CyanogenMod 10 M1 is available
"We aren’t exactly sure what M stands for. “Monthly”, “milestone”, or perhaps “MINE ALL MINE!”. Whatever it is, I hope that we are meeting the needs of community.
M-Series builds will be available under the EXPERIMENTAL tag. The filename will include the date stamp as well as the M version. These builds should be stable enough for daily use, and we encourage feedback and bug reports."
Download:
http://get.cm/?device=crespo&type=nightly
Source:
http://www.cyanogenmod.com/blog/cyanogenmod-10-m1
There are ninghtly, firmware updated daily and therefore possibly unstable, but they develop stops ("freeze") and start the release candidate and finally reaches a stable ROM. This was more or less up to now the procedure for CyanogenMod, but now the team has announced a new feature: the monthly build.
As can be imagined firmware is released on a monthly basis, after a "soft freeze" of the code done in order to stabilize the code more than the daily nightly.
Dedicated to those who do not want to flash a ROM every other day and the next also, the monthly will be available at the beginning of each new month but initially cover only a subset of all devices supported by CyanogenMod. Specifically, the first release of the M-series
Galaxy Nexus GSM (maguro)
VZW Galaxy Nexus (bull)
Sprint Galaxy Nexus (toroplus)
Galaxy S2 GT-I9100G (i9100g)
Galaxy S (galaxysmtd)
Galaxy S B (galaxysbmtd)
Captivate (captivatemtd)
Sprint Galaxy S3 (d2spr)
VZW Galaxy S3 (d2vzw)
AT & T Galaxy S3 (d2att)
Galaxy S3 TMO (d2tmo)
Galaxy S3 U.S. Cellular (d2usc)
Nexus S (crespo)
Nexus S 4G (crespo4g)
Galaxy Note AT & T (quincyatt)
Google Nexus 7 (grouper)
Sony Xperia Acro S (hikari)
Sony Xperia S (nozomi)
This is not yet a final project in the sense that the team will decide on its continuation or not, depending on user feedback, because it is not logical to maintain something of little use.
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
carlito00w said:
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Carlito, is it faster than stock 4.1.1? I flashed Matr1x and I was delighted with the speed and performance but battery was drained too quickly. Is this rom that fast?
Now i have nightly [cm-10-20120908-NIGHTLY-crespo.zip ], and there are many errors ;/
I do FULL WIPE ???
cinek1987cinek said:
Now i have nightly [cm-10-20120908-NIGHTLY-crespo.zip ], and there are many errors ;/
I do FULL WIPE ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, please!:cyclops:
cinek1987cinek said:
Now i have nightly [cm-10-20120908-NIGHTLY-crespo.zip ], and there are many errors ;/
I do FULL WIPE ???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No need full wipe for me, I flash over NIGHTLY-20120909. everything work and very smooth.
Just wipe cache partition and then flash M1.
does this support adhoc like cm9?
does this support adhoc like cm9? plz answer
Unfortunately, cm 10, nightlies or M versions seems to be much slower than cm9.1. I hope it becomes lagless one day, just as cm9. It was sluggish at the beggining, now it's awesome at speed, responsiveness and usage. Hope it's gonna be just the same with cm10.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
carlito00w said:
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I accidentally cleared google framework data after the install, for some links were broken. Now Market is not working. Clues??
Sent from my Nexus S using xda app-developers app
I don't know about the current nightly but the "M1" version is awfully slow in comparison with Paranoid Android 2.0. I have even tried it with Air kernel (+65fps) which is one of the fastest kernels and Matr1x. I returned to PA 2.0.
I don't think that there is a serious reason for a monthly version. Nightly versions are very reliable in my experience...someone just have to choose his own "frequency of updating"...
I hope that we are not many "Ms" away from the RC or stable release! They'll have to speed up that ROM though.
wow thanks :thumbup:,
installed on my i9023 and work fine!
__
which kernel do you recommend for save the battery life?
Inviato dal mio Nexus S i9023 Italia
carlito00w said:
Finaly i'm come back to CM, my favourite rom.
flashed on my nexus s gsm 4h ago.
Until now:
No bugs
All works
Fast
Tnx to CM
P.S: If someone have trouble with apps installation with playstore... clear data of PlayStore and Google Framework in App Menu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is gallery and music player able to read from SD card?
Muvolt said:
I don't know about the current nightly but the "M1" version is awfully slow in comparison with Paranoid Android 2.0. I have even tried it with Air kernel (+65fps) which is one of the fastest kernels and Matr1x. I returned to PA 2.0.
I don't think that there is a serious reason for a monthly version. Nightly versions are very reliable in my experience...someone just have to choose his own "frequency of updating"...
I hope that we are not many "Ms" away from the RC or stable release! They'll have to speed up that ROM though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think something that many people forget is that not all phones are lucky enough to have AOSP support. I only have my Nexus S but I imagine that CM10 is not bugless and magical for all the devices it's built for.
M1
It's ready to daily use.. until now no problems, thanks a lot.
Been using this with the stock kernel and very impressed. 2hours 30 min screen time and still 52 % battery left. Only lost 8% over night with WiFi enabled. Best I've seen JB do since it appeared.
Sent from my Nexus S running Cyanogen 10
nexususer1 said:
Unfortunately, cm 10, nightlies or M versions seems to be much slower than cm9.1. I hope it becomes lagless one day, just as cm9. It was sluggish at the beggining, now it's awesome at speed, responsiveness and usage. Hope it's gonna be just the same with cm10.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed - same for me as well. Seems to be much more lag when connected to mobile data as opposed to wifi for some reason.
nexususer1 said:
Unfortunately, cm 10, nightlies or M versions seems to be much slower than cm9.1. I hope it becomes lagless one day, just as cm9. It was sluggish at the beggining, now it's awesome at speed, responsiveness and usage. Hope it's gonna be just the same with cm10.
Sent from my Nexus S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is exactly how i feel about CM10 at the moment too!
Just needs more time to mature!
Gave it a go, still sluggish. Back to AOSP.
Cm10 with bedalus 4.5 gives me battery life similar, if not better to ICS and GB (which is very good!)
Related
Hello There
I am a new Owner of DHD - Just couple of days ago I received my new handset - after selling Apples iPhone 4 32GB.
I brought it from eBay at half the price that I got from selling iPhone(almost 2 years old).
Now to the point:
After rooting DHD and trying different roms base don Android 2.3.x and ICS And JB - Finally I set My eye and Phone of course on this amazing ROM:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1778202.
It's super Fast - everything works - and much better and stable that any other rom I've tried and Beleive I have.
For last 4 days I installed almost 8 of them and this " JELLYTIME for DHD/Inspire4g - R14" by far most stable and fast version of them all.
It of course has its little quirks but nothing that affects functionality.
Recommending it wholeheartedly
Enjoy Guys
What is the status of the video camera in JellyTime? Can it record in full HD yet?
720p, but that works great
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda app-developers app
This ROM (one of the Releases between R7-14) PWND my 3G and Network Connectivity and now any ASOP ROM does not allow OTA network connection... I'm trying to load it with one of the sense radio's I hope I don't brick my phone doing so, cause I love these ROMS (sense is soooooo lame) and I really hope I'm trying to do something that can be done...
lawrencew said:
What is the status of the video camera in JellyTime? Can it record in full HD yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DHD never will record full HD, because it needs dual core CPU and DHD has only single core...
This is not true
Sorry but this rom is not working correctly on DHD
For example wifi hotspot isn't working
sirbaili said:
Hello There
I am a new Owner of DHD - Just couple of days ago I received my new handset - after selling Apples iPhone 4 32GB.
I brought it from eBay at half the price that I got from selling iPhone(almost 2 years old).
Now to the point:
After rooting DHD and trying different roms base don Android 2.3.x and ICS And JB - Finally I set My eye and Phone of course on this amazing ROM:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1778202.
It's super Fast - everything works - and much better and stable that any other rom I've tried and Beleive I have.
For last 4 days I installed almost 8 of them and this " JELLYTIME for DHD/Inspire4g - R14" by far most stable and fast version of them all.
It of course has its little quirks but nothing that affects functionality.
Recommending it wholeheartedly
Enjoy Guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
everything work fine for me
Working 100%
For me 2. Excellent JB ROM and Sabsa Prime 6.5 ICS is a very good ROM too. But the only problem is the RAM Memory management.
hstorm2007 said:
everything work fine for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
data
hstorm2007 said:
everything work fine for me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you please tell me the component versions (ex kernel version, ecc).
I cannot understand why it's not working good on my dhd.
Thanks in advance
since i rooted my DHD i became some kind ROMs maniac been trying all the linux distros on my laptop now doing the same with my DHD thats because I love testing operating systems and software this have always been my passion so far...
now about the phone and JellyTime tring JT r16 on it already using for two days not single problem has happened to me... always doing full format including SD card before installing a new ROM tho.
what can I say in general about JT looks fast and stable so is for example SabsaPrime (sabsa has for sure best battery life i ever seen) the ram usage seems to be the same as Sabsa ICS as far a I prefer sense roms gonna go back to sabsa. anyway both are great roms :good:
sorry for my language
I was running jt for a while. Loved it fast stable. Then I found sabsa prime. I average about 11-12 hrs battery under moderate to heavy useage.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda app-developers app
I have been running Jellytime for a while its a great rom but the latest versions have had a few hiccups but the dev RandonBlame is working to fix the issues I would recommend it.
I don't understand why people still run older android versions like Gingerbread or ICS when we now have Jelly Time instead. Why bother with old versions? Can anyone explain?
i will stick around with sanwitch a little more, and in a couple of months when good ROMS with Jellybeam will be released :fingers-crossed: i will try them then
Had to retreat to Ice Cold...
I have been using JellyTime since R3 and love it
But I started getting the blackscreen problem from R15 onwards .
I tried R16, R17 & R17.1 all with clean installs and still got the issue.
Unfortunately as the DHD is my daily driver and I am traveling over the next few weeks, I need the stability of and battery life of Ice Cold Sandwich. Which is a real shame as I hate going backward.
As a newbie, I can't post to the dev forum, but I shall return to JellyTime in the near future, I want to see how good the DHD is on JB 4.1.2.
Use sabsa prime or trickdroid stable Roms with great battery life.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda premium
JellyTime R17.1 is very buggy but the Best ROM
Stability, speed, battery life.
On Jellytime I last 2 hours of screen usage. With cm7 I've lasted for 12hrs on flights listening to music, reading ebooks, with airplane mode+wifi.
I happen to like the look of stock gb as well.
Sent from my Inspire 4G using xda app-developers app
Travelawyer said:
I don't understand why people still run older android versions like Gingerbread or ICS when we now have Jelly Time instead. Why bother with old versions? Can anyone explain?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Simply because ICS and JB room were not build to run with DHD, so you can have some bugs like Camera, MMS, Batterylife etc...
Mostly all the bugs have been worked out on r18.1 of jellytime
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda app-developers app
So, the aosp development has started and cm10 nightlies are out...
Please would you post your battery stats with screen on time
Let the fun begin
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
I'm using Utacka's Paranoid Android Nov16 Build. (Not using the latest build because Tethering encryption was not working on Builds 17-18)
2hrs of watching HD videos.
1hr of streaming music on Google Play Music.
1hr of browsing.
Maximum brightness and mobile data on the whole time.
mlecruz said:
I'm using Utacka's Paranoid Android Nov16 Build. (Not using the latest build because Tethering encryption was not working on Builds 17-18)
2hrs of watching HD videos.
1hr of streaming music on Google Play Music.
1hr of browsing.
Maximum brightness and mobile data on the whole time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply :thumbup:
Battery life just not as good as stock right....
I guess i will switch to aosp whem 4.2 is ready
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
mlecruz said:
I'm using Utacka's Paranoid Android Nov16 Build. (Not using the latest build because Tethering encryption was not working on Builds 17-18)
2hrs of watching HD videos.
1hr of streaming music on Google Play Music.
1hr of browsing.
Maximum brightness and mobile data on the whole time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi. So can you confirm that WIFI tethering works with encryption on Utacka's Nov16 build? Thanks
kristofpetho said:
Hi. So can you confirm that WIFI tethering works with encryption on Utacka's Nov16 build? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I can confirm that it works on the Nov16 build. There would be a problem with tethering though if you use the NEAK kernel with the Nov16 build last time I tested. Maybe the NEAK kernel is OK now.
I am running a kernel with OC and stock samsung 4.1.2. Honestly im kind of shocked at the difference between stock and aosp based battery time.
Im getting literally TRIPPLE more worth of battery time in stock then aosp. TRIPPLE!
And mind you that i have not debloated it too much. Just some apps that i know i never use. And im running the kernel pretty aggressive. Full OC and not undervolted a thing.
I always used cm or anything aosp based on my phones mostly because of battery and the pure slimness in vanilla builds.
But now i feel that the drain is actually to great to justify running aosp. Even though i really don't like TouchWiz, i truly love and cherish batterytime, responsiveness and foremost, full use of the capabilites this fine device has...
For once i feel that aosp is one step behind what samsung already has made for this device.
Of course i understand that almost everything is still in a kind of beta version and it most probably will improve. But for the time being. Im choosing original. Thou i never thought this day would come.
Do NOT take this post as a bash against aosp versions out there. I truly admire every one of them and im proud to be able to test most of them. But the bottom line is what works best for you and your needs.
I hope 4.2 brings more news to this magical device.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Yes stock has the best battery life from my experience. I like testing different ROMs so much so that I change almost every week. But right now I'm using a custom ROM based on stock.
I'll try to provide more battery life info on other AOXP/CM10/PA ROMs when I have the time. Possibly going to make a standard procedure for testing...
This phones still quite new so we will have to wait for development to start speeding up :sly:
Fingers crossed for 4.2
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Reb0rn said:
I am running a kernel with OC and stock samsung 4.1.2. Honestly im kind of shocked at the difference between stock and aosp based battery time.
Im getting literally TRIPPLE more worth of battery time in stock then aosp. TRIPPLE!
And mind you that i have not debloated it too much. Just some apps that i know i never use. And im running the kernel pretty aggressive. Full OC and not undervolted a thing.
I always used cm or anything aosp based on my phones mostly because of battery and the pure slimness in vanilla builds.
But now i feel that the drain is actually to great to justify running aosp. Even though i really don't like TouchWiz, i truly love and cherish batterytime, responsiveness and foremost, full use of the capabilites this fine device has...
For once i feel that aosp is one step behind what samsung already has made for this device.
Of course i understand that almost everything is still in a kind of beta version and it most probably will improve. But for the time being. Im choosing original. Thou i never thought this day would come.
Do NOT take this post as a bash against aosp versions out there. I truly admire every one of them and im proud to be able to test most of them. But the bottom line is what works best for you and your needs.
I hope 4.2 brings more news to this magical device.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what rom and kernel are u on mate?
Hello guys I'm new here,i get this device 2 days ago(coming from HTC Pico development)...I want your opinion for the fastest ROM,with a nice battery life and UI .Kernel too !
Regards !
i don't know about speed but if you want good battery life and stability, you should use original samsung gb roms like jw1 or newer (my choice is jw1 rom with jvt modem and aosp lock). Then use cf-root for rooting and remove bloatwares. A little advice, don't waste your time with ics or jb developments, because you don't seem to looking for only the fastest rom.
oblikas said:
Hello guys I'm new here,i get this device 2 days ago(coming from HTC Pico development)...I want your opinion for the fastest ROM,with a nice battery life and UI .Kernel too !
Regards !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I like this: Slim Bean http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1780071
Test yourself
I've tested almost 10 ROMS, and in my opinion, test yourself.
For me, based on JB are good but battery life very poor.
Based on ICS, the best at the moment. My favorites:
1. Realrom v5: Very good battery, smooth, but not very good for playing.
2. SlimRom: very nice, very smooth, no lags but poor battery.
3. Biohazard 7: very very fast, but.... buggie! Problem of restarting.
4. My favorite: SmoothieICS: fast, vary good battery (2 days using greenpower), and perfect games. Still in beta version.
Hope it help you!
billydrak said:
I've tested almost 10 ROMS, and in my opinion, test yourself.
For me, based on JB are good but battery life very poor.
Based on ICS, the best at the moment. My favorites:
1. Realrom v5: Very good battery, smooth, but not very good for playing.
2. SlimRom: very nice, very smooth, no lags but poor battery.
3. Biohazard 7: very very fast, but.... buggie! Problem of restarting.
4. My favorite: SmoothieICS: fast, vary good battery (2 days using greenpower), and perfect games. Still in beta version.
Hope it help you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks !
HI,
is anyone using one of these roms?
download.cyanogenmod.org/?type=nightly&device=galaxysmtd
Why are these not listed in the development area here on xda, what is the difference?
hansoswald said:
HI,
is anyone using one of these roms?
download.cyanogenmod.org/?type=nightly&device=galaxysmtd
Why are these not listed in the development area here on xda, what is the difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those are the Cyanogenmod ROMs, and they are listed in the dev section, look for threads started by pawtip. CM10.1 pre-release thread is on page one, CM10 thread is on page two at the time of my posting.
Hr Kristian said:
Those are the Cyanogenmod ROMs, and they are listed in the dev section, look for threads started by pawtip. CM10.1 pre-release thread is on page one, CM10 thread is on page two at the time of my posting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot!
I was confused as I couldn't find any references to the cyanogenmod.org site. On the dev page 1 there is the thread
[AOSP][ROM][4.2.1] JellyBean 4.2 PREVIEW (20121205)
wich is AOSP using cyanoges galaxy s tree, but, well, not cynogenmod...
And indeed, on page 2 there is
[NIGHTLY][ROM][4.1.2] CyanogenMod 10 for Samsung Galaxy S
The download link reveals cyanogenmod.org
Anyway, how is helly bean? Hasn't been mentioned, yet!?!
I am about to install this one, but have never tried it before, though.
Patience
hansoswald said:
Thanks a lot!
I was confused as I couldn't find any references to the cyanogenmod.org site. On the dev page 1 there is the thread
[AOSP][ROM][4.2.1] JellyBean 4.2 PREVIEW (20121205)
wich is AOSP using cyanoges galaxy s tree, but, well, not cynogenmod...
And indeed, on page 2 there is
[NIGHTLY][ROM][4.1.2] CyanogenMod 10 for Samsung Galaxy S
The download link reveals cyanogenmod.org
Anyway, how is helly bean? Hasn't been mentioned, yet!?!
I am about to install this one, but have never tried it before, though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait a few days - or if we are lucky a few hours - then I think pawitp will create what you (and more) are looking for! :good:
I expect something like this: [NIGHTLY][ROM][4.2.1] CyanogenMod 10.1 for Samsung Galaxy S
Chipsi said:
Wait a few days - or if we are lucky a few hours - then I think pawitp will create what you (and more) are looking for! :good:
I expect something like this: [NIGHTLY][ROM][4.2.1] CyanogenMod 10.1 for Samsung Galaxy S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Helly Bean already is 4.2.1:
hellybean.com/I900042.html
But the majorety goes for CM instead of Helly Bean?
CM10
AOSP 4.2.1 (current)
above rom is awesome what I using.
hellybean and the devil kernel
there are also a 4.2 version which works great
Slim Bean is perfect for customizing..But not for performance i think..
The best combo is Elite's JB builds+latest semaphore kernel so far ..(I think).
But you can try it! I love Slim Bean just for tweaks ... The best one is "high end effects" for me
When you're scrolling not. drawer down,background's dim is channging... Gettin' dark just like Gnexus/Galaxy SIII or other devices which got offical JB !
Also an advice ;
If you wanna long lifetime battery best one is JW8 GB ROM
For me latest CM10 Nightly with Devil Kernel and maybe Lazeroid script works very smooth. No lags in GTA:VC on mid/high settings
midnight911 said:
For me latest CM10 Nightly with Devil Kernel and maybe Lazeroid script works very smooth. No lags in GTA:VC on mid/high settings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is CM10 better than SlimBean 3.1 in game? (Lazeroid and Semaphore)
for me the fastes is Beast rom 4.2.1 with linaro project + lazeroid 2.1 + semaphore kernel.
That's configuration and it is very smooth.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
I prefer the SlimBean ROM 3.1. It is fast, smooth and the battery is also ok
CM 7.2.0 + ntsense cm7 theme + devil kernel = awesome look + battery life.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Best Rom cm10 with devil kernel smooth with great battety life
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
CM10.1 + semaphore kernel!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Looking for feedback on CM10.1 vs. sticking with the stock ROM. I've used CM10.1 on my GS3 , but wondering what the advantages are of using it on the N4.
Being that you have used both stock build and cm10 you should be able to judge which works better for you.
Sent from my Optimus G using XDA premium
pros: added features, fixes bugs from the stock ROM
cons: none
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
The pros are the same as your galaxy. It's the same rom
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk HD
Does the Google voice integration work the same (ie when it takes over the phone and messaging functions completely)
Sorry to jump on this, but I'm considering the same largely for battery and some tweaking options.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
emailrob said:
Does the Google voice integration work the same (ie when it takes over the phone and messaging functions completely)
Sorry to jump on this, but I'm considering the same largely for battery and some tweaking options.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes it works the same. you can set it to do that if you choose to, if not u can disable it.
The only con is a slightly slower Android upgrade path. Having said that, 2-3 weeks max (for a Nexus device) isn't that long to wait. Beats all the manufacturers.
Ajfink said:
The only con is a slightly slower Android upgrade path. Having said that, 2-3 weeks max (for a Nexus device) isn't that long to wait. Beats all the manufacturers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really. When CM does get updated to the next version of Android, Nexus devices are the first to get it on CM whereas other devices will take longer (and things may not be working day one for other phones whereas Nexus it will be working from day one, just not all the CM goodies will be available right away as it'll take time to port them over)
Alternatively, people may flash non-CM roms and just a AOSP version of the new Android to try out new features etc etc
My biggest consideration is battery , I'm not impressed with my battery hardly making it through a 8 hours of the day.
ksujace said:
My biggest consideration is battery , I'm not impressed with my battery hardly making it through a 8 hours of the day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM10 will most definitely help you out with that. Some people have been getting weird Android OS or Mediaserver troubles that eat away at their battery with stock 4.2.1. How many hours of screen on time are you getting?
ksujace said:
My biggest consideration is battery , I'm not impressed with my battery hardly making it through a 8 hours of the day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel plays a bigger role in battery conservation more than a ROM. People always gets mixed between the two.
To fix battery problems,
1) Ensure Google Latitude is off (it's in Google Maps). Disable automatic reporting of location and all the other checks in that menu.
2) Flash a ROM that meets your requirements (there is no BEST ROM).
3) Flash a Kernel that meets your requirements based upon feedback and past experiences (there is no BEST KERNEL).
4) Install BetterBatteryStats @ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1179809
5) Use BetterBatteryStats to ensure there are no kernel and partial wakelocks. If there are debug them. Ensure that your phone is indeed deep sleeping (use BetterBatteryStats to look at CPUStates or download CPUSpy from Play Store).
I recommend CM10.1 Jellybro + Franco Kernel, but that's based on my own personal opinions. Look around the dev forums and decide what you like the most
Edit: Oh yeah, how could I forget... go into Google Now and disable the cards you don't need.
zephiK said:
Kernel plays a bigger role in battery conservation more than a ROM. People always gets mixed between the two.
To fix battery problems,
1) Ensure Google Latitude is off (it's in Google Maps). Disable automatic reporting of location and all the other checks in that menu.
2) Flash a ROM that meets your requirements (there is no BEST ROM).
3) Flash a Kernel that meets your requirements based upon feedback and past experiences (there is no BEST KERNEL).
4) Install BetterBatteryStats @ http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1179809
5) Use BetterBatteryStats to ensure there are no kernel and partial wakelocks. If there are debug them. Ensure that your phone is indeed deep sleeping (use BetterBatteryStats to look at CPUStates or download CPUSpy from Play Store).
I recommend CM10.1 Jellybro + Franco Kernel, but that's based on my own personal opinions. Look around the dev forums and decide what you like the most
Edit: Oh yeah, how could I forget... go into Google Now and disable the cards you don't need.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for CM10.1 Jellybro + Franco. I've also used MiNCO ROM which is pretty good, but not a ton of features yet so I'm sticking with CM10.1
Installed CM10.1 , seems there is more real estate (5 icons across vs 4?) ...
anyone else had the problem where you can't create app folders on the home screen?
Hey what is CM10.1 JellyBro?
Is it the nightly CM 10,1?
ksujace said:
Installed CM10.1 , seems there is more real estate (5 icons across vs 4?) ...
anyone else had the problem where you can't create app folders on the home screen?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear that's an issue on the latest nightly. I'm sure they'll address that in the upcoming nightly.
mediumsteak said:
Hey what is CM10.1 JellyBro?
Is it the nightly CM 10,1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same thing as CM10.1 but including cherry picks.
Cherry picks are unmerged features that are currently pending/awaiting approval from CM. They are implemented within Jellybro before official nightlies get them. It is a very stable ROM and uses the same sources as CM. So whatsever in CM10.1 is in Jellybro, just jellybro has extras (very minimal)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2015081 is the thread.
mediumsteak said:
Hey what is CM10.1 JellyBro?
Is it the nightly CM 10,1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check it out ...
JellyBro link
It's basically CM 10.1 with some cherry picks (additions) that either get merged into CM or they are removed because they become obsolete
dmorand said:
I hear that's an issue on the latest nightly. I'm sure they'll address that in the upcoming nightly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's fixed in 12/27.
To elaborate on dmorand,
If cherry picks disappear, it's because they were merged, abandoned or conflict with the current source or other cherry picks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not only because they are 'obsolete' (not really obsolete but abandoned)
I heard from my friend that CM isn't as stable as stock but does have the added features. Can anyone confirm about CM's stability as to stock?
mgkrp said:
I heard from my friend that CM isn't as stable as stock but does have the added features. Can anyone confirm about CM's stability as to stock?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's only the case on devices that weren't made to run aosp android, such as HTC (sense), Samsung (touchwiz), motorolla (motoblur). on nexus devices that natively run stock android, cm works id say 99% perfectly. and usually if there is a "bug" its cosmetic and doesn't affect the functionality of the phone one bit, and once reported by a user it gets fixed pretty fast (within the next few nightlies) :beer:
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Exciting times are ahead of us, the big Rom developers are already making a Rom and new Roms are coming by daily basis it seems.
In this topic we can talk about what Rom we are currently using and what our thoughts are about it.
I'm still using stock oppo Rom, I had a few problems with flashing a new Rom so I gave up.
I will try again in the future, but I'm not sure what Rom I should install.
Verstuurd van mijn X909 met Tapatalk
The cm10 nightlies!
It works perfectly for me, only issue i have is battery life.... I think its even worse than with stock fw....
But considering how far the developers have come in such a short time one can't complain really
I 'm way happier than with my previous s3!
Sent from my Find 5 using xda app-developers app
Just installed PAC-man ROM, and must say i'm very happy with it, fast, nice features and they are updating regularly.
PA all the way! So far I've had zero issues (besides the nonfunctional camera) with the alpha build. In fact, I've been averaging up to an hour more screen on time. Its pretty awesome!
Sent from my Find 5 using xda premium
been running CM10.1 for the past couple days.. no problems but no camera.
kinda hope they update so you can adjust the drawer layout. i hate the 4x4 grid pattern
im running stock rooted waiting for cm 10.1 to fix the camera and the battery life. i have aokp on my galaxy s3 so im kind of an anti-stock user.
:victory: happy with Pac Rom , super smooth and camera all working now ( HDR , Recorder , front camera) . I recommend this because It drains less battery than stock . Best rom until FireFly Project done.
CM Nightles. The only rom that has the camera working. My battery life increased considerably. I'm at 12 hours at 10% with screen on for a little over 3 hours. Looked at the battery half way through the day and found a widget NOM NOM NOM on my battery so uninstalled it at 50% so the battery life is even better.
Stock rom has an issue that I can't live with. Submitting a bug report/feature change on OPPO forums to resolve this. On OEM rom and the phone on Tmo, the radio drops DCH/HSPA+42 quickly versus giving it a little timeout period before scaling out. This coupled with semi aggressive power management keep apps like Spotify from streaming consistently without the screen awake and some additional source of data to keep the phone fully ramped up. It does not exhibit this under CM. Love the phone actually enjoyed the OEM software but I use a lot of my battery life for music consumption. Oppo will get it resolved though. TONS of faith in them based on feedback taken and given.
Latest stock firmware on the weekends and Firefly betas during the week!
sent from my Find 5 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
I´m on Paranoid Android for Find 5
Latest Build of firefly beta
Sent from my X909 using xda app-developers app
Can anyone confirm if Easy Cover is working as it should on custom roms (tried on cm nightlies and it just wakes the phone but dont lock it)
I just loaded ReVolt last evening and it's quite nice. No major issues thus far either. I am a big fan of CM, and find that this has all the options I miss from a fledgling ROM like Oppo's. In time they'll get there.
PAC Rom nightlys. Woking great so far
Latest firefly "ïnternational" beta
I would call it more like an alpha since is 25% or more chinese, stable enough(few freezes), damn pretty but that's all good things about it.
Oppo still didn't fixed the main bugs on this phone like camera autofocus, poor performance in low light and image stabilization, plus the main functions of the phone that shouldn't be bad from start.
CM nightly only.
CM10.1/Oppo Find 5
I am still on the older stock rom, since the last and final update seems
to deal more damage than good.
Still fighting with myself if I should upgrade to Color ROM. Can you guys
recommend it? I am not interested in the newest features, but an
increase of stability would be very welcomed.
Maxwens aokp.
Sent from my Find 5 using xda app-developers app
webbles17 said:
Maxwens aokp.
Sent from my Find 5 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM 10.1 with maxwen Kernel