Related
Yesterday my wifes friend got a g2 .I took a look at it and was like this is cool , then I started using it. I didn't know that a g2 had almost as much, if not more lag than a stock vibrant .nerov3 put that g2 to shame. The owner of said g2 was like why is my phone so slow? I was like its a combo of it being slow, and mine being super fast she went to t mobile today and got a vibrant!!! stating the only thing she will miss is the flash camera. now ive got to mod her phone thank goodness for xda and tw !!
Nerov3 voodoo
willsnews said:
Yesterday my wifes friend got a g2 .I took a look at it and was like this is cool , then I started using it. I didn't know that a g2 had almost as much, if not more lag than a stock vibrant .nerov3 put that g2 to shame. The owner of said g2 was like why is my phone so slow? I was like its a combo of it being slow, and mine being super fast she went to t mobile today and got a vibrant!!! stating the only thing she will miss is the flash camera. now ive got to mod her phone thank goodness for xda and tw !!
Nerov3 voodoo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha cool story, now she can be.. PART OF THE GANG.
I did the. Same thing with the guys at work my vibrant running auxora 2. 2 we tried a LG optimis. A droid x and an evo. My vibrant won loaded and played YouTube videos faster opened random apps faster just fooling around but my vibrant was fastest
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
My friends Evo beat mine at playing youtube videos by a split milla-second.
Besides that vibrant tied up with a Droid X
She'll thank you even more when the hinge of the g2 becomes loose after a month
That's funny. I guess that's what happens when you head over to the vibrant forums...
Sent from my HTC Vision using XDA App
I thought the G2 is better phone since the processor is better... I mean stock g2 is not better than Vibrant but once rooted g2 is better
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
dan12288 said:
I thought the G2 is better phone since the processor is better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better how?
dan12288 said:
I thought the G2 is better phone since the processor is better... I mean stock g2 is not better than Vibrant but once rooted g2 is better
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Incorrect.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I've held my sisters g2 and my cousins verizon droid 2 next to my rooted and lagfixed vibrant to compare speeds. My vibrant would load pages just as fast and most times faster than both. Then I compared the speeds of those other 2 phones to my wifes stock vibrant and got the same results. I would run the speed test app on the g2 and my vibrant at the same time and the g2 would score the higher number every time. You would think it being an hspa+ phone it would be quicker with the web browsing but it is just not the case. Those phones are nice phones as well and i wouldn't mind having them, but there is some misinformation going around the interwebs, especially when they start using tests like quadrant standard and the speed test app to measure performance. When it comes to real world use, the vibrant is just as good.
Ar318307 said:
Incorrect.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm acutally go to the G2 forums and they have stable 1.8GHz kernals for the phone
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
beren28 said:
Better how?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Probably because 2.2 is optimized for the Snapdragon, while we have the hummingbird. However, 2.3 fixes all that and hummingbird is superior to snapdragon in 2.3
shadrock said:
Ummm acutally go to the G2 forums and they have stable 1.8GHz kernals for the phone
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How's that battery life over clocked at 1. 8? Did you compare that?
Vibrant Axura 2.2 Voodoo 5 JL5 via the XDA app
I'm just saying this is what happened
Nerov3 voodoo
12paq said:
How's that battery life over clocked at 1. 8? Did you compare that?
Vibrant Axura 2.2 Voodoo 5 JL5 via the XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well.. No i guess you got me there lol. I was just backing up the guy who said the G2 had a better processor
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
shadrock said:
Well.. No i guess you got me there lol. I was just backing up the guy who said the G2 had a better processor
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not better just more overclockable
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
And how about some graphics tests. As far as I know our gpu is the best there is as of now. And I too have ran my nero v3 against an evo. An epic and my wifes mt4g. The one that came close to my speed opening apps and pages was the mt4g cuz I loaded cm6 on it lol
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
robavila721 said:
And how about some graphics tests. As far as I know our gpu is the best there is as of now. And I too have ran my nero v3 against an evo. An epic and my wifes mt4g. The one that came close to my speed opening apps and pages was the mt4g cuz I loaded cm6 on it lol
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You did know that the epic has the same gpu as the vibrant right?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
anthonys2r said:
Probably because 2.2 is optimized for the Snapdragon, while we have the hummingbird. However, 2.3 fixes all that and hummingbird is superior to snapdragon in 2.3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know man, Nexus One running GB is still pumping over 40 MFLOPS in Linpack vs what like 15 on Nexus S
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMY8iDucg6c
FF to 2:10
Alex530 said:
You did know that the epic has the same gpu as the vibrant right?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I do, but the guy had it stock, he was complaining that it would freeze a lot
Ok so I know they share processors and are quite similar so will our phones ever be capable of this...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtube_gdata_player&v=GpLju9341v8
I know quadrant is flawed towards some devices, I'm not saying anything about that, I have my shift at 1.8 and I'm only pulling 2100...
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
On Evervolv (AOSP GB) I can pull 2700 at 1.8.
EDIT: Just pulled 2823. Have faith, the Shift will dominate
^ Shift Faced
Giggity
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
What SetCPU settings are you guys running? I've tried multiple governors and freq combos (I haven't locked or rebooted once with max 1.8) but can't even break 1900 in quadrant! I'm using the latest free version of quadrant available on the market if that matters.
I'm jealous of everyone else's reported scores =( My FPS also don't seem to have improved much over stock in the graphics benchs.
Fps won't change much
Sent from my PG06100 using XDA App
nice nice nice
The newest Qualcomm mobile web bench Vellamo, I'd say something new to try, I got 640 on 1.8.3 (froyo)
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
I got 945 on my Galaxy Tab 10.1
Got 722 in GB
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
I got 610 on 1.8.3. Its shame that samsung's tab carries the same core and ram, and still navigates much, much better, even if you disconsider this benchmark.
KingKuba13 said:
This benchmark is crap and inaccurate.
Just stick to sunspider and browsermark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
ofek said:
Because our phone failed in this test while SGS2 scores 940~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you ever used an GS2 and an Atrix side by side? I love our phone man, but there's a reason why the GS2 is 20% more expensive on some countries than the Atrix with it's packed-to-full box and the lapdock together.
slimslim said:
Why is that?
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
KingKuba13 said:
Go to the specific sunspider javascript test with it, which you can score 2200-4000 ms, meanwhile HTC sensation does 6000ms. Lower is better, btw.
The benchmark will still give you a lower score for it compared to the sensation.
So if all these phones are beating Atrix in sunspider/javascript they should be getting scores in the 1000-3000ms easily right......LOL
Great job Qualcomm, you are beyond a joke again. Trying to make your little turds Evo3d/Sensation look a little less pathetic when they get crushed in real web benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
inoskedu8o8 said:
Try using cf bench from the market. My evo3d smacks my atrix.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Looks like LG 2x with custom roms is killing this benchmark. 2000 +
KingKuba13 said:
Try using smart bench from the market....
Is your evo3d running @1.8ghz, doubt it beats Atrix with GB.
Evo smacks nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No it's running stock. It does beat atrix with cf bench. Atrix beats it with quadrant though. Guys in the evo3d forum that are overclocked at 1.5 are smacking the sgs2 with cf bench. What does this mean in real world performance? Absolutely nothing. C'mon man I thought you knew.
Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk
Ok guys I think I have figured out why the Samsung Vibrant has been getting no support in terms of updates from anyone including samfirmware.com! If you think about it all other Galaxy S phones and the Galaxy S 4G (Or Vibrant 4G) has had lots of leaks and even ETA's for updates except our Vibrant. Why? Simple. T-Mobile is doing what they tried to do for Froyo! There going to bring updates and bugfixes to the Vibrant 4G first alongside the other Galaxy S devices and use it as another justification to purchase that phone, then a couple months later or perhaps not at all the OG Vibrant might get some bug fixes and a Gingerbread update!
Please reply what you guys think on either this post or your theory on why the last leak we got was KB5 back in Feburary.
The Tech Game said:
Ok guys I think I have figured out why the Samsung Vibrant has been getting no support in terms of updates from anyone including samfirmware.com! If you think about it all other Galaxy S phones and the Galaxy S 4G (Or Vibrant 4G) has had lots of leaks and even ETA's for updates except our Vibrant. Why? Simple. T-Mobile is doing what they tried to do for Froyo! There going to bring updates and bugfixes to the Vibrant 4G first alongside the other Galaxy S devices and use it as another justification to purchase that phone, then a couple months later or perhaps not at all the OG Vibrant might get some bug fixes and a Gingerbread update!
Please reply what you guys think on either this post or your theory on why the last leak we got was KB5 back in Feburary.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know but i read something today that said google stepped in and now is sending updates to all phones on ATT which means folks who had older phones will get upgraded as well.. here is the article - http://socialbarrel.com/google-delivers-android-2-3-gingerbread-to-att-devices/11881/
I hope they do the same for T-mobile and help customers like us with samsung (vibrant and behold ) users alike..
MadNosf said:
I hope they do the same for T-mobile and help customers like us with samsung (vibrant and behold ) users alike..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll keep my fingers crossed.
__________________
Phone: Samsung Vibrant
ROM: Phiremod V3.0.1
Kernel: Bali-X 1.2
Modem: KB5
im gonna buttrape tmobile
Bleh.... I'll just buy my answer to this problem: Hello, nexus prime!
I don't care much 4 dah update I just feel bad 4 dah average Joe cuz I remember how bad an laggy 2.1 was but some people have had better experiences with it
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
Why isn't there "No more Samsung/ T-mobile" this time for the gingerbread?
i wish one of the dev can port the vibrant 4g 2.3 or 2.4 Rom to the vibrant i have been using the vibrant 4g with 2.3 and it is not bad at all it work real good better than most of the 2.3 or 2.4 Rom out there.
Could someone explain to me in plain English the big deal with 2.3 /2.4? I get 2.1 to 2.2 gave us flash... what's the big deal with the new ver?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
accordex said:
Could someone explain to me in plain English the big deal with 2.3 /2.4? I get 2.1 to 2.2 gave us flash... what's the big deal with the new ver?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better optimization for hummingbird CPU.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
geoffcorey said:
Better optimization for hummingbird CPU.
OK.. same with 2.1 to 2.2 ...could you really tell? No...
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
accordex said:
Could someone explain to me in plain English the big deal with 2.3 /2.4? I get 2.1 to 2.2 gave us flash... what's the big deal with the new ver?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Besides the crt animation, an average user wouldn't notice the difference. I like the multitasking of gingerbread.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
accordex said:
-your comment about 2.1 to 2.2-
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, 2.1 to 2.2 optimized snapdragon cpus. Hummingbird got hardly any jump. Gb fixed that.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
+1 to hummingbird optimization.
TW4/4.5 also runs smoother on GB than Froyo (4/4.5 is a HUGE plus over the stock TW)
Some apps also required 2.3 (such as Netflix before they updated it to allow froyo)
CRT
probably more than I can't think off my head right now
edit: heres a pretty good comprehensive list and description
http://developer.android.com/sdk/android-2.3-highlights.html
we will reap the full benefits once we get an official 2.3 release (accompanied with source) so our talented devs optimize 2.3 for us.
geoffcorey said:
No, 2.1 to 2.2 optimized snapdragon cpus. Hummingbird got hardly any jump. Gb fixed that.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did it? I've seen no great evidence of this on the international S's official GB
geoffcorey said:
Better optimization for hummingbird CPU.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Only on aosp based 2.3 roms
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I was tired of my vibrants jumpy inconsistent gps so got myself a Galaxy S 4G and installed the latest KG4 GB. The stock GB runs smoother than Cynogenmod for vibrant.
GB may be a minor upgrade but its a major upgrade for us due to hummingbird optimizations. Also the battery life is MUCH better on GB.
TouchWiz speed only matters for those who choose to use it
I use GO Launcher EX and love it.
Free, fast, beautiful, and more features than TW.
I was hoping tmobile was going the way of att with gb updates...in the mean time, new phone!. Haven't decided which yet though
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA Premium App
masterotaku said:
Did it? I've seen no great evidence of this on the international S's official GB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As much as I hate to reference quadrants, GB boosted the CPU scores portion of the test significantly for the SGS
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
This is still laughable to me. Still, quadrant was updated to work well with ICS. This is my score with cm7 gingerbread @1.440 ghz. Why am I above a galaxy nexus? Hmm.. :trollface:
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My t-prime got 4500
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
Esteway.619 said:
Hahaha your funny here's my galaxy nexus. Try to beat that lol stock rooted with 13.5ghz over clock
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
RushAOZ said:
Haha what I meant to say is, why am I above a gnex? Oh yea, this benchmark is FLAWED!! lol
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hahaha
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
My result with CM9 v2.1, T132-ICS-CM9 Kernel and CPU set to 200-1000 MHz, ondemand: 2257.
Of course the NS can't mess with an GN, but i'm still impressed how much performance you can gain with custom-roms and -kernels.
I'm running gingerbread deck and the matrix kernel with an overclock to 1.2...(not live oc) and got a score of sound 2966. Hopefully the official 4G build gets ics performance up a little more. I find it hard to believe my device on GB out preforms a galaxy nexus by so much...
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
How are you guys viewing your results? Mine tells me that the next update will include the result browser due to different scores in this version?
you have to except the new shady test result message at the end of the test
im sorry, i really couldnt resist. the sight of this thread to me was like a cat sensing catnip
a cm9 kang with trinity t144, at 1.44ghz
Use to get 3000... sad times....
Nexus S (GSM i9020a)
CM9 Kang (Build 6 of 2.1)
Eugene's Kernel (Speedy-7)
OC 800/100 (conservative)
demo23019 said:
Lol nice update like how they slapped a galaxy tab score with io hack at top to make this crap look legit.
even gpu score is whacked considering GN has same sgx540 with a higher clock
yet the stock NS GPU scores higher
At least now you can distinguish actual hardware scores from IO.and supports dualcore.
about the only legit thing to go by in this benchmark is the CPU
anyways enough *****ing
here is my score without any io minpluation
on Eugen's speedy 7 1.44/performance/SIO/65FPS refresh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Very true. More than 2.5 times the Res.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
The power vr540 is a beast.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Sgx540*
Sorry, I'm drunk.
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Rem3Dy said:
you forget the galaxy nexus has a lot more pixels to push.....
Sent from my Nexus S 4G using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup you're right forgot about that
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
Trintity
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So did I, never could determine why...
ljordan2 said:
What the heck? I am getting better scores with Trintity(880/220, conservative) than SG's kernel(1100/200, performance).
SG's kernel
View attachment 901627
Trintity
View attachment 901628
I know that benchmark is nothing but still it is weird.
Sent from my Nexus S using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kooskoos1814 said:
So did I, never could determine why...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont let the 880mhz in trinity teuv fool you, its as fast as many 1.2ghz kernels.