http://www.reghardware.co.uk/2009/01/19/review_smartphone_htc_touch_3g/
Related
Using the grainy screenshot published earlier, and assuming 4.8 inch screen, this is a rough scale comparison with the Athena. Now I wonder if I should go for Touch Pro2 or hang on for this. Any opinions?
Just hang in there , until both is out , only then u compare which one is best for u and your usages - jimmunsw
Hi
I've just shown a good video comparing the legend to the iphone (unfortunately not 3Gs).
It's very interresting. I don't know if someone here did the switch from apple to htc and can add his point of view. I actually hesitate between iphone 3gs and the legend..
This is the video:
youtube.com/user/mt69298#p/a/u/2/jU3ZqRUl38A
another useless comparison between iphone & jdaojdad ....
Since there are a lot of talk about atnts release, I thought I might bring this up.
http://blog.naver.com/themickyd?Red...mpingVid=30C218837DFC3995B2DD231E17F531B10E29
Featuring a comparison of the Korean LTE model (Black) and and International Model (White).
There are two videos:
1. Boot time comparison
2. Video comparison
I'll do a rough translation of the text. My Korean isn't that great so don't expect perfection..
========================================================
[Galaxy Note] Galaxy note 3g(international) vs Galaxy note LTE(Korea) comparison (thickness and normal functions)
[insert pictures of the two notes]
Hi this is Mickey. Today we're going to compare the Galaxy note 3g and the Galaxy note LTE. On the left is the white international model, and the right is the Korean LTE model.
[insert picture of the two notes with specs]
3G model: Exynos 4210, FM radio, ???, 3G, warranty not available in korea
LTE model: Snapdragon APQ, DMB, ???, 4G LTE and 3G compatible, warranty available in Korea
Let's take a look at the difference in specs first. The 3g model sports an exynos 1.4GHz, the LTE model has a snapdragon 1.5GHz. There isn't really much of a difference in speed in normal use. Very rarely there is a difference in S Memo.
Galaxy note 3g mode --- blah blah --- * this talks about the phone plans. 3g mode doesn't need a contract -- blah blah
[insert another picture]
3g model has Fm radio while LTE model has DMB. The 3g model has a video maker application. I don't really see a big use for this.
[insert boot comparison video]
Galaxy note 3g and LTE boot speed comparison. Booting is roughly the same, wish a very small difference. The 3g version has a lot of apps installed due to development work, while the LTE is out of the box. You can say that the 3g model boots up just a little faster.
[insert croc picture]
Checking responsiveness of stylus between the models. I failed to prepare the video for this. The 3g model felt faster right out of the box, but after all of the apps on the 3g model (development stuff), the LTE model out of the box seems faster. As you can also see in the picture, the color contrast seems different.
[insert thickness picture]
Comparing thickness, the LTE model looks a little bigger due to DMB.
[Insert video comparison]
Playing a 1080p SNSD music video. Playing works well on both, and so does the playing progress bar.
[insert back picture, stylus picture]
Just talks about pen color --blah blah--
So we saw the difference between both phones. There's definitely pros and cons for one or the other. You can't say one's better than the other. Hope this helps choosing the right phone for you.
This is consistent with this English review of the Korean LTE Note:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zd9Pa8jZYW0&context=C37f0d84ADOEgsToPDskJCqhTX3QBpAn2vXlpGm_Ll
There have been lots of reports of dissatisfaction with the Korean Note, but the few reviews I've seen by actual users have been positive. I'm reassured that battery life and responsiveness are not an issue some people claimed they would be.
http://pocketnow.com/2012/06/25/showdown-quad-core-vs-dual-core-samsung-galaxy-s-iii-video/
No battery test. Meh
I just found a video review to share with you of the Galaxy Note II done by PhoneArena.com
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jp_REhzPPEo
it is good review but they did not provide enough info regarding the battery.
What do you guys think?
I think that it is not a review, it is a ****ty article with not all the features that we already know weeks ago in the search of traffic for making money being "the first"
Where are the test of
- Audio quality
- Slow motion camera
- Record screen
- S-pen advance features like "losing the pen"
- Battery tests
- ram available to the user
- storage, 2gb partition for data and 10 to user? Or 12 to all?
Seriously, that its not a review. Waiting for anandtech or gsmarena
Sir, there is a Review thread established, Thank You and closed.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1903295