I'm scoring really low quadrant scores...13-1400 range, which is lower than my thunderbolt. Any idea why it would be so low? It runs fine, I just found that odd.
Related
When recording video with Cupcake, what framerate are people getting for their videos? You do get the framerate by going to Gallery. Long click on the video and select info. I'm only seeing 4-9 frame/sec. I think it's because my memory card is class 6. Thanks.
I've seen frame rates range from 19fps to 4fps. I've found that videos of well lit areas or outdoors produce higher frame rates.
I got 19 fps (outdoor shot)
/Mats
The brighter it is, the shorter the required exposure and therefore the higher the framerate that is possible. If its so dark that you need a 2 second exposure, you'll only get at best 1/2 fps.
Does anyone know of the ISO sensitivity of the camera is adjustable? If someone could figure that out, I bet the still camera AND video recording would be faster. I've seen the ISO adjust a little, but not much.
Max frame rate is locked at 20. A note in the source says anything higher and it becomes unstable.
but why? the cpu can handle up to 8mpix still and 30fps recording video afaik oO
The framerate I'm usually ok with, it's not great but usually 15+ which is decent. The resolution (CIF, 352x288) and video quality (super compressed mp4/H.263) blows chunks though. Absolutely horrible and a disgrace for a smartphone in 2009, it's as bad as my three year old Samsung U600 dumbphone. A two year old Nokia N82 can at least shoot video at VGA resolution and use less video compression, at up to 30 FPS, despite a much slower processor. I can't express how disappointed I am. Is the camera and/or hardware in the Dream really that bad or is this a software thing?
In other words, this is merely a software incapability, not a hardware issue. Meaning, I'm sure one day we will be able to see significantly increased video quality and so forth.
Hello,
I am noticing that my Iconia does not have good 3d/gpu performance. Portrait mode switching between homepages is sluggish and quadrant 3d tests provide very low framerates (much worse than my galaxy s). Overall scores vary around 2000. I am running Acer_A500_1.016.03_com_gen1. The games also work ok, but I would expect better framerates.
Does anyone else experience this? What firmwares are you running?
Thanks!
Stock M7. Wow this thing is fast, it barely dropped below 60fps at any time. My N10 is around 51.
joe2316 said:
Stock M7. Wow this thing is fast, it barely dropped below 60fps at any time. My N10 is around 51.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try ultra high settings
Btw there's a new Ultra High settings You'll be happy to average 40fps there
ArmedandDangerous said:
Btw there's a new Ultra High settings You'll be happy to average 40fps there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
High performance on the One = 56.3 FPS
S4 (i9500) = 59.7 FPS
but wow, it sounds fantastic on the One.
Rate this thread to express how you think the 's Wifi performs. A higher rating indicates that it has excellent range, throughput, and signal strength. Like when you're taking a dump in the bedroom upstairs, do your videos have to buffer or do they come through without interruption?
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I wish the wifi will not end up like my mate 9 problem.
Unable to access to internet during peak hour (9PM - 1AM) everday for 2.4G network - on all routers no matter how I change the channel......
Seems pretty good to be honest. Can't really fault it, it works.
5ghz wifi doesn't work for me.
It finds those networks but just won't connect.
I've heard it from other people as well.
got mine yesterday. WiFi is on my girlsfriends S9+ definetly better. Just gotta the half on strenght with the Mate 20 Pro
5ghz wireless AC working well.
I noticed that it wouldn't connect to any WiFi that was previously saved when restoring from Google backup... I had to forget and add them again
LOGMD said:
5ghz wireless AC working well.
I noticed that it wouldn't connect to any WiFi that was previously saved when restoring from Google backup... I had to forget and add them again
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's pretty good Imho. I see people complaining that this speed isn't enough and It should be faster. Your phone's not a PC downloading 50gb files. You barely browse and watch video. Heck. 4k only needs 25-30mbps and 1080 is 10mbps.
leo72793 said:
That's pretty good Imho. I see people complaining that this speed isn't enough and It should be faster. Your phone's not a PC downloading 50gb files. You barely browse and watch video. Heck. 4k only needs 25-30mbps and 1080 is 10mbps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its hitting the cap of my power line network, it can probably do more lol. Yeah max is stream a 1080p video whole downloading a Spotify album. Max 30mbps throughput at one time for real usage.
Anyone here know what the TRP is for the Huawei Mate 20 Pro? https://www.signalbooster.com/blogs/news/does-smartphone-make-and-model-impact-cellular-signal
Recent tests by Ireland's communications regulator (COMREG) have shown that the Samsung Galaxy S8 has incredible reception, which is measured in TRP (Total Radiated Power). On the GSM network's 1800 band, the Galaxy S8 weighed in at 23.6 TRP (also shown as "dBm"), while the iPhone 7 only had 16.6 TRP, and the Pixel had 21.0 TRP. This means that Samsung cell phones have the strongest antenna capability. We don't exactly know how or why - maybe just due to how they design their smartphones.
It isn't hitting the cap of my internetconnection like my Samsung note 8 did, but somewhere around 70% of the max speeds. Still speedtest around 350/350Mbps up and down, where the note got 630. But not complaining, the reception is good and consistent.
For a really crude, non quantifiable or scientific test I put my Mate 20 Pro side by side with my work S10e to see how 5GHz wifi and performance differs. Same connection etc. Both phones have 6Gb RAM. On small stuff for instance, the M20P updates apps way faster than the S10e from Google Play. I give the S10e a headstart and the Mate 20 P still beats it. This is a regular occurence. It looks like not only does it download the data faster but it installs it faster too.
Different story on a really large update, for instance maps for TomTom, the two phones were pretty much the same. Maybe a thing with speed getting the data off the TomTom server? Or the work wifi router I'm connected to balances the throughput with a large download? Not sure. The Mate did seem to accelerate the download to a good lead initially but then the S10e caught up later. The update for the Mate was 100mb larger and finished installing maybe 30 seconds behind. 1.1Gb for S10e and 1.2Gb for the Mate 20P.
Would you say that the Sony Xperia 5 II is "fast" in day-to-day use? A higher rating indicates that you think the Sony Xperia 5 II exhibits fantastic performance. Like, is it as fast as your tears when you watch The Titanic?
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Just fast. Once you go 120Hz there's no turning back. Butter smooth everywhere!
The phone is very quick and responsive. I agree that once you turn on the 120Hz refresh rate, you'll quickly get used to it. The phone has excellent battery life, so I just leave the 120Hz on. It easily makes it through the whole day, so why not?
I actually do not see a noticeable difference between 60 and 120 Hz, so I just leave it at 60 Hz.
Overall speed is lovely only the cam sucks (too slow).
XperiAve said:
I actually do not see a noticeable difference between 60 and 120 Hz, so I just leave it at 60 Hz.
Overall speed is lovely only the cam sucks (too slow).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Impossible, 120Hz is a lot more fluid than 60Hz
XperiAve said:
I actually do not see a noticeable difference between 60 and 120 Hz, so I just leave it at 60 Hz.
Overall speed is lovely only the cam sucks (too slow).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here for refresh rate. On camera part though I use more of Photo Pro and just getting the hang of it(The way to get control over photos is awesome!)
Federico Bonomo said:
Impossible, 120Hz is a lot more fluid than 60Hz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I too don't see much difference in scrolling but definitely it drains battery a lot so I also kept the toggle off.