Database Users

Bubble Breaker

Hi does anyone know how top alter the stats in Bubble Breaker, a friend of mine has just beaten my high score and i want revenge ive been trying for ages to get near their score of 1732. I have found teh file Bubble Breaker.Dat but cant seem to edit it anyone any help pls.
:lol:

Just practice and your scores will improve....don't cheat

bubble breaker
Ha Ha my sister in law's top score is over 10,000 points :shock: i know OMG mine however is a lowley 780 not that great really but you should be able to smash your friends score :idea:

No way can you score 10,000 points on the standard game on its impossible, whats other peoples top score.

1622. Best game while at work on the toilet. :roll:

Mine is like 1200... My girlfriend plays religiously and she got somewhere in the 1700s. Yeah, we're lame and sit at home at night and play bubble breaker.

tennapop said:
Mine is like 1200... My girlfriend plays religiously and she got somewhere in the 1700s. Yeah, we're lame and sit at home at night and play bubble breaker.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
my best game of 'jawbreaker' (the old windows pcc2003 version) was just slightly above 2000 points. That was back when my axim was useful.

Come on someone must know how to edit the dat file so i can piss my mate off.

bazzert,
Don't listen to Molski. Why spend hours trying to beat your friend when you can make him mad in a couple of minutes. You wil need a hexadecimal editor, I guess you could do it on the wizard but it's easier on your PC with ultraedit or whatever you use. As you correctly guessed the high scores are stored in \windows\bubblebreaker.dat. Make a copy of it somewhere in case you mess it up badly...Open the file in your hexadecimal editor
You have to write down your high score, your average and the number of games. Let's say that your high score is 1732. Convert it to its hexadecimal value : 06C4. You have to look for the hexadecimal string x'C4060000' (notice the inversion : 06C4 has become C406) now, you think that you deserve 10000 points : 10000 = 2710 so just replace C4060000 by 10270000. Right, your high score has been taken care of. Now, let's multiply your average score by the number of games you played. You will get the total amount of points you scored. You score an average of 500 points and you played 10 times so 5000 points (88130000) that's the 4 bytes next to your high score in the .dat file. It's up to you to decide if you wish to change it to reflect your new score or may be you want to show that you score over 5000 points on average...
I will try to attach a copy of my Statistics. After only 3 games I have a high score of 10000 points using this method...
good luck!

pat12 this trick is f**king awesome!!!!!!
when my mate saw my highscore she just said what the hell!!
tanx..

the highest score I have achieved was 1964 once will prob. never get again

Mine is 2476

Dude you rock!!!
pat12 said:
bazzert,
Don't listen to Molski. Why spend hours trying to beat your friend when you can make him mad in a couple of minutes. You wil need a hexadecimal editor, I guess you could do it on the wizard but it's easier on your PC with ultraedit or whatever you use. As you correctly guessed the high scores are stored in \windows\bubblebreaker.dat. Make a copy of it somewhere in case you mess it up badly...Open the file in your hexadecimal editor
You have to write down your high score, your average and the number of games. Let's say that your high score is 1732. Convert it to its hexadecimal value : 06C4. You have to look for the hexadecimal string x'C4060000' (notice the inversion : 06C4 has become C406) now, you think that you deserve 10000 points : 10000 = 2710 so just replace C4060000 by 10270000. Right, your high score has been taken care of. Now, let's multiply your average score by the number of games you played. You will get the total amount of points you scored. You score an average of 500 points and you played 10 times so 5000 points (88130000) that's the 4 bytes next to your high score in the .dat file. It's up to you to decide if you wish to change it to reflect your new score or may be you want to show that you score over 5000 points on average...
I will try to attach a copy of my Statistics. After only 3 games I have a high score of 10000 points using this method...
good luck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just edited my high scores... It worked just fine...
Previously my gf got her score up to 9824...
She only have this phone for only few days...
So i had to do something...
She has a notorious record of kicking my a.. (rising diamonds)
So now i am again the smarter
Thanx again!!!

pat12
I am confused could you please tell me how to look for hexadecimal string?

my high score is 1818 which is 071A if i convert it into hexadecimal. I want high score of 3256 which is 0CB8. now someone please tell me what are the hexadecimal strings of 071A and 0CB8. Also how do i edit them in ultraedit
thanks

how exactly do you change the score becuse i opened up the bubble breaker.dat file and im confused form there my highest score was 1020

pat12
Thank you pat12

Playing megashift I Have been into the 5k range.. My wife still bested me into the 7k range though..
Also I Assume all the high scores are mostly on mega shift if they pass the 1k range.. Would have be be really lucky otherwise..

Why cheat? Just play the game and have fun...
I honestly don't get why so many people are trying to edit their high score to show someone up...what on earth are you proving?

can anyone help me pls ... my girlfriend did a score of 1992 and i want to change it to 3121 ... how do i do it because i really don`t understand what i have to do ... plssss heeeelllpppp

HD display in 32bit?

As per this post = http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=507897
Is this possible with this device?
I've looked at the point in the registry but i couldn't find it,can some1 who's a bit more familiar take a look please.

what is the benifit of making it 32 in stead of 16 bit excuse me for my low informations

Griff1 said:
As per this post = http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=507897
Is this possible with this device?
I've looked at the point in the registry but i couldn't find it,can some1 who's a bit more familiar take a look please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The screen itself should support 24 bit or 32bit, but Windows Mobile 6 only supports 16 Bit color. I don't think we will get 32 bit until Mobile 7 is release.
Anyways, if you compare the high resolution of the touch HD with another phone that uses 32 bit color(Iphone), I think it still looks better.
And to answer the other poster, higher bit gives more colors. 32 bits= 16 million.

GPU benchmarks

NENA- 15.5 FPS
GLBenchmark Pro 1.1 Result Details
Fill Rate: Multi-Textured 1.1 : 141938 kTexels/s
Lights: Parallel x 2 1.1 : 709 kTriangles/s
Lights: Parallel x 8 1.1 : 663 kTriangles/s
Lights: Spot x 1 1.1 : 662 kTriangles/s
Texture Size: 64×64 1.1 : 2587 kTriangles/s
GLBenchmark Pro ES 1.1 GPU Skinning : 448 Frames
GLBenchmark HD ES 1.1 CPU Skinning : 1546 Frames
Triangles: Textured + Color 1.1 : 2583 kTriangles/s
Texture Filter: NEAREST 1.1 : 2620 kTriangles/s
GLBenchmark Pro ES 1.1 CPU Skinning : 550 Frames
GLBenchmark HD ES 1.1 GPU Skinning : 1389 Frames
Swapbuffer speed : 611
Texture Size: 128×128 1.1 : 2613 kTriangles/s
3D Rendering Quality: Trilinear Filter : 97% (Success)
Triangles: Flat Shaded + Color 1.1 : 2761 kTriangles/s
CPU Performance: Integer : 6073
Texture Size: 256×256 1.1 : 2455 kTriangles/s
3D Rendering Quality: Sub Pixel Precision : 98% (Success)
Texture Size: 512×512 1.1 : 2623 kTriangles/s
Texture Filter: LINEAR 1.1 : 2904 kTriangles/s
Texture Filter: NEAREST_MIPMAP_LINEAR 1.1 : 2911 kTriangles/s
Texture Filter: LINEAR_MIPMAP_NEAREST 1.1 : 2786 kTriangles/s
Lights: Parallel x 1 1.1 : 715 kTriangles/s
3D Rendering Quality: Z-buffer Precision : 98.7% (Success)
3D Rendering Quality: Bilinear Filter : 97% (Success)
Lights: Omni x 1Lights: Omni x 1 1.1 : 693 kTriangles/s
Texture Filter: NEAREST_MIPMAP_NEAREST 1.1 : 2867 kTriangles/s
Triangles: Smooth Shaded + Color 1.1 : 2874 kTriangles/s
Triangles: Textured 1.1 : 2498 kTriangles/s
Lights: Parallel x 4 1.1 : 691 kTriangles/s
CPU Performance: Float : 1097
Texture Filter: LINEAR_MIPMAP_LINEAR 1.1 : 2487 kTriangles/s
Fill Rate: Single-textured 1.1 : 144350 kTexels/s
Texture Size: 1024×1024 1.1 : 2671 kTriangles/s
3D Rendering Quality: Perspective Correction : 100% (Success)
Lights: Ambient x 1 1.1 : 686 kTriangles/s
OpenGL ES Environment Variables
GL_VERSION GL_AMD_compressed_3DC_texture GL_AMD_compressed_ATC_texture GL_ARB_texture_env_combine GL_ARB_texture_env_dot3 GL_ARB_texture_mirrored_repeat GL_ARB_vertex_buffer_object GL_ATI_compressed_texture_atitc GL_ATI_texture_compression_atitc GL_EXT_blend_equation_separate GL_EXT_blend_func_separate GL_EXT_blend_minmax GL_EXT_blend_subtract GL_EXT_stencil_wrap GL_OES_EGL_image GL_OES_blend_equation_separate GL_OES_blend_func_separate GL_OES_blend_subtract GL_OES_compressed_ETC1_RGB8_texture GL_OES_compressed_paletted_texture GL_OES_draw_texture GL_OES_extended_matrix_palette GL_OES_framebuffer_object GL_OES_matrix_palette GL_OES_point_size_array GL_OES_point_sprite GL_OES_read_format GL_OES_stencil_wrap GL_OES_texture_cube_map GL_OES_texture_env_crossbar GL_OES_texture_mirrored_repeat
GL_RENDERER Adreno
GL_RED_BITS 5
GL_GREEN_BITS 6
GL_BLUE_BITS 5
GL_ALPHA_BITS 0
GL_DEPTH_BITS 16
GL_STENCIL_BITS 0
GL_SUBPIXEL_BITS 2
GL_MAX_LIGHTS 8
GL_IMPLEMENTATION_COLOR_READ_FORMAT_OES 6407
GL_IMPLEMENTATION_COLOR_READ_TYPE_OES 33635
GL_MAX_CLIP_PLANES 1
GL_MAX_MODELVIEW_STACK_DEPTH 16
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_STACK_DEPTH 2
GL_MAX_PROJECTION_STACK_DEPTH 4
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_SIZE 1024
GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS 2
GL_MAX_PALETTE_MATRICES_OES 20
GL_MAX_VERTEX_UNITS_OES 4
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_WIDTH 2048
GL_MAX_VIEWPORT_HEIGHT 2048
GL_NUM_COMPRESSED_TEXTURE_FORMATS 10
GL_ALIASED_LINE_WIDTH_MIN 1
GL_ALIASED_LINE_WIDTH_MAX 8
GL_ALIASED_POINT_SIZE_MIN 1
GL_ALIASED_POINT_SIZE_MAX 128
GL_SMOOTH_LINE_WIDTH_MIN 1
GL_SMOOTH_LINE_WIDTH_MAX 1
GL_SMOOTH_POINT_SIZE_MIN 1
GL_SMOOTH_POINT_SIZE_MAX 128
EGL Native Platform Graphics Interface
EGL Vendor Android
EGL Version 1.4 Android META-EGL
EGL Extensions EGL_KHR_image EGL_KHR_image_base EGL_KHR_image_pixmap EGL_ANDROID_image_native_buffer EGL_ANDROID_swap_rectangle EGL_ANDROID_get_render_buffer
Device Information
android.os.Build.BOARD espresso
android.os.Build.BRAND tmobile
android.os.Build.DEVICE espresso
android.os.Build.FINGERPRINT tmobile/htc_espresso/espresso/espresso:2.1-update1/ERE27/176807:user/release-keys
android.os.Build.HOST Oven-X02
android.os.Build.MODEL T-Mobile myTouch 3G Slide
android.os.Build.PRODUCT htc_espresso
android.os.Build.TAGS release-keys
android.os.Build.TIME 1273493546000
android.os.Build.TYPE user
android.os.Build.USER u70000
android.os.Build.VERSION.INCREMENTAL 176807
android.os.Build.VERSION.RELEASE 2.1-update1
android.os.Build.VERSION.SDK 7
OS Android
Screen size 480 x 320
Hope this helps you guys to make a decision

Yes, this garbled bunch of text to us simpletons helps a lot
With that said, how does it compare to others out there?

Most of it kicks ass for a "midrange device".

Yes, this garbled bunch of text to us simpletons helps a lot
With that said, how does it compare to others out there?
__________________
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, The FPS is nothing like the N1 (around 24 i think) but it still beats the iPhone (got that from Nena.apk). And midrange is not quite what this device really is. I think it would be low High range. once root hits we will see dramatic improvements with this device. CPU will go up to 998 at least, and the GPU (i actually got it up to 18fps) may also increase if we can find out WHAT fracking GPU actually is, lol. The garbled mess is just the output from GLbenchmark.apk. I ran the entire test which puts the phone out of buisness for about 15 minutes, but someone had to post this. I have played every 3d game in the market on this phone and it played them all quite nice. I can get it to play 720p video but it skips and nly gives a frame here and there, this i hope will also change. need swap and apps2sd.

Hah, I know I know, I was bustin your balls. The garbled text I could understand, but I figured a little more explanation would help for the masses of others where that info would not register at all.
I totally agree though. Luckily, when I heard this phone was available, I went right to the store and played with it, without hearing anything else about it. I fear that if I would have heard all the talk about it being mid-range, I may have never given it a thought and just stuck with my G1 until something else came. I think this thing performs very well, and my only gripe is the internal memory being hogged up by Sense. BUT, even with it, it is still pretty snappy. I am actually really happy with the video quality of this phone.

I am currently running an Evo and the Slide (also have an n900, HD2 and a Pre). The Slide with its modest specs on paper runs MUCH smoother then the Evo (flame suit activated). I don't know if it has to do with the 30fps cap on the Evo or what but I noticed it almost immediately when I received the slide.
The EVO may have the higher res larger screen and snapdragon processor but man HTC and TMobile worked wonders with this Slide. I have been very impressed. And this thing is know we don't represent the vast majority of the public when it comes to our perception of devices. Alot of the niggles (wow did I just use niggle that in a sentence?) things we notice most people don't. Having said that my wife immediately recognized the difference in smoothness.
Here is hoping the EVO framerate is fixed but yeah this thing doesn't run like a mid range device. Too bad the slide action isn't as smooth as it could be.

The slide action smoothes out. I have had mine for about a month now and it slides quite nicely now.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

side note
The slide action smooths out. I have had mine for about a month now and it slides quite nicely now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have not even used the slide function, Swype is pretty sweet and very functional. the terminal is the only place i have needed the real keyboard.
On a side note------
It is weird but i hated the Sense UI, i am using Helix launcher, it runs better and coming from a p4w3d G1 it is much more user friendly. What i wanted to say is that with helix i get a much better feel and less lag. the sense UI has actually given me 2 acore crashes so far, i have had no problems with the Helix. also to let everyone know that if you add a contact to MyFavs and then remove that contact, in Sense UI it deletes that contact from your contact and all its linked profiles. i had to re friend my fiance and brother in google, FB, twitter and the whole 9. Not cool!

orangemaze said:
The slide action smoothes out. I have had mine for about a month now and it slides quite nicely now.
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This was pretty much the same with the G1 also. It just needs to settle to actually being opened and closed and it will feel very nice. I know mine is already starting to get that feel and I love it.

class 6 8gb benchmark results in WM, looking for some1 with a class 10 16gb for tests

I have searched these forums but haven't found any performance results in the OS so I tested my class 6 card (ridata 8gb) in pocket mechanic.
I would like to upgrade to a 16gb card but can't decide if it is worth to upgrade to a Kingston 16GB MicroSDHC 16GB Class 10 card. I am not sure if the HD2 can benefit from a class 10 card (for a faster Android). So if anyone has a class 10 card, can you test it using pocket mechanic here? It is free for 30 days.
I found these results on a french site but they seem quite ambitious.
Hardware perf index = 851.67
perf filesystem index = 2153
read test (unbuffered) = 282.7 x (41.41 MB / sec)
read test (buffered) = 519.6 x (76.11 MB / sec)
write test (unbuffered) = 4.4X (655.90 kb / sec)
write test (buffered) = 14.2x (2.07 MB / sec)
General filesystem test = 11.59 transactions / sec
Low level unbuffered read test = 89.8 x (13.15 MB / sec)
Low level buffered read test) = 427.1x (62.56 MB / sec)
attached are my results, low level tests didn't work for me. What does low level mean?

If i see that benchmark,a class 10 would not help you.
I also have a class 6 from sandisk,and it does a max of 18mb/s in windows.
I see that you get not 18mb/s in the device,so i think that a class 10 is not faster,atleast not in the device.
Just a theorie,i dont have a idea what the max writing/read speed are for the HD 2 himself?
Anyone?

My results
amilo123 said:
I have searched these forums but haven't found any performance results in the OS so I tested my class 6 card (ridata 8gb) in pocket mechanic.
I would like to upgrade to a 16gb card but can't decide if it is worth to upgrade to a Kingston 16GB MicroSDHC 16GB Class 10 card. I am not sure if the HD2 can benefit from a class 10 card (for a faster Android). So if anyone has a class 10 card, can you test it using pocket mechanic here? It is free for 30 days.
I found these results on a french site but they seem quite ambitious.
Hardware perf index = 851.67
perf filesystem index = 2153
read test (unbuffered) = 282.7 x (41.41 MB / sec)
read test (buffered) = 519.6 x (76.11 MB / sec)
write test (unbuffered) = 4.4X (655.90 kb / sec)
write test (buffered) = 14.2x (2.07 MB / sec)
General filesystem test = 11.59 transactions / sec
Low level unbuffered read test = 89.8 x (13.15 MB / sec)
Low level buffered read test) = 427.1x (62.56 MB / sec)
attached are my results, low level tests didn't work for me. What does low level mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a class 10 16gb.
Downloaded Pocket Mechanic 2.99.283, installed it in Winmo 1.66 fre, no extra apps.
Running Benchmark on my sdcard give me always an Winmo error, choose do not send to Microsoft, but let me continue tests. Here are results:
File system read test (unbuffered) 14.58 MB/sec
-----------"--------- (buffered) 18.50 MB/sec
-----------"--------- (unbuffered) 1.26 MB/sec
-----------"--------- (buffered) 6.88 MB/sec
File system general test 12.49 operations
Hope this help.

Hmz,so i will stay on my class 6 card.
Or some 1 with a class 10 that runs this test,and comes above 18mb/s

emottier said:
I have a class 10 16gb.
Downloaded Pocket Mechanic 2.99.283, installed it in Winmo 1.66 fre, no extra apps.
Running Benchmark on my sdcard give me always an Winmo error, choose do not send to Microsoft, but let me continue tests. Here are results:
File system read test (unbuffered) 14.58 MB/sec
-----------"--------- (buffered) 18.50 MB/sec
-----------"--------- (unbuffered) 1.26 MB/sec
-----------"--------- (buffered) 6.88 MB/sec
File system general test 12.49 operations
Hope this help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for the feedback, it seems the 50+ euros in price difference are not worth it, I will stick to a TeamGroup 16GB MicroSDHC Class 6

Class 10
amilo123 said:
thanks for the feedback, it seems the 50+ euros in price difference are not worth it, I will stick to a TeamGroup 16GB MicroSDHC Class 6
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, class 10 is expensive about 121.-Sfr, and not obviously more performant than a class 6.

Droid Turbo PVS bin

What is the PVS bin? It is a known fact that not all semiconductor chips leave the factory equal because of complicated baking process, and for most expensive complex articles like CPU and GPU manufacturers introduced a sorting practice called "binning". Qualcomm also has such scale for their chips, that consist of PVS value range from 1 to 15, to aware Android software how many voltage it should apply to CPU on a certain clock to run error free. The bigger PVS value is, the lesser power required to run CPU stable. So, the story is about energy effectiveness.
Please, share your Droid Turbo PVS bin in a poll.
How to know your bin: use file manager to go to the path /proc/cpu/, and open file msm_acpu_pvs as a text.
PVS bin value is stored as a hexadecimal, so when you see a letter instead of a digit, convert it to decimal like: A=10, B=11, C=12, D=13, E=12, F=15, and vote in the poll above. Thanks! )
(Inspired by this thread)

Mine is 3
Oops. Didn't see the options above

Cobra04 said:
Mine is 3
Oops. Didn't see the options above
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LOL. Sorry, added poll lately ) Mine is 6.

Voted. Mines 8.
Does this essentially mean I can undervolt more before the device becomes unstable and reboots, than someone who has a PVS value of let's say 2?

iiWoodstocK said:
Voted. Mines 8.
Does this essentially mean I can undervolt more before the device becomes unstable and reboots, than someone who has a PVS value of let's say 2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. Probably, your SoC CPU cristal with "8" was in the center of semiconductor wafer, and mine "6" was somewhere closer to the side
The difference in voltage applied not so big, I guess, from 0 to 20mV max in your favor.
As for the "2" CPU, it is tougher, and will be auto driven by higher voltage. Or we set it manually by installing custom kernel with voltage tune support, and try to earn your effectiveness. But then, again, you can start manual control too, tuning voltage down, and Turbo with "2" will suck (

s5610 said:
Yes. Probably, your SoC CPU cristal with "8" was in the center of semiconductor wafer, and mine "6" was somewhere closer to the side
The difference in voltage applied not so big, I guess, from 0 to 20mV max in your favor.
As for the "2" CPU, it is tougher, and will be auto driven by higher voltage. Or we set it manually by installing custom kernel with voltage tune support, and try to earn your effectiveness. But then, again, you can start manual control too, tuning voltage down, and Turbo with "2" will suck (
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Interesting! Thank you for the explanation! So I guess that's why I'm able to undervolt -70mV without encountering stability issues, where others would get reboots if they did the same.

Mine is 6 and was written as digit

I have a 64gb turbo with 2 :_( :_(

4
Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

8 on xt1250

Mine was 6 (which I voted-in)
My wife's phone is 4 (which I cannot vote-in because the poll won't let me vote twice)

schwinn8 said:
Mine was 6 (which I voted-in)
My wife's phone is 4 (which I cannot vote-in because the poll won't let me vote twice)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
) I can't double vote too, having 7 pcs by the hand. PVS bits on them are: PVS4 - 1 pcs, PVS5 - 4 pcs, PVS7 - 1 pcs, PVS9 - 1 pcs.