Related
Appologies for duplicating this post here and on the accessories forum but needed a quick answer!
Anyone technically minded who can answer this....
I am using a HTC Touch Pro mains charger for my X1 (as it has a longer cable) which charges the X1 fully.
I did notice the back of the X1 getting a little warm, so double checked the outputs on the original X1 charger and the TouchPro one.
X1 = 5v 700mA
TouchPro = 5v 1A
Is this likely to be a problem?
You should definately not mix power adapters like that. On the other hand they both use mini-USB plugs so if they follow the USB standard (Battery Charging Specification) you are okay. The spec allows for up to 1,8 A, but that does not mean the X1 can take it.
I would have rather bought an extension cable for the X1 charger. Then you are safe _if_ anything happens and you damage your X1. :|
If you need a longer cable, just plug in a standard USB extension cable It will work perfectly and you can extend to plenty of meters if you need to.
Regarding the use of the 1A charger, I don't think it will be that much of a problem, but I wouldn't count on it to cause no problems either. The battery getting warm is not that odd when charging, as batteries generally generate heat when they get charged. The fact that it gets warmer with the 1A, instead of the 0.7A charger, is just because you charge the battery quicker, which in turn causes more heat. You should keep it mind though that heat is a bad thing for LiIon batteries like the X1 uses. Having it being warm reduces lifetime quicker then when it's cool.
maedox said:
You should definately not mix power adapters like that. On the other hand they both use mini-USB plugs so if they follow the USB standard (Battery Charging Specification) you are okay. The spec allows for up to 1,8 A, but that does not mean the X1 can take it.
I would have rather bought an extension cable for the X1 charger. Then you are safe _if_ anything happens and you damage your X1. :|
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your help. I assumed - like you - that USB was USB in regards to power output. But I will take your advice and get an extension and stop using the old one.
Cheers
.
What I've seen on battery charging on mobile phones is that they have an internal intelligent charging system, at least the Siemens and Wavecom systems I've been using.
LiIon batteries are normally charged using constant voltage/constant current until a certain voltage level is reached, ~4.2V for 3.6V batteries. Then the charge current is reduced with a constant voltage until the charging current reaches zero. This implies that from a 5V charger there has to be some sort of internal charging system to make it work.
If you get a charger for USB it is the internal system that handles the current rate, not the charger. The specs on the charger shows the maximum current possible, not the charger's constant charge rate.
So if the phone's internal charging system thinks it's ok with 1A it will use it, but as mentioned earlier, it will produce more heat, but with a faster charging.
Though USB charging specs is limited to 1.8A, most charging circuits is possible to set to less current, with some part charging the battery, the rest powering the phone.
on8a said:
What I've seen on battery charging on mobile phones is that they have an internal intelligent charging system, at least the Siemens and Wavecom systems I've been using.
LiIon batteries are normally charged using constant voltage/constant current until a certain voltage level is reached, ~4.2V for 3.6V batteries. Then the charge current is reduced with a constant voltage until the charging current reaches zero. This implies that from a 5V charger there has to be some sort of internal charging system to make it work.
If you get a charger for USB it is the internal system that handles the current rate, not the charger. The specs on the charger shows the maximum current possible, not the charger's constant charge rate.
So if the phone's internal charging system thinks it's ok with 1A it will use it, but as mentioned earlier, it will produce more heat, but with a faster charging.
Though USB charging specs is limited to 1.8A, most charging circuits is possible to set to less current, with some part charging the battery, the rest powering the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks very much that's very informative.
I am wondering if the X1 has this internal intelligent charging system you mentioned. Would be useful to know.
Actually the mA ratings are what the charger can deliver. Not what they actually will deliver. A 700mA rated charger will supply up to 700mA if asked for by the device. This is a two way thing. The charger side will never provide more than it's maximum rating, it's a built in safety thing. The charged side should never ask for more than it can handle, providing that it is a well built piece of electronics. I trust the X1 to be well built on this. USB standards rate a maximum of 500mA for high power devices. The X1 does adapt and thus will charge slower.
Glad this is being discussed; as my X1 is a UK model, I don't have a US wall charger.
I found some on monoprice.com, see under the Power to USB section at the bottom:
http://www.monoprice.com/products/subdepartment.asp?c_id=103&cp_id=10311
They have 3 varieties:
High-Speed WALL Power to USB Female Converter (1000mah) - Black
High-Speed WALL Power to USB Female Converter (1000mah) - White
[**cant tell a discernable difference between those two, but one is larger...**]
WALL Power to USB Female CHARGER Converter - Black (500mah)
[**many people complaining about this not charging their devices; either it really does suck or they didnt get one with enough output**]
I WONT kill the phone picking up a 1000mah?
Anyone else in my situation needing a new US charger, this site has great prices on this stuff... these adapters are under 2 bucks, and USB cables are super-cheap too!
Decided to make a seperate thread for this. Maybe a mod could move those posts over...
scoob8000 said:
This is very interesting.. Gonna order one of those adaptors. I have another possible source that I'll call and see if they can get them.
Dx rocks but I lack the patience to wait for overseas shipping.
Food for thought..
I have a cheapo 4 port usb hub on my night stand for charging all my devices. It is limited to 500ma per port. Ive noticed it won't charge my atrix. Guessing 500ma isn't enough..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rred said:
scoob-
"It is limited to 500ma per port. Ive noticed it won't charge my atrix. Guessing 500ma isn't enough.."
No, physics doesn't work like that. If the VOLTAGE from your USB device is above the charging voltage for the phone, even a 100mA charger would be enough to charge the phone up. It would just take a long time, perhaps 22-24 hours to do so.
The normal Moto chargers are about 1000mA and they charge the phone quickly, usually two hours or less. But Moto has been making very generous chargers for years, they even supplied a 1000mA charger with my bt earpiece, which doesn't need that much power at all.
If a 500mA charger hasn't fully charged your phone in 4 hours, there's something else wrong. Bad wire, bad contact, not plugged in tight...or the "Made in China" effect.<G>
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_Dennis_ said:
No you are wrong sir. The phone will not charge on a 500 ma charge. It will use less battery but 500ma charger is not sufficient to both power the device and charge it. Also the charger supplied it 750ma charger and if you are running 1.2.6 the phone will refuse 1a chargers. Just because something provides voltage in the correct range does not mean ut provides enough energy to charge something else. Voltage is potential current is actual power. Just plug your phone into a USB socket without the computer having drivers (there by limiting the socket to 500ma) it won't charge.
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
scoob8000 said:
Sorry OP for the threadjacking..
I'm familiar with Ohm's law, where I was headed is I think the phone may be doing one of two things. (purely guessing )
It may just be adhering to USB specs. It realizes the hub is a USB device and not just a charger. Since there is no computer on the other side, to negotiate more than 100ma it just doesn't charge.
Or the voltage drop @ 500ma (my hubs max per port) is just too high to enter charging. Worth noting, is when the battery is >90 and I plug the hub in, the notification led lights, but the battery still discharges.
I need to hack up a usb cord to take some voltage/current measurements. Maybe I'm just being OCD, but I like to "slow charge" my devices while I sleep.
[edit] I think I'm going to try making a charge only USB cable... That might answer some questions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rred said:
Dennis?
"It will use less battery but 500ma charger is not sufficient to both power the device and charge it."
Powering the phone, and charging the phone, and simultaneously doing both, are three different things.
The 500mA is sufficient to CHARGE the phone, that's all I said. I have no idea how much power it takes to POWER the phone with all four radios (BT, GPS, Wifi, cellular) active and music or Angry Birds playing at the same time. The power drain for each of those may be significant.
But since the phone has a ~1900mAh battery, you can establish the phone's power drain by turning on "everything" and letting the battery drain from full charge. If it takes four hours to go dead...yes, the phone may consume 500mA all by itself, leaving nothing to charge the battery. Again, that's physics, and it applies the same way to every laptop and phone on the market, and other devices that use adapter/chargers.
I stand by what I said: 500mA will fully recharge the battery in about 4 hours. I did NOT say it would power all four radios and play music as well as charging the phone at the same time. You'll have to do your own math to find that out, but the physics remains the same. My phone usually charges while I sleep, and a 500mA source will do that very nicely, with just the cellular radio enabled, and not in conversation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I just made a little USB breakout cable so I could do a little investigation..
Oddly, even with the stock charger and the data lines disconnected the Atrix will not charge. I'm supecting most AC chargers must supply power on the data lines as well, or do something with them that triggers the device to charge.
As for the voltage, my hub and oem charger both throw out 5.12v with no load. When I plug the phone in, there is no drop at all.
From what my googling turns up, I may need a 180ish ohm resistor between the data lines. The phone looks for that to enter charging mode. Apparently this is why the drivers are needed for charging on some computers. Instead of resistance, it gets the charge signal from the pc.
So anyway out of curiosity I also took a few load readings:
Battery at 40%, screen off, phone idle: 600~ma
The most I could get it to pull was with battery at 40%, streaming last fm over a BT headset, and running quadrant. I saw around 690ma at peak.
Voice calls don't seem to make much of a difference. 10-15ma.
I'm going to check again with a full battery once it's charged. That ought to tell us what the phone itself is using.
I'm using a 550ma 5v charger because it has a longer reach. I stream music, cruise the net, watch videos and it charges my phone no problem.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
So with a completely full battery:
Idle, screen off: 100~ma
full load (same as before): 400ma at peak
Either I am lucky and got a better one, or everyone else is wrong on the standard charger. Mine is 850ma. Also, my phone will charge on USB 2 (500ma) if screen is off and I do not use the phone. It's slow but it charges. On USB 3 it charges about half the speed it does on mains.
Sent from WinBorg 4G via XDA premium app
scoob-
"As for the voltage, my hub and oem charger both throw out 5.12v with no load."
Were you using a lab calibrated voltmeter? <G>
Most digital multimeters have a stated accuracy something like 1/2 to 1% on the DC voltages, and then they also have a "float" of 2-4 LSD meaning, the least significant digit (the rightmost one on whatever scale) may float by 2-4 digits.
So on a typical meter where you have a choice between a 2.000 volt scale, and a 20.00 volt scale, "_5.00" on the display could just as easily read "5.05" if it is was 1% off, within the limits of accuracy. And then 5.05 could read 5.09 or 5.00 as the digits float. The errors sometimes cancel out, sometimes accumulate.
I've seen much worse as they get old and out of calibration, where a "12.00" volt reading on one meter was 12.3 on another.
Which is just to say that 5.12 might actually be 5.00, or whatever the USB spec actually calls for. (It doesn't have to be 5.00 exactly.)
I had no idea they needed a signal voltage (available from the data lines on microUSB but not miniUSB) to enter charge state. That "should" mean that you can't use a miniUSB charger with a micro adapter for simple charging. I'll have to try that to see what happens. [ [LATER] Nope, something's not right about needing the signal resistor, because I just charged my Atrix using a miniUSB charger (no data signal possible) with a mini-to-micro power tip adapter, which "should" not be presenting any signal, just passing through the 4 old style connections. ]
There will still be simple--if unpublished or poorly documented--rules of physics governing what happens. Battery charging isn't rocket science, although battery chargers are sometimes "smarter" than rockets are.<G>
CaelanT,
Mines also 850ma..
Rred,
I actually splurged on a very (I think) good meter a few years ago. It's a Fluke 187. They claim .025% DC accuracy. Granted, I've had it a few years and never sent it back in for calibration.
I actually found two sides to having a resistor in the connector.
One story starts with Motorola trying to enforce people using only "genuine" chargers. Link
The other points to the data lines being shorted to indicate to the device that it is a dedicated charging device. Link Skip to the last paragraoh on this page. It's very long winded.
I actually tore apart a old car charger, in the mini usb plug there lied a small resistor between the data pins. I didn't believe how simple it was until I saw it.
Pretty interesting stuff. For us geeks anyway.
scoob, a Fluke is like a Rolls-Royce, except it is more reliable.<G>
The resistors are documented as part of the microUSB spec, they are what are often called "pull-up resistors", i.e. the voltage they provide to the fifth wire "pulls up" the voltage on that line and the tiny brains see that as a signal to do something specific.
Even the Palm Treos used this system. Not on the power line, but on the audio jack. they use a single 3-wire 2.5mm standard minijack and depending on the impedances that they see on it, they will provide mono audio, stereo audio, or mic input plus mono audio, so that three types of devices all plug into the same plug--but all three are sensed and work differently. As Arthur Clarke said "Any sufficiently advanced technology will be indistinguishable from magic."
There's no Moto conspiracy to the resistors, the new microUSB spec provides magic and the industry just doesn't want to bother our pretty little heads by talking about it in any detail.
Now, why Moto omitted the call audio routines from the library on these phones...THAT'S probably a conspiracy.<G>
I'm not reading all 480+ pages of the final USB3 spec, but it appears to refer to standard devices as consuming one "unit" of power at 150mA, with a maximum of six "units" or 900mA, and a maximum voltage of "5" which would mean that if Moto is supplying 5.12V @ 1000mA...they've exceeded the spec and aren't entitled to use the USB logo.
But if they'll fix my call audio library, I won't tell a soul about that.<VBG>
I have a Verizon Galaxy Tab 7.7 i815.
It's an amazing tablet for video playback because of the large AMOLED screen. Comparable to plasma screens.
So, the problem I have is that while it's great for this, it is also extremely picky on the charger. Basically, the only thing I can get to recharge this is with the Samsung usb charger that plugs into power.
It will not even charge from the computer.
And of course, it refuses to charge from portable power banks. This is kind of a big deal because the battery life of this tablet is pretty bad, so being able to use a power bank would be great.
Any idea why this is? How to fix? Maybe I just have a bad unit? What's going on?
taiwwa said:
I have a Verizon Galaxy Tab 7.7 i815.
It's an amazing tablet for video playback because of the large AMOLED screen. Comparable to plasma screens.
So, the problem I have is that while it's great for this, it is also extremely picky on the charger. Basically, the only thing I can get to recharge this is with the Samsung usb charger that plugs into power.
It will not even charge from the computer.
And of course, it refuses to charge from portable power banks. This is kind of a big deal because the battery life of this tablet is pretty bad, so being able to use a power bank would be great.
Any idea why this is? How to fix? Maybe I just have a bad unit? What's going on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You need an adapter to charge with computer or battery or anything besides the stock charger. I was trying to find one on ebay without success. I will look again. The one I have is made by Pizen and was $2.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/FOR-Samsung...=Laptop_Adapters_Chargers&hash=item1c36f25bea
You need something like this.
Sent from my GT-P6810 using xda app-developers app
taiwwa said:
I have a Verizon Galaxy Tab 7.7 i815.
It's an amazing tablet for video playback because of the large AMOLED screen. Comparable to plasma screens.
So, the problem I have is that while it's great for this, it is also extremely picky on the charger. Basically, the only thing I can get to recharge this is with the Samsung usb charger that plugs into power.
It will not even charge from the computer.
And of course, it refuses to charge from portable power banks. This is kind of a big deal because the battery life of this tablet is pretty bad, so being able to use a power bank would be great.
Any idea why this is? How to fix? Maybe I just have a bad unit? What's going on?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine (a P6800) charges normally from USB (only with the screen off and charges VERY slowly, though; despite the battery icon showing an "X") and from my power bank. That power bank is chinese, got it from DealExtreme, and puts out 2A of current (the same as the stock charger). The battery icon also shows an "X" when charging from it, though.
Are you sure it doesn't charge? Or does it display an "X" but still charges when not in use?
Steve_max said:
Mine (a P6800) charges normally from USB (only with the screen off and charges VERY slowly, though; despite the battery icon showing an "X") and from my power bank. That power bank is chinese, got it from DealExtreme, and puts out 2A of current (the same as the stock charger). The battery icon also shows an "X" when charging from it, though.
Are you sure it doesn't charge? Or does it display an "X" but still charges when not in use?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just for info.
The stock kernel will allow only USB charge at a rate of 450mA, regardless of a power bank or PC USB connection. Max AC is 1500mA.
my P6800/P6810 SkyHigh kernel will USB charge up to AC max (1500mA), using same device circuitry. The kernel is also modded to allow charging icon animation when connected to USB power source. This is because it thinks the source is AC. There are no System.UI.apk changes needed
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
how do you install this?
taiwwa said:
how do you install this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, the kernel will only work on P6800/P6810 devices (if that's what you're referring to). Was was info about charging rates...
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
UpInTheAir said:
Just for info.
The stock kernel will allow only USB charge at a rate of 450mA, regardless of a power bank or PC USB connection. Max AC is 1500mA.
my P6800/P6810 SkyHigh kernel will USB charge up to AC max (1500mA), using same device circuitry. The kernel is also modded to allow charging icon animation when connected to USB power source. This is because it thinks the source is AC. There are no System.UI.apk changes needed
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AC max is 1.5A? Weird... The charger is good for 2A, and we've got more than enough battery to charge at 2A safely. Any way to increase the AC limit on your kernel, maybe configurable by a file/variable/etc?
And I'm pretty sure the device charges at more than 450mA from my power bank. Just checked, and realized that the charging icon appears normally (on stock 4.1 kernel). Galaxy Charging Current reports a 2A current on my S3 (Temasek kernel, adjusted for a maximum of 2000 mA on AC, 1200 mA on USB3 and 650 mA on USB2). Some power banks appear exactly like an AC charger as far as the USB connection is concerned.
Steve_max said:
AC max is 1.5A? Weird... The charger is good for 2A, and we've got more than enough battery to charge at 2A safely. Any way to increase the AC limit on your kernel, maybe configurable by a file/variable/etc?
And I'm pretty sure the device charges at more than 450mA from my power bank. Just checked, and realized that the charging icon appears normally (on stock 4.1 kernel). Galaxy Charging Current reports a 2A current on my S3 (Temasek kernel, adjusted for a maximum of 2000 mA on AC, 1200 mA on USB3 and 650 mA on USB2). Some power banks appear exactly like an AC charger as far as the USB connection is concerned.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why weird? Is all in the P6800 kernel source code.... I've not mentioned SGS3 ....
Those apps may just detect the source input, not the actual charge rate limited by kernel. Big difference afraid.
If the P6800 stock kernel detects it being charged as USB, all you will actually get is max 450mA. Same goes for AC, may show the source input greater, but charging rate is limited to max 1500mA. You can see my kernel commits on gitHub and study for yourself.
Remember, those charging current apps while useful, do have a large degree of variance as well.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
UpInTheAir said:
Why weird? Is all in the P6800 kernel source code.... I've not mentioned SGS3 ....
Those apps may just detect the source input, not the actual charge rate limited by kernel. Big difference afraid.
If the P6800 stock kernel detects it being charged as USB, all you will actually get is max 450mA. Same goes for AC, may show the source input greater, but charging rate is limited to max 1500mA. You can see my kernel commits on gitHub and study for yourself.
Remember, those charging current apps while useful, do have a large degree of variance as well.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird because the charger that comes with the P6800 is rated 2A, and the P6800 battery is big enough to charge at 2A and stay under 0.7C. There is no reason at all to limit the charge to only 1.5A, unless the circuitry won't handle that (which would be a bad screwup by Samsung). I just asked if it is possible to change this "hard" limit on your kernel. I didn't mention the I9300 on this point, only as an example of a device where this is adjustable on custom kernels (it's also adjustable on your I9500, by the way, check Perseus kernel).
Actually, that app detect the actual charge rate as limited by the kernel (on the I9300). That app doesn't work on the P6800, because the kernel doesn't output those values. On the I9300, some kernels allow you to configure the maximum input current (@5V, from the charger) and the maximum current output (@~4.35V, to charge the battery). But that is not important; my point was just that some power banks (like mine) have the exact same USB connection as a regular wall charger, so the phone/tablet/whatever sees it as a regular wall charger even on stock kernel. The OP could search for one of those, if his device charges normally from wall chargers it will charge from a power bank like this.
And BTW, Apple chargers are crap, they won't output full current unless they detect an Apple device. So, no Android/WP/etc will charge correctly from an Apple charger.
Steve_max said:
Weird because the charger that comes with the P6800 is rated 2A, and the P6800 battery is big enough to charge at 2A and stay under 0.7C. There is no reason at all to limit the charge to only 1.5A, unless the circuitry won't handle that (which would be a bad screwup by Samsung). I just asked if it is possible to change this "hard" limit on your kernel. I didn't mention the I9300 on this point, only as an example of a device where this is adjustable on custom kernels (it's also adjustable on your I9500, by the way, check Perseus kernel).
Actually, that app detect the actual charge rate as limited by the kernel (on the I9300). That app doesn't work on the P6800, because the kernel doesn't output those values. On the I9300, some kernels allow you to configure the maximum input current (@5V, from the charger) and the maximum current output (@~4.35V, to charge the battery). But that is not important; my point was just that some power banks (like mine) have the exact same USB connection as a regular wall charger, so the phone/tablet/whatever sees it as a regular wall charger even on stock kernel. The OP could search for one of those, if his device charges normally from wall chargers it will charge from a power bank like this.
And BTW, Apple chargers are crap, they won't output full current unless they detect an Apple device. So, no Android/WP/etc will charge correctly from an Apple charger.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Comparing kernels from different boards and CPU etc is like comparing apples and oranges.
If I could make the charge current configurable in my kernel, don't you think I would have already? Not everything is "cut and paste" and I expended allot of time in trying to port the mod for our current hardware.
Yeah, I've used just about all the kernels (at time of owing device) including perseus, siyah etc, do have good experienceI with configurable kernel charge. After using/having SGS2 x2, SGS3 x1, SGS4 x1 and SGT P6810 x1, it's not the first time I've heard of it.....
I won't be increasing max charge rate on the SkyHigh kernel above 1500mA. This generally increases battery heat and shortens lifespan.
On stock kernel + unmodified systemUI.apk for battery charge icons, if the kernel detects ANY charge source as USB, the max rate will be 450 mA. You will not see any battery charging animation (just the red x), which is a "sure fire way" to check.
In short, on our SGT-7.7, under stock conditions, if you connect ANY charging source and you DON'T have the battery charge animation, it will be USB charge at 450mA max.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
UpInTheAir said:
Comparing kernels from different boards and CPU etc is like comparing apples and oranges.
If I could make the charge current configurable in my kernel, don't you think I would have already? Not everything is "cut and paste" and I expended allot of time in trying to port the mod for our current hardware.
Yeah, I've used just about all the kernels (at time of owing device) including perseus, siyah etc, do have good experienceI with configurable kernel charge. After using/having SGS2 x2, SGS3 x1, SGS4 x1 and SGT P6810 x1, it's not the first time I've heard of it.....
I won't be increasing max charge rate on the SkyHigh kernel above 1500mA. This generally increases battery heat and shortens lifespan.
On stock kernel + unmodified systemUI.apk for battery charge icons, if the kernel detects ANY charge source as USB, the max rate will be 450 mA. You will not see any battery charging animation (just the red x), which is a "sure fire way" to check.
In short, on our SGT-7.7, under stock conditions, if you connect ANY charging source and you DON'T have the battery charge animation, it will be USB charge at 450mA max.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't say it would be an easy/simple port, I just asked if it was possible. I didn't look at your github (and I have almost no experience with the P6800 kernel)... You know your sources better than anyone else, so I assumed you would understand better than I do what (and where) would need to be changed. I'm not diminishing your work or your effort in any way, shape or form; I respect the developers who stuck with this amazing device for so long, and who continue to make it usable way past what Samsung intended.
Our battery has a total capacity of 5100 mAh. From http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/charging_lithium_ion_batteries:
The charge rate of a typical consumer Li-ion battery is between 0.5 and 1C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That gives us a "safe" maximum charging rate of between 2550 mA and 5100 mA. 0.7C is generally agreed as a good rate for this first stage charge for Li-Po batteries, which means 3570 mA; the regulators on the tablet will reduce the rate when needed. Generally, charging Li-ion/Li-po batteries at such a low rate (~0.3C) is detrimental to the battery max charge, and a major screwup by Samsung (and explains why my P6800's battery doesn't last as long now as it did on its first month); that is why I asked. But that was just a question. If you won't do it, I respect your position.
About charging from the power bank, I don't get your point. As I said, when I plug my P6800 on my power bank, I don't get the red X; I see the regular charging animation, and the device charges as fast as it does on the stock wall charger (which is just an adapter that presents an USB connection where you plug the tablet's cable). I understand that when the tablet recognizes it's on a standard USB port, it will use the lower charge rate. But "power-only" USB ports, such as the one on the Samsung wall charger and the one on some power banks, will be recognized as power-only connections (or as the same as the Samsung wall charger), and will charge the device as fast as the kernel allows.
My power bank (this model to be precise) is detected as an AC charger on both my I9300 and my P6800, and would be a good option for the OP.
Don't get my point? Please 're-read the last paragraph in my previous post carefully.... I wasn't disputing your claim, but explaining about the battery charge icon.
Obviously your power bank has some "trickery" to fool the device as AC charge. Probably a resistor combo across the lines inside the source. This being the case, makes a good option for OP (or anyone else) on stock.
UpInTheAir said:
Don't get my point? Please 're-read the last paragraph in my previous post carefully.... I wasn't disputing your claim, but explaining about the battery charge icon.
Obviously your power bank has some "trickery" to fool the device as AC charge. Probably a resistor combo across the lines inside the source. This being the case, makes a good option for OP (or anyone else) on stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, one of my power banks would trick my tab on one of its ports. some resistor thing.
Its due to having resistors put across the data lines.
This is done to trigger the tablet into AC charging mode.
the wall charger has this done to it.
some batterys have a samsung charger cable or a micro usb adapter.
This adapter has resisters inside it.
i have one of these and charges on ac charging.
if i get another cable such as data or car charger etc..
it wont trigger charge even on 2 amps.
good news is a adapter can be made to go from usb to usb...look it up it has 2 resisters in it and also shorts the data lines to each other.
MRBR7 said:
Its due to having resistors put across the data lines.
This is done to trigger the tablet into AC charging mode.
the wall charger has this done to it.
some batterys have a samsung charger cable or a micro usb adapter.
This adapter has resisters inside it.
i have one of these and charges on ac charging.
if i get another cable such as data or car charger etc..
it wont trigger charge even on 2 amps.
good news is a adapter can be made to go from usb to usb...look it up it has 2 resisters in it and also shorts the data lines to each other.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just as I presumed. Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I have a charger that has two usb ports in it. One says ipad and the other galaxy tab.
If I use the ipad one and use it on the 7.7 it thinks an usb device is connected, shows the charging icon and also the red x, but doesn't charge. I think it just has to do with the voltage it receives on certain pins, but what is the meaning of the cross?
Menster said:
I have a charger that has two usb ports in it. One says ipad and the other galaxy tab.
If I use the ipad one and use it on the 7.7 it thinks an usb device is connected, shows the charging icon and also the red x, but doesn't charge. I think it just has to do with the voltage it receives on certain pins, but what is the meaning of the cross?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As it will accept a max of 450mA on detected "USB charge", it still should charge, but very slowly.
If you leave the screen off for a while, you should see the battery % indicator increase. If you use the tab while on detected USB charge, the device may consume more current than 450mA, hence the battery % indicator may not increase but instead decrease.
Sent from my GT-I9500 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
So we just upgraded to Note 3 from our galaxy 3 (wife and I)...
I noticed the charger is a 2 amp charger compared to the SGS 3's 1 amp.
I started reading some threads here and found out the USB 3.0 cable will not charge the phone faster unless it's plugged into the computer.
Apparently the PCM also limits the phone to charging at 900ma. (not verified)
so I'm curious now.... at what amps does this phone charge? I'm trying to get a spare charger to keep in the car, and also trying to get a usb car charger if I can benefit from the 2.1 amp one instead of the 1 amp one that's in there now....
Can anyone tell me if I should get a 2.1amp charger or stick with 1 amp chargers as the spares if it'll still charge at 900ma?
I'm using USB 2.0 cables btw. (unless I can charge faster with the USB 3.0 when plugged to a car charger or the wall, which I apparently won't from my research here)
While I await for responses, I will plug the charger into my voltage/amp reader and we'll see how much power is being drawn, which might give an idea as to how many ma it's charging at.
For whoever that wants to know this information, these are my findings from my meter that is able to measure how much power is being drawn (kill a watt P3)
with the stock charger and USB 2.0 cable (3.0 made no difference) the phone will charge at 900ma with the screen on. If the phone is shut off, or screen is off, it goes to 1500ma. Very steady at those.
with the SGS3 charger that I had, it's a constant 900ma whether screen is on or off... (1.0 amp charger)
now I guess I will have to see if this is the case with any 2.1 amp charger, or if it's specific to samsung's charger with snapdragon's quick charge feature. I believe only certain chargers allow use of this.
I don't know, I'm getting 1800mA by using stock wall charger with USB3 cable and 450 with USB2 cable. I know GS3 would charge at faster rate when using original Samsung wall charger and cable, which had data lines shorted, not sure if it's the same with Note3.
I don't remember for sure, but I think charging rate from computer was pretty much the same 450mA regardless of USB3 or USB2 port or cable. I remember this because I was surprised they didn't take advantage of higher power ratings with USB3, but maybe it was just my particular setup. I used application that shows charging rate, so all is with phone on, but it makes perfect sense, about 2 hours from 0 to 100% charge, if you allow some extra time for trickle charge at the end, losses and usage.
pete4k said:
I don't know, I'm getting 1800mA by using stock wall charger with USB3 cable and 450 with USB2 cable. I know GS3 would charge at faster rate when using original Samsung wall charger and cable, which had data lines shorted, not sure if it's the same with Note3.
I don't remember for sure, but I think charging rate from computer was pretty much the same 450mA regardless of USB3 or USB2 port or cable. I remember this because I was surprised they didn't take advantage of higher power ratings with USB3, but maybe it was just my particular setup. I used application that shows charging rate, so all is with phone on, but it makes perfect sense, about 2 hours from 0 to 100% charge, if you allow some extra time for trickle charge at the end, losses and usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and how did you measure this 1800mA?
razorseal said:
and how did you measure this 1800mA?
program is called galaxy charging current, you can get it in the play store.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can't compare that app to a meter that shows you the actual current being drawn
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk
why not? How do you think your meter is working? Phone has similar IC. How did you come up with your numbers first of all? I thought you plug Kill a watt into outlet and it shows what the charger is using at 110v and at about 10 watts(or is it 220-240v for your location), your unit maybe at the limit of accuracy, since the amperage would be somewhere around 100mA, where your device is designed more for larger power consumption like fridge or TV running 300-1000watts and few amps. Is your unit somehow capable of measuring what the charger is outputting and if so, how?
BTW you can't get more than 900mA from PC even over USB3, thats the max limit.
I checked again: galaxy S3 wall charger is giving me 600mA, Note3 charger with USB2 cable gives me 1200mA and Note 3 charger with USB3 cable pumps out 1800mA, computer USB gives 450mA regardless of computer port, but there is something wrong with the USB3 cable that I got, is not connecting properly and I have to wiggle it to connect so maybe bad cable is the reason I don't get higher charge rate from PC USB3.
Any one Disappointed with the charger they included with the Pure. The non removable cord just sucks and a poor choice in my opinion
I'm more disappointed at the size of the wall wart. They could have made more friendly to other power strip users.
razor237 said:
Any one Disappointed with the charger they included with the Pure. The non removable cord just sucks and a poor choice in my opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pretty sure they did that so you couldn't just stick any usb charging cord in their...it'd most likely fry it.
The disappointing part is the my other cords not working with Android auto. Luckily I have a nexus 6, and the cord with its charger works.
Sent from my P01MA using Tapatalk
brholt6 said:
Pretty sure they did that so you couldn't just stick any usb charging cord in their...it'd most likely fry it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess that could be a reason but highly doubt anything would be fried. Ive been using a nexus 6 turbo charger and before that i was using a note 4 charger to charge multiple android/apple devices without issue. This just limits what i can charge on a single charger now need a second lol
razor237 said:
I guess that could be a reason but highly doubt anything would be fried. Ive been using a nexus 6 turbo charger and before that i was using a note 4 charger to charge multiple android/apple devices without issue. This just limits what i can charge on a single charger now need a second lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you plugged in a charging cord that can't handle the increased power it sure could fry the cord. I feel ya though...it would be nice if it were a USB cord.
I'm glad it looks different.... My son knows NOT to plug his HTC M7 into this charger.
I can see if this was someones first Android, the lack of a micro-USB for data would be frustrating, but I have about 5 of these in my desk drawer and throughout my house and office, so it doesn't bother me.
Also having a fixed cord means you don't pulg some 'slow' cable in and not get any benefits. Out my 8-10 micro USB cables, only 2-3 get a decent charge speed.
tele_jas said:
I'm glad it looks different.... My son knows NOT to plug his HTC M7 into this charger.
I can see if this was someones first Android, the lack of a micro-USB for data would be frustrating, but I have about 5 of these in my desk drawer and throughout my house and office, so it doesn't bother me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If a device that does not do Turbo Charging is connected, the charger should automatically adjust and charge it at regular speed. At least, that's what it is supposed to do. The Turbo Charger is supposed to be the single charger for all types.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
Darnell_Chat_TN said:
If a device that does not do Turbo Charging is connected, the charger should automatically adjust and charge it at regular speed. At least, that's what it is supposed to do. The Turbo Charger is supposed to be the single charger for all types.
Sent from my Nexus 10 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good, because I know I'll find his phone on that charger some day
I still have my galaxy s6 nexus charger that is a fast charging and it seems to work fine with turbo charging
Sent from my LG-H345 using XDA Free mobile app
I think the reason they made the cable fixed is because a lot of cheaper usb cables use very thin wire gauges. Since this charger puts out a lot of current at varying voltages, it's very possible for a thin cable to overheat easier and catch on fire. And my guess is, they didn't want to take any chances
How do we determine if turbo charger is ongoing? I mean are there any indication? Coz when I plug in the TurboCharger that comes with it, sometimes TurboPower Connected shows at the bottom of the screen, sometimes not. Then when I check it on the Status, it says Charging over USB, not Charging over AC? Could be that my unit is defective? perhaps the charger? or the battery?
DrearierJester1 said:
How do we determine if turbo charger is ongoing? I mean are there any indication? Coz when I plug in the TurboCharger that comes with it, sometimes TurboPower Connected shows at the bottom of the screen, sometimes not. Then when I check it on the Status, it says Charging over USB, not Charging over AC? Could be that my unit is defective? perhaps the charger? or the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got the same issue going on. My replacement from Amazon will be here Tuesday so I'll have time to mess with both and see if its the charger or what. Currently my turbocharging is hit or miss.
DrearierJester1 said:
How do we determine if turbo charger is ongoing? I mean are there any indication? Coz when I plug in the TurboCharger that comes with it, sometimes TurboPower Connected shows at the bottom of the screen, sometimes not. Then when I check it on the Status, it says Charging over USB, not Charging over AC? Could be that my unit is defective? perhaps the charger? or the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have this issue sometimes to. So if I need to know if im charging at turbo I use an app from the app store to see if states I'm turbo Charging or not. In the Charging screen it will say "normal or Turbo"
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.gombosdev.ampere
DrearierJester1 said:
How do we determine if turbo charger is ongoing? I mean are there any indication? Coz when I plug in the TurboCharger that comes with it, sometimes TurboPower Connected shows at the bottom of the screen, sometimes not. Then when I check it on the Status, it says Charging over USB, not Charging over AC? Could be that my unit is defective? perhaps the charger? or the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can use a USB voltage/current indicator device to see it directly. I use one that displays voltage and current simultaneously, it cost about $10 on Amazon.
The Qualcomm QC 2.0 (which Motorola terms "TurboPower) spec is 5, 9, 12, and 20 volts, with up to 2 amps plus at each voltage. The QC 2.0 chargers I've tested including the Motorola charger included with the XT1575, range up to 9V and about 2+ A at 9V, with the higher voltage/amperage when battery is discharged to a lower SoC.. Haven't seen 12V or 20V, I think those only come into play when battery is discharged to nearly zero SoC.
Agree the reason the included charger has cable attached may be to ensure adequate wire gage. Too-thin wire will increase voltage drop across cable thus lengthening charge time in higher power modes. But the design here uses higher voltage to keep current down around the same 2A max current of USB 2.0 chargers, so cable heat will not be a problem with any old USB cable.
I will attest to the benefit of QC 2.0. I thought it was a useless gimmick until I started using it. It does effectively compensate for mediocre battery capacity.
My "Turbo Charging" icon displays properly, but doesn't charge very quickly if connected to a cheap extension cord.
Plugged into the wall, the charging Stull doesn't impress me that much
Sent from my XT1575 using Tapatalk
DrearierJester1 said:
How do we determine if turbo charger is ongoing? I mean are there any indication? Coz when I plug in the TurboCharger that comes with it, sometimes TurboPower Connected shows at the bottom of the screen, sometimes not. Then when I check it on the Status, it says Charging over USB, not Charging over AC? Could be that my unit is defective? perhaps the charger? or the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's defective. Call moto they will replace it for free. Just have to send copy of purchase receipt. Had the same issue.
The charge rate depends on how discharged the battery is when connected to charge.
More discharged (lower SoC, State of Charge) will drive a higher charge rate.
As to the difference between this Motorola TurboPower (aka Qualcomm Quick Charge 2.0), vs. other phones:
I've measured up to 1.4 amps at 5V nominal on other phones, that is about 9 watts charging power. That is max charge rate, with a very discharged battery. As the battery charges up closer to fully charged, the charge rate (power) is reduced. Total charging time from fully discharged to fully charged would be about 4-5 hours, give or take, for a typical cellphone battery.
For comparison, the QC 2.0 measurements I made with the MXPE: Up to 2.2 amps at 9V nominal with a phone battery discharged to about 40-50%. That works out to about 20 watts charging power. As with other Li-Ion battery charging systems, this also declines as the battery approaches fully charged. Total time to charge, from fully discharged to fully charged will be about 2-3 hours, give or take.
So the marketing claims about QC 2.0 are about right: A 75% improvement over conventional charging systems.
The biggest gains come when charging batteries discharged to lower SoC. If you are comparing charge rate/time of batteries discharged to only, say, 70-80%, you will not see as much of a difference with QC 2.0.
I'm not a QC 2.0 marketing shill, mind you. I pretty much ignored it, before buying the phone. But for this phone, QC 2.0 actually does a good job to compensate for the mediocre battery. I can run the battery down to 40-50%, put it on QC 2.0 charger in my car for my 30 minute commute, and it is charged to around 80+% when I arrive at my destination. There are a lot of QC 2.0 certified aftermarket chargers out there too, Qualcomm did a lot of work on the front end as part of bringing it to market. (Just make sure any AC charger is UL listed or equivalent, if you care about safety.
Caveats on cables: The cable does make a difference at higher charge rates. Thinner gage wire will impose a greater voltage drop at higher current, this will reduce power and thus increase charge time.
Typical USB cables are AWG 26-28. You can buy 20, 22, and 24 AWG USB cables. Some cables advertise heavier (22-24) gage wire for the power leads with standard (26-28) gage wire for the data leads. The aftermarket QC 2.0 AC chargers I bought listed their included cables as 20 gage.
Get the heavier gage if you want full QC 2.0 charging.
soufdallas said:
I still have my galaxy s6 nexus charger that is a fast charging and it seems to work fine with turbo charging
Sent from my LG-H345 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to check did you use S6 original charger ? And does it charge same with the turbo power charger provided by moto?
Sent from my Moto X Pure (2015) via Tapatalk