progress on 1.6 ghz overclock - Vibrant General

I know team whiskey has made a kernel to overclock the vibrant to 1.6 ghz already but the kernel is malfunctioning. Now that it has been scrapped is there any more progress on this overclock? The mytouch 4g is beating us at 1.7 ghz!

The Hummingbird cpu doesn't have the overclocking head room that the Scorpion cpu does. I doubt there will be a kernel with a real 1.6ghz stable clock for a long time if ever.
Sent from my SGS Vibrant.

Doesn't an OC that high murder the battery?

Dammit2Hell said:
Doesn't an OC that high murder the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It does on my phone.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Dammit2Hell said:
Doesn't an OC that high murder the battery?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would probably worry more about my CPU dying prematurely due to the higher voltage and amp passing through it than the replaceable battery.

is it even necessary to have such a high overclock besides for e-bragging on a cellphone (lol) ?

anthonys2r said:
is it even necessary to have such a high overclock besides for e-bragging on a cellphone (lol) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hilarious but true lol
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

I notice a performance increase going from 1ghz to 1.2

tissimo said:
The Hummingbird cpu doesn't have the overclocking head room that the Scorpion cpu does. I doubt there will be a kernel with a real 1.6ghz stable clock for a long time if ever.
Sent from my SGS Vibrant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah.. I have to agree with the other guy, they are two diff processors.

I don't think we're going to need a 1.6 OCed. Well for me all i need is my Master's Axura.

Tynen said:
I notice a performance increase going from 1ghz to 1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is placebo effect.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

Depends where he sees the increase. With a 1.2ghz I notice an increase in 3d frame rates. I don't think there where any gpu tweaks in the kernel, just the gpu is limited by the cpu.
Sent from my SGS Vibrant.

Related

Linpack score of 16mflops

What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
parmend said:
What's the average score for a evo on cm7 .
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tested at 41.8
Yeah, I would say avg is anywhere from 35 to 42, depending on clock speed. What happens if you run it again right after a couple times?
One time I got and 8, and I was like, WTF? Ran it again and got a 38.
Thanks, I just ran it and it still 16-18. Does the kernal matter. I'm on timat 3.3.7
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
yeah on cm7 I got 40 give or take.
stock sense is like 32 for me and overclocked to 1.2ghz i get 38-39.
bfs kernels were hit or mis on my EVO. Kinda clunky on mine.
I'f you're getting low linpack scores try switching from smartass to conservative(just to score higher). Also I get an average of 41 with my phone clocked at 1190.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA Premium App
Specs in sig, I just got 43.261, average is 42-44.
How do you check?
Arnezie said:
How do you check?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download linpack from the market
mattykinsx said:
Download linpack from the market
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
32.059
Stock rooted rom
25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?
39.6
Mik 4.61
Netarchty-toastmod 4.3.1
Setcpu CPU 1190MHZ Very Stable
Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
parmend said:
Quadrant vs linpack? Which one is more important?
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would say definitely linpack. Quadrant is not consistent.
you can get bad scores if you have to many services running. i get 33-35 stock non rooted hw 004. got up to 44+ on my old hw 002(got the restart when overheated problem) when 2.2 first came out, completely stock but since then they have added alot of services that slow it down
if the media scanner is running. i get about 22. so check that in the services if you are getting bad scores
Fricksta said:
25.59 Destroyed v2 how do i improve that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Need more details. What kernel, what CPU settings, etc. I was getting 38-40 on d2.
Just got 40.75 on cm7 with dark horse theme and sz 2.0.0 ondemand 1190
The Linpack app also does not pull enough from CPU to ramp the CPU to max. Set your minimum CPU to the same as your max, run linpack then lower your minimum CPU speed, Interactive is best governor to use for this
all these tests are for is braggin rights...these scores will not be like, oh check it out, my browser loads .3 seconds quicker bc i got 3 more mflops...get out of hee, find a rom you like, and use it, most of them are very good. There is not one rom on this site that blows away the competetion, they are all very very very similiar in speed, nuff said

Post your highest stable overclock thread!

We all need one and the Xperia Play hasn't got one, so I thought I'd start one for you guys.
On my Xperia Play R800i I'm happily running at 1.8ghz and I'm considering pushing it further. How are you guys doing?
1.5-1.6 here... I'm trying to push it so I can get full speed on TigerMAME with sound, and I'm not really noticing any improvement. Maybe I need to look at trying out some different governers.
Thought everyone's went to 2.0ghz stable, i think it could do more tbh
Well anyway mine is 2ghz stable using the smartass governer
Using what to overclock? Does the Play have an OC kernel stock, or have you done something else to it? I'm a noob with the Play so I haven't discovered all the goodies yet.
netizenmt said:
Using what to overclock? Does the Play have an OC kernel stock, or have you done something else to it? I'm a noob with the Play so I haven't discovered all the goodies yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use doomlord kernel to enable OC, i have 1.2 ghz, i don't want to make it higher, because it will decrease my hardware lifetime, coz I love my xplay...
regards
1.7 ghz fine and dandy probably could go higher but no point really
Sent from my R800i using XDA App
dataDave said:
1.5-1.6 here... I'm trying to push it so I can get full speed on TigerMAME with sound, and I'm not really noticing any improvement. Maybe I need to look at trying out some different governers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What games are you having issues with? I am using TigerArcade 2.2.1-FULL on the stock kernel and not noticed any sound issues
i think almost everyone gets 2.0ghz stable, but i run 1.6 ghz. mainly because the improvement 2hz is next to nothing (about 4%-ish on fpsece) and it makes my phone warm when playing.
How did u enable the "3d sweep panorama" is this some ROM specific or is there an APK available?
m2maddy said:
How did u enable the "3d sweep panorama" is this some ROM specific or is there an APK available?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Instead of diverting from the topic of this thread, please either make a new thread or better yet use the "search" feature. You will find that there is no way to port the panorama app
jacklebott said:
Instead of diverting from the topic of this thread, please either make a new thread or better yet use the "search" feature. You will find that there is no way to port the panorama app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol, there is one in this web, but I forget the exactly, there is someone port panorama for xplay, but it's only full working in 2.3.2...
search it, and good luck
Hi
Mine only overclocks to 1.5 ghz which is annoying any way to make it go higher
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
pitamus said:
Hi
Mine only overclocks to 1.5 ghz which is annoying any way to make it go higher
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
flash doomlords 2.0ghz kernel
Shaun27 said:
flash doomlords 2.0ghz kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No I mean mine crashes at 1.6 any help
Sent from my R800i using xda premium
pitamus said:
No I mean mine crashes at 1.6 any help
Sent from my R800i using xda premium[/
it's pot luck really 1 chip mite oc to 2.0ghz while another mite only oc to 1.3ghz. Its not really worth pushing it any more than what your running in my opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shaun27 said:
pitamus said:
No I mean mine crashes at 1.6 any help
Sent from my R800i using xda premium[/
it's pot luck really 1 chip mite oc to 2.0ghz while another mite only oc to 1.3ghz. Its not really worth pushing it any more than what your running in my opinion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wanna see how far I can push the mine, it easily gets to 2ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2.0 GHz stable
Ljanmi said:
2.0 GHz stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what voltages do you guys use? doesn't the phone get hell-ish hot @ such speeds !! 2ghz i mean come on....
skyboyextreme said:
what voltages do you guys use? doesn't the phone get hell-ish hot @ such speeds !! 2ghz i mean come on....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, it does get like a hot potato in your palms but it's only for testing purposes...
you can see what voltages I'm using
Ljanmi said:
yeah, it does get like a hot potato in your palms but it's only for testing purposes...
you can see what voltages I'm using
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
darn 1525 i wouldn't even touch 1.35 on my neo i consider it extremely harmful to go over 1.35 !
so yea test 2ghz just for the brag rights lol

Cm7 cpu quadrant

How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think he meant inferior CPU and superior i/o.
HMZX said:
um... your I/O bar is the biggest.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
=JKT= said:
How come the cpu seems so slow in quadrant standard tests.... Heck, my desire z (800mhz single core) blew through the cpu component of the test faster...This result is typical of all Cm7 roms I've tried. Below my result is... Surprise! Atrix 4g, with superior cpu rating, but inferior i/o. I find this all kind of counter intuitive...
Any insights?
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you underclocked?
i got double your cpu score on 1.45ghz
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Managed to get 4.5k quadrant score at 1.45 on the older builds. 4K with 1.3ghz
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
I guess I wasn't clear enough lol
My phone was at stock 1ghz. This was to compare objectively to the bar below the "your device" bar, which was entitled "atrix 4g" which had, yes, superior cpu and inferior i/o scores.
Of course you will get better scores overclocked to 1.45 ghz. Try to understand what I'm asking about. I'll ask more clearly.
Why does a custom rom appear to get a worse cpu score than stock at same clock rate? Shouldn't it be equal or greater?
squee666 said:
Its because cm7 doesn't initialize both cousin in quadrant. Try it on cm9 or cm10 CPU doubles.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that true? System panel gives independent readouts of the load on each core and they seem to both be working. But if they don't both work in quadrant that would explain it all =) (except why quadrant lol)
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Score I got at 1.3ghz faux kernel on am older version of cm9. Yea quadrant reads that there are 2 cores. Just does not use them properly.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Thanks guys. That does seem to be the issue. Here is a score @ 1gHz with mokee os. Looks pretty obvious that both cores are working here:
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
squee666 said:
Lol its not obvious at all the green bar is I/o mokee is cm7 based you should try a cm9 or cm10 based rom to see CPU difference.
Sent from Moto Atrix 4g on Neutrino 2.91
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look at my blue (ie cpu) bar in this image compared to the image in my first post. I believe it is, in fact, quite obvious. Lol... At least that something is significantly improved cpu-wise...
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app

My Galaxy S3 Quadrant Score : 8727 Really!.

I have not seen the wrong friends .. I developed a new missile with rum was like the Galaxy s3. We have i3 CPU processor equivalent notebooks.
Country : Turkey - Manisa
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Faked.
This thread ****ing sucks.
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Showing off fake does not make you feel any better.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
2 posts in 4 years @[email protected] Says a lot really LOL
Drakenfall said:
Well, there is an app that boosts quadrant score, so quadrant isn´t reliable, at least to show off in the internet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
paintball23456 said:
unless you can tell us what cpu, gpu speed this is and PROVE you haven't got a quadrant booster installed..... this is fake.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Scores with quadrant are equal to none. Its unreliable and even if you get a high or low score it says nothing about your phone
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
nfsmw_gr said:
Not that i don't think this is fake,but quadrant booster boosts the io points by loading the app's data into ram so it'll past the database read/write at blazingly fast speed.
If you look at the chart you'll see the green section(the io) is at normal level,so he's not using this.
But if you look at the blue section(the cpu) you'll see that these scores are skyrocketed!
So he's overclocked to hell this phone,or he's just using an optimus g or something that has this kind of cpu performance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Lol this is mine overclocked to 1.6 ghz..... 6264 quadrant...so his score is fake :beer:
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
OZAN4545 said:
cpu 1.7 ghz my kernel kayakernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
viking37 said:
Hi,
And can you share your kernel?
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
78cortina said:
Just look in original development bud. Siyah kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hum... Because kayakernel = Siyah kernel... ??? :what: weird
And thanks I know Siyah kernel...
After that if people can't write right a kernel name...
This CPU score of about 28 000 at 1.7 Ghz, even with Siyah kernel, how?, ROM, other tweaks, settings?
I realy don't know how it's possible... Something is strange.
I would like to see an Antutu score, Cf-Bench and Vellamo...
Sent from my HTC Sensation Z710e using xda app-developers app
Please share all relevant info please fill in the gaps
ROM:
KERNEL: SIYAH
CPU: 1.7
GPU steps:
Stweaks config:
Just so others can test this for themselves
im what Willis was talking about
.........7 inches
.......ooooooops, my apologies, I thought you said " compare d*ck size"
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Bilux said:
Yeah, it's really? Show me a video...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
slaphead20 said:
^^^....if you are talking to me....then NO!....I won't show you a video!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can get similar videos all over the net though
《posted from samsung rom》
i think the score.makes sense. he is using the older version of.quadrant
Sent from my GT-N7100 using xda premium
Tweaked system settings, no big deal good for running one program and nothing else. Like running something with a priority of realtime in Windows.
Pump the CPU to stay at 1.7, run Quadrant exit out go to console raise its nice priority etc, go back and bingo nice big scores!
What's the point of this post, to show all you can use System Tuner or scripts or the console?

[dev]zimage avalible overclocked kernel [update19-08-2013]

development discontinued due to certain comments
update19-08-2013:
if anyone wants to compile theyr own kernel use this git (its from @neldar) --->https://github.com/neldar/buildenv_gt-i8190
You cant compare S3, S2 and S3 mini gpus, our device has only one core mali400 and S3 and S2 have multi core gpu.
About CPU overclock, some devs said that its dangerous to overclock novathor chipsets, but i think we could try and push frequency a little bit without raising voltage, then it should be harmless, but also it probably wouldnt be a much higher clock.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
QuanticZero97 said:
You cant compare S3, S2 and S3 mini gpus, our device has only one core mali400 and S3 and S2 have multi core gpu.
About CPU overclock, some devs said that its dangerous to overclock novathor chipsets, but i think we could try and push frequency a little bit without raising voltage, then it should be harmless, but also it probably wouldnt be a much higher clock.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
anyway that should boost our performance.
QuanticZero97 said:
You cant compare S3, S2 and S3 mini gpus, our device has only one core mali400 and S3 and S2 have multi core gpu.
About CPU overclock, some devs said that its dangerous to overclock novathor chipsets, but i think we could try and push frequency a little bit without raising voltage, then it should be harmless, but also it probably wouldnt be a much higher clock.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you sure about only one core?
OS Android OS, v4.1 (Jelly Bean)
Chipset NovaThor U8420
CPU 1 GHz dual-core Cortex-A9
GPU Mali-400
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
and also http://www.samsung.com/africa_en/consumer/mobile-phone/mobile-phone/smart-phone/GT-I8190MBAXFA-spec
looks like it's a dual core to me
as far as overclocking goes
i am happy with the performance of the phone after a few tweaks and mods done without overclocking things
up.SGS3 mini-Mali-400 have only one core gpu
SGS3 -Mali- 400MP4 have qwad core gpu
its that deference
kris555777 said:
up.SGS3 mini-Mali-400 have only one core gpu
SGS3 -Mali- 400MP4 have qwad core gpu
its that deference
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is correct.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
Main Thread Updated
I've read that 1.2Ghz is MAX, so 1.15 is probably what we can get and still be stable.
Not that I need it, but every device should have a OC kernel
Hope it can be done. Thanks for your information.
overcloking is always dangerous buth we need it device is slow and samsung ripped us off
Databorg said:
overcloking is always dangerous buth we need it device is slow and samsung ripped us off
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It isnt dangerous if you dont raise voltage.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
QuanticZero97 said:
It isnt dangerous if you dont raise voltage.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fact but you will shorten the life time of the cpu and there's always a risk of overheating the cpu.
Databorg said:
fact but you will shorten the life time of the cpu and there's always a risk of overheating the cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well overclocking is all about trial and error, if it overheats, you're obviously going to turn the clocks down
Databorg said:
fact but you will shorten the life time of the cpu and there's always a risk of overheating the cpu.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it cannot overheat if you dont raise voltage, if current voltage isnt enough the device will crash, reboot and nothing more. About shortening the cpu life time, im not sure, but previously i had a device that was overclocked from 1000MHz to 1500MHz with not that big voltage raising and in my case, voltage that was minimal for cpu to run on 1200 was enough for it to run on 1500. Anyways, my point is that we can try to oc our device as far as it goes with current voltage to achieve a more performance, if it doesnt go up, still ok, we tried. @op when you make that kernel, please post it so i can test it out
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
can someone help me?
PTGamer said:
can someone help me?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should edit the op and write what you need help with/your progress, maybe somebody will know, just suggesting
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
QuanticZero97 said:
You should edit the op and write what you need help with/your progress, maybe somebody will know, just suggesting
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1st post updated
This should be moved to the development forum.. Looking good though, we need more kernel developers
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk 2
modded kernel released.
nice work downloading now, il give it a try
Databorg said:
nice work downloading now, il give it a try
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is AOSP 4.2.2 supported?

Categories

Resources