Database Users

Quadrant scores...

please post your quadrant scores so we can compare!

Quadrant doesn't mean much
even when you hit 2000+ score, your device still performs about the same in real life.
think about it

not sure i agree - after lag fix, my quadrant scores jumped up to 2109 to 2312 (e test ran)
and i notice Market opens now almost instantly, same with youtube
other apps, all appear to be opening faster, some only slightly faster while others i can major improvement

either way quadrant is definitely miz and we need something better. It's like looking at 3D mark scores, sites like Tomshardware and Anandtech might post them, but they specifically state how superfluous they are.

2200
Firmware JG5 + RyanZA's lag fix

alovell83 said:
either way quadrant is definitely miz and we need something better. It's like looking at 3D mark scores, sites like Tomshardware and Anandtech might post them, but they specifically state how superfluous they are.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my though

Also, quadrant only tests specific things.. Benchmarks are a tool, and it's easy to optimise for them, with much less gains to everything else..

1020 no lagfix jp2 "hk"
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

Around 2500-2700

2244 using one click RyanZA's lag fix on JF5 firmware
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

I got 2350 with lag fix.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App

1675 lagfixed ^^ idk how ppl get 2K+

Not that it matters, but standard bell firmware, rooted and lagfixed:
2144

2245 and very happy.
Sent from galaxy s. JG4 + oneclick lag fix version 2.3

Andrewwelton said:
Not that it matters, but standard bell firmware, rooted and lagfixed:
2144
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact same here.

I wish people would stop posting quadrant requests everywhere. Any developer can tell you they don't always mean much..

ZSJH1 + OCLF
2121
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
2241

2240
Stock JF4 + RyanZA's One click lagfix.

larryccf said:
not sure i agree - after lag fix, my quadrant scores jumped up to 2109 to 2312 (e test ran)
and i notice Market opens now almost instantly, same with youtube
other apps, all appear to be opening faster, some only slightly faster while others i can major improvement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you even know why this happens? It just shows that the overall score is meaningless.
Yes, the lagfix makes the phone more responsive but you can compare it to other scores with the fix in place. You COULD get Quadrant Advanced and compare all the other bits (not I/O).

I got 910 with everything stock
Sent from my GT-I9000M using XDA App

Ridiculously high quadrant score

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I've been reading people say theyrebgetting low scores for the ota froyo so I decided to try it myself and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Ya, I'm getting 2k + also. Linpack is also running very fast with best of 342ms. I'm impressed. It's not only scoring great in benchmarks, but also as you mentioned very responsive.

Which versions did you guys flash, and which theme?

Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks

It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.

Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.

bobdude5 said:
and I got 2200..ithe only I did was add a theme. I dont. Really care for quadrant scores but phone phone has become so much more responsive since I updated.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let me guess, the Christmas (or another) theme based on Quantum 1.5 ROM? That ROM had a specific configuration to explicitly display the futility of quadrant scores.

WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.....
Sent from my spot on the earth.

Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047

Electrofreak said:
It's been said time and time again.
Quadrant is an awful benchmark. Do not use it.
I scored 2597 on Quadrant using a DK17 ROM with a stock clocked CPU about a week ago.
So please, stop using Quadrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Then what other benchmark is non-biased?

NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, same here.

NYYFan325 said:
Just for ****s and giggles I just ran quadrant to see what the "real" 2.2 score should be. I'm on the standard de-odex rom, no themes
I scored a blistering 1047
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yerp. 1050 here on stock update.
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

WhiteWidows said:
Yet another post that should be in the GENERAL FORUM this has nothing to do with development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you kidding me i could have sworn I was in the general section when I posted this! I think there's something funky going on witht the xda app
Sorry about that

ghostrid3r said:
Please provide details about your setup (ROM/theme/package) so we can all try to reproduce your results.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The the stock rooted deodexed one..and the theme is nova night..but I doubt that has anything to do with the score

Linpack scores on stock xoom after 3.0.1

My score in linpack are now around 35 sin e I updated....that's a drop of 10 to 15 points from before the update. Anyone else notice a drop in linpack?
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

Do you have flash installed?
Also, what app do you use to check the linpack? [edit] nevermind. I found it.
33.614.
3.0.1 with flash installed.
36.14 when I uninstalled flash.
I know it's the same range, but it's strange how everything seems faster without flash installed. I've uninstalled and reinstalled it twice today to see if it made a difference, and I think I'm going to leave it uninstalled until next week.

Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?

First thing I did was unistall flash and then reboot....no good. Then I unintalled most of my apps, reboot, retest, same results. Using linpack app from market.
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk

Does your Linpack score somehow have something to do with how your Xoom performs, real world?

muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...

ilogik said:
The iPad2 is murdering the xoom in most benchmarks, perhaps it is the better device after all...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, but that cannot be the only thing at work here. I mean the iPad2 is scoring 5x better than the Xoom in linpack. I highly doubt that the hardware is 5x better than the Xoom, especially when the iPad2's CPU is only clocked at 900mhz.

muyoso said:
Speaking of Linpack, how does the iPad2 score this:
Is that just an Android vs iOS thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wth... just, wth.

That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App

Usmc7356 said:
That's got to be photoshop. Who ran the test, using what, and how many times?
Sent from my Xoom using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Anandtech. I would trust their numbers over any other site I can think of. They are legit. You can go check out the numbers in their preview of the iPad2.
Link to preview of iPad2:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2
link to relevant section:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dualcore-cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2/2

Quadrant Benchmark for Galaxy Note - 4308 (and probably higher)

Perhaps the Quadrant Utility tool for Benchmarking needs an upgrade - the screen size is too large yet the speed test (FPS) is hidden under the screen's bottom partly.
The note must be pretty quick!
Anyways - I scored a benchmark of 4013! This was achieved after ensuring that task manager had all apps exited and memory cleared.
Update: On my third benchmark in a row I got 4308. You may check my blogs later today as I upload all the performance images.

the note is pretty good. samsung did a good job of optimising the drivers, and the GPU is surprisingly more powerful than my atrix despite the higher resolution.

Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave

I got a score of 4600 using an Interactive governor on a kernel I rolled. This makes it awesomely faster than my paltry Nexus One . Shame Quadrant is pretty meaningless as a cross-device benchmark though....

foxmeister said:
Quadrant doesn't need an upgrade - it needs throwing in the bin!
It's a deeply flawed benchmark that tells you pretty much nothing about the overall performance of your device.
Regards,
Dave
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a better app to suggest?

rdosti said:
Do you have a better app to suggest?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AnTuTu maybe?

Got an awesome 4395! I'm amazed by the phone's performance on Benchmarks, yet I find it just as fast as my HTC sensation on the usual day to day usage. hope updates will improve speed!

Vellamo by Qualcomm
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

kunalparwani said:
AnTuTu maybe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which app do you use to overclock??

i dont remember exactly how much i got with quadrant, but with antutu i reached ~7050 score with criskelo ics rom v2, ondemand 500-1.4ghz ;D

Darky, franco kernel
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
MfG a_halodri

RocketRom v23
Sent from my GT-N7000

How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3

I do nothing. Only flashed Darky Rom and Franco kernel v10.
MfG a_halodri

MR.change said:
How do you get such awesome numbers?
I got 2810 on my stock deodexed LA6 ,and 3691 on cm9 v3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much really RocketRom with Franco #8 kernel. That's it
Sent from my GT-N7000

It is the kernel from Franco, he is great:thumbup:
MfG a_halodri

gHz show-off

Hey all,
Just wanted to show you how great the Nexus S is!! "img.tapatalk.com/5658d096-434f-704f.jpg" (just copy everything between " " to your toolbar) its running at a stunning 1.6gHz!!! It became a bit too overclocked sometimes, so I stepped back to 1.3gHz... not bad either, but still less. Show how far you can push your Nexus S (4G) in this thread by posting a screenshot that shows on how much gHz you Nexus S can run.
IF YOUR PHONE ISNT WORKING ANYMORE, BECAUSE YOU PUSHED IT TOO FAR. ITS YOUR OWN MISTAKE. IF YOU POINT AT ME BECAUSE YOU THINK ITS MY FAULT... I WILL BE LAUGHING AT YOU.
Greetzz, Jojoost

jojoost said:
Hey all,
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fixed......

this 1.7ghz was from almost a year ago, it ran for almost a whopping 30 seconds before freezing.
but 1.6ghz ran stable, just battery life was terrible

What's the default clock speed? I run my 1.2 at 1782...
Sent from my ICS Splashed using xda premium

Can't go past 1.2 without rebooting on intense CPU usage
Heck I can't even run Trinity kernel.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App. Developer of brickROM, and OP of XDA Thread of The Year 2011.

KrnlPanic said:
What's the default clock speed? I run my 1.2 at 1782...
Sent from my ICS Splashed using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nevermind me, didn't realize I wasn't in my subscribed forums list. Sorry.
Sent from my ICS Splashed using xda premium

removed becasue CPU not score comparison

cpu speed isnt everything. after a certain cpu speed, benchmarks will start getting lower/worse. performance overall will become worse if the cpu speed is set to high. personally, my phones sweetspot is between 1.44 and 1.54ghz. above that, performance starts to drop.

simms22 said:
its true, cpu speed isnt everything. after a certain cpu speed, benchmarks will start getting lower/worse. performance overall will become worse if the cpu speed is set to high. personally, my phones sweetspot is between 1.44 and 1.54ghz. above that, performance starts to drop.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you lowering your FSB to achieve higher speeds? dont see overall system slowdown unless you are down clocking your FSB to achieve higher CPU speeds? i mean his CPU is allot higher than mine
IDK im more familiar with desktop CPU not mobile think i might get what you're saying maybe an overheat issue and downclcok for protection..idk

demo23019 said:
removed becasue CPU not score comparison
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree.
And if your phone is getter hot. I'm very sure it is. Then you could be damaging it and that could greatly decrease the life spand of your internal components
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using XDA App. Developer of brickROM, and OP of XDA Thread of The Year 2011.

very funny... tried to OC up to 1540Mhz... the phone start to vibrate (like a female friend) and freezed.... now rebooted... never play again with so high OC