Thought some of you might, or might not, like to read this:
http://www.slashgear.com/sprint-tea...n-as-2013-in-clearwire-negotiations-03137666/
elegantai said:
Thought some of you might, or might not, like to read this:
http://www.slashgear.com/sprint-tea...n-as-2013-in-clearwire-negotiations-03137666/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can someone explain what would happen if they do decide to go with LTE? Would that mean that places without 4g currently at the time of contract will have to wait now for LTE 4g network to be set up. Currently, I am in Michigan with no 4g and it sucks because I have had my Evo since last year waiting for 4g. Now all of a sudden Verizon and Tmobile have 4g in my city. WTF!!!
bsmoove386 said:
Can someone explain what would happen if they do decide to go with LTE? Would that mean that places without 4g currently at the time of contract will have to wait now for LTE 4g network to be set up. Currently, I am in Michigan with no 4g and it sucks because I have had my Evo since last year waiting for 4g. Now all of a sudden Verizon and Tmobile have 4g in my city. WTF!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If it were to happen, which I still doubt (sprint has too much invested in wimax), it would take at least a few years. And during that time there would be a switchover from wimax phones to lte, so people probably wouldnt be affected too much.
bsmoove386 said:
Can someone explain what would happen if they do decide to go with LTE? Would that mean that places without 4g currently at the time of contract will have to wait now for LTE 4g network to be set up. Currently, I am in Michigan with no 4g and it sucks because I have had my Evo since last year waiting for 4g. Now all of a sudden Verizon and Tmobile have 4g in my city. WTF!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, Verizon doesn't have to deal with Clearwire, which is Sprint's WiMax provider. They are the reason that WiMax hasn't spread as much as it should. And TMobile's "4G" isn't even 4G, its just a beefed up 3G network. I know that Sprint's 4G towers can be "converted" into LTE towers by just a simple firmware update, but I am pretty sure the hardware in the phones that support WiMax can't be changed. I may be wrong though. I believe that's why Sprint is now releasing smartphones without 4G support, because of the uncertainty of their deal with Clearwire. Again, this is all just what I think, but honestly, I'd rather have TMobile's "4G" than have to deal with LTE. I really REALLY do not want to own an LTE device. I really hope that Clearwire can fix itself and start deploying more towers, because then we won't have to deal with LTE. But we'll see what happens.
From what I have read, once Sprint's infrastructure clean up happens they will have 800 mHz spectrum leftover from the iDen network. This could go to LTE.
Tuffgong4 said:
From what I have read, once Sprint's infrastructure clean up happens they will have 800 mHz spectrum leftover from the iDen network. This could go to LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Didn't the DoD buy the iDen network a while back? I thought they were supposed take over it after Sprint phased it out.
Tuffgong4 said:
From what I have read, once Sprint's infrastructure clean up happens they will have 800 mHz spectrum leftover from the iDen network. This could go to LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's a no go at 800mhz for Sprint. The reason is because they only have 14mhz of spectrum there. LTE needs 20mhz of spectrum (I think there's something with TD-LTE that can get by on 15mhz, but they're still short there).
From what I've read, 800 mhz will go CDMA with PTT. If they wanted, they could use 10mhz of it for LTE, but would need to go to 1900mhz for any additional spectrum they would need. Because of this, it would make more sense to move their current CDMA service to 800mhz and install LTE at 1900mhz.
Related
Just curious if anyone is using the MT4G on AT&T and how well that's working? I know we can unlock it for use with any carrier but wanted some feedback before I spend the money to get my gf (now using iphone 3gs) an MT4G to use on AT&T.
I already know that 4G won't work. I got her a Captivate for Christmas but she really likes Sense and AT&T's phones are so locked down it's stupid. Can't use custom ringtones, can't sideload apps, etc.
Can anyone help out?
So I'm doing some research and it looks like there's minial wcdma overlap which means spotty 3g coverage? Is that right? I really don't know how to interpret what I'm seeing though so I would be really appreciative for the input of someone more informed than I.
LINKY
CAPTIVATE
GSM 850
GSM 900
GSM 1800
GSM 1900
WCDMA 850
WCDMA 1900
WCDMA 2100
MYTOUCH 4G
GSM 850
GSM 900
GSM 1800
GSM 1900
WCDMA 1700
WCDMA 2100
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Courtesy of PhoneScoop.com
i am using my MT4G on att and its preety good reception wise. I got 15 dollar unlimited data plan. Bec this is tmobil made hardware so i only get edge.
Why not just grab her an att nexus one and flash sense into it? Evil D's ports are really good!
Phateless said:
I already know that 4G won't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
3G won't work either. My question is why on earth would you want to take a MT4G over to the [IMO] worst network of all time?
Only bands 1& 4 right?
Although the captivate supports 2100, at&t only operates 850 & 1900 in the us. Some phones have 2100 for global roaming because that's what most others use.
While at&t does have a larger footprint, I just paid them $180 to get out of my contract and I'm much happier with tmobile. Texts actually send and web pages actually load.
Sent from my HTC Glacier using XDA App
It works just fine, just slower, obviously.
And yes, it is 3G.
Let me be super clear about this... 3G WILL NOT WORK on AT&T. The MT4G just doesn't have the right radio. However, the Vibrant (surprisingly) does have the 850 band on its 3G radio, and does sort of work for AT&T.
If you want an Android phone on AT&T, I recommend buying something unlocked from Canada. Rogers and Bell both share AT&T's 3G bands (850 & 1900), and have a better selection than AT&T itself.
Really great comments here. She's got a year left on her contract, that's why. She's gonna find out her termination fee tomorrow cuz she loves my mt4g, lol.
I always knew that an N1 is definitely her best bet but can't find one used and have an mt4g in the works for $260.
We're talking slightly different things here as well. HSPDA on ATT won't work.
However, "EDGE" describes a family of service classes, not a single speed. Depending on your location and the service speeds there, EDGE may in fact be qualified to be called 3G according to the ITU (the international body that certifies this nomenclature).
As the radio in this phone most certainly does support EDGE, whether or not you can get 3G speeds on AT&T will depend on your location. For most of us this will still be a "no," but if the OP is in one of the special markets (LA, NYC, ATL) you can see it. Since OP is in Oakland, I figured he might get lucky.
I swap cards a bit on mine (one SIMM or work, and one for personal use) and have been in areas where the EDGE network was nearly as fast as the supposed 4G on the other card.
I should probably start using the that bandwith meter app and record my results. It could be interesting.
ReverendJasen said:
We're talking slightly different things here as well. HSPDA on ATT won't work.
However, "EDGE" describes a family of service classes, not a single speed. Depending on your location and the service speeds there, EDGE may in fact be qualified to be called 3G according to the ITU (the international body that certifies this nomenclature)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
EDGE is not generally considered a 3G technology, although it is a significant improvement over GPRS, and it offers speeds approaching true 3G speeds.
Calling EDGE "3G" is somewhat like T-Mobile calling HSPA+ "4G"; it's playing a little fast and loose with the definitions. I do agree that in ideal circumstances, EDGE speeds can be pretty good, but it really falters when it comes to streaming media or any other data-intensive task.
Please post questions in Q&A section.
Anyone know if Atrix 4g supports LTE as well? or Only HSPA+?
It would be a waste of money if the phone didn't support LTE and we have to get a new phone later this year to for LTE.
No LTE. It'll be a year at least until there's any solid LTE coverage so I'm not worried about it.
So...it's probably safe to say that everyone in this forum knows about the 7 year roaming deal that AT&T has signed with T-Mobile. Does anyone have any ideas on when that will happen? And the big question...will the iPhone technically be able to be used on 3G with T-Mobile? Yes, it would only work while roaming, but would it not work for some reason? A T-Mobile rep brought up the question and I thought it was a good question. I'd like it to bring in revenues for T-Mobile...but I love my fast speed I get with T-Mobile, and 10 gazillion iPhones would do nothing but harm for that.
**Updated** Please, if anyone can check their Android phone (via *#0011#) and post if it says band II along with the city you're in at the time that it shows it! We need to find out which cities have been refarmed to 1900MHz for 3G/4G.
So, go forth and discuss
List of pentaband UMTS devices:
T-Mobile Galaxy S II (T989)
Nokia N8 and N9
T-Mobile Vibrant (T959)
Galaxy Nexus (HSPA version)
...expanding
It'd be 2G roaming. The carriers' 3G networks are incompatible. While AT&T devices will work on T-Mobile's EDGE data, it shouldn't be common enough to impact our speeds much. The only way this could possibly happen is if both AT&T and T-Mobile started selling exclusively pentaband HSPA devices. Which would be awesome on so many levels.
synaesthetic said:
It'd be 2G roaming. The carriers' 3G networks are incompatible. While AT&T devices will work on T-Mobile's EDGE data, it shouldn't be common enough to impact our speeds much. The only way this could possibly happen is if both AT&T and T-Mobile started selling exclusively pentaband HSPA devices. Which would be awesome on so many levels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's 3G, check Engadget. I'm sure it's 2G as well. And I know of at least one phone that is pentaband UMTS...mine, the Galaxy S II lol
Trevnerdio said:
It's 3G, check Engadget. I'm sure it's 2G as well. And I know of at least one phone that is pentaband UMTS...mine, the Galaxy S II lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OP specifically asked about the iPhone, which is unable to get 3G on T-Mobile's network. So if an AT&T iPhone were to roam on T-Mobile's network, it would not get 3G speeds.
Edit: The Galaxy Nexus is also pentaband, and so are the Nokia N8 and N9. The original Vibrant is also pentaband.
The Skyrocket is also pentaband, so I'll be able to mooch off of 42.2mbps HSPA+ when I get an LTE throttle. LOL
Longcat14 said:
The Skyrocket is also pentaband, so I'll be able to mooch off of 42.2mbps HSPA+ when I get an LTE throttle. LOL
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but is it DC-HSPA+? If not, no 42.2Mbps for you!
synaesthetic said:
Yes, but is it DC-HSPA+? If not, no 42.2Mbps for you!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Skyrocket has a more advanced modem.
Well, it's really just the T-Mobile radio with LTE slapped into it, so yes, I do have 42.2Mbps.
has anyone tried the AT&T skyrocket on T-Mobile? Does it support HSPA+ AWS? AFAIK, only LTE works on AWS for this phone.
Thanks everyone for the phones. I've been busy and couldn't really update the thread. The current gen iPhone doesn't have AWS, yes, but since the roaming agreement is UMTS, wouldn't that allow T-Mobile devices that have the ability to roam on 850/1900 bands the ability to connect to their 3G network? So jailbroken iPhones that are activated on T-Mobile could roam over to AT&T 3G, it's just that it isn't likely that AT&T would allow it.
Am I right in my assumption?
I don't think AT&T would allow it, honestly.
Edit: According to GSMArena, the Skyrocket doesn't support 1700/2100 HSPA+. Only 1700/2100 LTE.
synaesthetic said:
I don't think AT&T would allow it, honestly.
Edit: According to GSMArena, the Skyrocket doesn't support 1700/2100 HSPA+. Only 1700/2100 LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the heads up. And when the others in the thread said the Galaxy Nexus, they were referring to the European version, correct?
Edit: it's 700/1700 for LTE and then the normal AT&T bands for WCDMA
synaesthetic said:
I don't think AT&T would allow it, honestly.
Edit: According to GSMArena, the Skyrocket doesn't support 1700/2100 HSPA+. Only 1700/2100 LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Over at the T-Mobile SGS II forums, when I flashed a T-Mo SGS II modem, I gained access to 1700/2100.
All I need is a T-Mo SIM card to test if it'll connect to 3G, which I don't have.
I have the GSM Galaxy Nexus so naturally I am quite excited for this.
But the question remains... Does anyone have the slightest idea when this service will go live???
Lucasmpinelli said:
I have the GSM Galaxy Nexus so naturally I am quite excited for this.
But the question remains... Does anyone have the slightest idea when this service will go live???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not as simple as touching AT&T, and roaming.
You have to be in an area where there is COMPLETELY no T-Mobile signal, it can't even pick it up when you scan for it. Then, and ONLY then, will the SIM allow you to verify it on AT&T's network for roaming.
With AT&T's larger coverage footprint, you T-Mo users should have some nice coverage while traveling.
Longcat14 said:
Over at the T-Mobile SGS II forums, when I flashed a T-Mo SGS II modem, I gained access to 1700/2100.
All I need is a T-Mo SIM card to test if it'll connect to 3G, which I don't have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can do that?
I2IEAILiiTY said:
You can do that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Skyrocket has the same modem as the T-Mo SGS II, except with LTE attached.
It's a different modem number, but other then LTE, it's all the same.
So yes, I can.
Longcat14 said:
It's not as simple as touching AT&T, and roaming.
You have to be in an area where there is COMPLETELY no T-Mobile signal, it can't even pick it up when you scan for it. Then, and ONLY then, will the SIM allow you to verify it on AT&T's network for roaming.
With AT&T's larger coverage footprint, you T-Mo users should have some nice coverage while traveling.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where do you get your information? I thought that's how it has always worked prior to this new roaming agreement. I spoke to a T-mobile store rep (not the best source of information) and he told me that iPhones on west coast had 3G access.
Longcat14 said:
Skyrocket has the same modem as the T-Mo SGS II, except with LTE attached.
It's a different modem number, but other then LTE, it's all the same.
So yes, I can.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, so that's only on the skyrocket...
cephasara said:
Where do you get your information? I thought that's how it has always worked prior to this new roaming agreement. I spoke to a T-mobile store rep (not the best source of information) and he told me that iPhones on west coast had 3G access.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've heard that T-Mo is doing some spectrum refarming on the PCS band...in other words, 3G is starting to pop up in certain markets on the 1900MHz band
I know this has been rumored before, but here it is straight from the horse's mouth.
http://blog.t-mobile.com/2012/03/13/t-mobile-expands-4g-network-to-new-cities/
Snippet here:
We are also going to make more effective use of the spectrum we already have by refarming a portion of our 1900 MHz PCS spectrum to support HSPA+ services, which frees up additional AWS spectrum for LTE
If I am not mistaken that would also make our Galaxy Notes compatible as well! Which would make me very...
damm
that would be Great!
Tmo USA's 1900mhz band is for 2G. So all they are saying is that they will use some of their 2G spectrum to expand their HSPA+ (1700mhz) and LTE (700mhz) network.
Spartoi said:
Tmo USA's 1900mhz band is for 2G. So all they are saying is that they will use some of their 2G spectrum to expand their HSPA+ (1700mhz) and LTE (700mhz) network.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Taken from the article...
"Will refarming make your network compatible with the iPhone? And will you stop offering 2G services? A nice side benefit of the refarming effort is that our 4G network will be compatible with a broader range of devices, including the iPhone."
That would be a great way for TMo to steal some customers from AT&T and add to their user base when the AT&T users bring their own device (BYOD), since their plan prices are better.
adelmundo said:
That would be a great way for TMo to steal some customers from AT&T and add to their user base when the AT&T users bring their own device (BYOD), since their plan prices are better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yah, and at least in my area T-Mobile has better reception & faster data speeds. So, I will jump over as soon as this becomes a reality. *fingers crossed*
This alone will bring Tmobile to 3rd. If they also market themselves as a carrier that isn't afraid of being a dumb pipe, they will foster despite not having any hero phones of their own.
Here's a new post over on the T-Mobile forums.
http://support.t-mobile.com/thread/21487?start=30&tstart=0
I know T- mobile is rolling out their 1900mhz band across the US this year, and in the last few days I've noticed much better signal strength and I just ran a speedtest and was very impressed by the results. I've had better upload results but this is by far the fastest upload speeds I've seen on the mobile data network.
Showed the 'H' icon next to the signal bars, I wonder if our phones will ever show 'LTE'?
I know I'm getting 4G but never says 4G. Always just 'H'.
Anyway, here's a screen if the results:
http://db.tt/V0IaSyjO
Close to 20Mbps!
Haha, I, as well as many others in this forum have been getting 20-25 off HSPA 42. There is an internal setting in the Nexus 4 to enable LTE, and if you connect to LTE, it shows the appropriate symbol, too. Currently, the flavor of LTE that the Nexus likes is only available in Canada (and maybe other places, but not US yet as far as I know), but it's starting to get deployed in the US via T-Mobile. It started off in Las Vegas and Kansas, or will be starting off, so if you're not in either of those places, you probably don't have LTE.
AW: Are these speeds LTE level?
Look under Settings-About the phone- status, there you can see the type of connection
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Its always gonna say h. There are ROMS that replace the icon with a 4g icon but most of them leave them as is. That doesnt mean your not getting 4g , plus those speeds look very good to me
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Those speeds are excellent for 4g, but with lte you're going to see upload speeds as fast as your download speeds.
yahoowizard said:
Haha, I, as well as many others in this forum have been getting 20-25 off HSPA 42. There is an internal setting in the Nexus 4 to enable LTE, and if you connect to LTE, it shows the appropriate symbol, too. Currently, the flavor of LTE that the Nexus likes is only available in Canada (and maybe other places, but not US yet as far as I know), but it's starting to get deployed in the US via T-Mobile. It started off in Las Vegas and Kansas, or will be starting off, so if you're not in either of those places, you probably don't have LTE.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All good to know.
I'm in Seattle regularly, which was one if the first places T-Mobile rolled out their 1900mhz LTE service, do how do I turn on this internal setting you mentioned?
Thanks.
Globespy said:
All good to know.
I'm in Seattle regularly, which was one if the first places T-Mobile rolled out their 1900mhz LTE service, do how do I turn on this internal setting you mentioned?
Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
T-Mobile isn't rolling out LTE on 1900mhz. That's just 3G.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
joshnichols189 said:
T-Mobile isn't rolling out LTE on 1900mhz. That's just 3G.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, I've received different information. I've spoken with level 3 tech support numerous times about the roll out of their 1900mhz band during 2013 across the US, and they confirmed that their version of LTE will use the 1900mhz frequency (which, incidentally is the most highly used global frequency for high speed data - I'm a British and Australian Citizen as well as US Citizen and use my phones worldwide). The 700mhz frequency is for Verizon LTE phones, so T-Mobiles decision to run 1900mhz will mean that AT&T customers can move to T-Mobile with their existing phones
Their current 3G and 4G runs on 1700mhz - of course your phone will only get 4G if it's hardware capable of 4G.
Here's an article that will explain it all for you:
http://newsroom.t-mobile.com/articles/4GNetworkEvolutionVendorsSelected
Uhh
Globespy said:
Interesting, I've received different information. I've spoken with level 3 tech support numerous times about the roll out of their 1900mhz band during 2013 across the US, and they confirmed that their version of LTE will use the 1900mhz frequency (which, incidentally is the most highly used global frequency for high speed data - I'm a British and Australian Citizen as well as US Citizen and use my phones worldwide). The 700mhz frequency is for Verizon LTE phones, so T-Mobiles decision to run 1900mhz will mean that AT&T customers can move to T-Mobile with their existing phones
Their current 3G and 4G runs on 1700mhz - of course your phone will only get 4G if it's hardware capable of 4G.
Here's an article that will explain it all for you:
http://newsroom.t-mobile.com/articles/4GNetworkEvolutionVendorsSelected
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't need an article.. T-Mobile is deploying band 4 LTE over 1700/2100mhz frequencies. The 1900mhz band is being refarmed to HSPAP which will allow AT&T users to use HSPAP on T-Mobile. This also allows T-Mobile to stop using 1700/2100 for HSPAP since they will be using it for LTE.
If you are calling T-Mobile and expecting their "level 3 tech support" to know anything, you're doing it wrong.
Also the article you posted even proves my point.. "Refarming 1900mhz for '4G HSPAP'"
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
joshnichols189 said:
Uhh
I don't need an article.. T-Mobile is deploying band 4 LTE over 1700/2100mhz frequencies. The 1900mhz band is being refarmed to HSPAP which will allow AT&T users to use HSPAP on T-Mobile. This also allows T-Mobile to stop using 1700/2100 for HSPAP since they will be using it for LTE.
If you are calling T-Mobile and expecting their "level 3 tech support" to know anything, you're doing it wrong.
Also the article you posted even proves my point.. "Refarming 1900mhz for '4G HSPAP'"
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your clarification. Good to know that we will get LTE regardless as the phone supports all those bands.
And, yes their tech support had been I'll informed before.... I was hoping that since several different people had said the same thing that there was consistency... Seems consistently crap information. However, 1700mhz currently is 4G, so moving it to 1900mhz is to improve signal strength through buildings etc right?
I've since looked at comparisons between HSPA+ and LTE... seems that LTE has a significant edge uploading, not that great of a difference download (especially as download speeds are often limited by the site you visit, regardless of how fast your carrier speed).
I'm sure I'll be happy with HSPS+ as I rarely upload much more than photos I take on my phone camera, and current 4G is plenty sufficient as it is..