I was wondering if I could use a i5 Intel processor fom a elite book 8540p in a probook 6550b that has a i3 Intel processor.
Depends on the chip set of the mother board. Google both for compatible chips. See if it will work.
Related
Is it true that Qualcomm's dual-core CPU's will be based on the older ARM Cortex-A8 architecture set instead of the modern Cortex-A9 which is being used by Apple's A5 Chip and Nvidia'S Tegra 2 ?
Source:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/for...msm8660-12ghz-dual-core-snapdragon-processor/
The hardware benchmarks on the dual-core MSM8x60 1.2 Ghz chip used by HTC Pyramid (Sensation,Doubleshot) and the Evo-3D do not look pretty good.
Source:
http://smartphonebenchmarks.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=258
Need a bit of clarification on this issue why they didn't choose the Cortex-A9 path.
Ok so I just read this report from Qualcomm explaining this issue:
http://www.qualcomm.de/documents/files/linley-report-dual-core-snapdragon.pdf
Apparently their architecture set is compatible with ARM's instruction architecture set and they claim its better than the A9.
"The superscalar CPU uses a 13-stage pipeline to generate faster clock speeds than competing products can achieve using ARM’s Cortex-A8 or Cortex-A9"
Having said that still not sure why the hardware benchmarks are not near the Cortex-A9 dual-core processors.
Adreno-220 is pretty good though compared to other GPU's.
mjehan said:
Apparently their architecture set is compatibily with ARM's instruction architecture set and they claim its better than the A9.
Having said that still not sure why the hardware benchmarks are not near the Cortex-A9 dual-core processors.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because bechmarks are meaningless and HTC have yet to put the work into fiddling them yet!
Quamcomm has been claiming that their design is better than ARM's Cortex A8 before but other than few special occasions, they are mostly equal at the same clock speed. Since MSM8x60 is also based on the identical cores, I don't see how it could be better than Cortex A9. In fact, Qualcomm is working on their own "equivalent to A9" version right now.
FYI, # of pipelines don't tell the whole story about the speed of CPUs. If not implemented well, it will simply cause longer stall delays. We have seen this in the old Pentium 4 architectures.
I think the 128bit fpu makes scorpion equivalent to a9 in floating points calculation
Sent via psychic transmittion.
Just saw this on CNET: http://www.cnet.com/news/at-t-gophone-gets-entry-level-asus-zenfone-2e/
Specifications show that it only has 1 GB of RAM, so the bloatware might be more reduced
Thoughts comparing it to the 500CL maybe?
Intel CPU and 120$ If it has microSD its a good deal since internal storage is low.
aziz07 said:
Intel CPU and 120$ If it has microSD its a good deal since internal storage is low.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, it has "MicroSD card (up to 64 GB)". I wonder what the specs of that Intel Atom are. Maybe 1.5GHz?
''You can buy the black or white Asus ZenFone 2E at Walmart and Target stores immediately'' lols They get it before cellphone companies.
Since its x86_64 dual-core, I guess it will be a 64Bit Z3480 2.13Ghz or Z3460 1.6Ghz with half the Z3580 2Mb cache. Its their only two dual-core processors in Atom 3xxx series. They won't for sure use a 2 years old Atom 2xxx CPU.
This is a good site for hardware benchmarks in performance order:
Intel Atom Z3580 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3580-SoC.123974.0.html
Intel Atom Z3480 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3480-SoC.123588.0.html
Intel Atom Z3460 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3460-SoC.123585.0.html
aziz07 said:
''You can buy the black or white Asus ZenFone 2E at Walmart and Target stores immediately'' lols They get it before cellphone companies.
Since its x86_64 dual-core, I guess it will be a 64Bit Z3480 2.13Ghz or Z3460 1.6Ghz with half the Z3580 2Mb cache. Its their only two dual-core processors in Atom 3xxx series. They won't for sure use a 2 years old Atom 2xxx CPU.
This is a good site for hardware benchmarks in performance order:
Intel Atom Z3580 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3580-SoC.123974.0.html
Intel Atom Z3480 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3480-SoC.123588.0.html
Intel Atom Z3460 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3460-SoC.123585.0.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well its an AT&T exclusive right now apparently, so I guess its locked to GoPhone.
aziz07 said:
''You can buy the black or white Asus ZenFone 2E at Walmart and Target stores immediately'' lols They get it before cellphone companies.
Since its x86_64 dual-core, I guess it will be a 64Bit Z3480 2.13Ghz or Z3460 1.6Ghz with half the Z3580 2Mb cache. Its their only two dual-core processors in Atom 3xxx series. They won't for sure use a 2 years old Atom 2xxx CPU.
This is a good site for hardware benchmarks in performance order:
Intel Atom Z3580 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3580-SoC.123974.0.html
Intel Atom Z3480 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3480-SoC.123588.0.html
Intel Atom Z3460 http://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-Atom-Z3460-SoC.123585.0.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it's the good old Z2560. This phone is basically just a rebranded ZE500CL.
kanagawaben said:
No, it's the good old Z2560. This phone is basically just a rebranded ZE500CL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:crying: Was too good for 120$ I guess. How does the Z2560 compare to Z3460?
aziz07 said:
:crying: Was too good for 120$ I guess. How does the Z2560 compare to Z3460?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the 3000 series has nearly twice the performance per clock of the 2000 series, and a much improved GPU and turbo speeds.
I don't understand why they don't use Intel's 14nm CPUs. They are much cheaper, faster, more efficient and smaller.
CPU+GPU TDP 2W: http://ark.intel.com/products/85474/Intel-Atom-x5-Z8500-Processor-2M-Cache-up-to-2_24-GHz
Something like Atom X3 or X5. 14nm Intel Core M is targeted at tablets with 4.5W TDP but is close in performance to an Intel i3 2n Gen or i5 1st Gen.
I mean if there are 10.6'' 299$ Intel Core M tablets with 4Gb DDR3 64GB SSD 64GB ROM, why not the Atom 14m in cellphones?
(Source: http://www.aliexpress.com/store/pro...875.html?spm=5261.7756712.1998621897.2.Au3JOm)
I think that this is more of a clearance initiative for the CL models not really selling that much..take the remaining hardware... Build up a model for the lowest price point and realign sales accordingly.. More or less like the outrageous difference between the sales of the S6 and the S6 Edge.. The Edge is atleast 3x in sales whereas the "simple" version is being offered with 30% discount... It's simple business..
What is this, i read everywhere that the Tegra X1 i an octa core with 4x a57 and 4x a53 cpus, yet i received the console today and all apps report it as being octacore, only seeing/using the a57 cores and not the a53 cores. to all of it it seems like nviidia has changed their page so that it reflects the shield tv to be quadcore???
http://shield.nvidia.com/android-tv/shield-androidtv-vs-appletv-vs-roku-vs-firetv
are other people seeing this as well (for instance if you check with aida64 or with 3dmark), perhaps firmware blocked with new firmwares or is the hardware in the newer consoles actually inferior to the older ones?
I've only ever seen the Shield advertised as quad core even if the SoC is 8 core
Hello want to change my aunt and I am in big trouble
My choices are an Android device based on MTK 8127A from ATOTO but that come with 2 GB of RAM or a regular one based on PX 5 which come with 4 GB of RAM.
I understand that the MTK car goes devices are a little bit rare
So what to choose:
ATOTO with a MTK PROCESSOR and 2 GB of RAM, pretty good support and rom updates or a PX 5 ?
Which is faster and more stable?
Thank you
sandibad said:
Hello want to change my aunt and I am in big trouble
My choices are an Android device based on MTK 8127A from ATOTO but that come with 2 GB of RAM or a regular one based on PX 5 which come with 4 GB of RAM.
I understand that the MTK car goes devices are a little bit rare
So what to choose:
ATOTO with a MTK PROCESSOR and 2 GB of RAM, pretty good support and rom updates or a PX 5 ?
Which is faster and more stable?
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From what i have heard, MediaTek has better reputation than Rockchip. Which one is more stable / faster depends on how the SoC is integrated into the platform, how the Software Governers control the clock rate of the SoC. So this is difficult to answer strictly based on the SoC chip itself.
SoC Chip: MTK 8127A
Soc-based Quad-core 1.5Ghz Cortex A7 CPU
GPU ARM Mali-450 MP4 .
System Version: ATOTO AICE OS 9.4, which is developed & customized based on Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PX5
8 core ARM Cortex-A53 (ARMv8) 1,5 GHz
GPU owerVR SGX6110 jusqu'à 600 Mhz (OpenGL 3.2, OpenGL ES 1.1/2.0/3.1, OpenCL, DirectX9.3)
Android 8.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but there are also :
PX6 ! devices (but it's news no more info a this moment) :
Android 8,1
CPUX6 RK3399
2 Core cortex A72 2ghz
4 Core Cortex A53 1.5ghz
RAM: SAMSUNG DDR3 4 GB
https://forum.xda-developers.com/an...-android-unit-cortex-a72-four-cortex-t3847427
And A72 Core is a lot better than A53, and A53 is a little bit better than the very old Cortex A7
I agree with @mum1989 that A72 and A53 CPU cores have much better specifications than the A7. If the applications you run on the head unit can take advantage of the ARMv8 instruction set or if the workload can be distributed across the cores, then PX6/PX6 SoC may well perform better than MTK8127A. On the other hand, in my day-to-day use of ATOTO A6 Pro which uses MTK8127A, I have never observed it to be slow or stutter or otherwise show signs that older A72 Core was limiting the end-user experience.
Found a headunit on ali, and the specs say it uses an MTK processor I wasn't able to find any info.
They claim the processor is an MTK 5760B Processor, Octa Core 2.5 GHz . Does this even exist?
Here's a link to the actual device if it matters (it's the 8gb model):
https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004275908437.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.main.1.2e9b8588OQYHq5&algo_pvid=52dc1554-fd09-426a-9677-22d515a5958e&algo_exp_id=52dc1554-fd09-426a-9677-22d515a5958e-0&pdp_ext_f=%7B%22sku_id%22%3A%2212000028597734052%22%7D&pdp_npi=3%40dis%21CAD%21664.1%21451.58%21%21%21%21%21%40211bd93f16757935828566584d0717%2112000028597734052%21sea%21CA%21131826539&curPageLogUid=1I5QuJfeOB7t
I guess it's a fantasy name
https://forum.xda-developers.com/t/...stions-couldnt-find-any-info-about-it.4171219
The fact that the processor cannot be identified alone should be enough to inform to avoid the unit entirely.