Related
Hi Guys!
I searched the forum and Google but I found nothing about the question, and what I found was very vague.
I would like to know how to overclock to 900Mhz on my GT540, I think I should increase the voltage to run the overclock, but could not find anything about this either. The maximum that can be stable is 806MHz.
They said it's only a few GT540 thats run on 900Mhz.
This information is correct?
Thanks for the reply! And sorry for my bad English.
Theres no need to overclock to 900, its will more than likly drain your battery in 6 hours. And not even make a difference to the performance.
ChriisM said:
Theres no need to overclock to 900, its will more than likly drain your battery in 6 hours. And not even make a difference to the performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Humm, but I am curious on Quadrant results... and maybe 100 will make difference in some games?
I Play much games on my Phone LOL.
And thanks for your fast response!
What games?
I installed SwiftDroid v2.0 M5 and OC to 806 MHz. Angry Birds (+ Seasons & Rio) doesn't lag any more . What do you want more ?
It's about how much you can overclock the our phone depends on which part of the silicon has been made the processor and depends on kernel. Unfortunately, there is nothing you can do.
Sorry for my bad English
Wystukane z mojego Swifta przy użyciu Tapatalk
Hummm OK so...
Thanks everyone for replying!
MalarKeY007 said:
Hi Guys!
I searched the forum and Google but I found nothing about the question, and what I found was very vague.
I would like to know how to overclock to 900Mhz on my GT540, I think I should increase the voltage to run the overclock, but could not find anything about this either. The maximum that can be stable is 806MHz.
They said it's only a few GT540 thats run on 900Mhz.
This information is correct?
Thanks for the reply! And sorry for my bad English.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can overclock my phone at 900mhz but it's not very stable.
I had mine at 850MHz for a while. 800MHz is a lot more stable.
My phone will boot at 900MHz, but it's not very stable. Without cooling, and voltage control, you can't overclock a phone too far without losing stability.
i tweaked mine to 1ghz
but it only lasts about 30 seconds then it crashes out and reboots
i can get 864mhz to run stable without trying
i am gonna upload a tut for the 1ghz thing and i want to know how did they get
864mhz stable
silent_bob52637 said:
i tweaked mine to 1ghz
but it only lasts about 30 seconds then it crashes out and reboots
i can get 864mhz to run stable without trying
i am gonna upload a tut for the 1ghz thing and i want to know how did they get
864mhz stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would be nice.
But 1Ghz is Danger, becuz our processor its make to 900Mhz. I think so.
MSM7227 is officially specified UP TO 600MHz
see link -> h**p://pdadb.net/index.php?m=cpu&id=a7227&c=qualcomm_msm7227
800MHz+ is already very good (+33% OC), got mine stable @ 880MHz (+46% OC)
How you get that stable?
sent from my gt540 mur4ik RC0 806mhz
Mine crashes when overclocked above 748MHz. But I don't mind.
Sorry I forgot: I use Mur4iks M4
There's no secret involved in this. All CPUs are manufactured to meet a guaranteed clock speed. That is the speed they have to meet in order to pass QC. Some CPUs will be able to run a little faster and some will be able to run a lot faster but all will be set at the default speed. The variance is just a factor of the manufacturing process. If you're lucky you get one that can do 900, if not, well you can't complain unless it won't do 600...
Sent from my GT540 using XDA Premium App
fishears said:
There's no secret involved in this. All CPUs are manufactured to meet a guaranteed clock speed. That is the speed they have to meet in order to pass QC. Some CPUs will be able to run a little faster and some will be able to run a lot faster but all will be set at the default speed. The variance is just a factor of the manufacturing process. If you're lucky you get one that can do 900, if not, well you can't complain unless it won't do 600...
Sent from my GT540 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, now is solved the question. Thanks for you heads up.
Sent from my GT540 using Tapatalk
Hi guys. I'm planing to overclock and I want to know what do I put for min CPU frequency and max CPU frequency?
I'm running 2.3.7 swiftdroid 2.0
Thanks in advance
make sure the settings are not set on boot, min 122 then for max slowly increase from 600 then so on.. if the phone hangs take out the battery. this way you will know the maximum the cpu can go
I have overclocked to 900mhz i tried
going further but didn't want to risk it!!
i should try some day!!
androidboss7 said:
I have overclocked to 900mhz i tried
going further but didn't want to risk it!!
i should try some day!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you shouldn't
Hi all. I just wanna share my research about two gingerbread firmwares: KPN and KPH. Everybody says KPN much more stable, no SODs, smooth, and etc. and KPH not stable enough, and have much SODs. but how about the benchmark result?
Sorry, I was forget to take a screenshot of the benchmark results.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Second: KPH (2.3.4)
Score: 1000 - 1500 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 1600 - 1900 (with CF-Root)
Wow, it's shocking. Even it has random SOD issue (stock or cf-root) but the performance is great. Angry birds, lags there are only small lags. On the benchmark reading & writing database it's really fast, graphic test fps almost same as KPN. And I think it has better battery, depends on the ussage.
Conclusion
In my opinion, KPN is stable enough but slow. And KPH is fair, the performance was great. About my ROM, fla.sh it's ready for packaging. But now, I will start over again and use KPH as base. How about you?
What was it about 2.3.4 showing up anomalous results on quadrant? Rumour or fact?
Edit: just ran quadrant on 2.3.3 kpn 1500+
Anyways kpn has a shorter wake time but slightly longer time for screen off.
consegregate said:
What was it about 2.3.4 showing up anomalous results on quadrant? Rumour or fact?
Edit: just ran quadrant on 2.3.3 kpn 1500+
Anyways kpn has a shorter wake time but slightly longer time for screen off.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow.. CF-Root? MicroSD high class? I just flash KPN and ran bencmark with result 500 -600. KPH will show high result (and getting higher after you run benchmark again).
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
chinoyray said:
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? But how about performance? I think KPH is better.
fla.sh said:
Wow.. CF-Root? MicroSD high class? I just flash KPN and ran bencmark with result 500 -600. KPH will show high result (and getting higher after you run benchmark again).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On ext4 with both KPN/KPH gives me benchmarks of around 1500, no difference.
Playing games, no difference.
So it comes to stability plus bln support
chinoyray said:
Isnt kph showing weird benchmark results that's why some people kept saying that it's irrelevant?
Anyway, good luck!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree for this. Benchmark on KPH just to good to be true.
From my experience, KPN is better than KPH, KPN more smooth than KPH. But i don't try it on game. IMHO, the real benchmark is game.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use KPN, and the results of my benchmark 1600 + +, and has not happened SOD. ...
KPN play game more better than KPH
sorry my bad english. .
my KPN benchmark is 1734. with cfroot of course. when i installed gingerreal RC1 (KPN as base), my benchmark became 1819. everything is so smooth. except for the android keyboard which is btw still bugged with gingerreal. but it doesn't matter since gingerbread keyboardis so much better. so legit. )
Wow! Thoose values are greater than expected... Now I'm packaging my ROM
Waiting for fla.sh's package now....
Sent from my GT-S5830 using XDA App
fla.sh said:
Hi all. I just wanna share my research about two gingerbread firmwares: KPN and KPH. Everybody says KPN much more stable, no SODs, smooth, and etc. and KPH not stable enough, and have much SODs. but how about the benchmark result?
Sorry, I was forget to take a screenshot of the benchmark results.
First: KPN (2.3.3)
Score: 500 - 600 (stock, without any modification applied)
Score: 600 - 1200 (with CF-Root)
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey fla.sh,
my Quadrant standard benchmark results for stock KPN and only a few tweaks in build.prop are 1000-1200 everytime. And for me KPN looks better then KPH, althoug i didn't try KPH for a long time now.
What about CF-root for KPN and SOD's? Are you sure? You know whats the problem with it exactly? I'm testing this to and i must say that i didn't have SOD'S for a week now being on only stock KPN.
Cheers.
fla.sh said:
When you've applied CF-Root, you will get random SOD issue. I'm trying to play Angry Birds, I can see the lags. And the battery will drain faster than KPH. On the benchmark reading & writing database the process was so slow, but on the graphic test it has greater fps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i never had SOD with cf-root and KPN. i don't know about the battery drain since even with KPH, my battery drains fast.
quadrant scores are clearly not reliable. i am better off with kpn as it does not have sod problem.
Scores
There is a great difference in the scores.
But I'm just happy using KPH.
1jesper1 said:
There is a great difference in the scores.
But I'm just happy using KPH.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't revive dead topics
Sent from my MSM7227 with Adreno 200 using XDA App
EmoBoiix3 said:
Please don't revive dead topics
Sent from my MSM7227 with Adreno 200 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This tread just contains interesting information I had never seen before.
This goes about 2.3.3 and 2.3.4 firmware, so it's recent.
edit: Nevermind.. I wasn't aware that this is an old topic.
Sorry guys but why you use quadrant ? If you try other app like Antutu or SmarthBench i think that it willi be better. In my case the results on Smarthbench are:
498 / 982 tweak enabled; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
479 / 986 Tweak disabled; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
501 / 960 Tweak disabled; V6 supercharged enabled belaced 3; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
503 / 929 Tweak disabled; V6 supercharged enabled belaced 3; 97loopy_smoothness; 7/09/2011 BlackHawkROM KPN
On antutu bench i have: 1797
I know that they aren't stock firm but the base is the same....
hi people as the title says my phones cpu seems to be weakening..... when i was using utopia i could oc my phone to 900MHz and quadrant advance it would score around 4000 point for cpu but now after going to swiftdroid rc4 it could only go to 880MHz and anything above will hang the phone... and at 880MHz it could score only less then 4000 points for cpu....
it could be cpu getting old or just the rom. im open to all ideas
I would think its the rom/kernel
Brought to you by DonDizzle
2.3.5 has many features and benefits but its still in active development so ive also found o/c to not be as stable but hopefully as we progress will get better
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
dondizzle915 said:
I would think its the rom/kernel
Brought to you by DonDizzle
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1, i think it's the rom too. try utopia again.
Sent from my GT.. ah, screw it!
possible.. but i have always been able to oc to 900 MHz on all roms :/
bs828 said:
possible.. but i have always been able to oc to 900 MHz on all roms :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, maybe the new swiftdroid's just not that good at it (yet?). Each version sees changes to the kernel, so it's not impossible something changed for the worse.
Sent from my GT.. ah, screw it!
On Swiftdroid v1.8, it used to crash on 900mhz on mine. But now it crashes when running for a while on that frequency. It's more stable than before but not good enough for 900mhz.
after letting it settle awhile i can now oc to 900 MHz again but only for a little while after that it hangs :/ looks like no more 900 MHz for me
If I play a game or something it hangs
I get around 30 seconds before it hangs
On my device, when I underclock under 600mhz and restart. It turn into a bootloop. I have about a minute to change the settings (hopefully) before it restarts again.
Johny ill make sure RC7 is 600-680 on boot. ; )
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
According to System Tuner, it is always 600mhz on boot, but it quickly changes to the set clock speed after a moment. If the the change happens during the loading of apps from the launcher, it crashes (if I underclock under 600mhz).
So, the game is out for high-end devices (only?). On our U8800 in B518 rom for me it kind of lags (~15-19 fps). Have you guys done some tweaks to make it run better?
I haven't managed to get it running.
Blefish said:
So, the game is out for high-end devices (only?). On our U8800 in B518 rom for me it kind of lags (~15-19 fps). Have you guys done some tweaks to make it run better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i dont think its for high end devices only cause i see people running it fine on xperia neo at 1ghz single core 205 adreno. i will try it and i will come back with report. If it lags it will be due to 2.3.5 beta bugs
OC to 1500 MHz, delete "audio" file from SD data and game will be much more playable.
Davoss said:
OC to 1500 MHz, delete "audio" file from SD data and game will be much more playable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That should work, but i saw somewhere a files for armv6, so maybe if we use them, we get even more performance.
OC on 1.5Ghz on CM7 totally works quite good, even without any other tweaks. (franco kernel)
Tried in latest miui by ret4rt. Got files and etc, but when i start game, it lags on loading. Then phone tells that gta3 has stopped working. I'll try in cm when i have time.
It installs, but yeah, latest MIUI from ret4rt was lagging with it.
Got it running by redownloading data. Had low fps even with 1,5ghz. I'll try without sounds later, and maybe search some ways to improve fps.
Davoss said:
OC to 1500 MHz, delete "audio" file from SD data and game will be much more playable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any specific file or everything in the audio folder?
Whole audio file, but make backup.
I got it running very well with these "tweaks"
ARMv6 cahce from here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=20600524
OC phone to 1,2ghz
With this gta3.set file: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20619295&postcount=14
stock
I got it working on a stock U8800pro with stock 2.2 Froyo..the game runs pretty much smoothly, it lags only when the maps are being loaded..but its completely playable
My phone hangs and reboots after some minute playing.. 2.3 beta 2. I should try stock kernel, my backup boot.img anyone know where to get?
Sent from my U8800 using Tapatalk
i got my u8800 oc'ed at 1800mhz and deleted audio files, its pretty playable, it only lags sometimes but not much
i noticed the full game (500mb) was stored in my sd card, is there any chance on making it run on internal storage and will that make the game run smoother? if so, tell me how please ^^
I'm running it smoothly on my stock x5 There is only rare minimal lag.
If it lags on your phones, u can reduce effects in the game files...
Sent from my IDEOS X5 using XDA App
UnknownAX said:
I'm running it smoothly on my stock x5 There is only rare minimal lag.
If it lags on your phones, u can reduce effects in the game files...
Sent from my IDEOS X5 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The new 2.3 stock then?
Do you mean use the linked data packs?
My phone hangs and reboots after a couple of minutes of gameplay (gaming or watching the videos) I cant even get to the first save point.
Tried with 2.3 beta 2 and CM7.1-geno.
andreasha said:
The new 2.3 stock then?
Do you mean use the linked data packs?
My phone hangs and reboots after a couple of minutes of gameplay (gaming or watching the videos) I cant even get to the first save point.
Tried with 2.3 beta 2 and CM7.1-geno.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1.No, I mean the stock 2.2.1 .
2. What linked data packs?
3.I did just delete the game becourse Gangstar MV is better/more fun atleast
Sent from my IDEOS X5 using XDA App
UnknownAX said:
1.No, I mean the stock 2.2.1 .
2. What linked data packs?
3.I did just delete the game becourse Gangstar MV is better/more fun atleast
Sent from my IDEOS X5 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"u can reduce effects in the game files..."?
When play couple minutes screen freezes and softkeys or power button wont work, only way is pull battery out.. is there any solution? Ps. Im using geno's cm7 with 35 kernel
tapatalked
CyanogenMod 7.2 Nightly for U8800
About
This rom is compiled from latest CM7.2 source with kernel 2.6.35.
Features
Kernel support overclock to 1804MHz.
Default speed to max 806MHz, min 245MHz, ondemand governors.
Compcache is default to 18%.
All languages supported by CM are included. Default to english U.S.
Rom manager and Google apps are not included.
Please down Google apps here (http://cmw.22aaf3.com/gapps/gapps-gb-20110828-signed.zip).
Download
http://code.google.com/p/cm7-u8800/downloads/list
Installation
You must have upgraded to the official gingerbread rom and installed CWM recovery 5.0.2.7.
You must wipe data for first time installation.
It takes about 3 minutes to install the rom and 3 minutes for first boot.
Restart the phone several times after first boot, then install google apps, that should avoid some strange behaviors of the rom.
It is better to wipe cache and Dalvik cache for update.
Credit
Thanks to CyanogenMod team, genokolar, dzo, stockwell and other developers of the u8800.
History
2012-Jun-29
Updated
updated CyanogenMod source.
updated audio, omx, egl library.
sound quality is as same as official rom,
graphics performance should be improved.
default compcache to 18% (may be too high).
known issues
1) Mute camera shutter option is not working
Settings -> CyanogenMod Settings -> Sound
work around, rename or delete the shutter sound file
/system/media/audio/ui/camera_click.ogg.
2) taking video with wrong color and very low frame rate.
2012-Jul-04
fixed recording video with wrong color and very low frame rate
enable SRS audio processing
disable VSYNC
Will have the Portuguese language? Thank you.
It includes all languages supported by android, I didn't check all of them though.
wmi543 said:
It includes all languages supported by android, I didn't check all of them though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, I'm just asking because Geno dont has the Portuguese ... if this had was very good.
Did enyone try this rom already ??
Sent from my U8800 using XDA
I'll test it tomorrow.
So far so good.. no complaint.. will test battery life..
Sent from my u8800 using XDA
its a very good rom, so far so good, but... its hardware acceleration active?
my GPU scores in antutu are very poor
368-1200 ondemand
antutu 2.8.2
total score 2723
gpu score 588
And games and UI are very lagy :S
EDIT: debug.composition.type=gpu in build.prop makes no diference
kaza said:
its a very good rom, so far so good, but... its hardware acceleration active?
my GPU scores in antutu are very poor
368-1200 ondemand
antutu 2.8.2
total score 2723
gpu score 588
And games and UI are very lagy :S
EDIT: debug.composition.type=gpu in build.prop makes no diference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now u mention it. I think u re right.. feel a little bit laggy..
Sent from my u8800 using XDA
kaza said:
its a very good rom, so far so good, but... its hardware acceleration active?
my GPU scores in antutu are very poor
368-1200 ondemand
antutu 2.8.2
total score 2723
gpu score 588
And games and UI are very lagy :S
EDIT: debug.composition.type=gpu in build.prop makes no diference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The default max cpu speed is 800MHz, change it to 1000MHz should help to improve the speed.
You may also try to change the model name in build.prop, pls refer to the second post in this thread (http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1048813) to improve game perforamce, I didn't test it myself though.
wmi543 said:
The default max cpu speed is 800MHz, change it to 1000MHz should help to improve the speed.
You may also try to change the model name in build.prop, pls refer to the second post in this thread (http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1048813) to improve game perforamce, I didn't test it myself though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have my build.prop edited to Desire HD and i am using 368MHz min and 1.2HGz max with ondemand and didnt improve, everithing seems to run at 22-24 fps
yep, agree.. temple run and fruit ninja seems bad..
have experienced such bugs in aurora ics but now its ok
Sent from my U8800 using XDA
So will be a upgrade for all those problems on Graphics ?
i think the problem is just that ...
anyway is there a way to unistall the ADW launcher and this File Manager ?
Edit: also there any update of market that you can tell us plz (because of the compatibility), send me the download via PM plz
Januh said:
So will be a upgrade for all those problems on Graphics ?
i think the problem is just that ...
anyway is there a way to unistall the ADW launcher and this File Manager ?
Edit: also there any update of market that you can tell us plz (because of the compatibility), send me the download via PM plz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have time to check the graphics yet, besides it is quite ok on my phone.
I've uploaded a new build, it should be the final release of CM 7.2, but I doubt there is much differences between the last build and the new one regarding graphics performance.
You can use Taitanium Backup to remove those app, regarding market app, once you install the google apps and run market, it will update itself, if you got trouble with the update, try clear the data and cache of the market app.
Settings -> Applications -> Manage applications -> All -> Market
Did anyone try new version ???
What about low quality sound issue ???
Sent from my U8800 using XDA
Did enyone try new version ???
What about low quality sound issue ???
Sent from my U8800 using XDA
Stopa said:
Did enyone try new version ???
What about low quality sound issue ???
Sent from my U8800 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've uploaded a new build, pls read first post for details.
it work with atmel screen?
wmi543 said:
2012-Jun-29
Updated
updated CyanogenMod source.
updated audio, omx, egl library.
sound quality is as same as official rom,
graphics performance should be improved.
default compcache to 18% (may be too high).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nope.avi
Metsuki19 said:
nope.avi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
built-in movie player doesn't support avi, use other player such as mobo player.