out Samsung's lineup then they are in a lot of trouble. The galaxy 2 10.1 is not our 10.1's successor. Its a 10" version of the new normal galaxy tab. I believe our tabs successor will be called so something else. The dual core 1ghz processor in the galaxy 2 seems like a step back. There's no way a fatter, slower version of our 10.1 can be the next iteration. But the fact that we have to argue about what is what does not bode well for their marketing strategy. Fix your **** Sammy.
Wallpaper
Here's a better question... Anyone know where the "water" wallpaper is on the screenshots? I'm digging it!
It's officially being called the "Galaxy Note 10.1"
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Here's proof...
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9224609/Samsung_Galaxy_Note_10.1_sighted_in_Barcelona_at_MWC
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Oops, I see I'm a bit late
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
hoss_n2 said:
Only GSmarena is my source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, thanks, I see that...
http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_tab_2_10_1-4567.php
"Tablet with support for GSM voice communication, SMS, and MMS."
That would represent a significant benefit over the original 3G Tab 10.1, so now I am wondering if there is new hardware in the Tab2, or maybe the Tab2 ICS ROM might somehow retroactively activate this feature in (3G) versions of the original Tab 10.1.
It's early, and these products have not even been officially launched but my understand now is that there are two new 10" tablet products:
1.) Tab2 10.1
2.) Note 10.1
How these are ultimately positioned with respect to each other, and any previous version(s), remains to be seen/heard, I guess.
tietherope said:
That is not the successor to the Galaxy Tab 10.1, its is the 10.1 inch version of the Galaxy Tab 2. Its just really confusing naming used.
It is a low/mid end device and the Galaxy Note 10.1 will be high end.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK so after seeing the Galaxy Note 10.1 it is not the successor to our Tab 10.1, but the the Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 certainly isn't either. I'm thinking they will have something new for us at their Galaxy SIII conference whenever that is.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
there goes my hopes for ICS in SG 10.1
Post on Samsung US Facebook page with link to press release. 5 major carriers beginning June.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
where is it?
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungUSA
Can't find it.
nevermind
https://www.facebook.com/SamsungMobileUSA
T-Mobile Announces Galaxy S III Retail Availability For June 21st
explodingboy70 said:
Post on Samsung US Facebook page with link to press release. 5 major carriers beginning June.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Sources tell me that it is not the first of June, but more on the 21st.
quad core?
The Samsung Galaxy S® III is optimized for peak performance on the nation’s fastest 4G LTE and HSPA+ networks, and will launch with AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon Wireless and U.S. Cellular.
Its says HSPA+, which equal non 4g right. Maybe quad core for some American carriers.
I think Samsung will make them Quad-Core all of them.
Also the designs will NOT be tampered like the past 2 Galaxy S Variants. We can probably guess that T-Mobile will be one of the better carriers to include it (highest selling) as the other carriers have iPhones and the release of the new one right around the corner will even out the GS3 sales.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
VeryCoolAlan said:
I think Samsung will make them Quad-Core all of them.
Also the designs will NOT be tampered like the past 2 Galaxy S Variants. We can probably guess that T-Mobile will be one of the better carriers to include it (highest selling) as the other carriers have iPhones and the release of the new one right around the corner will even out the GS3 sales.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually I'm pretty sure all the us versions are going to be dual core
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk 2
bfranklin1986 said:
Actually I'm pretty sure all the us versions are going to be dual core
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, sadly I'm thinking the same ^^;;
But on a main note....God I'm excited! Though, I'm already kinda missing my vibrant :'(
bfranklin1986 said:
Actually I'm pretty sure all the us versions are going to be dual core
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dunno if the variants are LTE compatible must be quad core.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
VeryCoolAlan said:
I dunno if the variants are LTE compatible must be quad core.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dual core for everyone
http://www.tmonews.com/2012/06/sams...or-five-us-carriers-begins-launching-in-june/
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk 2
I haven't heard anything about the Samsung Galaxy 3 S.A.F.E. edition which stands for Samsung Approved For Enterprise. Should be coming out very soon.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
awesomedeals88 said:
I haven't heard anything about the Samsung Galaxy 3 S.A.F.E. edition which stands for Samsung Approved For Enterprise. Should be coming out very soon.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The packaging says S.A.F.E at the back, so I'm assuming all devices have it (atleast the At&T ones).
awesomedeals88 said:
I haven't heard anything about the Samsung Galaxy 3 S.A.F.E. edition which stands for Samsung Approved For Enterprise. Should be coming out very soon.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Verizon version (at least) is S.A.F.E.
My Sprint one also has the S.A.F.E. logo on the box
att as well
T-Moble one says SAFE and Samsung Approved For Enterprise as well.
I have a T-Mobile Galaxy S III and the packaging has the S.A.F.E. logo and paper.
I believe SAFE was just a certified program Samsung announced after the phone's launch, but contains features already found in the phone.