Related
I just snagged 2 apps that if they actually work would be really cool. Both use speaker frequencies we can hear and not hear. Anti-Bug emits sounds to repel atleast mosquitos etc. and dog whistle emits sounds dogs respond to. Both have varying frequencies, most of which I can actually hear in the worst way with dog whistle. Im gonna try'n test these as best I can, Id love some help if you guys have dogs (or live amongst the worst mosquitos ever)
forgot to mention, for the dog whistle app the touch orientation is off, tap just above the whistle to activate. At 8000khz you should clearly hear the tone.
I have the dog whiste one, my sister was askin me about dog whistles because she has a puppy. So I searched one of the freeware sites, found it, and tried it out on the puppy. The upper frequencies beyond human hearing definitely work, the dog definitely noticed it. Just wish it was louder, could use it to call the dog in from outside. Never seen the mosquito one before, but I'm gonna try it out this summer, could be a very handy app if it works. Imagine being able to be outside while everybody is getting ate up and the mosquitos wont even come near you.
I've read that producing high frequency sounds to repel insects doesn't work. Can anyone here tell me otherwise ?
The dog whistle works definately. Tested My 2 dogs, my gfs dog, and my friends cat. All respond to different frequencies.
couldnt test the anti bug, little too cold last nite, today seems like its gonna be buggy, will test
My neighbor has a dog that leaves my back porch full of fleas, so I'm going to mess with the antibug tonight if they are out and report back.
I wonder how the dogs are supposed to react at the sound, do you scare them away or will they follow me?
Good to know before I try it on someones dog...
Oh boy! I'm eager to try this in the field. I conduct field trips as a volunteer naturalist in a local wildlife refuge. (The Great Salt Lake Nature Center at West Farmington Bay Waterfowl Management Area in Utah). I conduct bird watching tours and nature walks with mostly 4th graders. On these walks we encounter all manner of birds, but I give lessons on the importance the macroinvertibrates that live in the water.
As it happens, Midges and Mosquitos react to specific frequencies. I can't wait to try the antibug app while we're out being pestered by these bugs! Who knows, perhaps these kids'll will learn something and I'll be glad I could use my WinMo device for yet another field experiment. I'll report back with my findings.
We have some invasive fox in the area as well. Hopefully I'll get a reaction with the wistle too. Yay
Thanks!
dik23 said:
I've read that producing high frequency sounds to repel insects doesn't work. Can anyone here tell me otherwise ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apparently not
http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/403/do-ultrasonic-bug-repellers-work
My dad has an annoying device in his attic that apparently does drive away squirrels.
I had a high-pitch squealing drive me away, once, but then it went away after the divorce....
kierandill said:
I had a high-pitch squealing drive me away, once, but then it went away after the divorce....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same problem here. Thinking of playin the dog whistle app thru my home stereo at high volume. It should in theory keep my ex away from the house, since technically a ***** is just a female dog. Will report back with results
Haaahahaha!!! Next time instead of getting a divorce, find some broad you dont like and buy her a house!
The Dog whistle doesnt necessarily scare them away it just gets a response which seems to vary at frequency and breed.
Havent had a buggy enough day to play with the anti bug yet but there seems to be mixed ideas as to whether it even works at all, love to see if we can get some practical feedback
Careful everybody....if we actually validate the ability of this app to keep away unwanted family members (especially former ones), the developer will have such a hit on his hands that he'll be a fool not to start charging for it
Hahaha, u guys made me LOL....
But seriously, the anti bug software does not work. I was having lunch yesterday and saw a mosquito land near my plate. I launched the prog and brought my phone slowly towards it. I selected all 3 variations and even set it at 1m and 5m. I also flipped it around in case the high freq sound it's supposed to be emitting comes from the front speakers.
The phone was about 5cm away from the mosquito and it didn't even flinch. I finally reached out and squashed it with my fingers...
I have a very low to the ground car with low-profile tires.
I had my phone in my lap, and forgot it was there, got up and it just barely flopped to the ground. Flipped it over, the entire screen was shattered. It dropped maybe 12 inches from my pants to the ground.
Just a quick heads up for those who wear their phone in their crotch while they drive.
It will break from one time forgetting to take it out of your lap and into your pocket before you get out of the car. Take it from me.... FML..
Damn, that sucks bro! =[
I must be a lucky guy because I left my phone on my lap while I was driving my dad's truck (2002 Toyota Tundra), and then I forgot it was on my lap when I exited the vehicle. It landed face down, and not a scratch.
Another instance is when I was working out at the gym....again, I left my phone on my lap, and after completing my sets, I quickly stood up, and my phone hit the metal part of the equipment, and the battery door came off, and the battery flew out. Again, no scratch.
WOW!!!
I didn't know a glass screen could shatter!!!
Good info to know.
http://www.otterbox.com/htc-cases/h...cases-u.s./htc-hd2-defender-series-case-u.s./
had the same problem, dropped from a low height, screen cracked, my problem is I have a Telsta model, you have to replace screen and display (soldered together can't buy individualy) sad
eddyhsline said:
had the same problem, dropped from a low height, screen cracked, my problem is I have a Telsta model, you have to replace screen and display (soldered together can't buy individualy) sad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
most people break the screen when trying to replace it anyways. Probably better to replace both parts together.
It's all relative.
I've dropped my HD2 several times from various heights and so far the phone doesn't have a scratch on it. Once it skid down a couple of concrete stairs but miraculously survived without any damage. I guess I'm just lucky?
i use otterbox defender. in a moving car about 40km/h with window open and holding it outside when suddenly i lost grip and it felt on the asphalt.
the first thing in my mind is about the screen.
no scratch.
Was the phone on vibrate?
Just joking. Thanks for the heads up
Hey thanks guys on that otterbox thing. I might have to try that if they do have such an easy propensity to breaking.
Crazy how mine shattered so easy, and some not so easy.
If its any consolation this happened to a friend of mine - i guess its just bad luck.
people who mess with their phone whilst in charge of a vehicle deserve to crash and suffer terrible injury and / or a slow painful death, so im glad you broke your phone, just a shame you didnt cripple yourself into teh bargain. Whether making a call, or just holding it, you aren't in control of the vehicle, and deserve bad things to happen to you.
Just the opinion of someone who lost a relative to a driver who was 'just checking the time on my phone, officer'.
Glass screen can shatter? WHO WOULDA THUNK IT!?
In other related news, fish do live in the ocean and the sky is definitely blue.
I went through many of those drops with my Diamond. I put it on my crotch while talking on the headset, then got out of the car, unbeknownst that the phone is still on my crotch and BAMM! ate cement... Good thing the Diamond's screen was resistive heh. I take care of the HD2 like a baby now and always have it either on the passenger seat when i drive or put it in the phone holder.
badai said:
i use otterbox defender. in a moving car about 40km/h with window open and holding it outside when suddenly i lost grip and it felt on the asphalt.
the first thing in my mind is about the screen.
no scratch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
WHY???
+1 on what sam said too.......
samsamuel said:
people who mess with their phone whilst in charge of a vehicle deserve to crash and suffer terrible injury and / or a slow painful death, so im glad you broke your phone, just a shame you didnt cripple yourself into teh bargain. Whether making a call, or just holding it, you aren't in control of the vehicle, and deserve bad things to happen to you.
Just the opinion of someone who lost a relative to a driver who was 'just checking the time on my phone, officer'.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For your opinionated and assumptive information, I wasn't driving and talking on the phone, nor was I texting either. I pulled a pack of GUM out of my pocket and the phone had to come out in the process, so before you go wishing I DIAF, maybe you shouldn't assume things that never happen when I drive. Sorry you lost a relative, but I'm not retarded.
yep, hand off the wheel rooting in a pocket, that would count as driving without due care and attention too, except of course it's unenforecable, cos drivers have a whole set of laws all to themselves. I swing an iron bar around and accidentally hit someone and kill them, its manslaughter, a driver picks his nose and slams a half ton of metal into someone and its an unfortunate accident.
Im sorry i unloaded on you specifically, it was aimed at all car drivers (especially the pillock with his phone in hand hanging out of the car, christ, moron).
Even the (comparitively speaking) safe drivers look around, eat food (and gum!), pick their nose, fiddle with the radio, , none of these activities are safe.
How long to take your phone out of your pocket, take the gum out, unwrap it, put it in your mouth? 30 seconds? 30 seconds where you aren't in control of your car, it takes what, 3 seconds to mount the pavement, your car judders, your beloved phone leaps out of your lap, you automatically jump to grab it (studies have already shown people automatically try to grab their phones to protect them during incidents), bang, small child being scraped along the concrete leaving skin and blood in a trail behind your car. What happens? A year or so jail at the most, probably suspended.
So, again, im sorry i leaped down your throat, but for me, ANY story where something bad happens to a driver is good news.
samsamuel said:
yep, hand off the wheel rooting in a pocket, that would count as driving without due care and attention too, except of course it's unenforecable, cos drivers have a whole set of laws all to themselves. I swing an iron bar around and accidentally hit someone and kill them, its manslaughter, a driver picks his nose and slams a half ton of metal into someone and its an unfortunate accident.
Im sorry i unloaded on you specifically, it was aimed at all car drivers (especially the pillock with his phone in hand hanging out of the car, christ, moron).
Even the (comparitively speaking) safe drivers look around, eat food (and gum!), pick their nose, fiddle with the radio, , none of these activities are safe.
How long to take your phone out of your pocket, take the gum out, unwrap it, put it in your mouth? 30 seconds? 30 seconds where you aren't in control of your car, it takes what, 3 seconds to mount the pavement, your car judders, your beloved phone leaps out of your lap, you automatically jump to grab it (studies have already shown people automatically try to grab their phones to protect them during incidents), bang, small child being scraped along the concrete leaving skin and blood in a trail behind your car. What happens? A year or so jail at the most, probably suspended.
So, again, im sorry i leaped down your throat, but for me, ANY story where something bad happens to a driver is good news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been an insured driver for a decade. Never had an accident. NOR even a speeding ticket to speak of. Without taking my eyes off the road, its easy to drive with one hand and take a piece of gum out of your pocket. I don't LOOK off of the ROAD when doing this. Unfortunately some drivers do, and while one deems "safe driving" one thing, obviously another can deem it unsafe by their standards. Simply put, there are a LOT of bad drivers out there. You see them every day talking on their cell phone and using MAYBE 20% of their attention on actually PAYING ATTENTION to driving, so I get your point... but I'm sorry, taking ONE hand off the wheel while still watching the road is not unsafe, and if you cannot change the station in your car, or do simple things without getting into an accident then your license should be revoked. People take it to the extreme. I used to live in Phoenix and in the morning rush hour traffic you'd see women putting on their makeup and curling their FRIGGIN hair in the car. It boggles your mind how someone could deem THAT safe driving, because you should be BANNED from driving if you were to get pulled over or KILL someone for some stupid time-saving choice. If you've gotta do that in the car you might wanna hire someone to drive you to work every day.
So like I said I see what you're getting at and obviously, its a sensitive subject for you but I mean, 10 and 2 not 100% of the time in the car isn't gonna be unsafe if you're still prioritizing your attention & what you can, and cannot take a hand off the wheel for. ONE huge stupid is definitely TEXT/CALLING people. And the aforementioned.
So people, while this isn't a debate thread about texting and driving, moral of the story is.. don't be stupid and use your phone while you drive. I'm just the unlucky bastid that happened to have his in his lap when it shattered to the cement.
samsamuel said:
yep, hand off the wheel rooting in a pocket, that would count as driving without due care and attention too, except of course it's unenforecable, cos drivers have a whole set of laws all to themselves. I swing an iron bar around and accidentally hit someone and kill them, its manslaughter, a driver picks his nose and slams a half ton of metal into someone and its an unfortunate accident.
Im sorry i unloaded on you specifically, it was aimed at all car drivers (especially the pillock with his phone in hand hanging out of the car, christ, moron).
Even the (comparitively speaking) safe drivers look around, eat food (and gum!), pick their nose, fiddle with the radio, , none of these activities are safe.
How long to take your phone out of your pocket, take the gum out, unwrap it, put it in your mouth? 30 seconds? 30 seconds where you aren't in control of your car, it takes what, 3 seconds to mount the pavement, your car judders, your beloved phone leaps out of your lap, you automatically jump to grab it (studies have already shown people automatically try to grab their phones to protect them during incidents), bang, small child being scraped along the concrete leaving skin and blood in a trail behind your car. What happens? A year or so jail at the most, probably suspended.
So, again, im sorry i leaped down your throat, but for me, ANY story where something bad happens to a driver is good news.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Texas has a new "distracted driver" laws in effect. Basically, they can cite you for doing anything that isn't driving. I'm going to have to look it up.
guess it wasn't as far reaching as I thought:
http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=18043
nrfitchett4 said:
Texas has a new "distracted driver" laws in effect. Basically, they can cite you for doing anything that isn't driving. I'm going to have to look it up.
guess it wasn't as far reaching as I thought:
http://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=18043
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I live in Michigan, and we just started to pass laws. Lots of states have. We just got a "no texting" law. If an Officer sees you on your cell while driving you will absolutely get a ticket every time. I actually think this is a GREAT idea. Maybe we'll save some lives and when a person thinks to get on their phone while driving they'll think twice.
http://www.engadget.com/2010/10/05/hand-crank-flashlight-soldering-ben-heck-man-powered-htc-ev/
Batteries die, and when your phone has a WiMAX antenna plus dual cameras and a gigantic screen, well, those batteries tend to meet their maker sooner than later. Enter hacker extraordinaire Ben Heck with a simple and cheap solution: a hand-powered charger. Ben took an inexpensive flashlight with a crank on it, disassembled it, and ran the leads from the internal motor to his HTC EVO 4G. The exciting (or at least excited) video below is proof that it works, but we're wondering which would die first: the 4G's battery, or your arm after cranking on this thing for an hour or two.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lmao..............
Way better to use a 9V battery.
Solar chargers are abound.
pedal power.
I see this project being made portable in the sense that you could attach it to nearly any exercise device and charge while you work out... (not a devoted hard wired device that needs to remain with the exercise machine) but one you can take with you to different machines as you work out. I use solar chargers but the reasonably priced ones don't hold enough juice to fully re-power the device, so I've still got to plug it in.
I'd use this while I was sittin' on the couch watching TV or at the gym.
Hand-crank flashlight +soldering + Ben Heck = HAMSTER-powered HTC EVO 4G charger
Waaay to much time on his hands.. lmao
Now his GF is REALLY jealous of his Evo.
Sent from my PC36100 using XDA App
His laptop projects are great but this is just too much time on his hands.
Soldering two wires takes about 5 minutes. How long do you guys think the devs on here spend writing kernels or cooking ROMs? Why don't you go tell them that they have too much time on their hands?
Minjin said:
Soldering two wires takes about 5 minutes. How long do you guys think the devs on here spend writing kernels or cooking ROMs? Why don't you go tell them that they have too much time on their hands?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you really want to be cranking that thing for 2+ hours just to get a significant charge? If you do, you sir have too much time on your hands.
Comparing this to the devs who make roms/themes is like comparing apples to oranges. The execution may be less time consuming but not the application.
The devs put in their time so that all you have to do is flash and go. Ben's project requires you to get a hold of a handcrank flashlight and solder two wires to a usb cable so that you can sit on your ass for hours on end manually charging your phone. I don't care to be tied to my phone like this. But hey, if you want to sit at a park cranking your charger while you watch your lunch get cold and look like a crazy person thats on you.
I use 2 leads from my Evo, one with a zinc end, and one with copper end, plugged into a potato. It works even in the dark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtube_gdata_player&v=ufoOJfzro2c
TheBundo said:
I use 2 leads from my Evo, one with a zinc end, and one with copper end, plugged into a potato. It works even in the dark.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtube_gdata_player&v=ufoOJfzro2c
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice...now I have choice. Walk around with a sack of potatoes, nails, and pennys or build my forearm muscles while charging my phone. Decisions decisions.
At least you can eat the potatos later
TheBundo said:
At least you can eat the potatos later
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Touche'.
10chars
lovethyEVO said:
Do you really want to be cranking that thing for 2+ hours just to get a significant charge? If you do, you sir have too much time on your hands.
Comparing this to the devs who make roms/themes is like comparing apples to oranges. The execution may be less time consuming but not the application.
The devs put in their time so that all you have to do is flash and go. Ben's project requires you to get a hold of a handcrank flashlight and solder two wires to a usb cable so that you can sit on your ass for hours on end manually charging your phone. I don't care to be tied to my phone like this. But hey, if you want to sit at a park cranking your charger while you watch your lunch get cold and look like a crazy person thats on you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think Ben is expecting everyone to run out and do this mod. But if you happen to have a junky crank flashlight sitting around, it is something neat to build and throw in your bag when you go camping. Or you could just buy one of the many products that exist and is exactly the same thing. Obviously there is a market for it or they wouldn't exist.
Saying that the guy has too much time because he did something that many people have never thought of and took very little actual time is what I have a problem with. The largest value his "hack" has is that it is like a puzzle in that once you see the solution, you will always be looking at other puzzles and wondering if this one fits. In other words, it was more educational then functional and I consider that to be pretty worthwhile.
Somebody should figure out a way to implement a SHAKE WEIGHT into the hand-cranked charger idea.
Minjin said:
I don't think Ben is expecting everyone to run out and do this mod. But if you happen to have a junky crank flashlight sitting around, it is something neat to build and throw in your bag when you go camping. Or you could just buy one of the many products that exist and is exactly the same thing. Obviously there is a market for it or they wouldn't exist.
Saying that the guy has too much time because he did something that many people have never thought of and took very little actual time is what I have a problem with. The largest value his "hack" has is that it is like a puzzle in that once you see the solution, you will always be looking at other puzzles and wondering if this one fits. In other words, it was more educational then functional and I consider that to be pretty worthwhile.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I said he had too much time on his hands I wasn't referring to the execution but more so towards the application. Even when camping nowadays people bring generators or use their vehicles electrical system to power small electrical devices. It is neat idea but unless someone can just buy something like this I doubt very many (normal) users will go through the trouble of doing this when they can just buy a car charger.
Figured I would make a thread for it since I don't see one. Interested to see what you all think.
I can see the legitimacy of the claim considering the strength of the signals right next to your head. However for this to actually be proven will take time, a lot of it. If you use a cell phone constantly then investing in a bluetooth headset couldn't hurt,, but periodic use could be no worse than a day at the lake or beach.
Disclaimer : I am not a medical professional but a software developer, so these opinions are pure drivel and have no scientific basis other than knowing the scientific method and keeping my mind open to the possibility.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA Premium App
Cause, doubtful.
Contribute, of course!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
There's been zero scientific studies that show any connection between cellphone use and any sort of cancer. Electro-sensitivity has also been entirely discredited, as people "suffering" from it were shown to have absolutely zero heightened ability to detect any sort of electrical field (which is probably a good thing, since the earth has a freaking massive one all around it).
It seems highly dangerous for the WHO to make any sort of statements like this without evidence to back it up. This is really just a political, not scientific, move.
>implying anybody puts their phones by their heads any more
Sent from my CM7 SCH-i500
(cough) bull****! (cough)
havent we figured out now that everything will give you cancer
**** some asshats will tell you inorganic fruit and veggies will kill you! Haha I just laugh and wait for the air I breathe to give me cancer
Im sure somebody has a study that says it will
(cough) @!#% (cough)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Living gives you cancer, dying doesn't. Being dead is the only way to be sure you won't get cancer, unless of course you had it when you died, then, I don't really know what hope you have
It doesn't take a genius to realize electromagnetic waves (radio) converge at our cell phone antennas and some of that energy is absorbed into our cells, closer to the antenna equals more absorption...since energy turns to heat obviously our cells are heated up and could damage dna over time...look at your microwave or an xray machine, yes given they are higher energy and lower wavelength they do much more damage but who knows what happens over 60 years of cell phone use if always holding it to the same ear
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Have a buddy who told me that he is cutting down on talk time on the phone cause of this - while he was lighting a cigarette.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
dmasjz45 said:
It doesn't take a genius to realize electromagnetic waves (radio) converge at our cell phone antennas and some of that energy is absorbed into our cells, closer to the antenna equals more absorption...since energy turns to heat obviously our cells are heated up and could damage dna over time...look at your microwave or an xray machine, yes given they are higher energy and lower wavelength they do much more damage but who knows what happens over 60 years of cell phone use if always holding it to the same ear
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These same geniuses can also figure out that more electromagnetic radiation (light) is absorbed in 10 minutes outside than likely in years of using a cell phone. Does tv cause cancer? tons of electromagnetic waves there too. I guess im screwed either way! Haha maybe I should take up smoking speed it up a lil!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
droidzach said:
These same geniuses can also figure out that more electromagnetic radiation (light) is absorbed in 10 minutes outside than likely in years of using a cell phone. Does tv cause cancer? tons of electromagnetic waves there too. I guess im screwed either way! Haha maybe I should take up smoking speed it up a lil!
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a moron this guy is, did he really just try to compare the sun to cell phones? You do realize how easy it is to get skin cancer, right? And actually yes genius, crt screens are known to emit low levels of xrays, unless you're living in the 90's and pinning your ear to your tv you probably don't need to worry...as I said before radio waves converge at an antenna, why do you think there are rf warning signs posted near antenna towers? you clearly aren't very technical, probably isn't the best idea to argue with an engineer
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
One, the findings are preliminary, not conclusive. The media needs to learn the difference. Two, everyone who follows even a little science knows cell phones have always contributed to cancer, as well as televisions, monitors, and just about anything electric. How much of a contribution cell phones make is the reason for the study, not IF, as media may confuse. Everyone knows all forms of radiation have a chance of altering the DNA of cells, therefore running the risk of making a cancerous cell, possibly causing full-blown cancer. Note the ifs in that statement. Even smoking cigarettes does not mean you WILL get cancer, it means more cells are modified, increasing the risk. Note the difference.
Anyhow, the study is preliminary, and therefore doesn't mean anything, yet. Prudence advices using your land-line, or bluetooth headset, seeing as it is much lower power, or speakerphone if you must use a cell phone. No matter the finding, cell phones at the ear will never be found good for you, so why wait for a finding to act?
My 14 cents.
Domush said:
No matter the finding, cell phones at the ear will never be found good for you, so why wait for a finding to act?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because if a year of using the cell phone contributes less to your cancer risk than going out just to check your mail in the morning, then it's a colossal waste of time, and effort. There have already been studies attempting to ascertain cell phone usage's contribution to cancer rates, and they've already failed to be able to show any increased risk.
Hell, people still sunbathe even though it's quite common knowledge that that massively increases your odds of getting skin cancer.
dmasjz45 said:
What a moron this guy is, did he really just try to compare the sun to cell phones? You do realize how easy it is to get skin cancer, right? And actually yes genius, crt screens are known to emit low levels of xrays, unless you're living in the 90's and pinning your ear to your tv you probably don't need to worry...as I said before radio waves converge at an antenna, why do you think there are rf warning signs posted near antenna towers? you clearly aren't very technical, probably isn't the best idea to argue with an engineer
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha I guess that engineers like this guy are too "technical" to understand simple sarcasm. The topic of this thread is a joke to me and thats all I was saying **** head. Im not afraid of getting cancer from my phone or tv or car radio or microwave or dental x rays or any other form of everyday very very low doses of radiation we encounter. Dont forget about all of the cosmic rays that are flying through your head right now! And you proved my point about the sun being way more dangerous by saying "do you know how easy it is to get skin cancer." (by the way heat is radiation too and is not what alters your cell's dna which is what cancer is) I wasnt arguing anything either where do you see arguments in my post? All radiation is electromagnetic waves right mr "engineer?" Radio waves converge at your car's antenna too, at every antenna. But I guess that im not "technical" enough to know that. Now I have to say this because you are just an asshole, but its very obvious that there are varying levels of radiation for everything some being more harmful than others. Every study that comes out seems to say you can get cancer from this and that. I just happen to think they are bull****. Maybe you "engineers" just need things explicitly stated so you can comprehend. (moron)
Sent from my SCH-I500 using electromagnetic waves(radiation) look out! hope you have a lead vest and helmet....
KitsuneKnight said:
Because if a year of using the cell phone contributes less to your cancer risk than going out just to check your mail in the morning, then it's a colossal waste of time, and effort. There have already been studies attempting to ascertain cell phone usage's contribution to cancer rates, and they've already failed to be able to show any increased risk.
Hell, people still sunbathe even though it's quite common knowledge that that massively increases your odds of getting skin cancer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They did the studies with GSM phones where the emitted energy signature is a huge spike relative to CDMA phones where the energy signature is so distributed and ever so nebulous, its damn difficult to even get a DX lock on.
"it's a colossal waste of time, and effort." +1
Remember when people thought cigarettes were good for you? And studies on the effects of prolonged use was incomplete? The studies are too young to give conclusive evidence here as well. People will give you all kinds of insight but ultimately its your life and you can chose to do what you want. You can proceed with caution or you can ignore it and assumed it has no effect. That is pretty much what it will boil down to until long term studies are done.
chefthomas99 said:
Have a buddy who told me that he is cutting down on talk time on the phone cause of this - while he was lighting a cigarette.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
^this. pretty much awesome.
10char
The study said that the radiation is non-ionizing like that of a micro-wave. The media grabbed at this and said "the cell phone is going to cook your brain." The levels are not enough to "cook" anything. The point of saying that it is non-ionizing is to say that the likelyhood of causing cancer is very low since the types of radiations that cause cancer (like x-rays) are all ionizing. There is no clear evidence that there is a health risk. The media will still try to scare everyone into watching the news by saying "There is no clear evidence that cell phones are completely safe." Twist it which ever way makes your nipplettes perky.
jamiekuhn said:
There is no clear evidence that there is a health risk.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Media said:
There is no clear evidence that cell phones are completely safe.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, how is your statement any better than the media? You give unverified reassurance and the media gives unverified fear.
How many years passed before people even realized the effects of lead based paint? How about asbestos insulation? Hell, the first ever x-ray machines were used in shoe stores to judge your foot size! You think people thought they would get cancer from those back then?! I'm sure there were people lining up on both sides of the fence back then, too. All refusing to admit those three most difficult words of the self-assured "I.. don't.. know."
Stop doling out false conclusions when nobody knows the answer, hence preliminary findings. The answer is "We don't yet know enough to have an answer one way or the other." False calming has likely killed many more people than panic.
"Oh, these nuclear weapons tests.. no harm at all. Here, go clean up that green ooze with this here broom and dustpan."
or more recently..
"Formaldehyde is everywhere, we can't just go banning it because it's toxic"
As with anything potentially dangerous.. expose yourself as little as needed and no more.
Domush said:
....
As with anything potentially dangerous.. expose yourself as little as needed and no more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are the evidences of the dangerous potential?
You have seen the title so what do you think?
Personally i think that the deaths from crossing the road will blow up
google say that the "screen wont distract you but eff that it will also this is one expensive death root
I thinks it is more dangerous to look at your smartphone while crossing streets or driving your car and so on. If the userinterface is realy like the one shown in Googles newest video (see below) I don't think it is distracting.
belzebub40k said:
I thinks it is more dangerous to look at your smartphone while crossing streets or driving your car and so on. If the userinterface is realy like the one shown in Googles newest video (see below) I don't think it is distracting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lovely. I think they'll do it. Amazing job, it'll be.
paintball23456 said:
You have seen the title so what do you think?
Personally i think that the deaths from crossing the road will blow up
google say that the "screen wont distract you but eff that it will also this is one expensive death root
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The same was said for car stereos and GPS units. They are all a distraction.
HUD(Heads Up Display) has been used successfully for years.
I can't wait to get a pair(?) hmm I guess I can't wait till I get one.
yeah, no thanks.
lol i feel like my eyes would do this after wearing these. and then i imagine the movie THEY LIVE . "put on the glasses!"
I honestly think it will be a bit distracting..
but not to the point where it is as distracting as looking at your phone and doing other things.
but it does kinda add another level of multitasking to your everyday lives. lol
anything can distract you: a noise, a bird, even a pretty woman. it depends on you and you lack of attention. i dont believe it can be that dangerous. maybe i change my mind when i get one
Sent from my Nexus 7
The UI is just like Google Now. No movies, (at least stock UI) just information when and if you need it. Plus it's off to the side so it won't be directly in front of your eye blocking it.
Sent from my Nexus 4
Odp: Google Glass The New pocket death tool.....
Google glass is cool but how it will react to other people ...
Wysyłane z mojego GT-S6500D za pomocą Tapatalk 2
I think it will be neat to try but not sure what the heck I would actually use it for
Sent from my PC36100 using Tapatalk 2
It seems to me that everyone gets worked up when new technology comes out. People say its going to hurt our economy, kill people, make people fat. that has not stopped most people from getting products from this. yea I'm sure 4 or 5 people are going to get hit by a car with this product on, and I'm sure google is going to come out with a safety feature that stops notifications when crossing a road or something. The thing is i know you want one you just want to rag on it a little to see what people have to say about it before you go off and spend a but load of money on it and this information will give you ideas on the essay you need to actually buy one.
It won't be distracting. We always adapt to different technologies...if this was seriously a problem, I don't think AH-64 Apache pilots would have the best track record now would they.
Sent from my HTC PH39100.
I love this tech, I hope they find a way to add the phone. I think the best way would be to connect wireless to the actual phone unless there is a way to be safe with the antenna actualy on the glasses.
---------- Post added at 07:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:55 PM ----------
I love this tech, I hope they find a way to add the phone. I think the best way would be to connect wireless to the actual phone unless there is a way to be safe with the antenna actualy on the glasses
will it really work
Will it really actually practically work?? i have a serious doubt...
I think they are pretty cool. However I doubt I will buy these. Would be a cool toy to use and such. However I do not want to pay a hundreds of dollars for some toy.
morinr said:
I think they are pretty cool. However I doubt I will buy these. Would be a cool toy to use and such. However I do not want to pay a hundreds of dollars for some toy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes. i tought so man.
its cool. but if only can take pic, take video, search , etc. ( like what they reveal now )
i think $1500 abit pricy for this thing
I love the idea of these, but i don't think i'd wear them all the time. They'd be great when flying, especially if you could connect them to an ADSB system and other instruments on the aircraft. A cheap HUD for pilots, showing the horizon (from the proper gyro system), and showing colour coded icons where other aircraft are, etc. The same could be done when driving, i guess, and hiking etc.
I suppose walking through the city with these would be better than walking head-down nose buried in a smartphone, as everyone does now. But i don't know if i would use them in the city. Maybe if they looked like Spider Jerusalem's glasses i might...
Google Glass will revolutionize the world
This has been long overdue. I think they will be safer than cell phones. The voice recognition will take refining; but for the most part, this is an awesome step forward in technology.
You worry warts will see how nice it is when you actually get to use it.
The more I see people with their cell phones while walking, driving, and eating, the more I see the sense in glass and how I really feel like the idea in general will boom. Just like Google started the 7 inch standard, they are starting the glass tech trend
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2