Hello guys.
After few days flashing and testing, here's a short performance report for few ROM benchmarks on my Samsung Galaxy Note 2. For performance testing is used Quadrant Standard Benchmark, as it's pretty quick. Results are sorted by overall performance, descending.
All tests were performed with no intensive/working background processes. Min - max values are several tests stock, if overclocking is not specified.
[wesam.othman ROM4.4.2][FN/E2/G3/G4/H2/I1/L1][070115]v7.0 Stock[Aroma+Fast+Stable] & Stable [email protected]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-2/development/wesam-othman-rom-4-4-2-v1-0-stock-t2824880
OVERALL: 11472 - 14440
CPU: 40338 - 50399
MEM: 4646 - 6016
I/O: 9630 - 12191
2D: 485 - 962
3D: 2262 - 2542
[WIP][4.4.4 TOUCHWIZ][ADVANCED NOTE 4 EXPERIENCE]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-2/development/port-4-4-4-tw-e210kktuknk3-t2968454
OVERALL: 10033
CPU: 36211
MEM: 4237
I/O: 7356
2D: 273
3D: 2087
[4.4.4] DN4 (Ditto Note 4) ROM by E-team (Electron Team)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2504016
OVERALL: 9159
CPU: 31206
MEM: 3757
I/O: 8106
2D: 321
3D: 2403
FNL1 [4.4.2][23-02-15]Diamond ROM V8.0 [Super Fast |Note 4 , S5 & Note 3
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...m-diamond-rom-v1-0-super-fast-note-4-t2883130
OVERALL: 8100 - 8666
CPU: 28050
MEM: 3324
I/O: 6835
2D: 236
3D: 2053
Saurorom_v5:
OVERALL: 7997
CPU: 30124
MEM: 3925
I/O: 3968
2D: 208
3D: 1759
CyanogenModX [5.1] :
OVERALL: 7438
CPU: 26039
MEM: 3538
I/O: 4937
2D: 214
3D: 2460
[5.1][LOLLIPOP][n7100]RESURRECTION REMIX 5.4.1[CM12.1]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/galaxy-note-2/development/rom-resurrection-remix-5-2-2-t2974539
OVERALL: 6615 - 6773
CPU: 24325
MEM: 3395
I/O: 2654
2D: 321
3D: 2379
Dirty Unicorns 4.4.4 {Toro} v8.2 [Final KitKat Version] (really good design IMO):
http://forum.xda-developers.com/gal...p/rom-dirty-unicorns-4-4-4-toro-v7-8-t2852829
OVERALL: 5786
CPU: 16208
MEM: 4070
I/O: 5863
2D: 485
3D: 2306
If you have just flashed another ROM and wish to share results, let's add it to the list.
DEVs, thank you for the hard work and sleepless nights!
Note 2 N7100 running DN4 debloated by me, and running AGNi 4.2.5 (stock clock 1.6 GHz, cpu and gpu undervolted).
OVERALL: 11405
CPU: 40029
MEM: 5082
I/O: 9196
2D: 327
3D: 2391
This is to show you how bloated Stock DN4 is. I can't imagine those ROMs at the bottom of the list.
Interesting comparison and it has some entertainment value as well. Has there ever been an Android ROM release thread where people don't swear that it's simultaneously the fastest, smoothest and most stable ROM evaaaaaaaaar????? I've used some truly flaky, laggy, crashing, broken ROMs on various devices and in every case there were people evangelising that this was the real experience.....lol. But benchmark apps don't succumb to bias and the numbers make for great comparisons. Of course what is missing is a comparison with stock Samsung TW on the same hardware. Currently I'm running a Note I (GT-N7000) but my newly purchased (but second hand) Note II (GT-N7105) is due for delivery tomorrow. I'll get it set up totally default with google account signed in and updated to whatever official version is newest and then install Quadrant and post the results for a comparison.
I ran Quadrant on my Note GT-N7105. I know it's not identical hardware but anyway...
This is stock rom, rooted, powersave disabled, device docked and charging. No overclocking or any other excitement.
With TouchWiz launcher:
OVERALL: 11221
CPU: 38751
MEM: 4526
I/O: 9439
2D: 971
3D: 2417
With Nova launcher:
OVERALL: 11553
CPU: 40165
MEM: 4380
I/O: 9851
2D: 962
3D: 2405
I ran the benchmarks a few times (after killing all apps and clearing RAM) and the results do vary, but not by a huge amount. The results above are just the last ones I did. Some others had better figures for certain benchmarks, worse for others, but nothing interesting or notable.
The one thing that strikes me is how bad 2D performance is in ROMs compared to stock Samsung firmwares. I also noticed this (but without any measurements or data) on my Note I (GT-N7000) where Firefox and Chrome scroll really smoothly in Samsung firmware but were always jerky and stuttery in every Rom I tried, both KitKat and LP.
julian67 said:
I've used some truly flaky, laggy, crashing, broken ROMs on various devices and in every case there were people evangelising that this was the real experience.....lol. But benchmark apps don't succumb to bias and the numbers make for great comparisons.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To be fair, you can compare my DN4 results with OP, there's a big difference in numbers between "Stock" DN4 and my personal installation after I took the time to debloat it. Sometimes it's not simply about people evangelising a ROM.
Related
Our phones cannot display more then ~56 fps due to vsync
Test settings: JM2, samset 1.8, mimocans ext4 fix + dalvik cache sent to nand, 8gb class 6 sd, all benchmarks were only run once.
Neocore:
200mhz : 36.8 fps
400mhz : 56 fps
800mhz : 56 fps
1000mhz : 56 fps
Yes, with our cpu reduced by 80% we still beat the nexus one and other froyo omapp/snapdragon cpu's in neocore.
Quadrant: (world & moon, the others are more difficult to test)
200mhz : 40fps : 410 Quadrant
400mhz : 56fps : 789 Quadrant
800mhz : 56fps : 1532 Quadrant
1000mhz: 56fps: 1762 Quadrant
Fps2d is 56 fps at all cpu settings.
-IMPORTANT-
Due to the nature of vsync we have no idea what fps we could be getting, Generally when you scale down cpu performance the bandwidth available for the gpu decreases dramatically as the processor cannot handle the new frames to keep up with the gpu. What this is showing us is that in neocore at 1000mhz we only require 20% of the cpu to get 36.8 fps and somewhere around 300mhz to get to the 56fps vsync cap. For all i know the gpu might only be able to output 70 fps without vsync at 1,000mhz, the question is by how much does reducing the cpu speed effect the available bandwidth to the gpu
This shows us:
1. Our gpu is largely held back by the frame-limit, the cpu also has an impact on the gpu performance.
2. We need better benchmarks to test only 3d performance, many of the 3d tests in quadrant are either heavy on the cpu, or are 2d tests. And neocore is simply not taxing enough on our gpu.
3. Need to find a way to remove vsync
4. Its a powerful beast! looking forward to froyo
Look foward to GLbenchmark 2.0
Even currently in 1.1 it's showing some impressive results, even though it's not supported very well on latest-gen gpu's (SGX530/535/540 mostly)
*off topic*
Would you please link / pm me to the Sd card you are using?
Its a Samsung 8gb class 6
would underclocking the cpu to 600mhz for example help increase battery performance, or it it mostly the screen that drains the battery?
its mostly the screen
But really really great research there !
Its nice to know.. Hehe..
The next thing i would like too see is quadrant tests where the SGS has undergone the Lagfix and then with different SD cards
I don't know are these numbers good for Tegra 2 dual-core CPU.
1st run: 2402
2nd run: 2542
3rd run: 2517
All I know is it runs smooth with Angry Birds (no hiccup at all!).
mingkee said:
I don't know are these numbers good for Tegra 2 dual-core CPU.
1st run: 2402
2nd run: 2542
3rd run: 2517
All I know is it runs smooth with Angry Birds (no hiccup at all!).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm adding results in my benchmark-matrix from russian biggest forum 4pda
and can tell that 2400+ is great result.
Viewsonic G Tablet at old firmware showed 1855 (it has Tegra2 too)
MyTouch 4G got 1916 in my tests (not overclocked)
https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0Ah1ImnrR7y7NdHN2clZJMWtRNTJZa3NrY1VEdmRqdkE&gid=0
I'm getting between 2400 & 2500 with Quadrant which I don't think has been optimized for the tegra2 yet, as Quadrant only reports one core at this time.
Got these results while running Dexter's 1.0c & 1.1. The updates have not improved the speed.
2400-2550 consistently. This hasn't changed with either firmware update or with the 1.1 ROM.
As a reference, my 1250Mhz overclocked original Droid scores around 1400-1500.
My Quadrant Advanced results
Total: 2402
CPU: 7264
Memory: 2632
I/O: 938
2D: 321
3D: 855
Quadrant Advanced results
total 2144
w/Dexter 1.2 rom
Originally Posted by mingkee
I don't know are these numbers good for Tegra 2 dual-core CPU.
1st run: 2402
2nd run: 2542
3rd run: 2517
All I know is it runs smooth with Angry Birds (no hiccup at all!).
I'm adding results in my benchmark-matrix from russian biggest forum 4pda
and can tell that 2400+ is great result.
Viewsonic G Tablet at old firmware showed 1855 (it has Tegra2 too)
MyTouch 4G got 1916 in my tests (not overclocked)
https://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?...EdmRqdkE&gid=0
__________________
Download Software
Got today. Impressive!
Total: 2611
CPU: 8038
Memory: 2680
I/O: 1140
2D: 334
3D: 865
Gonna change signature)
1st run: 2216
2nd run: 2379
3rd run: 2485
Running Dexter Mod 1.2. Don't know the firmare version. It states2.2.
1st run: 2178
2nd run: 2265
3rd run: 2432
In comparison my Droid 2 Global gets lower 1500s
I get 36.656 MFLOPS in Linpack
74.5fps in Neocore
2184 in Quadrant (after running the other two)
Hey Guys,
what about having a thread, dedicated to Benchmarks, Performance Settings, Firmware, Tweaks and other Drugs you are on
So here is what I'm using:
RAZR HD - XT925
- Stock ROM
- Unlocked BL
- Rooted
- Android Tweaker -> Autotweak
Quadrant Score:
- 5032
CPU: 9789
Memory: 8727
I/O: 3439
2D: 1000
3D: 2206
Antutu Benchmark:
-10344
CPU Integer: 1536
CPU Float: 2260
2D: 1087
3D: 2801
Database I/O: 555
SD-Card write: 149
SD-Card read: 191
AnTuTu 3dRating:
3d Score 2899
Off-Screen: 820
Feel free to post your Settings and Benchmarkresults
Greetz Esok
Anyone wanna help donate some performance metrics for different models? So we can have an overview of average performance differences between models.
Benchmarks:
Geekbench - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.primatelabs.geekbench
AnTuTu - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.antutu.ABenchMark&hl=en
Futuremark - https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.futuremark.dmandroid.application&hl=en
SunSpider - https://www.webkit.org/perf/sunspider/sunspider.html
Please tell us what version you have (4GB/2GB, Z3580/Z3560) so I can catalog averages for each model.
average results per model
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML - 4GB RAM/Intel Z3580 - 1080p
AnTuTu average 47381 - top 48981 - results: 2
GeekBench average MC:2955 SC:912 - top MC:3013 SC:919 - results: 2
SunSpider average 698.4ms +/- 5.4% - top 698.4ms +/- 5.4% - results: 1
3DMark Icestorm average 19796 - top 19796 - results: 1
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE551ML - 2GB RAM/Intel Z3560 - 1080p
AnTuTu average 41859 - top 42046 - results: 2
GeekBench average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
SunSpider average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
3DMark Icestorm average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
Asus ZenFone 2 ZE550ML - 2GB RAM/Intel Z3560 - 720p
AnTuTu average 43581 - top 43581 - results: N/A
GeekBench average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
SunSpider average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
3DMark Icestorm average N/A - top N/A - results: N/A
Bought from gearbest.com China version 4GB RAM, 1.8GHz processor, 32GB storage. AnTuTu 41672. For comparison my Note 3 running CM11 Latest Snapshot build got AnTuTu 42212.
ZE550ML 5.5" 720P 16GB 2GB
Very happy with this benchmark. Also scored over 18000 on 3Dmark Ice Storm
Mine got 42046 antutu on 1.8ghz/2GB version [emoji1]
Bechmarks? Meh!!
Are benchmarks really a point of concern? I mean come on, ZenFone 2 is a flagship of Asus, it's gotta be a one hell of a device.
It surely beats its competitors with the performance.
Cheers!
mihir2035 said:
Are benchmarks really a point of concern? I mean come on, ZenFone 2 is a flagship of Asus, it's gotta be a one hell of a device.
It surely beats its competitors with the performance.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, we all known, benchmark is just for fun with zenfone 2 [emoji1]
Hey there, here are my benchmarks.
I've got the 2.3ghz atom with 4gb of ram and 1080p display 32gb storage
antutu
45781
3dmark Ice Storm Unlimited
19796
3dmark Ice Storm Extreme
MAXED OUT (10294)
Geekbench
single core
905
multi core
2897
Sunspider (chrome)
698.4ms +/- 5.4%
mihir2035 said:
Are benchmarks really a point of concern? I mean come on, ZenFone 2 is a flagship of Asus, it's gotta be a one hell of a device.
It surely beats its competitors with the performance.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes they are, especially due to all the different variations.
It's a good way to see if paying an extra 50 per model step is worth the performance bump or not.
Also thanks everyone for submitting scores!
I guess its pretty accurate score
Here's mine in Antutu.
Im using the 2.3GHz, 4GB Ram, 32GB ROM.
Got this score once.
And average of 43-44k.
Sent from my ASUS_Z00AD using xda premium
Antutu 47k
Thanks for the new submissions, I'll add them to the results as soon as I'm home
Hello, on 1,8ghz/2go ram - 720p
62328
Cm13
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using Tapatalk
Looks like CM13 isn't fully optimized..
I get around 65k antutu points on stock rom.
kenbo111 said:
Cm13
Sent from my ASUS_Z00A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
2gb or 4gb?
Stock rom deodex, root, deleted bloat, boret24's kernel, stock daily settings
65k
http://shrani.najdi.si/?46/10A/2kH18SQn/screenshot2016-04-25-21-.jpg
http://shrani.najdi.si/?3h/jG/3wmAKXhK/screenshot2016-04-25-21-.jpg
Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.
How did u get over 47k in antutu?
Geekbench isn't really a good source at the moment. It is limited to 32-bit, so it can't utilize the full potential of the SoC.
They need to release a 64-bit compliant version to really be able to run the tests correctly.
elkay said:
Here are my benchmarks for the North America 2.3/64 model:
3DMark: 20458
Quadrant: 23146
Antutu: 47777
Vellamo HTML5: 3718
Vellamo Metal: 1395
Linpack: 510.053
Geekbench single: 913
Geekbench multi: 2868
NenaMark 2: 59.7
GFXBench 3.1 T-Rex: 1674
GFXBench Manhattan: 775
Basemark X: 19438
Basemark OS II: 1224
http://postimg.org/gallery/2cxh8x5p2/dc3078d8/
And yes, T-Mo sucks here lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not BM mine yet but based on those numbers.... WOW!!!!
I am also considering the price of the phone vs the scores when I say that.
The S6 comes in at nearly 68k on Antutu but the 48k score still puts this phone in the current top 10.
ze551ml antutu test :
Also...
Antutu: 48475