Database Users

Samsung Epic 2.2 foyo leak benchmarks

Just thought i'd try and find out what everyone's benchmarks are. And how your daily use is.
Daily usage for me is great there is a little bit of lag on auto rotate, I'm guessing that is why they did not use touchwiz 3.0 in the first place wen the epic came out. And bout the gps issue, I don't really use gps much at all so it is not a concern for me right now. My neocore is around 55fps, linpack is around 20 mflops, benchmarkpi is around 1200 and the unreliable quadrant is around 1024. I say unreliable because I have setcpu at 100-1ghz conservative, and my quadrant is reading my cpu at around 1300. Samsung epic. 2.2 froyo. benchmark tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

Neocore was 55.7
Linpack was 13.something MFlops in 6 seconds
I feel like those should be higher
Sent from my SPH-D700 using XDA App

I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33

dito33 said:
I have a filling that setcpu is only a gimmick doing nothing.
dito33
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well if the kernel supports 1300 maybe thats why quadrant sees it that way...As for setcpu you need an overclocked kernel that supports higher clocks,but this is also used to aquire better battery life...And it does work,period.

Nero 2 with Super I/O Kernel, Yes or No?

will it make difference?

I just finished my titanium restore, but it's smooth so far.
A lot of nice little touches. And Quadrant says 1193 so that ain't bad.

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Runnin nero+dow+oclf

im only running around 1000 with nero 2 and IO kernel... not sure why

willsnews said:
Runnin nero+dow+oclf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is dow?

Good god, yes, this is a terrific combination. Buttery smooth.
As for varying Quadrant scores, I find that if I kill all user apps right before running the benchmark, I'll hit in the 1200 range. Otherwise I'm only around 1000. Doesn't matter either way though, because it's silky smooth either way. I haven't even bothered with a lagfix because I don't think it's necessary. I noticed that TW tweaked the mounts so that even though it's still RFS, it's considerably faster than stock JK2 or JK6. Eugene's kernel is also the bomb and I've seen great battery and stability.
I've been waiting for a while for a Froyo build that approximates my reference setup on Eclair, which was the final Fusion w/ OC/UV (1.2ghz) with z4mod. That is the benchmark for me, and I think I've finally found it's equal in Froyo. Very happy with my Vibrant right now.

I completely agree this is the first froyo rom that matches that speed and stability I had with fusion oc'ed lag fixed.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

ionic7 said:
What is dow?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Destroyer of worlds
Runnin nero+dow+oclf

Post your Quadrant(bench) results & screens

Yeah the title is pretty much self explanatory.
Just post your Quadrant results and screens here.
Don't know what Quadrant is ? > Link
Rom : ReflexTSense 1.8 with A2SD+ = 1521
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
(i know there is an already existing thread,but it's dead,so if hoping the mods will give this one a chance)
.

quadrant scores are pretty much pointless unless its done on an untouched device ...
if you have data2sd and all the other add-ons it just falsifys the reading of the actual score if your phones runs 100% smooth and fast and stable then why bother about it , when people who have high scores mainly have slow buggy phones but coz all the add-ons they have it mostly makes the score better
but for the question my untouched desire when i 1st got it was 1760 ish
and now with redux 1.1.0 with stock kernal with ulv 875volts @ 275 mhz its 2127
with class 2 8gb generic sd
it dont mean nothing tho as i said
fast stable clean over any top score

Quadrant score - 2027.
Running miui-xj gb 1. 3. 25 D2W honeycomb themed with class 10 16gb SD 1g ext 4. Runs fast as a mofo SD bought from shop on eBay for £18. Best 18 I ever spent coming from a class 2. Haha.
Sent from my HTC Desire using XDA Premium App

[OCT20] ICS Sense Kernel OC comparison.

There are two current ICS Sense Kernel for DHD, as what I know.
BeastMode
Virtuous
I had comparison with few benchmark tools.
wifi on, mobile off, auto-sync, gps ..etc are off.
max freq selected most near to 1.5GHz (1.498 or 1.517GHz). governor performance(always Max freq). none altered.
omittted first result. these are 2nd and 3rd. also scores could vary with configurations, apps, receptions etc. this is just n00b's comparison.
While benchmarking, No FC or error found except Linpack for Android.
(found Inaccurate Result in both 3 of them not always.. wish It had no advertisement while "Testing.." ad could poison this.)
Stability and Battery Life is not in my concern.
needed to save battery from wear is highly expected.. its 2yrs old now..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
site resized that chars may visible. numbers with red are Average.
BeastMode1.5 linaro compiled by p2pjack
BeastMode1.5 gcc compiled by p2pjack
Virtuous 3.0.43 Kernel by chrisch1974

Beast Mode Kernel links are dead mate. any chance of re linking please.

Because those are posted on Sabsa Prime thread, and it was invisible for a while. Now links are back!.
Sent from my HTC Desire HD using xda app-developers app

Share your Basemark OS II result

Running on stock N, with background services tweaking....
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
This should be in the same level of Galaxy S6/Note 5
Please share yours...

No interest here? Such a bummer. I was hoping to see 2.3-2.5K from those with custom ROM.

^_^

I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.

​
Alcolawl said:
I ran this benchmark and scored worse than you running the ROM, kernel, tweaks, etc. all listed in my signature, so I decided to not even post them. I then tried running with performance governors on both clusters and the phone hotplugged the Big cluster before the benchmark was complete, ending up with even worse scores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, it could be the result of throttling. I usually run mine after idling it for a while. If I run it more than once, it will drop to 1600-1700-ish.
Thanks for sharing your experience.

Running on N DP2

Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx

Traxex_ said:
Mine is much lower with DU + Elementalx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something is eating up resources, Mem and Web are really low. Close all apps and kill background services. N has about 200-300 better score than M.
Thanks for sharing your experience.

All stock, rootless....
Broke the 2K barrier