Related
I was wondering about the overclocking kernal for cm7. just how do i put it in. Do I have to do that when I first install or can I add it later. also does it really help. I mean is the difference really noticeable or not at all. I am still deciding if I should do it or not.
Kernels are flashed through ClockworkMod and can be flash anytime after you flash a rom. If you use the search bar you can easily find what particular kernel works for your setup.
OK, I think I found the right one but I was also wondering if I could install it when I first installed cm7. When I installed it I saw that it was searching for the kernel and for gapps but didn't find the n and skipped it. Could I install it then
chad11 said:
OK, I think I found the right one but I was also wondering if I could install it when I first installed cm7. When I installed it I saw that it was searching for the kernel and for gapps but didn't find the n and skipped it. Could I install it then
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7 has the ability to be overclocked as it sets.
settings > CM settings > performance > CPU settings.
just be extremely careful when Overclocking devices. it can takes it's toll in the long run.
and the g/apps are not kernel dependent they are ROM dependent.
OK but what do you mean by gapps are not kernal dependant
chad11 said:
OK but what do you mean by gapps are not kernal dependant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On *UNIX based devices. They have a section of the firmware called the "kernel". The kernel accepts the coding, binary and scripts from the RAM/ROM and tells the hardware how to act, what to do, and when to do it.
The g/apps have nothing to do with the kernel.
The g/apps are Google's property and cannot be included in AOSP based ROMs. Those ROMs are developed from Google's code. And developers do not have the ability to add those at will. So we must flash them after/prior (depending on he ROM) to get the Google Apps.
YES! DO IT!
for me its like day and night, it so much smoother with dals OC kernel. and yes you can flash the OC kernel any time. you can flash cm7 rc1 then OC kernel in the same boot. or you can first install cm7 to check it out for a while and then later flash the new kernel. if you planning to flash dal's 6/18 kernel, make sure to get his app NC Tweaks.
NC Tweaks here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1104039
Dal's Kernel here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=925451
thanks. What I want to know is how to flash it. do I do it the same way as gapps( have wifi and reboot in recovery mode) or is there a different way?
chad11 said:
thanks. What I want to know is how to flash it. do I do it the same way as gapps( have wifi and reboot in recovery mode) or is there a different way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You place the over clock zip file in the root of your sd card and flash it through cwm like you would a rom or gapps. So for example you would flash cm7 then gapps then the overclock kernel.
Not to Jack this thread, but I want to update from cm7 old kernel to New nightly build. Does the new kernel flash with the nightly?
Sent from my Optimized Shift using XDA App
JeramyEggs said:
Not to Jack this thread, but I want to update from cm7 old kernel to New nightly build. Does the new kernel flash with the nightly?
Sent from my Optimized Shift using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When you move from stable cm7 to cm7 nightly the new kernel is included. However the included kernel is overclockable only to 975mhz. If you want a higher clock speed you'll have to use dals 6182011 kernel, up to 1200mhz.
whats is cmw?
chad11 said:
whats is cmw?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
it's actually CWM.
ClockWork Manager
basically boot into recovery then flash.
OK. but this may be a stupid question but will the cm7 kernal work with the stable version7.0.3 because that is what I have.
chad11 said:
OK. but this may be a stupid question but will the cm7 kernel work with the stable version7.0.3 because that is what I have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not following you cannot use just a Cyanogen(mod) kernel. They are built into their ROMs.
chad11 said:
OK. but this may be a stupid question but will the cm7 kernal work with the stable version7.0.3 because that is what I have.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry, but no. dal's 6/18 OC kernel will not work with 7.0.3....
...just flash n118 and you'll be fine
Ok thanks anyway. do you know when the kernal will work with a stable version
chad11 said:
Ok thanks anyway. do you know when the kernal will work with a stable version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The latest nightly should be considered stable. It is in release candidate stable for the next stable build. The next stable build should be released in the next couple of days.
neidlinger said:
it's actually CWM.
ClockWork Manager
basically boot into recovery then flash.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No--It's- Clock Work Mod Recovery
CWMR ;^}
Jimbo67 said:
No--It's- Clock Work Mod Recovery
CWMR ;^}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a Clockwork ROM Manager and a ClockworkMod Recovery image.
Together they are known as "CWM" Since one is a recovery and the other is a ROM manager.
I'm curious what everyone thinks the best Recovery is for the Razr M and what are the best kernels as far as functionality, battery life, and speed.
I haven't played around with installing custom kernels and ive been using the CWM recovery on my razr m and im currently running the AOKP custom ROM.
Dead Calm, arghhh kernel
Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk 4
I think cwm is better than twrp but I am prejudiced by having wiped my extSD in one of the newest versions. See my signature link for an older BETTER version.
I like TWRP 2.6.0 and I had been having great performance with Carbon ROM 1.8 running the arrrghhh kernel. Currently though I'm having issues running arrrghhh kernel with the Carbon ROM 4.3 nightly (runs smooth with the provided kernel) and yes I did use the CM 10.2 version. I'm sure this will sort it's self after a few more updates.
***edit***
as of 8/16/2013 the arrrghhh kernel and carbon rom nightlies now work together properly
Brucifer5150 said:
I like TWRP 2.6.0 and I had been having great performance with Carbon ROM 1.8 running the arrrghhh kernel. Currently though I'm having issues running arrrghhh kernel with the Carbon ROM 4.3 nightly (runs smooth with the provided kernel) and yes I did use the CM 10.2 version. I'm sure this will sort it's self after a few more updates.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what benefits come with using the arrrghhh kernel and is there a thread on here that i cant find? lol
jb14813 said:
what benefits come with using the arrrghhh kernel and is there a thread on here that i cant find? lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Over/Underclocking and more governor options you can read about it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1893050
Brucifer5150 said:
Over/Underclocking and more governor options you can read about it here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1893050
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When installing a custom kernal, do i have to take any special steps such as wipe dalvic etc..? Or simply just flash zip from cwrm?
Making a backup and wiping cache and dalvik are always a good idea.
Which kernels do ppl use for AOSP ROMS? I have obly come across Samsung kernels so far and if I make the jump to AOSP I wanted to make sure I had a selection to choose from!
I'm using and am satisfied with the Chronic Kernel c:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2284252
CountParadox said:
I'm using and am satisfied with the Chronic Kernel c:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2284252
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice one and what ROM do you use with that, will it work with 4.3?
Milamber said:
Nice one and what ROM do you use with that, will it work with 4.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
PACman ROM 4.3 compiled by Vertigo, It says alpha but its pretty damn stable xD
Im also using the latest Phillz Recovery that came out yesterday or so. Compatible with 4.3
>PAC http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2295673
CountParadox said:
PACman ROM 4.3 compiled by Vertigo, It says alpha but its pretty damn stable xD
Im also using the latest Phillz Recovery that came out yesterday or so. Compatible with 4.3
>PAC http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2295673
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll try that then! I love CM to be honest
does this also work on a sprint based S4
CountParadox said:
PACman ROM 4.3 compiled by Vertigo, It says alpha but its pretty damn stable xD
Im also using the latest Phillz Recovery that came out yesterday or so. Compatible with 4.3
>PAC http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2295673
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have a S4 model SPH-L720
will that rom allow me to hide my data stream while wifi tethered to laptop from sprint
i'm using the KT-kernel + p.a.c alpha 4.3, pretty stable and nice battery once configured
Milamber said:
Which kernels do ppl use for AOSP ROMS? I have obly come across Samsung kernels so far and if I make the jump to AOSP I wanted to make sure I had a selection to choose from!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's wrong with the stock kernel? Stock CM10.2 is very smooth and fast.
Using KT as I wanted to try UC and UV but it's not smoother or anywthing
Pfeffernuss said:
What's wrong with the stock kernel? Stock CM10.2 is very smooth and fast.
Using KT as I wanted to try UC and UV but it's not smoother or anywthing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is nothing wrong with the stock kernel, I like options...
Pfeffernuss said:
What's wrong with the stock kernel? Stock CM10.2 is very smooth and fast.
Using KT as I wanted to try UC and UV but it's not smoother or anywthing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
true, cm kernel is pretty smooth, but with others you have a lot of option like more governor , io scheduler ,oc ,uv ecc
kt not smoother? rofl maybe wrong configuration
I have PA 3.99 4.3 jellybean.
zertix said:
I have PA 3.99 4.3 jellybean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash a kernel that supports overclocking.
Use a kernel that supports overclocking, such as Faux kernel, Trinity, Neo and etc. After flashing the kernel, use an app to change the frequencies and such. I use tricksters mod + Trinity kernel. Hope this helped
Ok perfect. Anybody can pass me the right kernel for my rom ?
zertix said:
Ok perfect. Anybody can pass me the right kernel for my rom ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
there is no right kernel, thats for you to decide. every device will react differently, and you will use your device completely differently than anybody else, so only you will have the right answer. try them all
Are they still going the CAF route? Or is that ending since it mainly had to do with freezes (if I recall) in 4.3?
It's going to affect my decision to go back to 10.1. I really want to have touch2wake on my kernel and these fixes to make faux and franco kernels function are starting to cause issues on 10.2.
AFAIK, these developers will not be supporting CAF =/
Elegant996 said:
Are they still going the CAF route? Or is that ending since it mainly had to do with freezes (if I recall) in 4.3?
It's going to affect my decision to go back to 10.1. I really want to have touch2wake on my kernel and these fixes to make faux and franco kernels function are starting to cause issues on 10.2.
AFAIK, these developers will not be supporting CAF =/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
freezes on 4.3 was due to bug in aosp jss code, witch have been fixed in 4.3.1. so update to lastest cm.
and in 4.4 they will continue.
Yeah, I'm running the stable release of 10.2 with ziddley's franco kernel and it's causing issues here and there now. I was hoping they were going to revert back to AOSP. I guess I'll revert back to 10.1 to maintain my desired functionality for now.
Elegant996 said:
Yeah, I'm running the stable release of 10.2 with ziddley's franco kernel and it's causing issues here and there now. I was hoping they were going to revert back to AOSP. I guess I'll revert back to 10.1 to maintain my desired functionality for now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahh u using custom kernel, not cm one.no issue while i was on cm 10.2 with my modified build of franco.kernel
opssemnik said:
ahh u using custom kernel, not cm one.no issue while i was on cm 10.2 with my modified build of franco.kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, unless there's some way to get touch2wake working on 10.2; I heard you have gamma settings now with the caf kernel included so I figure I can maintain my color scheme.
Elegant996 said:
Yeah, unless there's some way to get touch2wake working on 10.2; I heard you have gamma settings now with the caf kernel included so I figure I can maintain my color scheme.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
try with other kernels.
On CM11 and Cm10.2 try these: 1) Modified franco and faux to work on Cm : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2487246
2) AK has CM exclusive kernel : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2473454
opssemnik said:
ahh u using custom kernel, not cm one.no issue while i was on cm 10.2 with my modified build of franco.kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can always follow a tutorial to build your own cm from source code and enable module support. In that way you won't be using custom kernels, everything will be cm 100%.
I am using touchcontrol in that way, and I'm quite happy with the results.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
CM11 is great with hells-core. Touch control works, and battery/performance is amazing.
korockinout13 said:
CM11 is great with hells-core. Touch control works, and battery/performance is amazing.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have been trying to find a link for 15 minutes!
Could you provide me with a link?
Thanks!
myweca said:
I have been trying to find a link for 15 minutes!
Could you provide me with a link?
Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right in the general section: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2495373