I'm trying to guage how well my TF is running having been Prime 1.9'd and clocked to 1.6GHz. I'd like to see other users scores, potentially anyone breaking 4K would be amazing.
I'd also be interested to see if Clemsyn's Kernels offer any more poke per clock than the Prime ones.
Anyway - here's mine :
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
wildestpixel said:
I'm trying to guage how well my TF is running having been Prime 1.9'd and clocked to 1.6GHz. I'd like to see other users scores, potentially anyone breaking 4K would be amazing.
I'd also be interested to see if Clemsyn's Kernels offer any more poke per clock than the Prime ones.
Anyway - here's mine :
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please use antutu for benchmarking..
Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk
In which case Antutu score is just 6,836
wildestpixel said:
In which case Antutu score is just 6,836
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks.. i got around 6300 @ 1472MHz
wildestpixel said:
I'm trying to guage how well my TF is running having been Prime 1.9'd and clocked to 1.6GHz. I'd like to see other users scores, potentially anyone breaking 4K would be amazing.
I'd also be interested to see if Clemsyn's Kernels offer any more poke per clock than the Prime ones.
Anyway - here's mine :
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SEARCH lots of threads with same name
Rumbleweed said:
SEARCH lots of threads with same name
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But not focussed on tf101 hence me starting the thread.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Transformer TF101 with Prime 1.9 @ 1.6
Finally!!!!!!!! Someone started a thread to compare benchmark scores.
Wait.....searching for similar threads.....
Nevermind there seems to be several threads just like this because it seems to be everyones favorite past time to compare scores that mean nothing in real world use.
To answer the OPs question......Since we only have kernel source and thats the only thing that can really be tweaked then it will depend on the kernel and not the rom. I have had my transformer since the first week they came out and have never run a benchmark score. I run whatever kernel is the most stable for my device (not all devices can run every kernel at every speed btw) and overclock to 1.4ish because it seems to have little effect on battery life but really makes the UI snappy
---------- Post added at 12:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:10 PM ----------
wildestpixel said:
But not focussed on tf101 hence me starting the thread.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Transformer TF101 with Prime 1.9 @ 1.6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously? You have got to be seriously kidding. There is at least 1 new thread a week discussing some kind of benchmark scores along with it being discussed in almost every rom thread. Searching "Quadrant" in asus forum only returned 5 threads that had it in there title. This doesnt include all the other ways people start benchmark threads or the numerous other benchmarks available.
This is useless as there are PLENTY of other questions of the same ilk which are already discussed and answered.
Related
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've been reading people say theyrebgetting low scores for the ota froyo so I decided to try it myself and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
Ya, I'm getting 2k + also. Linpack is also running very fast with best of 342ms. I'm impressed. It's not only scoring great in benchmarks, but also as you mentioned very responsive.
Which versions did you guys flash, and which theme?
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
bobdude5 said:
and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, the Christmas (or another) theme based on Quantum 1.5 ROM? That ROM had a specific configuration to explicitly display the futility of quadrant scores.
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.....
Sent from my spot on the earth.
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Electrofreak said:
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what other benchmark is non-biased?
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here.
NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yerp. 1050 here on stock update.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App
WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me i could have sworn I was in the general section when I posted this! I think there's something funky going on witht the xda app
Sorry about that
ghostrid3r said:
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The the stock rooted deodexed one..and the theme is nova night..but I doubt that has anything to do with the score
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
lanielf said:
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHY????? This is for devs not synthetic scores.....................
... so what?
wow....
a thread
lanielf said:
I have the Bell Samsung Galaxy S I9000-M with Darky's mod 8.0 + KERNEL] SpeedMod Froyo [K12P BRIGHT-FIX3
My quadrant score is 1934
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Wrong section (At best it should go under General)
2. Read this Link
My quadrant is just over 9000
EarlZ said:
My quadrant is just over 9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have to take it out of the liquid nitrogen to make a call or is you nails?
let the flaming begin.
everyone's using the same device. this is like an overclocking thread instead =.=
I have 10000...Am i fast now?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
1925
Advanced voodoo v666.2
1.28ghz OC
JS3 2.2.1 rom
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
do these scores get you wet or something?
Whats the big deal?
Someone started the thread, if you ain't gonna answer it probably, why bother posting at all?
I see no problem in seeing which setup gives a higher score, regardless of whether quadrant guides an accurate comparison or not.
I posted mine, plus my setup for all too see.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
chrisjcks said:
Whats the big deal?
Someone started the thread, if you ain't gonna answer it probably, why bother posting at all?
I see no problem in seeing which setup gives a higher score, regardless of whether quadrant guides an accurate comparison or not.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is no big deal. That's why some people are making fun of it...
Because Quadrant does not provide an accurate guideline score for speed of the phone, this thread is a joke, so what's the problem if we're making fun of it?
Peace dude.
The Op was curious and interested in other peoples scores and set up whether its accurate or not.
If youve nothing to contribute then dont post....simple.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
KennyLegend said:
The Op was curious and interested in other peoples scores
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung Galaxy S I9000 forum > search this forum > type in 'quadrant score' > show posts > enter > miracle
Eclair no lagfix 970
Eclair Ryans lagfix 2220
Froyo no lag fix 1140
Froyo Voodoo lag fix 1540 .
And thats why Quadrant is a bad benchmark laggy Eclair high score non laggy Froyo low score .
jje
The Nexus S get about 1750 so isn't it the score that we should get on a lagfixed Galaxy S?
stock js3 1301
no tweaks at all
Like the topic says.
Post here your benchmark score's, olso tell us what rom and kernel you use .
I prefer quadrant to use
I did a amazing record for my feeling yesterday , with latest Miui rom 1.10.28 + Siyah kerrnel RC3 and made a score of 6040
http://miuiandroid.com/ for the rom
http://www.gokhanmoral.com/gm/ for the kernel
Oc to 1.6 + 1600mV
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Thx to all the developers !
Great, another measurebating thread...
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
antiochasylum said:
Great, another measurebating thread...
Sent from my Insanity powered SGS2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^.^ that made me laugh.
tbh, its not the worst thread idea but i wouldnt say quadrant is good for this on the sg2. id suggest using the following.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1134768
My Signature says all
My handset is only running 100 on Quadrant, 200 on Antutu and 300 on CF's benchmark, yet it's lovely to use, so as I'm not 12-years-old or a 50-year-old listening to Phil Collins in a Porsche convertible I'm cool with it.
omgg nice!!!!
Lets compare Avg FPS on angry birds next!!
Nice , goin try the fps when im home .
This thread has been posted multiple times before.. Quick example:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1265184
Oh, and I'm just assuming you posted this thread to show of your score, so please, stop being shy over it. We all got the same device..
Shy of what? Im happy with that score . Always wining complaining pll.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Batista70 Foxhound Edition 3.7.4 + Siyah Kernel 2.1 @ 1,6GHz
Hyperdroid 2.8.7 with siyah 2.1 DK at 1.6ghz
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
@ ephraim033 lol , Thats realy awsome
Thougt that 6k was the top
My benchmark scores are in my signature.
I have decided to abandon Quadrant since it's kinda bad to show how powerfull the Galaxy S II is.
Tom-Helge said:
My benchmark scores are in my signature.
I have decided to abandon Quadrant since it's kinda bad to show how powerfull the Galaxy S II is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont get it, whats wrong with that?
I love galaxy s2
Fibercoax said:
I dont get it, whats wrong with that?
I love galaxy s2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is easy to achieve a high Quadrant score by using kernels/ROMs which are optimised specifically for Quadrant but does not give an increase in other benchmarks or real world usage.
On the previous page, adrianmignogna got an amazing 6380 on Quadrant and 13111, 2853, 6956 on CF-Bench. So his SGS2 must be a super whopper phone which blasts my SGS2 away since I only get 4226 on Quadrant.
However, my exact same phone when tested on CF-Bench gives 12920, 3719, 7399 which actually puts it quite close in performance against his phone (actually beats his score of 6956 vs my 7399). Note that I am using only a fully stock XWKJ1 ROM with root.
Quadrant score
I used quadrant score mostly here's my score ...........
Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.
the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....
foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?
rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?
Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!
Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??
i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D
Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri
RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri
MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000
It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri
Hi guys. Can you post your antutu benchmarks here from 1st run 2nd and third consequently. I get 170k, 120k, and 110k in performance mode. Do you guys have these scores?
Hello i have 177 / 160 / 158
Envoyé de mon SM-G955F en utilisant Tapatalk
I swear I've seen at least 5 different variations of this post by you all over this forum by now. No one cares mate. If you keep running the test of course you're going to get diminishing returns as your phone heats up and resources get hogged up. Should the subsequent tests be as low as they are? I don't know, but who cares?!
There's a reason nobody is responding to this comment even though you've been posting it everywhere. Its just such a non-issue that no one cares, the simple truth. Nobody else on this site sits there running antutu benchmarks on their phone back-to-back 4 times, once a day. Now I realize I'm being rather blunt but my lord, who does that? Either live with the phone as it is or go get something else that you can live with mate.
Are you looking for a phone to enjoy benchmarks or can you just enjoy the real world performance like the rest of us down here on Earth?
EDIT: 8 times! I just looked. EIGHT times you've posted the same thing. Unbelieveable.
Hey newb, if you don't like his post just walk on by.
kennyggg said:
Hi guys. Can you post your antutu benchmarks here from 1st run 2nd and third consequently. I get 170k, 120k, and 110k in performance mode. Do you guys have these scores?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, all 3 runs scores around 174000 on my s8+ . Optimized mode.
ggrant3876 said:
Hey newb, if you don't like his post just walk on by.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, he does have a point, if the OP has duplicate topics about the same subject, then there is a problem.
By all means though, the score doesn't really matter too much, anyways. It's about how you use the device daily and that it does everything with ease that should matter the most.
Besides, wasn't it proven a couple years ago that companies buy a higher score for their devices, anyways?
This is before to disable some apps... Later I got 175k
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Enviado desde mi SM-G955F mediante Tapatalk
Zulfigar said:
Well, he does have a point, if the OP has duplicate topics about the same subject, then there is a problem.
By all means though, the score doesn't really matter too much, anyways. It's about how you use the device daily and that it does everything with ease that should matter the most.
Besides, wasn't it proven a couple years ago that companies buy a higher score for their devices, anyways?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's probably a Mods decision, not his or yours.
Not sure why you're so intent on posting so many Antutu benchmark posts, but in this forum, we have another thread that was started last montht that may be of help
https://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-s8+/how-to/antutu-benchmark-t3593317
P.S. Benchmarks are of little value nowadays. Most people don't care about them.