Database Users

Android 4.0.4

http://www.xda-developers.com/android/4-0-4-hits-aosp-eight-month-cycle-begins-but-not-for-us/
Just when 4.0.3 drops, we are old news again lol

yeah saw that but im sure we will get it at some point or should i hope
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using XDA Premium HD app

I saw that this afternoon too. But in the Engadget article he says they are pushing out to the git repos. What I found interesting was that Xoom got a taste of 4.0.4 today.
http://m.engadget.com/default/class...n-this-time-over-at-aosp/&icid=eng_latest_art

I was just about this post this! If xoom gets an update i am sure we tf101 users will also get one. Also Asus is still debugging the random reboots if we may believe grag

I thought part of the point of using version control systems and such (like git) was that it makes source updates quicker and easier to merge into existing stuff?
Will it be a lengthy process for existing AOSP ROMs to be updated to 4.0.4? I'm trying to avoid asking for an ETA, just wanna know, in the scheme of things, how much (or little) trouble it's going to be for those lovely devs.

if you are running AOKP then you shall have an update soon.

I'm new to android what is AOSP and AOKP?

Just updated my rom
Look at my signature

ricardopvz said:
Just updated my rom
Look at my signature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice, any significant improvements over 4.0.3?

Also team EOS Nightly 17 have the 4.0.4.
Does someone try it?
ricardopvz said:
Just updated my rom
Look at my signature
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Android Open Source Project and Android Open Kang Project if I am not mistaken.
beckywc said:
I'm new to android what is AOSP and AOKP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Who cares what Asus delivers at this point? We have AOKP now, and that is a million times better.
I'm sure we will have 4.0.4 via AOKP within a week. I already have it on my Galaxy Nexus
(PS: Remember to donate)
---------- Post added at 09:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 PM ----------
Goatshocker said:
Nice, any significant improvements over 4.0.3?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
On my Galaxy Nexus there is a world of difference between former 4.0.3-based AOKP build and the current 4.0.4-based build. A. world. of. difference. Performance and smoothness is maddening.
Deep inside I know I'm being overly optimistic, but if we can any sort of improvement like that on our TF101s as well, I wont regret not waiting for the prime

josteink said:
Who cares what Asus delivers at this point? We have AOKP now, and that is a million times better.
I'm sure we will have 4.0.4 via AOKP within a week. I already have it on my Galaxy Nexus
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A week? We just have 4.0.4.
Here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1525148
and here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1520764

rickyt63 said:
A week? We just have 4.0.4.
Here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1525148
and here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1520764
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure sure. But im interested in the AOKP build which was still on 4.0.3 when I checked an hour ago
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk

josteink said:
Sure sure. But im interested in the AOKP build which was still on 4.0.3 when I checked an hour ago
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its coming. The latest version of aokp, build 29 is already on 4.0.4. Galaxy nexus aokp has it already. Other devices will come shortly as some bugs still need to be worked out
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium

Can anyone confirm or deny that the reboot problems have been fixed in 4.0.4?

Sanderfox said:
Can anyone confirm or deny that the reboot problems have been fixed in 4.0.4?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What reboot problems? ASUS have not released official 4.0.4.
4.0.4 is in AOSP repo so only custom ROMs for TF101 will have 4.0.4 until ASUS releases a OTA.

zephiK said:
What reboot problems? ASUS have not released official 4.0.4.
4.0.4 is in AOSP repo so only custom ROMs for TF101 will have 4.0.4 until ASUS releases a OTA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, my mistake. You are right.

zephiK said:
Its coming. The latest version of aokp, build 29 is already on 4.0.4. Galaxy nexus aokp has it already. Other devices will come shortly as some bugs still need to be worked out
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know I know. Like I said: I'm running it on my Nexus (updated that first) and there is a world of difference in performance between that and the former build.
Hoping for the same for my TF101

Well, i've been testing CM9 4.0.4 build for a day now, and i can't really tell the diference.
Even ran some benchs and the performance is about the same.
No reboots, but i never had then with CM9.
Maybe still work to be done.

[Q] Chinese i9220 (n7000) 4.0.4 Released. Safe Kernel?

The Chinese i9220 (same as n7000) has recieved an update versioned as ZCLPJ. Is has been reported as a 4.0.4 ICS release. Does anyone have the idea whether this kernel has the emmc bug fixed?

Bumped...
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app

maxfu said:
The Chinese i9220 (same as n7000) has recieved an update versioned as ZCLPJ. Is has been reported as a 4.0.4 ICS release. Does anyone have the idea whether this kernel has the emmc bug fixed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No source code, no way to tell. Assume dangerous until there is source code for review.

強國果然係強! formal release or pre-release ??

unixwise said:
強國果然係強! formal release or pre-release ??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had updated my note to 4.04 via kies~

shinzi said:
I had updated my note to 4.04 via kies~
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? China's Notes already have official 4.0.4? You are lucky! Anyone know if the bug has been patched?

shinzi said:
i had updated my note to 4.04 via kies~:d
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
同志 是n7000還是i9220 ?

Yes, China i9220 have official 4.0.4 firmware! Checkfus say yes

ICS 4.0.4
Hi there,
Bought recently a Haipai i9220, it came with an ICS 4.0.4, Kernel 3.0.13 dated June 4th. Build number ALPS.ICS.MP.V1.11
Works pretty well. There is one mystery though, in the "About phone menu" there is no "Update Firmware" option. How come ?
jmc

unixwise said:
同志 是n7000還是i9220 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i9220.
4.0.4 for n7000 has not been released yet.
---------- Post added at 06:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 AM ----------
maxfu said:
The Chinese i9220 (same as n7000) has recieved an update versioned as ZCLPJ. Is has been reported as a 4.0.4 ICS release. Does anyone have the idea whether this kernel has the emmc bug fixed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I heard that a lot of Chinese says that ZCLPJ has resolved the emmc bug, however, there is no official confirmation from Samsung.

zddt2001 said:
i9220.
4.0.4 for n7000 has not been released yet.
---------- Post added at 06:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 06:05 AM ----------
I heard that a lot of Chinese says that ZCLPJ has resolved the emmc bug, however, there is no official confirmation from Samsung.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In germany there is also the 4.04 N7000XXLRG out,
via SamMobile.com it can easily be downoalded
but if it´s save???? Who knows?

not save !!!
It´s proven to be not save, what a pitty!
Look at Dr. Ketans post #392, #378 and #363
http://forum.xda-developers.com/show...764893&page=40
the brick bug is still alive under 4.0.4 :crying:

At this point - Since Samsung took a previously safe device (I9100) and endangered it with XWLPM and XXLQ5.
Until further notice, assume all future Samsung ICS kernels are unsafe.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk 2

Entropy512 said:
At this point - Since Samsung took a previously safe device (I9100) and endangered it with XWLPM and XXLQ5.
Until further notice, assume all future Samsung ICS kernels are unsafe.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heh well I guess in retrospect a lot of people with dead devices would have been able to answer this question.
Sent from my Samsung Galaxy SVII using Tapatalk 6 Beta

Android 4.2 for Xperia 2011

I recently heard that FXP will stop developing for the whole Xperia 2011 series, when just around the corner, Android 4.2 was standing with a bag of goodies, for which FXP has a valid reason, that these devices lack ram to support features of 4.2. I decided to build 4.2 from source for 2011 devices, for those who'd want to try out the latest version of android. I can handle compiling ROM. But need some help with kernel. if you can help out, or if you wanna be a part of the project. Leave a comment at this thread or PM me. After public release, Dev's can submit their patches / fixes for the ROM to that thread....
I do this because i don't want us to be stuck with stock based ROMs forever and because 4.2 looks awesome . All in all, Thankyou FXP for your work.

one thing that our xperia 2011 devices (especially neo/v ) lack is kernel developers ,we dont have linux 3.0 kernel which which would have made the user experience of JB 4.1 or 4.2 better , linux 3.0 supports many advanced features of JB ,but due to lack of these kernels our user experience will be incomplete , building & testing out these kernels will take hell of time and patience.
i hope this doesn't disappoint's any user or dev just a suggestion
linux 3.0 kernels would be awesome on our phones
i wish you all the best for taking such a great project

vimjam said:
one thing that our xperia 2011 devices (especially neo/v ) lack is kernel developers ,we dont have linux 3.0 kernel which which would have made the user experience of JB 4.1 or 4.2 better , linux 3.0 supports many advanced features of JB ,but due to lack of these kernels our user experience will be incomplete , building & testing out these kernels will take hell of time and patience.
i hope this doesn't disappoint's any user or dev just a suggestion
linux 3.0 kernels would be awesome on our phones
i wish you all the best for taking such a great project
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look here https://github.com/ExPeacer/CAF_android-msm-3.0/commits/master
progres stoped for 1 Month dont know what is problem , can you resume it ?
---------- Post added at 01:52 PM ---------- Previous post was at 01:46 PM ----------
emwno said:
I recently heard that FXP will stop developing for the whole Xperia 2011 series, when just around the corner, Android 4.2 was standing with a bag of goodies. I decided to build 4.2 from source for 2011 devices. I can handle compiling ROM. But need some help with kernel. if you can help out, or if you wanna be a part of the project. Leave a comment at this thread or PM me. After public release, Dev's can submit their patches / fixes for the ROM to that thread....
I do this because i don't want us to be stuck with stock based ROMs forever.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
officaly thay will stop at january 2013

Guys atleast try to make the linux kernel
I can be the tester of any Rom/kernel
If you want!
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app

XtremeSilencer said:
Guys atleast try to make the linux kernel
I can be the tester of any Rom/kernel
If you want!
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all andoid kernel are linux (andoid is based on linux )

I want to participate in, I am not a dev but I can test all ROM fast and give ideas

n1kolaa said:
all andoid kernel are linux (andoid is based on linux )
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I meant linux 3.0
Sent from my LT18i using xda app-developers app

I don't really need any testers if that's what your saying. I need people who can work, who can help me out.

emwno said:
I don't really need any testers if that's what your saying. I need people who can work, who can help me out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
then pm peaple like jader maxio fxp zackconsole pandemic ... i hope you accomplish this project!!

XtremeSilencer said:
then pm peaple like jader maxio fxp zackconsole pandemic ... i hope you accomplish this project!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. I'm not forcing any one to work on this
2. Jader, Maxio, pandemic are all greats devs but they build themes / stock, and I need help with kernel building
3. I was planning to ask FXP for some sources
4. Zack already has his hands full, look at his work.

+1

+1

emwno said:
1. I'm not forcing any one to work on this
2. Jader, Maxio, pandemic are all greats devs but they build themes / stock, and I need help with kernel building
3. I was planning to ask FXP for some sources
4. Zack already has his hands full, look at his work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hey. Why cant u ask nobodyatall. Aka naa. He has brought minicm10 to 2010 xperia Minis. Which is more stable than our cm10. I can help you with patches once you start compiling Rom. Cheers.
Sent from my MK16i using xda app-developers app

+1

+1
Sent from my Xperia Arc S using xda app-developers app

yeah the +1 counter thread

I would like to help, though I'm not of that much use YET.
Right now I'm mainly into developing apps, currently learning myself the basics of Kernel Development, I'm also capable of compiling Android.
Going to mess around a bit today, haven't compiled Android for my Xperia Pro yet.
Dympy.

Ok so.. Half way through compiling it failed, because of low storage or something. I read up online and found out that I need atleast 30gigs for compiling, where as I only have around 15-20 free on my laptop, lol unlucky I guess.. So project delayed - until I get more storage for my pc or if someone compiles for me if I give them the sources (if want 4.2 faster). And as for the kernel, instead of building a kernel (which may take long). I'll be modifying the current JB kernel for 4.2
~emwno

emwno said:
Ok so.. Half way through compiling it failed, because of low storage or something. I read up online and found out that I need atleast 30gigs for compiling, where as I only have around 15-20 free on my laptop, lol unlucky I guess.. So project delayed - until I get more storage for my pc or if someone compiles for me if I give them the sources (if want 4.2 faster). And as for the kernel, instead of building a kernel (which may take long). I'll be modifying the current JB kernel for 4.2
~emwno
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm almost done with re-setting up my Linux Install, it got wiped when I installed Windows 8 on my laptop..
Anyway, I have about 800GB of storage left, if you sent me a PM with some directions and such, I'll try to compile when the install is done.
Dympy.

emwno first dev to go for 4.2
you rock
+1 pleease

[ROM] [FIND5] [4.2.2] [cfX-Toolchain 4.8.y+] codefireXperiment

This new Android distribution treats development differently than any other.
CLICK HERE FOR THE ROM, THREAD, CHANGELOG, AND DISCUSSION.
A post detailing our team and new developers from TeamEOS can be found in the OP linked.
ntroducing codefireXperiment for your device! This OP is going to stay slim and bloat free, just like codefireXperiment. No marketing buzzwords either. We take such confidence in the speed and performance of this distribution, we challenge you to find a faster and more stable one!
Here's a bit of info you may want on this project for how we do things differently:
No features you don't need which slow the device down, or put your data at risk of being stolen. If you want to give it away, it should be your decision.
A fast and clean install with no UX decisions made for you. You make the ROM whatever you would like.
A team constantly exploring totally new feature sets and optimizations geared toward you, the user
We utilize a plethora of optimizations in a build system unlike any other:
Each build has a toolchain built for your device at the time of build. No more generic toolchain android builds.
Consistently updated upstream toolchain module source with our custom backports, fixes, and optimizations applied in a patch at build time.
Fully built utilizing Link Time Optimization (another custom ROM first). Feel free to google this one a bit to get an idea of the performance gain.
Many repositories have code fixes, cleanups, and many minor optimizations which are too generous to even speak of here.
Optimizations are toggled on and off based on device for the best experience we can acheive for your device without sacrificing any stability
Many Qcom optimizations and AOSP master (upstream) optimizations and fixes using device specifications to determine usage.
Fully built utilizing strict aliasing and isognu++11 mode.
Full "-O3" build. To those who don't know, this is the highest "optimization level" available in gcc that sets many other flags.
Enjoy, and thank you for choosing codefireXperiment
XDA:DevDB Information
[ROM] [AOSP] [4.2.2] [cfX-Toolchain 4.8.y+] codefireXperiment, ROM for the Oppo Find 5
Contributors
anders3408
ROM OS Version: 4.2.x Jelly Bean
ROM Kernel: Linux 3.4.x
Based On: AOSP
Version Information
Status: No Longer Updated
Current Stable Version: JDQ39E-20130
Stable Release Date: 2013-08-11
Created 2013-09-04
Last Updated 2014-08-18

Nice team you assembled there, looking forward to trying it out. openpdroid patches failed for me, oh well, gotta get more experience with xprivacy anyway.
BTW, didn't see it on your site so far, featurelist somewhere(espacially in terms of the kernel in use)?

any screenshot

S.D.Richards said:
BTW, didn't see it on your site so far, featurelist somewhere(espacially in terms of the kernel in use)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look at the Github link to the kernel source
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app

maxwen said:
look at the Github link to the kernel source
Sent from my HTC One X+ using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
https://github.com/codefireXperimen.../arch/arm/configs/cyanogenmod_find5_defconfig
Hard looking through that looking for pieces if you don't know the specific CONFIG_xxx name.
Anyway, in a quick scroll through, I fell over some enabled (=y) USB OTG stuff - I was under the impression the device doesn't support it?

Nightly is blazing fast. Quickest boot times ever. Even the first boot was super fast.
Sent from my Find 5 using xda app-developers app

Sorry to ask, I probably missed it somewhere... is this AOSP based, or other? Max's kernel is going on this bad boy if I try it... unless... it's already in there

no idea what this is, but i will flash it and take a look

Pure aosp based. For now not as many features as the other codefirex, but things are being added. Kernel is cm based with a few changes from maxwen and faux123, thanks both. Credits thread will come up.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app

charlatan01 said:
Sorry to ask, I probably missed it somewhere... is this AOSP based, or other? Max's kernel is going on this bad boy if I try it... unless... it's already in there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not tested maxwen kernel on it but you should be ready to reflash then, not totally sure it will work. Early tests did bootloop on maxwen kernels.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app

anders3408 said:
Not tested maxwen kernel on it but you should be ready to reflash then, not totally sure it will work. Early tests did bootloop on maxwen kernels.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks... I will hold off on flashing his kernel for the time being. It would be nice to get that working if possible.

charlatan01 said:
Thanks... I will hold off on flashing his kernel for the time being. It would be nice to get that working if possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just tested, you should be able to boot maxwen kernel on cfxe, at least it does with cfxe ramdisk
test it out and tell how it wents

I do have some random reboots after +-10 minutes with this ROM. Can I provide you a logcat Anders?

anders3408 said:
Just tested, you should be able to boot maxwen kernel on cfxe, at least it does with cfxe ramdisk
test it out and tell how it wents
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
need to take a look at your ramdisk
if something special is required I can provide prebuilts with your ramdisk
Sent from my Find 5 using xda app-developers app

mavaee said:
I do have some random reboots after +-10 minutes with this ROM. Can I provide you a logcat Anders?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
are you on the default kernel in this rom , and did a full wipe ?
Sure you can make a logcat , paste it via here
you can also submit a bug : here but please add log also
have not had a single random reboot at all, so its a bit wierd

anders3408 said:
are you on the default kernel in this rom , and did a full wipe ?
Sure you can make a logcat , paste it via here
you can also submit a bug : here but please add log also
have not had a single random reboot at all, so its a bit wierd
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I used the default kernel and coming from CM10.1 with a full wipe. I have to say I didn't experienced a reboot after all this afternoon so maybe it was just the ROM settling down.
---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ----------
Logcat:
http://logcat.scheffsblend.com/view?id=285002

mavaee said:
Yes I used the default kernel and coming from CM10.1 with a full wipe. I have to say I didn't experienced a reboot after all this afternoon so maybe it was just the ROM settling down.
---------- Post added at 04:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 04:18 PM ----------
Logcat:
http://logcat.scheffsblend.com/view?id=285002
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What happens when you made that logcat? I'm not seeing any reboots? Hopefully you won't see such reboot again.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app

Nice ROM.
Voice to text isn't functioning... I was going to try the app install from the Slim ROM site, but I know that doesn't work with the CM kernel. I know it works with Max's.
Anyway, other than that it's been stable for me. Wifi tethering worked, Battery seemed good for only running it 24 hrs or so.

charlatan01 said:
Nice ROM.
Voice to text isn't functioning... I was going to try the app install from the Slim ROM site, but I know that doesn't work with the CM kernel. I know it works with Max's.
Anyway, other than that it's been stable for me. Wifi tethering worked, Battery seemed good for only running it 24 hrs or so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its also using the CM's kernel. Can you send me a link to that app and I'll have a look.
Sent from my Find 5 using XDA Premium HD app

^ sure thing. Src install is found (thanks to the folks at Slim!) here

Android lollipop 5.0 aosp released!!

Hey everyone, couldnt find an announcement thread so I started one myself.
Android 5.0 Lollipop AOSP has just been released! Anyone who cant wait to get there hands on it here you go! Droid-Life was so kind to post links!
http://www.droid-life.com/2014/11/03/aosp-aosp-lollipop-time/

Now within 90 days CM will release Android 5.0 so we'll have to be patient for an official version otherwise beta builds should be out soon

and within days we will have a custom rom
---------- Post added at 10:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 AM ----------
Renosh said:
Now within 90 days CM will release Android 5.0 so we'll have to be patient for an official version otherwise beta builds should be out soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i actually don't agree with cm on that, htc Samsung taking 90days is legitimate because they have tons of devices to maintain, but one plus only has one to maintain, it should take less time

paarthdesai said:
and within days we will have a custom rom
---------- Post added at 10:30 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:29 AM ----------
i actually don't agree with cm on that, htc Samsung taking 90days is legitimate because they have tons of devices to maintain, but one plus only has one to maintain, it should take less time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right oneplus has one device, but its based on CyanogenMod but cm has to maintain as much devices as Samsung

90 days for cm12s release but much sooner for regular cm

Ok thats old news , op

henry0504 said:
Ok thats old news , op
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Explain how that's old news please, it's literally just been released for aosp.
Transmitted via Bacon

timmaaa said:
Explain how that's old news please, it's literally just been released for aosp.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do we have a working OPO device tree for lollipop though? I don't think so.
Sent from my OnePlusOne

timmaaa said:
Explain how that's old news please, it's literally just been released for aosp.
Transmitted via Bacon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Think he's saying that because it started rolling out last night (around 9 I think UK time?) and that people have been talking about it in the Development thread.
So I wouldn't say old news really but that's probably why he said it.

fjsferreira said:
Do we have a working OPO device tree for lollipop though? I don't think so.
Sent from my OnePlusOne
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No we don't, but what does that even have to do with my post that you quoted?
Transmitted via Bacon

Ok sorry for my confusing reply.... its because i have seen many posts about it so i think it is an old news. And i should not use old to describe it

fjsferreira said:
Do we have a working OPO device tree for lollipop though? I don't think so.
Sent from my OnePlusOne
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Apart from Nexus(es) and Google Editions, no phones have a device tree specific for lollipop.
But, considering I came from a device which sources never got released (Galaxy S Advance) and devs was still able to build (not to port, to build) up to 4.4.4, that shouldn't be a problem
Just don't be in a hurry, first rule of XDA is NO ETA.

The manifest is still missing, and lots of the code is still 4.4 kitkat code..
There's still some time to go.

I just pray that our beloved Dev s can keep it or stop it rather from looking like apple os L
Sent from my One A0001 using XDA Free mobile app

All that developers really have to do to port it to the OPO is to get the patches used in CM for the OPO and apply them to Lollipop. There may be some problems that will occur during the application of the patches, but that all can be fixed.
I'll be excited to see a port and to use it dual booting until OnePlus releases the firmware for the One.

I think we will get 5.0 this month, but not the CM version. I can remember that Oneplus posted a AOSP version for the One by themselves. So why shouldn't they publish a AOSP version of Lollipop?

alex1301 said:
I think we will get 5.0 this month, but not the CM version. I can remember that Oneplus posted a AOSP version for the One by themselves. So why shouldn't they publish a AOSP version of Lollipop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They may do that. But we will more likely get an unofficial build much sooner than official AOSP/CM12S.
CM12 Nightlis will also come long time before CM12S

alex1301 said:
I think we will get 5.0 this month, but not the CM version. I can remember that Oneplus posted a AOSP version for the One by themselves. So why shouldn't they publish a AOSP version of Lollipop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because their official ROM is CyanogenMod. If they will release an official AOSP 5.0 a lot of people will stop using CM11s and that would create a legal issue. It's not like Touchwiz for Samsung or Sense for HTC, the rom in the opo is not their intellectual property., they just have the right to use it.

where is that 5.0? cant see it ages

fjsferreira said:
Do we have a working OPO device tree for lollipop though? I don't think so.
Sent from my OnePlusOne
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@fjsferreira you got a One! I was with you when you had your OG!