How do you think, is there any chance for ja3g to get a stable release? Nightlies started rolling out once in 2 days already. Does this mean it is almost abandoned? Or closer to a stable release?
@Alberto96 , may I have your opinion on this also?
Mango Polo said:
How do you think, is there any chance for ja3g to get a stable release? Nightlies started rolling out once in 2 days already. Does this mean it is almost abandoned? Or closer to a stable release?
@Alberto96 , may I have your opinion on this also?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you want a "stable" version? It's only a label. If a rom works then it works. It doesn't matter if it's labeled: Alpha, beta, stable, nightlies etc.
Lennyz1988 said:
Why do you want a "stable" version? It's only a label. If a rom works then it works. It doesn't matter if it's labeled: Alpha, beta, stable, nightlies etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 to this, also i will add, the i9500 ja3g has exynos CPU and the drivers are not released, so there be always more problems to solve issues or to get an stable version of CM.
Cyanogenmod have dropped the "stable" naming label a while back. From then on releases will be named either "nightly" or "snapshot"/"milestone"(M). Any specific device will only get a Milestone/snapshot release if there is an active developer for that specific device and if that developer marks the device as ready when builds are run. Many of the devices currently getting nightly builds have no active developers and as such will not receive milestone builds. This seems to be the case for the I9505, not sure about yours, though.
Lennyz1988 said:
Why do you want a "stable" version? It's only a label. If a rom works then it works. It doesn't matter if it's labeled: Alpha, beta, stable, nightlies etc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I had a clear reason to start this question because , actually, the ROM works, but until now, it is full of bugs. And we all know about it.
Related
Which version of cyanogen 7.1 is the most stable?
g33kChic said:
Which version of cyanogen 7.1 is the most stable?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7.1 Stable is the most stable.
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/32463-cyanogenmod-7-for-the-htc-glacier-v710-9-oct-2011/
neidlinger said:
CM7.1 Stable is the most stable.
http://forum.cyanogenmod.com/topic/32463-cyanogenmod-7-for-the-htc-glacier-v710-9-oct-2011/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you! I was kinda getting confused with RC, Stable, and the nigthly versions.
Are they all the same or are they different from each other?
g33kChic said:
Thank you! I was kinda getting confused with RC, Stable, and the nigthly versions.
Are they all the same or are they different from each other?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nightlies - are updated VERY frequently and may contain a fair amount of bugs, but have the newest features, security patches, and will be the latest variant of Android. may be considers alphas
RC- Release Clients are less buggy, updated less frequently but will contain some newer features
Stables are the least buggy, updated every now and then and will not contain some features that some RCs, and most nightlies have.
Personally i use Nightlies and update every week and do not run into problems.
You should give Euroskank's CM7 Kang a shot. Or otherwise knows as "Gigglebread"
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/gigglebread/glacier/
It's been very good on my G2x.
Which version to install on my wildfire?the latest version or 2.3.3?thanks (most stable and fully functional)
ivor89 said:
Which version to install on my wildfire?the latest version or 2.3.3?thanks (most stable and fully functional)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The wildfire only goes to 2.2 officialy. CM7 latest build has 2.3.7 and its stable (not including nightlies)
Is that version in stable or night mod?and can can you explain what nightlies is?
Nightlies, from what I know, is a build that they release every night and some times is really buggy but you get the occasional one that is stable. I just stick with the stable releases not the nightlies. Um there is a stable release out.
Here's the link:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1143125
Also the easy way to install it is to use rom manager and make sure you do nandroid backup before you install any roms
BaD_RoBoTs said:
Nightlies, from what I know, is a build that they release every night and some times is really buggy but you get the occasional one that is stable. I just stick with the stable releases not the nightlies. Um there is a stable release out.
Here's the link:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1143125
Also the easy way to install it is to use rom manager and make sure you do nandroid backup before you install any roms
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to contradict you but the nightlies in my opinion are just as stable as the stable version, you see a lot of the bugs you may read about in various threads are through user error not the actual rom itself. And been able to use new features long before they are released in a stable version far outweighs the amount of bugs.
I've been on nightlies for about 4 months and only ever had 1 bug, the camera wouldn't work a couple of days ago but Arco already knew why and it was fixed the next day!
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Scratch0805 said:
Sorry to contradict you but the nightlies in my opinion are just as stable as the stable version, you see a lot of the bugs you may read about in various threads are through user error not the actual rom itself. And been able to use new features long before they are released in a stable version far outweighs the amount of bugs.
I've been on nightlies for about 4 months and only ever had 1 bug, the camera wouldn't work a couple of days ago but Arco already knew why and it was fixed the next day!
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I've only ever used the stable releases. Never quite tryed nightlies. mayby you can say what version of nightlies is stable and then I can have a look for myself. What are the changes so far included in the nightlies?
BaD_RoBoTs said:
Yeah I've only ever used the stable releases. Never quite tryed nightlies. mayby you can say what version of nightlies is stable and then I can have a look for myself. What are the changes so far included in the nightlies?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the nightlies I've tried have been stable, I know they had problems in the early stages with bootloops etc but I've been on them since about nightly 100 and never had any major issues apart from my own stupidity.
There is a changelog knocking about somewhere. I'll see if I can find the link later.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Scratch0805 said:
All the nightlies I've tried have been stable, I know they had problems in the early stages with bootloops etc but I've been on them since about nightly 100 and never had any major issues apart from my own stupidity.
There is a changelog knocking about somewhere. I'll see if I can find the link later.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://cm-nightlies.appspot.com/?device=buzz
Here you go,I have it bookmarked.
sent from my emmaroid infected wilderbeast
Thanks I try it out
cm 7.1.0.1 is a stable mod ROM and try to flash using cmw.it is safer and have a clear installation process.wipe cache,data and system partition from cmw itself...
befor all this plz have a nandroid backup.
I'm probably going to install this on my Nexus 5. Which build is the most stable and most functional? I'm asking because as of right now, it seems that the only builds avaliable are nightlies.
pyrogoggles said:
I'm probably going to install this on my Nexus 5. Which build is the most stable and most functional? I'm asking because as of right now, it seems that the only builds avaliable are nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All KitKat builds are nightlies at this stage. No ETA on stable builds at this stage.
Langes said:
All KitKat builds are nightlies at this stage. No ETA on stable builds at this stage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would you happen to know if there's one that is the most stable? Or should I just flash the most recent?
pyrogoggles said:
Would you happen to know if there's one that is the most stable? Or should I just flash the most recent?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best to check the Hammerhead thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5/development/rom-pac-version-t2670238
05/06 has the least bugs from current nightlies
I'll admit I get completely baffled with all the S4 variants.
1. Put simply is there a UK GT-I9505 Cyanogenmod 12 or 12.1 nightly?
2. What's device name to Cyanogenmod call it?
My GT-I9505 is from Everything Everywhere in the UK (who still haven't released lollipop).
Thanks
1. Yes.
2. jfltexx.
Perfect. Thanks.
jfltexx Snapshots stopped in February 2014 with M3. Which is weird as my LG G Pad last got a stable build in November 2014 with M12. That's a bit worrying if I want a stable/reliable CM build.
p.s. Stable being used generally. I'm aware CM used to use Stable as a specific naming convention.
bradavon said:
Perfect. Thanks.
jfltexx Snapshots stopped in February 2014 with M3. Which is weird as my LG G Pad last got a stable build in November 2014 with M12. That's a bit worrying if I want a stable/reliable CM build.
p.s. Stable being used generally. I'm aware CM used to use Stable as a specific naming convention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nightlies are more stable then the snapshots. So don't let naming misguide you. Just go for either the nightlies or the one in my signature. Ps go for the 12.1 branch, more stable then the 12 branch.
Really?
I thought the whole point was Stables were signed off?
Nightlies also updated daily which is bewildering. I just want a stable Android 5.1 release really. I'm not especially interested in the "cutting edge".
Thanks
bradavon said:
Really?
I thought the whole point was Stables were signed off?
Nightlies also updated daily which is bewildering. I just want a stable Android 5.1 release really. I'm not especially interested in the "cutting edge".
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The thing is: a rom may work perfectly for me and for you it gives various problems.
Bugs vary from device to device.
For instance, most roms I have tried on my device have worked perfectly (Thankfully).
But I saw other people who reported various issues with the same rom.
You will have to try for yourself.
the GPE rom by Danvdh is one of the most stable roms I have tried. It's still 5.0.1 though.
Resurrection Remix with Alucard kernel also works fine for me.
You might also try FlexOS. People say it has nice battery life.
AICP was also stable for me.
SaberMod CM12.1 stable too. But haven't tried it for some time.
They are all based on CM12.1.
You might also try the official CM12.1 Optimized build.
GDReaper said:
The thing is: a rom may work perfectly for me and for you it gives various problems.
Bugs vary from device to device.
For instance, most roms I have tried on my device have worked perfectly (Thankfully).
But I saw other people who reported various issues with the same rom. You will have to try for yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd rather stick with a stable ROM that's been signed off and had some quality control applied to it for that very reason. I prefer to just install a ROM and be done with it (maybe upgrading every now and again OTA) .
Like you say otherwise you could be fine (probably) or maybe not.
GDReaper said:
You might also try the official CM12.1 Optimized build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting idea. Is this much more optimised for the S4 than the regular CM12.1 nightlies?
Being a fork isn't there a chance it'll get out of sync with the CM12.1 nightlies?
Thanks for the info on the other ROMs.
Lennyz1988 said:
Nightlies are more stable then the snapshots. So don't let naming misguide you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could someone explain how this is the case please? Thanks.
bradavon said:
I'd rather stick with a stable ROM that's been signed off and had some quality control applied to it for that very reason. I prefer to just install a ROM and be done with it (maybe upgrading every now and again OTA) .
Like you say otherwise you could be fine (probably) or maybe not.
Interesting idea. Is this much more optimised for the S4 than the regular CM12.1 nightlies?
Being a fork isn't there a chance it'll get out of sync with the CM12.1 nightlies?
Thanks for the info on the other ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The optimized builds are developed by the same developer as the nightlies for the s4. So they pretty much go head to head.
Oh nice thanks.
Do the latest CM12.1 nightlies have the ability to turn the S4 legacy Menu button into an App-Switcher button? It's irritating having to hold down the Home button to switch between apps.
Lastly, is there anything major left in CM11 not in CM12.1 now? Is there a list somewhere?
I understand missing features is one of the reasons a CM12.1 Snapshot hasn't been released.
bradavon said:
Oh nice thanks.
Do the latest CM12.1 nightlies have the ability to turn the S4 legacy Menu button into an App-Switcher button? It's irritating having to hold down the Home button to switch between apps.
Lastly, is there anything major left in CM11 not in CM12.1 now? Is there a list somewhere?
I understand missing features is one of the reasons a CM12.1 Snapshot hasn't been released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seeing as android M is close development for CM12.1 will stop at some point and CM13 will start.
GDReaper said:
The thing is: a rom may work perfectly for me and for you it gives various problems.
Bugs vary from device to device.
For instance, most roms I have tried on my device have worked perfectly (Thankfully).
But I saw other people who reported various issues with the same rom.
You will have to try for yourself.
the GPE rom by Danvdh is one of the most stable roms I have tried. It's still 5.0.1 though.
Resurrection Remix with Alucard kernel also works fine for me.
You might also try FlexOS. People say it has nice battery life.
AICP was also stable for me.
SaberMod CM12.1 stable too. But haven't tried it for some time.
They are all based on CM12.1.
You might also try the official CM12.1 Optimized build.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 for the CM12.1 Optimized build. I had low mobile signal which resulting in big battery drain in the otherwise awesome Danvdh 5.0.1 GPE rom. Had to ditch it.
GDReaper said:
The optimized builds are developed by the same developer as the nightlies for the s4. So they pretty much go head to head.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for this.
Why are the optimized builds so far behind? The latest CM12.1 optimized build for the S4 looks to be 2015-06-16 but there's a regular CM12.1 nightly dated 2015-06-25.
Discussion and information about official cm14 nightlies.
Download latest nightly: get.cm/?device=bacon
Installation:
First time flashing CyanogenMod 14.1 on your device, or coming from another ROM?
Download the zip(s)
Install a compatible Recovery
Perform a nandroid backup of your current ROM (Optional)
Wipe data/factory reset
Flash CyanogenMod
Optional: Install the Google Apps addon package
Reboot​
Useful links
Latest twrp recovery: Download from here
Install twrp recovery: Official instructions
Gapps: Open Gapps
Jenkins: Build history of jenkins
(Check the build process)
Cyanogenmod code review: Gerrit review
Simple changelog: cmxlog
Device tree: Bacon cm14.1
Kernel tree: oneplus msm8974​
The odds are v might never get official cm14 .. but things might just change.,, All we gotta do is wait
vickeye said:
The odds are v might never get official cm14 .. but things might just change.,, All we gotta do is wait
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The test builds out there seem fairly good. So I think odds are with us
vickeye said:
The odds are v might never get official cm14 .. but things might just change.,, All we gotta do is wait
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Odds that we won't get a official? Why you claim this? There are phones older than Bacon that will be getting bacon.
the_rooter said:
Odds that we won't get a official? Why you claim this? There are phones older than Bacon that will be getting bacon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
May be I was wrong .. but if you look at the so called "801 and noughat drama " and there isn't a official branch for cm14 yet .. again I may be wrong .
vickeye said:
May be I was wrong .. but if you look at the so called "801 and noughat drama " and there isn't a official branch for cm14 yet .. again I may be wrong .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was related to not getting official COS i.e. Stock ROM won't get Nougat. CM nightlies will be available just have to be patient they don't need to go through CTS
the_rooter said:
Odds that we won't get a official? Why you claim this? There are phones older than Bacon that will be getting bacon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bacon in bacon? OPO inception.
I'm sure CM14 will come to OPO in an officially branched CM capacity, but probably not a stock OnePlus commissioned capacity. Does that make sense? I'm still thinking about bacon in bacon...
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon/tree/cm-14.0
cm14 branch for bacon? someone post it in official cm13 nightly thread.
varben said:
Can we discuss about cm14? What is achieved until now? How are the early unofficial ROMs? Will we have an official cm14?
Seems like cm14 branch is up: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon/tree/cm-14.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lets see.. i hope so
varben said:
Can we discuss about cm14? What is achieved until now? How are the early unofficial ROMs? Will we have an official cm14?
Seems like cm14 branch is up: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon/tree/cm-14.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So its a green light for bacon users waiting for official cm14 right?
Sent from my A0001 using XDA-Developers mobile app
vickeye said:
May be I was wrong .. but if you look at the so called "801 and noughat drama " and there isn't a official branch for cm14 yet .. again I may be wrong .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The oneplus x with the same chipset as baocn has had a cm14 branch for a while now so I doubt they'll leave us behind
gursimar said:
So its a green light for bacon users waiting for official cm14 right?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Personally I can't say. But is a small step towards a possible official cm14 (imho)
Maybe this thread wakes up soon, there is bacon cm14 commits
Well, let's analyze it a bit. Official 6.0 release: 05.10.2015. First official cm13 nightly build: 24.11.2015. So, cm release just 1.5 month after official Marshmallow release.
Nougat release date: 22.08.2016. Most likely, we won't get anything usable after 1.5 months. Now we have nothing (nothing official, even official cm14 sources are unusable currently).
I see no reasons to be optimistic. Progress is much slower this time.
giaur said:
Well, let's analyze it a bit. Official 6.0 release: 05.10.2015. First official cm13 nightly build: 24.11.2015. So, cm release just 1.5 month after official Marshmallow release.
Nougat release date: 22.08.2016. Most likely, we won't get anything usable after 1.5 months. Now we have nothing (nothing official, even official cm14 sources are unusable currently).
I see no reasons to be optimistic. Progress is much slower this time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is just the processor support missing, from what I read. Other commits will follow more easily.
And finally bacon commits on gerrit...
http://review.cyanogenmod.org/#/q/project:CyanogenMod/android_device_oneplus_bacon
giaur said:
Well, let's analyze it a bit. Official 6.0 release: 05.10.2015. First official cm13 nightly build: 24.11.2015. So, cm release just 1.5 month after official Marshmallow release.
Nougat release date: 22.08.2016. Most likely, we won't get anything usable after 1.5 months. Now we have nothing (nothing official, even official cm14 sources are unusable currently).
I see no reasons to be optimistic. Progress is much slower this time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed. It will probably be slower this time around since Cyanogen has let go of 20% of their workforce since CM13 was released.
Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Elius2676 said:
Agreed. It will probably be slower this time around since Cyanogen has let go of 20% of their workforce since CM13 was released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't see the connection here with cm14 and Cyanogen work force.
Cm doesn't depend on paid workforce.
varben said:
I don't see the connection here with cm14 and Cyanogen work force.
Cm doesn't depend on paid workforce.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I suggest you start doing your homework before speaking. Hint: go through the gerrit commits and look for people with "@cyngn.com" emails. maybe starting from Steve Kondik himself.
fmc000 said:
I suggest you start doing your homework before speaking. Hint: go through the gerrit commits and look for people with "@cyngn.com" emails. maybe starting from Steve Kondik himself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, I think I did mine. CyanogenMod and CyanogenOs (from where the workforce was "fired") is not the same. So, please Carry on! This discussion is not useful really. It is discussed to death already.