Guys I have a question.
I have stock rom but I'm using custom kernel expecially for UnderVolt.
I want UV not for battery life, that IMHO don't get incresed that much, but for heat reason.
Is it possible to have a stock kernel just with undervolting? Would be that hard to build such a kernel by myself?
Michelechele said:
Guys I have a question.
I have stock rom but I'm using custom kernel expecially for UnderVolt.
I want UV not for battery life, that IMHO don't get incresed that much, but for heat reason.
Is it possible to have a stock kernel just with undervolting? Would be that hard to build such a kernel by myself?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, you cannot undervolt with a stock kernel. If you know how to enable undervolting in a kernel then good job!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Why would you prefer stock kernel vs other custom one? You get better results witth custom
In the Harsh kernel thread he's provided stock kernel with UV several times you can do a search there or ask there, also Harsh kernel itself is modified stock kernel with tons of optimizations, UV etc
hi there, could anyone tell me which custom kernel for note 4 supports IntelliDemand Governor? Thanks
I'm not sure but you could check emotroid kernel here at xda or ael kernel from echoe team (google it, they aren't here amymore). They could be also other for your device. Take a care to flash the one that supports your note.
which kernel, rom do i need?
i saw a guy he had 32k antutu score on Stock rom
now i am using Motion Rom + Emotion kernel. Yeah, its good but too much battery drain (no overclocks)
or should i use stock rom?
98181735 said:
which kernel, rom do i need?
i saw a guy he had 32k antutu score on Stock rom
now i am using Motion Rom + Emotion kernel. Yeah, its good but too much battery drain (no overclocks)
or should i use stock rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird, battery life with emotion kernel is pretty good man and the performance is very good
I had CM 12.1 with Renix63 kernel v2.0 KCAL Zram and it was smooth and stable than TW 5.1.1 Motion LL - but a want TW look than CM
For performance flash @n1kolaa cm12.1
It is frequently updated and it's stable enough
Kernel is included inside
It will give you 25k on antutu without any configuration.
Hi guys and gals, have a quick question. I have a N910V Verizon variant Note 4 and had been running the Emotion r21 kernel on my highly modified but otherwise factory TW 5.1.1 rom. I have been looking for a kernel that works and has f2fs support because I want to try it out. Today I found an awesome kernel, the AEL 5.1.1. Ed. 3.10.101 kernel for the N910F/G dated March 16, 2016. I cannot find anywhere that says this kernel may or may not have f2fs support. Does anyone know if it does??
Chuck
digitalchaos1980 said:
Hi guys and gals, have a quick question. I have a N910V Verizon variant Note 4 and had been running the Emotion r21 kernel on my highly modified but otherwise factory TW 5.1.1 rom. I have been looking for a kernel that works and has f2fs support because I want to try it out. Today I found an awesome kernel, the AEL 5.1.1. Ed. 3.10.101 kernel for the N910F/G dated March 16, 2016. I cannot find anywhere that says this kernel may or may not have f2fs support. Does anyone know if it does??
Chuck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have the phone and the kernel, you can try, Or not?
Rajada said:
If you have the phone and the kernel, you can try, Or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I guess I can always try it and restore back if it doesn't work. Might just do that later
Chuck
--------------------------SOLVED----------------------------
OK well I did a Nandroid backup, changed /data and /cache partitions to f2fs filesystem and restored my data backup and boy the system did NOT like that, so I'm guessing this kernel doesn't yet support f2fs. It would be nice if I could somehow add the support to it in the existing kernel. Does anyone know possibly how I could achieve that??
Chuck
ael is a kernel without public sources, so, you cant have any trust in this kernel.
Some time ago, I used a kernel with f2fs in note 3, and honestly I did not see any advantage.
However if you want to try f2fs, my advice is, leave the ael kernel for children, its not a serious thing, and compile your own kernel.
It is not difficult to make a kernel with f2fs, from what I remember in note 3, the major difficulty was in changing the ramdisk.
Currently I have no time for these activities, but maybe in a few weeks I can have some free time for this.
Rajada said:
ael is a kernel without public sources, so, you cant have any trust in this kernel.
Some time ago, I used a kernel with f2fs in note 3, and honestly I did not see any advantage.
However if you want to try f2fs, my advice is, leave the ael kernel for children, its not a serious thing, and compile your own kernel.
It is not difficult to make a kernel with f2fs, from what I remember in note 3, the major difficulty was in changing the ramdisk.
Currently I have no time for these activities, but maybe in a few weeks I can have some free time for this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply. That sucks about not trusting this kernel. I've been running it close to a week now and actually like it better than the Emotion kernel I was running. It is so smooth and battery life has been great, even with a mild overclock! If I could ask, what would I not be able to trust about this one? Anyways, I might look into compiling my own kernel but I've never done one. I am a power user so I wouldn't be scared to try lol. If you do end up trying in the coming weeks then I honestly would appreciate it but you don't have to on my account
Chuck
digitalchaos1980 said:
Thanks for the reply. That sucks about not trusting this kernel. I've been running it close to a week now and actually like it better than the Emotion kernel I was running. It is so smooth and battery life has been great, even with a mild overclock! If I could ask, what would I not be able to trust about this one? Anyways, I might look into compiling my own kernel but I've never done one. I am a power user so I wouldn't be scared to try lol. If you do end up trying in the coming weeks then I honestly would appreciate it but you don't have to on my account
Chuck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I refuse to use a kernel without public sources. you use what you think is best for you.
but it was you, who said, that the ael kernel supports f2fs but that does not work. It seems to be a untrusted kernel.
Rajada said:
I refuse to use a kernel without public sources. you use what you think is best for you.
but it was you, who said, that the ael kernel supports f2fs but that does not work. It seems to be a untrusted kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I didn't say it supports f2fs. I said that I was looking for a kernel that supports f2fs and I couldn't find anywhere that lists the features of the AEL kernel so I could see if it does support f2fs. Since I couldn't find a list of features or a changelog, I decided to try it and see if the support was there, but it wasn't :/
Chuck
Hello, i'm looking of kernel for j510fn. Some times ago there was cherry kernel but dev stopped working on it. Is there any kernel or mod for good perfomance and battery saving?
mrandor said:
Hello, i'm looking of kernel for j510fn. Some times ago there was cherry kernel but dev stopped working on it. Is there any kernel or mod for good perfomance and battery saving?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
use stock kernel with wifi fix i found it to be the best in respect to performence and battery if you want i can give you the link to it
ankitv6 said:
use stock kernel with wifi fix i found it to be the best in respect to performence and battery if you want i can give you the link to it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you give me the link too plz