I was just wondering what advantages does the 2.6.35 based Miui has compared to its predecessor 2.6.32? I find 2.6.32 based Miui pretty neat, fast and stable (not to mention the fact that I can flash it without bricking my phone...again ), what do I gain flashing 2.6.35? I heard the camera is better but what else?
Just wondering, not trying to provoke anyone. Feel free to write your own experiences 'bout these two versions, their advantages and disadvantages etc.
edit: there's a typo in the headline, sorry....
What i've noticed so far in .35 is lower batterylife, and better 3d.
Lower battery life?
It seems odd because I have amazing battery life. Actually, incredible, almost like a new phone. But then others seem to have bad battery life.
I am using RAM manager only and have my CPU freq set to 1.5ghz/800mhz using Smartassv2.
Yesterday, I took my phone off charge at 6.30am, and I made about 4 phone calls, had 3g on all day and at about 7pm my battery was down to 73%. That is some amazing battery.
You must be joking as 32 was better at battery life and other things. For example gps not working even with cm7
Sent from my u8800 using xda premium
julle131 said:
What i've noticed so far in .35 is lower batterylife, and better 3d.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So for a non-gamer you'd recommend 2.6.32 over 2.6.35?
sbasil said:
So for a non-gamer you'd recommend 2.6.32 over 2.6.35?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. You have a bit better battery life, and speaker dies not have random noices when using low volume. Camera is better in .35, but it is not reason good enought for updating.
In finnish:
Jos et pelaa, niin älä turhaan päivitä.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
julle131 said:
Yes. You have a bit better battery life, and speaker dies not have random noices when using low volume. Camera is better in .35, but it is not reason good enought for updating.
In finnish:
Jos et pelaa, niin älä turhaan päivitä.
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No niin vähän ajattelinkin....or as we say in Finnish: "Rodger that"
At the end of the day, do what works for you.
Personally, after installing .35 MIUI and calibrating my battery, I noticed a massive performance boost and noticed the battery was lasting a lot longer. My phone is working much better then before.
But as I said, it can be different for everyone. Some people have noticed the same as me, some people have had it worse.
xpandnz said:
At the end of the day, do what works for you....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And so I did...kind of anyways. The curiosity got the best of me and now I'm on 2.6.35 which is working beautifully so far...Gotta hand it to our devs once again, they make the average cheap u8800 to work at a totally different level compared to the boring stock ROMs.
For me it was a great update. Touchscreen, battery life, speed and camera, are the great improvements that keep me using it, now with the miui rom...
Related
Hi guys,
It's been a week since I installed CM7.0.3. I think I can write down pros and cons of both roms. By the way I tried dk and joker but didn't find them stable.
Here it goes;
Speed:
CM7 hands down. Butter smooth.
Stock rom isn't too bad but lags 0.2 seconds when opening stuff which is a tad annoying. Also laggy with angry birds. (i don't play games, just tried it for testing)
Stability:
CM7 is good but not as stable as stock froyo. Froyo keeps runing and running. CM7 has crashed 3 times in a week.
Battery life:
I am getting 30 hours with CM7. 55 hours with stock froyo. (same cpu speed)
Common Apps:
This is where stock rom wins as well. CM7 Gmaps and Gtalk fonts really suck.
It may not be a big deal for some users but for me it is a big problem as I use these apps at least 5 times a day.
With stock rom skype is unusable. CM7 wins here if you use hands free option.
Radio: (reception)
I can't tell the difference to be fair. wifi, gps, cell. they all feel the same. Stock gps is definitely more battery friendly.
Customization:
CM7 wins again. Stock froyo is not customizable unless you install shed loads of apps on it.
Conclusion:
CM7 is like an aston martin. If you get one you'll have a big grin on your face. On the other hand you'll spend a lot of time waiting for a recovery van on the side of a motorway.
Then stock froyo must be a good old toyota corolla. It always gets you there. Not in style though...
Haha, good comparison.
I would say battery life is pretty similar, not any significant gains over stock rom though I will tone down the cpu frequency further in standby as I have noticed CM7 is better in this aspect.
I would agree with the majority of your comparison though, nice balanced review.
I get good battery life from CM7, because I use SetCPU and smartly set profiles. (low battery=low cpu clock, screen off=low-ish cpu clock...)
nejc121 said:
I get good battery life from CM7, because I use SetCPU and smartly set profiles. (low battery=low cpu clock, screen off=low-ish cpu clock...)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I experienced some problems with setcpu. On low cpu clock setting, when I receive a call it takes 3 rings for the phone to realize it is receiving a call. Which makes me miss lots of calls.
That's a drawback of setting the min speed too low. Which is why I keep it at 245.
BTW, it is not recommended to use SetCPU anymore, because it may clash and cause issues with the default CM Settings. Keeping the governor at Smartass under CM Settings, is equivalent to having a profile in SetCPU for Screen Off.
i like CM7 very much, but with FroYo my battery (with wifi or data on all the time, and juicedeffender) was last for 2 days... now, with wifi (not all day) its like 1 day max.... very disappointing... :\
Nice comparison, I mostly agree to this. I haven't noticed any crashes so far (been using for ~a week now) and my sd card loads faster on reboot.
I really like using CM7, and there's no going back to stock froyo.
I'm running CM7 nightly for quite some time now and I can say it works even better.
Running it overclocked at all times, lasts a day or two depending on how much I stress the phone.
As for camera I flashed the MIUI camera which is a lot better then stock CM7 one, image quality and speed of the app is marvelous.
Just like you said, it's highly customizable; I wouldn't go back to the stock one anytime soon
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
You can say what you want, but for me, even stock rom is faster than CM7, especially in settings menu (scrolling), but of course applications is a different thing (if you have enough patience to find one)..
CM7 looks dull and takes the punch out of user experience.
Battery life is not a issue if it is more than a day.
Ultimately what sells is user experience and hence hTC Sense wins.
you can't compare stock froyo with aosp gingerbread
-SmOgER said:
You can say what you want, but for me, even stock rom is faster than CM7, especially in settings menu (scrolling), but of course applications is a different thing (if you have enough patience to find one)..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, can't agree with that at all.
You just need to run a benchmark app to see cm7 is way faster than stock even without over clocking.
Not sure what you mean by the second part of your post.
AloneInShadow707 said:
I'm running CM7 nightly for quite some time now and I can say it works even better.
Running it overclocked at all times, lasts a day or two depending on how much I stress the phone.
As for camera I flashed the MIUI camera which is a lot better then stock CM7 one, image quality and speed of the app is marvelous.
Just like you said, it's highly customizable; I wouldn't go back to the stock one anytime soon
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey could you send me the link to the camera update???? Thanks!!
I am planning of using the CM 7.0.3 Stable version. Does anyone know how the camera quality is in this version???
ameya88 said:
I am planning of using the CM 7.0.3 Stable version. Does anyone know how the camera quality is in this version???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In a word;
Crap
I find CM nightly builds more stable than the 7.0.3
Differences between Froyo and Gingerbread?
Android.com
It has all the info you need
Things become a lot more streamlined.
What I noticed and liked.
You can now secure you connection when using your internet connection on a laptop or wire less device.
You can now tweak more settings.
The launch pad in the middle.
Silly but I like the battery info a lot better with the labeled graph. That's new, isn't it? Also, netflix, if you aren't boycotting it.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium App
It adds framerate smoothness.
Has a garbage system in games.
TV CRT animation.
Those are basically the main features.
fancy green color in the status bar.
thats basically it.
I honestly didnt feel the difference coming from froyo to GB
the CRT thing is pretty cool, and green colors, yep. greep colors
multitasking is better on GB.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Honestly, for me atleast, depends what GB rom your running. I'm on Simply Honey 3.9 and I love it. I see no reason to stay on froyo unless you use your gps everyday.
Aside from the differences already mentioned above, the main reason why I won't be switching to froyo anymore (even without official GB release from samsung) is the app EQUALIZER...which works only when you're on GB
This makes the phone produce sound quality that trashes froyo anytime of the day. It even makes better sound than DSP manager IMHO And did I mention that the reverb feature is sweet?
cezzarmicu said:
Aside from the differences already mentioned above, the main reason why I won't be switching to froyo anymore (even without official GB release from samsung) is the app EQUALIZER...which works only when you're on GB
This makes the phone produce sound quality that trashes froyo anytime of the day. It even makes better sound than DSP manager IMHO And did I mention that the reverb feature is sweet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
which app is it exactly?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
iynfynity said:
which app is it exactly?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Music eq pro
And gb rooms use 200+ rams on startup while froyo only uses 150+... thats the only con i see.
Up to 50% increase in battery life
roundel77 said:
Up to 50% increase in battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I take it you're not using a vibrant running GB then
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Also, if anyone cares, Netflix and Hulu for Android are supporting platforms that are up on Gingerbread.
Abu-7abash said:
I take it you're not using a vibrant running GB then
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.pluggd.in/samsung-gingerbread-update-for-galaxy-tab-s-ace-fit-mini-gio.-297/
roundel77 said:
http://www.pluggd.in/samsung-gingerbread-update-for-galaxy-tab-s-ace-fit-mini-gio.-297/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
..... seriously? ok so an "official" release of 2.3 "might" increase battery life.But for the current people running 2.3.4 (cm7, miui, simply Honey, revolution, etc) i doubt anyone is getting 50% better battery life over 2.2 least no one i have spoken to. Now thats not to say battery life itself is terrible. it's not, it's adaquate for the average user, and good enough to make 2.3.4 my daily driver, but i personally see about 8-10 hours LESS battery time with most 2.3 roms Vs Froyo stock. But the many other features in 2.3 is where it shines, UI smoothness, gpu and cpu optimization, better streamlining for flash implementation, and better customization options for the UI as a whole. but this is my take on 2.3.4 and i'm personally very satisfied even without my stable gps.
boystuff said:
..... seriously? ok so an "official" release of 2.3 "might" increase battery life.But for the current people running 2.3.4 (cm7, miui, simply Honey, revolution, etc) i doubt anyone is getting 50% better battery life over 2.2 least no one i have spoken to. Now thats not to say battery life itself is terrible. it's not, it's adaquate for the average user, and good enough to make 2.3.4 my daily driver, but i personally see about 8-10 hours LESS battery time with most 2.3 roms Vs Froyo stock. But the many other features in 2.3 is where it shines, UI smoothness, gpu and cpu optimization, better streamlining for flash implementation, and better customization options for the UI as a whole. but this is my take on 2.3.4 and i'm personally very satisfied even without my stable gps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using the Malice 2.3.4 rom right now, It appears to have the same or better battery life than biwinning and zendroid.
boystuff said:
..... seriously? ok so an "official" release of 2.3 "might" increase battery life.But for the current people running 2.3.4 (cm7, miui, simply Honey, revolution, etc) i doubt anyone is getting 50% better battery life over 2.2 least no one i have spoken to. Now thats not to say battery life itself is terrible. it's not, it's adaquate for the average user, and good enough to make 2.3.4 my daily driver, but i personally see about 8-10 hours LESS battery time with most 2.3 roms Vs Froyo stock. But the many other features in 2.3 is where it shines, UI smoothness, gpu and cpu optimization, better streamlining for flash implementation, and better customization options for the UI as a whole. but this is my take on 2.3.4 and i'm personally very satisfied even without my stable gps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Couldn't have said it better
Sent from my SGH-T959 using Tapatalk
Dattack said:
I am using the Malice 2.3.4 rom right now, It appears to have the same or better battery life than biwinning and zendroid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
been looking at Malice, been semi tempted to be honest, but i'm really hooked on miui currently. But i'll prolly give it a shot here in the next week or so, Thanks for the tip
What roms would you guys recomend i use, im currently using Cyangeon Mod 7 but i would like to know if there are any others like that
Thanks Sam
Do you or do you not want blur? If you do want blur, maybe try aura or alien. If you don't, stay with CM.
Try Aura debloat version. Has almost all blur crap removed. Faster than CM7 also except on boot up.
Assimilated via WinBorg 4G
Alien: most stable and best battery life of the roms I've tried
Aura: lean running and most updated of the existing roms, although battery life is slightly worse than Alien. Darkside is really an extension of Aura in my book and it's the rom I currently use.
CM7: I love this rom for all the cool new customizable features, but no fingerprint scanner is a deal breaker. Someone said "some people forget there was life before the fingerprint scanner", well there was life before electricity too. I don't want to give up on one of the most convenient aspect of my phone when there are other alternatives.
I'm using the bionix v1.3.1 with dragon 1.4 kernel, its real fast and smooth on my vibrant
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I dont want blur its a pile of crap i dont see why it was invented,i may try aurara or whatever its called
hey everyone I need help with my battery life cause this is just ridic
, so I'm running my phone on alien with faux123 0.2 kernel
and my radio is N_01.77.33P on bell and I text and facebook quite alot but i'm pretty sure my phone should last for more then 5 hours right? lolol So how do I fic this? Should I try at&t radio that's N_01.77.30P?
Redpill... v4. The new redpill coming out will be based on CM.... it will be sweet
Sent from my atrix running redpill v4 / faux oc'd to 1.3ghz and uv'd.
I hate threads like this and the title makes me hate it even more.
Atrixn00b, try uninstalling facebook, I've heard it screws your battery pretty hard.
also, install watchdog and check if you have any other rogue apps
Does red pill have a big theme base like cm7 and is it as user friendly?
Depends what you use for phone for. All the de-blur roms I used broke contacts and corporate email, sometimes even sms. Seemed like the majority of them took an exisiting rom, removed the blur .apk applications, and broke a lot of usability for some speed.
I think the whole fastest rom thing is a bit of bs. Almost every rom ive ran has been speedy aside from the official 4.5.91, or froyo with all the ATT apps installed.
Alien4 was the last rom and probably the most stable, also the best battery. Speed is terrific, near CM7. All around the best rom imo. Better corporate mail client than CM7 too w/ search functionality.
CM7 was not stable for me but showed a lot of promise, I had dialer issues and some weird app hangs. Felt like I was constantly needing to reboot to get things working again. Looking forward to future releases though.
Okay yh it does break some functionality but blur did do much for me anyways as i just replaced it all with handcent and stuff like that so it doesnt bother me much about lost functionality, but i tried alien and didnt really like it tbh im using cm7 because its what i have been recomended multiple times
-sigh- okay . Ill try uninstalling it. Also what are the values I should uv my phone to?
Sent from my MB860
Atrixn00b said:
hey everyone I need help with my battery life cause this is just ridic
, so I'm running my phone on alien with faux123 0.2 kernel
and my radio is N_01.77.33P on bell and I text and facebook quite alot but i'm pretty sure my phone should last for more then 5 hours right? lolol So how do I fic this? Should I try at&t radio that's N_01.77.30P?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And you posted this question in this thread why???
---------- Post added at 04:05 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:04 PM ----------
Atrixn00b said:
-sigh- okay . Ill try uninstalling it. Also what are the values I should uv my phone to?
Sent from my MB860
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might I add you should stop hijacking this thread and go look elsewhere!
lilhyper said:
Aura: lean running and most updated of the existing roms, although battery life is slightly worse than Alien.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't believe that for a second! I think auras battery is phenomenal as good as any other rom probably even better, but just like any new rom you flash. you gotta callibrate your battery of course or you may have poor performance.
Gutterball said:
I don't believe that for a second! I think auras battery is phenomenal as good as any other rom probably even better, but just like any new rom you flash. you gotta callibrate your battery of course or you may have poor performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't really have poor battery performance. Right now I am at 1 day and 6 hours with 5hr 34min of screen time and battery of 28%. I just mean that when I was on Alien I had slightly better battery life.
I don't keep track of statistics because of generally excellent battery life. However at the end of my work day I find Alien to be slightly better.
Anyway, with the latest Faux kernels battery is phenomenal, I'm not sure how much the minor differences between roms would matter. They generally all have excellent battery life and stability. Many many thanks to Faux and the Aura/Darkside/Alien rom developers.
I changed my radio from 33p to 30p. Now it could use two days one charge.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Thanks guys ill try them out when cm7 stops being a dic
Another Useless thread
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Ok, so currently I have my girlfriend on the CM9 beta 1 build... and it's ok... but it just isn't quite getting the battery life she would like. So here are the priorities:
1. Need longest battery life
2. Stability is second, but most important with things like google music and youtube.
3. General quickness
We both really like CM9, but I am starting to think she is losing battery faster than normal. I would like input from folks that have tried out almost all the roms and have found the best combo that meets the order of priorities listed. I am willing to go with an additional kernel if the advice is sound and compelling.
Thanks in advance... I would really like to get her on a good daily driver.
I think most people will tell u that each device handles things differently resulting in different battery life..
That being said, I think most would agree that our cm9 is probably not the best choice if battery life is a top priority.. personally, I get the best battery life with cm7, I would recomend that, and if u start feeling saucy, throw a custom kernel on there too for undervolting with voltage control.
If she prefers something touchwiz, there's a lot of good options, try gleangb
As always, wipe data cache and dalvik in cwm before flashing her from cm9 to anything gingerbread.
Good luck!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Clean gb
/end thread
+1 clean gb
lbe said:
+1 clean gb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1000...and everything just works.
If it is a woman, cleangb.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Cleangb. For sure
If it is a woman, cleangb.<br />
<br />
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lulz! +1 on that. Clean gb battery life is pretty amazing too.
Miui v4 has been pretty good for me also. Miui gingerbread was some of the best battery life i ever had though.
Running aokp for the past few days, and that seems pretty damn good too. Just got it updated, supercharged, samurai'd and undervolted, so we'll see how the next couple days go.
Lots of choices. Drive em all for a day or two and see which gives you the best mileage.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA
Marcusantrom gets me pretty good battery life, Lasts all day
lbe said:
+1 clean gb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kennyglass123 said:
+1000...and everything just works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1000000 I keep going back to cleanGB-
Wow... thanks everyone... CleanGB it will be. Im curious as to why they have gone over a month with no updates?
I think part of it is there isn't much to update. It's a stripped down, optimized 'cleangb', not '50,000 tweaks, hacks, and new features every 5 minutes gb'.
You stop when you get it right. Certain tweaks react differently on each phone so Toadlife leaves those to the user to decide what is right for them.
Man I haven't been on a tw based ROM in ages!!
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
cleangb might have good battery. but if ur cool, miui gb is the real deal
edufur said:
Wow... thanks everyone... CleanGB it will be. Im curious as to why they have gone over a month with no updates?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The chef for this ROM, (toadlife) hasn't posted anthing on the forums since March 1st. I think he's busy with other things.
Hey all!
Simple question: Does GRAM works on AOSP roms?! Is it a software or a hardware feature?! Or maybe both?!
Thanks!
Life Engineer said:
Hey all!
Simple question: Does GRAM works on AOSP roms?! Is it a software or a hardware feature?! Or maybe both?!
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GRAM is hardware but not sure if need specific software on stock rom to make it works
Life Engineer said:
Hey all!
Simple question: Does GRAM works on AOSP roms?! Is it a software or a hardware feature?! Or maybe both?!
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good Question,
Was wondering this myself
Any opinions on this?
If I had to guess I would think that gram feature is activated through either the rom or kernel, so it probably isnt working on AOSP based ROMs. But thats just a guess due to how the feature activates.
EniGmA1987 said:
If I had to guess I would think that gram feature is activated through either the rom or kernel, so it probably isnt working on AOSP based ROMs. But thats just a guess due to how the feature activates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What makes me confused is some reports in those AOSP roms of better battery life!!! I really highly doubt it!
I've had the S2, S3 and never AOSP gives better battery life than stock roms! I think this also applies to highly optimized software like the one on our LG G2 or HTC one!
Its really a toss up on battery life, no matter what phone. It depends on the feature you use and how they are implemented so no one can say AOSP gives better or Touchwiz gives better, or anything like that. Usually it is the apps within the ROM that give the bad battery life, such as Google Now. Stock GNow is just terrible on battery, and from what I can tell LG didnt do anything to GoogleNow to optimize it or change its function in any way. The Samsung or HTC implementation of it may give better battery life. There are also a lot of rom features in system apps that drain a lot more battery in Touchwiz and Sense than the stock AOSP.
The reason people get better battery on AOSP for this phone right now is because of two reasons:
1) the kernel default speed is 1.5GHz, meaning even at max it wont ever drain as much battery as stock
2) AOSP based ROMs have less bloat in them right now that isnt draining as much battery leading to better idle life.
You are partially right but not completely! Software optimisation has a lot of role in here!
A big example is let's say the HTC one being able to deliver 10hrs of browsing on its modest 2300ma. I dare you that AOSP can't do that!
Also see iPhones which have like 1400ma and have some amazing battery life.
So allow me to say you are wrong! Software optimisation has a lot to do!
Besides when I wrote my last comment it was out of experience and not speculation. I always have the same apps and most of the time touchwiz (although it has more bloatware) had mich bettery life! So NO it's not only about the apps! There's something much deeper than that!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Life Engineer said:
What makes me confused is some reports in those AOSP roms of better battery life!!! I really highly doubt it!
I've had the S2, S3 and never AOSP gives better battery life than stock roms! I think this also applies to highly optimized software like the one on our LG G2 or HTC one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you saying that no custom rom gives better battery life?!
Can't say I agree with that at all. Anytime I've changed a stock blaoted rom for a well put together aosp rom the battery has always been better.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
mgolder said:
Are you saying that no custom rom gives better battery life?!
Can't say I agree with that at all. Anytime I've changed a stock blaoted rom for a well put together aosp rom the battery has always been better.
Sent from my LG-D802 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read my reply above sir!
Anyway that's just not the main issue! The question here is Does GRAM works on AOSP or not?!
It would be great, but i'm afraid we need some developer here. Maybe they can port the script from LG frimwares to use it in other roms. I would buy a beer for that hero!
Life Engineer said:
You are partially right but not completely! Software optimisation has a lot of role in here!
A big example is let's say the HTC one being able to deliver 10hrs of browsing on its modest 2300ma. I dare you that AOSP can't do that!
Also see iPhones which have like 1400ma and have some amazing battery life.
So allow me to say you are wrong! Software optimisation has a lot to do!
Besides when I wrote my last comment it was out of experience and not speculation. I always have the same apps and most of the time touchwiz (although it has more bloatware) had mich bettery life! So NO it's not only about the apps! There's something much deeper than that!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No to being rude, but really doubt that HTC One can deliver 10hrs on browsing. Where did you get this info?
I owned H1 previously, even browsing via wifi, there is no way it could survive that long.
htcm7 said:
No to being rude, but really doubt that HTC One can deliver 10hrs on browsing. Where did you get this info?
I owned H1 previously, even browsing via wifi, there is no way it could survive that long.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No bro no offence taken don't worry!
Here it is: Yes believe your eyes: http://blog.gsmarena.com/htc-one-battery-test-is-complete-results-are-in/
Please post a user than do that, 11 hrs of screen time, here in asop i get 5 a 6 hrs.
Sent from my LG-D802 using xda app-developers app
Still can ´t find answer if GRAM works on AOSP roms. Every AOSP rom has really big drain from screen. On LG stock rom top one draining process is system.
So is it because LG rom is heavy bloated and android system on AOKP is so light that screen is bigger drainer or GRAM really doesn´t work on AOSP roms.