I am a bit confused about my model number.
In settings I am shown as Z017DB.
Is that the same as ZE520KL?
Sorry about the terribly newbie questions, I have never handled an Asus before.
Bump?
Ze520kl indeed
Related
Currently, there is confusion between the different ASUS MEmo Pads (Good job with the naming ASUS!), do you think we could split the conversations between the ME572C and the others? I am afraid that advice and comments are being mixed and could lead to bricked devices and other results (Like me getting hopeful for a ROM for the ME572C, when it is still bootloader locked :crying: , only to find out it is not for us)
Etterbeek said:
Currently, there is confusion between the different ASUS MEmo Pads (Good job with the naming ASUS!), do you think we could split the conversations between the ME572C and the others? I am afraid that advice and comments are being mixed and could lead to bricked devices and other results (Like me getting hopeful for a ROM for the ME572C, when it is still bootloader locked :crying: , only to find out it is not for us)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think splitting them into separate forums would help. It is confusing that several different tablets are lumped into the MeMO Pad section here. I think we need a ME572 and a ME176 sub forum. Is it possible that all of the ME17X's could be grouped together? At the very least I would add to the forums rules that posts must identify the Model Number in the title...
Agreed.
Etterbeek said:
Currently, there is confusion between the different ASUS MEmo Pads (Good job with the naming ASUS!), do you think we could split the conversations between the ME572C and the others? I am afraid that advice and comments are being mixed and could lead to bricked devices and other results (Like me getting hopeful for a ROM for the ME572C, when it is still bootloader locked :crying: , only to find out it is not for us)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
muiriddin said:
I think splitting them into separate forums would help. It is confusing that several different tablets are lumped into the MeMO Pad section here. I think we need a ME572 and a ME176 sub forum. Is it possible that all of the ME17X's could be grouped together? At the very least I would add to the forums rules that posts must identify the Model Number in the title...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
mikemikemikexxx said:
Agreed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usually we'll do a split when there is an active development section to avoid people flashing the wrong software to the wrong device. We don't have that problem here since the development sections are pretty quiet. However, if you guys think it prudent, we could add two more General sections for ME572 and ME176. I just worry that doing so will add unnecessary clutter (currently people are doing a good job tagging their threads with the tablet model within the title). Thoughts?
My concern is with Asus's asinine naming convention that people will get them mixed up (which they do thinking about it buying accessories). While there isn't much custom ROM flashing going on (yet), there is a lot of stock ROM flashing that happens so that Root can be (re)obtained. I will defer to what you think is best. I was thinking until Asus gets smart and starts numbering them, list them by year?
I think there are more than three 7" Memopad models but at least it could be cleaned up via year.
As far as I can remember there is :
Asus MeMO Pad HD 7 - 2013
Asus MeMO Pad 7 (176C)+(CX) - 2014
Asus MeMO Pad 7 (ME572C) + (CL) -2015
Okay, I understand the reasoning you are putting forth here. It does amaze me however that this device (ME572) is flying so far under the radar. It has a great price/performance ratio that I think is basically unmatched at this point.
Preventing the flashing of the wrong files onto one of these devices would be a good thing. I do wish that Asus would revisit the locked/unlocked decision however the accounting department must believe that returns would go up if they opened up the device...
I can live without a split as long as we all try to clearly tag the model in our thread titles...
svetius said:
Usually we'll do a split when there is an active development section to avoid people flashing the wrong software to the wrong device. We don't have that problem here since the development sections are pretty quiet. However, if you guys think it prudent, we could add two more General sections for ME572 and ME176. I just worry that doing so will add unnecessary clutter (currently people are doing a good job tagging their threads with the tablet model within the title). Thoughts?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Trying to get some info because the lolipop update is bugged.
For me it was very confusing till I discovered there was an earlier version with the same name.
Hi All,
Apologies in advance for asking a question that many have tackled. However, I am getting mixed answers when looking this up. I am looking to buy a D800 (ATT) for use on Tmobile. Will I have issues with any voice/data services? Some say it works perfect, others complain about LTE issues. If someone could either point me to the answer or respond in this thread, I would really appreciate it. Thanks!
Hello,
My title is a bit misleading since I have already successfully had phone calls on a G900T on the Free network. However, it's very unreliable and most of the times my calls don't go through: I just get a hangup after 1 minute, and didn't even get a dialtone.
Is there anything I can do to make it better? I'm not on stock ROM anymore but on crDroid 4.6.1 (latest version available in the "Unified Development" section). I have enabled all bandwidths in the settings ("Preferred network type" is LTE/DSCDMA/CDMA/EvDo/GSM/WCDMA). I have this for baseband: G900TUVU1GQC2) and kernel is Linux 3.4.113-lineageos-g0ed263d.
Thanks for any help/info!
fdelente said:
Hello, My title is a bit misleading since I have already successfully had phone calls on a G900T on the Free network.........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a tough question since the device is, in general, compatible with the French Network Provider but, it looks like the device is lacking on a very small band of frequencies for the Free Network.
Though it's always "encouraged" for the use of the SM-G900F (International Variant) since it has a much broader frequency range across the board.
I did locate the following link that reflects the same/similar question as yours. It may be a few years old but, the information, in general, should still be relevant today.
https://forums.androidcentral.com/s...-galaxy-s5-model-should-i-purchase-where.html
This is the best I can help you with but, I do hope that it is helpful and maybe someone here can provide you with something a bit more helpful.
You can always try to obtain some member guidance within the following Q&A thread that's specific to your device and variants.
https://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2700073
Good Luck & Have a Safe Trip!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
UNLESS asked to do so, PLEASE don't PM me regarding support. Sent using The ClaRetoX Forum App on my Commodore VIC-20.
Thanks for your answer Ibuprophen, I'll look into the links you gave and hope to find more info from there!
Cheers!
Hello guys.
I have this model PF7146BS. I bought the car with it. My mirrorlink does not work so the xtrons's support sent me some update kit and now, the screen is very messy, almost to the point that it doesn't work.
I have a question regarding the custom roms. The hardware on this one is pretty good, but software wise is poor, interface as well.
Are there any that could work with mine? Any help will be extremely helpful.
My version : PF7146BS Xtrons
Can't post link due to the fact that I have no posts..
htt p://aus.xtrons.co m/pf7146bs.html
Many thanks,
Ciprian
Bump
xyauto yt3580 app problem. Some applications cannot be turned on. Maps are blinking or the system is not responding. then a reset follows. Android update did not resolve the issue. I'm attaching a video. where could be the problem ?
Your browser is not able to display this video.
No one knows where the problem may be
Buddy, no-one seems to know much of anything here. I thought folks here were supposed to be experts but it seems not. No-one has given my questions any useful answers either, just one guy who has a down on the units I have which is totally unhelpful. I wonder why I bothered joining.
@Alfik223
No one can answer on such questions without getting more system information.
Don´t expect that someone searches for the unit you mentioned in your posting. Needed information should be given always if you need support.
Firmware?
MCU?
Memory integrated? 1/16GB unklikely?
@Mr.TT_NZ Sorry, why are you writing such bs? What do you expect to get? Buying a cheapo unit and wondering that this **** does not work as expected... If no one has an answer to your special questions means, that your questions are incomplete, not understandable, or you are using some hardware/software which no one else uses. You really should think before posting such statements, because you want to get help, most guys who are more or less experts won´t answer after your mimimi...