Pure AOSP 5.0.2? - Nexus 4 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

Did somebody compile a AOSP 5.0.2 rom without any additions and wants to share it here? Or has the time to compile it and share it here?

edisso10018 said:
Did somebody compile a AOSP 5.0.2 rom without any additions and wants to share it here? Or has the time to compile it and share it here?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can find some pretty minimalistic AOSP ROMs out there, for example:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/development/rom-simpleaosp-t2932090
Few changes, nothing major or noticeable.
If you want pure AOSP, it's pretty fun to compile it yourself!

ATM I'm using that. But I want the pure version for some reason. And I have no time to setup a building environment.

Is there really no pure AOSP build for mako? I can't believe it.

edisso10018 said:
Is there really no pure AOSP build for mako? I can't believe it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's one here http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/development/rom-pure-stock-lrx22c-t2982897, but it's only 5.0.1.

Building one right now with the memory leak patches, but it can take quite a while until the build and upload has finished...
EDIT: Sorry it took that long, removing ccache was not that intelligent ^^
It is pure 5.0.2 with two cherry-picks to fix the memory leak:
https://github.com/Lethargy/android_frameworks_base/commit/da2133d046e59b590e51448eda31d710da217d40
https://github.com/Lethargy/android_frameworks_base/commit/e30ccdbeac2c53b04a389c7ffd8e9d500c93ef30
Download link: Recovery ZIP, Fastboot flashable images

Wow, danke! Werd's nachher direkt mal ausprobieren!
Update:
Does not install. "There's an error in updater binary" and some other errors...

The AOSP update scripts don't work if system is already mounted, I think. If it didn't work with an unmounted system, you could try the fastboot images I've added to the post above.

Okay, I'll try both variants.

After unmounting system before the installation everything installed without problems. ROM works flawless too.
DANKE!!!!

Related

LG uploaded V500 kitkat kernel source today!

https://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensourceList?types=ALL&search=lgv500
Is where you can get it (start your downloading now...)
the strange thing is they appear to have two uploads for kitkat...
Sent from my LG-V500 using XDA Premium HD app
Yay! What does it mean for the simple user? Better roms?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
All I really want is gamma correction and maybe overclocking and U/V.
This means that anyone interested in building a replacement kernel for the LG stock 4.4.2 release has a blueprint to start from. I know of two kernels that have been released for 4.2.2 stock, this release means that we may see updates of these projects to 4.4.2.
I may try and restart my own efforts in this area as well depending upon time and what kind of problems I find in the 4.4.2 US release.
M
muiriddin said:
This means that anyone interested in building a replacement kernel for the LG stock 4.4.2 release has a blueprint to start from. I know of two kernels that have been released for 4.2.2 stock, this release means that we may see updates of these projects to 4.4.2.
I may try and restart my own efforts in this area as well depending upon time and what kind of problems I find in the 4.4.2 US release.
M
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The first and most obvious is the gamma set at 2.05 roughly. If you set it to 2.2 - 2.3, that would already be a big plus.
The source uploaded by LG didn't include the kernel source so I contacted their open source division and they've now uploaded a proper kernel source. I'm travelling for work now, but will take a look at it when I get back home next week and get something compiled.
G Pad(V500)_Android_KitKat_LGV500_v20b_Kernel
https://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensourceList?types=ALL&search=v500
Sent from my LG-V500 using Tapatalk
id10terror said:
The source uploaded by LG didn't include the kernel source so I contacted their open source division and they've now uploaded a proper kernel source. I'm travelling for work now, but will take a look at it when I get back home next week and get something compiled.
G Pad(V500)_Android_KitKat_LGV500_v20b_Kernel
https://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensourceList?types=ALL&search=v500
Sent from my LG-V500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to hear that someone else contacted them as well. I have been impressed with their open source group responding as quickly as they did. They definitely respond better than several other companies when facing these requests!
:good::good: I would pay anybody to incorporate or activate the OTG+Charging in this Kernel. :good::good: :fingers-crossed:
id10terror said:
The source uploaded by LG didn't include the kernel source so I contacted their open source division and they've now uploaded a proper kernel source. I'm travelling for work now, but will take a look at it when I get back home next week and get something compiled.
G Pad(V500)_Android_KitKat_LGV500_v20b_Kernel
https://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensourceList?types=ALL&search=v500
Sent from my LG-V500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When if get the chance can you compare the 18a kernel to the 20b one? I like the settings the 18a kernel, the lower brightness levels are setup in a way that makes it great for night time. I have the 18a kernel running on the 20b build but after the screen is locked it and turned back on it changes to levels of the 20b kernel, but retains the gamma level. I could attach a flashable zip with the 18a kernel if you need it.
LBJM said:
When if get the chance can you compare the 18a kernel to the 20b one? I like the settings the 18a kernel, the lower brightness levels are setup in a way that makes it great for night time. I have the 18a kernel running on the 20b build but after the screen is locked it and turned back on it changes to levels of the 20b kernel, but retains the gamma level. I could attach a flashable zip with the 18a kernel if you need it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi, I am quite a newbie. Just wondering what is the use of the kernels? Can we just flash it on custom roms like the kitkats ones done by _infected. AOKP or the Cynogenmod for the GPAD? The AOKP and the Cynogen are smooth but few features like Autorotate doesn't work and there is no gamma correction i think
I compiled a kernel using the source provided by LG, but for some reason, it doesn't boot.
I keep getting this error:
Code:
Secure booting error
Cause: boot certification verify
I noticed that the resulting "boot.emmc.win" is a lot smaller than the original boot.emmc.win (~10 MB compared to 24MB)
Another interesting thing is that if I uncompress the original 24 MB boot.emmc.win using the command "unmkbootimg -i boot.emmc.win", I get two files: kernel (7.5 MB) and ramdisk.cpio.gz (2.6 MB). If I rebuild the boot.emmc.win using these exact two files, I get an 11MB boot.emmc.win, but this one DOES boot.
It probably has something to do with the locked bootloader and the loki exploit.
Can anyone help me get to the bottom of this? I really want to solve the gamma issue.
Well, as I suspected, it was because of the locked bootloader, but using the loki_tool, I was able to bypass the bootloader check.
So I now have a working, self-compiled 4.4.2 kernel (using the eabi-4.7) , based on LG's kernel source.
Unfortunatelly, gamma is still the same (about 2 - 2.1). Need to figure out how to modify it.
If someone can and wants to help, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Can you look at the 18 Rom kernel and see what has changed?
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
ruxandy said:
Well, as I suspected, it was because of the locked bootloader, but using the loki_tool, I was able to bypass the bootloader check.
So I now have a working, self-compiled 4.4.2 kernel (using the eabi-4.7) , based on LG's kernel source.
Unfortunatelly, gamma is still the same (about 2 - 2.1). Need to figure out how to modify it.
If someone can and wants to help, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Canadoc said:
Can you look at the 18 Rom kernel and see what has changed?
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Panel is very close to correct gamma when using default linear qlut, instead of MSM_MIPI_LGIT_VIDEO_WUXGA_PT_PANEL qlut.
I would definitely take a look at the 50018A kernel if someone can provide the source. I wasn't able to find it.
gin_silver said:
Hi, I am quite a newbie. Just wondering what is the use of the kernels? Can we just flash it on custom roms like the kitkats ones done by _infected. AOKP or the Cynogenmod for the GPAD? The AOKP and the Cynogen are smooth but few features like Autorotate doesn't work and there is no gamma correction i think
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel is what drives the Rom. Without the kernel sources improvements to a device are hard to make. It's AOSP ( Android Open Source Project) not AOKP.
LBJM said:
The kernel is what drives the Rom. Without the kernel sources improvements to a device are hard to make. It's AOSP ( Android Open Source Project) not AOKP.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Hopefully we will have some great modified kernels for the kitkat version
Btw i was referring to AOKP (K for Kang) in this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2710996
gin_silver said:
Thanks. Hopefully we will have some great modified kernels for the kitkat version
Btw i was referring to AOKP (K for Kang) in this thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2710996
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know.
20d source released
I do not know if anyone will find this of use, but they have now posted the 20d kernel source (and some other stuff).
https://www.lg.com/global/support/opensource/opensourceList?types=ALL&search=v500
ruxandy said:
Well, as I suspected, it was because of the locked bootloader, but using the loki_tool, I was able to bypass the bootloader check.
So I now have a working, self-compiled 4.4.2 kernel (using the eabi-4.7) , based on LG's kernel source.
Unfortunatelly, gamma is still the same (about 2 - 2.1). Need to figure out how to modify it.
If someone can and wants to help, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello ruxandy,
Can you explain in few words how did you manage to push the kernel to your v500?
Here is my story:
I downloaded the V500 Lollipop kernel because I wanted to compile .ko loadable modules and drivers to support RTL2832U DVB USB dongle. I successfully compiled those modules, rooted the tabled and tried to insmod them. But it failed because the modules did not find some kernel APIs.
Then I decided to build the kernel with built-in those drivers and I did it successfully, the problem now is what to do with zImage. I read there are two roads the one building own KDZ file seems very complicated and not sure if really possible. The other seems to be to extract the boot.emmc.win file using TWRP. So I downgraded the V500 bootloader from LT to KK and installed TWRT using this http://forum.xda-developers.com/lg-g-pad-83/help/v500-how-to-install-twrp-stock-lp-t3165846 but after reboot got the secure boot error you did.
So again - how to use self built zImage and is this possible for KitKat only, since installing TWRP with Lollipop does not seem possible so far?

[LOLLIPOP] Xperia AOSP Project

hi all
we have included this device in open devices project
you can check news about project on
http://developer.sonymobile.com/knowledge-base/open-source/open-devices/
feel free to fork, build, fix and push back
Br
J
great lets try to build this
EDIT: somehow my ubuntu wont boot "missing operating system" is some one else able to build it?
rikgroen1995 said:
great lets try to build this
EDIT: somehow my ubuntu wont boot "missing operating system" is some one else able to build it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
No luck here either.
I went to the link provided in the OP.
Clicked on "List of devices and resources".
On the new page I clicked on "Check out the AOSP for XPeria Z2 tablet project on Github".
Created the "local_manifests" folder and file within as said on the new page.
THEN it says "Download the zip file with vendor binaries from: http://developer.sonymobile.com/knowledge-base/open-source/android-open-source-project-for-xperia-devices/"...
And that's where the problem is : that page is not available...
So we're obviously missing some resources to be able to build at least if we'd like to build KK...
And I know KK is now an old and outdated thing of the far past.
But I happen to use XPosed. And that does not work on LOL.
If I can't customise to my needs, then I can stick to stock and debloat to my liking.
Regards.
NexusPenguin said:
Hi,
No luck here either.
I went to the link provided in the OP.
Clicked on "List of devices and resources".
On the new page I clicked on "Check out the AOSP for XPeria Z2 tablet project on Github".
Created the "local_manifests" folder and file within as said on the new page.
THEN it says "Download the zip file with vendor binaries from: http://developer.sonymobile.com/knowledge-base/open-source/android-open-source-project-for-xperia-devices/"...
And that's where the problem is : that page is not available...
So we're obviously missing some resources to be able to build at least if we'd like to build KK...
And I know KK is now an old and outdated thing of the far past.
But I happen to use XPosed. And that does not work on LOL.
If I can't customise to my needs, then I can stick to stock and debloat to my liking.
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this what you are looking for?
http://developer.sonymobile.com/downloads/tool/software-binaries-for-aosp-lollipop-android-5-0/
Greetz
TimHermans said:
Is this what you are looking for?
http://developer.sonymobile.com/downloads/tool/software-binaries-for-aosp-lollipop-android-5-0/
Greetz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Tim,
Thanks for your answer.
That's the link to the LOL binaries.
As I said in my post, I am looking for the KK binaries because XPosed does not work (for now ? but for how long ?) on LOL...
Anyways, even with the binaries provided (LOL or KK for Z2 Phone, not Tablet) I am unable to build.
As soon as I fire the build, I immediately get an error "The make file you're using is version 4.1. Build requires make file version 3.81 or 3.82".
So the "make" file is too recent and Sony did not care to update it's sources...
I really am wondering why Sony makes such an effort to provide a "beginner's friendly guide to build AOSP for Xperia" if the whole thing is then obviously aimed only at developers that can help themselves out of those problems.
Regards.
updated guide and blobs for android Lollypop version 5.0.1
http://developer.sonymobile.com/knowledge-base/open-source/open-devices/
jerpelea said:
updated guide and blobs for android Lollypop version 5.0.1
http://developer.sonymobile.com/knowledge-base/open-source/open-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Cool... but WTF doesn't Sony also release the needed binaries to build an AOSP but KK version ?
I would like to build KK because I would then like to customise to my own needs without having to install a Custom ROM and for that I would like to use XPosed.
But Xposed does not seem to support LOL for now...
So a KK binary would be much appreciated... at least on my side !
Regards.
AOSP 5.0.2 is published
http://developer.sonymobile.com/kno...ld-aosp-lollipop-for-unlocked-xperia-devices/
jerpelea said:
AOSP 5.0.2 is published
http://developer.sonymobile.com/kno...ld-aosp-lollipop-for-unlocked-xperia-devices/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@jerpelea
Why is the Z2 Tablet Wifi (castor_windy - SGP511/SGP512) not supported?
Also, is there an AOSP 4.4.x too?.
MiyagiSan said:
[
Why is the Z2 Tablet Wifi (castor_windy - SGP511/SGP512) not supported?
Also, is there an AOSP 4.4.x too?.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it is supported look on aosp m thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/xpe.../aosp-6-0-marshmallow-sony-xperia-z2-t3235935
These builds are based on sonys aosp release
4.4.x is not builded yet but should work too
rcstar6696 said:
it is supported look on aosp m thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/xpe.../aosp-6-0-marshmallow-sony-xperia-z2-t3235935
These builds are based on sonys aosp release
4.4.x is not builded yet but should work too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply and link.
I was looking for castor_windy support for Sony AOSP KitKat 4.4.x (or failing that, Lollipop 5.1.x) for now. I haven't even looked at Marshmallow yet and don't have time to do so for now so, still to determine if Marshmallow meets my needs...

Kernels for One M8 AOSP Roms Discussion

So this thread is for all kernels available for the HTC One M8 that are for AOSP Roms. I will list ALL that I know in the OP, categorized. Discuss what's your setup, speed, smoothness, stability, battery etc.
Here is a List of what each CPU Govenor Does in Custom Kernels:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/general/general/ref-to-date-guide-cpu-governors-o-t3048957 or http://androidmodguide.blogspot.co.uk/p/blog-page.html?m=1
KITKAT:
1. Liquidkernel Thanks to Team Liquid [11-11-2014] Download
2. Excalibur Thanks to Xboxfanj [12-03-2014] Download
3. Blackbird Thanks to Damacy [12-17-2014] Download
3. Furnace Thanks to Savoca [11-18-2014] Download
LOLLIPOP:
1. Elite Thanks to Buckmarble [03-05-2015] Download
2. Blackbird Thanks to Damacy [06-01-2015] Download
3. Furnace Thanks to Savoca [06-23-2015] Download
4. Blissful Thanks to Team Bliss [07-06-2015] Download
5. Candy Thanks to Team Candy [07-26-2015] Download
6. UnicornBlood Thanks to Team Dirty Unicorns [06-29-2015] Download
7. Slim Thanks to Team Slim [06-22-2015] Download
Thanks to all the Developers that support our One M8 with all these custom kernels, this is all their work. Thanks to gsstudios for the CPU Govenor Detail List.
I'm currently using CM12.1 Nightly 20150707 with Candy Kernel 07/05, it did break root but flashing SuperSU zip did get root again. Prior to Candy kernel I tried Blissful 07/06 and it did seem a little bit smoother & didn't break root. Do you guys notice a difference in smoothness from Candy & Blissful Kernel?
krazie1 said:
I'm currently using CM12.1 Nightly 20150707 with Candy Kernel 07/05, it did break root but flashing SuperSU zip did get root again. Prior to Candy kernel I tried Blissful 07/06 and it did seem a little bit smoother & didn't break root. Do you guys notice a difference in smoothness from Candy & Blissful Kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you just pulling the boot.img from the respective ROMs and flashing it to get the kernels?
Sent from my One M8 using Tapatalk
Bubbadogg14 said:
Are you just pulling the boot.img from the respective ROMs and flashing it to get the kernels?
Sent from my One M8 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes thats what i'm doing, putting boot.img in a empty flashable zip for unicornblood & replacing the boot.img in the blissful/candy kernel zips.
You can also just copy the boot.img (rename to whatever kernel it is) to the internal storage and flash with TWRP or Flashify.
Has anyone here had the problem where certain kernels will not boot but just go straight to hboot. The problem seems random and it drives me nuts! My favorite rom, built by a good friend of mine, is CyanideL but the Dev does not have the m8 and can't figure out why it happens for some and not others even on the same fw and carrier... Any insight would be greatly appreciated
Do you think you could upload the kernels to a server...I've seen ways of organizing kernels in other threads,and this is just what we need...Kudos for you krazie,good idea...
Sent from my One M8 using Tapatalk
razen_kain said:
Has anyone here had the problem where certain kernels will not boot but just go straight to hboot. The problem seems random and it drives me nuts! My favorite rom, built by a good friend of mine, is CyanideL but the Dev does not have the m8 and can't figure out why it happens for some and not others even on the same fw and carrier... Any insight would be greatly appreciated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've had that issue on SOKP and CyanideL. The weird thing is if I convert my Dev Edition to a GPE Edition it boots normally but if I try to install the same ROMs on the Dev Edition without converting it it just boots to bootloader
Added Download links to some kernels
Broodn said:
I've had that issue on SOKP and CyanideL. The weird thing is if I convert my Dev Edition to a GPE Edition it boots normally but if I try to install the same ROMs on the Dev Edition without converting it it just boots to bootloader
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm... I am using Dev edition fw... Than you!
I would try to credit some of the guys who've made the kernels....I somehow feel as someone else would oppose the thread if you didnt....Obviously, you are just linking people to kernel downloads...I completely agree with what you did though because sometimes finding the exact kernel that everyone is talking about through hundreds of pages is usually difficult (especially for someone who doesnt follow each and every thread)....Just an idea, Krazie.....Im pretty sure the dev's of those kernel's dont mind though
I'm having some problems with candy kernel running the latest AICP. Sometimes my Verizon One m8 will randomly reboot into hboot. When I try to retsart my phone from there, it will keep rebooting into hboot, but after the 3rd try it will reboot normally. Is anyone else having this issue?
Alright, I'm in. Giving Blissful and CM 12.1 a shot. Will report back in a bit.
StarfishP said:
I'm having some problems with candy kernel running the latest AICP. Sometimes my Verizon One m8 will randomly reboot into hboot. When I try to retsart my phone from there, it will keep rebooting into hboot, but after the 3rd try it will reboot normally. Is anyone else having this issue?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I had the same issue before with that combo, have you tried blissful or blackbird with AICP?
Alright, Damacy posted a new Blackbird boot.img and CM REALLY doesn't like it. Blissful seems to be doing okay, I like that it has faux's junk all up in it's trunk. Did Blissful come from Blisspop?
munkyvirus said:
Alright, Damacy posted a new Blackbird boot.img and CM REALLY doesn't like it. Blissful seems to be doing okay, I like that it has faux's junk all up in it's trunk. Did Blissful come from Blisspop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it did
krazie1 said:
Yes it did
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting, way more features then CM's kernel.
For all: it isn't uncommon on lollipop for separately flashed kernels to not play well with roms because of some discrepancies with the ramdisk (perhaps dtb as well, though I can't remember everything I read on it). That being said, the issues can be remedied by building whichever rom and kernel combo you'd like together (or using a rom that already has your desired kernel built in tandem). I know its not an average users fix but it works. This is the reason that Damacy has only been releasing "UNSUPPORTED" builds
No mention of the elementx kernel?
Alec2435 said:
No mention of the elementx kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ElementalX only works on sense and GPE I don't think they have a AOSP kernel
Broodn said:
ElementalX only works on sense and GPE I don't think they have a AOSP kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not for the m8 but I sure wish they did. Kernel issues with this phone and aosp is a nightmare... I'm beginning to lose hope. No one except fizbanrapper is really doing anything kernel related for m8/aosp. I think all the devs are jumping off this flagship...?

[ROM] [DISCUSSION] Official Mokee Rom Releases [6.0.1] [GT-I9100]

First I want to say I didn't build this rom, or have anything to do with Mokee Open Source. Any bug reports or feature requests should be directed to Mokee developers.
I only started this thread to provide a link to the roms, as they are not available on xda until now, and a lot of users may not be aware they are still around.
Personally I have found this rom to be very stable, with some nice features.
Links:
Mokee Official Site
Mokee on Google+
Changelog
Bug Tracker
Official Rom Releases
http://download.mokeedev.com/?device=i9100
Recommended Gapps
Open Gapps
Warning(particularly for MM builds): If you try to flash gapps, you will probably find it won't fit on the stock /system partition. In this case you will need to repatition - Repartitioning guide.
Make sure you choose a pit file that increases /system and not just /data(eg, I91001GB_4GB.pit)
Alternatively use Lanchon's re-pitting tool if you want to avoid losing your data
If you want to donate to Mokee and make their life a bit easier(donations will go towards bandwidth etc),
you can donate HERE
Instructions
1. Wipe data/factory reset(from KK compatible recovery)
2. Format /system
3. Flash rom
4. Flash gapps(optional)
5. Flash isorec recovery(for MM, see below), you only need to do this once
6. Reboot
Credits
- Mokee Developers
- CyanogenMod
- AOSP
- SlimRoms
- OmniRoms
Note: Now that Marshmallow(6.x.x) has been released, a warning for anyone flashing these latest nightlies. The kernel(isorec CM kernel) comes bundled with CM recovery, which is more or less useless. If you want a working recovery, you will need to flash the rom, followed by gapps(if you want play store), followed by an isorec recovery from HERE
Be sure to flash either CWM or TWRP for i9100. It is obvious from the name of the file.
And read about Isorec if you are not sure.
Thank you to @Troubadour666 for the Youtube review
Thank you @noppy22 for starting this thread. I had been downloading the ROM from G+ but the added benefit of a thread here on xda means that you have fellow S2 users to discuss problems etc with. Thank you again mate.
downloading....
thx for share
Thank you for the rom....downloading :good:
@noppy22 Have you run Mokee using Lanchons iso-Rec kernel and arnabs Twrp recovery? If so, how did it run?
Drhedphuk said:
@noppy22 Have you run Mokee using Lanchons iso-Rec kernel and arnabs Twrp recovery? If so, how did it run?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mokee has already got my twrp recovery as I supplied it to them back in june 2015
@arnab Thank you.
Drhedphuk said:
@noppy22 Have you run Mokee using Lanchons iso-Rec kernel and arnabs Twrp recovery? If so, how did it run?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've only run it with stock kernel. The only thing I changed(with Kernel Audiutor) was i/o scheduler to row. I suspect any cm12.1 compatible kernel will work. I might give one of Lanchons trim kernels a go in the next day or so
Edit: I tried the last trim/twrp kernel and got bootloop on 160102 build....
noppy22 said:
I've only run it with stock kernel. The only thing I changed(with Kernel Audiutor) was i/o scheduler to row. I suspect any cm12.1 compatible kernel will work. I might give one of Lanchons trim kernels a go in the next day or so
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi mate, I tried Lanchons isoRec kernel when flashing and it bootlooped. Xposed failed to flash for me too.
Thanks for getting back to me.
Drhedphuk said:
Hi mate, I tried Lanchons isoRec kernel when flashing and it bootlooped. Xposed failed to flash for me too.
Thanks for getting back to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just edited my post, lol. Not sure whether maybe an AOSP kernel like DragonKernel might work, I'll upgrade tomorrow and give it a go...
Hi,
in one pass, rom + open pico gapps + xpose v79 sdk22 flashed ok
Troubadour666 said:
Hi,
in one pass, rom + open pico gapps + xpose v79 sdk22 flashed ok
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xpose will not flash for me.
OK, I tried the latest build(12/01) with DragonKernel(30/11), and got to optimizing apps, then bootloop. So, stock kernel seems the only option for now...
noppy22 said:
OK, I tried the latest build(12/01) with DragonKernel(30/11), and got to optimizing apps, then bootloop. So, stock kernel seems the only option for now...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You tried "ripping-out" arnab's kernel from his latest DU and put it over this ROM?
:good:
souler456 said:
You tried "ripping-out" arnab's kernel from his latest DU and put it over this ROM?
:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, no. The reports of freezing with his last release stopped me from trying that. BTW the GeneSys kernel(.tar) that was released is the same as the kernel in DU 9.8, but for me the DragonKernel I tried is the last "AOSP" kernel I found to be stable
Thanks for share... What features has this rom? On official Web site can't found anything about features?
I9100 Tapatalk, RR 5.1.1 Lollipop
089man said:
Thanks for share... What features has this rom? On official Web site can't found anything about features?
I9100 Tapatalk, RR 5.1.1 Lollipop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's basically Cyanogen 12.1 with a couple of extra features like wakelock blocker. My own opinion, I think it is a lot smoother than stock Cyanogen.
To correct my earlier post. I reflashed the Rom and flashed xposed during the flash process and it flashed without any problems.
089man said:
Thanks for share... What features has this rom? On official Web site can't found anything about features?
I9100 Tapatalk, RR 5.1.1 Lollipop
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I added some screenshots in the OP. Hope this gives you an idea of features....
noppy22 said:
I just edited my post, lol. Not sure whether maybe an AOSP kernel like DragonKernel might work, I'll upgrade tomorrow and give it a go...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great ROM! I repartitioned my phone using 1/4G pit and this ROM works very nice. Thanks devs!
Xposed may not be installed in MoKee RELEASE version cuz they said they odexed the ROM.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using XDA Free mobile app

Neptune Pine - Custom Rom Infomation and Testing

I'm looking at the Neptune pine to see what I can do with it.
so far I have obtained the kernel config
Configkernel3.4
This Thread is for sharing information and Q/A
My goal is to have a custom android rom compiled and then to try port different O/S's to it.
Nice! What's the status of your efforts?
How to the testing .....
JustSueMe said:
I'm looking at the Neptune pine to see what I can do with it.
so far I have obtained the kernel config
Configkernel3.4
This Thread is for sharing information and Q/A
My goal is to have a custom android rom compiled and then to try port different O/S's to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What about using the kernel source from cyanogenmod, like the dev did who released beta cyanogenmod?
F0L said:
What about using the kernel source from cyanogenmod, like the dev did who released beta cyanogenmod?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok, should have read it better. Are you able to just compile a kernel for testing. Once you have a working one, that would be a good base for updating rom.
JustSueMe said:
I'm looking at the Neptune pine to see what I can do with it.
so far I have obtained the kernel config
Configkernel3.4
This Thread is for sharing information and Q/A
My goal is to have a custom android rom compiled and then to try port different O/S's to it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any update on this?
Guess this is not going to happen. Just wish I still had the time I used to. I would have had a go my self, as the vanilla kernel is what kills this cool bit of kit.
I managed to get it to a usable state with google play installed, by installing SkyNET. Which tweaks the system on the fly when needed. Helps keep as much memory as possible.
Would the kernel source of the Nokia X help? as it uses the exact same hardware.
I have it downloaded, so if it will help, I can link.
I have given up on anyone doing anything with pine. So I tweaked stock rom as much as I could, got it running very nicely even with my 130GB storage (link2sd). I also modified the ramdisk image to support init.d on boot. Im also using kickarse kernel script.
F0L said:
I have given up on anyone doing anything with pine. So I tweaked stock rom as much as I could, got it running very nicely even with my 130GB storage (link2sd). I also modified the ramdisk image to support init.d on boot. Im also using kickarse kernel script.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post how you did it? Thanks
@fol I would also be interested in it.
killervette said:
Can you post how you did it? Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used rom kichen to mess with ramdisk (it was very risky as messing with boot image can brick pine). I manually added init.d support. Then repacked it. Luckly it worked fine. I even flashed it to my sons.
I extracted stock system.zip and tweaked it the way I wanted (debloated added apps I owned), then flashed that. As I added init.d, I could use scripts on boot to alter running of pine.
Im currently using Project skynet vr4, which runs very nice.
@fol What is skynet? Do you have a link?

Categories

Resources