Related
So which has a better display for mobile gaming wise?
Sent from my Optimus 2X using xda premium
Inpsire, no contest. It's a little on the oversaturated side, but the Atrix uses the abysmal pentile sub-pixel layout so it's fuzzy and has a green bias.
Inspire has better colors.
Atrix has a higher resolution.
Choose based on your preference.
Jotokun said:
Inspire has better colors.
Atrix has a higher resolution.
Choose based on your preference.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not entirely true. The Atrix has 1,036,800 sub-pixels, the Inspire has 1,152,000. So although the Atrix is advertised as having a higher resolution it actually has fewer sub-pixels.
Atrix hands down.
I just know my friends infuse for games look 100x clearer so was just wondering for inspire as well.
Sent from my Optimus 2X using xda premium
Also be aware there is an issue with the Atrix touch panel, after ~10 seconds of contact that area of the touchscreen will stop responding and you will have to lift your finger and touch again. It doesn't matter for many applications, but games like Galaxy on Fire or emulators with virtual thumbsticks are a bit of a pain to play.
I think the biggest problem with the Atrix screen resolution is a good amount of games don't show properly due to the resolution difference. I have a handful of games that run with blackbars and don't form properly.
So games will look better on inspire though correct? ?
Sent from my Optimus 2X using xda premium
After owning both for 3 months each, I'm going to say inspire hands down. Don't pay any attention to the Atrix fanboys that troll these boards. They can get a little heated defending their "precious" device.
m0biusace said:
After owning both for 3 months each, I'm going to say inspire hands down. Don't pay any attention to the Atrix fanboys that troll these boards. They can get a little heated defending their "precious" device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. If you own the Atrix long enough you get used to the screen, but in a head to head comparison with Super AMOLED+ there is no competition. Another plus is that the touch panel and the display are the same piece of glass on the Inspire so there isn't the same air-gap you get with the Atrix.
I think some of you are confusing the HTC INSPIRE with the SAMSUNG INFUSE
2 different screens here!
REAVER117 said:
Agreed. If you own the Atrix long enough you get used to the screen, but in a head to head comparison with Super AMOLED+ there is no competition. Another plus is that the touch panel and the display are the same piece of glass on the Inspire so there isn't the same air-gap you get with the Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The inspire is not a superamoled + display it is a s-lcd.
atrix screen is nothing to gloat about.
i think we all bought this phone because of it being a beast inside. the screen is good enough where it doesnt take away from its awesomeness too much.
so yeah -- inspire wins screen comparison.
but id take dualcore, 1gb ram, qHD over s-lcd/saomled any day.
Yeah theres massive confusion on this thread, the Inspire looks like ass next to an Atrix. The Infuse looks like GOD next to nearly everything else. Yes I've owned all 3. The Inspire has a lower resolution on a larger screen, mine looks fuzzy to me after using my Atrix for just a few days. However my Inspire running CM7 or MIUI pretty much runs right with my Atrix running Alien with the 1.1Ghz OC. Only gaming issue I've had with the Atrix are that some games (Order and Chaos Online) aren't available on the market for it.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Your eyes adjust to the ATRIX display after a week or so, switching from an i4 sucked so bad at first.
I ended up trading my atrix for a red inspire brand new love it game support is so much better and graphics as well..
Sent from my Desire HD using xda premium
holding both phones side by side the inspire does have a better look to it.. my atrix seems to display yellow oddly.. not a big issue but its odd.. the atrix is much crisper but with the extra landscape the inspire has and its running ADRevolution 5.2.4 with sense 3.0 apps its not a contest the inspire is a phone i shouldn't have given to her .. my two cents
REAVER117 said:
Also be aware there is an issue with the Atrix touch panel, after ~10 seconds of contact that area of the touchscreen will stop responding and you will have to lift your finger and touch again. It doesn't matter for many applications, but games like Galaxy on Fire or emulators with virtual thumbsticks are a bit of a pain to play.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have the "touchscreen stops responding after 10 seconds" problem, what am I doing wrong?
REAVER117 said:
Agreed. If you own the Atrix long enough you get used to the screen, but in a head to head comparison with Super AMOLED+ there is no competition. Another plus is that the touch panel and the display are the same piece of glass on the Inspire so there isn't the same air-gap you get with the Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL! Since when does Inspire have a SAMOLED+ display?
Why do I keep seeing the same thing on here... the atrix is made for power and performance, not for having the best 4" screen you can look at. I mean honestly, its a 4" screen! Look how clear my screen is when I hold it inches from my face lol I plug my HDMI cable into a 55" Samsung 3d tv when I am worried about graphics and color rendering. We have devs working on landscape too. I prefer beast mode with lightning response time over my amazing 4" screen.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-vs-HTC-One-X_id3034
Here phonearena states that the display of slcd2 is best
Watch out guys.. .. ..
pikulu said:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-vs-HTC-One-X_id3034
Here phonearena states that the display of slcd2 is best
Watch out guys.. .. ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
link is already posted and probably should re-read the review
Phonearena said:
After our latest screen comparison, we concluded that the One X has the best phone display at this time, sporting very high levels of brightness, as well as saturated colors, with natural temperature. So, how does the PenTile-based HD Super AMOLED of the Galaxy S III compare to all that? Well, due to its AMOLED nature, the GS III's display is superior when it comes to color saturation and contrast. This screen can easily look spectacular and eye-catching – that's what it's best at. However, it is significantly colder than the One X. And thanks to its colors being saturated enough in order to guarantee an enjoyable picture, we'd consider the screen of the One X to be superior in terms of image quality.
As you know, both handsets sport HD resolution screens, so they both look incredibly crisp and clear. You might be wondering if the PenTile pixel arrangement of the Galaxy S III doesn't make it look a bit more pixelized. Well, there is a difference, but it is so small, that it can be easily neglected. In 99% of the time using the GS III, the effects of the PenTile matrix will not be noticed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It says the color saturation and contrast is better with the AMOLED and SLCD2 is sharper
pikulu said:
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Samsung-Galaxy-S-III-vs-HTC-One-X_id3034
Here phonearena states that the display of slcd2 is best
Watch out guys.. .. ..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trying to start another war huh? Nice try. User above me got to it first though.
Conclusion:
Well, folks, it should have become clear by now that the Galaxy S III will once again rule the land of Android, at least until a better contender arrives on the scene. For now, however, the powerful HTC One X isn't capable enough to question its leadership. Although HTC's offering is arguably better when it comes to appearance and overall design, the Galaxy S III is unbeatable as far as user experience goes and that's what's more important. Why would you need a good-looking phone that takes mediocre images and video, and as a number of nasty issues in its software? Meanwhile, the Galaxy S III may not be the most beautiful phone ever, but it does everything right in terms of functionality, meaning it will cause you far less trouble during day-to-day usage.
Once again, HTC's finest will have to play second-best to the Galaxy S phone of the year.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
____ LCD2 = sharper images + nice brightness
HD AMOLED = sharp images + nice contrast + nice colors
so choose yourself. And other fellow members, please dont start yet another "which is good?" war.
'''You might be wondering if the PenTile pixel arrangement of the Galaxy S III doesn't make it look a bit more pixelized. Well, there is a difference, but it is so small, that it can be easily neglected. In 99% of the time using the GS III, the effects of the PenTile matrix will not be noticed.'''
bala_gamer said:
____ LCD2 = sharper images + nice brightness
HD AMOLED = sharp images + nice contrast + nice colors
so choose yourself. And other fellow members, please dont start yet another "which is good?" war.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi bala, just for fun, I temp. switched back to my gs2 and now I see what I'm missing in my amoled screens.I currently own HTC one x and I've owned galaxu nexus in past. I hate to agree that I'll have to sell my one x once galaxy s3 will come out. I miss the amoled display.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
ceo.mtcl said:
Hi bala, just for fun, I temp. switched back to my gs2 and now I see what I'm missing in my amoled screens.I currently own HTC one x and I've owned galaxu nexus in past. I hate to agree that I'll have to sell my one x once galaxy s3 will come out. I miss the amoled display.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
heard similar feedback from many here
I don't see why this matters so much, I've seen the Note and One X in person and both have amazing screens, I cannot even tell that the Note is a Pentile screen or the One X is LCD. I mean at this point whocares? Are your eyes really good enough that you're going to notice the difference in normal usage or do you just want one to be better than the other for bragging rights?
It isn't like the major difference of 3GS to iPhone 4, both screens look pretty much the same to me and that was on the Note, so surely the GS3 has a better display than the Note.
ceo.mtcl said:
Hi bala, just for fun, I temp. switched back to my gs2 and now I see what I'm missing in my amoled screens.I currently own HTC one x and I've owned galaxu nexus in past. I hate to agree that I'll have to sell my one x once galaxy s3 will come out. I miss the amoled display.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same case with me too buddy.Samoled is like my life and i am in love with dis since i bought s8500.The colours,the contrast,the blacksss myyy godddd i cant live a second without this
pikulu said:
Same case with me too buddy.Samoled is like my life and i am in love with dis since i bought s8500.The colours,the contrast,the blacksss myyy godddd i cant live a second without this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ha-ha, totally agree mate. Will be selling both gs2 and one x to get international gs3.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using xda premium
you f****ng guys.. there's already a HTC One x vs GS3 comparison thread. In fact there have been a few and those have been closed and we were told to use this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1652250
for all discussion, but nope... someone has to start a new thread for whatever reason.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Coreym said:
you f****ng guys.. there's already a HTC One x vs GS3 comparison thread. In fact there have been a few and those have been closed and we were told to use this thread: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1652250
for all discussion, but nope... someone has to start a new thread for whatever reason.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OKK okk chill dude.. .. ..
And i request the mods to close this thread please . . . .
pikulu said:
OKK okk chill dude.. .. ..
And i request the mods to close this thread please . . . .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.. I'm sorry dude. I didn't mean to come off angry. Though I'm a little tired of seeing multiple duplicate threads, I don't mean any offense.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Coreym said:
Lol.. I'm sorry dude. I didn't mean to come off angry. Though I'm a little tired of seeing multiple duplicate threads, I don't mean any offense.
Sent from my SGH-I777 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never mind
BTW me too got annoyed from those posts like which colour,what botton colour,blah blah.And i like your comments on those posts a lot even it made me laugh several times
I didnt know that someone else already posted this nothing so i hadnt posted,i was not upto start a fight just wanted to help others and show what i got
I must say, it certainly feels great in the hand! Premium feel like a certain fruity phonemaker's phones, not the cheap plastic of a certain Korean brand... The screen is gorgeously crisp, viewing angles are good, and the gaming and video playback is smoooooth
For those in singapore, there are 2 Z demo units at the Wisma Sonystyle.
Sv: Just played with the Z...
It doesnt feel too big? I plan on getting this, instead of my iPhone 4. It's quite a jump from 3.5" to 5". Though I used to have an HD2, so it might just be a question of getting used to a much larger display.
Sent from my SGPT12 using xda app-developers app
I have a Nexus 4 which is a 4.7, the difference to a 5 will be minimal... most people I know that had iPhones and moved to larger Android devices had no complaints about it. Indeed quite the opposite...
The bets course of action is to go to a Sony store and see how it works for you.
Raedek said:
It doesnt feel too big? I plan on getting this, instead of my iPhone 4. It's quite a jump from 3.5" to 5". Though I used to have an HD2, so it might just be a question of getting used to a much larger display.
Sent from my SGPT12 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think it'll be a big problem.
I've heard lots of stories about people getting addicted to big screen after having one.
Sent from my awesome fridge
I've got the droid DNA and the .3 or whatever is noticeable. I gave my gf my sgs3 and can't imagine going back. I know the xz will have on screen buttons so that will take some screen away but with gmd gesture control it will be all HD, waterproof glory
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using Tapatalk 2
Raedek said:
It doesnt feel too big? I plan on getting this, instead of my iPhone 4. It's quite a jump from 3.5" to 5". Though I used to have an HD2, so it might just be a question of getting used to a much larger display.
Sent from my SGPT12 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Goodness, I can barely imagine using a screen as puny as the iPhone 4 screen. That screensize I easily understand for budget phones.
how did u find the screen is it better than s3 cuz i saw videos between them and the xperia z screen was little bright ??
Rashkae said:
I must say, it certainly feels great in the hand! Premium feel like a certain fruity phonemaker's phones, not the cheap plastic of a certain Korean brand... The screen is gorgeously crisp, viewing angles are good, and the gaming and video playback is smoooooth
For those in singapore, there are 2 Z demo units at the Wisma Sonystyle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh dang.. thanks for the heads up on Wisma. Can't wait to check it out!:good:
medo.yaseen said:
how did u find the screen is it better than s3 cuz i saw videos between them and the xperia z screen was little bright ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can you judge something like a screen, based on just a video(s)????
Dsteppa said:
How can you judge something like a screen, based on just a video(s)????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because rumours are better than facts
medo.yaseen said:
how did u find the screen is it better than s3 cuz i saw videos between them and the xperia z screen was little bright ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Judging the screen quality based on youtube videos is honestly starting to get ridiculous...
Akiainavas said:
Judging the screen quality based on youtube videos is honestly starting to get ridiculous...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly. Z's screen is beautiful and awesome. I find Super Amoleds disgusting (Personal opinion) I like true to life colors.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Had a quick play with one myself yesterday in a 3UK store, very smooth, very snappy, now seriously looking at pre order, if only i can find a way to pay off my last couple of months Voda contract to jump ship to O2
Sv: Just played with the Z...
Hi can you please upload a systemdump of it?
Sent from my LT28i using xda premium
Hello, I've been using the droid dna and experiencing bad screen quality issues with dead and stick pixels, and horrid backlighting. After the Sense 5 update I've resented the DNA more than ever. I'm hopefully getting a Verizon LG G2 in white, but it's a decent bit more than I'm selling this phone for, and wondering a few things.
1. Is the battery life better than the DNA?
2. Is the quality of the screen better in terms of perfect pixels and backlighting? I'm OCD about this.
3. Is it brighter than the DNA?
4. Are the back buttons easy to adjust to?
Thanks!
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
devouredsouls said:
Hello, I've been using the droid dna and experiencing bad screen quality issues with dead and stick pixels, and horrid backlighting. After the Sense 5 update I've resented the DNA more than ever. I'm hopefully getting a Verizon LG G2 in white, but it's a decent bit more than I'm selling this phone for, and wondering a few things.
1. Is the battery life better than the DNA?
2. Is the quality of the screen better in terms of perfect pixels and backlighting? I'm OCD about this.
3. Is it brighter than the DNA?
4. Are the back buttons easy to adjust to?
Thanks!
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery - 2,020 mAh in the DNA vs. 3,000 mAh in G2.. G2 wins. Battery life for me has been great.
Screen - Probably comparable, but not too sure. I like the HD/IPS display on the G2, a lot.
Back buttons - At first, I honestly didn't like the idea. Now that I have the phone, they don't bother me.
Hopefully my little bit of info will help. Compare specs between the 2. I'm sure others will give their opinions as well. I don't think you'd regret getting the G2.
Yes to all. I still have my DNA. It hasn't left my dresser drawer since the day i bought the G2, and i haven't missed it one bit.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using XDA Premium HD app
I like the UI, the snapdragon 800, and especially the screen. I've played with it a bit, I just wasn't sure if there were issues like the DNA. I got an LG G Pad 8.3, but the issues were horrid so it was returned ASAP. The biggest worry is dead/stuck pixels for me honestly.
Sent from my HTC6435LVW using xda app-developers app
Hey there chaps. I've done a little review after using the phone for almost a full year now and wanted to share it. Love the phone, it's been a breath of fresh air owning it this year. Let's hope the M8 carries on the awesomeness!
HTC One Review
Good review...you basically spoke for me when describing the phone and touched on the key selling points of the phone. Now to see what the new version has in store when in person.
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
Hey thanks. Yeh it's been a brilliant phone. I really hope the new one is good but atm it looks like HTC have done a bit of a Samsung and just done a (questionably) mildly better new device. Sad about the 5" screen though. Lower resolution then the M7 is the rumours are true.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
horsetastic said:
Hey thanks. Yeh it's been a brilliant phone. I really hope the new one is good but atm it looks like HTC have done a bit of a Samsung and just done a (questionably) mildly better new device. Sad about the 5" screen though. Lower resolution then the M7 is the rumours are true.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How could it be a lower resolution?
Still 1080p.... A lower ppi however, though that won't be noticeable
crixley said:
How could it be a lower resolution?
Still 1080p.... A lower ppi however, though that won't be noticeable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I just caught that too, must have meant ppi...no problem, I think we are all smart enough to know...maybe a slight edit due for the review for the less knowledgeable readers?
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
1080p on a 5" screen = lower ppi which is lower level of resolution IMO. Less is less. And though it is all 'apparently' above what the human eye can tell the difference between, I don't know why HTC have chosen what in my eyes is a downgrade with the new device. Unless it ends up being just rumours after all.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Dont think the new one will do that well compared to other devices it's going to have to offer something really unique and iam not really felling it with pictures and rumours. But iam sure it will be a great device and a good upgrade but not sure about it being a huge hit hope iam wrong though.
Sent from my HTC One using xda app-developers app
horsetastic said:
1080p on a 5" screen = lower ppi which is lower level of resolution IMO. Less is less. And though it is all 'apparently' above what the human eye can tell the difference between, I don't know why HTC have chosen what in my eyes is a downgrade with the new device. Unless it ends up being just rumours after all.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By writing this, it is apparent you don't know what resolution is.
Ppi and resolution are not the same thing...
It is the same resolution, not lower level of resolution.
Electrical engineer here btw
Also it is such a minute difference that it will not be noticeable.
Higher at 5 inches (4K for example) is just overkill
Ok guys ok, let's not let this thread become a pissing contest please, it started out as a positive thread and quickly escalated to "who knows more", which isn't productive and to be honest kinda immature for no real reason...
The resolutions are the same, screen is slightly bigger in New one which will lower the ppi a tiny bit which will probably be undetectable to the naked eye in the real world...only difference if there is any, will be the vividness of the colors since the pixels will be ever so slightly further apart...
Sent from my HTCONE using xda app-developers app
This has been the best phone I have had. Better than the S3 plastic poop I had before!
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
If anything lower ppi better battery
Those who had HoX like I did know how superb screen it had and it was only 318ppi +720p , I barely saw the difference on m7 with FHD +468PPI , why worry anyway ...amoled screens are pentile and lower resolution then ours and still are crisp almost as ours. Like I said no worries here unless you belive more is always better
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Shan89 said:
If anything lower ppi better battery
Those who had HoX like I did know how superb screen it had and it was only 318ppi +720p , I barely saw the difference on m7 with FHD +468PPI , why worry anyway ...amoled screens are pentile and lower resolution then ours and still are crisp almost as ours. Like I said no worries here unless you belive more is always better
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly....
I think 1080p is the upper limit on a phone. The bump to 2k or 4K is just going to cause unnecessary battery drain and is more of a "whose e peen is bigger" thing than a useful addition.
More battery drain, more taxing on the processor...
I could see on a tablet, but not on a phone 6 inches or smaller.
I still love my One. Nothing has yet to match it in terms of build quality and design. It's no wonder it won the Smartphone of the year award at MWC:
http://www.globalmobileawards.com/winners-2014/#cat_id22
and I agree with your all points especially the point you made regarding the Highlights Themes being removed :crying:. I have even contemplated reverting back to Sense 5.0 to get them back.
A year on, this phone is still blazing. Although...I made a switch to GPE (sinless) which honestly flies faster and has better battery. I don't really miss Zoe or any of the sense apps. The hardware is enough for me to love HTC.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
ahmadmfz said:
A year on, this phone is still blazing. Although...I made a switch to GPE (sinless) which honestly flies faster and has better battery. I don't really miss Zoe or any of the sense apps. The hardware is enough for me to love HTC.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have actually heard the opposite, that sense is much better as far as battery life. What is your typical screen on time?
crixley said:
Exactly....
I think 1080p is the upper limit on a phone. The bump to 2k or 4K is just going to cause unnecessary battery drain and is more of a "whose e peen is bigger" thing than a useful addition.
More battery drain, more taxing on the processor...
I could see on a tablet, but not on a phone 6 inches or smaller.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree
crixley said:
I have actually heard the opposite, that sense is much better as far as battery life. What is your typical screen on time?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sense is better for battery then GPE
horsetastic said:
Sense is better for battery then GPE
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
World make sense too (bad pun I know), since it would be more fine tuned for the one's hardware. I get great battery life on sense but not so much in the brief period I tried gpe.
crixley said:
By writing this, it is apparent you don't know what resolution is.
Ppi and resolution are not the same thing...
It is the same resolution, not lower level of resolution.
Electrical engineer here btw
Also it is such a minute difference that it will not be noticeable.
Higher at 5 inches (4K for example) is just overkill
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wasn't intending on this becoming a pis#ing match and I did state that it was only my opinion. I know the technical description of resolution however to me it includes the clarity of an image and that is down to the PPI. Of course a 5" and a 50" screen can have the same resolution and you would chose which ever one suited your needs the best but the 5" display will always show the image better than the 50".
If you look at the defenition of resolution you'll find that is actually means "the degree of detail visible in a photographic or television image" this is what equates to something being "a high-resolution monitor". Hence I have formed my opinion based on this.
Electrical Mechanical Design Engineer here btw
And, still to me there's no need for HTC to have upped the screen size to 5". Nothing wrong with the 4.7" on the One. It is an epic phone and the high PPI was a good selling point. I know the're probably just trying to compete with the S5 etc but to me the screen size should have been left alone.
Let's not forget that even 1080P is an overkill on our little 4.7 inch screens, my tv is 46 inches big with the same resolution as my phone! This is nuts! Why don't they take it down to 720P and gain a massive battery life boost