[Q] question about new custom roms - GT540 Optimus General

hi, i want some help with it!
actually i have cyanogenmod gingerbread 2.3.7 with kernel 2.6.29 , by mur4ik
but now i have heard that he is not making or working on it anymore and there are another guys making new things with 2.3.7 for example the swiftdroid second life, or the custom rom made by pete and his friend.
i wanted to know if these ones are better versions than the one i have, or if they are behind it, and if those two are newer and better versions, wich one would you recommend for lg gt 540?,
and another thing, they talk a lot about kernels, really the mur4ik rom i installed was like a package so i really didn't even care about it
but now that are talking about it and wanted to know what is it , and why is better one or another
i heard some of the guys want to puto a .31 kernel instead a .29 and things like that, and well, i really don't know it so well
help with that please, thanks!

Well for kernels look it up on Google a bit too long to explain it here.
For l android 2.1 the best kernel to be used is .29 kernel for 2.2 it would be the .32 kernel and for 2.3 and 4.0(ics) it would be the .35/.38 or 3.0 kernel
As for roms you are using swiftdroid so keep it or then next best thing would be any 2.2 rom I recommend project Utopia but if I where you I will wait for Mike's asop 2.3.7 v6 to come out

I sure am waiting for V6 mike's rom.
For the looks of it i am waiting for mike´s rom V6 it should be fast and stable, just hoping he releases it ASAP....

try Pebe 2.3.7 v5.1 rom, im using it and its quite good!

Yes, the last pcf cm7 (.32) is very good. The only thing that it ends with the battery much faster than for example in pcf aosp 2.2.2 (.32)

Froyo optimum is great too
Amazing battery life and so smooth
Sent from my GT540 using xda premium

sorry to be so silly but,
mike = muraik?
the last one i have from him is v2.0 rc5 swiftdroid based on mur4ik
exactly which one of mike are you telling me about?
if you can post the link to the thread, that'd be nice.

Facuu said:
sorry to be so silly but,
mike = muraik?
the last one i have from him is v2.0 rc5 swiftdroid based on mur4ik
exactly which one of mike are you telling me about?
if you can post the link to the thread, that'd be nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mike =/= mur4ik...
Sent from my LG GT540 Swift

andreas__ said:
Mike =/= mur4ik...
Sent from my LG GT540 Swift
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And Mikes ROMs are in development section like : (roms) all Mikegapinski ROMs in one place
Sent from my LG GT540 Swift

Related

Poll: Which ROM is your favorite?

Please vote for your favourite ROM.
CyanogenMod 7 v1.8 with changed partitions Data and System It is great, we have 245 Mb free internal memory.
Sorry for my bad English
Wystukane z mojego Swifta przy użyciu Tapatalk
Gotta say the same cm7 1.8..the best yet...although the stock version I'm using no data partition just standard,works great! :-d
MY ANDROIDSKY
none, I use my own ROM. I've created from 2.3.3 AOSP and the source from Optimus Chic
neblogas said:
none, I use my own ROM. I've created from 2.3.3 AOSP and the source from Optimus Chic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm confused-did you create a ROM for LG Optimus Chic, or LG GT540 Optimus?
despotovski01 said:
I'm confused-did you create a ROM for LG Optimus Chic, or LG GT540 Optimus?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using AOSP and the source from Optimus Chic I've created a ROM for my GT540. but it is not ready for public release, yet.
swiftdroid
neblogas said:
Using AOSP and the source from Optimus Chic I've created a ROM for my GT540. but it is not ready for public release, yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you tell me from which tutorial you made it please? Me and my brother are trying to build 2.3.3 for our GT540, but we aren't familiar with that. We got the 2.3.3 source though.
I love my modded 2.1 Rom
Root + Overclock + Link2SD -> perfect!
It's not fair Where is my EleganceSwift ?
patryk95juve said:
It's not fair Where is my EleganceSwift ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EleganceSwift is a modded 2.1, right? So, it's the last choice.
Well i liked elegance swift a lot, but i missed all the awesome gingerbread and cyanogenmod features... so i am back to swiftdroid again but it's nice to know that there is an alternative to 2.2 and 2.3
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
neblogas said:
Using AOSP and the source from Optimus Chic I've created a ROM for my GT540. but it is not ready for public release, yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really you can creat ROM 2.3 for GT540? Meaby you can create new CyanogenMod7 and share source code to team CYanogenMod?
Sorry for my English
kriz2000 said:
Really you can creat ROM 2.3 for GT540? Meaby you can create new CyanogenMod7 and share source code to team CYanogenMod?
Sorry for my English
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I(and my brother) am back on the track creating CM7 ROM for our device.
neblogas said:
none, I use my own ROM. I've created from 2.3.3 AOSP and the source from Optimus Chic
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, did you manage to get all features working? Care to share?
We haven't even made the first build, but if everything goes according to plan, the first release will be out soon.
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
I like SwiftDroid. Doesn't tested joestone yet, because it has more bugs, later probably I could switch to his clean aosp. OpenSwift is useless here I think if we have newer build with more features working. Good times for CM6 gone away since SwiftDroid released. Still didn't tested Quarx 2.1 custom rom with probability for OC it to 900MHz and see best results in benchmarks but 2.1 isn't that recent for now.
If you see mistakes in language, sorry, but I don't use translator and still learning english
mesaj said:
I like SwiftDroid. Doesn't tested joestone yet, because it has more bugs, later probably I could switch to his clean aosp. OpenSwift is useless here I think if we have newer build with more features working. Good times for CM6 gone away since SwiftDroid released. Still didn't tested Quarx 2.1 custom rom with probability for OC it to 900MHz and see best results in benchmarks but 2.1 isn't that recent for now.
If you see mistakes in language, sorry, but I don't use translator and still learning english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OpenSwift has bluetooth but no FM. Swiftdroid has FM but no bluetooth. It's all a matter of priority. The performance boost from 2.2 to 2.3 is not that significant.
I tested tried 2.1+ ROMs, and I liked the most Joestone's ROM. It is the fastest and most smooth. I hope Joe will continue his work
Im using quarx 2.1 black with quarz kernel. Should I change?

AOSP or SwiftDroid?

Hi,
I'm currently using SwiftDroid m4. Now I'm not sure whether I should update to RC4 or try out AOSP. Can someone tell me the advantages and disatvantages of each rom? I know, that there are some older threads which deal with this topic. But I think AOSP has developed very fast ind the last few month.
Thanks
G00fY
the best way to find out is to spend an hour or two testing both ROMS to see what you like the best and stick with it
Swiftdroid have Theme Choser, and that is big + for me.. But AOSP is clean and more stable.
droid000 said:
Swiftdroid have Theme Choser, and that is big + for me.. But AOSP is clean and more stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I bought Launcher Pro, so I think that I won't miss the theme choser.
But does AOSP also allows to put quick settings in the pull-down bar at the homescreen? Thats a feature I wouldn't miss.
Yes, eoghan2t7 maby I just try out AOSP and see how it works for me. But why do you use swiftdroid?
An other question: I followed a data2system guide last time before I flashed to swiftdroid m4. Do I need to do it again or how can I use data2system with the latest AOSP??
G00fY2 said:
Well, I bought Launcher Pro, so I think that I won't miss the theme choser.
But does AOSP also allows to put quick settings in the pull-down bar at the homescreen? Thats a feature I wouldn't miss.
Yes, eoghan2t7 maby I just try out AOSP and see how it works for me. But why do you use swiftdroid?
An other question: I followed a data2system guide last time before I flashed to swiftdroid m4. Do I need to do it again or how can I use data2system with the latest AOSP??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes i use swiftdroid rc4 boot from rc5 and havent went back to AOSP since i installed m5
Sent from my GT540 using xda premium
LauncherPro
LauncherPro uses quite alot of memory
I think swiftdroid. It used to be swiftdroid = power aosp = stable but swiftdroid is now very stable and powerful (in my opinion)
Swiftdroid
Swiftdroid is getting more stable than ever
jhonnyx1000 said:
Swiftdroid is getting more stable than ever
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know right!
Whats about the question because of the data2system in my last post?
How have to manage it?

[Q] Daily use stable ROM

Im going to flash a friends GT540 phone but he wants a stable ROM, i know the fastest one would be SDSL but there are still some bugs in it, what ROM should i use? Haven't tried tejas 2.3 ROM, is it stable? Or what other rom should i try? Thanks! :3
Sent from my GT540 using XDA
pahb22 said:
Im going to flash a friends GT540 phone but he wants a stable ROM, i know the fastest one would be SDSL but there are still some bugs in it, what ROM should i use? Haven't tried tejas 2.3 ROM, is it stable? Or what other rom should i try? Thanks! :3
Sent from my GT540 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Utopia 1.0 or swiftdroid asis/sdsl 1.1
Sent from my GT540 using xda premium
The most stable rom with good battery life ( excluding 2.1 roms ) is CM 7.2 by tejas build three.
pahb22 said:
Im going to flash a friends GT540 phone but he wants a stable ROM, i know the fastest one would be SDSL but there are still some bugs in it, what ROM should i use? Haven't tried tejas 2.3 ROM, is it stable? Or what other rom should i try? Thanks! :3
Sent from my GT540 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try the
2.1 Rom.
Sent from my GT540 using XDA
i used many ROMs but tejas builds are awesome for daily use ,
for me i liked CM 7.2 by tejas build TWO , everything in it , fast smooth battery life,,,, just one bug with wifi cant turn on till turn Bluetooth on,
anyways try CM 7.2 by tejas build three
Thanks for the feedback, one last question, what are the differences between 2.1 utopia and 2.3.7 SDSL??
Sent from my LG GT540 using xda app-developers app
pahb22 said:
Thanks for the feedback, one last question, what are the differences between 2.1 utopia and 2.3.7 SDSL??
Sent from my LG GT540 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Utopia 1.0 is good daily rom based on android 2.2 with excellent battery life and stability but it's not good for gaming. Application compatibility is lower than SDSL which is based on android 2.3 and SDSL supports theme choser themes which makes it more customizable. So basically SDSL is better for gaming and for people who needs more customization or want to use certain applications that requires android 2.3. Utopia 1.0 is better if you're looking for stable rom for daily use.
The rom I used for the longest period was PCFighter's V5 with supercharger and and loopy smoothness script. It was the better I've ever tried, stable and fast. Now I'm on ICS, and while I find it faster than GB, I think still isn't enough stable for everyday use if your friend simply wants a phone that work.
EleganceSwift 5.0 , very stable and comfortable rom. Without any tweaks is very fast , and very long battery life (in my phone 3-4 days without wifi )

HTC Desire Fanboy wants to boost girlfriends Galaxy S - need advices

Hi guys,
i know that Thread is kind of lazy but my girlfriends Galaxy S1 (Stock 2.3 ROM not rooted) is soooo damn slow and i wanna help her with a new ROM,Kernel etc...
Myself is using the newest ICS Release on my HTC Desire but i readed and informed me everyday for best performance.
At the HTC Desire topic im very well-informed but the Samsung topic is extremly new for me...so only thing i did : Stock 2.2 to Stock 2.3
(Kies is bull**** xD ?!?!)
I would like to root my girlfriends Droid but i dont know which ROM or Kernel should i chose...there are sooo much.
Because of that...guys: Whats the best, smoothest and especially stable ROM (especially for girls^^) whatever Gingerbread or ICS...i think JB is not smooth enough like on Desire :/ (too much issues etc)
It would be pretty if someone could help me so that i can boost the performance of my girlfriends phone on the best and stable way.
THX
Try stock android 2.3.6 ZSJW4. Root it with CF Root and she will be fine. Very stable and smooth with no bugs. Yoy can find it on Sammobile.com
For Gingerbread I recommend the Samsung stock roms, which are pretty stable.
See this thread for official GB firmwares from Samsung (includes also a guide for flashing stock roms with Odin).
See this thread for CF-Root, a basic rooted kernel for stock GB roms (it's the stock kernel with added su binary, SuperUser app and CWM recovery).
See this thread for Semaphore, an extended kernel for stock GB roms.
I only tried Cyanogenmod 9 as ICS rom so I can't recommend any other ICS rom, but CM9 is pretty stable (I'm using RC2 atm and have no big problems). To install CM9 or other ICS based roms, you need to install CF-Root or Semaphore first (through Odin), to get CWM recovery.
thx guys, but
@ c_codrut: i don't think that TouchWiz is a good choice...because its still boring and slowly
@stbenz: thanks for your informations, i will look at this. But im intrest about the CM9 Stuff on Galaxy S
I also use CM9 for my desire but its not officially supported...its an ROM from xda (DK-Zero) and its know very stable and without any big issues.
But i used it since 2012/04..and at this time it was very buggy...no mic no camera etc...for me no problem but for her xD not acceptable^^
But my problem is that myself can fix problems on my device and can live with it...but i dont want that my girlfriend need help with every update or something else...she should use the ROM as an almost stable and for daily-usable ROM.
I know that i should or could test it but its not my device and i couldn't walk all day with it^^ (hope you understand this )
It would be cool, if see could use ICS by CM or what about the AOKP ? (i missed that for my desire :/)
So best thing would be a almost stable ICS ROM....i/she dont need that Samsung UI i guess.
CM9 RC2 (from 2012-07-19) or the Nightly (from 2012-08-07) ?
or what about AOKP (Milestone 6) ?
cm9 + latest devil kernel :highfive:
AOKP milestone 6, semaphore 1.3.0s kernel. Fast, stable and she‘ll have unicorns.
sent from a telephonic device
Try Cm9 Rc2 very stable
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
With cm9 all hardware works except for fm radio. Some are reporting, that the latest nightlies are more stable than rc2, but thats most likely because bugfixes for bugs reported for rc2 are already merged to the nightlies. But I also think we are not far away from the next rc/final version, so if you don't want to flash too often, you could wait for the next rc/final version.
yahyoh said:
cm9 + latest devil kernel :highfive:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This guy knows what he is saying. Use CM9 RC2 and Devil Kernel and you got yourself a blazingly fast winner!
ok, guys THX!!!
i will start with CM9RC2...was my favorite anyway
And when i update the ROM ...does it works like on Desire (wiping cache and dalvik) installing newest RC or Nightly?
Or the Kernels needs often to be update?
Hey, I am using this ROM and I can only say it is extremely good, a real revelation after using Froyo and GB. I had some issues with CM9 but it was also great and superfast. i9000 with ICS is like a completely new phone!
Hope this helped a bit.
Pritti said:
ok, guys THX!!!
i will start with CM9RC2...was my favorite anyway
And when i update the ROM ...does it works like on Desire (wiping cache and dalvik) installing newest RC or Nightly?
Or the Kernels needs often to be update?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel gets flashed every time you install an update, so if you have an alternative kernel, you have to flash it again every time you flash a new CM9 version. You also have to flash gapps after every update.
Girls will like MIUI ROM. Its beautiful and have custom theme... try it out.
ksavai said:
Girls will like MIUI ROM. Its beautiful and have custom theme... try it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Eww iPhone look :thumbdown:
Cm9 and aokp have themes engine too
sent from another galaxy
Hi guys...im back and finished my work
I rooted with Odin and hopefully with the correct Kernel.After that i made a NAND-Backup.
So i wiped everything and flashed CM9 RC2 and the Gapps...and everything was smooth and cool
But so far i didn't flashed the devilkernel yet...the CM-kernel seems ok.
So my question whats the Pros and Cons of the Devil-kernel compared to the CM-builtin-Kernel?
I think batterylife is important than extreme power and high batteryloss, i guess for her ^^
BTW: To make CM more female, i installed a pink theme and a pink clock widget for my girlfriend, she's happy now
And again guys...THANKS...it was very interesting to flash and root an other device (brand) and i saw the differences, Pros and Cons!
In my opinion Rooting on desire was easier and not needed as much informations and readings ^^
I hope she get no big problems but i not averse to work on her device too^^
And im jealous that her ROM runs so stable...on Desire its also stable but the Videocam doesnt work ...damn :crying: (very choppy)
But there isn't a official CMsupport or 100% HWA
i don't know about the devils kernel, but i can definitely recommend the ICS semaphore kernel http://forum. xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1468795
just remove the spaces.
using the smartassV2 govenor, etc, my phone's battery lasts about a day longer than it did on the cm9 kernel
Ok, i also use this governor on my desire and an extra sleep state governor
...the smartass v2 rocks !!!!
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
dhurk said:
Try Cm9 Rc2 very stable
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
edit: CM9 stable is now out. So that's a no brainer.
http://get.cm/?device=galaxysmtd&type=stable
woooow nice THX...but lol...i finished my work 2 days before xD
So is it possible to flash the stable Version over the RC2?without any negative aspects?!
The update process is like desire? wiping Cache and dalvik an flash the New Version?
Sry for these noob question but i want a good running system for my girl and cannot test the system many days like on my device
Sent from my HTC Desire using xda app-developers app
You just flash the stable over RC2, flash the google apps, and that's it. No need to wipe anything. If in doubt, make a nandroid backup before flashing.

New to the Defy - most recent stable rom

Hi,
I've picked up a motorola defy, and am wondering what is the most recent e.g ICS, rom that is stable and everything works?
So far i've rooted the phone and that's about it.
It's a 2.51 UK phone.
I'm familiar with the HTC Desire S roms, but haven't a clue when it comes to the Defy.
I've searched through the dev forum, but can't quite get an indication of what's what.
Sorry for the noob question.
Thanks for any replies.
Did you maybe already found out if it has green (SOC) lens or red (bayer) lens camera module? SOC only works on Froyo kernels, while bayer works on both Froyo and Gingerbread kernels. (Which is not of great importance, cause almost all ROM's are available for both kernels)
Anyways... What do you like? Here are some of my recommendations...
For MIUI v2 - Pikachu MIUI (WIUI comes 2nd, as Pikachu had fewer bugs for me and was overall snappier)
For MIUI v4 - WIUI v4
For CM7(.2) - maniac103's builds or FuZZ's KANG's - almost the same, but details do make them different
For CM9 - Epsylon3 made the latest CM9 builds with the final fixes and touches
For AOKP ICS - There's a Milestone 6 coming up soon, built by Kayant (he's building from source, port's can't compare with that)
For JellyBean - I must say I would recommend ParanoidAndroid, which is based on CMX, but somehow manages to be snappier and much better at RAM management. AOKP JP alpha is snappy, too, when compared to CMX. Although the CMX I'm talking about is the one build by Quarx, but people do say tha Epsylon's builts are better performance-wise.
Thanks.
From the looks of my lens it's bayer.
Are any of those roms a default/minimal ice cream sandwich? That's all i'm after really, as I guess jelly bean will have loads of stuff not working correctly yet.
Actually CM10 is working as good as CM9, maybe better. But I must say, I switched to CM10 since the 2nd nightly, and never went back to CM9, so maybe there was an improvement since that in CM9 nightlys...
But you should try them all and choose which you like
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
x0149128 said:
Thanks.
From the looks of my lens it's bayer.
Are any of those roms a default/minimal ice cream sandwich? That's all i'm after really, as I guess jelly bean will have loads of stuff not working correctly yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you say minimal, I'm assuming you mean feature-wise, not GUI-wise, so I guess the best choice for you would be to wait up for AOSP Jelly Bean which Kayant is trying to build from source here - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1824551
If you don't want Jelly Bean, but ICS, then I think this is the way to go - CM9 Moto Ice Gun - http://www.custom-android.de/portfolio/cm9-motoicegun-edition/ (you can find it in the defy development forum, too). Most of the guys who tested it claim that it's the fastest ICS ROM for the Defy.
niksy+ said:
When you say minimal, I'm assuming you mean feature-wise, not GUI-wise, so I guess the best choice for you would be to wait up for AOSP Jelly Bean which Kayant is trying to build from source here - http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1824551
If you don't want Jelly Bean, but ICS, then I think this is the way to go - CM9 Moto Ice Gun - http://www.custom-android.de/portfolio/cm9-motoicegun-edition/ (you can find it in the defy development forum, too). Most of the guys who tested it claim that it's the fastest ICS ROM for the Defy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i still think , that CM9 is the most stable rom for defy
CM9 is fatser then GB , ICS if definitely better then GB in all terms
so a recent stable rom - CM9 .
but in near future , if TI releases proper SGX drivers for our devices .. then , m sure CM10 will be the most stable rom for defy .
IMHO I would choose CM10
What Kayant is doing isn't pure AOSP. It has some fixes!
I was talking with Quarx recently and he said that CM10 is very similar to pure AOSP..so trust me...go CM10
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
I've given AOKP ICS milestone 5 a go.
Seems to be lacking polish compared to the HTC ICS roms with sense 3.6 - I guess that's something i'm going to have to get used to. I don't like his boot screen either.
When I say minimal i mean without a bunch of pre-installed stuff like games, twitter etc..
Boot screen can be changed for one you like
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
x0149128 said:
I've given AOKP ICS milestone 5 a go.
Seems to be lacking polish compared to the HTC ICS roms with sense 3.6 - I guess that's something i'm going to have to get used to. I don't like his boot screen either.
When I say minimal i mean without a bunch of pre-installed stuff like games, twitter etc..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All ROMs are minimal then!
They come only with essential apps preinstalled (DSP manager, HWA Settings and FM Radio) + default ROM ones (phone..camera...you know)
This is app set up for CM10
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
Go for cm10
Go for CM10..i have been using it since the first nightly of quarx..
i would recommend you to try quarx builds ...because it is updated frequently..
go for pa 2.0. It is stable
Walking dead said:
go for pa 2.0. It is stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pa 2.0 is based on Quarx ROMs!
Plus Pa doesn't have working tether like Quarx build
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
ppero196 said:
Pa 2.0 is based on Quarx ROMs!
Plus Pa doesn't have working tether like Quarx build
Sent from my MB525 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't have working tether since CM9 from Quarx or E....
I don't know whether I'm using BL6 kernel (2.3.6) on Defy which cause this problem.
Also, since CM9, I can't play myTV (apps from TVB) live broadcast.
Anyone can help to try it on your CM9/10? Here is the apps:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.quickplay.tvbmytv
Quarx,no doubt, he develops this. Anyways, if it includes some apps you don't want or some to add simply do this with an archiver manager on computer...
Hi all!
What stable ROM do you guys recommend for Defy green lens? I recently installed the most stable CM7 and I like but there are some thing I don't quite like, like the incompatibility with Titanium backup, the vibration issue for notifications, and the battery life didn't improve significantly. So, I am looking for the one but without having to flash 7-8 roms, that where you guys coming in, which rom out there is the best and stable for defy green lens?
And if you could include a download link would be great, because I encountered so many sites with links and versions and rom and kernels, and this and that, that is confusing for a newbie like me.
Thank you!
V
act_tony said:
Hi all!
What stable ROM do you guys recommend for Defy green lens? I recently installed the most stable CM7 and I like but there are some thing I don't quite like, like the incompatibility with Titanium backup, the vibration issue for notifications, and the battery life didn't improve significantly. So, I am looking for the one but without having to flash 7-8 roms, that where you guys coming in, which rom out there is the best and stable for defy green lens?
And if you could include a download link would be great, because I encountered so many sites with links and versions and rom and kernels, and this and that, that is confusing for a newbie like me.
Thank you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You could try with cm11, goes very well, but has some bugs with bluetooth, calls and other stuff, you could try the 20-01-14 build, or you can try the latest build of cm10.2 by quarx
Sent from my MB526 using Tapatalk
some
DiegoxG said:
V
You could try with cm11, goes very well, but has some bugs with bluetooth, calls and other stuff, you could try the 20-01-14 build, or you can try the latest build of cm10.2 by quarx
Sent from my MB526 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your answer. I will try that. I have another issue though last night I charged my phone, today it was at 98% well I went online to check my email and the battery went from 98% to 5% like in 7 minutes, and the main reason I flashing my phone was because battery life, I guess the joke was on me! :crying:
act_tony said:
Thank you for your answer. I will try that. I have another issue though last night I charged my phone, today it was at 98% well I went online to check my email and the battery went from 98% to 5% like in 7 minutes, and the main reason I flashing my phone was because battery life, I guess the joke was on me! :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your battery is quite old, or give the try to cm11 or 10.2 and tell us
DiegoxG said:
I think your battery is quite old, or give the try to cm11 or 10.2 and tell us
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both, lol, my battery is 2+ years old and I should try CM10.
From all the CM10 and 11 what version is the most stable? If I flash it could I go back to stock eventually? (keep in mind that I have a Defy green lens) because if these custom roms don't work quite as smooth I think I'm going to ended up flashing the stock rom.
Diego, Thanx for all the help!

Categories

Resources