My stock camera brightness is too high when launched like it goes to Max brightness. Does anyone faces it too? Also pictures are very dull
Yes me too.
princex007 said:
Yes me too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why does the camera brightness gets too high. Should i ask for replacement
Jeet711 said:
why does the camera brightness gets too high. Should i ask for replacement
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope. The stock camera overides the manual brightness settings to create a better preview of the picture you are taking.
---------- Post added at 05:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:41 PM ----------
Jeet711 said:
My stock camera brightness is too high when launched like it goes to Max brightness. Does anyone faces it too? Also pictures are very dull
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The pictures are not appearing dull, its because you are viewing at lower brightness settings in the gallery.
Related
Try this free app
Its screen filter which adds blackness to the screen
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.haxor&hl=en
Now optimise blackness in that app and brightness in ur display setings..You will have significant improvement improvement in colours and blackness.
Pic
the pic looks crappy here but looks bright in display
Sent from my C6602 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
I have used and posted this before , problem is it dims the colors , however its a battery drain app.. it eats alot of battery... thanks for sharing anyway..
---------- Post added at 01:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:11 PM ----------
similar one..https://play.google.com/store/apps/...29tLmxhYnMucXVhbnRhdGl2ZS5zY3JlZW5maWx0ZXIiXQ..
Hey fellow Z1 owners. I have a question about the camera and maybe I am doing it completely wrong. I noticed that when I take pictures, they don't really come out that sharp, in superior auto or full manual. Below is an example.
As you can see on my dog's body, the fur looks like a flat, smudgy mess while in real life those are each individual hairs. Is it something to do with the camera software and pixel binning or is it my crap photo skills?
When I compare some of the pictures taken with my Nexus 5, I notice that the hairs can easily be defined and pictures are generally less noisy. Any help or insite would be appreciated. Running .290.
This picture is from the Nexus 5. As you can see, more detail and less noise. This is mindboggling to me.
The picture looks fine to me. It has that distinct "Sony" skin smoothing effect.
I assume that the lighting conditions are less than optimal? It could just be the aggressive image processing from Sony. Did you try a different camera app?
More the ISO is, more you will have this "effect".
hcloud said:
The picture looks fine to me. It has that distinct "Sony" skin smoothing effect.
I assume that the lighting conditions are less than optimal? It could just be the aggressive image processing from Sony. Did you try a different camera app?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The lighting conditions arent "optimal' but they certainly arent LOW light. I noticed a lot of pictures have this smoothing effect reducing detail. Will a different app help this at all?
Try to take pictures on manual 8mp. 4x3 and use landscape as seen that helps me in some conditions
And don't use auto mode results won't be that good
sent from my 6903 using tapatalk
---------- Post added at 07:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:27 PM ----------
20 mp. Manual :
8mp. Manual scene:lanscape
Auto:
The 8mp landscape's colours do look most like the original
sent from my 6903 using tapatalk
izzet3838 said:
Try to take pictures on manual 8mp. 4x3 and use landscape as seen that helps me in some conditions
And don't use auto mode results won't be that good
sent from my 6903 using tapatalk
---------- Post added at 07:35 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:27 PM ----------
20 mp. Manual :
8mp. Manual scene:lanscape
Auto:
The 8mp landscape's colours do look most like the original
sent from my 6903 using tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you put them up on dropbox or flickr where we can examine the exifs.
,......
I'm planning to pick up a G6 this Friday to replace my G5. But I'm slowly becoming aware of the camera issues that are being posted. Is this something you think will get addressed with a software update, or should I wait a few weeks for the S8 even though I'm not a big fan of curved screens?
Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
What camera issues? Mine has been working great.
I've got no issues at all. I LOVE the camera. Even in auto mode it's amazing. Really really happy that they got rid of the laser focus. Photo attached is no editing just wide angle and hand held
There's a thread titled "LG G6: Is it worth buying?" where a bunch of people are talking about the bad camera quality.
Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
There's no camera issue, it's just not as great a camera as it should be. If you take photos in wide angle they are superb, but single lens shots are sub parts. It's digital processing is awful. Hopefully there's an update to fix.
Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
how's it compare to the GS7? I just pulled the trigger the other day and it's coming tomorrow. I could not find any full review articles or videos on youtube with the final software and hardware version. I wanted to see comparisons to the GS7. I finally got tired of waiting for reviews and went ahead and ordered it. Hope i made the right decision. I'm pretty picky about cameras.
I love the camera one thing I really really love is auto focus is much better than the lg g4 was. Also love that just tapping a a different spot on camera can easily adjust the exposure while maintaining a full frame focus. I'm the pictures at times from the gs7 may appear better but it also depends on what device they are being viewed on. I mean if I watch 1080 videos on my low end barely HD monitor th3 comparisons are useless. Sadly not enough pictures ever get printed. Plus wide angle for the win. Sample quick take from the beach on sunday.
ledvedder said:
There's a thread titled "LG G6: Is it worth buying?" where a bunch of people are talking about the bad camera quality.
Sent from my LG-H830 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
front camera make picture like 60$ phone so did jump to S8 cause not worth vs S8 front camera
mila4me said:
front camera make picture like 60$ phone so did jump to S8 cause not worth vs S8 front camera
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reviews already show the S8 selfie camera is awful too. What's the point of auto focus if it still makes you look like a cartoon and "beautify's" everything. Side by side comparisons online with the Pixel and iphone 7 show the S8 (and samsung) is still awful for selfies.
The selfie camera is a little blurry but not that bad. For 5MP it's to be expected. Yes, it's not as versatile as the back camera setup, but I guess if you're not used to having to plan shots to get the composition you want, it can seem crap by today's standards. blurry in darker shots, but does well enough for me. Using the filters that are on by default make it worse too. (Can't guarantee that the image I attached doesn't have any filters added as I don't remember when I took the shot. I think it is slightly filtered)
I was concerned every shot with the back camera would need to be "tweaked", but I'm surprised how well it does with auto. You can modify gamma on the fly too which is nice (and necessary with more difficult shots). Keep in mind though if you're cropping to 16:9, then it will affect perceived image quality. That can affect the blurriness of the non-wide angle lens tbh since it's the lesser of the two. Both take great shots though on automatic.
The wide angle is the best one of all three.
I attached a photo taken with selfie lens. You can judge for yourself. Personally, I think it looks fine. Most shots are going to be viewed on mobile so resolution won't be as important as the back camera. I don't use selfie cam too often though, but if it's your primary camera, then yes you will be disappointed by the step down and will likely want to go for something with a higher res like S8...
This is comparison of night shots of two back lens... wide angle versus non-wide angel camera... as you can see, both have their advantages and disadvantages.
---------- Post added at 04:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:21 PM ----------
Here are a bunch of microshots. Does it have it's weaknesses? Oh yes. Is it a bad camera. Not at all.
Pro Tip: Sometimes I notice sometimes you have to "zoom in" just a tad in order to get the autofocus to catch stuff up close but it's rare. My point and shoot does the same thing. (Also there is manual focus)
No issues at all with the cameras here. FWIW, I like them a lot better than the G4.
Just because of this thread, I had to try in near total darkness... It turned out pretty clear. I'm not disappointed at all. I came from S7 Edge, and I can say for a quick low light picture, it is a "little" better, but by no means is this camera a disappointment. But, when there's light, it's better than S7. I'm very happy with the phone.
I am having horrible camera pictures. Worse then the last few phones i've had. The panorama has double images and it's wavy. The reviews on youtube says it works good. all the pictures look like the grass and trees was painted with water colors. it's awful. I'm worried about what I"m going to do now. I can't keep my GS7 since I upgraded so there's no turning back unless i exchange my phone but for what model? I don't want a Galaxy with a curved screen so the options are limited at Verizon. I would upload some images but how do i post the images from my computer? The image button wants a url.
railfan-eric said:
I am having horrible camera pictures. Worse then the last few phones i've had. The panorama has double images and it's wavy. The reviews on youtube says it works good. all the pictures look like the grass and trees was painted with water colors. it's awful. I'm worried about what I"m going to do now. I can't keep my GS7 since I upgraded so there's no turning back unless i exchange my phone but for what model? I don't want a Galaxy with a curved screen so the options are limited at Verizon. I would upload some images but how do i post the images from my computer? The image button wants a url.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post some of your shots? So we can compare?
Blars1206 said:
Just because of this thread, I had to try in near total darkness... It turned out pretty clear. I'm not disappointed at all. I came from S7 Edge, and I can say for a quick low light picture, it is a "little" better, but by no means is this camera a disappointment. But, when there's light, it's better than S7. I'm very happy with the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you using auto mode and what resolution do you have it at at?
Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
maruichan said:
Can you post some of your shots? So we can compare?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
At the bottom of my post I said I wanted to post some shots but I don't know how to upload them to the forum from the computer.
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 11:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:09 PM ----------
echto said:
Are you using auto mode and what resolution do you have it at at?
Sent from my LG-H872 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I tried auto mode with and without HDR. Btw there's no HDR button so I have to go in the settings every time I want to turn it on our off. Totally unacceptable. I tried manual mode too. I have it at 16:9 at the highest resolution. Is there a quality setting I missed?
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
echto said:
Are you using auto mode and what resolution do you have it at at?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have got a screen shot of my settings. It was done in auto. I used the mode/filter called "1839". Also, if you tap on the object you want it to focus on, you'll see a slider (I circled it in other screen shot) which your can use to make adjustments to make pictures clearer in low light or put your own tweak on a picture.
railfan-eric said:
At the bottom of my post I said I wanted to post some shots but I don't know how to upload them to the forum from the computer.
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 11:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 11:09 PM ----------
I tried auto mode with and without HDR. Btw there's no HDR button so I have to go in the settings every time I want to turn it on our off. Totally unacceptable. I tried manual mode too. I have it at 16:9 at the highest resolution. Is there a quality setting I missed?
Sent from my VS988 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is an attach button under post writing form. You need to be in advanced mode to attach. The button is "Manage Attachments"
maruichan said:
There is an attach button under post writing form. You need to be in advanced mode to attach. The button is "Manage Attachments"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. I knew i should have looked there. I'll take a look.
I don't see this thread here so I might as well start one. Use this thread to show of your photography skills on the Note 4, since people insist on camera2 API all the time and we are lucky to have it.
If you're uploading multiple photos please
them so it won't be a huge post or use the attachment function.
Do share your camera app and custom settings if you can too.
Files attached used HDR for daytime while the night sky pic used ISO 1600 and 0.6s shutter speed. All taken with Open Camera. Anyone got better settings to take pictures os stars or the moon at night?
Can you please confirm that exposure settings working or not in manual mode? And what is the maximum exposure time?
---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 PM ----------
AutumQueen92 said:
I don't see this thread here so I might as well start one. Use this thread to show of your photography skills on the Note 4, since people insist on camera2 API all the time and we are lucky to have it.
If you're uploading multiple photos please
them so it won't be a huge post or use the attachment function.
Do share your camera app and custom settings if you can too.
Files attached used HDR for daytime while the night sky pic used ISO 1600 and 0.6s shutter speed. All taken with Open Camera. Anyone got better settings to take pictures os stars or the moon at night?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Waiting for your reply.
ridershahmir said:
Can you please confirm that exposure settings working or not in manual mode? And what is the maximum exposure time?
---------- Post added at 10:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:42 PM ----------
Waiting for your reply.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They're all working, exposure time goes up to 0.7s
AutumQueen92 said:
They're all working, exposure time goes up to 0.7s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you do longer exposure and lower the ISO?
syl0n said:
Can you do longer exposure and lower the ISO?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For longer you need other camera apps, the resolution will be stuck at 2mp. You can change iso yes.
AutumQueen92 said:
For longer you need other camera apps, the resolution will be stuck at 2mp. You can change iso yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By how much can you increase the exposure time in third party apps such as manual camera app or other apps?
ridershahmir said:
By how much can you increase the exposure time in third party apps such as manual camera app or other apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
0.7s
Nature clicks with miui 8.5 and miui 9 camera
SD625
notauseranymore said:
For longer you need other camera apps, the resolution will be stuck at 2mp. You can change iso yes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Max resolution is at 2Mp because the long exposure is not real but through software. Many pics are taken and then combined.
Google Camera Pixel 2 Mod Arnova8G2 Version 8, all max settings.
Dear friends,
I have a question regarding the shutter speed of the OP5. It's max.shutter speed is set to 30 seconds. Is there any ROM (I've searched for it but didn't find one) or any other way to increase shutter speed (as example 60)? Night shots turn out beautiful with shutter speed set to 30 but i would like to set it even higher, to capture night pictures under worser circumstances.
ProShot (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.riseupgames.proshot2&hl=en)
It has an option for infinite exposure times. It can be found under 'light painting'
---------- Post added at 12:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 PM ----------
ProShot (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.riseupgames.proshot2&hl=en)
It has an option for infinite exposure times. It can be found under 'light painting'
nxss4 said:
ProShot (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.riseupgames.proshot2&hl=en)
It has an option for infinite exposure times. It can be found under 'light painting'
---------- Post added at 12:50 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:50 PM ----------
ProShot (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.riseupgames.proshot2&hl=en)
It has an option for infinite exposure times. It can be found under 'light painting'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Light Painting doesn't work. It was said by dev next week (in May), but it never worked. When you select it, it says: Coming Soon
jamorimpt said:
Light Painting doesn't work. It was said by dev next week (in May), but it never worked. When you select it, it says: Coming Soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange
How about Lenx?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fenchtose.lenx&hl=en
nxss4 said:
Strange
How about Lenx?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fenchtose.lenx&hl=en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
doesn't modify actual shutter exposure. just simulates high shutter exposure. not useful app
nxss4 said:
Strange
How about Lenx?
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.fenchtose.lenx&hl=en
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks but useless. 30secs Max, low quality and nothing that OP Camera doesn't have.
Best way to make very long exposures is to take several 30 secs photos and stacking them with Photoshop or stacking app.