[INFO] 3.01 VS 3.1 Benchmarks - Eee Pad Transformer General

3.01 - Full Data Wipe Before Benchmarks
Quadrant Advanced (Whole System)
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Linpack (Flops)
Sunspider (Javascript Performance)
3.1 - Full Data Wipe Before Benchmarks
Quadrant Advanced (Whole System)
Linpack (Flops)
Sunspider (Javascript Performance)
I always run these before all my updates because i'm curious about benchmarks, so i decided to post them plus i was surprised by them

well there's proof in numbers and screenshots that benchmarks mean jack squat... 3.1 is faster in real world use, hands down.

i agree. 3.1 is much faster.

"There are three kinds of lies: Lies, damned lies, and benchmarks."
and that its supposed to be a joke, ... its fun because its true

Related

what happens with Quadrant?

I move all the Quadrant's data to dbdata and then re-run the test
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
My SGS completed the IO test and the others one with insane speed and scored only 933 ???
In comparison to the droidx's quadrant test in youtube, after this modification, my I9000 outperforms droidx in every single test. But it still gets lower score than droidx (1131)
Can you guys explain me what happens?
Is it because the SGS's frame rate is intentionally limited at 56 fps?
I think quadrant has lost its merit with this one and it also sucks because it doesnt break down the scores to tell you which department of the phone is better. I don't think we should invest our worries with quadrant.

Sunspider results / javascript performance

Does anyone know why my nexus 10 benchmarks significantly better than my s4? The tablet is not as powerful and obviously scores a lot lower in antutu / quadrant but Web performance is miles ahead. Any one got any ideas? Just curious. The s4 is no slouch by any means but I can't understand the massive performance difference? S4 running cm 10.2 with kt kernel, nexus running aokp with trinity kernel, both over clocked slightly.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

G900F works only 2 cpu and 22.000 score only

my friend has bought g900F but he complained that the phone is so slow..on antutu has 22000 score and as i have seen on his cpuz 2 cpu has been stoped (?)
he has made factory reset etc..
any solution?
plz help me
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
CPU cores will 'STOP' when the device is idle to save power
That is normal
The benchmark score is very low though
@*Detection* but he hasnt enabled power saving..
btw he made a full wipe and factory rest through recovery and now he scores about 41000
but still complaining his phone works slow :/

Android Nougat Benchmarks for Honor 8

Android Nougat Benchmarks for Honor 8​
I thought I'd post some of the results of benchmark tests run on the beta version of Android Nougat on the Honor 8. I ran a few tests and here are the results.
AnTuTu Benchmark
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
GeekBench 4
3DMark
I have put you on my leaderboard for antutu.
At the moment you are the only person aside from me on it
http://forum.xda-developers.com/honor-8/help/closest-youve-to-100k-antutu-t3507639
Some benchmarks of stock from reviews around the net:
Antutu: 89824
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/honor-8_id10168/benchmarks
Antutu: 94335
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMwR_NU6nJM
Geekbench 4: 1728/4820
http://www.trustedreviews.com/honor-8-review-performance-software-page-2
Geekbench 4: 1744/5118
http://www.notebookreview.com/phonereview/huawei-honor-8-review/
3DMark: 964
http://www.notebookreview.com/phonereview/huawei-honor-8-review/
3DMark: 864
http://www.trustedreviews.com/honor-8-review-performance-software-page-2
Slightly higher! The rest of mine are all almost those numbers.

Very low score (1003) on geekbench after upgrading to 8.0

I'm getting very low score on geekbench (1003) used to get around 1800 on 7.0, Is everybody getting the same score as me?
I've t-mobile variant.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
akashx101 said:
i'm getting very low score on geekbench (1003) used to get around 1800 on 7.0, is everybody getting the same score as me?
I've t-mobile variant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you factory reset?
Mine
Just now, I got 1035 for single core and 2525 for multicore. Not sure why this is, but I'll attempt a facory reset some time soon.
Tried again without music playing in the background. The results aren't that much better.
Clear your cache using Google Files GO or Smart Cleaner (LG Bloat, actually quite useful) to improve performance. No need for a factory reset. As you can see, it's dramatically improved the benchmarks for single core.

Categories

Resources