Will rsd lite 5.0 work to flash droid x - Droid X General

I've haven't heard of 5.0 till today. 4.9 works fine so I don't get why they make another version

rsdlite is not just for our phone.
i have seen people say that 5.0 works fine with the droid x.
i'm sticking with 4.8. i never have a problem with it.

I've been on 4.7 and I have never had a problem with it

Oh ok thanks I read that 5.0 supports flashing for the atrix. Thanks for the help

RSDLite 5
I used it today to SBF to 2.3.34 from 1st leaked GB and it worked fine for me.

I just upgraded to 4.9. Worked for me on windows 7 64 bit. Think I will use it a little longer.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App

juanzr1 said:
I've haven't heard of 5.0 till today. 4.9 works fine so I don't get why they make another version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see a lot of people that have to try several different versions of rsd until they find one that works. So, if 4.9 works then there is no reason to upgrade.
Sent from my DROID X in Western Illinois

RSD Lite 5.0 wors fine
RSD Lite 5.0 came out as a requirement for the Atrix 4G firmware, but it works fine with all the other Moto Droids and is the recommended one to avoid ficticious and annoying issues. Starting with version 4.9 they added an option to not delete the temp files created during the flash on exit. This is invaluable if you do lots of phones or are going to want to reflash your phone several times. Wastes a little hard drive space, but saves a lot of time!

Related

Adobe Flash 10.1 working on my DI

I jus installed flash on my ROOTED Droid Incredible and it works nicely a little slow but hell its flash with out Froyo
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
There have been other posts like this that turned out not to be true.
I doubt this one as well.
I thought I had it, too, but it turns out that it's just the default Flash Lite that ships with the phone.
aaronjb said:
I thought I had it, too, but it turns out that it's just the default Flash Lite that ships with the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, this is the real deal, although with sites like Hulu blocking mobile devices from streaming ATM, its range is limited. This ADOBE Flash 10.1, ported from Fr2.2.
PS, ROOT not required -- this simply plugs-into to Webkit browser where flashLite does, but that requires no intervention from the user either, which is very nice IMHO.
no, it's not. the only thing this does is makes it appear as if you have flash 10 to websites instead of flash lite. so it will seem like some sites work that didn't before, but it's still using the flash lite that's already on the phone.
seanhassars said:
no, it's not. the only thing this does is makes it appear as if you have flash 10 to websites instead of flash lite. so it will seem like some sites work that didn't before, but it's still using the flash lite that's already on the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why are you so sure? That apk installed and used once is 12mb, whereas the HTC Flash Lite plugin weighs in at . . . 52kb.
Because I was one of the first Incredible users when the guy who made it 2.1 compatible posted it. He already stated that the 2.1 webkit can't make use of the new flash beta without being completely rebuilt. He was/is working on getting that done, but for now it doesn't do anything but make it appear to websites that you have flash 10. so while it may seem like new sites are working, it's only because they detect flash 10. Your phone however, is still using flash lite to run the content.
seanhassars said:
Because I was one of the first Incredible users when the guy who made it 2.1 compatible posted it. He already stated that the 2.1 webkit can't make use of the new flash beta without being completely rebuilt. He was/is working on getting that done, but for now it doesn't do anything but make it appear to websites that you have flash 10. so while it may seem like new sites are working, it's only because they detect flash 10. Your phone however, is still using flash lite to run the content.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still find it hard to believe, especially since a friend of mine is using it successfully on an Eclair N1. In that case, it obviously could not cue the webkit just to spoof a plug-in that's not there. All of this would take a lot of time&effort to fake, from the icon, branding, Flash 10 build#, etc.
It doesn't do anything. It loads all the same pages that Flash Lite does. The browser doesn't understand how to use the Flash apk, and continues to use Flash Lite. You can even check this by going to whatismyflash.com before and after you install it.
when i go to whatismyflash.com , it says 10.1.123 ...
Before and after, correct. Nothing changed.
before its 10.1.123 and i didnt even download it. thats the stock flash verson ,so unless when you install it and it changes to 10.1 xxx then it will not work but who cares anyway, we about we are about to have NAND unlocked which means custom roms 2.2 so whats the big deal with this.
Mine says the same thing, but Im still running flash lite...
rynosaur said:
I still find it hard to believe, especially since a friend of mine is using it successfully on an Eclair N1. In that case, it obviously could not cue the webkit just to spoof a plug-in that's not there. All of this would take a lot of time&effort to fake, from the icon, branding, Flash 10 build#, etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't seem to understand what I'm saying. It's not fake. it's really the 2.2flash beta ported to install on 2.1 devices, but our phones don't actually know how to use it, other than acknowledging it's installed. so everything that worked before, works exactly the same. anything else that "works" after is simply because instead of being detected as using flash lite, the phone now thinks it has full flash, but it doesn't.
These threads are getting annoying! This must be like number seven, READ the thread you got this from before you post this again! The AUTHOR of that apk himself, auxluv, says it doesnt work! 2.1 does not have the apis for flash 10.1, PERIOD. Flash lite is what you are seeing. I cant believe this even needs to be explained to xda members..............
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=686736
LegionTHEFecalExcretion said:
2.1 does not have the apis for flash 10.1, PERIOD.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was immediately skeptical that this would work the first time I heard it for that reason.
There's no particular reason Adobe would be restricting Flash to 2.2 if it didn't depend on 2.2 APIs.
In any case, it's a moot point, since we'll have Froyo within a week most likely.
heavensblade23 said:
we'll have Froyo within a week most likely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's hope my friend.
Mthodmn101 said:
when i go to whatismyflash.com , it says 10.1.123 ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats what it will say before and after you install the flash 10.1 apk

WIFI crapping out upon connection

My WIFI network at home is visible and it showed full connectivity until I connected to it. It took a while but finally connected then showed no signal and disconnected, then showed full again, then tried to connect again, you get the idea. I have tested this with AOKP and Gummy with the same result. ALSO, I prefer to keep the network hidden but on setup, I hit "Save" it says "Setup has Stopped Working." I have seen this problem on AOKP and Gummy, the two ROMs I prefer at this time.
Root and ROM process I use:
- Started with stock Droid X (.621), SBF'd .604 through Linux (actually Windows the first time then had to call Verizon to fix. They were less than helpful until I got mad. I won't do that anymore)
- Zergrushv4 root through Windows
- Installed Droid 2 Bootstrapper
- Booted into ClockworkMod and formatted the various data's
- Installed ROM (AOKP build-39 is latest)
- Installed .604-to-.621-kernel-update (same result without doing this) <-- Currently running 15p radios if that matters.
- Installed Gapps
- Reset and performed initial setup
For sht's and gigs, I also tried installing the WIFI lib fix (I know it is for Blur) but that prevents AOKP from ever booting. It just sits on the rotating unicorn splash screen until I get bored and cut it off after 10 minutes. From there I have to go back to Linux and SBF .604. Ideas?
I was a noob as of last week but have learned a lot because of these forums. This is the first time I have had to post to get a question answered because there is so much good info out there. I appreciate the mostly accurate and educational information that is openly shared in this community.
EDIT: I tried SBF-ing .621 through RDS in Windows and then .604 in Linux. It is acting the same with Liberty (tried the wifi lib fix), and Cyanogen 7 and 9.
Does it connect to the network when on stock based roms or Gingerbread based roms?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
infazzdar said:
Does it connect to the network when on stock based roms or Gingerbread based roms?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It connects fine with the .621 and the .604 .sbf's
I just tried CM7 and that wouldn't even install (after a fresh .604 load)
I need to find another good Gingerbread to load and try that. Suggestions? Pref not blur
I got Vortex working with the WIFI. I would REALLY like to get away from Blur though. Suggestions?
lowriderdog37 said:
I got Vortex working with the WIFI. I would REALLY like to get away from Blur though. Suggestions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Vortex is about as close as you can get to a blurless stock based ROM.
Have you tried MIUI to test the WiFi?
There is a Gingerbread version and an Ice Cream Sandwich version.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
OK, crisis averted. I don't know 'why' but it is.
Before, when I was trying to get everything working the ROM Manager load of Clockwork wasn't working at all, I was stuck using the Droid 2 bootstrap. For whatever reason I tried using the ROM Manager again to load Clockwork and flashed AOKP to find that everything worked out of the box.
infazzdar said:
Vortex is about as close as you can get to a blurless stock based ROM.
Have you tried MIUI to test the WiFi?
There is a Gingerbread version and an Ice Cream Sandwich version.
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did try MIUI a while back but didn't care for the UI.
Stupid Noob question. Will it benefit me at all to install the .604 to .621 image update with 2nd init ROMs?

[Q] advice needed.apps keep crashing

not sure what happened but recently all my apps started acting up and nothing works.the only things i can kinda get working are
alarm app
facebook
keepsafe
chrome
these will work for a short amount of time but eventually all crash.and its happens a ton
i have a few other apps like
gbc ad
flashlight
google sky
snes droid
youtube
forum app
these do not work at all.these all do the same thing.all free base apps.so they launch.you see a add(thats normal.)than what is supposed to happen is app does whatever task it was designed for(reading forums.play gameboy games etc) but what happens is it keeps looping and starting back to launch..than add...than crash reboots self and starts again........
phone specs
razr maxx 912
ics 4.0.4
rooted 3.0.8 kernal
stock rom
now i have been looking into it and i think my best and may be only option is a factory restore?i know that jb just came out and i seen a few things over the internet about splicing ics root with jb where i go back to stock .211 and than do stuff and than ill have rooted jb...which is what id like...but im not sure if that will fix the app issue.so what do yall recomend
factory restore than straight to jb?
or try to keep root than splice jb so i can stay rooted on jb but like i said not sure if that would fix my app issue
upgrading to jb isnt a nessicity at this time it just would be nice to do.i plan on upgrading at some point.but i much rather have my phone working correctly
Bump
Sorry bud but you in the wrong section.
Razr M = XT907 or XT905
Is this section, M is not Maxx more like Mini
You have a Maxx which is like the Razr (No Maxx)
Razr and Razr Maxx = XT910 or XT912
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1360
If urs is an Razr HD or Razr HD Maxx
You have to go here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1861
Hope this helps sorry wasn't able to help you here but I think you will get more responses over the other correct section.
Germanese said:
Sorry bud but you in the wrong section.
Razr M = XT907 or XT905
Is this section, M is not Maxx more like Mini
You have a Maxx which is like the Razr (No Maxx)
Razr and Razr Maxx = XT910 or XT912
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1360
If urs is an Razr HD or Razr HD Maxx
You have to go here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1861
Hope this helps sorry wasn't able to help you here but I think you will get more responses over the other correct section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ah!makes more sense now thanks man ill remember that for next time
seeing how the thread is already here i thought i would update it just in case someone comes along and has similar issues
i flashed phone back to stock.factory reset.reformat sd....so totally wipe clean and start over.and just redid root and still on ics and everything is working great now.didnt take but an hour.should have done that in the first place
No problem man.
It sounded similar and familiar but as i don't own a XT910 i was of no use.
But it seems like ur phone is similar to ours in some ways.
Just another heads up,
If you running ICS and then Safetrap and instal JB onto Slot 1.
Depending on the ROM it maybe very unstable also. I don't know why but maybe has to do with Kernel or Core files.
So what ever ROM you try to share with the Stock Rom try to keep them in the same Core Land aka ICS with ICS and JB with JB.
Just a thought someone that is more informed about this matter, feel free to elaborate =)
But for now I stick to same OS version on all my Slots in SafeStrap.

Is there a cwm for blu studio 5.0 but not the s version

I'm been looking everywhere online to look for cwm for the blu studio 5.0 d530 I couldn't find nothing can someone help out
Sent from my SGH-T889 using Tapatalk
I'm on the same boat. What's the difference between Blu Studio 5.0 and 5s?
Sent from my BLU STUDIO 5.0 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Blaggah said:
I'm on the same boat. What's the difference between Blu Studio 5.0 and 5s?
Sent from my BLU STUDIO 5.0 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The biggest difference is that the 5.0 has a Dual Core CPU, whereas the 5.0S has a Quad Core CPU.
Far as I know the GPU is the same though, both have 1GB RAM/4GB ROM, can take up to 32GB SDHC cards, and are not compatible with any version of android newer than 4.1.2.
I managed to get CWM-R v6.0.3.2 (I believe, if memory serves right, but if not that's still a close guess) flashed on my BLU Studio 5.0S with AIO Flasher -- was actually a PITA for me, as I'm on Ubuntu 13.10 natively, so had to get a Winblow machine up and running just to do the AIO Flashing (wouldn't run correctly through Wine, Crossover, etc.). ZIPed up the exact versions I used of both AIO Flasher and CWM -- although I'm on a BLU Studio 5.0S, I imagine this should work for you as well.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/6e4ahqz719qn8vl/Blu Studio 5.0S.zip
Once you flash it (in case you're not aware), it seems Vol Up + Power to boot goes to Fastboot (green screen) -- this is where you need to be to flash with AIO. If you continue to hold the keys at Fastboot, you'll get to Recovery (red screen), and it'll then load up the recovery.img (be it the default stock one or CWM).
If either of you could be kind enough to Nandroid your stock rom before you flash a different one, I'd greatly appreciate a copy -- I had made one, but seem to have lost it amongst the piles of ROMs I've gone through for the device, as well as my copies I've edited (I'm a tinkerer/hacker Am actually trying to make my own ROM as well being everyone in my family has a 5.0S now, so that'd be nice so that I can just keep them all updated without worrying about them being on whatever they want to be on, especially since none of them know any Linux and therefore would likely do more harm than good XD).
The phone was too limted and seemed cripled to me due to it's lack of rom space. I returned it and got my money back thank goodness. I'm now in the process of trying to find a budget friendly phone that'll give me LTE on Tmobile. Anyone has any ideas or input? Please PM me and let me know.
CWM for Blu studio 5.0
I was stuck with the same problem girlfriend bricked her phone... I used sp flashtool to unbrick after several night digging though internet and forums to find stock rom..blu just emailed me back last week with the stock rom. 3 months later lol! no here is a CWM recovery I managed to make successfully with mtk droid tools..
https://plus.google.com/communities/117846429749085694805
Sent from my LIFE PLAY using XDA Free mobile app
I wish i still had the phone, it's funny because the development for it was just on the rise when i bought it back in Feb. Since then, i've moved on to other devices, which one of them happens to be the moto g lte. Can't wait for lollipop
Hello I bricked my phone too can you share the rom please? I have been looking for it for ages...please help me out
icearrow said:
Hello I bricked my phone too can you share the rom please? I have been looking for it for ages...please help me out
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/studio-5/help/help-finding-pure-stock-rom-blu-studio-t3003106
Model?
terrym3 said:
I was stuck with the same problem girlfriend bricked her phone... I used sp flashtool to unbrick after several night digging though internet and forums to find stock rom..blu just emailed me back last week with the stock rom. 3 months later lol! no here is a CWM recovery I managed to make successfully with mtk droid tools..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Will this work on 5.0 LTE Y530?
Thanks

[GUIDE][addison] SETUP Moto z play XT1635-02 : from stock 6.0 to custom ROM.

I have the habit of always asking on a new device no matter how much I think I know!
I have an xt1635-02 (I am US ATT Prepaid)(nano SIM) supposedly here tomorrow so I've been reading tons here.
However, it seems that a lot of the threads are aimed at rooting stock, which I never do.
As a rule, it's trivial:
[!] In this case it seems best to OTA update stock to 7.1.1 if it isn't already. I believe bootloader must be 7.x.x for doing custom Oreo ROMs . Since mine was 6.0 it took about 8 updates OTA and maybe 2 hours(wifi) .
[!]I go to moto site and do the unlock bootloader dance (already carrier unlocked supposedly).
https://motorola-global-portal.custhelp.com/app/standalone/bootloader/unlock-your-device-a
[!]Then flash twrp-3.2.1-0-addison.img (Alberto97) using fastboot on my PC. (Ubuntu 17.10 dev 18.04 with adb and fastboot)(dual boot win7)
I do this twice in a row as I have experienced it not working the first time (dead android LOL).(OCD much??? )
https://forum.xda-developers.com/mo...recovery-unofficial-twrp-moto-z-play-t3495629
- - -
[!] -->then flash Alberto's verity patch mentioned at the top of his TWRP thread
https://forum.xda-developers.com/mo...recovery-unofficial-twrp-moto-z-play-t3495629
This modifies stock. Else your backups of stock won't boot. Learned this the hard way!
- - -
[!]Then use TWRP to backup (default settings) stock a couple of times and put copies of both on PC (via USB on stock).(or if for some reason my USB-C doesn't work, via wifi to my router using filezilla FTP and phone app: "wifi file transfer" by "DNL Media UG"(needs permission storage=on..) - I had to redo this twice - redo this twice - kept dropping back to stock recovery.
[!]Then flash the boot logo using fastboot on PC - I usually use TWRP for this but these that I found here are not set up to be TWRP flash compat so will just remove bin from zip and flash using PC. I think I have about 4 possibilities that I found on these threads. Nice! Easy.
[!]Then boot to TWRP and flash Alberto97's AOSP 8.1 arm64 ROM. Why that ROM you may ask. Been using mainly that Alberto97 ROM on my Moto G3 (32bit version of course), and love it. There's plenty of time to try all the others!!!
I usually consider 2 root options; SuperSU 2.82-SR5, or majisk 1520. (for future readers, these are the latest at this time.)(besides I'm very used to them.)
With SuperSU I have had no probs wiping all 4(Dalvik/ART, system, data, cache), flash ROM, flash 8.1 gapps, flash SUperSU, and boot to install.
With majisk I have sometimes had troubles during install if I flash majisk in the first batch so I tend to wipe all 4, flash ROM and gapps, and boot to install. Then when I finally hit desktop, boot back to TWRP and flash 1520 and reboot.
I need root to use TBPro - no restoring on first time with this 64bit ROM- got to do it the hard way!
SO I believe that's it, but if anyone sees a flaw or problem in there, I would appreciate your help.
Thanks!!!
yep look right, i would have added backup EFS and Modem partitions, if you want to be completely safe.
For now, open gapps 8.1 are only unofficial, i would feel a bit unsecure to use that, but it's only me.
fablebreton said:
yep look right, i would have added backup EFS and Modem partitions, if you want to be completely safe.
For now, open gapps 8.1 are only unofficial, i would feel a bit unsecure to use that, but it's only me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Merci! Many thanks for looking in!!!
Yes, forgot to add that - did much xda search on the efs thing and best I found seemed to be a twrp-3.1.1-0-EFS-addison.img which I may very well flash first and do that since no other TWRP that I looked at offers backup efs. Official and squid2 derived (G3) don't. I assume Alberto's doesn't. Seems like I did it very manually on the G3. If you have it it's a pretty good guarantee that you'll never need it! (Murphy axiom)
As to unofficial gapps, I've been testing about 5 different 8.1 ROMs on the Moto G3 over the past couple months and if the gapps aren't built in to the ROM(some pixelexperience roms), all you can get is an unofficial gapps, or do a minor simple hack to an 8.0 so it will accept it. Usually devs will include it. Bless Alberto97 for not including it so I can select my own!!! But I've had no prob with gapps. Open gapps project has 8.0, but of course they won't work on a true 8.1 unless minor hack. I was planning on using open_gapps-arm64-8.1-aroma-20180109-UNOFFICIAL.zip (from https://cloud.kenzoroms.club/?dir=opengapps) unless you have a better idea. I wanted to grab camera from aroma(somebody's idea), but I also have about 5 other cameras and gcams waiting on the Sdcard that I want to test, simply because there seemed to be disagreement on what works on Alberto's new 8.1 build, so wanted to be able to report.
Thanks again!
backup efs / adb way : https://www.reddit.com/r/oneplus/comments/2zq0ff/friendly_reminder_back_up_your_efs_partition_if/
fablebreton said:
backup efs / adb way : https://www.reddit.com/r/oneplus/comments/2zq0ff/friendly_reminder_back_up_your_efs_partition_if/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for great link! yeah I think I used adb as well as an app last time. I'll add recovery this time so that's 3 backups on internal storage (and copied to PC) should be enough! (yes dear readers I am serious about this - 3 times! They are so tiny! And that pretty much guarantees I'll never need it, but if I do, it's childs play to get it back.)
Thanks!!!
If you're wondering about the delay, they sent me a -01 (Droid)(Murphy's law), so they paid for a UPS next day air label back to them(mailed at 4PM) - don't know if I'll get this going before Sat! Oh well!!! Never take these things too seriously!!! Gotta be costing them a chunk! I did briefly turn it on and stuck the SIM in it and it did show LTE on my ATT, but there's a few bands missing that are on the -02, so will wait. Pretty display, though!!! Really looking forward to it!!!
KrisM22 said:
If you're wondering about the delay, they sent me a -01 (Droid)(Murphy's law), so they paid for a UPS next day air label back to them(mailed at 4PM) - don't know if I'll get this going before Sat! Oh well!!! Never take these things too seriously!!! Gotta be costing them a chunk! I did briefly turn it on and stuck the SIM in it and it did show LTE on my ATT, but there's a few bands missing that are on the -02, so will wait. Pretty display, though!!! Really looking forward to it!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good plan on sending it back. You would have been SOL trying to root the -01
dandrumheller said:
Good plan on sending it back. You would have been SOL trying to root the -01
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! I learned about 5 or 6 phones ago NOT to re-invent the wheel!!!
KrisM22 said:
Yes! I learned about 5 or 6 phones ago NOT to re-invent the wheel!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, refund for that and order another from somebody else! Next week...!
The only thing is no moto mods on non stock (any thing past 7.1.1 or aosp) roms
punkerEVO said:
The only thing is no moto mods on non stock (any thing past 7.1.1 or aosp) roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes. stock 8.x is a no-no. This one that is coming is 6.0.1 So I will let it ota update to 7.1.1 after giving it a thorough check-out, then try unlocking it, etc. Sound right? I have no interest in any of the hardware-type addons, just the plain phone 3/32 octacore etc. Why this one? - I love the reception (radio) strength of Motos, plus a ton of other things. I stick with them. Plus it's all Albeto97's fault for deving on AOSP 8.1
Lol Alberto97's roms are buttery smooth!
punkerEVO said:
Lol Alberto97's roms are buttery smooth!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think they are. He recently came out with an 8.1 AOSP version for the Moto G3 and I love it. I test others, but that's my daily driver. Sure not perfect, but quite good enough for me!!! So I figure when I get it (Tues?) that's what I'll put on it. There's always plenty of time to test others!
Okay, since I am waiting for phone (Tues) , obviously I am worried about "what-if"s and so researching on what to do, "if".
I succeeded in finding a nice zip for 7.1.1 with the Nov security patch
https://firmware.center/firmware/Motorola/Moto Z Play/Stock/
(I am US)(there are many others at that nice site!!!)
That took a lot of time.
Then I needed to be sure that I could get RSD lite to run, and tried and tried to no avail to get it to recognize my phone (even on my laptop) (I was testing with an old Moto G3 stock zip and my G3 phone) before some post gave me a version number much higher than at the RSD site. google gave me:
http://rsdlite.en.lo4d.com/
version 6.2.4, which worked perfectly.
I really need to write a short guide on this stuff - feels like I'm re-inventing the wheel, even though many folks have written much before I came along!
The reason for the above two is that for a while the last few days I kept running into folks who had taken 7 OTA and wound up with a bricked phone. So, yes, I just did a search for "brick" on xda in moto z play and will start reading them! LOL
Quick EDIT: I think I am wrong in that brick assumption - the first 3 I looked at involved encryption and 2 downgrades to MM (which is a no-no). I will read further.
edit2 - nevermind - most are downgrading to MM. Wish folks would just ask before doing that. That is a no-no of most (all?) phones. -
Hi,
Please share your camera result using Alberto97's roms. I some ROM but i dont like camera result, i think stock ROM still better in camera.
Thank You
wakhidnusa said:
Hi,
Please share your camera result using Alberto97's roms. I some ROM but i dont like camera result, i think stock ROM still better in camera.
Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YES! Will do. I have about 5 cameras that I want to try though I will stop at the first one that works. Phone should be here today.
wakhidnusa said:
Hi,
Please share your camera result using Alberto97's roms. I some ROM but i dont like camera result, i think stock ROM still better in camera.
Thank You
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no problem with various cameras getting good image, but sometimes on still first pic doesn't save. ( tried camera MX and Professional camera hd. I'm sure lots work about the same.)
Forgot to flash Alberto's verity patch right after flashing TWRP. So I had to RSD lite 7.1.1 Nov 1 and start over - no big deal! OP corrected.
Hello Kris,
I would like to ask for a link where I can download a working RSD so I can unlocked my bootloader.
Thanks
jeprox said:
Hello Kris,
I would like to ask for a link where I can download a working RSD so I can unlocked my bootloader.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
link to 6.2.4 is in the first post of
https://forum.xda-developers.com/moto-z-play/how-to/guide-rsd-lite-mini-guide-t3740641#post75334194

Categories

Resources