Anyone see this article? Think we would get some options for fascinate with this? Also rumor has it that when this is released they are going to release the kernel source code for gingerbread which would make the custom roms that much better. Can't wait to see what we got. I'd post this in development section but I don't have rights there yet.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
I don't understand the point of this thread. All Eric Shdmidt said was that ICS would be released October/November. Not sure where your getting your rumours from, and we don't know if ICS will be avaliable officially or unofficially for other phones.
Wasn't looking for an asshole reply but thanks anyway
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
mkuehl06 said:
I'd post this in development section but I don't have rights there yet.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Phew!! you should consider yourself lucky you didn't post this in dev.... The source for gingerbread mesmerize kernel has been out for a week. And some changes/fixes have already been implemented in some stuff. Mainly mtd roms.
good day.
Well I did say fascinate which I know the kernel hasn't been released yet cause there is not an official Verizon gb rom.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
mkuehl06 said:
Well I did say fascinate which I know the kernel hasn't been released yet cause there is not an official Verizon gb rom.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It seems you haven't been around long. But on the VZW fascinate the kernel is identical to the uscc mesmerize. So when the mesmerize got froyo and kernel source was released we had fun custom kernels on the facinate based off of ec10. And when the vzw fascinate kernel source was finally released. No one made a kernel off of it because it was the same code. Now we find history is repeating itself. Mesmerize get upgrade (gingerbread), source released, and devs for fascinate use source to fix things and make kernels for the vzw facinate.
good day.
Deleted
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
No haven't been around fascinate very long. Had an Eris before this. Hated it so I bought this one. But I like your responses your not trying to be a **** just informative.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Also keep in mind that the Dev section is not for rumors. It's only for posting roms, kernels, mods, etc. So when you do have permission to post there, please don't post this kind of stuff.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
Will do
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Not known which phones? It's pretty widely known that the Nexus Prime series will be the first phones to run ICS, namely the Droid Prime by Samsung.
kuronosan said:
Not known which phones? It's pretty widely known that the Nexus Prime series will be the first phones to run ICS, namely the Droid Prime by Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not gonna be called the Droid Prime. This has already been established by many many sources.
Sent from my Incredible 2 using XDA App
kuronosan said:
Not known which phones? It's pretty widely known that the Nexus Prime series will be the first phones to run ICS, namely the Droid Prime by Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe there are seven devices that will have ICS (some of them are obviously not out yet):
- Nexus Prime
- Nexus S
- Nexus One
- Droid RAZR
- Droid Bionic
- Transformer
- Transformer Prime
chasemyaccord said:
I believe there are seven devices that will have ICS (some of them are obviously not out yet):
- Nexus Prime
- Nexus S
- Nexus One
- Droid RAZR
- Droid Bionic
- Transformer
- Transformer Prime
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I believe the xoom is also on that list.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
tripacer99 said:
I believe the xoom is also on that list.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh really?
*dusts off the Xoom*
Time to play
Related
Wrong section, sorry just hoping devs will have more chance of seeing, maybe vibrant's will be too
Rogers' Samsung Captivate Froyo upgrade source code released
ANDROID CENTRAL | FEBRUARY 03, 2011
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/andr...-captivate-froyo-upgrade-source-code-released
Samsung has released the Android 2.2 source code for the Rogers Samsung Captivate. Anyone who may be interested in making some ... read more
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
csdalporto said:
Wrong section, sorry just hoping devs will have more chance of seeing, maybe vibrant's will be too
Rogers' Samsung Captivate Froyo upgrade source code released
ANDROID CENTRAL | FEBRUARY 03, 2011
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/andr...-captivate-froyo-upgrade-source-code-released
Samsung has released the Android 2.2 source code for the Rogers Samsung Captivate. Anyone who may be interested in making some ... read more
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Roger's is a Canadian Cell Company. Besides, that Samsung Captivate is the SGH-I896 not the "US" version which is, SGH-I897...
But, who am i to judge??
csdalporto said:
Wrong section, sorry just hoping devs will have more chance of seeing, maybe vibrant's will be too
Rogers' Samsung Captivate Froyo upgrade source code released
ANDROID CENTRAL | FEBRUARY 03, 2011
http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/andr...-captivate-froyo-upgrade-source-code-released
Samsung has released the Android 2.2 source code for the Rogers Samsung Captivate. Anyone who may be interested in making some ... read more
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to be an ass but we already had thread like this in general. It doesn't have anything to do with vibrant as they received their froyo while back. And we received our froyo like a week ago..
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
eunkipark92 said:
Not to be an ass but we already had thread like this in general. It doesn't have anything to do with vibrant as they received their froyo while back. And we received our froyo like a week ago..
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well receiving the official rom and the source are two different things. You can do much more with the source like making kernels that are much more stable and fast and build better roms.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
hitman818 said:
Well receiving the official rom and the source are two different things. You can do much more with the source like making kernels are much more stable and fast and build better roms.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm saying Samsung is not going to release the source right away after they just released the Rom. I will be surprised if they did.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Rogers got the ROM around January 6...source about a month after...they will probably follow suit with the vibrant also. A few more weeks minimum...
Sdobron said:
Rogers got the ROM around January 6...source about a month after...they will probably follow suit with the vibrant also. A few more weeks minimum...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup and I think international galaxy s got theirs after 35 days so we still have 2 -3weeks
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Hmmm ya if samsung follows their standard pattern of crappiness, they'll onto it the most, just source code would help development of overclocking and FFC....
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
@ the OP. You know devs do read other sections too....
csdalporto said:
Hmmm ya if samsung follows their standard pattern of crappiness, they'll onto it the most, just source code would help development of overclocking and FFC....
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And porting international galaxy s Rom. Cyanogenmod 7 etc..
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
source
++ never mind i tough i saw the source for vibrant in samsung site but realize was not the froyo one ++
Guess what everyone. If you look on Twitter, you'll see that Eugene got his hands on T959 Vibrant SOURCE. Yes, for OUR phones... no "D" on the end. I would say we can expect good things to come very soon.
http://twitter.com/#!/Eugene_373
Whitehawkx said:
Guess what everyone. If you look on Twitter, you'll see that Eugene got his hands on T959 Vibrant SOURCE. Yes, for OUR phones... no "D" on the end. I would say we can expect good things to come very soon.
http://twitter.com/#!/Eugene_373
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just peeped that.....I can't wait
I see he just released an update for his kernel that's built from source. He won't say how he got source though, and no one else has it.
I'm about to try out the kernel though, so we'll see how big this really is.
uurrnn said:
I see he just released an update for his kernel that's built from source. He won't say how he got source though, and no one else has it.
I'm about to try out the kernel though, so we'll see how big this really is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep Me too. bout to flash this baby!
Deleted post. Someone beat me to it.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Moved of: Samsung Vibrant > Vibrant Android Development
To: Samsung Vibrant > Vibrant General
I'm a pretty experienced dev, but someone help me out here... What is "source"?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
sreno said:
I'm a pretty experienced dev, but someone help me out here... What is "source"?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:O
The source code for the kernel and the platform. Or are you asking something else?
sreno said:
I'm a pretty experienced dev, but someone help me out here... What is "source"?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
U sure ur a dev? Cause that was ur first post on xda fourm.
U haven't developed anything yet.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Anybody have any idea if ics will be compatible with the atrix?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
2 threads down from this one is a thread already about this.
Sent from my Atrix
That thread is about the face recognition software, it doesn't answer my question.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Ramsport said:
That thread is about the face recognition software, it doesn't answer my question.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bunch of discussion about whether or not it will work on the Atrix (ics). But whatev.
Sent from my Atrix
Listen to Macgruber... He Rips Throats...!!
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G
Ramsport said:
That thread is about the face recognition software, it doesn't answer my question.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's put it this way, the Nexus S will be getting ICS, and the Atrix basically has twice the specs. So the Atrix on paper can support ICS.
The bigger question is how the carriers are going to allow this?
Bottom line, whether it's OTA or CM7 we will see ICS in some fashion on the Atrix...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
ccrows said:
Let's put it this way, the Nexus S will be getting ICS, and the Atrix basically has twice the specs. So the Atrix on paper can support ICS.
The bigger question is how the carriers are going to allow this?
Bottom line, whether it's OTA or CM7 we will see ICS in some fashion on the Atrix...
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, I know that the Atrix will get this in some sort of fashion, the only thing that I "worry" about is the finger-print scanner. I wonder if this will delay the Atrix from getting it sooner, since it is a completely unique device. I just hope the FPS doesn't get left out.
Engadget said most ginger bread devices should get the ota
Ramsport said:
Anybody have any idea if ics will be compatible with the atrix?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you did your research properly instead of posting another one of those threads that's people go through again and again, you would definitely know the answer by now.
Have a good day or night.
twayneo said:
Engadget said most ginger bread devices should get the ota
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source?
I know google had mentioned that devices currently running gingerbread would be able to run ICS (hardware-wise). Its still up to the manufacturers to create those OTA updates...
Of course will be totally compatible with Atrix! Nexus doesnt have a hardware so different to Atrix! This is the difference between Apple and Google. When Apple says about iOS, they put a date and always launch a public final one week later. Now, Android its a blah blah, all depends of third person, its a shame an OS that grows up like this and have like half of customers in world, they treat us like this. shame!
quicklyspent said:
Source?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He posted the source. Engadget!
Assimilated via WinBorg 4G
CaelanT said:
He posted the source. Engadget!
Assimilated via WinBorg 4G
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In that case, I read on Engadget that the Atrix will be the first phone to get ICS. Even before the Nexus. Should be pushed sometime tonight.
quicklyspent said:
In that case, I read on Engadget that the Atrix will be the first phone to get ICS. Even before the Nexus. Should be pushed sometime tonight.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha. Im running it now.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I read somewhere (no source: read at your own risk) that ics is made for omap processors and Tegra devices (ie. Atrix) will take a while longer to develop... At least through official channels - here's hoping to official CM support!
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
jivester024 said:
I read somewhere (no source: read at your own risk) that ics is made for omap processors and Tegra devices (ie. Atrix) will take a while longer to develop... At least through official channels - here's hoping to official CM support!
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That would semi sorta explain why Atrix 2 went and put a TI-OMAP Processor in their phone. Interesting.
jivester024 said:
I read somewhere (no source: read at your own risk) that ics is made for omap processors and Tegra devices (ie. Atrix) will take a while longer to develop... At least through official channels - here's hoping to official CM support!
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong. Just like how honeycomb's designated SoC was Tegra 2, the designated SoC for ICS is the OMAP 4. IE Google determined that they were the best SoC available at the time and built their flagship device using that particular processor. It has nothing to do with porting android to various SoCs.
the olympus o2x aint gettings ICS it seems
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1308493
andrew.cambridge said:
2 threads down from this one is a thread already about this.
Sent from my Atrix
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are so right. Thread closed.
Does anyone know if a stable CM9 for Fascinate will be released far behind the release for other phones? Similar to CM7? Or will stable builds be released at the same time for all CM supported devices?
Personally I think the version we have now is pretty stable. As they add their tweaks and settings well get them. Either through jt or a Kang from someone.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
It shouldn't. The reason CM7 took awhile was because a Fascinate version was created from the bottom up. Now that they have a base, CM9 should be out as quickly as any other phone.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
probably faster than incredible 2. we don't even have working camera yet nor video playback
Sent from my Incredible 2
xHoLyx said:
probably faster than incredible 2. we don't even have working camera yet nor video playback
Sent from my Incredible 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's bc you don't have jt!!!!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
dave3588 said:
That's bc you don't have jt!!!!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well apparently we don't have JT anymore either.....he won a contest on RootzWiki and got a Galaxy Nexus....so if what I've heard is correct....we probably won't be seeing fascinate development from him anymore (hopefully I'm wrong)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using xda premium
This was covered back when he actually won the nexus. IIRC, he's not stopping development for the fascinate.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
k_nivesout said:
This was covered back when he actually won the nexus. IIRC, he's not stopping development for the fascinate.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
... and neither is Team Hacksung
"the relentless pursuit of the perfect ROM "
I came across this while Googling earlier. Seems Samsung made their RC's available somehow. Though it won't help us, it makes me wonder if there is a possibility.
http://code.google.com/p/ice-cream-sandwich-sgs/downloads/list
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Seems our siblings are getting ICS, why does the epic always get left in the dust? Because of Sprint?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
XtaC318 said:
Seems our siblings are getting ICS, why does the epic always get left in the dust? Because of Sprint?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung = lazy
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
marcusant said:
Samsung = lazy
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think samsung said all original galaxy s models don't have enough memory because.of.touchwiz and we know sammy won't takey out tw
Sent from my SPH-D700 using xda premium
I see Vibrant and Captivate...
sneezy316 said:
I see Vibrant and Captivate...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whats messed up is vibrant & Captivate has same specs??? SO WTF SAMMY
maybe cuz these phones are gsm ones. and closer to the international one.
These are not official Samsung builds, these are builds by Team ICSSGS. They are basically pure vanilla builds with no additional software or modifications, except for a few to get them to work on the listed devices. Thus no Touchwiz.. IIRC, Team ICSSGS began this project in November and have had these 3 phones with ICS since January.
nvm already been stated.
If your on XDA then you know we have ICS, so who cares? Even better it's cm9. Even better Marcusant keeps kanging other ICS based builds through it.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Not enough ram? Is this just asking me to try and port stock touchwiz ics from the touch?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
marcusant said:
Not enough ram? Is this just asking me to try and port stock touchwiz ics from the touch?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go for it
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA Premium App
Am I the only one who notices this is team icssgs not samsung?
Edit: I see adelmundo did
Sent from my CM9 Epic 4G
marcusant said:
Not enough ram? Is this just asking me to try and port stock touchwiz ics from the touch?
Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in what ways would this help or benefit us just curious is all? is it less aggresive TW so that we have more RAM? but seeing how we already have AOSP isn't that much smaller than TW already?
Honestly, I don't think the ram in the epic is enough for CM9, it just barely gets by IMO, so tw? Sorry but no, too bloated. Even the processor has a hard time keeping up with cm9, all that TW bloat would cripple it.
And yes, I still have my epic, and I carry it around everywhere. Just permanently in airplane mode lol.
Sent from my SPH-D710 using xda premium
adelmundo said:
These are not official Samsung builds, these are builds by Team ICSSGS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this /thread
I see ZTE are releasing the Grand X which is listed as being a tegra2 phone running ICS.
A good source of drivers/libs for the ATRIX?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Larac said:
I see ZTE are releasing the Grand X which is listed as being a tegra2 phone running ICS.
A good source of drivers/libs for the ATRIX?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We have to wait motorola for releasing proper drivers/libs
If it have the same chipset probably we can make an aosp.
Inviato dal mio Atrix con Tapatalk
gambe89 said:
We have to wait motorola for releasing proper drivers/libs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Indeed it's coming soon so it may be easier to use Moto's drivers than using ZTE's drivers that will not provide any support for the Lapdock. The new Webtop is just the tablet mode on a bigger screen so it should be portable to make an AOSP for the Atrix.
also sony is releasing a walkman(f800) with ics and tegra 2., but don't know if is the same
hmm yes here http://www.androidcentral.com/zte-announces-grand-x and here http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/2192722/zte-grand-x-handson-review it seems it runs the same soc as the atrix, but it uses adifferent modem (from nvidia actually), so it might be useful.
please make it really official for miui...hehehe
There's a lot of impatient people here I think. Were so close to getting official ICS.
Sent from my Desire HD
andrew.cambridge said:
There's a lot of impatient people here I think. Were so close to getting official ICS.
Sent from my Desire HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Useless comment... As is mine, but I really had to point it out... The point of these forums is development and discussion and not waiting around.
crnkoj said:
Useless comment... As is mine, but I really had to point it out... The point of these forums is development and discussion and not waiting around.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Called it useless but forum is for discussion...yeah that makes sense.
Patience is something everyone has to learn. Sometimes it takes more than others. You learn by waiting around.
Sent from my Desire HD
andrew.cambridge said:
There's a lot of impatient people here I think. Were so close to getting official ICS.
Sent from my Desire HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2 months ain't close dude
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using xda premium
soudy1994 said:
2 months ain't close dude
Sent from my Motorola Atrix 4G MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love phones and all..but come on.....2 months is too long? You gotta wait 18 months to upgrade your phone with At&T. You are litterally a different age by then.
Sent from my Desire HD
andrew.cambridge said:
I love phones and all..but come on.....2 months is too long? You gotta wait 18 months to upgrade your phone with At&T. You are litterally a different age by then.
Sent from my Desire HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I remember you saying I'm selling my atrix a year ago. You horror about everyone posting the quadrant scores and yet you come back and contradict Egbert smart ass post you have ever put in the atrix forum. It'sjust post of the forum life. Some people are happy with what they got and some aren't. Preaching your crap don't help.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Recon Freak said:
I remember you saying I'm selling my atrix a year ago. You horror about everyone posting the quadrant scores and yet you come back and contradict Egbert smart ass post you have ever put in the atrix forum. It'sjust post of the forum life. Some people are happy with what they got and some aren't. Preaching your crap don't help.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did sell my Atrix....your right. Because I had 2.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA
is it just me or the chip Grand X have is clocked at 1.2 Ghz. so this means we can over clock to 1.3 without any problem (i think) can any one help me understand this ****. i cant seams to get my head around over clocking my atrix and undervolting **** and one relate to another.
I take it that it won't be much use to get hold of a rom from one then?
Was going to try asking our voda rep to try one.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
A quick look at the build.prop from the room dump says it's a ventana chip. Same as ours, right?
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium