Database Users

Weird problems. Whats your opinion?

Thought I'd share my story. I recently got a swap out for a "dusty" screen. My new phone seemed OK. A few days passed by and my camera flash started acting up and not working... Today I woke up and NOTHING on the top half of my phone works. Meaning my ear peice, my 3.5mm jack, my camera, or flash, or proximity/light sensors... nothing. But the speakerphone works, my screen is fine. and my microphone works. kinda odd!
It almost like the top PC board got disconnected internally or something.
Just thought this was a strange issue. Already requested yet ANOTHER swap from HTC. Hopefully this next one can make me beleive this phone was worth it.
On another note. I did get my phone "ghost armored" at a cart in the mall pretty much immediately upon receiving it from fedex. And they do spray a small amount of soapy liquid on the outside of the phone to apply the skins. Do you think this could be enough to cause water damage? I'm afraid HTC is going to charge me for "non warranty problems" if the guys at ghost armor caused this! Its a very "fine mist" they use so I think it would be hard to penetrate the phones seals. But who knows? Whats your opinion?

dills84 said:
Thought I'd share my story. I recently got a swap out for a "dusty" screen. My new phone seemed OK. A few days passed by and my camera flash started acting up and not working... Today I woke up and NOTHING on the top half of my phone works. Meaning my ear peice, my 3.5mm jack, my camera, or flash, or proximity/light sensors... nothing. But the speakerphone works, my screen is fine. and my microphone works. kinda odd!
It almost like the top PC board got disconnected internally or something.
Just thought this was a strange issue. Already requested yet ANOTHER swap from HTC. Hopefully this next one can make me beleive this phone was worth it.
On another note. I did get my phone "ghost armored" at a cart in the mall pretty much immediately upon receiving it from fedex. And they do spray a small amount of soapy liquid on the outside of the phone to apply the skins. Do you think this could be enough to cause water damage? I'm afraid HTC is going to charge me for "non warranty problems" if the guys at ghost armor caused this! Its a very "fine mist" they use so I think it would be hard to penetrate the phones seals. But who knows? Whats your opinion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
water can literally penetrate the smallest most microscopic points. but i dont know think "mist" could do any harm. i think it sucks that you're having bad luck with all these though man.

I like straweberries, they taste good. When eaten slightly chilled they are refreshing as well. And the things you can do with them... fresh fruit topping for cereal, pancakes, yogurt, or you can make them into jam/jelly/compo(sp?)
Anyways, yes, it is possible for your device to have received water damage, this is why I have not and will never put something on my phone that requires the use of water in the application process. And it might even be probable given that on the top of the phone you have a 3.5mm jack, speaker housing, and when you take the back off this gets exposed... and I am guessing they removed the back before misting it, so even more water can get into that area causing major issues.

pjcforpres said:
I like straweberries, they taste good. When eaten slightly chilled they are refreshing as well. And the things you can do with them... fresh fruit topping for cereal, pancakes, yogurt, or you can make them into jam/jelly/compo(sp?)
Anyways, yes, it is possible for your device to have received water damage, this is why I have not and will never put something on my phone that requires the use of water in the application process. And it might even be probable given that on the top of the phone you have a 3.5mm jack, speaker housing, and when you take the back off this gets exposed... and I am guessing they removed the back before misting it, so even more water can get into that area causing major issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, thanks for your opinion on strawberrys.
I believe they remove the battery, but put the battery cover back on before misting. They also leave the device off while they do this and tell you to leave it off for an additional 2 hours (i left mine off for 6 or 7 hours.)

Even leaving it off, if water gets it, it gets in, and starts causing the circuits and what not to corrode.
I will say, I think it is highly unlikely that you do have water damage causing this problem. If HTC says no go, water damage, those misty dudes are responsible and liable to replace your device/pay for repairs. But, I do highly doubt it.
Still, there is a chance of there being water damage, and even if it isn't causing the problem, HTC won't care.
All in all, I would put money that the swap goes just fine, and hopefull 3rd time is the charm for you. It seems some people, no offense, just have really bad luck with these, while others (not to brag), have bought 5 of them without a single problem.

pjcforpres said:
Even leaving it off, if water gets it, it gets in, and starts causing the circuits and what not to corrode.
I will say, I think it is highly unlikely that you do have water damage causing this problem. If HTC says no go, water damage, those misty dudes are responsible and liable to replace your device/pay for repairs. But, I do highly doubt it.
Still, there is a chance of there being water damage, and even if it isn't causing the problem, HTC won't care.
All in all, I would put money that the swap goes just fine, and hopefull 3rd time is the charm for you. It seems some people, no offense, just have really bad luck with these, while others (not to brag), have bought 5 of them without a single problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5 of them?! jeez!
I agree, I'm having really bad luck. I LOVE this phone. Its just getting annoying having to swap it out every other week.
I'm also angry that this broken one has the best screen I've seen on any nexus, no dust, no pink tint. its perfect! and i have to return it
Oh well. thanks for the advice. I feel a little better about the swap now, I cant really afford to lose another 530$.

One for me, and 4 others for friends that had me help them buy one...

Galaxy Tab 10.1 Newton Rings are due to my abuse apparently

Hello all,
First time I have done a post so firstly a hello to everyone. Secondly It is an update/ask for advice time from everyone.
I sent my Galaxy Tab 10.1 in for repair due to the newton rings problems and i have been checking it's progress online. Today a new status came up saying:
"Cancelled by ASC Non Defect (Working properly)"​
When I called up customer services they explain that this could be due to two reasons:
1) They have deemed this as a default due to my use (apparently the more likely of the two)
2) For stats they have closed the case and are waiting for a part.
Has anyone had experience with these people and do they know any of their procedures? Also if they do say it was due to my misuse what are my options?
Sorry for the rant and new thread just need some advice asap.
Liam

I dont understand, why are they waiting for a part if the case is closed?
Worst case you can order a new unit, swap screens, and return it.
Remember $500-$600 for a tablet which costs $120 to make demands perfection.

Exactly that's what i said. The service rep was saying this could be a thing they do to make the statistics of cased open and closed better. However he did say this is a unlikely option.

ok, I think I understand now.
They closed the case because they dont want the case number to remain open in their system and pass SLA "service level agreement" time. This is pretty common in hardware repair.
If this is true then it does sound like they will replace the part.

Well that's good to know. At first i was thinking the person was just fobbing me off. I really hope they do repair the device; If not I will go mental at them.
Thanks for the info.
Also have anyone in the UK got theirs repaired yet?

Evan2ac said:
I dont understand, why are they waiting for a part if the case is closed?
Worst case you can order a new unit, swap screens, and return it.
Remember $500-$600 for a tablet which costs $120 to make demands perfection.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait? It costs $120 to make it, or it's made of $120 worth of bulk parts.
The argument is valid, but not when you twist up reality to make it fit your point. There are other costs involved in making and getting the tablet into your hands than the bulk cost of the parts.

Evan2ac said:
I dont understand, why are they waiting for a part if the case is closed?
Worst case you can order a new unit, swap screens, and return it.
Remember $500-$600 for a tablet which costs $120 to make demands perfection.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sadly I wouldn't have a clue on how to replace it?

For anyone else who has this problem here is an update. They have agreed to replace it but it will take up to 28days. BO

Just buy a new one, swap the back covers, and return the defective one. 28 days is unacceptable for a repair.

Try blowing into the connector pin area & see if that helps you out. Others have reported it working for them. There is a thread in here about it.

RMXO said:
Try blowing into the connector pin area & see if that helps you out. Others have reported it working for them. There is a thread in here about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Blowing in the connector does as much good as blowing in Nintendo cartridges. The screen is sealed and blowing will do nothing.

Evan2ac said:
Just buy a new one, swap the back covers, and return the defective one. 28 days is unacceptable for a repair.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The assertion here being that they don't power on the device and check the serial number, etc., that is electronically embedded in the device? Does that really work?

Another update. I called back and apparently it was sent recorded delivery today. Will let you know when i get it.

Evan2ac said:
Blowing in the connector does as much good as blowing in Nintendo cartridges. The screen is sealed and blowing will do nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tell it to these ppl then
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1222149

Evan2ac said:
Blowing in the connector does as much good as blowing in Nintendo cartridges. The screen is sealed and blowing will do nothing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Being the reason why it does actually help. Because the device is sealed you create a greater pressure on the inside of the device than on the outside. Since the back part is more flexible than the front it moves outward, obviously only slightly, but just enough to reduce pressure of whatever is pressing against the screen from behind. And as pointed out, it is only temporary, as when you stop blowing the over pressure seizes as well.

I also have the problem with Newton Rings, but I think it's because it is a little bent. The corners of the tab does not line up when I put it on a table.
Just thought I should mention this so you guys having newton rings can check if yours is bent as well.
It is not the best built tablet and it might bend a little if you have it with you in a backpack etc..

samsung galaxy tab 10.1 newton rings
be careful when you buy any samsung product from overseas , samsung uk will not honour their warrenty although the problem is a know manufacturing defect
http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=1130230
http://www.yugatech.com/blog/persona...-slick-issues/
http://www.thegalaxytabforum.com/ind...n-rings-issue/
http://galaxytablife.com/2011/07/gal...slick-problem/
http://www.androidpolice.com/2011/07...ings-is-yours/
http://forums.cnet.com/7723-13973_10...sageId=5198453
http://www.iwantadroid.com/2011/07/p...newtons-rings/
https://mobicity.zendesk.com/entries...isture-problem

Solution!
I caught the famous newton rings two days ago after 2 months of ownership - and paniced at once. I read about all the disappointed users and returns and repairs. And decided to do the same. Got a ticket from the berlin workshop, that officially repairs for samsung. But i like experimenting. So i followed some leads before sending in. Put it in the fridge, warm it up on the heating. Both had no effect. At first. Disappointed, I let it lie beside my keyboard and continued working. When i looked at the 10.1 after 40 minutes again, the stain, that measured 2,5 * 5,5 cm in the morning and rather grew bigger when trying to treat, was shrunk to 1*3 cm or so. I did not trust my eyes. After another 10 mins, it was only the size of a fingerprint. And then - the whole screen totally went back to completely normal on its own. No rubbing or pressing could change that development.
My conclusion, and i can not believe, that samsung has not published that quickly and clearely, is that it is a moisture-problem. The weather these days is moist and also, i worked with the tab in moist surrounding lately. The "healing" set in, when i had the tab heated up to ca. 30 - 40 degrees celsius and then let it rest for some time with no cover in a dry room at 20 degrees celsius.
Try it before complaining, if you can live with thecircumstances. I do not know, if the replacement-screens of samsung is different, new at all or only dried by samsung... i will not send in mine anymore.
I can confirm, that the healing by administer some heat is permanent and also by doing the fridge and the heating again after the healing, i could not provoke any stain again.
Good luck!
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda premium

ok guys, so i had this problem pop up a few months after i bougt it, so last week i spoke to the customer service rep and they mailed me a prepaid ups label, i mailed it to texas, 4 days later its back on my door step.
My impressions:1. They definitely changed the screen, the new screen has a slight texture underneath the glass, that isnt noticeable until you look really really hard.
2. The screen brightness, quality is unchanged.
3. The screen now has a dark grey samsung label on the bezel, my tab didnt have the label before.
4. The tab feels a lot more solid than it did before, not that it wasnt solid before, but there was always a very very slight creak when you handled it, especially at the back. It feels like everything is really really tightened now, feels a lot more dense.its a good thing.
5. I cant seem to produce the newton rings now, before they would appear temporarily when i applied slight pressure to the screen, or when i rubbed the screen to remove fingerprints, but now that doesnt happen. The glass feels a little thicker.
6. Another slight difference, is the fingerprints dont seem to show as much as they did before. Its not a major difference, the screen is still a fingerprint magnet.

RMXO said:
Try blowing into the connector pin area & see if that helps you out. Others have reported it working for them. There is a thread in here about it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It worked for a minute. Haha! What will I do to fix it?

SM-G900T finally Dry - Samsung Logo Reboot Loop

I thought my phone was water proof and it would be a good idea to watch GOT underwater.
Fail
3 days later out of the rice bag my phone loads the Samsung Logo, vibrates once then reboots.
I tried putting it in recovery mode, this causes the phone to reboot as well.
I tried putting the phone in download mode, this works.
I found the PIT and official firmware from this site.
I tried using Odin with the firmware first. It complete installed, the progress bar atleast then rebooted.
Once rebooted it showed the recovery booting... for long than usual, then went went into a recovery booting loop.
So I went back to download mode and tried to repartition with Odin with SM-G900T.pit
It immediately said FAILED.
Now I'm stuck.. I tried taking the phone back but they knew it was water related because of some red water mark.
Do I have any other options?

dondrel said:
I thought my phone was water proof and it would be a good idea to watch GOT underwater.
Fail
3 days later out of the rice bag my phone loads the Samsung Logo, vibrates once then reboots.
I tried putting it in recovery mode, this causes the phone to reboot as well.
I tried putting the phone in download mode, this works.
I found the PIT and official firmware from this site.
I tried using Odin with the firmware first. It complete installed, the progress bar atleast then rebooted.
Once rebooted it showed the recovery booting... for long than usual, then went went into a recovery booting loop.
So I went back to download mode and tried to repartition with Odin with SM-G900T.pit
It immediately said FAILED.
Now I'm stuck.. I tried taking the phone back but they knew it was water related because of some red water mark.
Do I have any other options?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hell, flashing pit won't help if you water damaged your phone. And quite frankly, you kinda deserved it, it isn't water proof, it's water resistant.
Enviado do meu Galaxy S5

dandroid13 said:
Hell, flashing pit won't help if you water damaged your phone. And quite frankly, you kinda deserved it, it isn't water proof, it's water resistant.
Enviado do meu Galaxy S5
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't response to this thread anymore.
Any way, I posted this thread because I assumed that since the phone was dry that the damage could possibly only be software related. The screen,battery and download prompt all work fine. I'm wondering if anyone has ever encountered a similar situation before (water related or not) If mature people could response with information that can help other unfortunate people in my situation.

@dondrel
Sorry, but I kinda agree with dandroid13 because you intentionally caused your phone harm. You should have researched first the difference between water-resistant and water-proof. You should have used a water-proof case if you plan on bringing it under water for a long time. But just out of curiosity, how long did you submerged your S5 in water?
The least you could do is to remove the battery and let them all dry for at least 48 hours, focusing a fan on them would be better. Do not attempt to use the phone again. After 2 days, try everything else and see if you would still salvage your phone.

I'm stuck at this point.
SECURE CHECK FAIL : PIT
I'm going to research this issue in Google and see what I can find.

jopat said:
@dondrel
Sorry, but I kinda agree with dandroid13 because you intentionally caused your phone harm. You should have researched first the difference between water-resistant and water-proof. You should have used a water-proof case if you plan on bringing it under water for a long time. But just out of curiosity, how long did you submerged your S5 in water?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't intentionally try to damage my phone.
I was showing off what I thought was a cool feature to my family the first day I got the phone.
If you agree with him then you're no help either.
Any humans here, or just trolls?

LoL
If you can't identify which words we posted are help, it's up to you. Good luck, you won't get any other help from others with that attitude.

Sorry...last post made me smile..."Hey family...look at this its soooo cool. I can watch GoT underwa.....oh....."
But seriously...if youre phone is fully dry and still wont boot I would say you killed it
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk

dondrel said:
Please don't response to this thread anymore.
Any way, I posted this thread because I assumed that since the phone was dry that the damage could possibly only be software related. The screen,battery and download prompt all work fine. I'm wondering if anyone has ever encountered a similar situation before (water related or not) If mature people could response with information that can help other unfortunate people in my situation.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You watch a whole game of thrones under water when the phone can withstand only up to 30 min. Blame yourself and don't open dumb threads.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

I think people are being very rude here, while I am sure that in this particular case the problem hardware related and cannot be repaired by flashing anything, these things are not suppose to happen to a phone that is IP67 certified!
If the phone has been properly handled (battery cover properly closed, back cover properly fitted) then this should not have happened and saying warranty is voided should not hold any grounds! They are advertising this phone as IP67 so they have to live up to that promise and shouldn't be able to just always say it is due to a user error.
I understand that it can be difficult to prove that the user has closed the ports properly, but Samsung should either have built in a system check if everything was closed correctly, they shouldn't have marketed this phone as IP67 or should have known this could happen and simply repair the phones if the exact error couldn't have been found.
I have bought this phone because of a lot of features and IP67 was a big part of that! If this is how Samsung deals with these kinds of situations they will have a hard time dealing with angry customers here in the Netherlands.

johan81 said:
I think people are being very rude here, while I am sure that in this particular case the problem hardware related and cannot be repaired by flashing anything, these things are not suppose to happen to a phone that is IP67 certified!
If the phone has been properly handled (battery cover properly closed, back cover properly fitted) then this should not have happened and saying warranty is voided should not hold any grounds! They are advertising this phone as IP67 so they have to live up to that promise and shouldn't be able to just always say it is due to a user error.
I understand that it can be difficult to prove that the user has closed the ports properly, but Samsung should either have built in a system check if everything was closed correctly, they shouldn't have marketed this phone as IP67 or should have known this could happen and simply repair the phones if the exact error couldn't have been found.
I have bought this phone because of a lot of features and IP67 was a big part of that! If this is how Samsung deals with these kinds of situations they will have a hard time dealing with angry customers here in the Netherlands.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I completely agree with you Jonan81.
I'm just going to ignore the people being jerks on here.
Note: I didn't watch the whole episode, not even 3 minutes
Anyway here's an update on my progress.
I left my phone plugged into the charger, I was getting a battery overheated Icon, (the battery isn't defective, its just that the phone wasn't charging the battery so there is damage in the USB plugin port) So what I did was completely unplug my phone and took out the battery. Held the power button for 10 seconds, put the battery back in and charger and repeated this process 5 times and now I'm able to charge my battery again.
Now if I can re-partition and reinstall the firmware I may have fully fixed my phone.....
I have a few options at this point, wait for the phone to dry more
Send to Samsung and pay them to replace parts (May be expensive)
Find a local place that fixes these issues (Radioshack)
I've decided to goto Radioshack first since it's just up the street to see what they'll say. If they fix it great.. if not I'll try to put it back in rice for a couple of days and work on re-partitioning somehow. If I can't do that then I'll just send it to Samsung.

johan81 said:
I think people are being very rude here, while I am sure that in this particular case the problem hardware related and cannot be repaired by flashing anything, these things are not suppose to happen to a phone that is IP67 certified!
If the phone has been properly handled (battery cover properly closed, back cover properly fitted) then this should not have happened and saying warranty is voided should not hold any grounds! They are advertising this phone as IP67 so they have to live up to that promise and shouldn't be able to just always say it is due to a user error.
I understand that it can be difficult to prove that the user has closed the ports properly, but Samsung should either have built in a system check if everything was closed correctly, they shouldn't have marketed this phone as IP67 or should have known this could happen and simply repair the phones if the exact error couldn't have been found.
I have bought this phone because of a lot of features and IP67 was a big part of that! If this is how Samsung deals with these kinds of situations they will have a hard time dealing with angry customers here in the Netherlands.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung wouldn't care. This phone is water resistant not water proof. If the phone has had some physical damage due to that then you need to take it to samsung cause nobody can help you here
unless it is software related. It Is that simple. Google IP67 for reference too.
dondrel said:
I completely agree with you Jonan81.
I'm just going to ignore the people being jerks on here.
Note: I didn't watch the whole episode, not even 3 minutes
Anyway here's an update on my progress.
I left my phone plugged into the charger, I was getting a battery overheated Icon, (the battery isn't defective, its just that the phone wasn't charging the battery so there is damage in the USB plugin port) So what I did was completely unplug my phone and took out the battery. Held the power button for 10 seconds, put the battery back in and charger and repeated this process 5 times and now I'm able to charge my battery again.
Now if I can re-partition and reinstall the firmware I may have fully fixed my phone.....
I have a few options at this point, wait for the phone to dry more
Send to Samsung and pay them to replace parts (May be expensive)
Find a local place that fixes these issues (Radioshack)
I've decided to goto Radioshack first since it's just up the street to see what they'll say. If they fix it great.. if not I'll try to put it back in rice for a couple of days and work on re-partitioning somehow. If I can't do that then I'll just send it to Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

barondebxl said:
Samsung wouldn't care. This phone is water resistant not water proof. If the phone has had some physical damage due to that then you need to take it to samsung cause nobody can help you here
unless it is software related. It Is that simple. Google IP67 for reference too.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would suggest you search that yourself: Protected against the effect of immersion between 15cm and 1m
This means it can be submerged according to IP67. I hope you drop your phone in water and it dies while you have done nothing wrong, you will be talking differently then.
To get back to your fixing the problem:
I hope flashing your phone will solve it, but I am afraid it will not, I cannot imagine how software gets screwed up by water damage. Though if it does solve it, great work!

johan81 said:
I would suggest you search that yourself: Protected against the effect of immersion between 15cm and 1m
This means it can be submerged according to IP67. I hope you drop your phone in water and it dies while you have done nothing wrong, you will be talking differently then.
To get back to your fixing the problem:
I hope flashing your phone will solve it, but I am afraid it will not, I cannot imagine how software gets screwed up by water damage. Though if it does solve it, great work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have. And I'm smarter than the both of you as my phone is well protected do keep on wishing. Just because it's IP67 I won't go under water just to watch a TV show. But you can do whatever you want with your phone, just don't come here and talk nonsense.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

barondebxl said:
I have. And I'm smarter than the both of you as my phone is well protected do keep on wishing. Just because it's IP67 I won't go under water just to watch a TV show. But you can do whatever you want with your phone, just don't come here and talk nonsense.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, you seem to like avoiding the real message in my reply to avoid having to admit you do not understand a thing you say and then you say you are smarter than us? What kind of a child are you and what meds are you on? You were rudely saying I had to search wat IP67 means while you clearly have no clue yourself and on top of that are blaming someone that does something to his phone that it is supposed to be able to do he shouldn't have done (seeing your level of IQ you probably don't understand a thing I have said here) and then aren't brave enough to admit you were wrong. Ahhh well, no point in trying to educate ignorant/arrogant people like you.

johan81 said:
So, you seem to like avoiding the real message in my reply to avoid having to admit you do not understand a thing you say and then you say you are smarter than us? What kind of a child are you and what meds are you on? You were rudely saying I had to search wat IP67 means while you clearly have no clue yourself and on top of that are blaming someone that does something to his phone that it is supposed to be able to do he shouldn't have done (seeing your level of IQ you probably don't understand a thing I have said here) and then aren't brave enough to admit you were wrong. Ahhh well, no point in trying to educate ignorant/arrogant people like you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't be mad man, you sound ridiculous. You really thing I'm here to debate tou? If I don't know about IP67 then how come I explained to OP in my first reply? Wish all you want, I'm just a little smarter than the 2 of you and I won't just go in water to watch a TV show. But again, you can do that if it's your cup of tea. Just don't come here and cry because you don't know your stuff
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

barondebxl said:
Don't be mad man, you sound ridiculous. You really thing I'm here to debate tou? If I don't know about IP67 then how come I explained to OP in my first reply? Wish all you want, I'm just a little smarter than the 2 of you and I won't just go in water to watch a TV show. But again, you can do that if it's your cup of tea. Just don't come here and cry because you don't know your stuff
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You assume too much, I haven't done anything like that, but if it were ever to happen and the phone breaks, I can comfortably know that Samsung will be the one to pay for repairs since consumer rights are pretty clear here in the Netherlands. No idea what makes you think you are smarter than I am since you do not even know what you are responding to here.

johan81 said:
You assume too much, I haven't done anything like that, but if it were ever to happen and the phone breaks, I can comfortably know that Samsung will be the one to pay for repairs since consumer rights are pretty clear here in the Netherlands. No idea what makes you think you are smarter than I am since you do not even know what you are responding to here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right. Since you're speaking for op I guess I'm speaking to you. Consumers have rights but to a certain extent. Samsung won't entertain stupidity. Google ip67.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk

johan81 said:
I would suggest you search that yourself: Protected against the effect of immersion between 15cm and 1m
This means it can be submerged according to IP67. I hope you drop your phone in water and it dies while you have done nothing wrong, you will be talking differently then.
To get back to your fixing the problem:
I hope flashing your phone will solve it, but I am afraid it will not, I cannot imagine how software gets screwed up by water damage. Though if it does solve it, great work!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I realize that more than likely it's a hardware issue. But since the only operational path I have is Download mode, I just want to exhaust all options and at the least find clues on what is actually failing
Well I'm on my way to RadioShack. Let's see what they say.

barondebxl said:
Right. Since you're speaking for op I guess I'm speaking to you. Consumers have rights but to a certain extent. Samsung won't entertain stupidity. Google ip67.
Sent from my SM-G900T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This shows you are making assumptions without reading what is in front of you, again, you search IP67 since you are the one that doesn't know what it means, from previous experiences with you, you assume to know something you do not.

[Q] what would cause the screen to look like this?

My friend bought a note 4 and after 16 days it began to get purpilish-black splotches that looks like spilled ink on the screen. He brought it to ATT and they tried to tell hi that the screen was cracked (it's not). This picture is what it looks like today (about 20 days after purchase and 4 days after it began to happen). Any clue what would cause this? Any help would be appreciated because ATT is not trying to help at all.
I guess I should mention that his blutooth was having issues since he got it, and sometimes when he'd call people they wouldnt be able to hear him.
I feel as if this is a faulty device, but ATT isn't having it. They keep trying to say he did something to it. The phone is only 3 weeks old, never mishandled, never wet. What could this be?
http://tinypic.com/r/53uzqb/8

Looks like a damaged panel to me

marleyb said:
Looks like a damaged panel to me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
would that be a factory defect?

Hard to say, I doubt they will accept it under warranty
Regards

Happened before on my note 3 after i dropped it. It will only get worst until the entire screen will become black.

It can happen even if the screen is not cracked. Odds are it's the result of the device being mishandled even unintentionally.

Looks like a simple fake.

I wouldn't accept it under warranty, that thing is a mess! No way it happened "on its own". Maybe he was frustrated with the bluetooth and call issues and he threw it against a wall?
iR¡[email protected]!* from Galaxy Note 4 via Tapatalk

Your friend should ask the ATT guys if its was really due to mishandle such as drop or thrown away, they should be some dent or scratch on the phone body. If ATT guys can not find the defect of body dent or scratch, then ur friend have a point there and should can claim under warranty..

Cracks through S7 Edge Screen - No physical reason

Hey Guys,
I have noticed have been a few reports of S7 Edge screens cracking for what seems to be no reason. Mine has lived in a Pelican cover all of its life
I had mine next to my bed last night, before going to sleep I turned it over to be screen side down, and I heard a weird noise coming from it (sounding something like an electrical short). I picked it up, unplugged the charger, and was able to see the cracks appear as they slowly (over about 4 seconds) appeared all over the screen.
From looking at it, the cracks appear to have originated from the volume buttons?
Does anyone have any ideas / other articles / posts that I can see to help me with my case with Samsung warranty in Australia?
Thanks a lot for your help

I did try and insert a link to the photos I took, but as a new member I cannot insert links.

Haven't heard of this issue.
Try mailing me a link through private messaging and I can post it.

There you go.
http://imgur.com/a/3cDKK

It appears that the display cracked from within? Did you apply any considerable force to the volume buttons before this?
Can you feel the cracks when running your finger across the screen?
I'm sorry for your loss, though you actually seem strangely calm when discussing your spontaneously cracking smartphone.

iSaitama said:
It appears that the display cracked from within? Did you apply any considerable force to the volume buttons before this?
Can you feel the cracks when running your finger across the screen?
I'm sorry for your loss, though you actually seem strangely calm when discussing your spontaneously cracking smartphone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The cracks seem to be from within the screen, and you cannot really feel anything from the surface.
There was no unusual force applied to the phone that I can recall.
The part that really confused me, was the fact that it seemed to take about 5 seconds from the start of being able to hear the noise, to the time the cracks had made their way across the screen.
Yeah, not calm, pretty pissed about the whole thing actually. I was hoping I would be able to find a few more examples of this happening to others, but it doesn't appear to be the case.

Contact samsungs customer service, maybe there is a chance that you get it replaced by samsung. Doesn't look like it's your fault.

paysen said:
Contact samsungs customer service, maybe there is a chance that you get it replaced by samsung. Doesn't look like it's your fault.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem will be proving that. I'm not implying the OP isn't being truthful, but you can pretty much guarantee the majority of people that go to Samsung with cracked screens do so whilst claiming that it just happened and the phone hadn't been dropped/manhandled etc, even if they had. Unfortunately, I can't see this being repaired free of charge.
As for the photos, I can't look at them without cringing! I'd be mortified if that happened to mine. Hope you get it sorted.

paysen said:
Contact samsungs customer service, maybe there is a chance that you get it replaced by samsung. Doesn't look like it's your fault.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The phone is currently with a service centre in Perth WA.
The guy I spoke to there was one of the biggest douche bags I have dealt with in a very long time. He had very close to zero interest in helping me, and pretty much laughed me off the whole time.
Yesterday (after about a week of it being at the service centre) I contacted Samsung Support, and they informed me that the warranty case manager at Samsung had rejected my claim as hey do not cover physical damage. I informed her of what had happened to the phone, and why in my opinion it should be covered. She said that there was no information on the Service Request form about what had happenened (written and sent in by the DB in Perth), and all the request said was "Cracked Screen and customer is escalating for Samsung to Cover". There was no information about what I had said happened, and as the case manager does not have the physical device (I am assuming they are on the other side of the country), they just directly rejected it without any thought because they don't normally cover that sort of damage.
Long story short, they are going to re open the service request with the new information and see how it goes.
This time I will be able to speak directly with the Samsung case manager and explain to him my version of events, instead of wasting my time with some smart arsed tech.
Fingers crossed

Simmilar issue like Note 5/ Edge Plus. The problem is from drastic temperatures of charging device and surface of your table/ plot. The phone is very warm because of the charging process but the surface of the plot is cold -> and boom, the screen or glassy back cracking. My opinion is because of the slim body of the device, when the battery going to degredation the dimensions is going bigger and there is a chance to crack the whole device from inside.

Same. S7 Edge Glass Cracked for no Reason
I recognize this thread is old, but same thing happened recently to me with my S7 Edge after less than a month. Never broke a phone ever, had it in a case, didn't drop it. Broke similar to yours. Samsung basically said 'we don't believe you' and that was the end of it. Done with those guys. Nokia was also a once great cellphone Company who similarly got smug like this, and how many of you are carrying Nokias around these days? Exactly, none of us.