MDA Compact vs MDA Comapct @ 520MHz - JAM, MDA Compact, S100 General

Spb Benchmark
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I suppose you run 520Mhz and downclock the memory speed.
Try run it on 470Mhz with original memory clk.

I used XCPUScalar 2004 v2.87 to overclock my MDA.

I am not sure what kind of processor MDA compact has,PXA 263?
If yes,you can use the Mamaich's Overclock utility or use Hack Master.

It's PXA272

Use hackmaster and pay attention to memory multiplier.
Good luck!

Results seem to indicate hardly any noticible difference so it isn't worth it surely?

saldous said:
Results seem to indicate hardly any noticible difference so it isn't worth it surely?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's why I've made this test.
The question is: Does this program do anything?

unapproachable2kx said:
Use hackmaster and pay attention to memory multiplier.
Good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm... what settings should I use?

I was using XCPUScaler and felt the same way (like I didnt realy notice any difference). Then I switched to Pocket Hack master and I think it made a difference in performance even just running it at 415. I would love to see the results of this test using PHM.

OK...
I used Pocket Hack Master 2005 v3.10.007 (
) and now... I can see the difference. 8)

The question is: Does this program do anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in fact it does not.. :!:
I have used XCPscaler and it worked, it said 520MHz just like the previous photo but when I tried Beta-Player to benchmark the device.... it said 416 MHz..
and when I used lower speeds.. Beta-player and the XCPUScalar gave the same result...
so I could only down-clock my device, but I couldn't overclock it...

duke911 said:
The question is: Does this program do anything?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in fact it does not.. :!:
I have used XCPscaler and it worked, it said 520MHz just like the previous photo but when I tried Beta-Player to benchmark the device.... it said 416 MHz..
and when I used lower speeds.. Beta-player and the XCPUScalar gave the same result...
so I could only under-clock my device, but I couldn't overclock it...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use Pocket Hack Master 2005 v3.10.007

sweet dude, I knew hackmaster made a diff. WOW
Hey "SomeOne" did a good job. Thanks anton tomov :lol:

I'm not getting tired to mention that your battery drain increases dramatically with PHM, even when underclocking! This is due to the non existing voltage control of the processor when using PHM.
I prefer longer use over some more speed when playing games - but that's to everyone himself. Normal applications don't benefit a bit from the faster CPU!

you can choose which applications should use 520MHz
other ones will have only 416MHz

PHM even supports scaling, meaning that it uses a slower clock than normal when not busy and a higher clock when busy. Still, with pure underclocking or using this scaling, your battery drain will significantly be higher than without using PHM. As i said, this is due the non existing capability of PHM to dynamically regulate the voltage of the CPU. If the clock is not set by a software, the CPU automatically reduces the voltage when not in use. This reduces the battery drain significantly (for me, this meant about one day longer usage of my magician).
That is the reason why I don't recommend using PHM, even though everyone can do what he wants. Maybe other softwares are capable of doing this but i doubt it!

The result should made XCPU scaler ashame for showing a faked clock speed. (actually, it start faking this since version 2.85d)

I've installed PHM and my Magician is now running at 520MHz. Does anyone have any bad experiences overclocking theirs?

kta said:
I've installed PHM and my Magician is now running at 520MHz. Does anyone have any bad experiences overclocking theirs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Jam running too hot under warm weather. Hard reset and date corruption in the SD

Related

Check it out [hTC Touch Cruise OS 5.2.19900 Public version]

Pretty nice ROM, FULL CREAM
have a look:
http://www.pdamobiz.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=132435&PN=1
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]
Memory [/FONT][FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]balance after flash[/FONT]
[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Ram 60 mb
Program (ROM) 120mb
enjoy and thanks to the guys at www.pdamobiz.com really love the ROM
[/FONT]
Nice flying.
Has anyone tried it? Does it really has overclock? How safe is it for the 520mhz, since there is only a 624mhz!!! warning?
Any download site?
Gerigo-Greece said:
Any download site?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://fs04n2.sendspace.com/dl/bdec...76fb8d/482450e06b734fc1/p7yd02/Mobiz_990F.rar
http://files.pdamobiz.com/drpee/Polaris/Mobiz_990F.rar
pereirald said:
Has anyone tried it? Does it really has overclock? How safe is it for the 520mhz, since there is only a 624mhz!!! warning?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sincerely that are the frequescies of a Intel/Marvel CPU (ie 312, 520, 624 MHz)
Qualcomm has 400 and 528 Mhz
this is for intel processors, it does nothing to the quallcomm processors afaik
I can not work more than 400 MHz.
This ROM will spend the weekend with me : Feels smooth and sweet. If it passes, it could stay with me for awhile
What language was on that site?
I think Thai.
Hi, the rom is nice. It has many Thai customizations so you need to chnage your regional settings, the timezone, language etch. to english to get the full English menu. So far so good. No problems.
pereirald said:
Has anyone tried it? Does it really has overclock? How safe is it for the 520mhz, since there is only a 624mhz!!! warning?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd tried it. The performance program in the setting does not really overclock the cpu but it does feel faster. The 520mhz was tested making the cpu run faster than 624 mhz. You all can try it cause it does no harm. So far this rom is running very stable for me.
Try it and you'll love it.
tcvaio said:
YOu can try use your finger to turn the htc home from left to right with the advantages of the Ultimate launcher(you must choose ultimate plugin in the settings/today)
Try it and you'll love it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you guys for the good work,
I can not find the Ultimate launcher anywhere in the settings
Very good ROM but the first one without Greek Regional Settings!!!
Where can i find that?
Not as fast as i expected and without Greek regional settings it's useless for Greece!
There some to be some really good ROMs on the PDAMobiz site, but I can't find any download links anywhere.
I've tried using a Thai to English translator, but it still doesn't make much sense.
Does anyone know where the ROMs are stored, so I can check out some of the others?
Thanks,
Bagpuss.
tcvaio said:
I'd tried it. The performance program in the setting does not really overclock the cpu but it does feel faster. The 520mhz was tested making the cpu run faster than 624 mhz. You all can try it cause it does no harm. So far this rom is running very stable for me.
YOu can try use your finger to turn the htc home from left to right with the advantages of the Ultimate launcher(you must choose ultimate plugin in the settings/today)
Try it and you'll love it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This version has no Ultimate Launch.
You are confused with Ultimate Black version.
vivi
vivi said:
This version has no Ultimate Launch.
You are confused with Ultimate Black version.
vivi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh boy
There's a bug with the sms application after awhile. When you want to compose a new sms, the screen is totally blank. Have tried flashing two times and the same thing happened. Went back to Aserg's ROM.

nueOverClockTest + Msm7kCpuSpeed = 1056 MHz !!!

I havent experimented too much but this is the first result of the two mentioned programs mixed together (stirred , not shaken ) when installed on the X2
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Just launch nueOverClockTest (it will put your CPU @ 768Mhz).
then launch Msm7kCpuSpeed (it will show 960MHz)
then exit from Msm7kCpuSpeed (our CPU will be clocked @1056MHz, you can check reopening one of the two programs).
As you can see on the screenshots the overclock works also if the phone is battery powered.
No benchmark atm, but @1056Mhz the phone is reeeallyyy a pleasure to use.
The overclock seem really working.
Navigon will take about 30 sec to start @ stock speed, but will take only 16/18 sec to start @ 1056
and how much does 1056mhz stress the cpu ?
indycar said:
and how much does 1056mhz stress the cpu ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure that this value is correct, what' I see is an improvement on the performances and this is enough for me.
Btw the only broken cpus I saw in 27 years of IT involvement were some athlon XP powered on w/o the heat-sink, so I don't care less about the cpu stress.
where can i get the programs for this? can u give me a link?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Msm7kCpuSpeed
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=nueOverClockTest
Hi guys,
I have followed the process outlined here and it seems to be working great on the phone. Just wanted to know if you have any other programs that can be used to benchmark the performance improvement in comparison to lets say a stock X2.
Regards,
Ani
Testing. It seems to work.
Piece of crap phone; it doesn't matter if I burn it.
Cheers.
Jolo_ said:
Testing. It seems to work.
Piece of crap phone; it doesn't matter if I burn it.
Cheers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm whit you
Applied it, works 100% and I love it.
Cheers mates for sharing this!
sounds interesting.... anyone noticed a major reduction in battery life as a result of this?
anothadave said:
sounds interesting.... anyone noticed a major reduction in battery life as a result of this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. For me is performing the same as before, even with Push and 3G enabled.
The phone seems even more stable.
Cheers.
The Solutor said:
I havent experimented too much but this is the first result of the two mentioned programs mixed together (stirred , not shaken ) when installed on the X2
Just launch nueOverClockTest (it will put your CPU @ 768Mhz).
then launch Msm7kCpuSpeed (it will show 960MHz)
then exit from Msm7kCpuSpeed (our CPU will be clocked @1056MHz, you can check reopening one of the two programs).
As you can see on the screenshots the overclock works also if the phone is battery powered.
No benchmark atm, but @1056Mhz the phone is reeeallyyy a pleasure to use.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you ever tried this one?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7463284&postcount=162
works very well (one week @729) with the tp2
7ommy said:
have you ever tried this one?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=7463284&postcount=162
works very well (one week @729) with the tp2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, already tried, doesn't starts at all
"could not connect to OCT0:"
how long has ur phone remained overclock @ 1GHz? any SOD/freeze occured?
does ur phone gets unusually warmed due to overclocking it?
appreciate if u can feedback on improvement in running apps eg 3d games, video playback, etc.
cheers
NoXsTeR said:
how long has ur phone remained overclock @ 1GHz? any SOD/freeze occured?
does ur phone gets unusually warmed due to overclocking it?
appreciate if u can feedback on improvement in running apps eg 3d games, video playback, etc.
cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine works at 1056 MHz since Sep. 3rd without draining battery or overheating at all.
Yes apps run faster, video playback smoother even in WMP, no more glitches in music while surfing the net.
Most important is it's overall stable, no SOD or crashes here.
i have x2 freeze fr about 10 - 15 seconds. may be lacks of cabs install agter hard reset. who know. will need to re-install to check soon.
Heh
testing.. work !
WOW !! just tried overclocking a few hours ago...
I tried to hard reset to original MR2 state (without further removing slide view, panels etc whatsoever) and my X2 is more responsive and in lightning speed!
thanks
i really love this..its fantastic dude

Desire HD and SetCPU

Is there anyway to make setcpu works with my desire hd?
Visionary is working perfectly but I think perflock is blocking the speeds control. If I try to stop it with the menu command it gives me an error message.
Please If you find any solution post it... I'd like to save some Battery limiting the cpu frequencies
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
UPDATE yesterday. Working great. Battery life 30% more!
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Endr1 said:
UPDATE yesterday. Working great. Battery life 30% more!
Sent from my Desire HD using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
???????
Is it temporary, as you used Visionary?
Love_Velvet said:
Is it temporary, as you used Visionary?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since the update setcpu works perfectly with visionary. We DHD users can now disable perflock and control cpu frequency. Life is good.
If you set visionary to root your DHD on boot then you don't have any issues with things being "temporary". Well technically they are but you won't notice.
Have all installed on mine but i cant find a way to go above stock speed, is there a way to do this ?
Endr1 said:
Battery life 30% more!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What cpu frequency's are you setting in place to gain 30% more battery life?
Hi.
To use setcpu on the desire hd you should first root it with Visionary (set it to run on boot). Then you can dowload the app and launch it. When it has the root permission you should press the menu button on the main screen and use PERFLOCK disable. (set it ti run on boot too).
When perflock is disable setcpu take control of the clock speed.
My settings are:
When screen is off, speed is set to 245min-245max. this will grant you lot of spare juice from battery, only con is the 3 or 4 second lag when you turn the screen on. It needs some moments to put speed back to 1024. Not big deal if you get use to it.
Then when battery is under 50% I set it to 245min-768max. this will reduce the power need of the beast of a little 10%, means like 1,5h more standby time.
When power is under 20% I reduce the speed again to 245min-368max. In this config the phone react like my oldtime beloved hero...
I do not use the htc battery saving.
Hope it helps!
boarne71 said:
Have all installed on mine but i cant find a way to go above stock speed, is there a way to do this ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can not Overclock the stock Kernel.
Thank you for the post Endr1, quite interesting.
I can use SetCPU, I can manage profiles, but I cannot OC the device beyond the 1024 MHz
I have tried several CPU frequencies with SetCPU (very nice and simple tool, love it!) and noticed that overclocking the Desire HD to 1459MHz seems to be ideal. With higher OC speeds I do not get better performance (if I may believe Quandrant standard benchmarking tool).
I have LordMod kernel + CoreDroid v9.2 running.
Here you can see benchmark before OC
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And here after
Benchmarks have been run a few times to check if correct, and each time the score was around this so I consider it trusthworthy.
hello, what "governors" do you choose?

[Q] Anyone uses SETCPU with GT540?

Hi
Does anyone use SETCPU app with GT540? Does it make any improvements?
Or how to use it with our phones?
Thanks
Hi,
take a look at
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=871491
You need to install this kernel for some new mhz options.
Yes, it improves your phone.
Screenshot with standard CPU:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
And screenshot with 806 mhz:
Thank you for your replyç
So you use GT540 with 2.2 Openswift? how it is? also you use setcpu together? does it harm when we put it to 806 Mhz? Does it drain battery fast?
Also fixing the Mhz to 480 or 600 makes phone faster? Some people say that fixing the Mhz to 480 will make your phone faster...
DonPanda said:
Hi,
take a look at
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=871491
You need to install this kernel for some new mhz options.
Yes, it improves your phone.
Screenshot with standard CPU:
And screenshot with 806 mhz:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
spy1983 said:
Thank you for your replyç
So you use GT540 with 2.2 Openswift?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
spy1983 said:
how it is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Works well. Some little problems but over all very nice. It's still beta so i dont care if something works not as good as it can.
spy1983 said:
also you use setcpu together?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Together with what?
spy1983 said:
does it harm when we put it to 806 Mhz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For me it does. It's different to each phone and apps. Same for "how does i use my device?" If u play all time and watch YouTube videos, ofc it drains very fast. Didn't see any difference when i listen to music in backround.
spy1983 said:
Does it drain battery fast?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't say yes or no. U can choose some different profiles for SetCPU. For example: your phone screen turns off and SetCPU sets the CPU to 250Mhz. U can save a lot of battery.
spy1983 said:
Also fixing the Mhz to 480 or 600 makes phone faster? Some people say that fixing the Mhz to 480 will make your phone faster...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can not say somthing about this. I didn't use 480 or 600mhz. I went straight to 840. Ok, with 840 i've got some problems with reboot and crashes so i set 806 and this works fine for me.
please can someone tell me how to enter fastboot mode on gt540 ? I tried everthing but it didnt work, and yeah do you need fastboot to overclock this phone ? (btw sorry for my bad english)
Khkeyblade said:
please can someone tell me how to enter fastboot mode on gt540 ? I tried everthing but it didnt work, and yeah do you need fastboot to overclock this phone ? (btw sorry for my bad english)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
read this thread, there is most you need to know: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1032744
DonPanda said:
I can not say somthing about this. I didn't use 480 or 600mhz. I went straight to 840. Ok, with 840 i've got some problems with reboot and crashes so i set 806 and this works fine for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The best I've managed to get my phone running at is 825MHz but I'm sticking to 748MHz because it gives a reasonable compromise between battery life and performance.
I like to comprimise the battery life for the power, i charge every night so it dosnt matter to me
How accurate is the battery meter on 2.2? The battery meter on Swiftdroid is very unstable, which largely affects it by overclocking.

Best Quadrant Score?

Hey guys I was just wondering what's your best Quadrant score you've had on your HD2? I got what I think is a fairly high quadrant score today and I was fairly impressed.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
i think 2300 or 2700 somewhere in between
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
You beat my score!
johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not totally irrelevant, but sometimes close to it. Quadrant standard is useless, pro is a little better.
The problem with Quadrant is:
1) Disk IO test, if you try some of the builds with very high score you'll see it's coming from IO, you can just mount that one part that Quadrant use in RAM, get crazy high score, but that won't speed up any other apps/system as you still use your NAND/SD card
2) Video speed, as on early Darkstone builds video score was very low as that build had something turned off (because with it's ON there were other bugs), but all apps were using some other API for video, so only Quadrant was slow on it
3) Quadrant tests doesn't show real system performance, so higher score might have no increase in speed in other apps. For example you can put newest CPU on your PC, but having only 256mb RAM would make everything slow, no matter how fast your CPU is, but CPU score would be higher
This doesn't mean that Quadrant is bad, in my opinion if you're using pro version and you get some component score (for example CPU score) higher on one build then on other - that's good. If you get total score higher, build might be actually slower then other build with low score.
this is the old 1.32... at 1200mhz cedes sd build.
with the new 1.72... dhd base i get max 5000 cpu points and approx 5000 I/O points with data on ext4 partition. that makes 2400 overall quadrant points. at 998 mhz. but if i put all data to nand the I/O points are 1250, but the device feels faster and boots faster. for now i only put app folder on the ext4 partition, dalvik and data remain on internal memory. i am still testing whats the best combo, it takes lot of time
johncmolyneux said:
I don't know the reasoning behind it, but from what lots of others have said, Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. I can only assume it's because we're using ported software, rather than something that was built specifically for our devices. That's my guess anyway.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think your right there.
I don't use Quadrant much but i got over 3000 before (using Darkstones SUPERAM)
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Skellyyy said:
Mine was when I didn't even overclock the CPU.
Thought that was pretty good, I usually get about 1600.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
SuperNAND got about 4000.
Proof:
Someone beat this . Quadrant scores are garbage, it proves nothing.
jonny68 said:
thats not bad man what build do you have on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I'm on my phone right now I can't get the link but its the DHD build by Andrew something. Should be on the first page in the NAND forum.
Sent from my HTC HD2 using XDA App

Categories

Resources