Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the LG V30 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
hello,
Here are my views after using the V30+'s camera for 3 days.
Low Light: Use Manual Mode FFS. Pictures come out way better in manual mode in low light.(I am a noob in using the manual mode and the pictures cane out great once I got a hang of it)
Wide angle camera: Used it way more than expected and the shots are EPIC!!
Primary camera: Used it when trying to get the subject as the main focus while taking shots.
Attaching a low light shot and few wide angle shots.
These are not touched yet and all are in JPEG format.
https://imgur.com/Wpjg7o6
https://imgur.com/bmO7enS
https://imgur.com/tSqrtkQ
https://imgur.com/9cwMW2d
https://imgur.com/gYNAIlx
Related
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Realme 3 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Realme 3 Pro come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Realme has a really good camera but edge detection , exposure and the EIS needs improvement badly ....
I'd say Realme's camera is satisfactory enough for outdoor landscape scenes and food, but when I tried to snap an A4 brochure from around 50cm distance & around 45-55degrees from the paper's face, the text in the resulting photo is smudged and hard to read. That's literally my first photo after unboxing, and it's daytime indoor with very good ceiling & window lights. I haven't tried the same situation after receiving 2 software updates.
Another situation is some product photo session. Daytime indoor with bright enough ceiling light only (no professional lighting setup) and flash turned off. The results are good enough, but too much over-processing. I had to decrease the contrast and saturation half the slider to get the correct color. Also, for some reason white reflective objects (like beads) got really soft edges. Other colors in the same photo have sharp edges.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
The 24MP camera puts out some decent photos but does not have an option to shoot RAW. Would have been nice to see that option. You also have a wide shot mode with uses an 8MP camera and produces pretty terrible quality images.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Vivo Nex 3 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Hi got it for 4 days now.
The camera performance in good light is very good, with nice details and color.
The auto mode make a good job. But the portrait mode just not working. You can see the portrait mode active but there's not bokeh, same happening with front camera.
Some one with the same behaviour? Im in the 1.11.15
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the RealMe X3 SuperZoom come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Day light picture quality is good...low light it is really crap.
Nah it ain´t that bad. As Vedu1505 wrote in daylight and good lighting condition the picture quality is really great. The photo app tend to overexpose a little bit and the final pictures are slightly oversharpened. In low light the result are, well...mediocre. The wide angle sensor is good, though it has some focus issues here and there. Macro lens is well...crap.
But you can help it with GCam mod. It works with the main sensor only (no superzoom, no wide angle or macro), but it has good exposition, nice balanced colors, no oversharpening. HDR modes and Night Sight works as well, so the night shots are not that hopeless.
Overall it´s mid-range camera, don´t expect the flagship level quality. Despite being called SuperZoom this is no photo-centric phone.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the ASUS ROG Phone 3 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Very few tries recently. With good light conditions, pics are great. Autofocus is fast, images look more natural than the ROG 1 version.
On night captures, you need to get used to the night mode, since it takes the picture and then asks for 4 seconds to stay still and process the picture. The results are not very good though, lots of noise.
Need to play more with the pro mode and see if pictures can be tweaked or enhanced.