hello some developer could make a mod to increase hz of the screen of the xiaomi mi6 could do it in a lg g3 and a k20 could do it in the mi6 please I can pass my package if necessary :crying::crying:
:crying::crying:
No they wouldn't )) ips panels doesn't support it )))
Gnomchar said:
No they wouldn't )) ips panels doesn't support it )))
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's partially wrong, we can do overclocking in IPS panels, but it probably won't be as high since we need a really high quality display to reach high values on LCD.
Gnomchar said:
No they wouldn't )) ips panels doesn't support it )))
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, in theorically we can do that. IPS is LCD, and in PC IPS monitor, I overclocked 75 to 90 HZ without problem but the point is that is really clearly shows different in real life.
anticor248 said:
No, in theorically we can do that. IPS is LCD, and in PC IPS monitor, I overclocked 75 to 90 HZ without problem but the point is that is really clearly shows different in real life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Poco can reach up to 75Hz with patched dtb
:crying::crying:
Related
hey guy, i have a strange question but i bet with some guy that more PPI dependence by CPU strength and screen resolution, or not(??).
what i said that's more power of CPU, then more PPI u can get.(ofcourse the bet is about the Adreno 300)
can you explain me about that more if im right or not? :cyclops:
PPI is about the screen, how the screen is manufactured. Dimensions in pixels is dependent of processing power,CPU if software rasterizing, CPU+GPU if hardware rasterizer.
So a phone with 1080p and 300ppi performs the same as a phone with 1080p and 1000ppi
i think that its not ppi, but resolution is the blood sucker. more resolution, more details,more computing power. which demands greater cpu and gpu powers. and let me clear, large screen size does not necessarily mean greater resolutions. compare s4/z/one with some other devices like grand/mega etc.
also if a device have good resolution and better screen it should use more ppi, which in turn supports ur argument.
Sent from my NexusHD2 using xda premium
icecore said:
hey guy, i have a strange question but i bet with some guy that more PPI dependence by CPU strength and screen resolution, or not(??).
what i said that's more power of CPU, then more PPI u can get.(ofcourse the bet is about the Adreno 300)
can you explain me about that more if im right or not? :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PPI stands for pixels-per-inch. Pixels per inch is not the number of pixels; it's how crammed they are together. Resolution is the number of pixels. For example, even though the Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note 2 have the same resolution screen (ignore the fact that the S3's is pentile), the Galaxy S3 has a higher PPI because it has the pixels crammed into a smaller screen size (4.7 inch vs 5.5 inch). If the Galaxy S3 and Galaxy Note 2 had the same processor, RAM, etc, and only the screen size was different, they would perform identically. They both have the same amount of pixels, but the Galaxy S3 screen looks sharper because the screen is smaller.
What strains the processor is a higher resolution, not directly a high PPI. It's the same thing with a computer; if I run Crysis at 640 x 480 (the lowest possible resolution), I'll probably get an amazing frame rate (smoothness) even though the picture will look like crap. Why? The processor and graphics card have to process less pixels to display on the screen. Now, if I ran the game at 1080p, the frame rate would suffer dramatically, but the picture quality would look amazing. The processor and graphics card now have a LOT more to display on the screen. That's the gist of it.
got it thanks for all replays!
Just saw this:
http://www.androidauthority.com/note-3-display-review-brightness-display-mate-278726/
http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note3_ShootOut_1.htm
Is this legit or did Samsung give them a super-model for their lab test? I like to believe it, but it sounds a bit of a stretch...
The Note 3’s is extremely bright. According to DisplayMate’s testing, the Note 3 is 55 percent brighter than the Note 2 and 25 percent brighter than the Galaxy S4. The Note 3 performs better than or comparable to “most LCD displays in this size class”. With Automatic Brightness on, the Note 3’s display reaches an impressive 660 cd/m2, which is the highest value that DisplayMate ever recorded. For comparison, the iPhone 5, long considered a standard in display quality, outputs 600 cd/m2.
DisplayMate praises the user selectable color modes of the Note 3, noting that the Professional Photo mode delivers a “fairly accurate calibration to the Adobe RGB standard, which is rarely available in consumers displays”.
The reflectance levels on the Note 3 are very low, which, along with the high brightness, improves readability under intense ambient light. The Note 3 has the highest “Contrast Rating for High Ambient Light” that the company ever measured.
At viewing angles of 30 degrees, the display loses just 22 percent of its brightness, compared to 55 percent or greater in the case of a typical LCD display.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Super model huh??
have u bothered reading displaymate review :cyclops:
yahyoh said:
Super model huh??
have u bothered reading displaymate review :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.. what do their reviews say?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using xda app-developers app
danieljamie said:
No.. what do their reviews say?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note3_ShootOut_1.htm
yahyoh said:
Super model huh??
have u bothered reading displaymate review :cyclops:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have something meaningful to say? I'm just wondering how an OLED display can be brighter than an LCD one (by nature of the technology used, LCDs are brighter).
From gsmarena:
The Super AMOLED panel on the Galaxy Note 3 isn't the brightest we've seen and it's inferior to the Galaxy S4 in this department. However in most cases you won't notice this in practice unless you pit the Note 3 side by side with an HTC One or iPhone 5.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This seem to contradict Displaymate's review.
MohJee said:
Do you have something meaningful to say? I'm just wondering how an OLED display can be brighter than an LCD one (by nature of the technology used, LCDs are brighter).
From gsmarena:
This seem to contradict Displaymate's review.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure where you got that info from. Personally, i'd go for numbers from displaymate over gsmarena.
For reference, Displaymate's Measured Peak Brightness numbers are:
Galaxy SIII: 283 cd/m2
Galaxy Note II: 353 cd/m2
Galaxy S4: 475 cd/m2
iPhone 5: 556 cd/m2
Galaxy Note 3: 660 cd/m2
gsmarena don't have any actual numbers.
skally said:
Not sure where you got that info from. Personally, i'd go for numbers from displaymate over gsmarena.
For reference, Displaymate's Measured Peak Brightness numbers are:
Galaxy SIII: 283 cd/m2
Galaxy Note II: 353 cd/m2
Galaxy S4: 475 cd/m2
iPhone 5: 556 cd/m2
Galaxy Note 3: 660 cd/m2
gsmarena don't have any actual numbers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, they do. It's on page 2. They've put them in a table and everything, so it must be legit, right?
Anyways, I think I figured out the disparity between the two sites. Gsmarena measured brightness at manual brightness setting at 50% and 100% setting. Displaymate measured it on Autobrightness to achieve c660 cd/m2. So, assuming this is correct, Note3 can achieve far higher brightness levels on its Auto brightness than adjusting the brightness manually.
MohJee said:
Anyways, I think I figured out the disparity between the two sites. Gsmarena measured brightness at manual brightness setting at 50% and 100% setting. Displaymate measured it on Autobrightness to achieve c660 cd/m2. So, assuming this is correct, Note3 can achieve far higher brightness levels on its Auto brightness than adjusting the brightness manually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if they do that so people don't jack up the brightness too far and leave it there and burn out their AMOLED screen too fast. Meanwhile auto-brightness goes into asskicking mode when in bright sun but then comes back down to sustainable levels as soon as possible.
redpill2016 said:
I wonder if they do that so people don't jack up the brightness too far and leave it there and burn out their AMOLED screen too fast. Meanwhile auto-brightness goes into asskicking mode when in bright sun but then comes back down to sustainable levels as soon as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This does actually sound like a plausible explanation..
Sent from my SM-N9005 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
redpiit2016 said:
I wonder if they do that so people don't jack up the brightness too far and leave it there and burn out their AMOLED screen too fast. Meanwhile auto-brightness goes into asskicking mode when in bright sun but then comes back down to sustainable levels as soon as possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read that it was set that way so people didn't drain their battery very quickly.
Laptop reviews also has the screen measured as the brightest ever for a mobile device...just saying
MohJee said:
Actually, they do. It's on page 2. They've put them in a table and everything, so it must be legit, right?
Anyways, I think I figured out the disparity between the two sites. Gsmarena measured brightness at manual brightness setting at 50% and 100% setting. Displaymate measured it on Autobrightness to achieve c660 cd/m2. So, assuming this is correct, Note3 can achieve far higher brightness levels on its Auto brightness than adjusting the brightness manually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you trust GSMarena which don't have tool or experts to do these kind of testings over trusted corporation which main job is optimizing, calibrating, testing, evaluating and comparing all types of displays, monitors, projectors, mobile displays, HDTVs, and all display technologies, such as LCD, OLED, 3D, LED, LCoS, Plasma, DLP and CRT
Cool
I doubt it has the brightest screens of all cellphones out there. The WhiteMagic screen of the Sony Xperia P is over 800nits.
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
MohJee said:
Actually, they do. It's on page 2. They've put them in a table and everything, so it must be legit, right?
Anyways, I think I figured out the disparity between the two sites. Gsmarena measured brightness at manual brightness setting at 50% and 100% setting. Displaymate measured it on Autobrightness to achieve c660 cd/m2. So, assuming this is correct, Note3 can achieve far higher brightness levels on its Auto brightness than adjusting the brightness manually.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I said. They don't have a number for auto brightness, which is the only way to measure max brightness
Any news about VR?
I've used daydream with booth normal Pixel an the higher resolution XL and can live with just HD.
Skickat från min SM-G950F via Tapatalk
dondavis007 said:
Any news about VR?
I've used daydream with booth normal Pixel an the higher resolution XL and can live with just HD.
Skickat från min SM-G950F via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I hear is that OP5 won't have daydream just because the screen is IPS-LCD, not AMOLED like Pixel or Pixel XL. Daydream only enable by Google when the phone use 2K AMOLED screen. IPS-LCD won't get any even it has the same resolution.
So, probably OP5 won't feature any Daydream.
No amoled? Are you sure? Are they going to sell a much more expensive handset with no amoled? That would be a huge mistake! I'm really willing to buy one, but with no amoled I won't do it!
mamatgiler94 said:
... because the screen is IPS-LCD, not AMOLED ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's the first time I've read any source claim that the screen wouldn't be AMOLED, so what's your source? Whether the phone has QHD seems to be in grave doubt though. Next week and all will be revealed.
mamatgiler94 said:
All I hear is that OP5 won't have daydream just because the screen is IPS-LCD, not AMOLED like Pixel or Pixel XL. Daydream only enable by Google when the phone use 2K AMOLED screen. IPS-LCD won't get any even it has the same resolution.
So, probably OP5 won't feature any Daydream.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OP5 will definitely have an AMOLED, dont worry
It will be an amoled, it might just be 1080p tho...
It will most probably have the same screen as Oppo R11 which is a 5.5" Full HD AMOLED. I'm so very disappointed. This OP3 screen is horrible in VR -- it's slow, the pixels are huge, there's the glow that shouldn't be there...
It has 401 pixels per inch, which a bit lower than HTC Vive & Oculus Rift at 455.63 PPI which both felt way too pixelated for me when I tried them. I returned the Vive for that reason, VR content was not enjoyable at all. Samsung Gear VR with the S8 is more acceptable and with that I can see the stuff on screen better and I don't have to go very close to the objects like with Vive & Rift & OP3. The new Pixels should have 2K+ screens AND be faster to meet the Daydream specs, so I'll personally just wait for those and go test when they come out...
These HMD's for Windows Mixed Reality have screens that have much more usable PPI at 704.66: http://www.tomshardware.com/news/acer-hp-windows-mixed-reality-dev-kits,34389.html
1440x1440 resolution, 2.89" size, 90 hz refresh rate..they're most probably LCD, though, not AMOLED, so it remains to be seen how good they are for VR/AR/MR.
TL;DR: If the OP5 had a 2K screen it would have 33% better pixel density which would vastly improve VR usage over 1080p. Better to wait for the new Pixels if you're like me and would love to use mobile VR
Hey guys, Does anyone know about the Daydream support for OP 5? Before it was just speculations, now the phone has launched does anyone have any update regarding this topic? I have searched the net but no one has mentioned anything about VR. Infact no one has covered this point in their review etc.
Thanks!
sunnyhj said:
Hey guys, Does anyone know about the Daydream support for OP 5? Before it was just speculations, now the phone has launched does anyone have any update regarding this topic? I have searched the net but no one has mentioned anything about VR. Infact no one has covered this point in their review etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No one covered because there is no official support. Officially the OP5 is not compatible with Daydream, and OP does not sound interested. It is unknown (at least to me) if this phone covers one of the requirements: a surface temperature sensor. Since the main purpose of the OP line is to provide best processor/memory for less price, is likely that this sensor is absent.
That being said, there is a thread about how to force a rooted OP3T to support Daydream. Should be the same with OP5.
Hey guys. I've got a A2017 and AIDA64 says 68mm*122mm , 5.5" , 534dpi(xxxhdpi) but Cpu z says 5.46" , 537dpi.
Gsmarena says 5.5", 82.2 cm2 , 538 ppi but Phonearena says 5.5" , 534 ppi.
I already know that on the same resolution the higher the pixel density is , the lower the screen size will be.
I've also seen on the link below that AIDA64 shows 5.5"(534 dpi) for A2017 and A2017U and shows 5.46"(538 dpi , 68mm*121mm ) for A2017G.
https://community.zteusa.com/discussion/12161/axon-7-differences-between-models
So which one is the most accurate and real one for each variant?
rickjss said:
Hey guys. I've got a A2017 and AIDA64 says 68mm*122mm , 5.5" , 534dpi(xxxhdpi) but Cpu z says 5.46" , 537dpi.
Gsmarena says 5.5", 82.2 cm2 , 538 ppi but Phonearena says 5.5" , 534 ppi.
I already know that on the same resolution the higher the pixel density is , the lower the screen size will be.
I've also seen on the link below that AIDA64 shows 5.5"(534 dpi) for A2017 and A2017U and shows 5.46"(538 dpi , 68mm*121mm ) for A2017G.
https://community.zteusa.com/discussion/12161/axon-7-differences-between-models
So which one is the most accurate and real one for each variant?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May I ask, what for?
I'll look into it now. There was a way to get the panel ID from the system with a command
Choose an username... said:
May I ask, what for?
I'll look into it now. There was a way to get the panel ID from the system with a command
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks I would appreciate if you do. I would just want to compare different variants of this phone.
rickjss said:
Thanks I would appreciate if you do. I would just want to compare different variants of this phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope didn't work, I can't find a spec sheet everywhere. The model is S6E3HA3. Back in the day, someone found that another phone came with different screens, so they made an XDA article about it, and someone made a thread here asking to run a line on the terminal to see the screen model. Many people tried and it was the same for all of them (including me).
The thingy outputs zteSAM_S6E3HA3_SAM_25601440_5P5Inch
I'm planning to buy this phone but the Red magic 3 has a 90hz display and 5000mah battery which is quite appealing to me. But black shark 2 has 240hz touch sensing, magic touch and supports video output through usb-c to hdmi. . . (I'm planning to stream games), could someone help me what's the best choice to make?? I don't wanna have regrets, what do you guys think is better? 240hz touch sensing or 90hz display??
Black shark software support is horrid. No custom ROMs or recovery even exist yet. Go with the red magic 3. If I had know this from the start I would have avoided black shark
Clark.H said:
I'm planning to buy this phone but the Red magic 3 has a 90hz display and 5000mah battery which is quite appealing to me. But black shark 2 has 240hz touch sensing, magic touch and supports video output through usb-c to hdmi. . . (I'm planning to stream games), could someone help me what's the best choice to make?? I don't wanna have regrets, what do you guys think is better? 240hz touch sensing or 90hz display??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Global pubg doesn't support 90 and 120 fps. It's useless to have 90 hz with only 60 fps. You can unlock fps by gfx tools with a small risk of ban, but even gaming smartphones can drop fps to 20 like Asus rog... I bought shark 2 and trust me that display is amazing. You should take 240 hz touch over 90 hz screen. Master touch is not that perfect as it looks like but still decent. Battery on auto last 4h of playing pubg.