Overclock an Archos101 - Gen8 General

I've seen in the market apps that claim to boost CPU to 1ghz. Is this possible?
Has anyone here overclocked their A101 and what kind of results have you seen?

Yes, it is very possible but you have to have partial temporary root or full permanent root via one of the following methods in order for the ocerclock to work:
1. Archangel one-click (temporary) root
2. Chulri's Root (permanent)
3. UrukDroid (permanent)
SetCPU is an application that almost everyone uses (as well as myself) that is guaranteed to work. It is well worth the $2 if you want to buy it or "download" it from other sources.
I personally have full permanent root access to my A101IT via Chulri's Method (because I found that it was the simplest to install) and am running mine at 1200 MHz with absolutely no lag/freezing whatsoever.
My Settings with SetCPU Version 2.1.3:
Scaling ondemand
1200 MHz - Max; 300 min ☑ Set on Boot
Profiles
☑ Enable
☑ Battery < 101% - 1200 Max
Priority: 100 - 300 Min
ondemand
Advanced
(Leave everything here the same unless you know what you're doing here).
Hope this helps.

spicy_puerto_rican said:
Yes, it is very possible but you have to have partial temporary root or full permanent root via one of the following methods in order for the ocerclock to work:
1. Archangel one-click (temporary) root
2. Chulri's Root (permanent)
3. UrukDroid (permanent)
SetCPU is an application that almost everyone uses (as well as myself) that is guaranteed to work. It is well worth the $2 if you want to buy it or "download" it from other sources.
I personally have full permanent root access to my A101IT via Chulri's Method (because I found that it was the simplest to install) and am running mine at 1200 MHz with absolutely no lag/freezing whatsoever.
My Settings with SetCPU Version 2.1.3:
Scaling ondemand
1200 MHz - Max; 300 min ☑ Set on Boot
Profiles
☑ Enable
☑ Battery < 101% - 1200 Max
Priority: 100 - 300 Min
ondemand
Advanced
(Leave everything here the same unless you know what you're doing here).
Hope this helps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow - thank you.
1.2ghz sounds amazing given mine runs stock at 800mhz. A 50% improvement must be really noticeable.
I will definitely give this a try. Like you msay $2 is not much considering the hike in performance you get.
What effect on battery have you noticed?

My battery drains dead from a full 100% charge in like 2-3 hours on average if I'm using it the entire time but sometimes 4 hours if I use it like once an hour or so.

So the overclock does kill the battery somewhat. Never md though as you dont get extra performance for nothing i guess

I assume you have the overclock kernel as i can't set setcpu to 1200 without it

@Pete917:
If your tablet runs at 800mhz you have done something wrong.
Since 2.1.08 you can run the archos with 1GHZ just with the stock rom.

Hi Guy,
I used Uruk for root, after that I use Milestone overclock to set the frequency to one more grade to 1.15, but it seem not stable enough, it will also hang.
Anyone have such problem on overclock? Or what I need to do for the stable overclock.

To (SWFlyerUK): Yes, I have the zImage Overclock kernel found here For firmware 2.3.20:
Download here: http://www.mediafire.com/?pnbev44hk2m1346
File name: zImage_archos_2.3.20_recode09.zip (MD5: 7756BA280F3FEBAD23A528A10EB1D6B5)
To (jan_tsui): The problem might just be the Milestone Overclock because I as well am assuming you have an Archos 70 IT or 101IT? If that is the case, then Milestone probably does not work with your device so you should stick to the SDE and go from there.
As to my personal A101IT I keep mine on the exact above settings in SetCPU because I just so happen to always be around an electrical outlet, be in my truck where the DC power outlet is, or be on an airplane with my "Airline-to-car-adapter" so it doesn't bother me that my battery drains quickly because I always have quick access to charge it wherever.

Anyone have the OC kernel for UrukDroid 1.0?
I found in some forum that by using urukdroid initramfs.cpio.gz with ardatdat version zImage, but it seem not working for me, the system boot into main menu and hang. Is it the version conflict?

jan_tsui said:
Anyone have the OC kernel for UrukDroid 1.0?
I found in some forum that by using urukdroid initramfs.cpio.gz with ardatdat version zImage, but it seem not working for me, the system boot into main menu and hang. Is it the version conflict?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always use the overclock utilities like QuickClock advanced, or Droid Overclock, they seem to work great.
My personal experience so far with Droid overclock isn't that great, but quickclock with some tinkering and after a few reboots, I found a nice little stable 1.2ghz overclock for me. Sad that it can only have four steps though, really hinders any sort of life saving/overclocking abilities.

Scaryghoul said:
You can always use the overclock utilities like QuickClock advanced, or Droid Overclock, they seem to work great.
My personal experience so far with Droid overclock isn't that great, but quickclock with some tinkering and after a few reboots, I found a nice little stable 1.2ghz overclock for me. Sad that it can only have four steps though, really hinders any sort of life saving/overclocking abilities.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they aren't really getting the job done for me here. is there a noticeable difference?

leijae said:
they aren't really getting the job done for me here. is there a noticeable difference?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In terms of speed or difference between the apps?
In terms of speed, well, not really. I would say there is a difference in benchmarking(minor), and not much of a difference in gaming, while it does slightly up the fps in some games, most of them are bottlenecked by the gpu as well, so most of the games that run decent already will just run a little bit better but the ones that don't run well or not at all won't have much of a change. There are a few more points I could hit, but overall, I don't think it's really worth the jump from 1ghz-1.2ghz unless you absolutely require the extra horsepower or you're a power user with an addiction to making things that go fast, go faster.
The only thing I'd really think the extra speed could be actually useful is during HD decoding and/or software decoding with apps like mobo player(My personal favourite video app which offers software decoding which puts pressure on the cpu). Overclocking during those do offer a small difference(Yes, this is one of those times it is definitely worth it(until you run out of ram or the gpu starts bottlenecking then you're screwed)).

Related

Anyone with Froyo and OVERCLOCKED?

So now that I have Froyo, how do I overclock it?
I'm rooted with stock build (FRF50).
There have been a few tutorials out there but I'm not sure what is applicable now and whether they will still work.
If they do still work, can someone pls recommend a good one that will work for sure with Froyo?
Thanks lots in advance!
Hi there,
I've been running FroYo overclocked for a few days now and am absolutely loving it.
I'm running the leaked build that Paul uploaded, and running the pre-rooted kernel from Cyanogen. Other than that, I manage the CPU's speed with SetCPU, running at a max of 1113MHz.
The kernel can be found at http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=686627
codesplice said:
Hi there,
I've been running FroYo overclocked for a few days now and am absolutely loving it.
I'm running the leaked build that Paul uploaded, and running the pre-rooted kernel from Cyanogen. Other than that, I manage the CPU's speed with SetCPU, running at a max of 1113MHz.
The kernel can be found at http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=686627
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what he said...
Umm...
OT
...Android kernels don't get "rooted". Root on these phones simply means having the "su" app with suid set, and superuser.apk around to manage thos permissions. If you can put those two files in place with a stock kernel, and properly set the permissions, you have root.
endOT
That said, there appear to be two "packaged" solutions to OC your FroYo:
Cyanogen's update.zip (not only does it put in an overclockable kernel, it also roots your phone).
Pershoot's newly-posted kernel (this is what I'm running...)
Of course, if you are brave, you can always "roll your own". People are clearly doing this, as there are FroYo Nexus One's out there showing 1.2ghz speeds.
big_adventure said:
Umm...
OT
...Android kernels don't get "rooted". Root on these phones simply means having the "su" app with suid set, and superuser.apk around to manage thos permissions. If you can put those two files in place with a stock kernel, and properly set the permissions, you have root.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You also need ro.secure=0 in the default.prop file (of the ramdisk portion of boot.img). So you could say the kernel gets 'rooted' this way (correct me if I'm wrong).
(On the Motorola Milestone this is not possible even though you can add "su" and "Superuser.apk", although on the Droid you can)
has anyone really gotten a real world speed increase with the OC'ed cpu? Yes it can technically run faster, but do our phones ever really max out the cpu when we are using them? Personally I feel that the ram adds more to the speed of the phone than the cpu. But that just an opinion. I'll have to see about doing some testing to see what the active cpu levels are under use.
followinginsanity said:
has anyone really gotten a real world speed increase with the OC'ed cpu? Yes it can technically run faster, but do our phones ever really max out the cpu when we are using them? Personally I feel that the ram adds more to the speed of the phone than the cpu. But that just an opinion. I'll have to see about doing some testing to see what the active cpu levels are under use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can see improvements with benchmarks, but as far as noticing a difference... no, not really. There's always the placebo effect of "wow, this is so much faster with a ~10% overclock", but I don't think it's really a difference that you can pick up on. There are a lot of other things that could account for a 10-15% performance difference at any given time.
Granted, I could tell more of a difference on 2.1 than I can on 2.2 Froyo's JIT capability improves the efficiency to the point that you really can't tell a difference at all. Under 2.1, I at least felt like the menus were just a little snappier. Everything is snappy under Froyo though.
Clear as mud, lol?
side by side with a stock clocked n1 was the only way i could see a differance.
but its not a drastic differance, like a stock droid vs 800 mhz droid

[KERNEL] Clemsyn Version 11 PimpMyGtab Underclocking control

Releasing my kernel ver10 which has NO OVERCLOCKING but has Undervolting. I'm pretty happy with the speed of Tegra 2 and I think there are a few advantages in keeping our speed in stock. Advantages IMO are as follows
1. Better Battery life
2. Less heat
3. Stability (unless it is too undervolted)
Update 4/25/11
Releasing PimpMyGtab and My latest kernel ver 11 with no Overclocking, just stock Speeds..Underclock using PimpMyGtab
Here is the link on how to use PimpMyGtab
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1018411
** If you get a scaling_governor error upon starting PimpmyGtab. It means you need to set your governor by going to Terminal and typing echo powersave > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_governor or by installing CPU Master and choosing powersave in governor.
BIG THANKS TO CPASJUSTE for the app and kernel codes.
BTW, If you like my work, don't hesitate to buy me a beer
If you ike PimpMyGtab, make sure you buy PimpMyCPU (Source) from the market by Cpasjuste
Thanks.
Nice. I'm not a fan of overclocking, however undervolting DOES interest me. As soon as I get an opportunity, I may try this out.
Curious, what's the stock voltage?
OK, LMK how it goes.
Phoenix84118 said:
Nice. I'm not a fan of overclocking, however undervolting DOES interest me. As soon as I get an opportunity, I may try this out.
Curious, what's the stock voltage?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
stock - 750mv - 1000mv
Well I tried it out real quick, it works well (haven't verified battery life changes), but I had some questions:
Is there anyway to set the voltages explicitly? SetCPU didn't work with it (couldn't even change the freq or scaling governor).
I forgot your kernel doesn't support mounting the internal SD over USB. Is that something that will be fixed soon (assuming it's actually broken)?
I won't have my tab for a few weeks, sending it in for warranty replacement. So I won't be able to do further testing.
Thanks for the great work!
Hello clemsyn,
Try it out and battery life is soooooo gooood ... lot better than the OC 1.5GHZ one, of cause it run slower, but it's where i came to ask, if you could release one with the same voltage but for 1.2Ghz (which i guess it's stock speed)?
Many thanks for your hard work
y2k-inc said:
Hello clemsyn,
Try it out and battery life is soooooo gooood ... lot better than the OC 1.5GHZ one, of cause it run slower, but it's where i came to ask, if you could release one with the same voltage but for 1.2Ghz (which i guess it's stock speed)?
Many thanks for your hard work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will do, just busy with life at the moment
y2k-inc said:
Hello clemsyn,
Try it out and battery life is soooooo gooood ... lot better than the OC 1.5GHZ one, of cause it run slower, but it's where i came to ask, if you could release one with the same voltage but for 1.2Ghz (which i guess it's stock speed)?
Many thanks for your hard work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK here it is...this is basically stock voltage with OC to 1.2 ghz.
Thanks. Right now I'm tryingout the 700-900. Quadrant dropped from 2350 to 2150 going from ver9 to the UV.
I've been using the original kernel posted in this thread for a little while now. It has some strange slowdowns when the tablet first boots (from being powered off), but after that it runs great. Have not had any freezes, so it seems stable. Quadrant scores are ~ 2300.
clemsyn said:
OK here it is...this is basically stock voltage with OC to 1.2 ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks clemsys for this OC, but got FC every time i run Quadrant ... anyway back to version 10 uv for now
Hmmm, for some reason my pad won't run any of your Ginger undervolted offerings (can't get past my splash screen). But I'm very happy with Ginger9... Thanks!
dschach said:
Thanks. Right now I'm tryingout the 700-900. Quadrant dropped from 2350 to 2150 going from ver9 to the UV.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While the quadrant is down a little, I can't really tell any difference in performance when using the tablet. If the battery life improves then I will stick with this one.
sorry if this has been answered before, but the undervolted
kernel still has cifs support?
(just to check, you need clockworkmod to install this, right?)
albright said:
sorry if this has been answered before, but the undervolted
kernel still has cifs support?
(just to check, you need clockworkmod to install this, right?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it does and cwm is required to install
thanks soo much for this. I've been wanting to undervolt but the overclocking for me was a deal breaker. 1ghz is fast enough for any android app imo. Gonna try this soon!!!!!
clemsyn said:
OK here it is...this is basically stock voltage with OC to 1.2 ghz.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This one is perfect for me, and for some reason I am able to use quadrant for once... beer is on it's way...
Wont go past splash vegan 5.11. Installed it via cwm then whiped Calvin and cache partition. Any ideas?
extensive said:
Wont go past splash vegan 5.11. Installed it via cwm then whiped Calvin and cache partition. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems like your tegra can't take the underclocked settings.
Well that sucks

[Benchmark] Mobile Web Browser Comparison for Android

Hi Guys,
Like most of you I own a Iconia500 and I've tested a lot of ROM available on this forum. But hard to decide wich one to go with. the processing power is not all and the fluidity of the interface and the browsing are a lot more important to me.
So I've decided to test 6 Roms available on the forum with this:
Test protocol:
Fresh install
setcpu installed and locked to 1000Mhz
reboot and launch of the test
Here are the results:
Score 974 - ROM: Minimalist 3.1
Score 961 - ROM: Taboonay 1.0.6
Score 961 - ROM: Virtuous Thrive 1.0.1
Score 960 - ROM: HoneyVillain 1.04
Score 954 - ROM: Acer Stock Rom
Score 948 - ROM: Virtuous Picasso 1.1.0
Score 945 - ROM: Lightspeed 1.0
Score 940 - ROM: Virtuous Galaxy 1.0.5
Score 848 - ROM: Virtuous Xoom 1.1.2
I hope if helps,
Peace
and stock score ?
I got 954
sanaell said:
and stock score ?
I got 954
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, table updated.
Interesting tool, thanks for sharing. I get what you are after by comparing all ROMs at 1.0GHz, but don't forget that the more processing power you have (i.e. overclocking), the better your fluidity and browsing experience will be on any given ROM. I just ran a quick and dirty test (didn't reboot or anything) on my customized stock ROM with a 1.5GHz OC kernel with the "On Demand" governor (I used No-frills CPU control) and scored a 1222 with all bars being thicker than when running at 1.0GHz. Without overclocking I scored a 971. Even the stock kernel frequency tables are setup to be able to be OC'ed at 1.2GHz....so don't be afraid to goose that CPU a bit to get that tegra 2 performance you paid$ for
but OC = more power = less battery...
sanaell said:
but OC = more power = less battery...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but only when you are using it...after the web page has loaded the cpu scales frequency back down if you are setup properly. It really depends on how you use your tablet, but I don't notice much difference at all in battery life the way I use mine (web browsing with flash, email, occasional movies and games). I still have to charge it every night either way after 6-8hrs of heavy use. The screen takes far more battery than anything else...live wallpaper would likely take more battery per charge cycle than an on demand [email protected] depending on how you use your tablet. IMHO, OC'ing to 1.2GHz is a no-brainer unless you are one of those guys on the road that needs to get every minute of life out of it. If that is what you need, then the iconia probably wasn't the best tablet to buy. After you OC, it's hard to go back as flash/web pages etc. load quite a bit faster as shown by the benchmark test.
_motley said:
IMHO, OC'ing to 1.2GHz is a no-brainer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree. I didn't notice enough of a difference to warrant the loss in battery. I rarely even play any games and the games I play already run at 30 fps without OC so why the need to OC at all?
WereCatf said:
I disagree. I didn't notice enough of a difference to warrant the loss in battery. I rarely even play any games and the games I play already run at 30 fps without OC so why the need to OC at all?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Battery drain would depend on which kernel and governor you used and how you use your tablet. Some kernel sources I have studied have their OC current set higher than is necessary. The one posted by Richard Trip/Roggin is very reasonable by default and you can even adjust uV by frequency to improve battery usage. The games you mention are likely using the tegra GPU/hardware, so the OC won't help you a bit there. I noticed the performance the most with flash loading on web pages. Give me a little more power on demand and I am a happy camper. If you really need that extra few minutes of battery, then I can understand. But, think about it...if you are browsing a lot, you can do more within a shorter period of time so it all comes out the same in the end.
I did a comparison @ same frequency to be a base for real comparison, you can overclock or use custom kernel, still, it is just a base
_motley said:
But, think about it...if you are browsing a lot, you can do more within a shorter period of time so it all comes out the same in the end.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My reading speed isn't affected by the clockspeed of my tablet, so I'll still spend the same amount of time on a website..
WereCatf said:
My reading speed isn't affected by the clockspeed of my tablet, so I'll still spend the same amount of time on a website..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you are reading after it has loaded, the clock speed is the same as stock...it doesn't stay pegged at the OC speed all the time, the on-demand governor takes care of that for you
agreed but still the reaction is not instantaneous and some people just want to play with overclocking.
I found the benchmark tool interesting because it does not focus on pure force power but on user perception of the interface and after all I am a user
OP updated with a new ROM

[Q] ZTE Blade maximum stable overclock.

hey folks,
I would like to know what is the maximum stable overclock possibe for zte blade.
Im using cm7 nightlies and the max overclock frequency i can see is 864MHz. But my device will be stable only upto 691MHz or 710MHz.
What is your blade's max stable overclock.?
I heard some other android devices can be overclocked to their maximum value and remain stable at that value. What about ZTE blade. I think blade gets a lot of performance if it reaches stable at 864MHz. I don't bother the battery life or overheating really.
Is there any hack or something like that.?
672 max stable for me, my old one did 748. depends on your phone.
Has anybody had it over 800 stable?
wbaw said:
672 max stable for me, my old one did 748. depends on your phone.
Has anybody had it over 800 stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
once i used the userspace governor and got it to 806mhz and it was absolutely stable.
saaransh9 said:
once i used the userspace governor and got it to 806mhz and it was absolutely stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it doesn't really change the speed with that governor, it's designed so you use a program to set the speed yourself, except none exist, I assume it doesn't work at all without it. It needs something to write the desired speed to a system device, if nothing does that then it'll just stay at the same speed.
Test new speeds with performance governor, that keeps the cpu at it's maximum speed, it's not ideal for battery life but you can see if it really is stable at that speed.
I got my blade to 806 mhz, too. I stress tested it with setCPU, and it was stable.
I didn't have the guts to test higher than 806, though.
and I don't leave my phone on overclock.
cowscrubber said:
I got my blade to 806 mhz, too. I stress tested it with setCPU, and it was stable.
I didn't have the guts to test higher than 806, though.
and I don't leave my phone on overclock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just make sure that it isn't set to overclock on boot when you're testing higher speeds. Then the worst that can happen is it crashes & you know it doesn't work. Needs to be done in the name of science, so I know if it's worth enabling 864mhz & above in my kernels, or if nobody can ever get that high.
Nobody has managed to overvolt our cpu (msm7227) yet, I checked Google, it's probably not realistic to hope for it. I'm not sure it's possible at all. So whatever the maximum stable speed for your phone is, you're stuck with it, it'll never get any faster.
wbaw said:
Just make sure that it isn't set to overclock on boot when you're testing higher speeds. Then the worst that can happen is it crashes & you know it doesn't work. Needs to be done in the name of science, so I know if it's worth enabling 864mhz & above in my kernels, or if nobody can ever get that high.
Nobody has managed to overvolt our cpu (msm7227) yet, I checked Google, it's probably not realistic to hope for it. I'm not sure it's possible at all. So whatever the maximum stable speed for your phone is, you're stuck with it, it'll never get any faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont think then galaxy 3 1ghz is possible that someone was talking about without overvolting
My blade can go to 748, over its reboot after 10min at performance governor
saaransh9 said:
i dont think then galaxy 3 1ghz is possible that someone was talking about without overvolting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Idk, but my brother have a galaxy 3 and it's satble at 1.3Ghz..., when you read thread about kernel there is no OV
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
saaransh9 said:
i dont think then galaxy 3 1ghz is possible that someone was talking about without overvolting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a totally different cpu to the blade. I could add an option to make your phone run at 1ghz if you want, but it'll just crash straight away, the samsung has a faster & different cpu. We'd need more volts to even attempt it.
Your phone will never run faster than 710mhz stable, if that's what you can get. There is no possible way, other than buying a different phone, to make it run any faster.
I'm still interested to see if anybody can actually run their phone at 864mhz without it crashing, for those few people, they might be able to go faster.
@wbaw , thanks for the info.
Surprised to hear that no one attempted to overvolt msm7227 . I feel it is still a great cpu with adreno 200 included and many current low end phones are having it.
i can get 748 on performance i had it for about half an hour with no reboots
I saw on Antutu benchmark that some people got their blades to 1.5 ghz.
It's probably a hoax.
cowscrubber said:
I saw on Antutu benchmark that some people got their blades to 1.5 ghz.
It's probably a hoax.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, had see some with 3000 points, but its a build prop hack or somethings like this
Send from my awsome ZTE Blade!
Hm... The highest CPU rate without crashing was 710 Mhz for my Blade. Any higher values causes a unstable work or just rebooting.
My blade can handle 748 with sd writing but without 806 (but if you write to sd it crashes)
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA App
My blade have 710Mhz as most stable overclock, if i try 748Mhz Blade freeze.
Sent from my LG-P970 using XDA App
729MHz is stable. 748MHz used to freeze sometimes.
729 Mhz with SmartAssV2 & CM7.
748 is stable with Performance governor for me,even on reboot. Haven't tried 768 and above.
Sent from my Blade using XDA app
My device runs at 748M and stable, but crash if faster.

Overclock TF300 2,0 GHhz

Hi, how can i overclock my tf300t (Clean rom 2.5 oveclock 1.6ghz) to 2.0 Ghz? i read something in the forum but there isn't any kind of guide, i want know if the tablet is stable with this frequency, and if i risk something.
thanks
anthraxx90 said:
Hi, how can i overclock my tf300t (Clean rom 2.5 oveclock 1.6ghz) to 2.0 Ghz? i read something in the forum but there isn't any kind of guide, i want know if the tablet is stable with this frequency, and if i risk something.
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why would you need to overclock so high? Do you want it to explode! xD
Seriously though, would probably advise against it. It's like a whole 700/800 MHz higher than it's meant to run at stock. I'd say it would be very unstable, and probably wouldn't get very far battery-life-wise. 1.6GHz really not enough :/
mozyman said:
Why would you need to overclock so high? Do you want it to explode! xD
Seriously though, would probably advise against it. It's like a whole 700/800 MHz higher than it's meant to run at stock. I'd say it would be very unstable, and probably wouldn't get very far battery-life-wise. 1.6GHz really not enough :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.6ghz is ok? or i'll risk something?
I did that speed already. But it is very very unstable. random reboots within 10 minutes of use. also the battery life is very low. and the whole tablet is to hot.
i only was using it to see how fast it could go. that was the max. i am at Cutom Rom - 07/10/2012 - [email protected] Edition V02 - The Ultra Fast Rom - based on last Asus Firmware 10.4.2.13 at this moment.
this is very stable. balanced speed is 1.3 and thats oke. Normal performance speed is 1.6 but i only use that when playing games. You dont need those high speeds for daily use.
If you have the financial means to buy a new tablet - you can try all the time to work on this frequency.
With 1,6ghz i'll risk to break the tablet?
i used 2.0ghz about a week daily use. But now im lowered it to 1.8ghz and it is stable my everyday use. and battery lenght is very good maybe better than stock (i made undervoltage, so cpu uses -50mv less power in any speed than normaly/stock )1.8ghz use 1150mv and lowest speed use 775 mv)
Niksunen said:
i used 2.0ghz about a week daily use. But now im lowered it to 1.8ghz and it is stable my everyday use. and battery lenght is very good maybe better than stock (i made undervoltage, so cpu uses -50mv less power in any speed than normaly/stock )1.8ghz use 1150mv and lowest speed use 775 mv)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on tf300t? what kernel?
anthraxx90 said:
on tf300t? what kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep on tf300, and i compiled kernel myself, adding these features on it. So it is no downloadable this moment.
ok, and it's normal random reboot on 1,6 ghz? the problem is voltage or kernel?
anthraxx90 said:
ok, and it's normal random reboot on 1,6 ghz? the problem is voltage or kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, if you raise voltage up it may help, but i thing the problem is, that every tablet cpu is "diffrent" than other. This i mean, that these cpu is specsed in other speed than 1.6, 1,8 or 2.0ghz, and some invidiuals might work good in these higher speeds, some get randon reboots / freeze, or some of cpu:s dont even boot higher speeds. (i found out that when few people test my kernel, and it not even booted. And someone it will work fine.) This thing can "cross" by made kernel force cpu speed 1.0ghz at bootup (and i made this my kernel)
Also these tf300 tablet is manufactured atleast couple of diffrent cpu type /cpu id, so kernel have to had support all of these overclocking
It just like computers, some cpu can overclock higher than others, and if you go too high you need extra cooling, and in tablets, it is not possible, like normal pc's
*Most of this is my conclusion only, it may not be 100% accurate truth, but this how i see this thing. And if someone knows better etc, you can correct me *
Niksunen said:
well, if you raise voltage up it may help, but i thing the problem is, that every tablet cpu is "diffrent" than other. This i mean, that these cpu is specsed in other speed than 1.6, 1,8 or 2.0ghz, and some invidiuals might work good in these higher speeds, some get randon reboots / freeze, or some of cpu:s dont even boot higher speeds. (i found out that when few people test my kernel, and it not even booted. And someone it will work fine.) This thing can "cross" by made kernel force cpu speed 1.0ghz at bootup (and i made this my kernel)
Also these tf300 tablet is manufactured atleast couple of diffrent cpu type /cpu id, so kernel have to had support all of these overclocking
It just like computers, some cpu can overclock higher than others, and if you go too high you need extra cooling, and in tablets, it is not possible, like normal pc's
*Most of this is my conclusion only, it may not be 100% accurate truth, but this how i see this thing. And if someone knows better etc, you can correct me *
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok when do you release ur kernel's download? i wanna try
anthraxx90 said:
ok when do you release ur kernel's download? i wanna try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well im not home right now, so i dont have any 2.0ghz or 1,8ghz kernel with me, i have only 1.7ghz oc kernel, so you can test it if you want. But just like always, im not taking any responsibility, so test /use it with own risk. https://www.dropbox.com/s/vvmti4knwkeflde/Nixu_Kernel_OC_1700_v0.1_alpha.zip
i'm afraid now loool, what would happen exactly?
after flashing the kernel is locked to the screen asus, does not want to start
That won't happen I flashed it
Sent from my SGH-T989 using xda app-developers app

Categories

Resources