Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Redmi 9 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
It's Not bad ? and perfect for an cheap phone !
Yes I can take it for a trip and make slefies to save
If you are an instagram influencer that needs absolute top-tier camera quality for selfies, this phone's camera may not be for you. However, if you will only use the camera for memories, it's good, there's wide lens, macro lens and slow-mo camera. They may not have the best quality, but it's very good for a budget phone.
macro is very good(5MP) considering the price.main camera is also good as it is only 13MP.it lacks details though.....
In my opinion the camera is not too bad for everyday use, but when we need it for photography purposes we still need to use an editing application because it lacks detail and sometimes there is visible noise.
Stock camera app produces mediocre photos without great clarity. With Gcam from Gcamator, photo sharpness and overall quality is highly improved on the main sensor. Night mode in gcam is far superior to miui night mode. Unfortunately gcam does not support use for the ultrawide or macro lenses (my macro camera is broken anyways, maybe that's why). I'd use gcam for normal photos, night mode photos and selfies. You'd be forced to use stock or some other 3rd party app for ultrawide, macro and other features such as panorama, slo-mo and timelapse as they arent supported on gcam.
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Xiaomi Poco X2 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Day time outdoor photography.
High res photos from the 64MP camera results in photos sized over 50MB (not uploaded here).
Low light outdoor photography.
Captured during an evening stroll around 6.30-7 PM.
Stock cam + LR
Stability
Does poco x2 have ois and eis?
AravOptimist said:
Does poco x2 have ois and eis?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No OIS. EIS yes
Night Mode on stock camera is unacceptable. Noisy, rough, lacking detail, and artifacts everywhere. I use Google Camera for almost everything except Video recording(because gcam port is not fully working yet). The sideways photo is from the stock camera.
8 out of 10
Camera hardware is there but software is lacking.
Image processing is good but it struggles in low-light.
Google camera shows what the hardware is capable of and it's very good. Front camera is also good, but still struggles in low-light. Also, beauty mode is on by default which is just ridiculous.
Yeah i have forgotten that stock application even exists. Lat time I was using miui, tha cam also had contrast and sharpness. It doesn't now. Gcam is quite good at pushing the limits
Which gcam are you all using?
Huge noise in night time shots unless you have a tripod and your object is stable.
I had a bad experience while clicking photos at my friend's birthday. I tried every settings to capture low light photos but every photo has noise and faces are blur like hell. Very disappointed.
SPWR1989 said:
GCAM SAMPLES can't remember what version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These pictures are great! Are you using the original stock rom or any custom rom?
The day I bought the phone, we took some pictures are we were very very happy with the picture quality. Then after one month I installed custom rom (EvolutionX / crDroid) and I noticed that the picture quality is not that great, not satisfactory . It doesn't matter which camera app I use, the result is not satisfactory.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LG V60 ThinQ come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I'm not a great photographer but the photos I've taken have been ok. The main complaint I have is how badly the lens skews the image on the edges. It's pretty bad.
I wish the world was in a better state and I wasn't sick so I could take more pic samples.
Wish this had spot metering. But LG as usual has had software that takes away from a good camera.
I love the results when using in the manual mode. The histogram is a big plus.
My main complaint is even upright my photos seem to end up being rotated.
LG Software still struggling "mosaic" post-production below average light condition, but night mode is quite good! Not app, just effects. Right now I'm testing some Gcam distros, from yesterday - UltraCVM prepared for Mi 9T (both of them works with 64mpx sensors).
Is there anyway to use 3d photos like on Facebook?
The main reason for the V60 is awesome manual photo/video controls. The phone does well for auto modes in good lighting, but they are still over aggressive with noise reduction that causes the water color effect (also apparent in the V20 I had prior, so this just how LG wants it). HDR works well, but doesn't always get the white balance right and wish I could use it while also having some manual control. I also wish they would've went with a straight up 16MP main sensor. Shooting at 64MP is no better than the binned 16MP option, and often worse.
I did "stress test" the camera the other day. I prefer long exposure photos and these were from a couple nights ago. I was limited on time and location, so pardon the motion blur in the light painting photos. But still... Let's see Gcam do this!
Couldn't you tell what sensor V60 camera is based on? Thnx
64 MP shots in bright outdoor settings are amazing on this phone. Definitely an underrated camera by most reviewers imo.
Random shots + Basic Snapseed correction.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Realme 6 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Photos are over sharpened. The loss of details are very noticeable. The front camera has this wierd effect where it makes the skin smooth even with the option turned off. A bit of over saturation too in some cases. Things improve a bit in the pro mode. HDR sometimes messes up the pictures. Didn't notice lag in camera interface. Installed the first OTA.
I will waiting live review to i am get overall about this phone camera
Hi
In my opinion photos are good but depending of chosen camera.
The standard pics are good, the telephoto ones are excellent, the wide angle acceptable, the 64Mpx are "you must see them by distance"...
Night pics with integrated app are acceptable, but even with tripod mode are dark in the very night; but with a more specialized camera (camera FV5 lite) i did 30 secs exposures and got acceptable pics of fireflies.
And there's also a wordking Gcam which can usa telephoto and wide angle cameras.
Personally i'm quite satisfied for the price range.
P.S. i had a OTA in middle may.
On a stock camera, the raw format is of poor quality. Strong vignette and strong pink tint all over the frame. The red channel is swamped. This is difficult to correct in raw converters. For example, on Moto G9 Plus (same basic module), raw is of better quality. The tech support sends it to the service center. Does this mean I have to take every device to a service center?
I propose to add to the "Expert" mode, as well as saving in raw and for telephoto lens.
Also in the "Expert" I propose to add a 64 megapixel mode with manual settings.
About noise modulation in the video, already all who care to write. But nothing changes. On the test RUI2.0 noise modulation is not fixed.
Realme 6 Pro for Russia.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Much better than I thought, and with the recent update giving the A71 5G the upscale camera options, you'd be hard pressed to find much fault. I'm loving the pictures I'm getting out of it on auto, and the manual controls are awesome. I've been able to pick out details in 64mpixels that have really surprised me when zooming in.
Seems good overall, but I'm a person who uses DSLR cameras.
Phones can never really capture what a DSLR can accomplish, especially if
you're using modern DSLR's.
If you can do everything a Canon EOS 50D and EOS 5D Mark IV can do with your phone,
then you've advanced a decade or more into what DSLRs are capable of.
Having said the above, here's my takeaway:
Image quality is overall excellent after pixel-peeping on my desktop's 4K monitors, which surprised me. Color accuracy, saturation and intensity seems to capture well. Contrast also appears accurately recorded.
Sharpness doesn't seem lacking, while noise also is impressively lacking under good lighting.
I've yet to try low-light conditions, so can't comment on that.
The ultrawide lens is actually very good. No doubt using software that's not visible, it produces an extremely good rectilinear image without a fisheye effect. I'd say it's wider than a 14mm lens on my full-frame Canon EOS 5D DSLR.
All in all, it's a higher-resolution output than my Canon S-series p&s camera, yet with similar picture detail and overall image quality.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Samsung Galaxy S21 / S21+ / S21 Ultra come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I would say the photography quality is very "meh." Pictures are quite grainy/noisy in all light settings when zoomed in. The front camera is especially noisy.
Loercase said:
I would say the photography quality is very "meh." Pictures are quite grainy/noisy in all light settings when zoomed in. The front camera is especially noisy.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree that photo quality from rear cameras are below my expectations - dirt cheap Pixel 4 makes much better photos in all regards. But I quite satisfied with selfie camera quality though. My concusion - don't buy this phone for camera quality only.
Same here. Very disappointing camera quality. But, it is OK anyway. Overall phone quality can compensate.
WarVic said:
I agree that photo quality from rear cameras are below my expectations - dirt cheap Pixel 4 makes much better photos in all regards. But I quite satisfied with selfie camera quality though. My concusion - don't buy this phone for camera quality only.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course sir.
Source: https://www.gsmarena.com/piccmp.php3?idType=5&idPhone1=10625&idCamera2=300639
install another camera app. the "open camera" app is add-free and you can adjust the quality of both pictures and video(4k30fps) way beyond the standard.