Hi guys and gals, have a quick question. I have a N910V Verizon variant Note 4 and had been running the Emotion r21 kernel on my highly modified but otherwise factory TW 5.1.1 rom. I have been looking for a kernel that works and has f2fs support because I want to try it out. Today I found an awesome kernel, the AEL 5.1.1. Ed. 3.10.101 kernel for the N910F/G dated March 16, 2016. I cannot find anywhere that says this kernel may or may not have f2fs support. Does anyone know if it does??
Chuck
digitalchaos1980 said:
Hi guys and gals, have a quick question. I have a N910V Verizon variant Note 4 and had been running the Emotion r21 kernel on my highly modified but otherwise factory TW 5.1.1 rom. I have been looking for a kernel that works and has f2fs support because I want to try it out. Today I found an awesome kernel, the AEL 5.1.1. Ed. 3.10.101 kernel for the N910F/G dated March 16, 2016. I cannot find anywhere that says this kernel may or may not have f2fs support. Does anyone know if it does??
Chuck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you have the phone and the kernel, you can try, Or not?
Rajada said:
If you have the phone and the kernel, you can try, Or not?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea I guess I can always try it and restore back if it doesn't work. Might just do that later
Chuck
--------------------------SOLVED----------------------------
OK well I did a Nandroid backup, changed /data and /cache partitions to f2fs filesystem and restored my data backup and boy the system did NOT like that, so I'm guessing this kernel doesn't yet support f2fs. It would be nice if I could somehow add the support to it in the existing kernel. Does anyone know possibly how I could achieve that??
Chuck
ael is a kernel without public sources, so, you cant have any trust in this kernel.
Some time ago, I used a kernel with f2fs in note 3, and honestly I did not see any advantage.
However if you want to try f2fs, my advice is, leave the ael kernel for children, its not a serious thing, and compile your own kernel.
It is not difficult to make a kernel with f2fs, from what I remember in note 3, the major difficulty was in changing the ramdisk.
Currently I have no time for these activities, but maybe in a few weeks I can have some free time for this.
Rajada said:
ael is a kernel without public sources, so, you cant have any trust in this kernel.
Some time ago, I used a kernel with f2fs in note 3, and honestly I did not see any advantage.
However if you want to try f2fs, my advice is, leave the ael kernel for children, its not a serious thing, and compile your own kernel.
It is not difficult to make a kernel with f2fs, from what I remember in note 3, the major difficulty was in changing the ramdisk.
Currently I have no time for these activities, but maybe in a few weeks I can have some free time for this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the reply. That sucks about not trusting this kernel. I've been running it close to a week now and actually like it better than the Emotion kernel I was running. It is so smooth and battery life has been great, even with a mild overclock! If I could ask, what would I not be able to trust about this one? Anyways, I might look into compiling my own kernel but I've never done one. I am a power user so I wouldn't be scared to try lol. If you do end up trying in the coming weeks then I honestly would appreciate it but you don't have to on my account
Chuck
digitalchaos1980 said:
Thanks for the reply. That sucks about not trusting this kernel. I've been running it close to a week now and actually like it better than the Emotion kernel I was running. It is so smooth and battery life has been great, even with a mild overclock! If I could ask, what would I not be able to trust about this one? Anyways, I might look into compiling my own kernel but I've never done one. I am a power user so I wouldn't be scared to try lol. If you do end up trying in the coming weeks then I honestly would appreciate it but you don't have to on my account
Chuck
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I refuse to use a kernel without public sources. you use what you think is best for you.
but it was you, who said, that the ael kernel supports f2fs but that does not work. It seems to be a untrusted kernel.
Rajada said:
I refuse to use a kernel without public sources. you use what you think is best for you.
but it was you, who said, that the ael kernel supports f2fs but that does not work. It seems to be a untrusted kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, I didn't say it supports f2fs. I said that I was looking for a kernel that supports f2fs and I couldn't find anywhere that lists the features of the AEL kernel so I could see if it does support f2fs. Since I couldn't find a list of features or a changelog, I decided to try it and see if the support was there, but it wasn't :/
Chuck
Related
So searching comes up with >1 year old threads and not really answering my question.
I got a used N4 recently for my daughter, and I want it to be as fast and stable as possible. I unlocked, then ADB flashed the currrent Google image and then rooted, made it ART runtime and applied the Z2 Bionic lib zip, applied current Franco kernel. Then I was halted in terms of is that the fastest?
Is that best combination which exists right now?
Is CM11 better?
I didn't really form a concluson of the Z2 Dalvik lib vs ART.
From what I know, this patch is currently faster than ART itself:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/general/4-4-4-4-x-qualcomm-optimized-dalvik-t2546120
Since ART is 'experimental' right now of course it lacks of improvements, but I am sure if Android L is released this October this wouldnt be the case anymore.
Also some Custom Roms like Cyanogenmod has its own optimized bionic libs, sometimes better than the stock ones or any patches. I highly recommend you to try this out, because than you dont have to search and compare no more.
In terms of kernel, I would not recommend you to use franco's kernel on a Custom Rom. Make sure to use any other kernel. This is just my personal experiences with franco's kernel and someone might call me too dumb to use this kernel, but why do I have so much trouble with franco and every other kernel runs fine like matr1x, ak or semaphore? Judge for yourself
CCody said:
From what I know, this patch is currently faster than ART itself:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-4/general/4-4-4-4-x-qualcomm-optimized-dalvik-t2546120
Since ART is 'experimental' right now of course it lacks of improvements, but I am sure if Android L is released this October this wouldnt be the case anymore.
Also some Custom Roms like Cyanogenmod has its own optimized bionic libs, sometimes better than the stock ones or any patches. I highly recommend you to try this out, because than you dont have to search and compare no more.
In terms of kernel, I would not recommend you to use franco's kernel on a Custom Rom. Make sure to use any other kernel. This is just my personal experiences with franco's kernel and someone might call me too dumb to use this kernel, but why do I have so much trouble with franco and every other kernel runs fine like matr1x, ak or semaphore? Judge for yourself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right so I saw the claim that sticking with Dalvic and using the optimised Dalvik lib is faster but I gave up keeping track of it as too much "feels" and "benchmarks aren't representative" conclusion.
Noting to avoid Franco with custom ROMs. The custom one I did was CM and Franco warns to not use it!
nigelhealy said:
So searching comes up with >1 year old threads and not really answering my question.
I got a used N4 recently for my daughter, and I want it to be as fast and stable as possible. I unlocked, then ADB flashed the currrent Google image and then rooted, made it ART runtime and applied the Z2 Bionic lib zip, applied current Franco kernel. Then I was halted in terms of is that the fastest?
Is that best combination which exists right now?
Is CM11 better?
I didn't really form a concluson of the Z2 Dalvik lib vs ART.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the fastest.. whatever im using.
but really, these kinds of threads arent allowed on xda since you are asking us to compare roms. oh, ill clue you in a little, cm isnt even close to the fastest. and no, franco kernel isnt the fastest either.
Best ROM/kernel threads are not allowed on XDA
The best bet is to head over to the development sections and try some out for yourself and see which combination suits you best
Thread closed
Q&A for [KERNEL][GPL][N7]franco.Kernel - r80
Some developers prefer that questions remain separate from their main development thread to help keep things organized. Placing your question within this thread will increase its chances of being answered by a member of the community or by the developer. Thanks for understanding and for helping to keep XDA neat and tidy! :smile:
Grouper "fast charge"
dskies said:
Guys..please stop immediately to ask to enable fast-charging on grouper.
1: batteries are replaceable and taking the back off a grouper takes me about 30 seconds (they just clip in)
2: It's not just USB. When on a generic AC charger it's _still_ limited to 500mA
which leads to:
3: If left charging without shutting the thing down, @ 500mA in, it takes upwards of 20 hours to get to fully charged and if playing a game such as minon rush (or using GPS + torque in the car) there's a net _discharge_ which eventually results in a flat battery and the device shutting down.
It's not about "fast charging" the battery. It's about supplying enough current to keep the device running for extended periods without flattening the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@franciscofranco Is this kernel not compatible with CM11 on nexus 7 (2012) ? I am using FKU and when i click on r80 install it throws a warning that the kernel may not be compatible as i am using cyanogenMod ROM. can you please let me ?
Loved it on OnePlus one and want to install it on nexus 7...
Caf roms only apply to qualcomm chips, the tegra3 is not one.
---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:42 PM ----------
@franciscofranco, can we expect f2fs-all support soon, and perhaps color profiles? Thanks!
Hi bro,
Are U working on Nexus 7 Grouper for FK Lollipop 5.0? We're quite desperate knowing this brand new ROM is not actually supporting external/USB DAC. Being promised by Google to natively support the features, we felt rather disappointed. I suspect there is something wrong with the kernel which is rather old.
Should you have time to play with it please do it, a little challenge for you that will bring joys to us around the globe
Thanks
I'm also hoping for usb DAC support to be fixed in lollipop. I'm about to the point where I need to either get tutoring in the finer points of github+ubuntu or buy the N7 2013, which does seem to have DAC support enabled. Anyone willing to teach? The commits for kitkat were present in kangaroo kernel, and timurs kernel. Not sure about changes for lollipop. Hopefully some genius will figure it out in the not too distant future, please?
Android 5.0.2
Hey,
I just installed the franco.kernel updater but it says 'unsupported device'. I have a n7 2012 with android 5.0.2. Can someone help?
Hi all, there is a possibility to download a stable version for CM 10.0?
Why does Franko Kernel for nexus 7 not have the RAW I/o scheduler?
it work , i tried on my nexus 7 5.1.
it work , i tried on my nexus 7 5.1.
r82 also works here with 5.1.1. No issues observed.
Franco r82 kernel vs optipop doesn't work
Just wanted to ask would it be possible for Franco to fix r82 and simply make it work with optipop? For now r82 is advertised as f2fs support and 5.1.1 yet no chance of flashing it on optipop everytime I do that I get system UI doesn't respond or just black screen after booting up.
I'm talking about nexus 2012
Thanks
Frank doesn't allow overclocks, doesn't believe in fast charge like its the toothfairy or something?
I would strongly reccomend another kernel but there are only so many options left. The 2012 tablet is getting old and no one devs for it really anymore.
I used to use only franks kernels but the guy is abrasive and due to leaving out crucial features I can't ever again reccomend his kernels.
Also while it says f2fs support on the box, its not what comes in the tin. As the above user mentioned it bootloops optipop (only ROM left worth running IMO)
fwayfarer said:
Frank doesn't allow overclocks, doesn't believe in fast charge like its the toothfairy or something?
I would strongly reccomend another kernel but there are only so many options left. The 2012 tablet is getting old and no one devs for it really anymore.
I used to use only franks kernels but the guy is abrasive and due to leaving out crucial features I can't ever again reccomend his kernels.
Also while it says f2fs support on the box, its not what comes in the tin. As the above user mentioned it bootloops optipop (only ROM left worth running IMO)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What other f2fs kernel for optipop would you recommend? I'm atm on uber and it's good kernel fast and all no freezing at all but comparing to Franco battery last shorter time not really a big deal plus Franco offer more options to manage kernel than uber for example tcp and I/O
Yeah but you still can't use fast charge and he literally belittled people asking for him at add that and overclocking. I can't even remember what I flashed I would have to go and check the tablet - if I flashed anything at all. F2fs (especially f2fs all) kernels for grouper are sparse, and those that exist don't include everything that people think they "should".
fwayfarer said:
Yeah but you still can't use fast charge and he literally belittled people asking for him at add that and overclocking. I can't even remember what I flashed I would have to go and check the tablet - if I flashed anything at all. F2fs (especially f2fs all) kernels for grouper are sparse, and those that exist don't include everything that people think they "should".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Found solution installed m-kernel and got everything I wanted
Franco kernel and cm12.1
Hi this is my first post on the forums
I flashed the version modified for cm12.1 on my nexus 7.
Details
Nexus 7 2012 3g+wifi
rooted
running cm12.1
TWRP recovery
So I flashed it and it took over 8 minutes to boot up.When it finaly booted up i got a message saying I have low memory.I checked my memory and I have 12 gigs and some change available. Also battery is draining even when charging! I know this isnt official or anything just thaught Id post my results.Im gonna carry on using my tab with this kernel for a while to see if I can sort it out.
I got tired of the long boots so I used TWRP to load a backup.Tab is back to normal now.Pity this doesnt work.When I was using Paranoid I had Franco kernel and it was great.
I successfully completed the conversion to dev mode and root my device. I have the multi-system kernel at this time but was wondering which kernel gives the best battery life and which are most people using?
The only 2 kernels I am aware of that are available are the emotion and multi-system ones. Is there something else?
My N4 performs well with this multi-system kernel Courtesy of @hsbadr
I've been using the Eceed Kernel by @kairi_zeroblade:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4/snapdragon-dev/kernel-xceed-t3344742
there is a verizon version. I had no problems flashing this onto my jasmine rom 4.3 running android 5.1.1.
One user reported loosing data(4g) with this kernel but didnt give any info on what rom or firmware he was running.
the kernel works great so far, much better battery life. Scores 82,000+ consistently on antutu.
The kernel comes pre configured. The only things you can change if you wish is the cpu voltages, cpu currents, and a couple of read ahead tweaks in Synapse
the only thing I noticed was some camera lag (a bit slower to open and to switch from front to rear) that @kairi_zeroblade said could be due to the strict cpu settings. I believe hes working on a 6.0 MM kernel right now that should work for verizon.
Definitely worth a shot to check it out!!!! If you have any feedback just post in the original thread.
joemill said:
I've been using the Eceed Kernel by @kairi_zeroblade:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4/snapdragon-dev/kernel-xceed-t3344742
there is a verizon version. I had no problems flashing this onto my jasmine rom 4.3 running android 5.1.1.
One user reported loosing data(4g) with this kernel but didnt give any info on what rom or firmware he was running.
the kernel works great so far, much better battery life. Scores 82,000+ consistently on antutu.
The kernel comes pre configured. The only things you can change if you wish is the cpu voltages, cpu currents, and a couple of read ahead tweaks in Synapse
the only thing I noticed was some camera lag (a bit slower to open and to switch from front to rear) that @kairi_zeroblade said could be due to the strict cpu settings. I believe hes working on a 6.0 MM kernel right now that should work for verizon.
Definitely worth a shot to check it out!!!! If you have any feedback just post in the original thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Got same results in antutu which is pretty awesome as fast as s6 but have no data on kyubi'so rom
This one: http://forum.xda-developers.com/not...nt/firmware-safe-upgrade-to-lollipop-t3313224
I use the screen mirroring option all the time. I would say test that out to determine which kernel is best for you. I know one of the kernels floating around doesn't support screen mirroring which is a big no no for me.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 05:13 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:12 PM ----------
Not really big on Viper and over clocking so maybe someone else could shed some light on those features.
Sent from my SM-N910V using Tapatalk
axeldiks1 said:
Got same results in antutu which is pretty awesome as fast as s6 but have no data on kyubi'so rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How are you guys getting over 82,000+. I'm only getting 72,000 with Jasmine
Dovanote said:
How are you guys getting over 82,000+. I'm only getting 72,000 with Jasmine
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Xceed kernel is over clocked to 2.8ghz and has various other tweaks
joemill said:
The Xceed kernel is over clocked to 2.8ghz and has various other tweaks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't tweaked anything yet and this kernal is pretty nice. Battery life seems to last longer. Gotta test for a few more days.
Dovanote said:
I haven't tweaked anything yet and this kernal is pretty nice. Battery life seems to last longer. Gotta test for a few more days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xceed comes pre tweaked. The only thing that may give a little more speed is changing the internal and SD card read ahead from 512 to 2048mb and cfq as the scheduler. Most other adjustments are untouchable
any 6.0 roms working on the verizon note 4?
joemill said:
I've been using the Eceed Kernel by @kairi_zeroblade:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4/snapdragon-dev/kernel-xceed-t3344742
there is a verizon version. I had no problems flashing this onto my jasmine rom 4.3 running android 5.1.1.
One user reported loosing data(4g) with this kernel but didnt give any info on what rom or firmware he was running.
the kernel works great so far, much better battery life. Scores 82,000+ consistently on antutu.
The kernel comes pre configured. The only things you can change if you wish is the cpu voltages, cpu currents, and a couple of read ahead tweaks in Synapse
the only thing I noticed was some camera lag (a bit slower to open and to switch from front to rear) that @kairi_zeroblade said could be due to the strict cpu settings. I believe hes working on a 6.0 MM kernel right now that should work for verizon.
Definitely worth a shot to check it out!!!! If you have any feedback just post in the original thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I lost my 4g also and I am on kubyi ultimate.I really want to try this kernel again, but I need the 4g..
Sent from my SM-N920F using Tapatalk
lolwatpear said:
any 6.0 roms working on the verizon note 4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hsbadr has a CM 13 port which is 6.0
CM 13 6.0.1 Unofficial
MatroxD said:
I lost my 4g also and I am on kubyi ultimate.I really want to try this kernel again, but I need the 4g..
Sent from my SM-N920F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So looks like the kubyi rom will not work with this kernel. :/ I'm guessing the data fix will have to be patched into the Xceed kernel.
I haven't had the time to read through this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4-tmobile/general/running-international-roms-n910t-t3220738
Is it only for the n910t varient?
Does anyone have any info on the data fix for the verizon kernel so maybe @kairi_zeroblade can add it to the next build.?
joemill said:
So looks like the kubyi rom will not work with this kernel. :/ I'm guessing the data fix will have to be patched into the Xceed kernel.
I haven't had the time to read through this:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/note-4-tmobile/general/running-international-roms-n910t-t3220738
Is it only for the n910t varient?
Does anyone have any info on the data fix for the verizon kernel so maybe @kairi_zeroblade can add it to the next build.?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What info do you want to know about the datafix for Kyubi? It has multisystem kernel included. So far that is the only kernel that is compatible with Kyubi. No changes to the kernel were made to make it work with Kyubi. It just happened to work when I tried flashing Kyubi on our phone. So it became part of the datafix since it worked so well. I think if anything, @kairi_zeroblade should talk with @hsbadr the developer of multisystem kernel. We got lucky that hsbadr's kernel worked !
bostonsean said:
Hsbadr has a CM 13 port which is 6.0
CM 13 6.0.1 Unofficial
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant stock mm roms. I noticed the snapdragon note 4 forums have them, but I'm not sure if they will work on the Verizon note 4.
jcip17 said:
What info do you want to know about the datafix for Kyubi? It has multisystem kernel included. So far that is the only kernel that is compatible with Kyubi. No changes to the kernel were made to make it work with Kyubi. It just happened to work when I tried flashing Kyubi on our phone. So it became part of the datafix since it worked so well. I think if anything, @kairi_zeroblade should talk with @hsbadr the developer of multisystem kernel. We got lucky that hsbadr's kernel worked !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking there was some type of patch or fix @hsbadr may have implemented into the multisystem kernel to get it to work. looks like @kairi_zeroblade is focusing on marshmallow though which should be awesome! Can't wait for us to get the update
I just re downloaded emotion kernel and am going to try it for a little bit.. Strange thing is, my battery percent jumped from 20 to 42 after reboot.. I will have to see how it goes..
Sent from my SM-N920F using Tapatalk
I second the Eceed kernel. Im on the jasmine rom and was using the emotion kernel but I noticed a fast drain on the battery. Switched over to Eceed a few days ago and have experienced a huge improvement on battery life, without the sacrifice in speed. Thanks Joemill for the suggestion.
Read about Exceed kernel so I gave it a try and thats the one Im sticking with. Runs great,using Jasmine Rom with it as well,battery life is great and my phone is very quick,highly recommend it.
Wich ROM, mod, kernel or combination of two of them give me the best experience in android?? I m looking for an Android system fast, smooth and best battery life. Thanks to all
If something was the best, nothing else would be used as there's no point in using something that's inferior when you can get something better.
There is no best, I suggest you read each thread and pick one that suits your needs. Saying X ROM and kernel is the best is like saying a specific vehicle is the best...One may say a Ferrari and another may say an F-350. But who's right?
Some people like roms and kernels bloated with 1000 customization options filled with placebo "optimization and enhancements". Others prefer a clean, minimal ROM without all the useless bling that they'll never use.
P.S. there's probably 10 threads like these, and possibly 11 by next week that you could've read through. I'll just copy and paste this same post on the next one.
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Currently using PureNexus nougat with ElementalX kernel. The experience is pretty good.
Using the phone for SMS/MMS, YouTube and web browsing. I can get ~ 5/6h sot with a full charge on WiFi and ~ 3h30 sot on 3g/LTE which is enough for me.
Also using custom CPU governor profile in EXKernel Manager helped me with battery life without affecting performance (at least not that I noticed). You can find more infos here:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6p/general/guide-advanced-interactive-governor-t3290605
Hope that helps
I am using the stock ROM with the ElementalX Kernel. Very happy with the performance of the phone. I arrive at the end of the day with 40% battery on average
yamilmanzur said:
I am using the stock ROM with the ElementalX Kernel. Very happy with the performance of the phone. I arrive at the end of the day with 40% battery on average
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wich version of stock are using?? I was use that option but I had some issue with stock.
5.1 said:
Currently using PureNexus nougat with ElementalX kernel. The experience is pretty good.
Using the phone for SMS/MMS, YouTube and web browsing. I can get ~ 5/6h sot with a full charge on WiFi and ~ 3h30 sot on 3g/LTE which is enough for me.
Also using custom CPU governor profile in EXKernel Manager helped me with battery life without affecting performance (at least not that I noticed). You can find more infos here:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/nexus-6p/general/guide-advanced-interactive-governor-t3290605
Hope that helps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your answer. I had a boot loop when I install pure Nexus, Gapps, ElementalX and super su. But I like this option. Wich Gapps recommend?
hpagliettini said:
Wich version of stock are using?? I was use that option but I had some issue with stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
7.1.1 ROM stock
hpagliettini said:
Thanks for your answer. I had a boot loop when I install pure Nexus, Gapps, ElementalX and super su. But I like this option. Wich Gapps recommend?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi. Gapps included in the OP of thePureNexus thread. OenGapps will work too.
Another "best rom" thread? Seriously ?
Pure
F2FS + Dark ROM + FLASH kernel ! That's the best combination and I am a serial flasher
These people that are saying there isn't a best ROM, I don't really understand the reasoning behind this. There most certainly is a best ROM kernel combination. Otherwise all these ROMs and kernels would be exactly the same right? Sorry to say, some are better than others. This is just a fact.
If you want speed, smoothness, glass, breakneck speeds, great battery life, there really is one only choice.
Uber rom by Chad and faster kernel by Chad.
Why?
On f2fs, (trust me, you want f2fs) I have yet to find kernel or ROM combination that beats this.
Its the only rom that's built with GCC 6.3.1, and the only rom built with clang 3.9.1. Coupled with f2fs, this rom FLIES.
I have flashed every single ROM on this forum and then some, and I'm telling you this is the best combination you can possibly hope for:
https://temp.bbqdroid.org
NOTilyass said:
F2FS + Dark ROM + FLASH kernel ! That's the best combination and I am a serial flasher
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How much sot do you have with this combination?
You flash f2fs + dark ROM + Gapps + flash kernel in one time?
TrainNanpaMaster said:
These people that are saying there isn't a best ROM, I don't really understand the reasoning behind this. There most certainly is a best ROM kernel combination. Otherwise all these ROMs and kernels would be exactly the same right? Sorry to say, some are better than others. This is just a fact.
If you want speed, smoothness, glass, breakneck speeds, great battery life, there really is one only choice.
Uber rom by Chad and faster kernel by Chad.
Why?
On f2fs, (trust me, you want f2fs) I have yet to find kernel or ROM combination that beats this.
Its the only rom that's built with GCC 6.3.1, and the only rom built with clang 3.9.1. Coupled with f2fs, this rom FLIES.
I have flashed every single ROM on this forum and then some, and I'm telling you this is the best combination you can possibly hope for:
https://temp.bbqdroid.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uber rom by Chad I definitely agree is the best. I tried using his faster angler but it caused problems with mods like viper4arise so I am sticking with flash kernel. Uber by Chad is definitely the best rom though and I have tried so many roms like pure nexus, resurrection remix, dirty unicorns, sixRom, lineage, cyanogenmod, nitrogen, Cortex and so many more.
Is the stock camera working on either Uber or Dark ROM with f2fs file system?
Thanks
There's no such thing as a best rom fact, but only best rom opinions, which isn't a good idea to ever discuss here. [emoji14]
As for battery, that all depends on you as a user to manager your battery life your way. I get 4+ SOT easily and I listen to a lot of music and text a lot.
As for what I'm using, I'm running ABC Rom with franco.kernel, root, and V4A. ?
Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
TrainNanpaMaster said:
These people that are saying there isn't a best ROM, I don't really understand the reasoning behind this. There most certainly is a best ROM kernel combination. Otherwise all these ROMs and kernels would be exactly the same right? Sorry to say, some are better than others. This is just a fact.
If you want speed, smoothness, glass, breakneck speeds, great battery life, there really is one only choice.
Uber rom by Chad and faster kernel by Chad.
Why?
On f2fs, (trust me, you want f2fs) I have yet to find kernel or ROM combination that beats this.
Its the only rom that's built with GCC 6.3.1, and the only rom built with clang 3.9.1. Coupled with f2fs, this rom FLIES.
I have flashed every single ROM on this forum and then some, and I'm telling you this is the best combination you can possibly hope for:
https://temp.bbqdroid.org
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In this link I download the Uber ROM, right?
And other thing, you say me I have to flash to f2fs first before install this ROM and kernel?? Or I don't have to flash previous?
DEVILOPS 007 said:
Uber rom by Chad I definitely agree is the best. I tried using his faster angler but it caused problems with mods like viper4arise so I am sticking with flash kernel. Uber by Chad is definitely the best rom though and I have tried so many roms like pure nexus, resurrection remix, dirty unicorns, sixRom, lineage, cyanogenmod, nitrogen, Cortex and so many more.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using faster kernel (r63) with Viper for arise with no problems at all bro. What's your steps for flashing?
I'm using 2.4 alpha B.
TrainNanpaMaster said:
I'm using faster kernel (r63) with Viper for arise with no problems at all bro. What's your steps for flashing?
I'm using 2.4 alpha B.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I basically just wiped cache and dalvik/art cache and flashed the rom and kernel and all my mods. I also made sure to do stuff like rename audio effects and everything I did to make it work with flash. I use stable 2.4 deutronomy aroma installer. I was talking to someone else on this rom and kernel and he said he had the same problem too so it might be hit and miss or maybe you flashed it different than us. Please tell.me what you did to get it to work. Thanks
What partitions do you guys convert to f2s besides cache? Data as well? Everything else remains ext4?
Running stock has been great for me lately. Downgraded to 6.0.1 running Xposed for pixel mods. Amplify and greenify. With exkernel has been a great experience so far. Near 7h SOT yesterday. Will be going back to 7.1.1 soon, as the February update is out.. I heard lineage OS has good battery life. Will be trying that out soon in a few days.
Read the threads on XDA and good luck!!:good:
We have another post for ROM. Why do we not have another post for Kernel ?
As we can see, we have more than 5 kernels that are from XDA developer or someone else. But which one is really good for your ROM and which one still keep updating ?
I have been using OP5T for 2 months. Have used so many kernels but i still got stuck in those and do not know which is more stable. I am planning to use the kernel from Blu_Spark. Is that good ?
Post your favourite kernel and tell everybody why you use that. It will help newbie to pick what they want.
I am using Flash kernel at the moment but I have already tried Blu, franko, arter, ElementalX etc, but honestly for me it's difficult to see any difference since this phone have already a great battery life and great speed. On my previous phone (S8) the custom kernel gives a big advantage since the phone have tons of bloat and and isn't running stock like Android.
vvt4994 said:
We have another post for ROM. Why do we not have another post for Kernel ?
As we can see, we have more than 5 kernels that are from XDA developer or someone else. But which one is really good for your ROM and which one still keep updating ?
I have been using OP5T for 2 months. Have used so many kernels but i still got stuck in those and do not know which is more stable. I am planning to use the kernel from Blu_Spark. Is that good ?
Post your favourite kernel and tell everybody why you use that. It will help newbie to pick what they want.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried Blu and Franco for now and both have been very good. I really think kernel performance depends on the combo with the ROM as well as your device. I'm on Liquid Remix with Franco currently but I may give Resurrection Remix a try with Flash. If I had more time, I'd flash every ROM with every kernel to get a feel for all the possibilities LOL. :good:
For me Franco and flash kernel are the Best.... Now with ob3 with Franco kernel
Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5010 mediante Tapatalk
Did the Franco improve battery or performance? Someone Tried the Boeffla?
At the moment, both Flash Kernel and RenderKernel are great options in my opinion. I have tried most of the other kernels on xda and if you are looking specifically for smoothness/speed, these are the two you should test first. I do not run battery cycles; everyones daily use scenario really differs too much.
Flash Kernel currently has some kernel features I need (Kcal support & wakelock blocker) while RenderKernel does not have these features quite yet. While it lacks in some features, RenderKernel is undoubtedly the smoothest kernel for 5T right now.
I am on a 5T with OOS 5.0.3.
I like Franco but recently some custom ROMs have WIFI cannot turn on problem after I flash Franco kernel.
:fingers-crossed:
(Don't blame any devs here just sharing.)
crashazz33 said:
At the moment, both Flash Kernel and RenderKernel are great options in my opinion. I have tried most of the other kernels on xda and if you are looking specifically for smoothness/speed, these are the two you should test first. I do not run battery cycles; everyones daily use scenario really differs too much.
Flash Kernel currently has some kernel features I need (Kcal support & wakelock blocker) while RenderKernel does not have these features quite yet. While it lacks in some features, RenderKernel is undoubtedly the smoothest kernel for 5T right now.
I am on a 5T with OOS 5.0.3.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where can I download flash kernel?
mo123456789 said:
Where can I download flash kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-5t/development/op5t-flash-kernel-v2-15-1-t3729330/page34
I haven't really played around with Kernel choices much.
I use and appreciate the professionalism of ElementalX kernel.
With it's options to adjust for extreme brightness, it quickly became a favorite a couple years ago and I've just stuck with it since.
Now most devs are adding high brightness to their kernels.
I guess I can start checking other kernels out.
I do like that ElementalX stays very stockish, reliable.
I can pretty much flash it and feel confident nothing weird will pop up over the next few days.
CZ Eddie said:
I haven't really played around with Kernel choices much.
I use and appreciate the professionalism of ElementalX kernel.
With it's options to adjust for extreme brightness, it quickly became a favorite a couple years ago and I've just stuck with it since.
Now most devs are adding high brightness to their kernels.
I guess I can start checking other kernels out.
I do like that ElementalX stays very stockish, reliable.
I can pretty much flash it and feel confident nothing weird will pop up over the next few days.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ElementalX, Franco, and flash were all my go-to kernels back in the 6p days (just a few months ago, lol), so it's hard to pick, especially since they all ended up on the 5t. Right now I'm on exkernel though I am partial to flash. Battery life is amazing on all 3, but the overclock on ex just adds that extra bit of smoothness that I've never experienced before. Call it placebo but I just love this kernel (exkernel).
any more input?
im curious to know if fsync affects battery performance at all, can someone also test this out if you are on a kernel that enables disabling the fsync feature
virtyx said:
any more input?
im curious to know if fsync affects battery performance at all, can someone also test this out if you are on a kernel that enables disabling the fsync feature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried it but didn't notice any difference.
Technically it should improve performance when using the phone, but it won't be noticeable.
boeffla
simple and steady, close to stock for daily using.
blu_spark, always on the Fastlane. ?
Does flashing a custom kernel solves Google play services battery drain?
Do I need custom recovery and root to flash a custom kernel? I'm not willing to play with kernel adiutor so I'm not really interested in rooting
luws said:
Does flashing a custom kernel solves Google play services battery drain?
Do I need custom recovery and root to flash a custom kernel? I'm not willing to play with kernel adiutor so I'm not really interested in rooting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Custom kernel has nothing to do with google play services. You need custom recovery to flash a kernel, but most kernels for op5t are "flash & forget" which mean there is no reason to change the setting of the kernel.
Sent from my ONEPLUS 5T
vagkoun83 said:
Custom kernel has nothing to do with google play services. You need custom recovery to flash a kernel, but most kernels for op5t are "flash & forget" which mean there is no reason to change the setting of the kernel.
Sent from my ONEPLUS 5T
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maybe not Google play services specifically, but with my latest phone (zuk z2), kernel was directly related to deep sleep
stock OOS/kernel has a serious issue with Google PS in terms of deep sleep. Besides that, I dont feel any need to flash a custom kernel. SOT is incredible already, and performance is really fluid.
luws said:
maybe not Google play services specifically, but with my latest phone (zuk z2), kernel was directly related to deep sleep
stock OOS/kernel has a serious issue with Google PS in terms of deep sleep. Besides that, I dont feel any need to flash a custom kernel. SOT is incredible already, and performance is really fluid.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are OK then there is no need to flash a kernel. If an app is crap (like Google services or facebook) the kernel can't do miracles and its not kernels job to control wakelocks of user apps
Sent from my ONEPLUS 5T
I keep changing between blu and new kernel
Not sure which to stick with but I think new kernel gives me a bit more battery