Database Users

what happens with Quadrant?

I move all the Quadrant's data to dbdata and then re-run the test
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My SGS completed the IO test and the others one with insane speed and scored only 933 ???
In comparison to the droidx's quadrant test in youtube, after this modification, my I9000 outperforms droidx in every single test. But it still gets lower score than droidx (1131)
Can you guys explain me what happens?
Is it because the SGS's frame rate is intentionally limited at 56 fps?

I think quadrant has lost its merit with this one and it also sucks because it doesnt break down the scores to tell you which department of the phone is better. I don't think we should invest our worries with quadrant.

[INFO] 3.01 VS 3.1 Benchmarks

3.01 - Full Data Wipe Before Benchmarks
Quadrant Advanced (Whole System)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Linpack (Flops)
Sunspider (Javascript Performance)
3.1 - Full Data Wipe Before Benchmarks
Quadrant Advanced (Whole System)
Linpack (Flops)
Sunspider (Javascript Performance)
I always run these before all my updates because i'm curious about benchmarks, so i decided to post them plus i was surprised by them

well there's proof in numbers and screenshots that benchmarks mean jack squat... 3.1 is faster in real world use, hands down.

i agree. 3.1 is much faster.

"There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and benchmarks."
and that its supposed to be a joke, ... its fun because its true

Modified SGH-i747 Benchmarks

My setup when I ran these:
Device: SGH-i747
OS: Android 4.0.4
Build: Diet ICS 7.4.2 (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1732195)
Kernel: KT747 (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1756776)
SetCPU: Max CPU, performance, noop (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mhuang.overclocking&hl=en)
Quadrant: 5025
http://i.imgur.com/zj003.png
AnTuTu: 6760
http://i.imgur.com/7EIUA.png
:good:

This is my Quadrant results. Stock (rooted) Telus I747.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

I forgot to say... please post your own and tell us your setup :highfive:

w98seeng said:
This is my Quadrant results. Stock (rooted) Telus I747.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can't imagine scoring that high stock... i was scoring in the low-mid 4000's on quadrant with stock/root

Sunspider results / javascript performance

Does anyone know why my nexus 10 benchmarks significantly better than my s4? The tablet is not as powerful and obviously scores a lot lower in antutu / quadrant but Web performance is miles ahead. Any one got any ideas? Just curious. The s4 is no slouch by any means but I can't understand the massive performance difference? S4 running cm 10.2 with kt kernel, nexus running aokp with trinity kernel, both over clocked slightly.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

G900F works only 2 cpu and 22.000 score only

my friend has bought g900F but he complained that the phone is so slow..on antutu has 22000 score and as i have seen on his cpuz 2 cpu has been stoped (?)
he has made factory reset etc..
any solution?
plz help me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

CPU cores will 'STOP' when the device is idle to save power
That is normal
The benchmark score is very low though

@*Detection* but he hasnt enabled power saving..
btw he made a full wipe and factory rest through recovery and now he scores about 41000
but still complaining his phone works slow :/