Difference between 4.0.3 and 4.0.4 - Nexus S General

whats the difference?

I think a few bug fixes as normal with a 0.0.x update
Sent from my ice cream powered Nexus S

Yea that's what I thought. I guess its not really worth switching rooms since it probably won't make a noticeable difference
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App

Here is a little bit more information:
Android 4.0.4 Makes Another Surprise Appearance

Apparently Google is still working on 4.0.4. JBQ (the AOSP maintainer) says that 4.0.4 is too buggy to be released to AOSP.

bozzykid said:
Apparently Google is still working on 4.0.4. JBQ (the AOSP maintainer) says that 4.0.4 is too buggy to be released to AOSP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you have a source for that?

https://twitter.com/#!/jbqueru/status/169630329668239360

4.0.4 owwwwwwnnnnnsss 4.0.4 by a long shot. Def worth the upgrade
Sent using Tapatalk, you know, the free version.

id have to agree with the buggy bit
it drained about 70% of my battery
on a 14 minute call
and twice went from about 50%
to 0 [shut off] after i'd gone to bed
[less than 5 hours...]
i do have bad coverage at the house...
fwiw

Using 4.04 IMM26. 0 bugs noticed. Really A LOT faster and better battery life than Cyanogenmod 9 that I had before...

andrewt328 said:
whats the difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check my ROM link, but in short, you'll see a boost in Javascript performance, RAM performance, and another little bonus is the Android OS battery stats bug is gone.
kernels ; battery ; ROM ; gov/sched

renna1992 said:
Here is a little bit more information:
Android 4.0.4 Makes Another Surprise Appearance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This link gives an idea about what you get with 4.0.4 but it is mainly for Galaxy Nexus (and for the Nexus S 4g). It is not official though. Just a leak with some few bugs. The 4.0.4 based ROMs in the dev section are just tweaked (ported) from this leak to work on nexus S and you won't get all the benefits listed in that link. For our Nexus S, google is preparing a 4.0.5 version similar to the 4.0.4 for the nexus 4G. The release date would be around middle march according to the latest news.

4.0.3 had one big issue for me - browser was too laggy and slow.
4.0.4 completely resolved that problem

Related

ics

is there any etas or a estamet on the ics update from actual cymod or samsung
CM 9 http://lmgtfy.com/?q=galaxy+tab+10.1+ics
Samsung http://lmgtfy.com/?q=galaxy+tab+10.1+samsung+ics
i mean the offical ones
You could check one of the many threads already talking about it.
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda premium
samwest39 said:
is there any etas or a estamet on the ics update from actual cymod or samsung
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep Samsung released ICS on the Google Nexus. If you want update from cymod, check the dev forums. All the info is there.
As of right now, there is no official ETA on Cyanogenmod9 (ICS) although from looking at their latest work (Nightly Builds, they are close. They will have to go through some Betas and then a RC (Release Candidate,) but even the Alphas are in a very good state. Usually by the time it is in Beta, CM is in a daily-driver condition.
As for Samsung's official ICS rom, the company has committed to bringing ICS to the entire Galaxy Tab line in Q1 of 2012, which means in the first 3 months of the year (Jan, Feb, March) Bear in mind that there is the possibility that they will miss that deadline due to unforseen bugs and isssues, so they may end up delivering in Q2, which would still put them on track for their initial promise of the first half of the year.
Hi everyone
I am pretty new to all this stuff with the tabs. I am running tasks 13.1 ROM with pershoots latest kerrnel.
Does anyone know what advantages or what ics has offer.
My tab is running great now but i am still very curious about ics
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
AUSTAB2012 said:
Hi everyone
I am pretty new to all this stuff with the tabs. I am running tasks 13.1 ROM with pershoots latest kerrnel.
Does anyone know what advantages or what ics has offer.
My tab is running great now but i am still very curious about ics
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The tab is much much faster with ICS and the general performance is better. For example theres no lag when using the appswitcher.
Some things aren't working yet (Camera, native VPN) but since a few days even hardware-accelerated video is working. Just do a nandroid backup and try it out, it runs REALLY great! I would never go back
Some useful links to get a feeling for whats new:
Android 4.0 Highlights (SDK Platform preview)
Android 4.0 - Official Site
Galaxy Tab WIFI CM9 KANG - Preview ROM of CM9
Isilmalith said:
The tab is much much faster with ICS and the general performance is better. For example theres no lag when using the appswitcher.
Some things aren't working yet (Camera, native VPN) but since a few days even hardware-accelerated video is working. Just do a nandroid backup and try it out, it runs REALLY great! I would never go back
Some useful links to get a feeling for whats new:
Android 4.0 Highlights (SDK Platform preview)
Android 4.0 - Official Site
Galaxy Tab WIFI CM9 KANG - Preview ROM of CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree the Kang release is good enough to use every day. IMO Honeycomb is rubbish and this rom is way better
ICS is to HoneyComb what Windows 7 is to Vista
just plain better!
t1mman said:
ICS is to HoneyComb what Windows 7 is to Vista
just plain better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL +1
10char
Does ICS make it faster?
I just picked up a 10.1 and am very dissapointed with its performance. Very laggy and not a great user experience.
Before I sell it or put too much effort into it, do any of the ICS builds make a noticeable improvement in the over all performance? Or is it just a better UI?
Honeycomb is downright awful IMO, and I would rather have GB stretched out on this thing given the inconsistency of HC. I know ICS will address some of those concerns, but if it doesn't also bring with it a performance improvement I think I will sell this thing.
Thanks for your input!
BJNK said:
Before I sell it or put too much effort into it, do any of the ICS builds make a noticeable improvement in the over all performance? Or is it just a better UI?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS is much better than HC, not just the UI. At the moment, there's still a few things that don't work (camera, for example). But don't take my word, try it, it will only take a few minutes and then you decide if it's good enough.
you can get immediate and excellent performance by just going to GalaxyTask custom ROM - ICS is even more smoother
BJNK said:
I just picked up a 10.1 and am very dissapointed with its performance. Very laggy and not a great user experience.
Before I sell it or put too much effort into it, do any of the ICS builds make a noticeable improvement in the over all performance? Or is it just a better UI?
Honeycomb is downright awful IMO, and I would rather have GB stretched out on this thing given the inconsistency of HC. I know ICS will address some of those concerns, but if it doesn't also bring with it a performance improvement I think I will sell this thing.
Thanks for your input!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info, both of you!
I have the 3G version so GalaxyTask is out. Any other recommendations?
animatechnica said:
you can get immediate and excellent performance by just going to GalaxyTask custom ROM - ICS is even more smoother
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
BJNK said:
Thanks for the info, both of you!
I have the 3G version so GalaxyTask is out. Any other recommendations?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try the ICS 3G Rom from Mobalito: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1461240
Compared to the stock honeycomb that comes with the 10.1, this is night and day. Performance on stock honeycomb was a JOKE. Lagged like my HTC Hero. Same day as I bought the pad I installed this ICS ROM and it's been awesome ever since. Only need the camera working now!
You wont be dissapointed. This is a great piece of hardware, but shipped with unoptimized software. Flash your own software in and you'll love it!
Even going to a custom 3.2 rom will give a lot of speed and responsivness. 3.1 is realy realy not the best rom to put on a device and help "selling" the thing!
I've been running Galaxy Task Slim 13.1 and it's realy better than stock 3.1. I haven't tryed the stock 3.2 yet though, that might be a performance jump also!
I too agree. After the switch to the ICS there is no way to revert back to the old HC version. This despite the lack of the camera and the VPN......
Isilmalith said:
The tab is much much faster with ICS and the general performance is better. For example theres no lag when using the appswitcher.
Some things aren't working yet (Camera, native VPN) but since a few days even hardware-accelerated video is working. Just do a nandroid backup and try it out, it runs REALLY great! I would never go back
Some useful links to get a feeling for whats new:
Android 4.0 Highlights (SDK Platform preview)
Android 4.0 - Official Site
Galaxy Tab WIFI CM9 KANG - Preview ROM of CM9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for replying after the recommendation I have upgraded to p4wifi milestone 3, its awesome.
Is there anything that you recommend to make it even better apps etc?
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
t1mman said:
ICS is to HoneyComb what Windows 7 is to Vista
just plain better!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Come on man its a big diff! Haha honeycomb is usable atleast not vista
Sent from my GT-P7500 using xda premium

Jellybean slow as hell!

Is it just me or after a few hours of use does TAJB's Jellybean rom become incredible slow and sluggish? I know its still in early development but its only an incremental update from ICS which seems to be stable (for the most part) but sometimes its just goes crazy on JellyBean despite the Project Butter enahncement. Im starting to think that these new versions of Android are startin to push the boundaries for our tired old Galaxy S1's :S
The hardware of the SGS1 is old and outdated its just something we have to come to terms with. After using other phones with official ICS I understand why the SGS hasn't been supported, so I'm guessing its much the same with JB..
I am using the cm10 unofficial its smooth as hell
driodmaster92 said:
I am using the cm10 unofficial its smooth as hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah ive been using that too, its only slightly more responsive but still get the same problems. especially if i try to use google voice, the thing just goes berzerk.
I'm yet on unofficial CM10 v2 and it's very smooth, I fell diffrence than ics.
driodmaster92 said:
I am using the cm10 unofficial its smooth as hell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 :good:
It's the launcher, most likely. I ran into that problem as well.
I'm on iall5tar's GNex ROM 4.1.1 Port and it's smoother than ICS, which was already fairly impressive.
Our i9000's are old, but each software upgrade is just that—an upgrade. JB is better than ICS, and ICS was better than GB. We didn't get the official update because Samsung thought their Touchwiz skinned ICS wouldn't run on our hardware. In reality, it was likely because they didn't want to spend money updating a device they no longer sold. Not because our phones couldn't actually run it.
My phone has no been faster than it is now, with JB. Blame the ROM, not the OS or the hardware.
After coming from slim ics 4.2 I also noticed slowdowns almost everywhere such as app opening, entering settings etc. On the other hand I felt the same with early and not so early ics roms like icssgs, and always went to gb roms after day or two because of slowdowns, lack of toggles etc.
Then I tried slim ics 3.x and never looked back. Same will probably happen with jb, first builds are ummature but when devs look deeper into sources and find differences and optimization for sgs, the phone will be beast
I just hope there will be other option for handling the limited space in internal flash memory than removing datadata altogether, as jb seems to improve touch and animation smoothness there is little Google can do to improve I/O performance.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
JB is not the end!
Hey Guys
I am using JB at the Moment, too (TAJB v6). I tested every JB ROM for our SGS from start, and in my opinion, the GNex ports were the fastest and also very stable, but unfortunately, the people want to move forward to CM10! Anyway, JB is definetly not too much for the SGS! Everything feels fast and smooth, exept of the randomly occuring super-launcher-lags. If this happens, just kill the Launcher Task or reboot. I think JB is not the last update for our SGS!
The clue in most cases lies in the term Alpha! You flash Alpha roms you are in effect becoming a tester, so don't grumble....work towards finding solutions and posting relevant feedback and bug reports
slaphead20 said:
The clue in most cases lies in the term Alpha! You flash Alpha roms you are in effect becoming a tester, so don't grumble....work towards finding solutions and posting relevant feedback and bug reports
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this slowness is because v6 is based on pawitp's CM10 build which has datadata deleted and used instead of it slower data/data.
try derteufel's JellyBean v2 - it works like a charm!
[jRO03C] OFICIAL ANDROID 4.1.1 (JELLY BEAN) GNEX STOCK ROM (16/07/12)
I'm on [jRO03C] OFICIAL ANDROID 4.1.1 (JELLY BEAN) GNEX STOCK ROM (16/07/12) since yesterday and it is still smooth as babyskin. No slowing down trouble.
Only issue is my BLN does not work anymore, probably because of one little setting
Fixed the BLN issue,I had to RTFM Enable pulsating notification light.
Found one other issue, volume during phone call is loud and cannot be changed.
dkjr said:
I'm on [jRO03C] OFICIAL ANDROID 4.1.1 (JELLY BEAN) GNEX STOCK ROM (16/07/12) since yesterday and it is still smooth as babyskin. No slowing down trouble.
Only issue is my BLN does not work anymore, probably because of one little setting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For those with lots of lag I recommend flashing again. I was on CM10 Alpha and it was super slow. Couldn't believe people were saying it was fast. Flashed Slim Beans which was also slow. Figured either people are crazy or it's me. Even read something about older phones having slower memory than newer ones etc.
Flashed Slim Beans a second time and this time there is no comparison. Now it is much faster. In fact it is almost like having a different phone.
I'm on [ROM GNEXUS PORT] jro03c 4.1.1 beta 4 [oficial jelly bean stock rom] and at first it's sluggish as hell...after a while it does begin to work a little bit smoother....but then again, it's nothing compared to other ICS 4.0.3-4.0.4 custom roms out there....it still needs a lot of work.
It has nothing to do with datadata and everything to do with the fact that project butter hasn't even been implemented yet. For example I use slim and it is super fast, it has no datadata.
Also we need a driver update and until we get that no butter for us.
Plus its an alpha build. Give it a break.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
vSync is not working yet. Also all JB releases are currently signed "Alpha" or "Beta", so what do you expect? They are not (yet) made for being used as a daily driver. Thanks to the devs, the development will continue
BTW: I also tried all current JB ROMs but they are still too unstable for me. It's nice to see that the i9000 can run them but actually they are not that stable yet.
yea it`s slow
i`m using JR003C it seems so slow and the network signal is down sometimes..:confused
There is a fix for the slow V6 on teamjellybean.noez.in but this is down for now... Wait for V7 and it will be smooth i think.
troyan1988 said:
this slowness is because v6 is based on pawitp's CM10 build which has datadata deleted and used instead of it slower data/data.
try derteufel's JellyBean v2 - it works like a charm!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no its not i've tested the one with datadata and the one without there is no difference

Jellybean, disappointed with project butter. anyone else?

I have been loading most of the patchwork JB Roms that have been popping up here. I like some things about it, like Google Now, but I cant seem to understand "project butter." I cannot tell any real difference in smooth-ness. It still seems pretty laggy on my NS4G. I am hoping this is because either I have been using a newer device as my daily driver, or just that these Roms are hacked from other releases.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are your experiences with devices like the nexus 7 that were designed with JellyBean? smoother? same?
Nope I can see the difference its faster & smoother than ICS open app draw opens fast in ICS it took a little longer jellybean is the best OS update from Google so far 2 big thumbs up & I'm getting the same or a little better battery life than I was on ICS
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
I can definitely see a huge difference it terms of smoothness. You should probably delete some apps you don't need or do a factory wipe.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
I mirror your experience, however am still hopeful that when Sprint releases the actual files, things will be better. I haven't experienced JB on any of the newer devices, but the reports are good. Life is all about expectations ... guess we should be thankful that we're even receiving the updates.
Killasmoke said:
Nope I can see the difference its faster & smoother than ICS open app draw opens fast in ICS it took a little longer jellybean is the best OS update from Google so far 2 big thumbs up & I'm getting the same or a little better battery life than I was on ICS
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
FYI---it is VERY hard to understand you without any punctuation.
You still should keep in mind that we're on a 2 year old device... yeah yeah the original Nexus S came out in Dec 2010... not quite 2 years, but it's based off of tech that debuted in the original Galaxy S in the summer of that year. It's great hardware, but it's expected that we'll have a tough time dealing with newer OS' ... quite frankly I've considered going back to a stripped down CM7 just because of the smoothness compared to ICS (and JB) ... we're just running into serious RAM limitations on this device.
Piaband said:
I have been loading most of the patchwork JB Roms that have been popping up here. I like some things about it, like Google Now, but I cant seem to understand "project butter." I cannot tell any real difference in smooth-ness. It still seems pretty laggy on my NS4G. I am hoping this is because either I have been using a newer device as my daily driver, or just that these Roms are hacked from other releases.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are your experiences with devices like the nexus 7 that were designed with JellyBean? smoother? same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try different kernels as well with the rom.
I definitely see a difference,
I have no more lag at all with what i used to before.
I think, the UI can be a bit smoother, but multitasking and opening/closing apps works smoooooth!
Much faster and smoother than ICS.
Running Jelly Belly 1.5.1
Don't expect 2 much from old device like nexus s.
Google is getting sued for project butter being "too smooth" by apple because apple claimed smoothness was patented.
Kidding,
But, I could see it happening.
JB is 3 steps ahead of any other OS :x
I am on jelly bean. I want to ask too why browsing in chrome is laggy? Opening apps and switching between apps is smooth though, but I dont feel that only switching and opening apps constitute the project butter.
I just don't like the fact that it keeps the phone awake over night. You ask me jellybean trying to do too much in the background. Last night I turned off 3g. When I woke up someone sent me a mms at 12am. When I check the battery stats it kept my phone awake trying to download a mms without data on. Not to smart
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda app-developers app
lekhwani said:
I am on jelly bean. I want to ask too why browsing in chrome is laggy? Opening apps and switching between apps is smooth though, but I dont feel that only switching and opening apps constitute the project butter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dialer slow, opening Apps in Settings freaking slow, chrome slow...
JB gave new life to my NS, definitely the smoothest it has ever been, and I don't feel the need to OC. As I do with all phones/roms, all transitions and animations are turned off, including the third one added with JB. Also using Nova launcher, but am going to try Apex again now that they updated it with JB base.
And the biggest thing I noticed is how quickly the recents come up now, it's instant. I honestly didn't think that would be possible on the NS.
Piaband said:
I have been loading most of the patchwork JB Roms that have been popping up here. I like some things about it, like Google Now, but I cant seem to understand "project butter." I cannot tell any real difference in smooth-ness. It still seems pretty laggy on my NS4G. I am hoping this is because either I have been using a newer device as my daily driver, or just that these Roms are hacked from other releases.
Does anyone else feel this way? What are your experiences with devices like the nexus 7 that were designed with JellyBean? smoother? same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pick up the Galaxy Nexus and you'll see the difference much clearer. NS is just plain old.
Why don't you try setting animations to 0.5?
Nexus S (GMS i9020a)
Paranoid (1.6 - 4.0.4)
Matrix Kernel (CFS - 20.0)
Ondemmand (800/100)
Deep Idle (On - Deadline)
Live OC - 100 (400/800)
BLX - 98 (Inverted Apps)
People don't like change, I remember seeing threads bashing ICS when it came out. Its new and the devs here have done made great progress in the short time since its release.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
smoka206 said:
People don't like change, I remember seeing threads bashing ICS when it came out. Its new and the devs here have done made great progress in the short time since its release.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not bashing at all, love jelly bean.
Just mentioned where is slow.
Piaband said:
FYI---it is VERY hard to understand you without any punctuation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't know I was in school & you where an English teacher. I think you need an eye exam if you can't see or feel that jellybean is faster than ICS.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
lekhwani said:
I am on jelly bean. I want to ask too why browsing in chrome is laggy? Opening apps and switching between apps is smooth though, but I dont feel that only switching and opening apps constitute the project butter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Chrome is a ram hog. Add in all the other processes eating ram, and you'll see why it's laggy.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2

CyanogenMod 10 M1

CyanogenMod 10 M1 is available
"We aren’t exactly sure what M stands for. “Monthly”, “milestone”, or perhaps “MINE ALL MINE!”. Whatever it is, I hope that we are meeting the needs of community.
M-Series builds will be available under the EXPERIMENTAL tag. The filename will include the date stamp as well as the M version. These builds should be stable enough for daily use, and we encourage feedback and bug reports."
Download:
http://get.cm/?device=crespo&type=nightly
Source:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/cyanogenmod-10-m1
There are ninghtly, firmware updated daily and therefore possibly unstable, but they develop stops ("freeze") and start the release candidate and finally reaches a stable ROM. This was more or less up to now the procedure for CyanogenMod, but now the team has announced a new feature: the monthly build.
As can be imagined firmware is released on a monthly basis, after a "soft freeze" of the code done in order to stabilize the code more than the daily nightly.
Dedicated to those who do not want to flash a ROM every other day and the next also, the monthly will be available at the beginning of each new month but initially cover only a subset of all devices supported by CyanogenMod. Specifically, the first release of the M-series
Galaxy Nexus GSM (maguro)
VZW Galaxy Nexus (bull)
Sprint Galaxy Nexus (toroplus)
Galaxy S2 GT-I9100G (i9100g)
Galaxy S (galaxysmtd)
Galaxy S B (galaxysbmtd)
Captivate (captivatemtd)
Sprint Galaxy S3 (d2spr)
VZW Galaxy S3 (d2vzw)
AT & T Galaxy S3 (d2att)
Galaxy S3 TMO (d2tmo)
Galaxy S3 U.S. Cellular (d2usc)
Nexus S (crespo)
Nexus S 4G (crespo4g)
Galaxy Note AT & T (quincyatt)
Google Nexus 7 (grouper)
Sony Xperia Acro S (hikari)
Sony Xperia S (nozomi)
This is not yet a final project in the sense that the team will decide on its continuation or not, depending on user feedback, because it is not logical to maintain something of little use.
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
carlito00w said:
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Carlito, is it faster than stock 4.1.1? I flashed Matr1x and I was delighted with the speed and performance but battery was drained too quickly. Is this rom that fast?
Now i have nightly [cm-10-20120908-NIGHTLY-crespo.zip ], and there are many errors ;/
I do FULL WIPE ???
cinek1987cinek said:
Now i have nightly [cm-10-20120908-NIGHTLY-crespo.zip ], and there are many errors ;/
I do FULL WIPE ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, please!:cyclops:
cinek1987cinek said:
Now i have nightly [cm-10-20120908-NIGHTLY-crespo.zip ], and there are many errors ;/
I do FULL WIPE ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need full wipe for me, I flash over NIGHTLY-20120909. everything work and very smooth.
Just wipe cache partition and then flash M1.
does this support adhoc like cm9?
does this support adhoc like cm9? plz answer
Unfortunately, cm 10, nightlies or M versions seems to be much slower than cm9.1. I hope it becomes lagless one day, just as cm9. It was sluggish at the beggining, now it's awesome at speed, responsiveness and usage. Hope it's gonna be just the same with cm10.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
carlito00w said:
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I accidentally cleared google framework data after the install, for some links were broken. Now Market is not working. Clues??
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
I don't know about the current nightly but the "M1" version is awfully slow in comparison with Paranoid Android 2.0. I have even tried it with Air kernel (+65fps) which is one of the fastest kernels and Matr1x. I returned to PA 2.0.
I don't think that there is a serious reason for a monthly version. Nightly versions are very reliable in my experience...someone just have to choose his own "frequency of updating"...
I hope that we are not many "Ms" away from the RC or stable release! They'll have to speed up that ROM though.
wow thanks :thumbup:,
installed on my i9023 and work fine!
__
which kernel do you recommend for save the battery life?
Inviato dal mio Nexus S i9023 Italia
carlito00w said:
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is gallery and music player able to read from SD card?
Muvolt said:
I don't know about the current nightly but the "M1" version is awfully slow in comparison with Paranoid Android 2.0. I have even tried it with Air kernel (+65fps) which is one of the fastest kernels and Matr1x. I returned to PA 2.0.
I don't think that there is a serious reason for a monthly version. Nightly versions are very reliable in my experience...someone just have to choose his own "frequency of updating"...
I hope that we are not many "Ms" away from the RC or stable release! They'll have to speed up that ROM though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think something that many people forget is that not all phones are lucky enough to have AOSP support. I only have my Nexus S but I imagine that CM10 is not bugless and magical for all the devices it's built for.
M1
It's ready to daily use.. until now no problems, thanks a lot.
Been using this with the stock kernel and very impressed. 2hours 30 min screen time and still 52 % battery left. Only lost 8% over night with WiFi enabled. Best I've seen JB do since it appeared.
Sent from my Nexus S running Cyanogen 10
nexususer1 said:
Unfortunately, cm 10, nightlies or M versions seems to be much slower than cm9.1. I hope it becomes lagless one day, just as cm9. It was sluggish at the beggining, now it's awesome at speed, responsiveness and usage. Hope it's gonna be just the same with cm10.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed - same for me as well. Seems to be much more lag when connected to mobile data as opposed to wifi for some reason.
nexususer1 said:
Unfortunately, cm 10, nightlies or M versions seems to be much slower than cm9.1. I hope it becomes lagless one day, just as cm9. It was sluggish at the beggining, now it's awesome at speed, responsiveness and usage. Hope it's gonna be just the same with cm10.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is exactly how i feel about CM10 at the moment too!
Just needs more time to mature!
Gave it a go, still sluggish. Back to AOSP.
Cm10 with bedalus 4.5 gives me battery life similar, if not better to ICS and GB (which is very good!)

[POLL] What OS are you settling with

From a previous poll a few of you are going to keep your Nexus S for a year or more. So, what Android OS version (doesn't matter what ROM) or other OS are you settling with?
Jellybean 4.2.2 (more precisely Jellyshot 4.1)
Jelly Bean 4.1.2, CM 10 last nightly. 4.2 is just to much for the Nexus hardware (RAM to be precise) and there doesn't exist single thing which I find interesting to keep it.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Ted Mosby said:
Jelly Bean 4.1.2, CM 10 last nightly. 4.2 is just to much for the Nexus hardware (RAM to be precise) and there doesn't exist single thing which I find interesting to keep it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Swipe keyboard perhaps?
You can just flash a zip & get the stock android 4.2 swipe keyboard!
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
I'm running the last official AOKP milestone release- it's using 4.1.2- with the last Matr1x kernel release. I keep most settings at default. It's the best all-around experience (stability, speed, battery) that I've ever had on this phone. I still lurk these forums and am surprised that I don't see more folks running this simple setup. It's like running a smooth stock Android phone, but with a few key extras. It's just the best to "settle" with.
Apparently gingerbread because it is just so smooth and the boot time is much faster since it doesn't have the triple buffer stuff
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
For use GB i really prefer use ICS! Its beautiful tham GB and still very fast.
Perhaps. Gamerzrom is ama ing fast! 4.2 sure is too much for our 512mb. But dont know why, its like 4.1
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk 2
Android 4.2...
Jellyshot is performing really well on my phone. But then I'm a ROM flashing addict so i'll be visiting various pastures :laugh:
Jelly Bean 4.2.2 for sure
i hear some ppl saying that 4.1 is better because it's faster on our older hardware, but some of the 4.2 roms/mods/tweaks/kernel combinations are at least just as fast

Categories

Resources