Related
Is there another kernel that I can use for this ROM that is overclocked over 1Ghz? Perhaps there's a way I can modify the existing kernel and rebuild it for what I'd like to have?
jeffc11 said:
Is there another kernel that I can use for this ROM that is overclocked over 1Ghz? Perhaps there's a way I can modify the existing kernel and rebuild it for what I'd like to have?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could be wrong, but without the source code this is impossible and since this is an unofficial developer release that will never see the light of day, I don't think Samsung will ever release the source.
You'll have to wait for the official OTA release of Froyo and then Samsung's subsequent release of the source.
As I understand it, there are no custom kernels for EB01 currently because there is no source available for EB01. This will not change until the devs have source available to them.
Thanks guys!
jeffc11 said:
Is there another kernel that I can use for this ROM that is overclocked over 1Ghz? Perhaps there's a way I can modify the existing kernel and rebuild it for what I'd like to have?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are referring to 2.4 on Eb01...no, they've not released the source code. What we have is all we got.
Here is a quick note on the kernel for acer Iconia A500..
The source is originally based on Tiamat's 1.4.4 kernel for Motorola XOOM, but with inclusion of code from acer kernel source release for drivers.
I dont know anything about git, and didnt have time to dig into a setup, but here you can download the kernel source.
my mod's already got this kernel included, so no need for attaching any boot images yet.. i did test it with m-deejay's galaxy rom, but lets see if the bluetooth issue can be fixed, and then some images made..
Download [Iconiap2-2-kernel-source.tgz] MD5: 888e3a177a2bd22dade1e5349c066a18
First =) Thank you.
Thanks, doesn't have to be git.
.tgz works, you could even mail CDs out and charge for them to be compliant with gpl.
Git is just easier for me, helps revert changes, try multiple versions.
Anyway, was.supposed to be a simple thanks
Sent from my LG-P999 using Tapatalk
copy .config1 .config ?
make ARCH=arm tegra_aconiap2-2-defconfig has errors!
Dexter_nlb said:
Here is a quick note on the kernel for acer Iconia A500..
The source is originally based on Tiamat's 1.4.4 kernel for Motorola XOOM, but with inclusion of code from acer kernel source release for drivers.
I dont know anything about git, and didnt have time to dig into a setup, but here you can download the kernel source.
my mod's already got this kernel included, so no need for attaching any boot images yet.. i did test it with m-deejay's galaxy rom, but lets see if the bluetooth issue can be fixed, and then some images made..
Download [Iconiap2-2-kernel-source.tgz] MD5: 888e3a177a2bd22dade1e5349c066a18
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do we need this for? If its already included in your rom then package as an update zip so we can flash with galaxy port. Thor v1 works amazingly well with galaxy 1.0.2
Sent from my Acer Iconia Tab A500 using XDA Premium App
pls bear with me if i asked a stupid question..
as i know, ICS is based on linux 3.0 kernel..
and Aurora has a linux kernel of 2.6.35..
thus why is Aurora labelled as an ICS rom?
It was same with Gingerbread. The unofficial ports were based on 2.6.32 but 2.6.35 was the main for GB.
So it is ICS, its simply using older kernel. Many unofficial ports for newer Android versions use the kernel that was published by manufacturer.
Sent from my U8800
Blefish said:
It was same with Gingerbread. The unofficial ports were based on 2.6.32 but 2.6.35 was the main for GB.
So it is ICS, its simply using older kernel. Many unofficial ports for newer Android versions use the kernel that was published by manufacturer.
Sent from my U8800
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blefish, rumours are that you are developing ICS with 3.0 kernel for u8800. Is that true?
uumeshh said:
Blefish, rumours are that you are developing ICS with 3.0 kernel for u8800. Is that true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep its true, check out his proggies: https://twitter.com/#!/rtammekivi
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/forum-462/announcement-23-cyanogenmod-72-rc1-released/
look there
FINALY! Something. I thought that they gave up!
Everyday i was checking for an update! FINALlyyy! Something.
EDIT!!!!
No 7.2 RC1 Download link. -.- Cant download cm7.2 rc1 for Shakira ( X8 ) FUUUU!! TROLLS.
Edit for Nikola -.- That is an ANNOUCMENT! Its not for Xperia x8
spevky said:
finaly! Something. I thought that they gave up! :d
everyday i was checking for an update! Finallyyy! Something.
Edit!!!!
No 7.2 rc1 download link. -.- cant download cm7.2 rc1 for shakira ( x8 ) fuuuu!! Trolls.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they are so big trolls
1+
NINJA EDIT i cant read AGAIN!
Cmon,no 7.2 for us!?shizz!!!
Sent from my E15i using Tapatalk
Hello.
Yesterday I tried to compile MiniCM from source, but I did not succeed.
However I compiled a vanilla Cyanogenmod from source (Github), so if someone here is brave and knows what they are doing they can try it. I use a kernel based on Alfsamsungs sources, and CM boots up and works here.
(no wifi cause my custom kernel, had to overwrite with my own modules to get it working)
I have not tested it much but I think MiniCM is a better choice.
NB: No need to post question or bugs, Im not a developer, I only compiled it.
Downloads:
cyanogen_shakira-ota-eng-24-April
gapps-gb-20110828-signed
All in one ICS layout v10-patch
All in one ICS layout v10-undo
prot_x said:
Hello.
Yesterday I tried to compile MiniCM from source, but I did not succeed.
However I compiled a vanilla Cyanogenmod from source (Github), so if someone here is brave and knows what they are doing they can try it. I use a kernel based on Alfsamsungs sources, and CM boots up and works here.
(no wifi cause my custom kernel, had to overwrite with my own modules to get it working)
I have not tested it much but I think MiniCM is a better choice.
NB: No need to post question or bugs, Im not a developer, I only compiled it.
Downloads:
cyanogen_shakira-ota-eng-24-April
gapps-gb-20110828-signed
All in one ICS layout v10-patch
All in one ICS layout v10-undo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can become a dev,just try
Sent from my E15i using Tapatalk 2 Beta-5
prot_x said:
Hello.
Yesterday I tried to compile MiniCM from source, but I did not succeed.
However I compiled a vanilla Cyanogenmod from source (Github), so if someone here is brave and knows what they are doing they can try it. I use a kernel based on Alfsamsungs sources, and CM boots up and works here.
(no wifi cause my custom kernel, had to overwrite with my own modules to get it working)
I have not tested it much but I think MiniCM is a better choice.
NB: No need to post question or bugs, Im not a developer, I only compiled it.
Downloads:
cyanogen_shakira-ota-eng-24-April
gapps-gb-20110828-signed
All in one ICS layout v10-patch
All in one ICS layout v10-undo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'll take a shot at it
prot_x said:
Hello.
Yesterday I tried to compile MiniCM from source, but I did not succeed.
However I compiled a vanilla Cyanogenmod from source (Github), so if someone here is brave and knows what they are doing they can try it. I use a kernel based on Alfsamsungs sources, and CM boots up and works here.
(no wifi cause my custom kernel, had to overwrite with my own modules to get it working)
I have not tested it much but I think MiniCM is a better choice.
NB: No need to post question or bugs, Im not a developer, I only compiled it.
Downloads:
cyanogen_shakira-ota-eng-24-April
gapps-gb-20110828-signed
All in one ICS layout v10-patch
All in one ICS layout v10-undo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yess,there is still hope
sent from my x8
prot_x said:
Hello.
Yesterday I tried to compile MiniCM from source, but I did not succeed.
However I compiled a vanilla Cyanogenmod from source (Github), so if someone here is brave and knows what they are doing they can try it. I use a kernel based on Alfsamsungs sources, and CM boots up and works here.
(no wifi cause my custom kernel, had to overwrite with my own modules to get it working)
I have not tested it much but I think MiniCM is a better choice.
NB: No need to post question or bugs, Im not a developer, I only compiled it.
Downloads:
cyanogen_shakira-ota-eng-24-April
gapps-gb-20110828-signed
All in one ICS layout v10-patch
All in one ICS layout v10-undo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What did u use to compile it ? Linux mint or ubuntu ? And did you try with nAa11 instead of your own compiled kernel ??
RohinZaraki said:
What did u use to compile it ? Linux mint or ubuntu ? And did you try with nAa11 instead of your own compiled kernel ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used Ubuntu 10.04, no did not try with other kernels. But the CM is not for alfs kernel (it has an kernel.sin inside the zip file), so my guess is that it also works with other kernels, like nAn11.
prot_x said:
I used Ubuntu 10.04, no did not try with other kernels. But the CM is not for alfs kernel (it has an kernel.sin inside the zip file), so my guess is that it also works with other kernels, like nAn11.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I downloaded your compilation...wanna see if i can fix it up here and there...may be fun...if i do succeed, i'll pm you
Sent from my X8 using Tapatalk
Hey,
I'd like to know if the franco kernel and paranoid Rom are built using linaro and if not how can they be?
Thanks in advance
- Hyflex
franco kernel isnt. but why would you want a linaro built kernel, the google toolchain produces much better results. you can build franco kernel yourself, from franco source, using the linaro toolchain if you want.
simms22 said:
franco kernel isnt. but why would you want a linaro built kernel, the google toolchain produces much better results. you can build franco kernel yourself, from franco source, using the linaro toolchain if you want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought linaro is supposed to be way superior and faster?
Hyflex said:
I thought linaro is supposed to be way superior and faster?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think that you fell into the linaro guys hype, as many people did. now its just more of a buzzword without any supporting evidence. anyways, the google toolchain absorbed the linaro benefits, and produces better results. there is also the linaro patches, what the fast roms are including now-a-days, thats different than the linaro toolchain, this applies to roms and not kernels. linaro patched rom do bring more optimations to the table.