Related
Hi,
Most of these are supposedly taken from the camera in Xperia... They look great for a 3.2 mega-pixel camera...
http://xperiancers.com/images/
Best regards.
I think only one picture was really taken with the Xperia X1.
You can flip the images and only one image has a comment which states that the picture was taken using the X1 camera.
Hmm... i think you may be right. Their main post led me to believe that most of them were, but i probably interpretted it wrong.
but the picture lineout looks cool with the movements and such
Yes quite cool and it's free to use: tiltViewer
By the way: Here you can find the photo taken with the Xperia X1 in higher resolution: click
Looks very good!
http://www.theunwired.net/?item=pre...nia-sony-ericsson-x1-camera-comparison-update
Rudegar said:
http://www.theunwired.net/?item=pre...nia-sony-ericsson-x1-camera-comparison-update
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"With the Beta ROM, the house was more yellow then red but now, with the final ROM, the camera quality definitely improved and colors are right now." They say this for the i900... so hopefully we'll see further improvement in Xperia's final ROM.
The Omnia has a pretty decent photo quality for a mobile phone, but to be honest, the X1, Diamond and Touch Pro is really pathetic.
Let's see if the final ROM gives some improvement on this, but my hopes are not very high. (Fortunately, I don't need the camera anyways)
xmoo said:
Looks very good!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really?
But he also stated following:
An image shot using the camera on the Xperia X1 at the media preview event on Monday the 15th Sept 08. Bear in mind that this is in very low light, hence the motion blur.
So low light conditions are always difficult and of course especially for an inbuilt mobile phone camera.
foo said:
I think only one picture was really taken with the Xperia X1.
You can flip the images and only one image has a comment which states that the picture was taken using the X1 camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why you said that? There is not reason to believe these pictures weren't taken with the X1. Maybe you secretly wished to be bad.
The ones at the bottom OBVIOUSLY, were not. those the original art from Feb 10th 2008. All the others they HAVE text on the reverse but who cares it's just estupid effect of the creators of this viewer that is nice but just annoying. If I want to see a picture or download it I don't need all that tilting.
Well maybe you're right though I don't believe it.
You can also have a look at the flicker stream here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/
The naming and the quality of the pictures is very different.
But okay, unfortunately they removed all EXIF otherwise it would have been easy to find out, but so I can only guess by indication.
Much better photos form X1
Lot of good photos taken using X1:-
http://www.wallpaper.com/interiors/london-design-festival-2008/2625
( in the bottom 3 GALLEYS)
The photo quality is better then I would have expected, though it can't compete with a compact camera, it shows a really decent quality for a smartphone.
Very nice
foo said:
The photo quality is better then I would have expected, though it can't compete with a compact camera, it shows a really decent quality for a smartphone.
Very nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And a compact camera can not compite the other features of the Xperia.
C'mon... we all know that.
In a positive way, I would compare these great pictures to the Touch Pro. Oranges and Oranges.
I kinda want to see a side by side of the X1 and the K790a/K800i. Judging by the pictures on all the sites the camera on the X1 appears to be far worse than those 2 year old handsets.
Yup, they are worse, worse than most current cameraphones (N95, N82, Innov8, Omnia, many other Sony models). You have to live with that with this phone, but at least they're serviceable enough in decent light conditions.
My camera on my wizard is covered by a skin right now so that goes to show you how much I care about a camera lol.
foo said:
The Omnia has a pretty decent photo quality for a mobile phone, but to be honest, the X1, Diamond and Touch Pro is really pathetic.
Let's see if the final ROM gives some improvement on this, but my hopes are not very high. (Fortunately, I don't need the camera anyways)
Really?
But he also stated following:
An image shot using the camera on the Xperia X1 at the media preview event on Monday the 15th Sept 08. Bear in mind that this is in very low light, hence the motion blur.
So low light conditions are always difficult and of course especially for an inbuilt mobile phone camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was comparing that with the Kaiser
foo said:
I think only one picture was really taken with the Xperia X1.
You can flip the images and only one image has a comment which states that the picture was taken using the X1 camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
does x1 have got cam
cihanleanne said:
does x1 have got cam
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That thread is from 2008.
And yes, the x1 has cam (1 front. 1 back)
Hi,
in a German mobile phone journal I read a review on the Touch HD in which they claim that the camera is somewhat weak:
1. They say that it takes about 3 seconds between pressing to shoot the photo and actually shooting the photo.
2. They say that photos are blurred and out of focus.
Can someone of you that have the Touch HD confirm this? How is the quality of the camera?
I can confirm the 2-3 sec shutter lag on my hd. I wouldn't call the photos blurry, but of the same low mobile phone quality as many earlier generations. the 5mp are completely useless in my opinion, 2mp would be good enough. but the lag is really bad, pretty much rules out any snapshots or pics of moving objects...
I guess this is because of the autofocus working so slow.
It would be better if you could "point and shoot", e.g. as with normal cameras press the shutter half way to focus, and then press through. But I could not find out how to do it.
it says in the camera settings "main camera rear 3.2 mpcmos camera". (?)
i think the camera is fine as when you press shoot it takes a little bit of time to actually take the picture which gives you time to steady the phone in your hands(particularly as i have shaky hands) unlike regular cameras/camera phones when you lose some of the steadyness when pressing a physical shoot button.
quality wise they look fine no complaints here god willing.
..i have to admit that - among the marvelous things which i saw in the last 48 hours - the camera is the one that impressed me less. I really refer to the quality of images in low light conditions, the HTC cmos sensors have never been particularly brilliant and the touch HD is no exception in this respect (but it is in all the other aspects, in my opinion).
pzucchel said:
..i have to admit that - among the marvelous things which i saw in the last 48 hours - the camera is the one that impressed me less. I really refer to the quality of images in low light conditions, the HTC cmos sensors have never been particularly brilliant and the touch HD is no exception in this respect (but it is in all the other aspects, in my opinion).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot to all the answers. Hmm, I wonder if this is possibly be cured by a software hack or later firmware, but I guess this is hardware related. Too bad. Still unsure between X1 and HD, and I know I would miss a hardware keyboard. Plus, the HD seems to be delayed in Germany ... And now this camera issues. I have to wait and see both live and compare them ...
Eriol
camera is not so bad. Considering that we are talking about a winmo device (the ONLY one with decent camera is samsung I900) I think HD takes brilliant photos when shooting with good light. It'S WAY better than any other HTC and slightly better than Sony Ericsson G900 (another 5mpx smartphone)
and is way back from X1 or Omnia.
ciao Eriol,
(I have a touch HD)
i think you are right: in the doubt, maybe better wait and see. I read about this issue of shooting delays, but actually I am not much sensitive since even with other telephones the time between thinking "i want to make a picture" and the actual picture is...10 seconds? it is very different from a real reflex camera, where in a fraction of a second you are there and the picture is in memory. I don't use the phone camera much, admittedly.
But once you will see a real one: the screen is really beautiful. I could read A4 pdf documents in full screen....by itself, to me is a quantum jump which is big enough to justify the choice.
You can see the picture quality in the attachment.
I's a Blackstone photo? Very good colors, I like'it.
kdomo said:
You can see the picture quality in the attachment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I made the photo, with my Touch HD.
And no PS?
kdomo said:
Yes, I made the photo, with my Touch HD.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kdomo said:
You can see the picture quality in the attachment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is one excellent picture...picture quality is really good
kdomo said:
You can see the picture quality in the attachment.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That on 5MPX?
Information on it says
2592 x 1552 Pixels (4.02 MPixels)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_Fly_ said:
And no PS?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats the PS? Photoshop? No.
PS = Photoshop.
So this picture comes directly from the mobile and without manipulation? Very good, indeed.
kdomo said:
Whats the PS? Photoshop? No.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, 5 MPX. I am can not, why 4.02.
More picture directly from the mobile and without manipulation here:
http://kdomo.extra.hu/hd.zip
Well, these photos can already say that lack a bit of definition. Need sharpness.
_Fly_ said:
Well, these photos can already say that lack a bit of definition. Need sharpness.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No wonder, this comes from a ridiculous small sensor and cheap optics. But hey, this is not that bad!
Hi everyone, do you have a cab with the latest and greatest camera sw with autofocus which works with Jade? My wife complains about poor quality of the pictures and I was appointed to search for a solution.Thx in advance.
does she use the maximum capacity of camera? I mean 3M.
ady_uaic said:
does she use the maximum capacity of camera? I mean 3M.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, of course.
the ideea is first to have the autofocus implemented, since the current camera sw which is coming with the phone seems not to have this feature. Thx for help.
a. am inteles. incerc sa fac un rom si eu momentan, si caut idei, sugestii, etc .
AFAIK, autofocus is a mechanical feature of cameras...
So I don't think any software will be able to provide autofocus, unless Jade has it but HTC did not implement it, which I doubt...
avutza said:
Hi everyone, do you have a cab with the latest and greatest camera sw with autofocus which works with Jade? My wife complains about poor quality of the pictures and I was appointed to search for a solution.Thx in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Buy a phone that does what you want it to do, don't imagine you can magically make one you buy do everything you want it to.
izzyzc said:
AFAIK, autofocus is a mechanical feature of cameras...
So I don't think any software will be able to provide autofocus, unless Jade has it but HTC did not implement it, which I doubt...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, focusing is about the movement of the lens, so it is merely mechanical.
Anyway, the Jade camera can still take pic in acceptable quality if:
1) there is sufficient light source (eg outdoor under briight sun-shine)
2) keep sufficient distant from the objects (eg 1 meter or above)
3) keep your hand still as you can when taking photos
when people speak they should know about what they are speaking or stay quiet!!!
unlike what everyone said here it´s not just a mechanical question it´s also a software issue because i inserted a htc touch diamond camera on the htc jade and no autofocus function was available with the camera but diamond has autofocus and you know what pictures with jade lens here actually better.. so instead of speaking without knowing you should be quiet!!!
hey if you want to download jarfx then click on the link
on the xperia blog they say they have review handsets so soon we should see some reviews.
if u have a website or blog u may be able to get a review handset (u will have to send it back after review).
link:
http://xperiancers.com/2009/10/15/x2-review-samples-pitch-us-on-twitter/
according to there twitter page the review handsets will be sent out next week. so hopefully there will be a ton of reviews, pics and vids by next wednesday.
Please don't consider this a flame on this thread but they can keep their X2.
It will be obsolete in six months anyway with the way SE supports.
I got one coming (hopefully)
augie7107 said:
Please don't consider this a flame on this thread but they can keep their X2.
It will be obsolete in six months anyway with the way SE supports.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know about you, but the X2 has definitely not made the X1 obsolete for me.
There are so many hardware features that are missing on the X2 but were on the X1 such as the optical joystick, video call and a 3.5mm audio jack. The X1 is still the better phone IMO.
edit: Hmmmm, I just saw a hands-on and it did show both an optical joystick and a 3.5mm audio jack on the X2, I wonder why SE's website lists it as not having those two :/
Still no front camera though
gsgflash said:
I don't know about you, but the X2 has definitely not made the X1 obsolete for me.
There are so many hardware features that are missing on the X2 but were on the X1 such as the optical joystick, video call and a 3.5mm audio jack. The X1 is still the better phone IMO.
edit: Hmmmm, I just saw a hands-on and it did show both an optical joystick and a 3.5mm audio jack on the X2, I wonder why SE's website lists it as not having those two :/
Still no front camera though
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is a front camera and video call on the x2 but SE employ retards that dont put the right information on there site.
if my x1 broke and I was offered a x2 under warrenty I'd take it
otherwise it's pretty meh imho
To be honest...I've gotten so used to the optical joystick, I couldn't forsee myself not having one anymore.
Best thing about the xperia, is the size, I hope the X2 doesn't blow up in size.
mrbkkt1 said:
To be honest...I've gotten so used to the optical joystick, I couldn't forsee myself not having one anymore.
Best thing about the xperia, is the size, I hope the X2 doesn't blow up in size.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but there is optical one on X2!
As for size - just look in the web!
There are sizes on many sites!
Like GSMArena.
They're almost the same!
The X2 has a couple nice things that the X1 was missing. It certainly isn't a worthy upgrade, but I'd trade my X1 for an X2 tomorrow.
augie7107 said:
Please don't consider this a flame on this thread but they can keep their X2.
It will be obsolete in six months anyway with the way SE supports.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It beca:me obsolete the very second they announced it ha the same ancient processor/specs...
Ganondolf said:
but SE employ retards that dont put the right information on there site.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL!!!!!!
Unfortunatelly true...
do a comparison on gsmarena. X2 has stereo speakers, better camera, and imo a better keyboard layout, but it x1 has FM radio /w RDS and those cool LED lights.
taekimon said:
do a comparison on gsmarena. X2 has stereo speakers, better camera, and imo a better keyboard layout, but it x1 has FM radio /w RDS and those cool LED lights.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And X2 has also cool lights.
doministry said:
And X2 has also cool lights.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not as cool though .
Also, I like how you pop up every time someone mentions that the X2 sucks, it's ugly, etc. .
orelsi said:
Not as cool though .
Also, I like how you pop up every time someone mentions that the X2 sucks, it's ugly, etc. .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
meh, I think the LED lights look better on the X2 than the X1. I think the X2 as a whole looks better than the X1, besides the keyboard.
emuneee said:
meh, I think the LED lights look better on the X2 than the X1. I think the X2 as a whole looks better than the X1, besides the keyboard.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i have to agree about the leds, the x2 night rider style led effect is a lot better than the x1's 4 led flashing effect.
Ganondolf said:
i have to agree about the leds, the x2 night rider style led effect is a lot better than the x1's 4 led flashing effect.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I prefer X1's placement despite the fact that talking cars are kinda cool lol.
orelsi said:
Also, I like how you pop up every time someone mentions that the X2 sucks, it's ugly, etc. .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well it's a positive version of your iPhone syndrome
I want X2 and I like it, that's it.
doministry said:
Well it's a positive version of your iPhone syndrome
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ROFL , touché...
there`s even a video review on the unwired: unboxing video X2. I would go for it.
fring has released a software to use videocall on iphone 3g even iphone doesnot support videocall do we have any chance to make video call on our hd2 via software like fring for future release or driver to enable videocall by the main camera like some nokia devices with one camera or hd2 lakes the videocall support hardware
no answers
I have to ask, what is the point of a one way video call?
I used to make a a lot of video calls on my Nokia E90 and hardly ever used the front camera. I was mostly pointing the camera at something I wanted to show someone... my kids/dog/stuff to buy at the store etc... you can film anything you want... even yourself if you want to show your new hair style or whatever. What I never used it for was pointing the camera at myself for 10 minutes while looking at the other person on the phone.
Tubgirl said:
I used to make a a lot of video calls on my Nokia E90 and hardly ever used the front camera. I was mostly pointing the camera at something I wanted to show someone... my kids/dog/stuff to buy at the store etc... you can film anything you want... even yourself if you want to show your new hair style or whatever. What I never used it for was pointing the camera at myself for 10 minutes while looking at the other person on the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you are right we don't need front camera to do videocall if the hardware exists like allot of nokia phones the question is is it possible to enable videocall in hd2 camera with main camera like what happened in the xperia x1 usa edition look at this link http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=475910
HD2 Video call support
I really hope that someone will enable it to HD2 users as well
I really hope that Hoss_n2 finds the full stop on his keyboard...
R3dF1v3 said:
I really hope that Hoss_n2 finds the full stop on his keyboard...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry but iam very bad at punctuation if this is what you mean
if not please tell me what you mean