Petition: team up and ask samsung-mobile for sourcecode
Help us to get needed sourcecode from samsung-mobile to get all hardware bits working on aosp based roms like cyanogenmod.
http://www.change.org/petitions/sam...t-achieve-full-potential-of-purchased-devices
thanks
Bump. This is important!
Sent from inside a black hole.
NOMIOMI said:
Petition: team up and ask samsung-mobile for sourcecode
Help us to get needed sourcecode from samsung-mobile to get all hardware bits working on aosp based roms like cyanogenmod.
http://www.change.org/petitions/sam...t-achieve-full-potential-of-purchased-devices
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We know about it mate...
Since Codeworks himself post it in CM9 thread N Original Development
eseregin said:
We know about it mate...
Since Codeworks himself post it in CM9 thread N Original Development
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but since his thread is closed so it doesn't stay up...therefore users tend to neglect it. So making this thread is a great idea in order to get the most signatures. Am I right?
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
signed. .
This is very important.
I signed it.
Signed
Sent from my GT-I9100T using Tapatalk
Signed...
But I dnt think it will happen
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Signed in hopes they release it.
Sent from my GT-I9100
NOMIOMI said:
Petition: team up and ask samsung-mobile for sourcecode
Help us to get needed sourcecode from samsung-mobile to get all hardware bits working on aosp based roms like cyanogenmod.
http://www.change.org/petitions/sam...t-achieve-full-potential-of-purchased-devices
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was already posted 2 days ago..
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1526939
Use search before duping topics.
Signed thank you.
Signed ............
signed hope they release it
It's not that simple. Samsung use binaries they are simply not allowed to release source for, due to IP rights and stuff of their respective owners.
These hardware designers have no duty nor intention to release source for their IP just because they're used in conjunction with an open source OS.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
Title should be "Please Every US Samsung User Read This"
Asks for country then zip code ? Dafuq?
We dont use zip codes, heck we dont even have a functional mail service.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Signed because this is important. And I don't think it's a bad idea to have a separate topic for this because not everyone lurks on the CM discussion/dev threads
NOT signed because this is really NOT important!
Samsung, will, I am sure, release what source code they can (for legal reasons, such as IP licensing) ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2.
They WON'T release the source code before that, as they are still changing the code and working on the features / bugs etc. to make ICS work on the SGS2.
No amount of b*tching from anyone will make a large multi-national like Samsung drastically change their development / release cycles *JUST* to keep a very small number of users happy.
... remember they're under NO OBLIGATION to release this source code in full... although I'm sure they will...
stuclark said:
NOT signed because this is really NOT important!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WTF it's wrong with you? Who are you to say that?
Just because something isn't important for YOU, it does not mean that it isn't important at all! (No offense, but people like you annoy me really bad)
stuclark said:
Samsung, will, I am sure, release what source code they can (for legal reasons, such as IP licensing) ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what we ask for. But "ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2" could mean anything from the same day till the same decade.
I hope you understand what I'm up to.
Protip: If you don't like the idea, stay out of the thread or, at least, don't post.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
TheSniperFan said:
WTF it's wrong with you? Who are you to say that?
Just because something isn't important for YOU, it does not mean that it isn't important at all! (No offense, but people like you annoy me really bad)
That's what we ask for. But "ONCE THEY RELEASE ICS for the SGS2" could mean anything from the same day till the same decade.
I hope you understand what I'm up to.
Protip: If you don't like the idea, stay out of the thread or, at least, don't post.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What you don't seem to grasp is that Samsung DOES release its code within the month of releasing an official ROM (Update1, 2 and 3 of the Gingerbread source being the prime example of this). They release the source they CAN release. The petition is to put pressure on them for the rest of the source code, which I agree with stuclark, is quite possible will not happen. I signed the petition just in case to give an extra number to a petition I don't believe will matter.
stuclark is entitled to his opinion, as you are, so let him post what he wants. He did not do it in a cruel manner or with horrible intentions. He is in his right to not sign if he does not believe. This is just like a friend of mine who got bullied by students because she didn't wanna sign a petition.
And he is right you know, 5200 users as opposed to the millions of phones that were sold... Is a VERY small portion of the SGS2 community.
karendar said:
stuclark is entitled to his opinion, as you are, so let him post what he wants. He did not do it in a cruel manner or with horrible intentions. He is in his right to not sign if he does not believe. This is just like a friend of mine who got bullied by students because she didn't wanna sign a petition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no problems when someone is entitled to his/her opinion.
BUT (s)he said that "it isn't important".
However, as there are people who sign this petition (or would, if they knew that it exists) it's BS.
(S)he should have said that it's not important in her/his opinion. That's quite a difference.
Your "argument" is nice too. The typical "you can't change anything anyway" argument.
Congratulations, if you think that way.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA
Related
Why kick a linuxnerd with this knowledge!!?
PsYCoR said:
Why kick a linuxnerd with this knowledge!!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where do we sign to get him back?
wait what happend?
nycbjr said:
wait what happend?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did he quit because of the HTCClay ordeal? If so All those folks went to rootzwiki.com
His kernel thread was closed due to a lack of source being provided, in order to keep the site compliant with the law. Some jerk took that to mean he was banned or punished or in some way unwelcome at XDA, which is false. The OP deserves a nice temp ban for having such a glaring attitude towards the administrators here at XDA who are doing their best to keep this site running. But, for someone with one post, I can't see that doing any good. Best to just ignore the troll till the admins remove this thread.
Out of all the worthless crappy 100+ threads you chose one that is actually useful WOW.
daveid said:
His kernel thread was closed due to a lack of source being provided, in order to keep the site compliant with the law.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can't belive it.
Johnny0906 said:
Out of all the worthless crappy 100+ threads you chose one that is actually useful WOW.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, but I LOLĀ“ed imagining you saying that. Anyway, that sucks =(
daveid said:
His kernel thread was closed due to a lack of source being provided, in order to keep the site compliant with the law.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That actually seems reasonably fair... Everyone is angry at Acer for doing that, I don't see why Thor should be held to a different standard. Having said that, his kernel was great... I hope he comes back and plays according to the rules.
With any luck this was all a big misunderstanding, and he just hadn't started a GIT yet but was about to, or something like that.
I mean his kernel was up a few days only, you couldnt have given him some more time to explain or something?
This is the guy that got Clockwork for EVERYBODY for ****s sake...
And its impossible to put a price tag on how important it is.
Johnny0906 said:
I mean his kernel was up a few days only, you couldnt have given him some more time to explain or something?
This is the guy that got Clockwork for EVERYBODY for ****s sake...
And its impossible to put a price tag on how important it is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We can only guess that PM's were being exchanged over the issue before any action was taken. At least, I HOPE they were. They wouldn't just boot him without talking first, would they?
FloatingFatMan said:
We can only guess that PM's were being exchanged over the issue before any action was taken. At least, I HOPE they were. They wouldn't just boot him without talking first, would they?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I say, let's just hope this was all a big misunderstanding. Thor was asked for his source a few times in that thread, and he never responded to those requests publicly. I don't know what happened behind the scenes though, as you say. Perhaps a mod can clarify?
Of course they would... They ban all the best devs over stupid $h*t. Android is "open source" but now we say he was banned for not including source? Thanks conan keep up the great work...
Sent from my My Touch 4G using XDA Premium App
Please let's get Thor and his work back !
Wtf is this s%%%???
First there's not even ONE mod to sticky the important threads and now some N00B comes to play sheriff in town and kick the DEV who brought CLOCKWORKMOD to ICONIA out?
Who the F%%% is this brilliant MOD???
WHY the F%%% don't you CLOSE ALL 3.1 topics and ask acer for a 3.1 source?
EVER HEARD OF ASKING? NICELY?
Thor was rebuilding his kernel from ground up anyway.
WTF? is this XDA OR CCCP?
Mod who bans = CONANTROUTMAN... Send all requests to him ;-)
Sent from my My Touch 4G using XDA Premium App
Please post the C&D if it REALLY was a legal thing
Seriously? Because he hasn't had time to post the source up? Really?
This isn't anything new even here on XDA, and as far as being legally compliant, show us the cease and desist order, please. In any event that's no cause to get a poster banned and XDA had plenty of occurrences on significantly less open platforms where they didn't ban the poster, but locked the content due to C&Ds.
Thor did significant amounts of work here to get us what we want. Acer and pretty much 100% of corporate industries are limited to what they can do or say because of much greater liability of what they produce. One user/fan/coder posting here not so much liability as none of it is anywhere near official.
So, again please post the C&D
Even if he was being a total jackass and blurted out obscenities AT mods, a temp ban would all that it would warrant.
CONANTROUTMAN banned him or CONANTROUTMAN is in charge of mods overdoing their job?
Who banned him?
This is crazy about one month ago we didn't have recovery, Then Thor arrived and fixed that he is very important to the development of the a 500, Lets hope this is temporary, Without devs like Thor we get nowhere on our devices, I have seen in the past when devs have fights with mods the devs leave for good. Its almost like they get jealous of the work they do.
Sent from my A500 using Tapatalk
In the official post for CyanogenMod 7 it says
"There are many devices still in beta status (Pyramid, Doubleshot, Shooter, HP Touchpad, Optimus 3D, several more) that we will be promoting to release or release-candidates in the next few weeks when the code is merged to our main branch."
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now this is purely speculation as the title says so if anyone gets disappointed when it doesn't happen.
Now i could be looking at this completely wrong so feel free to call me a dumb ass if i am wrong.
Source: http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/cyanogenmod-7-1-released
The CM7 project for the Atrix is not being developed by official Cyanogenmod. Just stay tuned to the google code page and follow twitter accounts.
SirFork said:
The CM7 project for the Atrix is not being developed by official Cyanogenmod. Just stay tuned to the google code page and follow twitter accounts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Once its in RC don't they give it to the official team for merging? that's what i thought happened from my understanding.
There are many devices still in beta status (Pyramid, Doubleshot, Shooter, HP Touchpad, Optimus 3D, several more) that we will be promoting to release or release-candidates in the next few weeks when the code is merged to our main branch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's from the official Cyanogenmod site, which has no affiliation with the development of CM7 for the Atrix.
Yeah, but the current team is responsible for making the atrix compatible with cm7 (thus, they're doing most of the work). Once that's done, they'll be giving it to the official team so they can support it.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I'm pretty sure the dev team has said all they need to do is get the fingerprint scanner and webtop working then they can submit it to cyanogen mod to try and get official status, since before cyanogen will accept any port it must not break any functionality that the stock rom had
thewarhawk said:
I'm pretty sure the dev team has said all they need to do is get the fingerprint scanner and webtop working then they can submit it to cyanogen mod to try and get official status, since before cyanogen will accept any port it must not break any functionality that the stock rom had
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The webtop might take a while since it seems they have to design their own version of it
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Exactly why this is such an ambitious effort. Some people might not have the fortitude (or the patience!) for this phone's technology to be fully realized. For me, I'm kind of excited to own such a unique device and hope the developers aren't discouraged by such a challenge.
SirFork said:
Exactly why this is such an ambitious effort. Some people might not have the fortitude (or the patience!) for this phone's technology to be fully realized. For me, I'm kind of excited to own such a unique device and hope the developers aren't discouraged by such a challenge.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the devs are more discouraged by the trolls.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
IUH1991 said:
I think the devs are more discouraged by the trolls.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is probably a huge factor along with the massive number of idiots who fail to read directions properly and end up with bootloops and blame the dev's for making faulty software.
I installed CM7 on my Atrix and now it's running too fast. I can't keep up with it. Also the benchmark scores are too high, and the battery lasts too long. Plz fix.
Phalanx7621 said:
I installed CM7 on my Atrix and now it's running too fast. I can't keep up with it. Also the benchmark scores are too high, and the battery lasts too long. Plz fix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
HaHa Good one!!!!
I think a lot of the trolls here are just ungrateful...they constantly complaining about things not work like they want them to work and they are constantly bugging the devs about when when when! These same trolls do not take a mere breath to stop and say thank you to the devs that work hard for free. No one has EVER promised them anything, but they complain like it is the devs duty to please them. Somedays I wish I were back in the Aria forum because the community was very helpful and the devs felt welcomed.
FYI good find OP!
lilhaiti said:
HaHa Good one!!!!
I think a lot of the trolls here are just ungrateful...they constantly complaining about things not work like they want them to work and they are constantly bugging the devs about when when when! These same trolls do not take a mere breath to stop and say thank you to the devs that work hard for free. No one has EVER promised them anything, but they complain like it is the devs duty to please them. Somedays I wish I were back in the Aria forum because the community was very helpful and the devs felt welcomed.
FYI good find OP!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Troll"
I don't think you know what that word actually means yet you use it constantly.
edgeicator said:
"Troll"
I don't think you know what that word actually means yet you use it constantly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's actually kinda explained in my post.
lilhaiti said:
It's actually kinda explained in my post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since you still don't realise what the word "troll" actually means, let me clarify for you.
A troll is someone who posts inflammatory extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
ie the very people you are complaining about are not, in fact, trying to provoke people, but rather are just uninformed people asking for help. In fact, you are the one closer to a troll then they are since you keep insulting them instead of directing them to the right answer, potentially provoking them into an outlash of anger.
IUH1991 said:
The webtop might take a while since it seems they have to design their own version of it
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly I don't think they'll be having Webtop on Cyanogenmod. Last I heard it was too much work.
if cm7 allowed me to play my movies from my phone on tv when i am away from home i would be on it like a fat kid on a smartie!
edgeicator said:
Since you still don't realise what the word "troll" actually means, let me clarify for you.
A troll is someone who posts inflammatory extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community, such as an online discussion forum, chat room, or blog, with the primary intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
ie the very people you are complaining about are not, in fact, trying to provoke people, but rather are just uninformed people asking for help. In fact, you are the one closer to a troll then they are since you keep insulting them instead of directing them to the right answer, potentially provoking them into an outlash of anger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nicely put...
Ratchet556 said:
Now this is purely speculation as the title says so if anyone gets disappointed when it doesn't happen.
Now i could be looking at this completely wrong so feel free to call me a dumb ass if i am wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dumbass....
sanriver12 said:
dumbass....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We dont sit here and update or post all day because its un needed, exhausting on its own, and frusterating to the point of cursing. I can once a week come to this thread and after going through 20+ pages find maybe one thing worth replying to, like this time and the gentleman that requested a few pages back that i call this kang and not official ?!? Why because we have waited till we deemed ready to merge ? Everything we released has been stable and useable i have not touched another rom in months, we will merge shortly, it will be up todate 2.3.7 or what ever uptodate is than. We are all running 2.3.7 curently , there has not been another release because IOO there has not been enough added fixes that we felt the need to do so yet. Mostly we have been waiting on FP. I have it working 100% fine actually better than stock, but it haz created a bug with calls when enabled for an unknown reason. I have been working on the same bug for over 2 weeks . Once again iwasted more time i could have spent on the bug to reply to those of you that felt i needed to "give updates" to a 170 page hell hole where no one reads in the first place Anyhow we appreciate your all excited , so are we , mostly so we can stop working keep in mind we want itcompleted and working obiously more than you do so either relax and wait or keep yelling inhere like a jakaninny IDGAF, but i will post updates when i am ready as will the other team members. End of story
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to ignore that for the soul fact I was right. From the CM7 thread.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
http://android.modaco.com/topic/348194-04-nov-icl23d-galaxy-nexus-boot-recovery-system-dump/
found it on android central
Idk if you read the post that you linked. It specifically asks not rehost the files. While we are in no obligation to follow requests from other forums its common courtesy to support other developers when they do so much for the community as a whole. Something to keep in mind...
Otherwise thanks for the link!
Jug6ernaut
i just thought the original host was horrible since you gotta wait 15 minutes between downloads unless you have an account. but alright, i wont rehost.
skeepon said:
i just thought the original host was horrible since you gotta wait 15 minutes between downloads unless you have an account. but alright, i wont rehost.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Much appreciated.
so what does this mean in terms of developers? (im a noob)
jug6ernaut said:
Obviously you did not read the post to which you linked. It specifically says to NOT rehost the files. While we are in no obligation to follow requests from other forums its common courtesy to support other developers when they do so much for the community as a whole. Something to keep in mind...
Otherwise thanks for the link!
Jug6ernaut
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Point of stating this is? Are you like an online mall cop?
Sent from my HTC Evo 3D using xda premium
Simer03 said:
so what does this mean in terms of developers? (im a noob)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means that porting ics to other devices should devices should be a lot easier. The more pieces we have the better a chance of it happening.
denson9874 said:
Point of stating this is? Are you like an online mall cop?
Sent from my HTC Evo 3D using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
(I'm assuming u don't know who your talking)
If u consider xda a mall, then yes I am lol. Still as I said, its a matter of courtesy. We are under no obligation to follow any request from other forums(that I'm aware of at least). I said something because paul is a huge figure as Android community goes and he deserves respect as does everyone. Android community is built on the backs of people liked him.
In comparison your post is pointless & if it want explicitly directed at me I would be removing it as it is unconstructive and is a direct attack (for lack of a better weird) on another user which is not tolerated. as it its I'll let it slide, but don't try and push it, I doubt another mod will do the same.
Jug6ernaut
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Rather than sit idly on the forums wondering what could have been and spouting mis-information I decided that I'd do something pro-active and create a petition detailing our need for Android 4.0 on the I9000 and I9001.
I'm sure this could come to something if people want it enough.
http://www.change.org/petitions/www...ndwich-version-for-users-of-the-samsung-i9000
We can't force Samsung to maintain support for our phone but we can damn well try.
I signed the petition!
I signed too
i signed it too.
as
change.org/petitions/wwwsamsungcom-distribution-of-ice-cream-sandwich-version-for-users-of-the-samsung-i9000#
This petition is beter!
Signed both - but true second petition seems to be more promising...
but keep up with such ideas!
greetz
I had no idea a petition already existed, I will promote the official one instead!
I've signed the second one.
IMHO, the OP should change the link for the second one if he doesn't want fragmentation...
signed
Sent using TCP/IP
done!
Good action, really
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Signed the official one.
me too.
http://www.youmobile.org/blogs/entr...lans-for-GALAXY-line-Galaxy-S-to-follow-later
Looks like you don't have to sign this anymore ) Don't know how much credible is youmobile.
Signed,
This thing needs to be shared, samsung cant force us out just yet just cus they want more money.
I think it was more than 10 000 000 Galaxy S devices sold. Leave us behind and loose the customer base.
t1mman said:
I've signed the second one.
IMHO, the OP should change the link for the second one if he doesn't want fragmentation...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did this as soon as I was aware of the official one.
I signed too
Moshon
dukuletz said:
http://www.youmobile.org/blogs/entr...lans-for-GALAXY-line-Galaxy-S-to-follow-later
Looks like you don't have to sign this anymore ) Don't know how much credible is youmobile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is just a copy of the official statement with one sentence added. The sentence that galaxy s would follow later.
From where are the sources? I doubt that whole text!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I have signed alreadey.
Signed!!!!!!!!!
I have signed both!
Please inform the devs so that they can spread this information to more users!!!
https://twitter.com/OnePlus_ITA/status/819200734067617792
I would really appreciate an early download link if anybody has one
Nice!
They are using it as an excuse to delay publishing their Nougat sources.
eddymonti said:
They are using it as an excuse to delay publishing their Nougat sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*lol* I'm afraid you're right...
And once funk wizard has it. He will be posting it.. Just sit back,chill and wait...
Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk
I've got a feeling it might be just a security patch for the bootloader vulnerability https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www....f-selinux-to-permissive-mode-in-fastboot/amp/
eddymonti said:
They are using it as an excuse to delay publishing their Nougat sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they're fixing a bootloader issue.
eddymonti said:
They are using it as an excuse to delay publishing their Nougat sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I really do think it's because the software is not finalized yet. It's not even world wide, I bet they're still trying to polish it before they release the kernel.
djsubterrain said:
No, they're fixing a bootloader issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
One doesn't exclude the other. I don't think the update carries just the bootloader fix. My point is, they are using it as an excuse to release sources after all updates are done (the more updates, the more time they gain with that excuse).
What they should be doing instead is releasing sources the moment binaries are out like any developer-friendly, and more importantly, GPL-abiding entity.
You think a dev would publish a kernel based on their sources, if they released it earlier, without correcting the vulnerability themselves? The xda article said (sultanxda) it could be fixed by just a letter change in all instances of a "word" xD.
Sent from my OnePlus3T using XDA Labs
eddymonti said:
One doesn't exclude the other. I don't think the update carries just the bootloader fix. My point is, they are using it as an excuse to release sources after all updates are done (the more updates, the more time they gain with that excuse).
What they should be doing instead is releasing sources the moment binaries are out like any developer-friendly, and more importantly, GPL-abiding entity.
You think a dev would publish a kernel based on their sources, if they released it earlier, without correcting the vulnerability themselves? The xda article said (sultanxda) it could be fixed by just a letter change in all instances of a "word" xD.
Sent from my OnePlus3T using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're probably trying to hide their poor/ broken code. Anyway, they're violating GPL by not releasing the source code. It's a poor move by OP whom I had hope for. This Nougat launch has been completely botched by them.
B3501 said:
They're probably trying to hide their poor/ broken code. Anyway, they're violating GPL by not releasing the source code. It's a poor move by OP whom I had hope for. This Nougat launch has been completely botched by them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So sue em. Aside from the handful of developers (rocking free OP phones) who cares.
jerrywmilton said:
So sue em. Aside from the handful of developers (rocking free OP phones) who cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you a OP employee or something? Without sources we can't get a proper TWRP or proper custom Roms and kernels.
How many normal phone users even know what TWRP or custom ROM is? They are happy when they get apps installed, that's all customization they do.
B3501 said:
Are you a OP employee or something? Without sources we can't get a proper TWRP or proper custom Roms and kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As if Carl Pei doesn't know this. Acting like it is some "grand plan" to screw over developers is ridiculous. While a day or week seems like eternity to developers, the sun still rises. OP no doubt read the huge XDA article calling them out yesterday so just chill.
jerrywmilton said:
So sue em. Aside from the handful of developers (rocking free OP phones) who cares.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a stupid question. People who frequent XDA and the likes, even the ones who are actually trying to learn development. That's who.
heiskanenej said:
How many normal phone users even know what TWRP or custom ROM is? They are happy when they get apps installed, that's all customization they do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhh... those same users are also likely to not know about XDA. Anyway, that question is irrelevan here.
Man, you apologists are something else.
Spasticdroid said:
What a stupid question. People who frequent XDA and the likes, even the ones who are actually trying to learn development. That's who.
Uhh... those same users are also likely to not know about XDA. Anyway, that question is irrelevan here.
Man, you apologists are something else.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As if there aren't already a multitude of ROMs one can load for the OP on XDA right now. I could install a different one every day of the week and not run out for a while. The article yesterday by XDA to OP was well put...They have nothing to gain but bad publicity for not releasing it, so they probably have good cause. Relax.
jerrywmilton said:
As if there aren't already a multitude of ROMs one can load for the OP on XDA right now. I could install a different one every day of the week and not run out for a while. The article yesterday by XDA to OP was well put...They have nothing to gain but bad publicity for not releasing it, so they probably have good cause. Relax.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes,and the Roms don't fully work properly, the camera isn't full quality because of no "N" blobs etc,etc.
jerrywmilton said:
As if Carl Pei doesn't know this. Acting like it is some "grand plan" to screw over developers is ridiculous. While a day or week seems like eternity to developers, the sun still rises. OP no doubt read the huge XDA article calling them out yesterday so just chill.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK. Got your point - but 2 1/2 week? If you don't want to publish your code at the same time you publish your ready compiled product, don't base it on code under GPLv2. Period. BTW: Do you know, that Carl Pei commited OnePlus to zero-day source-code pushes? Considering this, you should accept our insisting on N sources.