Related
What ROM should i use for little battery drain ?
3 days with 20% right now using froyobread. Normal use, WWW little gamING calls and sms. With floyo i got the same
Sent from my X8 using XDA Premium App
I have the WIFI connection problem with the FroyoBread, i mean i can't connect to wireless networks...but i will sacrifice if the ROM is not draining so much battery.
Mine has some issue in floyobread v12 battery drain...but over all its a best custom rom that i try from many others...but if can make it very less drain in battery it would be 100%..
please update info with last roms...which is best battery drain rom at the moment? gingerDXv15, GingerXperiav007 or gingerCyBorgv003?are froyo-based roms cheaper on battery than gingerbread-based roms?
i'm using fxp rom with their oc'ed kernel and i lost only 4% in cca 14 hours
which one is fxp?
I used gingercyborg yesterday so far the battery is good but some bugs i encounter. Today im using gingerdx v15 is installed the module of dx. I used smart ass gov.. so far i have problem in battery draining.
Sent from my X8 using XDA App
chemicalbuz said:
which one is fxp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=973753
it's cyanogenmod port by FreeXperia Team
Well I don't no where to start really as I know I will get told off for making a new thread about battery life!
But this is hopefully some help for people out there that are trying to get a decent ROM and kernel to improve your battery life, well mine has really improved since flashing my Samsung GS2 with Lite'ning ROM 6.1 and flashing the kernel with SpeedMOD T-40.
I have spent lots of hours reading forums about battery life, I think I have tried everything known to man about this phone, somethings worked well somethings didn't, I wanted to get a decent battery life with out sacrificing any features I love about my phone!
When I got into rooting, about 2 months ago I was a n00b, but I stuck to it and learnt a lot each day, it's not easy and you can't expect someone to tell you how to do it, you have to read up about it like everyone else!
But anyway back to why I've created a new thread, well after installing Lite'ning ROM 6.1 at the beginning of the week which I really like as it keeps the Samsung software, I've used TB Pro to freeze the Hubs as I don't use them, the battery life wasn't what I thought, in fact I think I got a better battery life with the stock rom unrooted
I did some researching and found that the kernel can make a difference to (I'm still learning) so after reading some forums I learnt that speedmod kernel worked well with Lite'ning ROM, as It was just the kernel that came with the ROM, ninphetamine 2.0.5, so I flashed the kernel last night with Odin and within minutes I was back up and running.
I then charged the phone 100% and then use a battery calibrator app to wipe battery stats, I then did a basic test which I previously did before, I went to sleep with a fully charged phone, I left everything on: WIFI, mobile data network and sync on set my alarm clock and went to sleep (p.s I checked a few websites so battery actually went down to 98%)
8 hours later I woke up checked my phone to see what % it was left one, previously on stock ROM with same set up my phone would be on 65% due to the Android OS bug running high! This time it was on 91%, so that's less than 1% drain an hour! Happy or what!
I know some people might not say this was a actual battery test but to me it is and I can see a big difference, funny thing is the AOS was showin 35% in batt stats, which is strange!
Now as I write this at 1pm my phone has been on for 14hrs and I'm still at 75%, yes I know the first 8 hrs was in standbye, but I've had a lot of notifications come through from G+ this morning and I'm pretty happy with what I have got set up now, without compromise as well!
I will upload a screen shot later if any wants to see when my battery stats when its down to 1% etc
I hope his helps some people out there, but I wanted to keep it simple for some as I was once a n00b (might still be)
Better change your title.. when i first saw it i thought you are asking how to have a good battery life.. just a suggestion
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
ephraim033 said:
Better change your title.. when i first saw it i thought you are asking how to have a good battery life.. just a suggestion
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just done, thanks for that
ephraim033 said:
Better change your title.. when i first saw it i thought you are asking how to have a good battery life.. just a suggestion
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Want good battery life!!!" - I believe the OP is ordering the reader to demand better battery life. I agree with the OP. Let's start "Occupy Samsung" movement.
thanks for this thread. i will definitely try it later after some playing around with CM7
@Maverik: Np dude.. glad to help
@Kreo: basing in OP's statement and the last part of it, he is stating how to get a better battery life instead of demanding for it..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Op, do you have auto sync on?
No worries, I thought that if it helped me its going to help more ppl.
What's CM7 like, you trying the stable or the nightly?
chiefroastbeef said:
Op, do you have auto sync on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I do and background data.
ephraim033 said:
@Maverik: Np dude.. glad to help
@Kreo: basing in OP's statement and the last part of it, he is stating how to get a better battery life instead of demanding for it..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm still relatively new to posting, but thanks again
maverick1103 said:
No worries, I thought that if it helped me its going to help more ppl.
What's CM7 like, you trying the stable or the nightly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am the stable. its snappy and i liked the different look and feel with other roms that i hv tried such as litening, villain, batista and stock.
Today i installed setcpu and will see how the battery will perform.
norbu23 said:
I am the stable. its snappy and i liked the different look and feel with other roms that i hv tried such as litening, villain, batista and stock.
Today i installed setcpu and will see how the battery will perform.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool, I did try CM7 but it was a nightley, build 68 I think, if they had brought the stable version out a week earlier I would be on that now, but I hear there are still bugs?
At least with Lite'ning its completely stable plus I like the look of the neon blue effect
My battery is on 64% now, I think I can go 2 days with this now
I'm on CM 7.1 Stable now and now even after 2 days i still have almost 40% battery left out, though on stock i never got more then 1 days
funtoosh said:
I'm on CM 7.1 Stable now and now even after 2 days i still have almost 40% battery left out, though on stock i never got more then 1 days
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not bad, which Kernel are you using, the default one?
I have 5% left and going to screen shot it at 1% to show ppl what they can get, bearing in mind I could get max 12hrs out of it before!
1 day 9 hrs so far brilliant if you ask me!
maverick1103 said:
That's not bad, which Kernel are you using, the default one?
I have 5% left and going to screen shot it at 1% to show ppl what they can get, bearing in mind I could get max 12hrs out of it before!
1 day 9 hrs so far brilliant if you ask me!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I first rooted it with superoneclick and it downloaded odin and flashed some insecure kernel first and then rooted it
Then i just installed CM 7.1 with Rom Manager, not sure which kernel is it
if you are gonna try cm7 try the latest nightly build....thats pretty more stable than the "stable" version...i think build 83 is out today and that will have pretty much more bug fixes and i hope they can get that browser lag fixed and thats pretty done deal for me to switch over to that completely
funtoosh said:
I first rooted it with superoneclick and it downloaded odin and flashed some insecure kernel first and then rooted it
Then i just installed CM 7.1 with Rom Manager, not sure which kernel is it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you installed with ROM manager that will be the generic one that comes with it, check in about phone its second from bottom.
Matriak31 said:
if you are gonna try cm7 try the latest nightly build....thats pretty more stable than the "stable" version...i think build 83 is out today and that will have pretty much more bug fixes and i hope they can get that browser lag fixed and thats pretty done deal for me to switch over to that completely
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't keep up with the nightleys plus when I tried build 68 I think it was, camera didn't work at all. Is the latest much better?
Also which Android version is it based on?
Happy!
So as promised here are screen shots of my phone running at 1%, I forgot to screen shot CPU spy as well (sorry) but I can say that with this set up I am really happy, as I cannot remember when with general use I have managed to get over a day with out charging my phone, iPhone 4 included!
If there is a better set up out there with a newer ROM I would be interested as this is based on 2.3.4 tho Google Talk video works so I'm happy
maverick1103 said:
So as promised here are screen shots of my phone running at 1%, I forgot to screen shot CPU spy as well (sorry) but I can say that with this set up I am really happy, as I cannot remember when with general use I have managed to get over a day with out charging my phone, iPhone 4 included!
If there is a better set up out there with a newer ROM I would be interested as this is based on 2.3.4 tho Google Talk video works so I'm happy
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
man that os is very high....but you still managed to get a day out of it so not bad work buddy..
nightly there is a new one coming out today version 83...still few bugs they need to sort out but once that is done il be on there...that firmware is based on 2.3.7.
im using speedmod latest kernel..it does not support bln or bootlogo but i would sacrifice all that for a decent battery life which i am getting....so far 5 and half hours past and im down to 75% and 2hours screen on time....not bad i think
Hi Guys,
What would ye recommend for the best kernal to put on with AOKP? Guess im looking for battery life rather than hugh performance, although i dont want it to be really laggy.
ricochet69 said:
Hi Guys,
What would ye recommend for the best kernal to put on with AOKP? Guess im looking for battery life rather than hugh performance, although i dont want it to be really laggy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
huh??? theres only one kernel that can used for AOKP and if you're using AOKP you're running it. you gotta do some reading up bro. AOKP is an ICS rom. but anyways. even if you weren't running AOKP there's only one kernel developer (pershoot) so far for the galaxy tab 10.1.
You always have the option of using a popcorn kernel. Not sure how that compares to the stock kernel or pershoot's kernel, but since it's really the only other option, I'd say give it a try. Best with melted butter.
I experienced really fast battery drain on pershoot's kernel. I don't have evidence to prove it and at the same time don't want to diss pershoot's work and there is a big chance that I might be wrong but that is what I witnessed.
that's why I stuck with stock based kernel's right now.
slack04 said:
You always have the option of using a popcorn kernel. Not sure how that compares to the stock kernel or pershoot's kernel, but since it's really the only other option, I'd say give it a try. Best with melted butter.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The popcorn kernel sucks until rooted and modded by heat.
sorry couldn't help myself like you couldn't.
As far as seriously, it all depends on how you configure and use Pershoots kernel as to if you'll experience lessened battery life enough to be bothered by it.
If you can read this it was sent using my GT-P7510.
task650 said:
huh??? theres only one kernel that can used for AOKP and if you're using AOKP you're running it. you gotta do some reading up bro. AOKP is an ICS rom. but anyways. even if you weren't running AOKP there's only one kernel developer (pershoot) so far for the galaxy tab 10.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya man i know its an ICS rom but just flashed it for the galaxy nexus on friends phone and put a different kernal, was just wondering if there was different ones for the Tab. looking at the comments below it seems best to go with the kernal packaged with AOKP was just wondering if there was a better one. Thanks every one for your help.
kernel hero = Preshoot
ricochet69 said:
ya man i know its an ICS rom but just flashed it for the galaxy nexus on friends phone and put a different kernal, was just wondering if there was different ones for the Tab. looking at the comments below it seems best to go with the kernal packaged with AOKP was just wondering if there was a better one. Thanks every one for your help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At this very moment we only have preshoot's ICS kernel available for GT 10.1 since he is the only one involved in kernel development but we would all love to see more developers jumping into the Kernel Wagon!
But sincerely speaking ......... I think preshoot's kernel would give anyone good battery life if they do not have over-clocking on.
davsarus said:
I experienced really fast battery drain on pershoot's kernel. I don't have evidence to prove it and at the same time don't want to diss pershoot's work and there is a big chance that I might be wrong but that is what I witnessed.
that's why I stuck with stock based kernel's right now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pershoot's ICS kernel or HC?
I always had good battery life with Pershoot's kernel on HC. Actually, not just good - great.
However, so far, CM9 is a poor battery performer. I've got a suspicion why (I think it's the same wifi power management bug I experienced on the Galaxy S II with some firmwares) but I haven't had time to confirm.
If it's not the bug I'm thinking of, it'll be a ***** to debug - high drain despite good deep sleep percentages is really difficult to solve. (Basically, something is failing to power down in deep sleep.)
Maybe more info this weekend when I have time to get a kernel tree synced and building for the 10.1.
I think there were two reasons no other kernel developers have done much with the 10.1:
1) Until Heimdall supports the 10.1, developing kernels for it is a bit of a pain in the ass (Edit: If you have a retail Tab - the I/O Tabs had fastboot...)
2) Pershoot does a damn good job - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. There's only two features I miss that aren't present in the kernel, and they weren't worth the hassle of maintaining my own fork.
Entropy512 said:
Pershoot's ICS kernel or HC?
I always had good battery life with Pershoot's kernel on HC. Actually, not just good - great.
However, so far, CM9 is a poor battery performer. I've got a suspicion why (I think it's the same wifi power management bug I experienced on the Galaxy S II with some firmwares) but I haven't had time to confirm.
If it's not the bug I'm thinking of, it'll be a ***** to debug - high drain despite good deep sleep percentages is really difficult to solve. (Basically, something is failing to power down in deep sleep.)
Maybe more info this weekend when I have time to get a kernel tree synced and building for the 10.1.
I think there were two reasons no other kernel developers have done much with the 10.1:
1) Until Heimdall supports the 10.1, developing kernels for it is a bit of a pain in the ass.
2) Pershoot does a damn good job - if it ain't broke, don't fix it. There's only two features I miss that aren't present in the kernel, and they weren't worth the hassle of maintaining my own fork.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i get good with battery life on CM9 (for tab 10.1). especially so with the new wifi module coming.
this is with no sync on (using new module):
45 hours - 93%
with sync on, just a bit less then that.
another person with 3g + wifi always on (using new module), about 14 hours, lost 13%.
pershoot said:
i get good with battery life on CM9 (for tab 10.1). especially so with the new wifi module coming.
this is with no sync on (using new module):
45 hours - 93%
with sync on, just a bit less then that.
another person with 3g + wifi always on (using new module), about 14 hours, lost 13%.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
New module? Holy crap, I just revisted your sources. I guess ICS doesn't like the legacy BCM4330 module.
That explains a lot...
45 hours to 93% is consistent with what I got with HC. Right now, I'm intermittently (Sometimes life is great, but at some point it behaves like something is not properly powering down in deep sleep and remains that way until reboot - it can take 2-3 days to break in some cases, in others it breaks almost immediately.) getting around 1%/hour standby which is poor for a 7 AH battery on a wifi-only device (esp because I KNOW it used to do much better). I suspected it was wifi power management, but it's apparently not the specific issue I thought it was (even though it has very similar symptoms)... (As I said - I've been so busy I haven't had time to mess with it myself, I was going to this weekend but now it looks like I'll be changing track.)
I just rebuilt, time to flash!
BTW, which remote do you pull Dmitry Schmidt's patches from? Last time I tried to find upstream for that stuff I failed.
pershoot said:
i get good with battery life on CM9 (for tab 10.1). especially so with the new wifi module coming.
this is with no sync on (using new module):
45 hours - 93%
with sync on, just a bit less then that.
another person with 3g + wifi always on (using new module), about 14 hours, lost 13%.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sir, flat out ROCK!
So far, after repo syncing, rebuilding, and flashing last night - the new wifi driver seems to be doing the trick. I'm now seeing battery life consistent with what I used to see on HC. Went to bed at 95% and it's down to 94% now. Previously, I would've lost at least 10% in that period of time.
Of course, it needs a few days to shake out - previously it took as much as 2-3 days before it flaked out, although even pre-flakeout I don't think I ever saw CM9 on the Tab do this well in terms of standby battery.
I spoke too soon, and it turns out I was wrong with my initial guesses as to the nature of the problem. I haven't been as rigorous with the Tab as with my main devices.
It turns out it is exhibiting the same Broadcom bug with frequent wakeups that I777 UCKK6, I9100 XWKK5, and a few Infuse leaks had - See http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1308030 , it's the first entry in the list there.
It's annoying because it's a combo of system and kernel - on I9100 and I777 it was usually caused by system changes, but sometimes would surface if a kernel developer started mucking around in the BCM4330 driver...
In the attached zip is:
A dmesg dump
A shot of the battery screen (less useful than I thought it was now that the problem is not what I originally thought it was)
A dump of /proc/wakelocks
A Wireshark pcap of the problem - note the protocol 0x886c packets happening at 1 Hz
i have samsung vibrant t959 and the battery life is so weak . went the battery have 100 % it s rest 5 min and it says that still just 30 % . and another 5 min say it s under 14 % . the wifi and gps are off the . and i have the ROM ICS 4.0.3 . and another problem went i reboot the phone it takes 5 min to start . ( I hope U understand my special english thanks a lot )
sammo1 said:
i have samsung vibrant t959 and the battery life is so week . went the battery have 100 % it s rest 5 min and it says that still just 30 % . and another 5 min say it s under 14 % . the wifi and gps are off the . and i have the ROM ICS 4.0.3 . and another problem went i reboot the phone it takes 5 min to start . ( I hope U understand my special english thanks alot )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That sounds very odd. Is the phone actually dying that quickly, or is it reporting your charge incorrectly?
Either way, to help us figure out what is going on...
What Rom are you on exactly?
What kernel?
OC?
UV?
Governor?
High and low frequencies?
My immediate thoughts however are that your battery may have gone bad though.
I have ics passion 4.0.3. My phone draink the charge very kuicly. Il think the battery is dead
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
sammo1 said:
I have ics passion 4.0.3. My phone draink the charge very kuicly. Il think the battery is dead
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with the statement about your battery being dead, (Maybe) but you should try a different ROM as well, especially since I recall having battery drain issues as well with ICS Passion. Not to mention that its outdated and ICS still has the EU bug which no one knows how to fix 100%. (EU bug is dangerous, just search it up.) GPS also doesn't function that well. If I were you, I would try one of the CM10 ROMS for now or any of the JB ROMS, at least until Android 4.2 is officially released by CM. I am on CM10.1 Hellybean by Derteufel; amazing work as usual and GPS locks in under 10 secs. Battery life is really good too. This is the first time my GPS on this phone worked without applying any fixes. (Well, actually, all CM10.1 ROMs that I've tried have a fully working GPS) Really, I think you should try these new ROMS. They are really nice. Sorry, I got a bit off topic and started rambling, but yeah, try one of these ROMs. If you still have major drain issues, then its time to change your battery. I'm already guessing its a battery problem though.
EDIT: OOPS MY BAD. I didnt read everything completely. Yeah, its most likely either a bad battery or its reporting the stats wrong.
Yeah sammo, its time to change ROMs. My recommendation is ParanoidAndroid 2.54-360, with the latest semaphore kernel. Check these battery stats
what ROM U think i should have in my t959 . i dont need gps i just want the battery go longer . and please if U don t mind . put the link of a thread of the rom .THANK U guys u re awsome .
The screenshot is on the better side but 18hrs is about average for me.
PA thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=32013558
Use the 360 version.
I am Jack's smirking revenge.
agreed, some Roms run differently on different phones, gunny be careful with those scream, I mean screenshots..
Maybe your battery is close to the end of it's life cycle.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Don't guess, just flash another ROM and you'll be sure.
Try out Kingsoft's Miui with Semaphore 2.50, a beautiful experience (use the tricks in the thread for best results).
Thank u guys. Il really helped me. im gonna try the 4.1.2 parandroid
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
Personally, I get better battery on slim bean than on paranoid android or MIUI. Combined with the semaphore kernel, I get 20 hours usually.
If it's a battery issue, I'd still get a replacement, the ROM/kernel you use only affects battery life marginally.
I'd switch to one of the recommended roms and download the battery calibration app from the Play Store..
If its a battery on the fritz then it'll still need to be replaced. It may help with incorrect stats reporting though. Good luck!
I'm looking for the best ROM for battery life, I prefer android Oreo please. Any ideas? Thanks!
Friendlyx355 said:
I'm looking for the best ROM for battery life, I prefer android Oreo please. Any ideas? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aicp 13.1 , Maybe you can try stay on stock setting for few days I heard people say it's pretty good.
Another option is if you want more battery use Kernel adiutor to lower cpu max speed down for big and little core. For Aicp 13.1 there is guide from the dev (Mosimchah) on the first page of his kernel tread how to tweak for battery or performance.
LineAge 15.1 also coming together but less customization with stock kernel but it's good too for battery/performance. If you are not on your phone all day should have enough battery.
The best battery life will be with AOKP 6.1 their no ROM better!
The higher you in android the worse your battery life will be I have tried every one.
Sent from my LEX727 using xda premium
The original stock is still the best, but you are asking about ROMS.
AICP 13.1 (Oreo 8.1) is by far the best battery life for all the ROMS out of the box that still gives you proper notifications. In the past I have had to install greenify and other power saving tools. I do not have to do that with AICP.
On average I am getting 0.7%/hour drain when screen is off. Screen on time average is around 7 hours.
The ROM is still in testing stages, but it is pretty close to release.
slgooding said:
The original stock is still the best, but you are asking about ROMS.
AICP 13.1 (Oreo 8.1) is by far the best battery life for all the ROMS out of the box that still gives you proper notifications. In the past I have had to install greenify and other power saving tools. I do not have to do that with AICP.
On average I am getting 0.7%/hour drain when screen is off. Screen on time average is around 7 hours.
The ROM is still in testing stages, but it is pretty close to release.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to get in fight over this but I have test all and AOKP has battery life I have test all .
Orea still had battery drain I have tried them all.
These are from AOPK 6.1 if you have better stats post.them
The battery on AOKP is even better than stock.
Sent from my LEX720 using xda premium
mchlbenner said:
Not to get in fight over this but I have test all and AOKP has battery life I have test all .
Orea still had battery drain I have tried them all.
These are from AOPK 6.1 if you have better stats post.them
The battery on AOKP is even better than stock.
Sent from my LEX720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi! Can you give the aokp link you are using?
Pa77er said:
Hi! Can you give the aokp link you are using?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=70904507
Sent from my LEX720 using xda premium
Why is there still no perfect rom.
I tried all of them, none of them fit me ...
I do not want to disrespect the developers.
Aicp and omni are too slow for me. I feel like I'm using a medium and an entry-level phone when I use the device.
The paranoid rom is too fast.
But I have problems. Fingerprints do not work when I'm asleep. I have to try it all the time.
Lineageos aicp and omni talk too bad. (At the time of the call)
mchlbenner said:
Not to get in fight over this but I have test all and AOKP has battery life I have test all .
Orea still had battery drain I have tried them all.
These are from AOPK 6.1 if you have better stats post.them
The battery on AOKP is even better than stock.
Sent from my LEX720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have seen results similar to yours depending on my usage. However, averages are much more realistic than just one time results. I have attached an image of mine over 26 sessions.
Results can different with different users but I have used every ROM plus I have experience in kernel hacking .
I should said I'm not running stock kernel it came with.
Why don't post over night sleep usage mine will go down 1% to 0% 8 hours.
You can't get that in 8.1.
My performance is the same to 8.1.
I miss flew thing that 8.1 has but I'm good performance and battery newer is not always better.
Sent from my LEX720 using xda premium
mchlbenner said:
Results can different with different users but I have used every ROM plus I have experience in kernel hacking .
I should said I'm not running stock kernel it came with.
Why don't post over night sleep usage mine will go down 1% to 0% 8 hours.
You can't get that in 8.1.
My performance is the same to 8.1.
I miss flew thing that 8.1 has but I'm good performance and battery newer is not always better.
Sent from my LEX720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most roms are similar for functions, for Android 8.1 people like new stuff and the crazy hyped about it. For me personally I just want to try Oreo, want to know what it is like to use it. Aicp 13.1 and LigeAge 15.1 work very well, battery is plenty if you are not on your phone all day.
For battery, it means to be use/discharge that's why phone have it, how long it last just depends how you use the phone. You can't really get two days battery life with Sd820/821, you can get it with Sd625 like Redmi Note4 with 4000mAh battery. Most people carry more than one phone with them nowadays I think so no problem.
Aicp 13.1 is my preferred ROM. Graph starts at 60%. Only mobile data used, and cpu is set to 1.4 for little and 1.9 for big.
@Ace42
Performance at Aicp is much worse with hele CPU underclock.
mchlbenner said:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=70904507
Sent from my LEX720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you mean 6.0 rom or 7.1 rom ?
CuDem said:
you mean 6.0 rom or 7.1 rom ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
6.01 rom.
Aopk.
Sent from my SM-A730F using xda premium
I've just installed 6.01 rom Aopk on my x720 but doesen't go in 4G
I returned to my girom rom 26s-stock-based just after 1 hour
https://forum.gizchina.it/index.php?/topic/1307-gizrom-14-26s-per-leeco-le-pro-3-x720/
(i think that stock stock stock 20s in maybe better than 23s , 26s rom based ...)
I may be understood why ''6.01 rom Aopk marshmallow battery'' is good ... ,
with kernel adiutor,
I noticed that maximum high frequency was about 1800Mhz of big core ecc ecc with balance profile.
thanks by k54 (from italy)
I use miui9, and I get about 6 to 7 he screen on time easily. I had few screen shot, but ended up wiping the entire storage because of recovery issue.
Best ROM by far
Hey guys. I have been using this ROM for a month now and believe its the latest and most stable based off Leeco stock rom. I get around 5-6 hours SOT on medium to heavy use. That's with both sims on with 4G+ on all day. I have apps running all day like facebook, messenger, instagram, snapchat, skype, whatsapp, google+, outlook, gmail, aliexpress, expressvpn, spotify, teatv, youtube. Also play around 30mins of plants vs zombies and unkilled everyday.
All the features on this Cuoco92 VR4 ROM works flawlessly. Its based off the latest 28s chinese stock rom but all chinese bloatware and text has been removed. Also google playstore is preinstalled and it works without an issue.
Changelog:
- Based on official 28S
- Gapps minimal (02/2018)
- Cuoco Settings with new features
- User-Interface with toggles (check cuoco/Advanced settings)
- Dialer with large caller picture, call recording enabled for all regions, Yellopages removed (check cuoco/Advanced settings)
- Screen colors adjustments to be comfortable under the sunlight
- Updated Magisk to version 5.6.0
- New weather widget
- V4Android preinstalled
- Xposed installer
- DolbyAtmos
- Performance and battery optimizations
- New TWRP RECOVERY 3.2.1
- Removed ads from LeEco apps
- Other fixes
oint_right:__LeEco services are disabed from default. You can Enable it again from my settings.
: If you have any kind of issues, please backup your applications with TitaniumBackup and reset your device (factory reset) from TWRP.__
Factory reset required!
Install instructions
- You need to install rom via TWRP recovery. I am using version 3.0.2.0
https://forum.xda-developers.com/le-pro3/how-to/leeco-le-pro-3-root-t3476560
- make a full backup of existing rom and modem via TWRP before flashing new rom
- i installed my new rom through a usb drive using a OTG connector. Works best for me
http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=783366&st=2780#entry69580146
- i am also using this modem configuration as i do not get dropouts and has good signal coverage
http://4pda.ru/forum/index.php?showtopic=783366&st=2780#entry69580146
Hope this helps. Please give me some feedback. Enjoy!