Hello XDA,
as you know we got bootloader unlocked and that means we can finnaly flash system files without worries about bricking the phone.
I'm a not an expert nor a developer, but building CM from source looks easy (not really needs much skill), shown in this videos I found on youtube /watch?v=qW6Lz5vogqc (part 1), /watch?v=qsZU3DuBPw4 (part 2), /watch?v=YfFefW5rK1w (part 3).
I want to do this becouse developers aren't intrested in doing this for z00e. So using this I could build the Unofficial rom, but before I start doing this I ask for some info and advices, also I'll need a device maintainer...
So my phone arrives in a day, exactly 24. june.
But don't expect the zip file soon since I have a low-end laptop, so that's going to slow the process a bit..
Can you give me some advice?
Well, good luck! I do believe that someone should start this...
Get ready for chunk gigs disk size, and because you mentioned about low spec, get ready for long time build!
Oh, if you want, there's tutorial using Google Cloud platform on xda, pretty much you can forget about size, time and spec, but in 3 months trial
Again, good luck! :good:
Sent from my ASUS_Z00RD using XDA Labs
Thank you, I'll try to get some more info till my phone arrives. I also found some guy with a "cm 13.0" branch associated with z00e on github, I'll post that github link tommorow and try to make a contact with him.
If you want, we can work together to build CM, i've a PC with Ubuntu (AMD Dual-Core 3.2 Ghz, 500 GB of storage)
Nice, I'll contact you in a couple of days, but I might try Google Cloud service for a faster compile, we'll see..
I want to be a dev too....
Few month ago i try to build cm12 for zen 4 too....
And the problem.... I can't find device-tree and how to add it on cm12.
Too hard
---------- Post added at 06:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:28 AM ----------
Bro.... Can u bring me some document how to build rom cm12.1 ?!?
I find and have more thread take it.....! But every thread have every way T.T and it not same
I found this tutorials forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-how-to-build-rom-google-cloud-t3360430 on xda for faster work, and this one for building the rom itself forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-android-rom-development-t2814763/post54118614#post54118614 and it's keeping up a detail, so you cant miss anything, and about the device tree you have a newbie version here and it has device tree info simplified forums.androidcentral.com/general-help-how/287910-guide-dev-compile-any-source-built-rom-your-device-ultra-noob-friendly.html
Okay, got my phone today, unlocked bootloader, rooted and played around him a bit, mostly watching and modifying applications with lucky patcher, installed xposed, etc...
Before that I did some search and found gits for vendor, device tree and kernel needed to compile unofficial CM 13, yes 13!
I will start the actual work in 2/3 hours.
To all ze500kl users: There is hope!
Sent from my ASUS_Z00ED using XDA Labs
Started...
Sent from my ASUS_Z00ED using XDA Labs
Great!! Good luck! Gonna wait for it!
Will you add the kernel for Marshmallow available on the Asus Website into the CM13 ?
Yes, that kernel source I'm gonna be using..
Sent from my ASUS_Z00ED using XDA Labs
jocamucko said:
I found this tutorials forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-how-to-build-rom-google-cloud-t3360430 on xda for faster work, and this one for building the rom itself forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-android-rom-development-t2814763/post54118614#post54118614 and it's keeping up a detail, so you cant miss anything, and about the device tree you have a newbie version here and it has device tree info simplified forums.androidcentral.com/general-help-how/287910-guide-dev-compile-any-source-built-rom-your-device-ultra-noob-friendly.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank bro.... Maybe i will try built for myself <3 a RR rom or some different ??.....
Ah..... After build rom,Must i do continue built a kernel from source bro ?
ValKyre said:
Thank bro.... Maybe i will try built for myself <3 a RR rom or some different ??.....
Ah..... After build rom,Must i do continue built a kernel from source bro ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, no need, you got your kernel involved in the making of the rom, you'll see, you'll need kernel source, device three and vendor. You can find that on github... Go step by step on this, and you'll get the point.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00ED using XDA Labs
jocamucko said:
No, no need, you got your kernel involved in the making of the rom, you'll see, you'll need kernel source, device three and vendor. You can find that on github... Go step by step on this, and you'll get the point.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00ED using XDA Labs
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bro.. so.... how i can add source kernel with terminal commands?
can u show me the command ?!?
and vendor,device-tree i dont see it on github...
---------- Post added at 05:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:59 AM ----------
Sir.....
Can i use it kernel and vendor ?!?
ValKyre said:
bro.. so.... how i can add source kernel with terminal commands?
can u show me the command ?!?
and vendor,device-tree i dont see it on github...
---------- Post added at 05:39 AM ---------- Previous post was at 04:59 AM ----------
Sir.....
Can i use it kernel and vendor ?!?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you are going to add them to the terminal after getting sources, but you have to make a local_manifest.xml file and place link to their repo on github.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00ED using XDA Labs
There...
Sent from my ASUS_Z00ED using XDA Labs
Thank bro
Hello, some news about CM13 ? have you pass to build the rom ?
Yes and no, mostly 'cuz of internet connection stability and computer performance.. :/ All bad.. Will contact someone to build it for me..
Sent from my Tab3 Lite 7.0 using XDA Labs
Related
As of tomorrow the guys over at Canonical are unveiling their Ubuntu Touch porting guide ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting ). This would be a prime opportunity to do a bit of homework prior to this so we are primed and ready to begin porting what promises to be a worth while user experience
I propose we pool our resources, discussing what we know about how Ubuntu Phone (Touch) works and suggestions as to how we are going to shoe-horn it on top of our already existing code bade of Kernel and Userland stuff.
Just a notion, ignore if you wish but i feel this would be a worthy endeavour.
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-touch-preview/quantal/mwc-demo/ (Link to the image for the nexus)
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
It's released now!
Well time to seek for developers having time to port this
blizzari said:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Porting
It's released now!
Well time to seek for developers having time to port this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks blizzari So what we are looking at is the Cyanogenmod 10.1 code-base minus Dalvik and the Java API. Firstly, good call Canonical, secondly what does this mean for getting things up and running on our device?
Im going to fire up my Ubuntu rig and start dicking about with the porting process to see if i cant add any relevant information here
sabianadmin said:
Thanks blizzari So what we are looking at is the Cyanogenmod 10.1 code-base minus Dalvik and the Java API. Firstly, good call Canonical, secondly what does this mean for getting things up and running on our device?
Im going to fire up my Ubuntu rig and start dicking about with the porting process to see if i cant add any relevant information here
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting Ubuntu Touch is as Simple as Building CM
I'm really excited for this. Been trying to learn to dev for a while. Gonna step it up a gear.
Sent from my GT-i9100 using xda premium
Any more progress on the same? I would love to dual boot Ubuntu along with my SuperNexus. Here's a list of WIP devices and SGS2 (I9100) is not even listed there
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Touch/Devices#Work_in_progress
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2165568
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 07:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:02 AM ----------
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2079080
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
---------- Post added at 07:04 AM ---------- Previous post was at 07:03 AM ----------
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2156434
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
I really want to try it
This new Android distribution treats development differently than any other.
CLICK HERE FOR THE ROM, THREAD, CHANGELOG, AND DISCUSSION.
A post detailing our team and new developers from TeamEOS can be found in the OP linked.
ntroducing codefireXperiment for your device! This OP is going to stay slim and bloat free, just like codefireXperiment. No marketing buzzwords either. We take such confidence in the speed and performance of this distribution, we challenge you to find a faster and more stable one!
Here's a bit of info you may want on this project for how we do things differently:
No features you don't need which slow the device down, or put your data at risk of being stolen. If you want to give it away, it should be your decision.
A fast and clean install with no UX decisions made for you. You make the ROM whatever you would like.
A team constantly exploring totally new feature sets and optimizations geared toward you, the user
We utilize a plethora of optimizations in a build system unlike any other:
Each build has a toolchain built for your device at the time of build. No more generic toolchain android builds.
Consistently updated upstream toolchain module source with our custom backports, fixes, and optimizations applied in a patch at build time.
Fully built utilizing Link Time Optimization (another custom ROM first). Feel free to google this one a bit to get an idea of the performance gain.
Many repositories have code fixes, cleanups, and many minor optimizations which are too generous to even speak of here.
Optimizations are toggled on and off based on device for the best experience we can acheive for your device without sacrificing any stability
Many Qcom optimizations and AOSP master (upstream) optimizations and fixes using device specifications to determine usage.
Fully built utilizing strict aliasing and isognu++11 mode.
Full "-O3" build. To those who don't know, this is the highest "optimization level" available in gcc that sets many other flags.
Enjoy, and thank you for choosing codefireXperiment
XDA:DevDB Information
[ROM] [AOSP] [4.2.2] [cfX-Toolchain 4.8.y+] codefireXperiment, ROM for the Oppo Find 5
Contributors
anders3408
ROM OS Version: 4.2.x Jelly Bean
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: No Longer Updated
Current Stable Version: JDQ39E-20130
Stable Release Date: 2013-08-11
Created 2013-09-04
Last Updated 2014-08-18
Nice team you assembled there, looking forward to trying it out. openpdroid patches failed for me, oh well, gotta get more experience with xprivacy anyway.
BTW, didn't see it on your site so far, featurelist somewhere(espacially in terms of the kernel in use)?
any screenshot
S.D.Richards said:
BTW, didn't see it on your site so far, featurelist somewhere(espacially in terms of the kernel in use)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look at the Github link to the kernel source
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
maxwen said:
look at the Github link to the kernel source
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/codefireXperimen.../arch/arm/configs/cyanogenmod_find5_defconfig
Hard looking through that looking for pieces if you don't know the specific CONFIG_xxx name.
Anyway, in a quick scroll through, I fell over some enabled (=y) USB OTG stuff - I was under the impression the device doesn't support it?
Nightly is blazing fast. Quickest boot times ever. Even the first boot was super fast.
Sent from my Find 5 using xda app-developers app
Sorry to ask, I probably missed it somewhere... is this AOSP based, or other? Max's kernel is going on this bad boy if I try it... unless... it's already in there
no idea what this is, but i will flash it and take a look
Pure aosp based. For now not as many features as the other codefirex, but things are being added. Kernel is cm based with a few changes from maxwen and faux123, thanks both. Credits thread will come up.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
charlatan01 said:
Sorry to ask, I probably missed it somewhere... is this AOSP based, or other? Max's kernel is going on this bad boy if I try it... unless... it's already in there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not tested maxwen kernel on it but you should be ready to reflash then, not totally sure it will work. Early tests did bootloop on maxwen kernels.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
anders3408 said:
Not tested maxwen kernel on it but you should be ready to reflash then, not totally sure it will work. Early tests did bootloop on maxwen kernels.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks... I will hold off on flashing his kernel for the time being. It would be nice to get that working if possible.
charlatan01 said:
Thanks... I will hold off on flashing his kernel for the time being. It would be nice to get that working if possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tested, you should be able to boot maxwen kernel on cfxe, at least it does with cfxe ramdisk
test it out and tell how it wents
I do have some random reboots after +-10 minutes with this ROM. Can I provide you a logcat Anders?
anders3408 said:
Just tested, you should be able to boot maxwen kernel on cfxe, at least it does with cfxe ramdisk
test it out and tell how it wents
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
need to take a look at your ramdisk
if something special is required I can provide prebuilts with your ramdisk
Sent from my Find 5 using xda app-developers app
mavaee said:
I do have some random reboots after +-10 minutes with this ROM. Can I provide you a logcat Anders?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you on the default kernel in this rom , and did a full wipe ?
Sure you can make a logcat , paste it via here
you can also submit a bug : here but please add log also
have not had a single random reboot at all, so its a bit wierd
anders3408 said:
are you on the default kernel in this rom , and did a full wipe ?
Sure you can make a logcat , paste it via here
you can also submit a bug : here but please add log also
have not had a single random reboot at all, so its a bit wierd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I used the default kernel and coming from CM10.1 with a full wipe. I have to say I didn't experienced a reboot after all this afternoon so maybe it was just the ROM settling down.
---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ----------
Logcat:
http://logcat.scheffsblend.com/view?id=285002
mavaee said:
Yes I used the default kernel and coming from CM10.1 with a full wipe. I have to say I didn't experienced a reboot after all this afternoon so maybe it was just the ROM settling down.
---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ----------
Logcat:
http://logcat.scheffsblend.com/view?id=285002
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What happens when you made that logcat? I'm not seeing any reboots? Hopefully you won't see such reboot again.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
Nice ROM.
Voice to text isn't functioning... I was going to try the app install from the Slim ROM site, but I know that doesn't work with the CM kernel. I know it works with Max's.
Anyway, other than that it's been stable for me. Wifi tethering worked, Battery seemed good for only running it 24 hrs or so.
charlatan01 said:
Nice ROM.
Voice to text isn't functioning... I was going to try the app install from the Slim ROM site, but I know that doesn't work with the CM kernel. I know it works with Max's.
Anyway, other than that it's been stable for me. Wifi tethering worked, Battery seemed good for only running it 24 hrs or so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its also using the CM's kernel. Can you send me a link to that app and I'll have a look.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
^ sure thing. Src install is found (thanks to the folks at Slim!) here
I'm finally building cm12 for XT1022. The device tree is ready and the sources are up on my Azure 8-core VM. I'm in talks with Percy_g2 regarding the tree, waiting for his reply. I'd need the proprietary blobs, if someone can, please upload them. The script can be found on https://github.com/percy-g2/android_device_motorola_condor
as extract_files.sh
-----------------------
Click thanks on the bottom part of post if I helped.
---------------------------
Sent from my XT1022 using the XDA Premium 4 app.
Keep going buddy
Could anyone upload the proprietary blobs?
-----------------------
Click thanks on the bottom part of post if I helped.
---------------------------
Sent from my XT1022 using the XDA Premium 4 app.
tech_master said:
I'm finally building cm12 for XT1022. The device tree is ready and the sources are up on my Azure 8-core VM. I'm in talks with Percy_g2 regarding the tree, waiting for his reply. I'd need the proprietary blobs, if someone can, please upload them. The script can be found on https://github.com/percy-g2/android_device_motorola_condor
as extract_files.sh
-----------------------
Click thanks on the bottom part of post if I helped.
---------------------------
Sent from my XT1022 using the XDA Premium 4 app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You have build another tree for cm12. And u want to mearge that with pearcy's one
tech_master said:
I'm finally building cm12 for XT1022. The device tree is ready and the sources are up on my Azure 8-core VM. I'm in talks with Percy_g2 regarding the tree, waiting for his reply. I'd need the proprietary blobs, if someone can, please upload them. The script can be found on https://github.com/percy-g2/android_device_motorola_condor
as extract_files.sh
-----------------------
Click thanks on the bottom part of post if I helped.
---------------------------
Sent from my XT1022 using the XDA Premium 4 app.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't even try building with this tree. Nothing against the tree, but you'll run into a ton of errors. And after fixing all errors, the build won't even boot up. A lot of devs already tried to build it, but all of them failed to get it booting(Although they tried all different kangs to get it booting). You can try, but I'm just saying that you'll waste your time on this. I prefer you waiting for the lollipop kernel source to be released by Motorola after the lollipop release. Then it shouldn't be a waste. :angel:
So? Any news about the development?
They are working on it
I feel stupid posting this. I made a constant effort for 17 days. About 23 builds. Like 5 succeeded, none boots. Sorry for the rash promise, but we gotta wait till the kernel sources are out. Till then, if anyone needs a decent build server, PM me.
tech_master said:
I feel stupid posting this. I made a constant effort for 17 days. About 23 builds. Like 5 succeeded, none boots. Sorry for the rash promise, but we gotta wait till the kernel sources are out. Till then, if anyone needs a decent build server, PM me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think buzz needs it.
HELLO
TRY NEW BUILD USING THIS KERNEL SOURCE
https://github.com/cybojenix/kernel_motorola_condor/tree/recovery
USErecovery branch
Soak tests have begun. Check this out. Credits to me.
tech_master said:
I feel stupid posting this. I made a constant effort for 17 days. About 23 builds. Like 5 succeeded, none boots. Sorry for the rash promise, but we gotta wait till the kernel sources are out. .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem... Just remember next time to under promise and over deliver next time.... It's ready when it is...
Check it out guys! Maybe it will be good this time round!
http://opensource.lge.com/osSch/list?types=ALL&search=D855
[emoji47] [emoji47]
Enviado de meu LG-D855 usando Tapatalk
Good new , cant wait for flashing it
Christmas present in early lol
---------- Post added at 10:24 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 AM ----------
Lol it's based on Android 6.0.0_r1, very first release of Marshmallow. Hope they've added additional tweaks to make it less laggy.
Looks like LG ACTUALLY released it according to schedule (16-18 Dec). Wow!
A
Sent from my LG-D855 using XDA Forums
Let's get this party started !
that's only source code, where' the ROM lg?
---------- Post added at 11:00 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:39 AM ----------
basic086 said:
Let's get this party started !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So the compiled MARSHMALLOW is yummy?? ??
how to i can compile my own kdz?
brygom said:
how to i can compile my own kdz?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dunno about kdz but i just finished compiling into images.
Seems the kernel doesnt actually compile yet, small bug, will look into that later
JoinTheRealms said:
I dunno about kdz but i just finished compiling into images.
Seems the kernel doesnt actually compile yet, small bug, will look into that later
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah got drivers and zimage error on kernel compile too
Question
Hey guys... I want to ask if this 30a marshmallow zip file flashable? Or do we have to wait for the .kdz file?
malicovjek said:
Hey guys... I want to ask if this 30a marshmallow zip file flashable? Or do we have to wait for the .kdz file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wait
malicovjek said:
Hey guys... I want to ask if this 30a marshmallow zip file flashable? Or do we have to wait for the .kdz file?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not flashable zip file. It is a source file for building ROM and kernel. Some people already trying to build ROM from it.
what does this mean for aosp and cyanogemod. will they be able to use the source code provided by lg to sort out hardware issues faster ?
Maybe a noobish question. Is there mentioned version number in source code (6.0 or 6.0.1)? I curious as I have Mi band and it have pairing issues whit 6.0 version. 6.0.1 seems to fix them.
netmaniack said:
Maybe a noobish question. Is there mentioned version number in source code (6.0 or 6.0.1)? I curious as I have Mi band and it have pairing issues whit 6.0 version. 6.0.1 seems to fix them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its 6.0.0 r1
Got the kernel to build, simple fix
in drivers/video/msm/mdss/mdss_mdp_trace.h
find
Code:
#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH .
and replace it with a full path to mdss_mdp_trace
e.g
Code:
#define TRACE_INCLUDE_PATH /home/jtrealms/android/kernel/drivers/video/msm/mdss
packaging it now for some testing
ohhhhhhhhhh what a morning I can't wait to flash soon!! I remember last year Lollipop came around this time too! seems like LG likes to release new roms just before Christmas
Can't wait to flash it! @JoinTheRealms
Any heroes here wanna make costum kernel for tab 7 t280? or help me make one? To unlock and add governors and maybe oc
klemen241 said:
Any heroes here wanna make costum kernel for tab 7 t280? or help me make one? To unlock and add governors and maybe oc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, mate, couldn't find any. Try checking Github for any Source Codes and maybe ask @ashyx to help make it.
---------- Post added at 10:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------
klemen241 said:
Any heroes here wanna make costum kernel for tab 7 t280? or help me make one? To unlock and add governors and maybe oc
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not sure if this will help you, I found a forum of the SE-Policy patch for SM-T280 kernels
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-a/how-to/guide-root-tab-a6-t280-t3473541
ParadoXGodzillA said:
Sorry, mate, couldn't find any. Try checking Github for any Source Codes and maybe ask @ashyx to help make it.
---------- Post added at 10:11 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:07 PM ----------
I'm not sure if this will help you, I found a forum of the SE-Policy patch for SM-T280 kernels
Link: http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-tab-a/how-to/guide-root-tab-a6-t280-t3473541
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dude made it for t285 but he says its totaly different for t280
I have already compiled a permissive kernel for the T280 and am using it for my TWRP builds but it seems SElinux is still giving issues, so it wont boot the OS.
As usual Samsungs source code is broken and is going to take some time to fix.
ashyx said:
I have already compiled a permissive kernel for the T280 and am using it for my TWRP builds but it seems SElinux is still giving issues, so it wont boot the OS.
As usual Samsungs source code is broken and is going to take some time to fix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is great news, if i can help in any way please tell me. Only thing missing on this tablet is costum unlocked kernel and aosp or cm
Needing a custom kernel as well. Apps2sd doesn't like the vendors dir on the stock one.
ashyx said:
I have already compiled a permissive kernel for the T280 and am using it for my TWRP builds but it seems SElinux is still giving issues, so it wont boot the OS.
As usual Samsungs source code is broken and is going to take some time to fix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are able to provide a logcat output I can probably recommend something that you can do.
want to buy this custom kernal.
Hello, do not know yet, if you open update for TAB A 7 T280 2016, your older sister TAB A 10.1 ALREADY RECEIVED OREO, thanks.