As you move from ROM to ROM has anyone noticed any difference in the picture quality from the camera?
Cheers
I not noticed, but can be...who knows...
Regards
vel726 said:
As you move from ROM to ROM has anyone noticed any difference in the picture quality from the camera?
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Some ROM's use a different camera version; You can compare them under the Advanced option/ About. I'm not sure how much of an improvement one version is over another though. Hope this helps
Going from the original stock rom to the last 6.1 !Aman! rom (2F) which had a much newer HTC camera app, I noticed the problem of overexposure had been fixed. I used to have "brightness" set at -1 or -1.5, now I don't have to. It was an obvious fault and they corrected it.
But other than that, quality is the same.
Related
Even though the XDAIIi cam is 1.3mp the images it produces are awfull!
The upgrade from 0.3mp to 1.3mp is a big selling point for this device, and some people are making the upgrade based on this alone!
Ive taken a couple of pics for you guys to compare.
Any confirmations or comments are welcome!
25 views and not a single comment?
Why aren't you guys more talkative?
RE
OK bro!
From the 3 photos posted the one by XDA II is definitely the best.
Have you make sure the XDA IIi got its best setting for the resolution concerned like its ambience, contrast, saturation, gamma and sharpness?
I would like to upgarde to IIi if its available in my country but now I have second thought after seeing its camera capability. I hope when it's release it would have the camera issue resolved.
Well, it looks worse but it may just be your brightness, contrast, etc..
Hey, BTW, when did XDAII start taking photos at 480x960? Mine can only do 480X640 no matter how I tweak the settings... Did I miss something?
dewild1 said:
Well, it looks worse but it may just be your brightness, contrast, etc..
Hey, BTW, when did XDAII start taking photos at 480x960? Mine can only do 480X640 no matter how I tweak the settings... Did I miss something?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well spotted!
No, that was my mistake it was only 480x640.
Thanks for the feedback guys.
I have tinkered with the settings somewhat, I tried to match them before taking the shots and have tinkered with the XDAIIi settings alone to try and improve it aswell, however no luck.
There is a 'night' settings on the IIi although it makes the pics even worse, and has white flecks all over the image!
It's such a shame, WM2003 SE is great! Integrated WiFi is awesome!
This cam really lets it down though.
I've finally made my decision:
Mines going back. It just doesn't cut it.
So then, how long before the next WM device from O2?
And what can we expect?
upgrade the ROM and see~
Have U ungrade ur ROm to i-mate's latest ROm? I realize that the camera's "nightmode" indeed remove those white flecks. But I admit my xdaII's camera (WM2003SE download from xda-developer) is nicer than the original PDA2's camera
On my PDA2,I reckon the resolution is much higher; it's hard to tell on computer screen but once U magifiy it (ZOOM in) then U will find L is L (640x480) and why we need XL 1024x640
The next concern: anyone know any patch or .cab to improve the camera spec in order to get better quality of pic? cheers~
...
The quality very depends on the settings and adjustments. I took 5 pics(3 indoor,2 outdoor)with my Himalaya(VGA Cam). There are too many differences which causes the adjustments. Take a look...
Hi,
I had an german o2 XDA NEO, and for one day played with the original settings.
At the time I thought the camera worked very well, and didnt think much of it.
After upgrading to dopod ROM via crossvendor thread, I get the feeling the camera is worse. When I'm in 'shooting' mode, looking through the 'viewfinder' everthing is VERY VERY blurry.
I'm sure it wasn't so bad with the o2 image.
Anyone else had the same expierence?
Thanks.
Forgot to switch back from macro-mode?
The neo has the macro-mode ring on the lens as all other Prophet models? You didn't leave it on macro by any chance . . . ?
I wish it were that easy. The refresh rate of the screen just seems so slowwww, so everything takes a while to become clear. It's just wierd.... :?
Serious lag on camera after Dopod ROM
egg said:
I wish it were that easy. The refresh rate of the screen just seems so slowwww, so everything takes a while to become clear. It's just wierd.... :?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I too have experienced this very blurry and laggy response from the camera since having switched to the same Dopod ROM from Oranges M600 ROM. Additionally, the images seem to be more specled with blue dots. Not the case before! I hope someone will release a camera patch/update to solve this problem, as I was very happy with the photo quality before.
However, having said that, I wouldn't switch back to my old Orange ROM, as this novendor id ROM from Dopod is great in every other way!
Re: Serious lag on camera after Dopod ROM
mackaby007 said:
egg said:
I wish it were that easy. The refresh rate of the screen just seems so slowwww, so everything takes a while to become clear. It's just wierd.... :?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I too have experienced this very blurry and laggy response from the camera since having switched to the same Dopod ROM from Oranges M600 ROM. Additionally, the images seem to be more specled with blue dots. Not the case before! I hope someone will release a camera patch/update to solve this problem, as I was very happy with the photo quality before.
However, having said that, I wouldn't switch back to my old Orange ROM, as this novendor id ROM from Dopod is great in every other way!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you experimented with the camera settings? Maybe the new ROM has different default values.
Re: Still pooooor quality photos
Matterhorn said:
mackaby007 said:
egg said:
I wish it were that easy. The refresh rate of the screen just seems so slowwww, so everything takes a while to become clear. It's just wierd.... :?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I too have experienced this very blurry and laggy response from the camera since having switched to the same Dopod ROM from Oranges M600 ROM. Additionally, the images seem to be more specled with blue dots. Not the case before! I hope someone will release a camera patch/update to solve this problem, as I was very happy with the photo quality before.
However, having said that, I wouldn't switch back to my old Orange ROM, as this novendor id ROM from Dopod is great in every other way!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you experimented with the camera settings? Maybe the new ROM has different default values.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, just adjusted the settings in various ways and different ambient settings and took pictures of the same room with the same light exposure etc. Definately degraded photo quality. Looks more like 1.3 megpixels as opposed to 2MP! I'm seriously dissapointed as I use the camera quite often, but would not trade the features of a PPC phone for a dedicated cam/phone like Sony Ericsson.
On the Orange ROM, I must admit, the pictures were not at all far behind that of my old SE K750i, an IMHO even more impressive in macro mode.
Anyway it looks like the old HTC camera software offering of the older devices and they usually got a camera patch to improve things, so I'll keep my fingers crossed. :wink:
HTC Prophet (was an Orange M600)
Sim unlocked (using Lokiwiz03 - now using o2 Sim)
ROM version: 2.15.13.27 WWE
ROM date: 3/9/06
Radio version: 02.19.21
Protocol version: 4.1.13.09
ExtROM version: 2.15.13.121
Camera settings need changing on Dopod ROM
Ok have been testing some more and for those of you who need your photos to look half decent or even good on with the new Dopod ROM only, try these settings within viewfinder mode :Tools/adjust
Contrast = 4
Brightness = 4
Saturation = 4
Hue = 5
Sharpness = 6
These settings have made quite an improvement on the photo quality resulting in noversaturated pictures and extreming 'whiting' caused by too much brightness and contrast. Lastly the sharpness invrease value of 1 to 6 from the default 5 has also improved picture quality for me.
Hope this helps someone else too.
I have been trying my new Trinity and I think it is the best phone I have had. But after comparing some photos with my old K700 I have realized that the quality of them are very low, bad colors, pixeled, etc...
Is it because of the hardware or maybe the software included? Anyone has noticed that?
I have the same problem. I tried to make some adjustments ... nothing helpped
SrAgaporni said:
I have been trying my new Trinity and I think it is the best phone I have had. But after comparing some photos with my old K700 I have realized that the quality of them are very low, bad colors, pixeled, etc...
Is it because of the hardware or maybe the software included? Anyone has noticed that?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A rom upgrade, even with an official wm5 rom including a newer camera application can help a lot. Roms with gps normally have a camera upgrade, a newer wm6 rom with the latest camera could be better.
With mine, a wm6 coocked rom, photos are good during dayligts and too yellow in the night. But no pixeled at all, at least at 2M resolution...
Ciao
I have upgraded my phone with WM6 (Indigo version) and it seems the quality of the photos also have been upgraded. Now my photos in night mode are great, always that I don't move the camera, but I think they should be even better. Any software to manage the camera?
i have indigo too and i like the photo quality.i think it´s better than the official rom.
Is it just me or does the camera on HTC Sense seem better than the stock Android one?
And also which one produces better quality images?
Are u running a sense rom or just comparing a sense phone to a stock?
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using XDA App
I'm comparing Virtuous to CM 6.1.1 both stock cameras on each rom.
Image quality they should be about equal. I think I prefer the Sense camera though for the sounds alone. I HATE the focus and shutter sound on the stock cam. Wish I could find an APK for the DZ 1.72 cam that works on CM6.1.1
Hot_Hands said:
Image quality they should be about equal. I think I prefer the Sense camera though for the sounds alone. I HATE the focus and shutter sound on the stock cam. Wish I could find an APK for the DZ 1.72 cam that works on CM6.1.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
/10chars
The gallery in sense probably just displays them in full resolution.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 running Cyanogenmod.
ibemad1 said:
The gallery in sense probably just displays them in full resolution.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 running Cyanogenmod.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah, good to point out. Sometimes the picture previews in some programs aren't full resolution to cut down on processing times, delays, etc.
Is anyone able to confirm this? I also think they may look a little bit better in Sense but I must admit that when I viewed them using another image viewer afterwards they looked about the same. Didn't pay enough attention to make a qualified report though.
Best way to test would be to just put both the sense pic and the stock pic on your computer.
Sent from my T-Mobile G2 running Cyanogenmod.
can someone give me fix for camera ? quality its really bad , its not like in stock rom
achozenone said:
can someone give me fix for camera ? quality its really bad , its not like in stock rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah we all are aware about the camera quality of our beloved N4. There is no such fix for camera(in terms of hardware and software).
BUT
you can try apps like camera zoom fx(paid) it is too cool for clicking pics with good quality. Try it yourself and see it satisfies your needs.
Press thanks if I helped you. :good: