Related
Can someone please tell me what they think is the best clock speed for their Mytouch 3gLE...List the cons and pros if you can...thanks
xtheishx said:
Can someone please tell me what they think is the best clock speed for their Mytouch 3gLE...List the cons and pros if you can...thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I keep my clock speed at 528 MHZ, the phone flies, but it eats up extra battery. Well worth it in my opinion.
C0dy said:
I keep my clock speed at 528 MHZ, the phone flies, but it eats up extra battery. Well worth it in my opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would 614 hurt my phones cpu?
xtheishx said:
Would 614 hurt my phones cpu?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tried the 614 method yet, but 528 is fast enough, I don't see a reason to go higher yet.
eclair roms...
and I don't use partitions...
xtheishx said:
eclair roms...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In my experience, I've never had serious slowdown on Eclair ROMs, even without overclocking.
C0dy said:
In my experience, I've never had serious slowdown on Eclair ROMs, even without overclocking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm Should i use partition, and if i do which ones? ext 3 or 4...i dont know much about partitions
i've been running at 614 for a month now, with no random reboots, and i do notice a smoother quicker response on everything
anything higher and i get random reboots, 633, 652 once in a while
692, pretty much a given
tnpapadakos said:
i've been running at 614 for a month now, with no random reboots, and i do notice a smoother quicker response on everything
anything higher and i get random reboots, 633, 652 once in a while
692, pretty much a given
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm sounds great same here, what rom?
xtheishx said:
Hmm sounds great same here, what rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in my signature....
cyanogenmod 5.0.8 test1 (5.0.7 and 4.2.15 before that)
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Best of 3 was 365 on unbranded 2.1 update 1
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App
Constantly above 1xxx with CM RC1/RC2 and OC787 kernel...but that's normal since it's overclocked
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
My result was 387 on 2.1 update 1 official Rom
Sent from my HTC Legend using XDA App
im_iceman said:
Hi All,
Updated my missus's Legend to 2.2 today and ran a Quadrant Benchmark test on it..
best of 3 was 903 (avg is about 860)..
What are you getting on 2.1... and what sort of scores are you getting on the custom ROM's out there?
Post your scores stating which ROM you're running..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using a normal 2.1 legend, benchmarked three times... 377, 332 and 361. Even more anxious to get froyo now then!
rajasyaitan said:
Azure, 2.2 = 4XX-5XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-11XX
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fixed....
Sense 2.1 was 3XX (4XX with OC)
However, even going from 3XX to 8XX (CM6.1) I did not see any speed improvements in games. OC DID improve the speed
Skardy said:
Fixed....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
rajasyaitan said:
You cannot get 11XX without OC'ing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right I forgot to specify
First run on rooted Sense Froyo was 915. Second run was 870. Third was 927.
rajasyaitan said:
Clean Eclair, 2.1 = 4XX-5XX
Azure, 2.2 = 8XX-9XX
Cyanogenmod RC2, 2.2.1 = 8XX-9XX
Never benchmark a Sense ROM before so I cannot provide such information.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
I have not programmed anything in android yet, but I know programming java for some years and I think that I can tell you why those spectacular benchmarks doesn't apply in most games.
The improvements have been made in the dalvik virtual machine, which is responsible for executing the java code of the applications.
But if programmes want more performance, they can write part of the program directly in native code, developed in C or C++. This code cannot be optimized (more), thus applicacions using JNI massively don't see any improvement.
I suppose many games should be using JNI because of the advantages in performance, so they're already 'optimized'.
Please, correct me if I'm wrong
--Edu
no0neX said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you ****ing-kidding-me? With almost stock 2.1 i had ~380. With azure 1.0.x now i have ~460.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
I'm with you my friend. Some people are just ignorant.
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my Legend using XDA App
rajasyaitan said:
I'm sorry Sir, but are you a ****ing kid? Let me try to be as nice as possible here. Do your homework before you bash other people. Go to the respected ROM's thread, or the OC thread and look around for other peoples results. That is the average result. 4XX on Azure? Seriously? Throw your phone to the wall and maybe that'll boost the Quadrant scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Skardy said:
Raja, the avarage Azure scores are 4XX because JIT is actually disabled in that rom, even though the option present and checked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
rajasyaitan said:
Actually it is enabled. I asked Ali about it before. But then again that was few months ago, I might be wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Skardy said:
Sorry my bad.
Seems like JIT was disabled only until Azure 0.6.
However I can confirm that my Azure 1.0.1 quadrant score was 4XX (which is kind of low...), and as I now have 1095 with CM6.1 I don't think theres a problem with my legend's performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Seriously? The last time I used Azure I got around 8XX. That was version 1.0 I think.
versifier said:
Sorry for the newbie question, but.. how do I run a Quadrant Benchmark ?
I know these numbers refer to the performance, and that the 2.2 scores a lot better, but in actual everyday usage - battery life, speed etc. what does this practically mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Install Quadrant and run it. Well, technically it is just numbers. But most of the benchmarkers do admit feeling the difference between lower and higher scores. Some say those are placebo effect, but meh. I don't buy that ****.
2.1 Stock
1st test
380
2nd test
381
3rd test
383
/T
hey guys, the quadrant score my rooted froyo i5801 is only a pathetic 289.... is there something wrong with my phone? any ways i can make it go higher?
thanks.
aeonstorm said:
hey guys, the quadrant score my rooted froyo i5801 is only a pathetic 289.... is there something wrong with my phone? any ways i can make it go higher?
thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes...You can check out lagfix and that bring the score to around 550 - 560
jaskiratsingh said:
Yes...You can check out lagfix and that bring the score to around 550 - 560
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats by the way do nothing... stay with your score, it doesnt matter anyway
I see thanks guys. haha because seeing the phone at the bottom of the ranking feels kinda crappy. how does the lagfix work? i read the threads but they seem to screw up the phone in certain ways
Sent from my GT-I5801 using XDA App
aeonstorm said:
I see thanks guys. haha because seeing the phone at the bottom of the ranking feels kinda crappy. how does the lagfix work? i read the threads but they seem to screw up the phone in certain ways
Sent from my GT-I5801 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's loads of "lag fixes" out there, designed to speed up the phone from perceived laginess. Some seem to do nothing more than inflate test score numbers (like Quadrant).
Do not worry about the score of one application. The true tests lie within the hands of the user. Are you happy with the phone? If not, then maybe it's time to upgrade to froyo, or a custom cooked ROM of Froyo.
Hi. I have my HD2 with android 4.0.4 with HWA. My friend has Galaxy mini with 2.3.7 (CM7 rom). And he has better 2D and 3D score in all benchmarks. Why? I don't think Galaxy is so new and so better than HWA HD2... So are the benchmarks lying or I have really worse performance?
And questions to devs or people who understand it: why I have 5000 points in I/O on Dorimanx's CM7 rom and on 4.0.4 HWA I have 1000?
Galaxy mini has only 320x240 resolution, so it has a better score.
OK, but shouldn't I have better CPU and GPU (I mean Adreno) to process more stuff? But ok, I am not grumbling, I was just curious.
And what with that I/O speed? Because in HWA roms write and read is very very slow.
kubekpop said:
OK, but shouldn't I have better CPU and GPU (I mean Adreno) to process more stuff? But ok, I am not grumbling, I was just curious.
And what with that I/O speed? Because in HWA roms write and read is very very slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With dorimanxs ROM you must of had data 2 ext enabled so the io scores were that high because of your memory card and on ics you are using your internal memory which is slower than ext4 partitions
Sent from my HTC HD2 using Tapatalk
kubekpop said:
OK, but shouldn't I have better CPU and GPU (I mean Adreno) to process more stuff? But ok, I am not grumbling, I was just curious.
And what with that I/O speed? Because in HWA roms write and read is very very slow.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
TBH, benchmarks mean nothing. All that really matters is the end user experience. If you're satisfied with the performance then it really couldn't matter less what you get in benchmarks. Think about it this way, a Galaxy mini might get a higher benchmark but could you really live with a tiny low res screen and TouchWiz (vs almost ANYTHING on the HD2)?
Thank you guys. I am happy about your answers. That's right. Mini has too small screen.
And one more thing: people (like Rick_1995) can play GTA 3 smoothly. I have still lags. I am not requiering 60fps, but ability of playing it comfortable Am I doing something wrong?
kubekpop said:
Thank you guys. I am happy about your answers. That's right. Mini has too small screen.
And one more thing: people (like Rick_1995) can play GTA 3 smoothly. I have still lags. I am not requiering 60fps, but ability of playing it comfortable Am I doing something wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly that he is overclocking and you arent?
elesbb said:
Possibly that he is overclocking and you arent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been trying to get GTA3 running too. Even after setting the governor to performance and details to minimum driving wasn't possible. Does anyone know how to do it? Should we increase volts?
I cannot overclock above 1.2GHz (I don't know why won't they add 1.6GHz from Dorimanx kernel).
kubekpop said:
I cannot overclock above 1.2GHz (I don't know why won't they add 1.6GHz from Dorimanx kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dunno why but for me on Typhoon CM7 there was no difference between 1.2GHz and 1.6GHz so I doubt there will be for CM9 either. I can give a +1 to GTA running poorly despite what others say.
kubekpop said:
Thank you guys. I am happy about your answers. That's right. Mini has too small screen.
And one more thing: people (like Rick_1995) can play GTA 3 smoothly. I have still lags. I am not requiering 60fps, but ability of playing it comfortable Am I doing something wrong?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nigeldg said:
Dunno why but for me on Typhoon CM7 there was no difference between 1.2GHz and 1.6GHz so I doubt there will be for CM9 either. I can give a +1 to GTA running poorly despite what others say.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GTA3 on my phone:
elesbb said:
Possibly that he is overclocking and you arent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CPU running at 998MHz (no OC), I'm using unreleased drivers so it could be them.
Daycrawler said:
I've been trying to get GTA3 running too. Even after setting the governor to performance and details to minimum driving wasn't possible. Does anyone know how to do it? Should we increase volts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
voltage wouldn't make a difference.
kubekpop said:
I cannot overclock above 1.2GHz (I don't know why won't they add 1.6GHz from Dorimanx kernel).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How can you tell that the cpu is really running at 1.6GHz and the kernel is just not faking it ? Qualcomm, the company which made the cpu never released any info about how cpu is clocked in hardware, or the pll limits, the multiplier limits, what internal clock logic checks for etc..
Are they going to be released?
Rick_1995 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's how it runs on my phone as well. I definitely don't define that as smooth. I've played it on my Mum's Desire S and it was far better, with a much higher framerate and better resolution (although that's probably due to the smaller screen) so I personally expect more from the game. Also, what about Real Racing? Happen to have a video of that? Because I've heard that's supposed to work without lag but it most certainly doesn't (Raging Thunder and NFS: Shift do but Real Racing doesn't). On a side note, thanks so much for all of the work you've been doing to keep this phone alive, without people like you in the community this phone would be completely dead
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
moulip said:
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got 22,941
Here is mine stock
Sent from my LG-LS980 using xda premium
I don't know about everyone else, but I get better benchmarks running stock odexed vs deodexed roms.
moulip said:
Hi all,
I wonder how is it possible that there are such differences between units. I mean I have never managed to reach more than 31500, and I see that some people, usually reach 35000+.
How is it possible ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download trickster mod from playstore, change your governor to Performance. Put your phone in the freezer for about 10 mins, then run your Antutu test...you should get 35k+. My average score is 36k+ with a high of 37.6k. Im on pure stock with a few Xposed tweaks.
mistermidas said:
Download trickster mod from playstore, change your governor to Performance. Put your phone in the freezer for about 10 mins, then run your Antutu test...you should get 35k+. My average score is 36k+ with a high of 37.6k. Im on pure stock with a few Xposed tweaks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I assume that could be a good trick, except that you have to be root and I don't want that. Plus, I am sure that people who get such high scores, are mostly full stock. That's why I wonder.
mchlbenner said:
Here is mine stock
Sent from my LG-LS980 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here it is how is it possible ? Really I don't see. Do you get this each time you run a benchmark ?
Maybe it is related to the fact that your phone is not the same as mine (I own a D802 from France) ?
just ran it on my stock rooted. 33.7k
Here is mine, stock and unrooted.
Sent from my LG-LS980
moulip said:
I assume that could be a good trick, except that you have to be root and I don't want that. Plus, I am sure that people who get such high scores, are mostly full stock. That's why I wonder.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you consider full stock? Because Im full stock just rooted. Also before I even rooted my phone I was able to get 35k+ just from the freezer trick.
mistermidas said:
What do you consider full stock? Because Im full stock just rooted. Also before I even rooted my phone I was able to get 35k+ just from the freezer trick.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Full-stock meant without anything non-genuine. Root included. Or with root but without any tweaks. Because, I don't see why being root could improve the results. Except if Antutu is able to alter the governor settings, while running ...
But from what you tell me, how can you get these scores and not me ?
Totally stock with no tricks involved.
34324 in Antutu.
That's after 1,30h of web browsing....
All your benchmarks just confirm the fact that I don't understand such differences. The only difference I see, is that this is not the same models than mine.
moulip said:
Full-stock meant without anything non-genuine. Root included. Or with root but without any tweaks. Because, I don't see why being root could improve the results. Except if Antutu is able to alter the governor settings, while running ...
But from what you tell me, how can you get these scores and not me ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like I said, I still scored 35k+ with just the freezer trick before I even rooted my phone. Just out of curiousity to see what a pure stock score what be. Only differences I see that would make a difference are the Carrier model. I have Sprint LS980 by the way.
mistermidas said:
Like I said, I still scored 35k+ with just the freezer trick before I even rooted my phone. Just out of curiousity to see what a pure stock score what be. Only differences I see that would make a difference are the Carrier model. I have Sprint LS980 by the way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that's what I think.
How much do you get in Quadrant ? Mine is 21k+
moulip said:
Yes that's what I think.
How much do you get in Quadrant ? Mine is 21k+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My Quadrant is around 20k ish, but I only ran it a couple times. I dont really put much stock in Quadrant since it hasnt been updated in forever.
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
crzykiller said:
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Beat me to it
crzykiller said:
For all the people complaining about bad scores, make sure your phone is completely cool before doing a benchmark. If you don't you'll get thermal throttling and you will get lower results.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True that. But I have tested at different times, when it was empty or just reset to factory. I still get the same results. And by the way I have disabled thermal throttling.