Database Users

Captivate to Atrix...Should I do it?

My sister will give me her upgrade if I give her my Captivate. I use Cog 4 currently and I am happy with the device except gps.
If anyone jumped from Captivate to Atrix, what are your thoughts.
I'm also debating on just waiting for GS2 for AT&T.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

I also have a Captivate running Cognition and I prefer the Atrix in every way.

MrTrunks said:
My sister will give me her upgrade if I give her my Captivate. I use Cog 4 currently and I am happy with the device except gps.
If anyone jumped from Captivate to Atrix, what are your thoughts.
I'm also debating on just waiting for GS2 for AT&T.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try the official froyo update, from what i have read the gps works.
if it doesn't and it's important to you then get the atrix.
otherwise keep your cappy and wait for the galaxy S 2 or something else

I'm in the same boat, and from what I've been reading in these forums, people don't seem all that incredibly happy with the Atrix. I'm planning on waiting for the Galaxy S 2 myself. I don't know if I can deal with a non-SAMOLED screen now that I've had one!

I have the Atrix and the Captivate. I am happier with my Captivate than with my Atrix. Although I do like the power the Atrix has but I prefer the media support for the Captivate and I prefer Amoleds to the Atrix's display. Download speeds are disappointing too, considering it's supposed to be 4g. The Captivate gets faster speedtest results. Atrix's Hd video playback for mkv files is really choppy and embarrasing for a dual core phone. My recommendation would be to hold out for the S2. Quadrant scores aren't that impressive considering a single core Nexus S is on par with the Atrix. Quadrant Score for Atrix is in the 2500s where as the Nexus S was in the low 2000s untouched. I'm trying to give the Atrix a fair trial, but for now it seems as though it will be returned. I'll be waiting for the S2 or the Infuse.

iamthekeng said:
I have the Atrix and the Captivate. I am happier with my Captivate than with my Atrix. Although I do like the power the Atrix has but I prefer the media support for the Captivate and I prefer Amoleds to the Atrix's display. Download speeds are disappointing too, considering it's supposed to be 4g. The Captivate gets faster speedtest results. Atrix's Hd video playback for mkv files is really choppy and embarrasing for a dual core phone. My recommendation would be to hold out for the S2. Quadrant scores aren't that impressive considering a single core Nexus S is on par with the Atrix. Quadrant Score for Atrix is in the 2500s where as the Nexus S was in the low 2000s untouched. I'm trying to give the Atrix a fair trial, but for now it seems as though it will be returned. I'll be waiting for the S2 or the Infuse.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im returning my atrix. Im running serendipity 5.11 on my cap and I noticed that motoblur is far slower than my cap, I use launcher pro also. I don't care about the screen (its a phone and its plenty crisp an image, I have a laptop and a desktop for quality.)
I didn't test the gps. I thought the camera over all wasn't as good as the cap, but thays probably a software issue not hardware. Though its disappointing that companies (samsung included) release these phone and advertise and price them as the next best thing while including hardware, I.e. camera sensor, That has been around for a while already and is subpar to some phone that are a year old already.
It obvioulsy performs tasks quicker than the captivate because of the dual core, but I don't see the benefits yet, I can wait.
I will wait until there are hacks if I really want it but for now the price att wants does not support the benefits. The real reason to get one is the dock and they've made that so expensive and trying to call it tethering using the dock when its all phone is dumb. I was told buy my friends at att tell me I can't keep my unlimited and add tethering either.(edit, clarify, I can't add tethering if I want to keep my unlimited plan, its one or the other)
Over all, im not impressed. But im sure it will get better with updates. Im gonna stick it out for a while with the cap and see what happens. I may give the new htc one a go first, its not faster than the cap, but its got a bigger screen and camera sensor so....
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

See the GPS thread. THE ATRIX GPS WORKS!
Cappy doesn't. Atrix does.
Yeah, it really is that simple. Cappy is a little slimmer and lighter and has a nice bright screen--but who cares if the GPS will never work? And after two or three bogus fixes were issued and announced...who wants to wait and see?
And for the first time in all these years...a phone I've bought HAS A MESSAGE LIGHT! I can't tell you how nice a litle perq that is. Cappy doesn't have it.
Now, if they'd only put in a hole for a tether cord, because I'm often in places where a phone really doesn't want to get dropped.
Cappy gone. Hello Moto.

I have had 3 Captivates since they were released, and now I have an Atrix and Nexus One. Guess what, the Atrix is the best of all those. The Captivate is simply a garbage device, no way around it. No LED flash, no front facing camera, no LED notification, garbage GPS, slower, comes with trash TouchWiz, etc.

Rred said:
See the GPS thread. THE ATRIX GPS WORKS!
Cappy doesn't. Atrix does.
Yeah, it really is that simple. Cappy is a little slimmer and lighter and has a nice bright screen--but who cares if the GPS will never work? And after two or three bogus fixes were issued and announced...who wants to wait and see?
Cappy gone. Hello Moto.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While I loved my Captivate, I must agree with you. Even with the best custom ROM for GPS (Paragon 6), GPS is hit or miss. Side by side, my wife's iPhone 4 and my Samsung Focus get a GPS lock much faster than the Captivate in difficult situations (indoors, cloudy day etc). I hope that the Atrix is better at this.
Another issue with the Captivate was battery life, which I hope the Atrix will be better at. Cheers.

MrTrunks said:
My sister will give me her upgrade if I give her my Captivate. I use Cog 4 currently and I am happy with the device except gps.
If anyone jumped from Captivate to Atrix, what are your thoughts.
I'm also debating on just waiting for GS2 for AT&T.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The gps with Cog 4 is so much better than it has ever been since the Captivate came out. It locks on pretty quick and it's pretty accurate on location as well. My gps never worked until now.

lost2030 said:
The gps with Cog 4 is so much better than it has ever been since the Captivate came out. It locks on pretty quick and it's pretty accurate on location as well. My gps never worked until now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
People say that every time, but yet it's still the same. It's a hardware issues plain and simple.

Squeak22 said:
People say that every time, but yet it's still the same. It's a hardware issues plain and simple.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep. Regardless of ROM, my GPS on every Captivate I have owned has been entirely broken. 10+ minutes in an open parking lot, no signal lock. Atrix locks in my car in 5 seconds.

I made the same change from the Captivate to Atrix. Overall I've had a good experience with the Atrix. My biggest complaint at this point is Moto Blur. It's just crap. IF you decide to get the Atrix just be prepared for the different screen. The Amoled screen is better than the screen on the Atrix. I do miss that a little bit. But then I dock it on the Lapdock and forget all about it

I got an atrix on day one on day two i boxed it back up am taking it back monday. After samoled i cold not take that screen. It was simply horrible to me. I am going to wait to see what samsung, htc, and apple bring out this summer.

AJerman said:
I'm in the same boat, and from what I've been reading in these forums, people don't seem all that incredibly happy with the Atrix. I'm planning on waiting for the Galaxy S 2 myself. I don't know if I can deal with a non-SAMOLED screen now that I've had one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm; have you compared the two side by side? The Atrix is a lot clearer and has a higher resolution.
Rooted/ROM Captivate (For Sale)
Rooted Atrix

I have switched as well and I love the phone. Very fast, great life, and better durability.
I'm going to be ordering a case in a few hours and getting the laptop dock in a few days.
Rooted/ROM Captivate (For Sale)
Rooted Atrix

Atrix is wonderful
Atrix is a wonderful experience, especially compared to the Captivate which was horrible, especially after loading in all of my apps the Captivate just froze with everything....the Atrix flies! Get Launcher Pro and forget Motoblur, it sucks.

I thought about it. I work for the Shack an get a pretty good discount on the atrix but I am simply in love with my captivate. Love the amoled. Love the huge selection of custom roms. The phone is extremely snappy running paragon. I am just 100% satisfied with the captivate.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App

hijack
What about someone coming from a uk dhd, nexus s.... then a telus dhd.... my current desire hd, having hspa.... is great IMO, battery life could be better, but I have an extra battery...
Oh well, it will be here in 10 days, I guess that will decide all... but it is going to have to be great.... to make me ditch my dhd running cm7!

I'm torn in this decision too. I currently have a Nexus One and a Captivate. I was really thinking of selling the Captivate and getting either the Inspire or the Atrix. I messed around with both for about an hour and can honestly say I was a little let down by the Atrix. I really want to like this phone but I personally think the screen compared to the Captivate is just plain dull. Yeah, it has a higher res screen and I can appreciate that. BUT, the colors on the SAMOLED have spoiled me. I don't know what to do. The performance with a live wallpaper on my friend's Atrix was, frankly, pretty dang lousy for a phone that everyone has been raving about in terms of its speed. With a regular wallpaper the phone is certainly faster but it still didn't just blow me away. Also, the plastic build materials left a sour taste. Again, I really want to like this phone. I guess I'll check it out again and maybe have a change of heart. Anyone else think the way I do as far as the screen?

Buying a Nexus S or Atrix today, need advice

I am trying to decide between the Nexus S and Atrix. I change phones every six months, so longevitivty isn't a big issue for me. I like running the newest software, and love messing around with Roms, so that is a big reason I am considering the Nexus S. My big hang up is battery life. I use my phone a good bit for voice calls, and I don't like living'next to the charger. How is the battery life on the Nexus S? The Atrix has a 1950mah battery which is huge.
BTW, I'm a Xoom user and love it.
Any advice is appreciated.

Well, if you like the xoom, you will like the atrix. Yes, the atrix is a superior device in almost every aspect when it comes to hardware however, many reviews that put the atrix against the nexus s have the atrix as the loser. Bottom line is the atrix is not yet optimized for android 2.2. Maybe gingerbread but we wont know that until it's released for the atrix. Personally, I think the nexus s has a way better look to it but that's just me. The camera on the nexus s does a better job and I beleive it's now 720p. Stock android 2.3 vs motoblur and most people will take stock android any day over motoblur. Most menu's are faster on the nexus s and again, it's more optimized on android right now. Now, with the atrix, you will get the sweet tegra games which do look amazing. Then theirs super AMOLED vs the QHD rez. I would take the super AMOLED any day as most would. Then their is t-mobile vs at&t. Yes, you can now buy the nexus s with at&t 3g on-line (Nergi Electronics) Just rambeling but my 2 cents. Hope this helps.

Hey just wanted to give you a little info about the nexus s. flat out IM IN LOVE lol this phone is amazing can't cry about really anything. but on this phone its got no sdcard slot we do get 14gb lol its supposed to be 16gb but I got over it haha. The battery is really good I loved it for the first 4 days then I started flashing rom's and of course you'll have to figure out which kernel fits your needs. like if you want to have your phone overclocked so fast it fly's out of your hands lol and sacrifice battery then that's you or you could underclock just enough and still get a overall great speedy rom. But I do miss one thing when I left my HTC evo was the sense but soon hopefully some great development will port it soon but I would hands down go for the nexus s. I have a friend that is a manager at Radioshack and I played with the atrix and wasn't feeling Motorola products to much its always trouble getting the hooked up. But the computer dock crap is cool but that's even more money and that's what I would only get it for but good luck on your choice my friend test both out and read reviews before purchaseing them to get a better example huhmm? Lol
PS: sorry for the big text hahaha
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk

Like the other poster reminded me I can't stand moto blur (personal preference) lol but that I would also take plain Jane before that again and the phone is just sweet get it hahahaha ;-)
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk

The best advice I can give is to YouTube both devices and figure out which one fits your needs. I honestly never tried the Atrix so I can't compare the two.
Definitely the selling point of the NS is software and its screen (at least in my opinion).
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App

OuncE718 said:
The best advice I can give is to YouTube both devices and figure out which one fits your needs. I honestly never tried the Atrix so I can't compare the two.
Definitely the selling point of the NS is software and its screen (at least in my opinion).
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And ability to unlock bootloader very easily.
It's as simple as this:
if you want to mod your phone: Nexus S
dont want to mod: atrix [however you'll have to deal with motoblur... although gingerblur doesnt seem that awful... but the locked bootloaders is something you'll have to deal with / kernel / recovery / etc / list of problems go on and on]
just check their dev section: http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=997

I talk on my nexus a lot... leave wifi on all day and gps too. Have 2 accounts syncing gmail and calendar. On top of all that I'm in an area where I constantly get weak signal and the battery life is pretty good.

Just the other day I did several phone calls, recorded two videos, uploaded them to YouTube then posted them to my fb page, used Maps, tons of txts, sent kik messages all day, use the internet all day. That was a 16hr 45min day on battery (and it wasn't dead when i threw it back on the charger.)
Hows that for good battery life

I know a few people who got Atrix's on launch day and they returned them within the first week. I bought the Nexus S for myself, my wife, and convinced my dad to get one as well. None of us have ever considered returning it.

Hands down the nexus s don't waste your time with that moto blurr bull****
the nexus s is faster looks better and will always get the first updates

I can tell you that atrix is a POS. I had it and it was just wonky feeling and slow as hell. I got the HTC Inspire the other day but just bought the Unlocked Nexus S that is now available for AT&T. Can't wait to use this puppy.

Holy ****. I am getting the nexus s than. Do you get this battery stock or with custom rom?
Risi2112 said:
Just the other day I did several phone calls, recorded two videos, uploaded them to YouTube then posted them to my fb page, used Maps, tons of txts, sent kik messages all day, use the internet all day. That was a 16hr 45min day on battery (and it wasn't dead when i threw it back on the charger.)
Hows that for good battery life
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my X10i using Tapatalk

I definitely agree with battery life. Nexus S has far superior battery life than any I've used. Personally I have not owned Atrix but I've played around with it at Best Buy so I can't speak its battery life but I can say that I found Atrix's UI to be quite sluggish. I can tell it's not optimized for Android. The Nexus S has very snappy UI, I can tell Google optimized this phone very well with the hardware. I do get 16+ hours with heavy internet and video usage and 20+ hours with normal daily usage. I'm very happy with this phone.

ashirian said:
I definitely agree with battery life. Nexus S has far superior battery life than any I've used. Personally I have not owned Atrix but I've played around with it at Best Buy so I can't speak its battery life but I can say that I found Atrix's UI to be quite sluggish. I can tell it's not optimized for Android. The Nexus S has very snappy UI, I can tell Google optimized this phone very well with the hardware. I do get 16+ hours with heavy internet and video usage and 20+ hours with normal daily usage. I'm very happy with this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has nothing to do with optimization. It's just simply because its a "Pure Google" experience. No bloat by the carrier or manufacturer.
For Atrix.. it does, 2.2 is not built towards MultiCPUs, and it doesn't help it has MOTOBLUR on top of it slowing it down. Not to mention AT&T is crippling Atrix's HSUPA (Upload)

zephiK said:
It has nothing to do with optimization. It's just simply because its a "Pure Google" experience. No bloat by the carrier or manufacturer.
For Atrix.. it does, 2.2 is not built towards MultiCPUs, and it doesn't help it has MOTOBLUR on top of it slowing it down. Not to mention AT&T is crippling Atrix's HSUPA (Upload)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I truly beleive that the atrix is not optimized. I think that when we see it optimized, we will see a really fast phone. We already know that tegra games run like butter on it and the tegra games are pretty intense. Overall, I think the nexus s has a WAY better design and is way sexier. Yes, the nexus s does pictures better than the atrix but then there is the no 720p thing on the NS which is a BIG bummer! Decisions decisions... Also, you can download an optimized version of Qik from the market that does video chat which is pretty nice as I use Qik with most of my friends. I know the t-mobile people can get the Qik with video off the market too. Not sure if this will work for at&t customers with the 850/1900 NS that was just released. Also, the atrix has pretty good battery life too. Especially after it's latest update.

Raspster said:
I truly beleive that the atrix is not optimized. I think that when we see it optimized, we will see a really fast phone. We already know that tegra games run like butter on it and the tegra games are pretty intense. Overall, I think the nexus s has a WAY better design and is way sexier. Yes, the nexus s does pictures better than the atrix but then there is the no 720p thing on the NS which is a BIG bummer! Decisions decisions... Also, you can download an optimized version of Qik from the market that does video chat which is pretty nice as I use Qik with most of my friends. I know the t-mobile people can get the Qik with video off the market too. Not sure if this will work for at&t customers with the 850/1900 NS that was just released. Also, the atrix has pretty good battery life too. Especially after it's latest update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agreed with you that Atrix its not optimized. It's not optimized because, Motorola can't optimize MultiCPUs unless they build scratch code from AOSP. Only Google is capable of doing this.
The Nexus S also have good battery life as well. I mean, I don't think battery life is justifiable for performance.
In my opinion, I believe that the Nexus S is the winner out of this simply because the customer has more freedom on what they want to do with their device. Freedom in terms of Custom ROMs, Custom Kernel, Recovery, and more. And a better reliable network, T-Mobile (varies between location).

zephiK said:
I agreed with you that Atrix its not optimized. It's not optimized because, Motorola can't optimize MultiCPUs unless they build scratch code from AOSP. Only Google is capable of doing this.
The Nexus S also have good battery life as well. I mean, I don't think battery life is justifiable for performance.
In my opinion, I believe that the Nexus S is the winner out of this simply because the customer has more freedom on what they want to do with their device. Freedom in terms of Custom ROMs, Custom Kernel, Recovery, and more. And a better reliable network, T-Mobile (varies between location).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohwell, there's always the Nexus 3! Which I'm sure Google will have multi-core's in it! I just ordered the Nexus S with the at&t 3G bands (locked into at&t) plus I get 30% off thru my job. I'll report back to you guys with my finding on the 850/1900 band NS which I'm sure I will be happy with.

Raspster said:
Ohwell, there's always the Nexus 3! Which I'm sure Google will have multi-core's in it! I just ordered the Nexus S with the at&t 3G bands (locked into at&t) plus I get 30% off thru my job. I'll report back to you guys with my finding on the 850/1900 band NS which I'm sure I will be happy with.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the code you have through your job to get that discount
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App

LoveisPeace2012 said:
What's the code you have through your job to get that discount
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao. I wish he would give up the code.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA Premium App

Posting such a thread in the Nexus S section, you're always going to get the Nexus S fanboys rubbishing the Atrix D). I personally have both phones, and I'm currently using my Moto Atrix.
Comments about Blur aside (yes its crap but!) you can replace the stock launcher with what ever you want (Its not valid reason not to buy the Atrix). Personally, I'm using the Gingerbread launcher made by Modaco and its bl00dy brilliant and certainly not sluggish.
The fact of the matter is if you're looking for a phone thats going to be current for the next 12 months, then get the Atrix. If you want a phone that has a vibrant screen and google updates (plus user unlockable bootloader to load ROMs every day and twice on Sundays) then get the Nexus S.
My sum up of positives and negatives of both phones are as follows:
Nexus S:
Positives -
(1) Nice screen (deep blacks and colour rich)
(2) Latest google Android OS releases (hardware permitting)
(3) Reasonable battery life (I generally get about 18 hrs of moderate use before a recharge)
(4) $599 price tag (outright)
(5) Unlimited ROM modding potential
Negatives -
(1) No gorilla glass (scratches easy and the oleophobic coating does wear off after a while - I have had 2 replacement phones because of this, and my 3rd has a screen protector on it which defeats the purpose)
(2) Back cover is glossy and scratches easy
(3) The camera displays a pinkish centre when taking photos of white sand, snow, anything with white backgrounds.
(4) 16Gb onboard and no expansion
(5) The body creeks - but its a Samsung
(6) Dropped calls after 5 minutes have been fixed in 2.3.3, but I still get the odd one dropping at the 5min mark
(7) Sometimes when typing in a phone number the press->response time/beep noise is delayed..
(8) I love Angry Birds, and there is lag in the game on certain levels..
(9) My Nexus One has more accessible RAM :-(
(10) Where's the accessories??????????? Not even a decent cradle!
(11) No HDMI out.
(12) Can't play AVI files straight out of the box - Need Rockplayer
(13) To replace the scratched battery cover, have to buy a min of 3 covers from some dodgy Chinese online outlet..
Motorola Atrix (I have the Bell Canada version)
Positives -
(1) 16Gb internal + 32Gb expansion
(2) Fast processor (and you feel it opening apps - theres literally no delays, especially the camera, browser, SMS and phone functions)
(3) No lag in games - especially Angry Birds (even AB Rio is silky smooth)
(4) Tegra II specially coded games
(5) Screen resolution is 960x540
(6) 1Gb Ram, of which you see around 515Mb on boot up
(7) Loads of accessories available now!
(8) HDMI out, and the cradle works sweeeeeet
(9) Plays AVI files out of the box using the standard video player
(10) Gorilla glass (YAY!)
(11) Rear cover doesn' scratch easily - and you can buy them in the shops
(12) Phone feels robust and solid - no body squeeks.
(13) 4G capable (AT&T version)
(14) Gingerbread is coming!
(15) I generally get 2 days out of a full charge with moderate use
(16) Is also $599 outright
Negatives -
(1) Locked bootloader (but you can still root and sideload stuff)
(2) Screen is not SAMOLED (typical SLCD)
(3) Not yet released in Australia
(4) Blur sucks (but can be replaced)
(5) Motorola isn't known for providing good support
(6) The odd wifi drop when coming out of sleep
These are my personal experiences. Others may vary.
For me, the ultimate phone would be in the form of the Atrix, but with a Nexus S user unlockable bootloader, SAMOLED 960x540 screen and Gingerbread. Really, thats all I would change.
Cheers

[Q] Atrix or Nexus S or wait for galaxy s2?

Yeah yeah, I've seen the similar threads but they're not up to date especially with gingerbread released. I'm due for an upgrade on the 26th and want to get a new phone before college in mid August. I've posted a similar forum excluding the nexus on the gs2 forum, but I want to hear the other side. I prefer the 4" screen, but also want to root and not have motoblur, and I hear the phone lags when you do that. I realize the nexus s is single core but are dual cores that much faster with current software? I like longer battery life and an led notfier since I'm coming from a blackberry Curve. Can anyone say how the screens compare, I've heard the pentile display is terrible, but have yet to see for myself. Finally I'm told that the atrix does not have neon support, is that a difference for the average user? Thanks in advance.

Thewalrus0034 said:
Yeah yeah, I've seen the similar threads but they're not up to date especially with gingerbread released. I'm due for an upgrade on the 26th and want to get a new phone before college in mid August. I've posted a similar forum excluding the nexus on the gs2 forum, but I want to hear the other side. I prefer the 4" screen, but also want to root and not have motoblur, and I hear the phone lags when you do that. I realize the nexus s is single core but are dual cores that much faster with current software? I like longer battery life and an led notfier since I'm coming from a blackberry Curve. Can anyone say how the screens compare, I've heard the pentile display is terrible, but have yet to see for myself. Finally I'm told that the atrix does not have neon support, is that a difference for the average user? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had a nexus s and it does not lag at all, neither does my atrix. Single core or dual core it doesn't seem to make a difference to me. In my experience the atrix has better battery life. As far as the screens go that's a matter of opinion, the samoled seems more vibrant but is utterly useless in sunlight. As much as I hate BLUR, I chose the atrix over the nexus s and once we have an AOSP Rom I will have no regrets whatsoever.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

Thewalrus0034 said:
Yeah yeah, I've seen the similar threads but they're not up to date especially with gingerbread released. I'm due for an upgrade on the 26th and want to get a new phone before college in mid August. I've posted a similar forum excluding the nexus on the gs2 forum, but I want to hear the other side. I prefer the 4" screen, but also want to root and not have motoblur, and I hear the phone lags when you do that. I realize the nexus s is single core but are dual cores that much faster with current software? I like longer battery life and an led notfier since I'm coming from a blackberry Curve. Can anyone say how the screens compare, I've heard the pentile display is terrible, but have yet to see for myself. Finally I'm told that the atrix does not have neon support, is that a difference for the average user? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the nexus s, it wasn't much of an improvement over my custom rommed Captivate, so I took it back. I was also looking forward to the Galaxy S2's release in America, until I got Gingerbread on my Atrix. There is no way the GS2 will be a substantial improvement over my Atrix now.
The Motorola Atrix was voted as the best phone at CES, and with Gingerbread it lives up to those accolades. Froyo and the ridiculous price of the lapdock killed this phone's initial release.
Take a look at the top results on Smartbench 2011, there is a reason Samsung delayed the GS2's release and overclocked it to 1.2ghz. Once the Atrix gets overclocked to 1.5ghz, those top results will change.

Dell2 said:
Once the Atrix gets overclocked to 1.5ghz, those top results will change.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So will the battery life lol

Also, does the lack of NEON support make a difference for the average user?
EDIT: reread my post, thought I didn't include the question, reread it again, realized I did.

Thewalrus0034 said:
Also, does the lack of NEON support make a difference for the average user?
EDIT: reread my post, thought I didn't include the question, reread it again, realized I did.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was worried about lack of neon. But honestly it doesn't even matter at this point in time, apps don't even come close to making neon cpu make any difference whatsoever.
By the way, just got an atrix today! Found craigslist superb deal.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

RogerPodacter said:
I was worried about lack of neon. But honestly it doesn't even matter at this point in time, apps don't even come close to making neon cpu make any difference whatsoever.
By the way, just got an atrix today! Found craigslist superb deal.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to play normal or hi profile x264 it does.
Really annoying to have to re-encode to baseline x264. For xxxx's sake this phone can push 3D pixels like Samurai Vengeance II but can't handle HD video encoding, WTF.

I had nexus so and atrix together for two weeks. There is major performance difference between the two. Nexus s's 512 mb ram was the deal breaker for me, it was not enough. I think I'm spoiled by the 1gb ram.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

wintermute000 said:
If you want to play normal or hi profile x264 it does.
Really annoying to have to re-encode to baseline x264. For xxxx's sake this phone can push 3D pixels like Samurai Vengeance II but can't handle HD video encoding, WTF.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saw a topic where someone played it with gingerbread, so no.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

I really like my Atrix, but I would wait and see what the next Nexus phone will bring.

Atrix ftw, i think its best phone so far for me

Sinful Animosity said:
Saw a topic where someone played it with gingerbread, so no.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well thats welcome news. I'll do some research. A really time consuming thing to investigate (encode, copy to phone, see if it plays, rinse and repeat)

I own both and I prefer the Atrix.
With an AOSP ROM this phone will scream.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Thewalrus0034 said:
Yeah yeah, I've seen the similar threads but they're not up to date especially with gingerbread released. I'm due for an upgrade on the 26th and want to get a new phone before college in mid August. I've posted a similar forum excluding the nexus on the gs2 forum, but I want to hear the other side. I prefer the 4" screen, but also want to root and not have motoblur, and I hear the phone lags when you do that. I realize the nexus s is single core but are dual cores that much faster with current software? I like longer battery life and an led notfier since I'm coming from a blackberry Curve. Can anyone say how the screens compare, I've heard the pentile display is terrible, but have yet to see for myself. Finally I'm told that the atrix does not have neon support, is that a difference for the average user? Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would stay away from the Nexus S. Ya, it's Raw Goog but the sub-par RAM, single core chip and cheap plastic construction just aren't worth it especially on a new contract.
I'm loving my Atrix on GB, rooted, de-blurred (Titanium freeze) and running Go Launcher EX. I experience no lag, web browser is lighting fast, GPS is the best I've experienced from a phone. That's my experience and opinion. Considering the timing of your upgrade I would suggest checking the SG2 out as it may be more to your liking. Some people like Sammy HW some don't (I personally hate it, especially their damn "Chin" design philosophy).
That said, you cannot go wrong with the Atrix, it's an excellent phone. I traded in my Inspire 4G at a loss and don't regret my decision one bit.
Oh, and DL/UL speed in Houston, TX I've been averaging 3.5mb down (6 max) and 1.3mb up (2.1 max). Inspire 4G never made it over 2.5 down (1 Ghz. w/ 768mb RAM). Atrix is on par with my friend's EVO 4G (Sprint WiMax, he avgs 2-3 but has a max he's gotten of 7 once) and another friend's T-Bolt (Verizon LTE, 5-6 avg and a max of 8). And yes processor and RAM do affect your up/down as it's partially determined by the amount of data your phone can process, another reason to stay away from the S at this point.

wintermute000 said:
well thats welcome news. I'll do some research. A really time consuming thing to investigate (encode, copy to phone, see if it plays, rinse and repeat)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might have been my thread. I apologize, but I was wrong. Even tough performance has increased substantially (from 8-10 fps to an average of 24) when playing high profile h.264, it still isnt perfectly smooth and, for some reason, the episodes of Game of Thrones were mute for me, which indicates a continuing lack of support to audio codecs. After converting it with the Handbrake method, it worked flawlessly.
@OP
The Atrix and the SGS2 have different offerings. SGS2 has a standardly overclocked processor, a bigger, brighter screen, less weight, and a GPU accelerated browser. The Atrix has a much higher pixel density, better battery life, and a specialized game store (Nvidia Tegra Zone which, despite the lack of titles in numbers, the ones it DOES have possess highly improved graphics over standard versions).
And for many of us, it has a lapdock, which is a perfect netbook replacement if all you do is work with word, excel, and light web browsing, being lighter and having better battery life than many netbooks. Its also fun like hell to play at customizing it

I like the overall build with the Motorola Atrix, but without the GPU accelerated and NEON support, would I be at a significant hardware disadvantage for everyday use? I feel I wouldn't. Also, any complaints about the screen?

Okay. Opera provides a gpu accelerated browser that is blazing fast. The screen is really nice, but you may notice grainy greens.
Edit: oh, neon support isn't an issue, at least for me. Most of my videos can be played using moboplayer.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App

The atrix also is not sized like a giant brick but weighing like a feather toy (the #1 reason I didn't go for the SGS2). Form factor wins for me. Not to mention in Australia, atrix is 150-200 dollars cheaper.
I would say though with froyo it is noticeably inferior. But that's no longer an issue, whether stock or unlock BL/custom ROM.

If you want a big screen and fast phone....sgs2, if you want sething new and try some mods atrix, if yu are a hard modder HD2
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App

Now that there's actual photos of the AT&T galaxy family, would anyone consider it a superior choice? I kinda like the idea of a physical keyboard but I'm used to portrait like on my blackberry.

Galaxy S II on ATT Oct 2nd $199

Sorry if its a repost. So whos going to upgrade!
http://www.engadget.com/2011/09/21/...akes-its-atandt-debut-october-2nd-for-199-on/
Im not biased to any phone. I like anything new and high powered. Cant get me wrong I love my Atrix but the Galaxy S II is tempting.

i'm pretty happy with my Atrix, i think i'm gonna hold off on upgrading until a decent quad core phone comes out on the market.

Not enough of an upgrade to think about it.
The Devs have really just started to take this phone to its capabilities so worth hanging in for a while longer.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

When the SGSII came out back in... May(ish), it seems liked I should have not gotten an Atrix and waited for the SGSII to come to AT&T. the SGSII had a bigger screen, faster CPU, no Blur, no locked bootloader, and already had a pre-beta of Cyanogen out within two weeks of the phone hitting the international market.
Fast Foward to today. The Atrix has an unlocked bootloader, a *solid* beta of CM7, MIUI in the works, a bigger battery, and the performance is close to that of the SGS (in CM7 while OC'd) - in some tests it is noticeabley faster.
The SGSII also seems to have some hardware issues that have been reported. Yellowing of the screen on the left side is the most reported issue.
Now look to the future because the SGSII isn't going to come out for another two weeks. Should we have all waited to get an SGSII? No way, not IMHO. I was sitting on an iPhone 3GS for months and months after I was eligible for an upgrade, I was just waiting until something big came out or the phone died. I'll be honest, at first I did regret my Atrix purchase at times. Software versus 4.1.26 had a TON of bugs in it, 4.1.57 did too. 4.1.83 was solid, and when we got GB the phone was pretty solid. Now with CM7 I have no complaints over the phone at all, and I'm glad I didn't suffer with my iPhone 3GS for the last 7 months (I bougt the Atrix on release day) waiting for the SGSII after returning the Atrix to wait for the SGSII.
If I had waited this long for the SGSII with my iPhone 3GS, I would likely pass up the SGSII and wait for more info on the Nexus Prime.
DK

One thing I don't miss going from my captivate to atrix is in the power usage menu "display" being like 95%. I don't know why they say SAMOLED use less power. I know the screen on the sgs and sgs2 is different but they're close enough IMO. Also after all the BS with GPS and poor update from Samsung I don't know if I could buy another. As far as specs....IMO I don't think it's worth the upgrade the specs are really similar. The only reason I might be tempted is for the dev support.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

as someone who has had both i can assure you the atrix is a much more all-around solid piece of hardware.
like reported above the screen on the SGSii may be bigger but it has its issues (yellow left on most handsets and battery consumption).
the battery is simply way worse then atrix.
and what got to me the most about going back to the atrix was the sound quality, it was simply horrendous, especially for a high-end phone like that.
the sound chip on it is sub-par compared to the original SGS even, with high end headphones i was getting distortions, low volume, and very un-even sound, to anyone who wants to listen to music on his phone this one simply kills the deal.
atrix has a very very good audio experience compared.
same goes for call quality.
and the phone doesnt even have a led for notifications.
also doesnt have an hdmi-out without you buying some special cable adapter.
what does seem to be on its side is a huge dev base working on it and realeasing things daily but the atrix is starting to catch up... just give it some time.
either way upgrading from a atrix to a galaxy 2 is pretty stupid, except for a bit larger screen you really dont get anything in return for all that cash.
i'd wait atleast another year before ditching the atrix. theres simply nothing today that it cant handle so why buy another "future proof" phone when your current one is still "future proof"

Definitely sticking with my atrix <3
Sent from my CM7 ATRIX via XDA Premium App

It appears to have a lot of dev support, but how many of those ROM's are the exact same thing with a different theme? That's the way the Captivate was until CM7 dropped...everything was the same.
I'll stick with the Atrix.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

... the screen on the SGSII is so lustworthy... it oozes awesomeness. Other then that --- Atrix is better IMO.
i want both.
iphone5 too if its nice.

i just upgraded this july so no sgsII for me. the galaxy was going to be my upgrade, but it just took too long to come out. also, it's not gonna be the latest and greatest anymore like it would've been when it came out internationally, the sgsIII will probably be out internationally in 6 months since most phone lines get upgraded yearly.
my friend mentioned the PS Vita yesterday and i'm doing research on that to see if it has enough functions to become a phone for me.

s1mpd1ddy said:
... the screen on the SGSII is so lustworthy... it oozes awesomeness. Other then that --- Atrix is better IMO.
i want both.
iphone5 too if its nice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd rather have an atrix with an average screen than have a SAMOLED that destroys my battery. I have an upgrade available and being 100% honest I'm waiting for a new BB QNX mobile phone to drop next year. The new 9810 with os7 was actually a pretty big step forward in speed and functionality and supposedly QNX will be able to run Android apps as well. Not saying it's gonna be the king of phones but it looks pretty cool.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk

My wife is getting it in October, about 2 weeks after it comes out. She is already in love with it and the fact that we are getting the NFC enabled version made her happier. She's almost as big a nerd as I am. (I'm not allowed to touch it, she wants to do everything on her own)
Speedily sent from CM7 Beta

isn't the sgs2 screen still 800 x 480?

I have the infuse plus an atrix, while the screen on the infuse is so sexy,, the atrix for me has the total package,, the sgs2 for me is not that much of a upgrade from my atrix, even the infuse for that matter, sure it has godly specs, but in real world usage, even my old ass dinc still get the job done,,
I dont like where the smartphone market is heading.. things need to slow back down. alittle,, before you know it, the atrix 3 will be out 3 months after the atrix 2 at the end of the year, lol

dLo GSR said:
isn't the sgs2 screen still 800 x 480?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is. I wouldn't be able to go to the lower resolution.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

TheBassman369 said:
It is. I wouldn't be able to go to the lower resolution.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah i forgot about that lower rez -- UGH -- why put it out at a lower rez then qHD? COME ON SAMMY.

The newer Super AMOLED Plus displays have more sub-pixels and they do not use pentile anymore which also helps eliminate the "grainy" look. I would still like to see qHD but I don't think there is going to be much to complain about on these screens.
http://www.intomobile.com/2011/02/2...s-than-previous-amoled-screens-better-colors/
http://www.oled-info.com/super-amoled-plus-resolution-explained
s1mpd1ddy said:
yeah i forgot about that lower rez -- UGH -- why put it out at a lower rez then qHD? COME ON SAMMY.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

exactly why i love the screen on my infuse.. but the atrix for everything else, lol

TheBassman369 said:
It appears to have a lot of dev support, but how many of those ROM's are the exact same thing with a different theme? That's the way the Captivate was until CM7 dropped...everything was the same.
I'll stick with the Atrix.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not all the same - they had different themes!

live4nyy said:
The newer Super AMOLED Plus displays have more sub-pixels and they do not use pentile anymore which also helps eliminate the "grainy" look. I would still like to see qHD but I don't think there is going to be much to complain about on these screens.
http://www.intomobile.com/2011/02/2...s-than-previous-amoled-screens-better-colors/
http://www.oled-info.com/super-amoled-plus-resolution-explained
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I owned an Infuse and loved the screen and the colors, but I would rather have a higher resolution screen. I find the lower resolution something to complain about, although it isn't that big of a deal for some people.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App

Can someone compare their Evo 4G to a GSIII?

I am now out of contract and thinking about moving to Verizon (for the LTE network) and the GS3.
But I'm actually pretty happy with my Evo, with roms like CM9 and MIUI its a totally new phone. So if someone has used both the phones, I'd like a little feedback about the GS3-
does it feel much faster than the Evo?
how does signal strength, gps compare to the Evo? I saw this thread - http://community.sprint.com/baw/message/443782, which doesn't give me hope for the Samsung radios
is battery life better? Currently I can get 2 days with light use on MIUI
Basically, its get the GS3 now or wait for the next Nexus phone in Dec which will have JellyBean.

I have never had the pleasure of using a GS3, but overclocking Team D.I.R.T's Remics ROM, which is based on the GS3, is a very nice substitute.
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2

The speed difference is pretty big in my opinion. Coming from the evo, things like scrolling and going in/out of apps is a big difference. Scrolling in the browser is so nice after using the evo. I'm still holing strong with my evo too, my roommate just picked one up though and its a great choice. The galaxy nexus with JB is a good option as well. Just through a JB rom on and your good to go. I know its not exactly what you wanted but just thought I would share......
MEZOCLONE

Due to poor battery life I never used my EVO for much more than phone, email, and texts.
My S3 battery is much much better, the phone is quicker, etc etc. Having said that touchwiz takes some getting used to, the Samsung keyboard sucks(using Swype beta now). If you enjoy running alternative ROMs then start on your EVO for now. If you enjoy having new fast hardware then pick up an S3 or oneX.
Sent from my Galaxy S3 using Tapatalk.

Evo LTE battery is insane. 6+ hrs screen with 24+ hrs on. Wicked build, too. Unlike Sammy.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium

scottspa74 said:
Evo LTE battery is insane. 6+ hrs screen with 24+ hrs on. Wicked build, too. Unlike Sammy.
Sent from my EVO using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have a G S III? The S III has comparable battery life and just a smidgen better than the LTE. Despite the polycarbonate body, the build quality is there. The device is smooth, solid in hand, and doesn't feel flimsy. In addition to not having an aluminum backing, it'll be less prone to signal issue, unlike I have seen with the LTE.

You cant even compare the two. Its like comparing a 1975 Cadillac Eldorado with a 2010 Nissan GT-R
All silly comparisons aside yes its WAYWAY faster GPS locks in fast and works great, and the battery is way better then my evo. I use both every day.
Evo=work
GS3=personal
Don't get me wrong, I loved my evo. I have had mine since Google IO when they gave them to us free. But come on the GS3 is current technology.
ECrispy said:
I am now out of contract and thinking about moving to Verizon (for the LTE network) and the GS3.
But I'm actually pretty happy with my Evo, with roms like CM9 and MIUI its a totally new phone. So if someone has used both the phones, I'd like a little feedback about the GS3-
does it feel much faster than the Evo?
how does signal strength, gps compare to the Evo? I saw this thread - http://community.sprint.com/baw/message/443782, which doesn't give me hope for the Samsung radios
is battery life better? Currently I can get 2 days with light use on MIUI
Basically, its get the GS3 now or wait for the next Nexus phone in Dec which will have JellyBean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

apples and oranges. my co worker has a GSII running cm9 and its stupid fast compared to my evo i can only imagine the gsiii is even better.

Picked my gs3 up today. There really is no comparison in terms of speed. Touchwiz blows hard, so I loaded up nova launcher right away.
Sent from my SPH-L710 using xda app-developers app

I played around with my friends GS3 today and it is ridiculously fast and smooth. I tried overloading it with apps running in the background and it would not slow down. I will definitely pick one up for myself eventually.

I own both — just traded up
I actually on both phones. Contract on my EVO 4G just expired, and I decided to quit Sprint because the coverage just wasn't there in my neck of the woods. So I got a GS III with AT&T, and hated it for two days because it was giving me constant, nasty Wi-Fi dropouts. Then AT&T pushed out an update — which some people are avoiding because it nukes unified search, for legal reasons — but what's not getting much press is that it also solves a lot of connectivity issues. I suspect those issues were created by some kind of power saving attempt. In any case, I have LOVED the GS III ever since that update.
Unlike some other users on this thread, I really don't think that it "blows away" the EVO. But it's way faster and the screen is quite amazing. And it sounds like you're really tempted (just like I was). So let me just share my own feelings:
I'M SO GLAD I GOT THE GSIII! The Evo is still a way cool device, don't get me wrong. But the GSIII is the new world champ, and there's just no denying it. So go ahead do what you are longing to do anyhow, and nab it!
P.S. I've kept my Evo, by the way, even though it has no phone reception, and I joined xdadevelopers so I could learn how to root it and install CM9 like you did. So let me ask YOU — what thread or post should I go to first?

Check out hipkat's guide to the evo. It is in the stickies. Check out the smelkus amon ra recovery and if you go with cm9 you will want to partition your sd card with an ext4 partition. Do lots and lots of reading before you jump into all of this of course. Have fun!
Sent from my PC36100 using xda app-developers app

Gm0n3y said:
Check out hipkat's guide to the evo. It is in the stickies. Check out the smelkus amon ra recovery and if you go with cm9 you will want to partition your sd card with an ext4 partition. Do lots and lots of reading before you jump into all of this of course. Have fun!
Sent from my PC36100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't NEED to partition, just user preference really. Never felt like partitioning and never had a problem.

teh roxxorz said:
You don't NEED to partition, just user preference really. Never felt like partitioning and never had a problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true that just seems most people do with our phones.
Sent from my PC36100 using xda app-developers app

You talking about 2010 super phone with 2012 super phone with 2gb ram come on guys. I love my EVO and HTC sense to be honest can't compare this two if you want definitely EVO 4g LTE far away better than sgs3 . Do not make me wrong like speed test ,design, camera, kick stand and UI all this EVO 4g LTE .
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium

evobb10 said:
You talking about 2010 super phone with 2012 super phone with 2gb ram come on guys. I love my EVO and HTC sense to be honest can't compare this two if you want definitely EVO 4g LTE far away better than sgs3 . Do not make me wrong like speed test ,design, camera, kick stand and UI all this EVO 4g LTE .
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd have to disagree about the Evo LTE being "far away better" than the GS3. My sister has one, and as much as I love the screen (it really is as good as they say), I prefer the way the GS3 feels in my hand (except that it feels a little more fragile), and the extra gig of RAM will make a huge difference when I flash MIUI on it. The camera seems to be about the same quality judging by reviews, so that's a wash. The kickstand would be nice, but even when I wanted to use it on my OG Evo, I was barely ever in a place to set my phone down. Speed-wise, I have yet to see either phone stutter or lag (except that the XDA Premium app lags on the GS3 when scrolling through threads; seems to be a problem with cached/caching images, but I never had a lag problem on my OG Evo), and they use the same SoC, so they should be about equal anyway. As for UI, I'm going to put MIUI on my S3 ASAP and would have done the same with the Evo LTE, so that doesn't matter either. Things I like better about the Evo LTE are the capacitive buttons and lack of a menu button. Not a fan of the S3's home button, especially the fact that it wakes the phone.
As for comparisons to the OG Evo, it's a different experience altogether (crazy to say since they're both Android phones), not only because of the new hardware, but also because of TouchWiz. I could compare them feature-for-feature, but we all know the S3 will win or at least tie for every spec (except HDMI, I think; a proprietary MHL adapter complicates things, but since MHL is standard now, micro-HDMI cables are harder to find and expensive). The things that impress me the most about the S3 are the speed (obviously) and the battery life. 6 hours of screen on time is normal with the S3. My Evo died around the 2.5 hour mark. It makes a huge difference.
This is off topic, but I was curious exactly how long the Evo's battery might last with no use at all, so when I got my S3, I gave my Evo one last charge and set it aside. I turned on airplane mode after a couple hours but left Wifi on (more out of habit than part of the test), then turned Wifi off after another hour or so (when I remembered it was on and draining the battery), and it's been in complete airplane mode ever since. Well, it's been 9 days and 16 hours since I took it off the charger, and I still have 50% battery left. I honestly didn't think the li'l ol' Evo had it in him, even if it is just sitting idle. I'm pleasantly surprised, but I can't help but wish the battery lasted at least a tenth as long when using the phone as it's lasting now.

I was going to switch to Verizon since I'd rather have LTE speeds for the same price, but the locked boot loader is making me think twice.

gs3 kicks real arse, how can i compare them. evo is outdated afaik.
Sent from my SGH-T989