This week j4+ & j6+ gets one ui with android pie both device have quad core Snapdragon 425 soc so is it possible to port the rom for j5 2015 which is also have quad core processor plz tell me.
#imavi said:
This week j4+ & j6+ gets one ui with android pie both device have quad core Snapdragon 425 soc so is it possible to port the rom for j5 2015 which is also have quad core processor plz tell me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats MSM8917 SOC not msm8916 so I doubt it.
Msm8917 has a snapdragon 425 whereas the j5 has a snapdragon 410
#imavi said:
This week j4+ & j6+ gets one ui with android pie both device have quad core Snapdragon 425 soc so is it possible to port the rom for j5 2015 which is also have quad core processor plz tell me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's impossible, unless Samsuck did develop and release it for SD410 chipsets and then some developers will have a hard time working for a port of it (which I highly doubt). Not even TouchWiz Oreo (and its ports) for SD410 exist, especially for SM-J500x.
Related
Samsung has just announced an enhanced version of its Exynos 5 Octa chipset.
Currently the Octa chipset is available only on the I9500 Galaxy S4 flagship.
The second generation Exynos 5 Octa might be called Exynos Evolved and it will be more powerful, enhanced Exynos 5 Octa".
Speculation calls for the new chip to be the Samsung Exynos 5420 and will feature a higher clock speed along with improved optimization for the 8 integrated cores.
Stay tuned for more news next week:highfive:
They really shouldn't call it octa cores and it doesn't have a solid 8 cores. It has a 4x2 core structure.. With two solid four core processors, not one eight core one.
Wrong forum,It's galaxy S3 forum section,Exynos 4 not 5.
Theshawty said:
They really shouldn't call it octa cores and it doesn't have a solid 8 cores. It has a 4x2 core structure.. With two solid four core processors, not one eight core one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It has 8 cores inside it, might as well call it octa
Glebun said:
It has 8 cores inside it, might as well call it octa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. Read here The HMP processing does require all the 8 cores available online.
Misconception #6: Yes the CPU is a true 8-core processor. It's just not being used a such in its initial software implementations
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
More from Andrei:
AndreiLux said:
The to-be-announced new processor is the 5420, it's not a new revision of the 5410. It has the same target clocks as the 5410 but with a properly working CCI to be able to use GTS, and the GPU is replaced with a new generation Mali T62X instead of the SGX 544. It also has some other miscellaneous updates like VP9 encoder/decoder. It'll debut in the new Chromebook this fall.I already know the differences. In any case - it's not useful in regard to the 5410.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thread has nothing to do with s3
Closed
Why GT-I9505 is faster than GT-I9500 if it's a quad core? Apparently I'm lucky enough that GT-I9505 is even cheaper than GT-I9500 in the Motherland marketplace.
Also, is there anything that I need to check before purchasing? I can open the box, check what's on it, etc etc before buying it. Is there any fault I should check? Like S2 has few faulty models with bad chipset and you can check that easily before purchasing.
afaik the 9505 model has a Qualcomm 600 or 800, both in my opinion are better than Samsung's octa core. And besides only 4 cores are running at a time on the octa core.
It's more like two quad cores than eight concurrent cores. The one in the i9505 is faster.
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
You guys are forgetting 3 things
1.the octa core s4 has a cortex a-15 quad core as the bigger core which is way faster than the Qualcomm one as the Qualcomm one is a9
2.there might be lags in overall animations but benchmark wise the octa core beats the quad core to the ground
3.if u guys really wanna see which ones better.wait for a stable AOSP ROM for i9500 and then compare
Wait n see how smooth n fast the i9500 actually is without Samsung's crapware
varund7726 said:
You guys are forgetting 3 things
1.the octa core s4 has a cortex a-15 quad core as the bigger core which is way faster than the Qualcomm one as the Qualcomm one is a9
2.there might be lags in overall animations but benchmark wise the octa core beats the quad core to the ground
3.if u guys really wanna see which ones better.wait for a stable AOSP ROM for i9500 and then compare
Wait n see how smooth n fast the i9500 actually is without Samsung's crapware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I9500 is one of Samsung biggest failure, they rushed to launch it with their "octa" core, and they released an unfinished product with flaws.
I9505 it is faster after newer updates, and btw i9505 has OpenGL ES 3.0, i9500 doesn't.
So games will run smoother and with better graphics on Android 4.3+ on the i9505.
They're both great devices, but Samsung really fwcked up with i9500
varund7726 said:
You guys are forgetting 3 things
1.the octa core s4 has a cortex a-15 quad core as the bigger core which is way faster than the Qualcomm one as the Qualcomm one is a9
2.there might be lags in overall animations but benchmark wise the octa core beats the quad core to the ground
3.if u guys really wanna see which ones better.wait for a stable AOSP ROM for i9500 and then compare
Wait n see how smooth n fast the i9500 actually is without Samsung's crapware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. yes, octa core has A15 Quad Core, as the big core. but the qualcomm one has Krait cores, based on A15, not A9 .
2. i do not know this, benchmark doesn't reflect real life usage.
3. hope so
varund7726 said:
You guys are forgetting 3 things
1.the octa core s4 has a cortex a-15 quad core as the bigger core which is way faster than the Qualcomm one as the Qualcomm one is a9
2.there might be lags in overall animations but benchmark wise the octa core beats the quad core to the ground
3.if u guys really wanna see which ones better.wait for a stable AOSP ROM for i9500 and then compare
Wait n see how smooth n fast the i9500 actually is without Samsung's crapware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I lost my trust in Samsung Exynos processor due to the Mali issues in I9300 which make the development of I9300 way slower than the USA's S3. It took CM team so long to get a stable build out of it.
Anyway the good thing about the I9505 over the I9500 and for me even the Note 3 is having a Google Edition. At least porting new Android versions from I9505G to I9505 is easier and faster access to updates.
Dean-xXx said:
I9500 is one of Samsung biggest failure, they rushed to launch it with their "octa" core, and they released an unfinished product with flaws.
I9505 it is faster after newer updates, and btw i9505 has OpenGL ES 3.0, i9500 doesn't.
So games will run smoother and with better graphics on Android 4.3+ on the i9505.
They're both great devices, but Samsung really fwcked up with i9500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude ...adreno 320 GPU doesn't support all features of open gl es3.0
It just does it for namesake
And that GPU is way too old
Whereas powervr 544 is the same one used in phone 5 I guess which is like a 100 times faster than adreno
varund7726 said:
Dude ...adreno 320 the doesn't support all features of open gl es3.0
It just does it for namesake
And that GPU is way too old
Whereas powervr 544 is the same one used in phone 5 I guess which is like a 100 times faster than adreno
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhm the Adreno 320 is actually as powerful as the powerVR SGX544 MP3 even if its running at a slightly lower clock speed... Ive hit 21 fps in gfxbench T-Rex and 52 in egypt Offscreen so its definitely not weak... Its also much more power efficient... I can play asphalt 8 using the performance governor for a good 3 hours straight easily...
Dean-xXx said:
I9500 is one of Samsung biggest failure, they rushed to launch it with their "octa" core, and they released an unfinished product with flaws.
I9505 it is faster after newer updates, and btw i9505 has OpenGL ES 3.0, i9500 doesn't.
So games will run smoother and with better graphics on Android 4.3+ on the i9505.
They're both great devices, but Samsung really fwcked up with i9500
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Qualcomm's processors sucks monkey balls. Its the GPU that is pretty that too only at supporting new APIs.
Imagination have pushed an API Extension which will enable OpenGL ES 3.0 key features.
http://www.imgtec.com/News/Release/index.asp?NewsID=717
varund7726 said:
Dude ...adreno 320 GPU doesn't support all features of open gl es3.0
It just does it for namesake
And that GPU is way too old
Whereas powervr 544 is the same one used in phone 5 I guess which is like a 100 times faster than adreno
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The GPU in the iPhone 5 is the PowerVR SGX 543MP3 not 544
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Hazerm said:
The GPU in the iPhone 5 is the PowerVR SGX 543MP3 not 544
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ya the 544 is a version higher
but still
have u seen the gaming performance on it??!wayy better than the adreno...
varund7726 said:
ya the 544 is a version higher
but still
have u seen the gaming performance on it??!wayy better than the adreno...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're talking about the gaming performance on the iPhone 5 compared to the adreno, forget it. IOS has more optimised gaming apps and I'm not too sure if you can get 60fps on the octa core S4 in asphalt 8 either. Hmmmm...
Sent from my GT-I9505 using xda app-developers app
Simple question, I purchased a Moto G GPE and its on its way but i have the curiosity about how the SOC Snapdragon 400 Cuad Core compares to something like the S4 Pro that was in the Nexus 4 which ran great. I know its a newer chip but i havent found any real evidence whether the architecture is superior or inferior to the S4 Pro since it was a flagship chip but the 400 is budget. Anyone has any insight on this? Thanks.
best way to compare the two.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)
mike21pr said:
Simple question, I purchased a Moto G GPE and its on its way but i have the curiosity about how the SOC Snapdragon 400 Cuad Core compares to something like the S4 Pro that was in the Nexus 4 which ran great. I know its a newer chip but i havent found any real evidence whether the architecture is superior or inferior to the S4 Pro since it was a flagship chip but the 400 is budget. Anyone has any insight on this? Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Snapdragon 400 is positioned more like S4 Plus, not Pro. As in marketing positioning.
Speaking in technical terms however, those two SoCs have a completely differnet architecture. S4 Plus always has Krait cores, while our S400 has Cortex-A7 cores, which is generally somewhat slower than Krait, partially because Krait is an Out-of-Order architecture, while Cortex-A7 is In-Order.
In terms of cores S4 Plus always had two cores (up to 1,5 GHz), while our S400 has four cores @ 1,2 GHz.
Now go figure what´s faster. I´d personally prefer two Kraits
Note: Qualcom had really messed up the naming in S400 series as the chips can contain either two Krait cores or four Cortex-A7 cores. Don´t get me wrong, Cortex-A7 is a great architecture , mostly because its performance/power consumption ratio, but the SoCs containg those cores should have been labeled as Snapdragon 350 or something like that.
Hi, the Galaxy A5 2016 sports an Snap 615 and our S4 i9505 sports an Snap 600, I want to know if it can be ported a rom, or from S5, because an 6.0.1 TW rom from S5 is running in S4 I9506 that it has an Snap 800, and S5 sports an 801.
Thankss for your attention.
Have a nice day.
I think the 615 chip is a hexacore processor, at the very least you'd need a new kernel. I'm not a dev though so I've no idea if it looks like something worthwhile trying relative to the effort required.
pepelino123 said:
Hi, the Galaxy A5 2016 sports an Snap 615 and our S4 i9505 sports an Snap 600, I want to know if it can be ported a rom, or from S5, because an 6.0.1 TW rom from S5 is running in S4 I9506 that it has an Snap 800, and S5 sports an 801.
Thankss for your attention.
Have a nice day.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yet. Not all A5 2016 variants bring Snapdragon 615 SoCs. A5 2016 variant that available in my country is SM-A510FD, where it brings Exynos 7580 instead of Snapdragon 615. It makes everything difficult.
3mel said:
I think the 615 chip is a hexacore processor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's an octa-core processor.
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/615
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
krasCGQ said:
Yet. Not all A5 2016 variants bring Snapdragon 615 SoCs. A5 2016 variant that available in my country is SM-A510FD, where it brings Exynos 7580 instead of Snapdragon 615. It makes everything difficult.
It's an octa-core processor.
https://www.qualcomm.com/products/snapdragon/processors/615
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but from 615 can be ported?
It also is from Snap 600 series (600, 615)...
pepelino123 said:
Thanks, but from 615 can be ported?
It also is from Snap 600 series (600, 615)...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would just refer to @3mel's post...
That you'll need a modified kernel in order to work. Just like Motion ROM that ported from Galaxy S5 Mini to Galaxy Grand 2 and S3 Neo.
If it's ported from same processor family (like Snapdragon 801 to Snapdragon 800 phone or Exynos 5420 -G900H- to Exynos 5410 -i9500- phone like OzcanROM for i9500) there is no need to port the kernel too.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
krasCGQ said:
I would just refer to @3mel's post...
That you'll need a modified kernel in order to work. Just like Motion ROM that ported from Galaxy S5 Mini to Galaxy Grand 2 and S3 Neo.
If it's ported from same processor family (like Snapdragon 801 to Snapdragon 800 phone or Exynos 5420 -G900H- to Exynos 5410 -i9500- phone like OzcanROM for i9500) there is no need to port the kernel too.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, thanks for your answer and your attention.
Have a nice day.
hello
i am thinking about buying a samsung Galaxy S7 Edge but i am unsure whether to buy the (G9350) model or (G935FD) model
as what i have searched the (G9350) has Quad-Core processor of two processors 2.15Ghz Dual-Core Kryo and 1.6Ghz Dual-Core Kryo
and the (G935FD) has Octa-Core processor of two processors 2.3Ghz Quad-Core Exynos M1 Mongoose1.6Ghz Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A53
i think the processor in the (G935FD) model is better, is this true??
thanks in advance
dipharoh said:
hello
i am thinking about buying a samsung Galaxy S7 Edge but i am unsure whether to buy the (G9350) model or (G935FD) model
as what i have searched the (G9350) has Quad-Core processor of two processors 2.15Ghz Dual-Core Kryo and 1.6Ghz Dual-Core Kryo
and the (G935FD) has Octa-Core processor of two processors 2.3Ghz Quad-Core Exynos M1 Mongoose1.6Ghz Quad-Core ARM Cortex-A53
i think the processor in the (G935FD) model is better, is this true??
thanks in advance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Plz ..go for G935FD
Perforamnce is great
Fd man
Hi there!!!!
Dont know if im posting this in the right forum or not....
Anyway I just got Galaxy s7 edge fd...
Transferred all my apps from my Galaxy S5 BUT I just noticed that my System ROM is almost full (209MB free out of 4.40 GB).... This is very odd...
FYI my device is rooted...
Thanks in advance
Sent from my S5 SM-G900F using Tapatalk 4 - Hassan K. Malik