Related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZ-h3L5EHt4
Honestly i'm not a huge fan of the physical design, but the UI looks nice
also with the processor at 1.2mhz really not helping either
1.2 or 1.5....I really don't care all that much. Main thing is the optimization to utilize both cores. Looks i4s...its only 800mhz and its fast
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
G1-8701 said:
also with the processor at 1.2mhz really not helping either
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's stock clock is really low. there will be a ton of room for OC
this is my next phone. So glad I waited
Maroon Mushroom said:
it's stock clock is really low. there will be a ton of room for OC
this is my next phone. So glad I waited
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+ 100 Million Billion Million!!!!!!
All true, but i'm still waiting to see the power of the battery and it's internal storage. The only major things i like about this phone is that it's pure android and that it will release with ICS. If the battery is weak and the internal storage is low, i'm either get the SGSII or wait til something else comes out, cause i got a feeling the Galaxy Nexus is gonna be waaaaaay overpriced for pretty much the same specs as the SGSII, but with ICS(which is nice, but i can wait for the release on the atrix or SGSII) plus it's goin to Verizon first and i'm with At&T soooo........
G1-8701 said:
All true, but i'm still waiting to see the power of the battery and it's internal storage. The only major things i like about this phone is that it's pure android and that it will release with ICS. If the battery is weak and the internal storage is low, i'm either get the SGSII or wait til something else comes out, cause i got a feeling the Galaxy Nexus is gonna be waaaaaay overpriced for pretty much the same specs as the SGSII, but with ICS(which is nice, but i can wait for the release on the atrix or SGSII) plus it's goin to Verizon first and i'm with At&T soooo........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1750mAh battery and 16/32gb internal. No expansion slot. This info has been known for a month now.
edgeicator said:
1750mAh battery and 16/32gb internal. No expansion slot. This info has been known for a month now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well thanx for the confirmation, now i definitely kno i'm not getting it, no sdcard slot? and the battery is less then the SGSII(not by much), not worth it......
G1-8701 said:
All true, but i'm still waiting to see the power of the battery and it's internal storage. The only major things i like about this phone is that it's pure android and that it will release with ICS. If the battery is weak and the internal storage is low, i'm either get the SGSII or wait til something else comes out, cause i got a feeling the Galaxy Nexus is gonna be waaaaaay overpriced for pretty much the same specs as the SGSII, but with ICS(which is nice, but i can wait for the release on the atrix or SGSII) plus it's goin to Verizon first and i'm with At&T soooo........
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
With google competing with apple what makes you think it's going to JUST Verizon first? They showed a GSM version not the Lte so looks like we may get it first...
Sent from my MB865 using xda premium
G1-8701 said:
also with the processor at 1.2mhz really not helping either
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its a phone... lol, also. if you heard a zillion times from other people. it is optimized for the hardware. unlike every other android crap phone software out lol. in other words out 1GHz will run like a beast with this if our phone gets it. software is more important than hardware in most cases..
---------- Post added at 03:34 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:32 PM ----------
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vuz6OpWopDw&feature=feedu
on this video john is saying something about how the emulator doesnt use those new buttons on the bottom and that older hardware wont either. im hopeing that means it will come to our phones and we can still use our capatsitive buttons lol
^^^very true....funny so many are whining about the Nexus being clocked at 1.2 instead of 1.5....5mp instead of 8mp. Like many have said...if you're not going to print any pics, MP doesn't matter at all. Im fine with these specs....ill wait and see if our Atrix recieve's the ICS update thru OTA or ROM, if not, hellos Nexus Prime
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
rjayflo said:
^^^very true....funny so many are whining about the Nexus being clocked at 1.2 instead of 1.5....5mp instead of 8mp. Like many have said...if you're not going to print any pics, MP doesn't matter at all. Im fine with these specs....ill wait and see if our Atrix recieve's the ICS update thru OTA or ROM, if not, hellos Nexus Prime
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i don't have a problem with the camera being 5mp, now with the processor stratax cleared that up for me, but no sd card slot, and a 1750mAh battery is gonna disappoint a lot of people just like the nexus s, which is a great phone but could've been better with an sd card slot for people like me that store a lot of music, videos, etc on their phone. My atrix replaced every other device i had(ipod, digital cam, psp) with the 48gbs it holds. But i do believe the Galaxy Nexus will be a great device, just missing a few things
G1-8701 said:
i don't have a problem with the camera being 5mp, now with the processor stratax cleared that up for me, but no sd card slot, and a 1750mAh battery is gonna disappoint a lot of people just like the nexus s, which is a great phone but could've been better with an sd card slot for people like me that store a lot of music, videos, etc on their phone. My atrix replaced every other device i had(ipod, digital cam, psp) with the 48gbs it holds. But i do believe the Galaxy Nexus will be a great device, just missing a few things
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
as for the camera that is true, mp are marketing pretty much. software can make it look better than 99% of 8-12mp cameras out there. hahaha there is no sdcard slot? so many people didnt get the nexus s because of that. you'd think they would learn.. that is the same reason i didnt get the sensation because of low storage. i use my atrix as the same. most of it is music and games lol. which takes up a ton. how can a company make a entertainment device with low storage -_- unless it has like 64gb of storage i wont be happy with it. maybe 32 would be fine but still, im sure it will be expensive.
Am I wasting my time thinking AT&T will subsidize the version with their bands?
rjayflo said:
^^^very true....funny so many are whining about the Nexus being clocked at 1.2 instead of 1.5....5mp instead of 8mp. Like many have said...if you're not going to print any pics, MP doesn't matter at all. Im fine with these specs....ill wait and see if our Atrix recieve's the ICS update thru OTA or ROM, if not, hellos Nexus Prime
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if our phone does not recieve ICS or CM doesnt make a port or whatever im leaving android for sure. im tired of having to switch a freaking device RIGHT after i buy it. WP7 is on the lead with actually updating their phones and crap and have good hardware requirements without fragmentation. i know that technology gets updated fast blah blah. its just crap what google does lol. i like the big leap they are taking, but they need to AT LEAST update ICS on all the dual core phones that have been released. that would be pretty sweet
LSUtigers03 said:
Am I wasting my time thinking AT&T will subsidize the version with their bands?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AT&T and T-mobile versions have already cleared the FCC.... just a matter of when.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
stratax said:
if our phone does not recieve ICS or CM doesnt make a port or whatever im leaving android for sure. im tired of having to switch a freaking device RIGHT after i buy it. WP7 is on the lead with actually updating their phones and crap and have good hardware requirements without fragmentation. i know that technology gets updated fast blah blah. its just crap what google does lol. i like the big leap they are taking, but they need to AT LEAST update ICS on all the dual core phones that have been released. that would be pretty sweet
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reported that all devices currently running Gingerbread will receive ICS... just a matter of when... remember, Moto has to put their Motoblur crap in it first.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Swiftks said:
Reported that all devices currently running Gingerbread will receive ICS... just a matter of when... remember, Moto has to put their Motoblur crap in it first.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not receive. Support. IE their hardware is enough to run 4.0. There is 0 guarantee they will get ICS.
Swiftks said:
Reported that all devices currently running Gingerbread will receive ICS... just a matter of when... remember, Moto has to put their Motoblur crap in it first.
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i guess even if it doesnt come someone/team will most likely port it lol. wonder what will become of the cyanogenmod team
G1-8701 said:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aZ-h3L5EHt4
Honestly i'm not a huge fan of the physical design, but the UI looks nice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The biggest thing wrong with that video, "TWO HANDS!"
Even when that thing was in landscape, I couldn't tell if he was holding the Nexus or a PSP. (Although ICS does look nice)
Finally what is it with Nexus phones and lack of ext SD cards lately?... *shrug*
Sent from my MB860 using xda premium
I just got the tmobile version of this phone today through work to try out for a couple of months. If there is anything I can check out on it to get you guys more info let me know.
Pictures?make a video?
please please post benchmark, specs, list of apps, and photos
thanks in advance
EDIT: also, run a voodoo report!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Benchmarks, battery life, and usability. My only question is how does the S4 perform vs Exynos in the GS3 and whether there is any improvement over battery life/usability w/ the chipset and extra ram. I would trade raw power for better battery and potentially better app performance.
Do you work for Tmobile or something? How is it that you got to test one out? And is this the U.S. version? I would be interested to know if the U.S. versions really do have 2gb of ram. And also if it also has the Wolfson audio DAC like the international version.
gibsonsg412 said:
I just got the tmobile version of this phone today through work to try out for a couple of months. If there is anything I can check out on it to get you guys more info let me know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Benchmarks of all kinds.
Also, how much RAM is actually available after the Adreno takes up some of it's ram. Can you give a screenshot?
Amazing... can you run benchmarks... how fluid is it?
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda premium
Sweeet, lucky! Questions:
- what color is yours?
- is the only T-Mob branding on the back cover?
- how's the battery?
- can you test out some graphic intense games, how do they run?
- does the pop-out video function run smoothly while multi-tasking?
- how many apps can you open up before things noticeably get laggy?
So excited for the US launch!
If the T-Mobile Galaxy S III is carrier unlocked can you test to see if this works with the other major GSM provider like AT&T for 3G/HSPA+?
Earlier it was reported that from the Engadget & The Verge that FCC report had the T-Mo version capable of running both T-Mobile and 1900 band of AT&T.
Thanks in advance!
Can you help me get one? lulz.
Do you have the firmware in TAR format?
I need it badly. I have the same unit as yours.
If you can even give me the stock kernel, it would help to start.
May be my problem is the kernel....
The guy has 1 post and registered within the past 4 days. I think you are all getting trolled.
HaruSoul said:
The guy has 1 post and registered within the past 4 days. I think you are all getting trolled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the same, who knows
I'm getting my S3 next week! can't wait
Yeah I call BS! OP has one post and no replies to the comments on this thread.
we just got trolled mod close this please
Yeah, we probably got trolled. But a few blog android websites are getting the phone within this week to check out and give a test run.
I'm going to LOL when he replies with pictures of a Tmobile branded gs3
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
bloodrain954 said:
I'm going to LOL when he replies with pictures of a Tmobile branded gs3
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And what are you going to do when he doesn't? Just pretend that you never made that post?
bloodrain954 said:
I'm going to LOL when he replies with pictures of a Tmobile branded gs3
Sent from my HTC One X using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I'm gonna lol when he doesn't.
Sent from anyone of my ICS devices.
I think this picture shows the galaxy s4 gt-i9505 in antutu now I'm not sure if this is infact the s4 but clocked at 1890 mhz it seems very possible
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Do not believe a benchmark unless you faked it yourself.
Theshawty said:
Do not believe a benchmark unless you faked it yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Completely agree
It's a simple matter to change the device name and model number, and overclock it to the desired frequency. After that, modify the files of the score data, and voilà, we have the Galaxy s4, or really any device you want
Sent from my GT-I9100
If I helped you, please hit the thanks button!
Will not believe it until I see it with my own eyes...
Anyways, if that's real, not a bad benchmark! Do you imagine what we can do overcloking a 1.9GHz CPU? That would be a f***ing burning S4... Unless they put a fan in the case
Theshawty said:
Do not believe a benchmark unless you faked it yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:good:
---------- Post added at 07:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 07:23 PM ----------
botedelejia said:
Will not believe it until I see it with my own eyes...
Anyways, if that's real, not a bad benchmark! Do you imagine what we can do overcloking a 1.9GHz CPU? That would be a f***ing burning S4... Unless they put a fan in the case
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no its bad if its real
Tegra 4 got 36000 in antutu
Why would the s4 shop with android 4.2.1?
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda app-developers app
JAMIE1000UK said:
Why would the s4 shop with android 4.2.1?
Sent from my GT-P7510 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because Sh*tsung can't do anything right and most likely send it out with 4.2.1.
Theshawty said:
Because Sh*tsung can't do anything right and most likely send it out with 4.2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Miss a x.x.1 update, yes they are crap.
drakester09 said:
Miss a x.x.1 update, yes they are crap.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah they suck.....and htc are great releasing phone with "newest" 4.1.2....i think it will be released with 4.2.2....and even if it wont...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Its soo fake its unbeleivable, reasons:
1. S4 will probably have 4g as standard so there is no need for the i9505
2. benchmark is lower than a note 2
3. 4.2.1 WTF!
Anyway exynos 5 will be beast and is pointless if the processor is around the same performance of note 2.
also you think samsung hasnt got their own way of benchmarking the phone?
they know power is important in this years flagship and they are not likely to be worse than what qualcomm has to give.
So you think before you post, this is faked.
deleted
pashinator said:
Its soo fake its unbeleivable, reasons:
1. S4 will probably have 4g as standard so there is no need for the i9505
2. benchmark is lower than a note 2
3. 4.2.1 WTF!
Anyway exynos 5 will be beast and is pointless if the processor is around the same performance of note 2.
also you think samsung hasnt got their own way of benchmarking the phone?
they know power is important in this years flagship and they are not likely to be worse than what qualcomm has to give.
So you think before you post, this is faked.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep in mind that exynos 5 will be a beast, but mostly in the energy efficiency area. As the technical from Samsung explained, all 8 cores will NEVER run in the same time, it will be basically a quad-core running an ARM7 processor base in low demanding tasks and an ARM15 processor base when at full power.
Still, scores are very low anyway and i assume that if someone tried to "fool us", has set an 1.9ghz value considering that it will have an Snapdragon processor, as Samsung never released a running freq for their exynos.
100% fake, some random overclocked phone with ro.product.model=xxx changed to read ro.product.model=GT-I9505. Takes a few seconds to do.
could you please tell me how to modify the screen pixel ?
Theshawty said:
Because Sh*tsung can't do anything right and most likely send it out with 4.2.1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pashinator said:
3. 4.2.1 WTF!.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you for real? 4.2.2 just only hit AOSP 2 freaking weeks ago on February 11th.
People need to get over it that this is most probably is the version they'll be releasing. Edit: I'm talking about the Snapdragon version of the phone.
Why would you trust a benchmark ? You get different results each time you start one.
Ignorance is near impossible to prevent but manners are easily controlled. There is no need for such blatant flaming on here and it seems the developers get away with it all the time....
Anyway. Back on topic. If it was real, it doesn't look like it's set to blow any minds. If it's not. Just hang tight and wait...
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
Theshawty said:
Sony? Yeah they're even worse with updates but at least they support the developers, plus timescape ui looks undeniably better than crapwiz.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL how many people care about AOSP ?? HMM...maybe 10% or less ( i know CM team done great job though to bring stable AOSP build )
timescape is just crappy laggy boring useless UI , i prefer TW all the day over any other Android Frameworks and lunchers
if u want the best AOSP experience just get a Nexus
Jeez guys calm down. What I think is that samsungs developers are not small scale one-man per device jobs. I beleive that samsung collaborates with other workers to merge aosp and touchwiz using well known GIT. They mihgt be a big team that can accomplish a 4.2.1 to 4.2.2 in a matter of two weeks. Dont forget, our s3 just had a leak that works and I am sure we are not priority at samsung devs. I think they would have an efficient task force that could easily do what you said is crazy quite easily. Plus I am sure that they would atleast merge aosp code 4.2.2 and then continue bugfixing. Btw andreilux, its quite obvious that its fake even if we dont agree on the reasons.
And Note II is still up top
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 using XDA Premium HD app
Obviously we are all waiting for the Note 4, yet it's Pricey.
Now comes the hard question.
Which one to buy ? and
Which will the Dev support ? (Future Proofing)
N910C or N910S
Snapdragon over Exynos
We all saw it in the S4 between the 9505 and 9500 so I don't want to get stuck in the same loop.
Please advise at the earliest since all the articles on the Web refer to Chip variants and differences yet no one has a solid answer to which will be supported and would be considered as a real investment. I hear the Exynos is benchmarked with 40K therefore exceeding our favorite Snapdragon chip !?
That makes it even worse to decide
International version is snapdragon if u care about custom stuff go for it.
tmac31 said:
International version is snapdragon if u care about custom stuff go for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kinda. There's now multiple international versions and some are Exynos (some of Europe, Aus, NZ, HK and Korea)
tarektarabichi said:
Obviously we are all waiting for the Note 4, yet it's Pricey.
Now comes the hard question.
Which one to buy ? and
Which will the Dev support ? (Future Proofing)
N910C or N910S
Snapdragon over Exynos
We all saw it in the S4 between the 9505 and 9500 so I don't want to get stuck in the same loop.
Please advise at the earliest since all the articles on the Web refer to Chip variants and differences yet no one has a solid answer to which will be supported and would be considered as a real investment. I hear the Exynos is benchmarked with 40K therefore exceeding our favorite Snapdragon chip !?
That makes it even worse to decide
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think the exynos version(s) this time around may prove to be a bit more popular because the believe (uncertain) that the 5433 will run 64bit (future proofing).
mangui said:
I think the exynos version(s) this time around may prove to be a bit more popular because the believe (uncertain) that the 5433 will run 64bit (future proofing).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tough to say, All of the USA market will have snapdragon, as will many other countries. That means there will be a greater percentage of "market share" of the S805 version with a better chance of having dev support on it.
Snapdragon
This is a million dollar question right here...
shabbypenguin said:
Tough to say, All of the USA market will have snapdragon, as will many other countries. That means there will be a greater percentage of "market share" of the S805 version with a better chance of having dev support on it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hey, shabby, good to see you!
are you grabbing one of these bad boys?
wase4711 said:
hey, shabby, good to see you!
are you grabbing one of these bad boys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got a black one at bestbuy waiting for me, wife went with the white one.
shabbypenguin said:
Got a black one at bestbuy waiting for me, wife went with the white one.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats great to hear!
u planning on doing any dev work on this thing, or just gonna enjoy it?
I can't decide between the white or the black myself; I'd get the gold one just to be different, but, it wont be out for awhile, so dont want to wait for it..
As soon as i have the files i plan on working on recovery and if I get bored enough maybe more.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
shabbypenguin said:
As soon as i have the files i plan on working on recovery and if I get bored enough maybe more.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool; having a working twrp right out of the box would be fantastic..
looks like Chainfire already has root under control..
JediRhymeTrix said:
This is a million dollar question right here...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hahaha that's so true. Snap will have better dev support and GPU while the exynos MIGHT be 64bit enabled anytime soon and is definitely faster, but still not sure of how faster in daily use. Now it's up to you and wait for more information to come. For now, that's about it.
shabbypenguin said:
As soon as i have the files i plan on working on recovery and if I get bored enough maybe more.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shabbypenguin good to see you on the note 4. BTW what carrier are you getting the note with... I'm hoping att...
Sent from my Note3 Rocking DynamicKat or my G3
RiNo808 said:
Shabbypenguin good to see you on the note 4. BTW what carrier are you getting the note with... I'm hoping att...
Sent from my Note3 Rocking DynamicKat or my G3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No such luck I have sprint service. Sides having a locked Note 4 wouldnt be much fun or do me any good with trying for recovery
It was wishful thinking... If anyone could find a way to get a recovery on att, It would be you...
Sent from my Note3 Rocking DynamicKat or my G3
RiNo808 said:
It was wishful thinking... If anyone could find a way to get a recovery on att, It would be you...
Sent from my Note3 Rocking DynamicKat or my G3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you give me far too much credit, i port recoveries and do minor things. bootloader exploits are beyond my scope of even understanding how many actually work.
The Exynos model should be faster, better on battery, and possibly offer 64-bit down the road. I'm going with that one.
Hey guys! Just got myself an S7 Edge yesterday and would like to root it, but I'm clueless when it comes to phones. I've rooted and debloated my Galaxy Tab S, but that's it. I just want to make sure I don't mess up this beauty.
Can anyone point me to the first step?
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
noxarcana said:
Hey guys! Just got myself an S7 Edge yesterday and would like to root it, but I'm clueless when it comes to phones. I've rooted and debloated my Galaxy Tab S, but that's it. I just want to make sure I don't mess up this beauty.
Can anyone point me to the first step?
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup.
First step is reading.
God luck.
Binary100100 said:
Yup.
First step is reading.
God luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea, I felt really stupid after posting this. I continued looking through the forum and realized I had somehow looked right over that thread! ? Thanks for taking the time to point the way though. It's appreciated!
Sent from my SM-T700 using Tapatalk
First be sure what kind edge you have snapdragon or exynox if you have exynox basically is easy but it's snapdragon has to work little bit more (sorry for my English)
Elvys702 said:
First be sure what kind edge you have snapdragon or exynox if you have exynox basically is easy but it's snapdragon has to work little bit more (sorry for my English)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are all T-Mobile S7 Edges not the same CPU type?
Sent from my SM-T700 using Tapatalk
noxarcana said:
Are all T-Mobile S7 Edges not the same CPU type?
Sent from my SM-T700 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The S7 Edge is powered by either a 2.15GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or 2.3 GHz Exynos 8890 processor, depending on region, and comes with 4GB of RAM.
Qualcomm processors found by US carriers have locked bootloaders.
Exynos found in other countries (with some exception) are unlocked.
Rooting methods are totally different.
Binary100100 said:
The S7 Edge is powered by either a 2.15GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 or 2.3 GHz Exynos 8890 processor, depending on region, and comes with 4GB of RAM.
Qualcomm processors found by US carriers have locked bootloaders.
Exynos found in other countries (with some exception) are unlocked.
Rooting methods are totally different.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah...okay. I've got the Snapdragon variant then.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Spid3rtech said:
Why worry? Even if you mess up you can just flash it. Which is reinstalling the version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not so much worried as I am just being cautious because I next to nothing of bootloader's and such. I've never done anything "advanced" with an Android phone. It's always been with wifi-only devices.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk