Hi,
When anyone beam's a file via bluetooth to my I-mate a messege pops out of the file's being transfered. :roll:
Is there a way to know the Sender's Device name insted of the Files name ?? like the Nokia 6600 ?? :?:
I can't believe no one got an answer to this problem till now !!!!!!!! :shock:
that will depend on wether the sender unit has been named when it's BT system was setup.
not everyone knows or remembers/bothers to give the unit a name when first using the BT
that will depend on wether the sender unit has been named when it's BT system was setup.
not everyone knows or remembers/bothers to give the unit a name when first using the BT
that will depend on wether the sender unit has been named when it's BT system was setup.
not everyone knows or remembers/bothers to give the unit a name when first using the BT
that will depend on wether the sender unit has been named when it's BT system was setup.
not everyone knows or remembers/bothers to give the unit a name when first using the BT
Already checked that .. there is a name for both devices
Related
I have I-mate , and updated to ver 1.52 , i try to connect it with the BMW car bluetooth , they can see each other but the car can not bound the i-mate , any body try this , or is there a patch tor that.
any help
I'd like to...if anyone has a BMW 520i to donate i'll be willing to have a go!!
Sorry i couldn't be more helpful....i just couldn't resist.
Yes There is a solution Ali!!
First backup your device
Goto www.clubimate.com
Register Your device
Then you would head to the support section
And download the latest ROM upgrade which is approximately 40 MB
Upgrade your device since the new ROM is said to have a new fix for bluetooth.
And if this works ........ Please Donate !! (Just kidding !!)
if i am not mistaken, the bmw carkit is the same as the parrot ck3000...if so you have a problem (for the moment anyway)
the parrot ck3000 works with the handsfree profile of a bluetooth phone, and the xda2,qtek2020,i-mate and all the other names for our machine only works the headset-profile....it is no use of trying to upgrade the carkit, mine has the latest software, and still does not work...the upgrade has to come from your pda, that has to support the handsfree profile...as i heard, there should be one comming out in the first few months...let's hope...
thanks for the help
i update the i-mate before from the clubimate but as you said no help at all it is the same problem
if problem solved will donate sample bmw logo from the company
To ali:
Simply: NO WAY. Nor will BMW support you in any way: You will not get (in written) even the list of supported phones. They just claim it's lack of Bluetooth standardization (Wich is not completly false...).
BTW, I've found the hard way that BMW cars only support Handsfree profile (No headset), BUT, not on every phone model, and not all features....
If you are interested:
1- Ericsson and Sony-Ericsson T68 models: They work on the handsfree part of the Bonding, but you will not get your phone contact list automatically passed onto the car kit phone system. You may pass contacts one at a time (tedious and time consumming).
2- SE P800: My biggest disappointement, they do not even pair reliably, no contact list at all, connection breaks with no apparent reason.
3- Siemens S-55: The BMW preferred one (Both Germans, I guess....), to no avail. Same behaviour as SE T68, and although the contact list is supposed to be passed automatically it doesn't. When tried manually, it stops at about 6 or 7 contacts and the phone hangs.
4- XDAII: The BT part is SO POORLY implemented, it should have been even removed from the reviews on the forums.
is there some problem vith ms bluetooth stack, or just with my phone settings, but I cannot receive files from other phones via bluetooth? receiving over ic work superb.
I do not have a wizard but the Jasjar. Althought it may be obvious for you but I thought I should still post this because this is something which often confuses.
In order to receive files via bluetooth you must navigate to "start/settings/connections/beam and set a check mark in the box "receive all incoming beams".
I am not sure if this is exactly how it is in the wizard but maybe it helps.
Please do forgive me if this was something already known to you.
Regards
I dont know the exact cause of my problem, or yours. But i have had no sucess with sending and receiving files between a friends Magician & my wizard. All i have been able to pin this on is the M$ BT stack is poor and hopefully will be fixed in future ROMS. Hopefully your error is just a setting tho..
:?: I bought a BT WITH CALLER ID for the 9000 it is very good and works good with the phonetic calls ,the problem is in the recognition while it makes it recognizes the number it does not make such the name(like bt800) I believe that is subject of sofware appliance.
for me even if I only have bluetooth few hours the problem is that when it calls somebody it does not transport the number with the (+) from 9000 to bluetooth, examle. + 30210555555... but 302105555555.. in the screen with result when I want to take back the one who call me it says wrong number(my nokia 6600 and ericcson v800 that I tryed it plays with no problem so it is not subject bluetooth but the 9000).
i ask now if someone knows how can the 9000 would send (+) with number? :?: :!:
I thank you
and sorry for my bad english
If you are using a Jabra BT800, just update the firmware with the new release available on Jabra site, this known problem has been fixed!
Bye!
Hi Mastelos,
I just sent this as a PM to another user of the forum so I may as well post it here also.
I hope you're technical and understand 3GPP & BT specs!
I'm basing this on the fact that nobody has said they can receive the phonebook name to the BT headset. As such I guess it's a phone issue.
When a phonecall arrives at the mobile the caller ID (CLIP) is displayed from the modem with the command AT+CLIP. When the headset is alerted to the incoming call it sends AT+CLIP to the modem also. Now the response to AT+CLIP for the phone is defined in the 3GPP 27.007 specs as "+CLIP: <number>,<type>[,<subaddr>,<satype>[,[<alpha>][,<CLI validity>]]]". Only <number> & <alpha> are of interest here where <number> is the phone number and <alpha> is the representation (address book) of the number. I'm not sure where the <alpha> is taken from (SIM or phone memory) but I guess this is phone software implimentation.
The BT specs specify that the only response to AT+CLIP from the headset should be <number>. This is understandable as not every call you receive will have an <alpha> available. Because of this most phone software doesn't impliment it. Although the BT specs only specify <number> it doesn't restrict the other responses listed in the 27.007 document, specifically <alpha>. This is what SE and Nokia are doing. Their phone software to BT stack software has been written to add the <alpha> functionality to a BT headsets AT+CLIP request / responses. It appears HTC have not taken this step to add this functionality so this is why we don't get the name on the BT headset.
This is something which could be added in the future but I don't work for HTC so can't say (
Hope this explains all... Don't worry if you want to ask anything more.
Gavin.
ok thanks
if i understand well the name not appears is htc software thing ok until now but tell me please if it is the number (+) software thing
i try to explain better ,when i recieve a call a number appears in the bluetooth headset like 3021055....... when the headset is connected with other phone like my 6600 or v800 the number appears like this +3021055... with the result if i want to call back that number from the headset with 9000 i cant i need 9000 to send + with the number
hope you understand me hi hi
Panos
i do not have the bt800 i have this
http://www.mobilefun.co.uk/product/9275.htm
Hi Mastelos,
I understand your problem now. The post I added before was to do with names not appearing and not the '+'.
Ok, to start with both my SE HBH-200 and Parrot CK3100 BT devices show the numbers with the '+' OK so this is a headset issue. This is what is probably happening. The response to AT+CLIP should be: "+CLIP: <number>,<type>[,<subaddr>,<satype>[,[<alpha>][,<CLI validity>]]]"
<number> = Phone number of the caller - if not hidden
<type> = The type <number>. 129 for national and 145 if it has a '+'.
<alpha> = The phone's 'guess' of the name associated with that number.
What I suspect is happening is the Jabra is not identifying the <type> and thus thinking its response to AT+CLIP is a national number, i.e. without the '+'. This could be a formatting issue of the AT+CLIP response or it could be the Jabra has a bug (as mentioned by Wh1sp3r) which means it doesn't get the <type> and therefore doesn't display the '+'.
This is all a guess, albiet I work in this field so it's an eductated experienced guess, I don't have a Jabra to fully test and confirm.
Wh1sp3r has the best solution - get a SW update from the headset designer.
Thanks,
Gavin.
tnx Gavin for the reply
i saw the update of jabra bt800 for this problem but i have a v-three bth-8 headset . i send e-mail to both qtek and v-three the problem is that my headset works ok( the + symbol appears with all oter phones except qtek9000 )
tnx
GavinN said:
Hi Mastelos,
I understand your problem now. The post I added before was to do with names not appearing and not the '+'.
Ok, to start with both my SE HBH-200 and Parrot CK3100 BT devices show the numbers with the '+' OK so this is a headset issue. This is what is probably happening. The response to AT+CLIP should be: "+CLIP: <number>,<type>[,<subaddr>,<satype>[,[<alpha>][,<CLI validity>]]]"
<number> = Phone number of the caller - if not hidden
<type> = The type <number>. 129 for national and 145 if it has a '+'.
<alpha> = The phone's 'guess' of the name associated with that number.
What I suspect is happening is the Jabra is not identifying the <type> and thus thinking its response to AT+CLIP is a national number, i.e. without the '+'. This could be a formatting issue of the AT+CLIP response or it could be the Jabra has a bug (as mentioned by Wh1sp3r) which means it doesn't get the <type> and therefore doesn't display the '+'.
This is all a guess, albiet I work in this field so it's an eductated experienced guess, I don't have a Jabra to fully test and confirm.
Wh1sp3r has the best solution - get a SW update from the headset designer.
Thanks,
Gavin.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you get the caller name on your V-Three with an HTC device?
no name only number
Hello
unfortunatly the search didn't work for me to find a solution (maybe anybody can help me..)
i simply want to pair my Universal with my bluetooth gps receiver.
in settings/connections/bluetooth i added a new device.
it took a while, then it found my gps receiver and asked me for passkey. i used "1234" - but i am unsure, if that was the right key (i'm 80% sure..)
after that i got a new entry in the list of the avaible devices.
so far so good... BUT:
the gps receiver only appers as "disconnected". when i want to "connect" to it, it says "Your device did not connect with GP-700. The connection failed or the passcode is incorrect."
maybe the passcode is incorrect, ok. but i can't insert a new passkey, because it won't ask me for new entry after searching for new devices. i also can't delete the gps receiver entry.
I checked the box in "select services to use from this device. Serial Port". is that correct?
...hmmm it has to be so simple but i can't pair... gr......
please help me
nobody knows an answer...? ;((
hi, we maybe able to help but need more info as i would for sure. what rom are you using? and possibly what radio version? i use a bt gps with mine and passcode is 1234. not sure if thats the case for all though. depending on the rom im using mine shows as disconnected sometimes but i also have to create a valid com port to use with it. hope that helps.
Also what program are you using with you BT device? Mine pairs with '0000'.
If I use Route66, I don't even need to pair it.
When using iGo8, I do pair it.
When using Google Maps, I also need to add a COM port (I use 1 as some programs can't use 0 - eg, MemoryMaps).
Hey, thanks for answering my question.
i am using Tomal v8.90 (light). My radio version is (after unlocking) 0.00.00. Should i flash it back to 1.18? do i have disadvantages?
i wanted to use tomtom..
hope these information helps
I think there's your problem. I'd flash either 1.15 or 1.18 radio.
hm... anybody can help me..?
ThaMasterT said:
hm... anybody can help me..?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash an updated radio...1.15
i flashed to 1.15 succesfully.
i found out, that 1234 for my device is the right passkey.
i connected in connections/bluetooth to my device (like i wrote above) and it says "connection successful". after that my device is listed under "disconnected" again. furthermore i can't connect to it, when i click on "connect" in the settings. i can't connect to it in tomtom, too...
when i click on the device (listed under connection-settings in "disconnected") the partnership settings will be displayed. here i can select services to use from device. it provide me a list with one item to check: "serial port". but even if i check or if not, it wouldn't affect anything(?). i simply can't connect to my device...
hey,
i solved that problem. i choosed "the right" com port to use the receiver.
thats a little weird, cus i already choosed some random com ports before and it never worked for me. unfortunately i didn't get some useful error messages or something from tomtom or other programs. now i tried a different port again and suddenly it worked...
sorry for the trivial problem and thank you very much for helping me.
btw: the device is still listed as "disconnected" in settings. who the **** cares...
i have the tomtom gps mkii sirf III and i don't get it paired or manually connected either, but then, when i installed the tomtom software, i found out, that it does not need to be paired in the windows settings first. ok, you might say, this is a coincidence, because tomtom works fine with their own hardware, of course. but no! in my settings there is also an "external gps" point, and all you need to do is put in a proper port and speed and it'll work. the easiest test for that would be google maps. in the beginning i also worried about pairing and connecting, but i found that i didn't have to do that.
Hello,
anyone knows how to make the HTC Blackstone "look like" another telephone (in my case, a Motorola V3) when seen by Bluetooth devices?
I have a Mercedes Comand UHI telephone cradle with SAP for Motorola V3, that works even without physical connection to the telephone by Bluetooth pairing, but obviously when you attempt to pair it with another telephone it prevents you from doing this.
Is it possible to "copy" the Bluetooth device name of a V3 to the Blackstone?
Actually, I'm not very glad to give 280 extra euros to Mercedes for a more compliant BT cradle
Thanks!
the question is, how does the car know, what phone is trying to pair?
is it locked to 1 motorola v3, then it is probably the mac address.
you could try and simply try another bluetooth device name, but i doubt it would be that simple (since, on the one hand, everybody knows how to do that with any phone and on the other hand, changing a v3's name would stop it from being compatible).
and changing the actual bluetooth pairing id to make it appear as another phone type is (if possible) not only very hard to do, but also probably an fcc violation.
so instead, you should have a look, whether you can do something about the car part of this issue, probably, there are other people out there with a similar issue, that have any incompatible phone, probably more than there are in the blackstone section here.
The car knows what telephone you are trying to pair with probably by somehow reading from bluetooth the "model name" that you can read in "device information>identity" (I'm sorry if they aren't correct, I have the Italian software so I don't really knows how that menus are translated).
The MAC address is not important, you can pair any number of phones as long as they are V3!