I just noticed my slate ran a really low score on gfxbench 3.0 Trex test-its showing me 13.3 an screen and 8.5 off screen scores...Its supposed to be 30 and 18 if I am correct.In other benchmarks like 3dmark and antutu everything is normal.Does anyone know what can be the issue?Thanks.
Never mind I just rebooted and ran it again,now it shows normal rates.Does anyone know any graphics tests that run for a long time to check if the frames drop at some points?
Related
Yesterday I installed nenamark on my nexus one and ran my first benchmark, and I swear I got 30.1 fps. I specifically noted that it was spot on with movie frame rates.
Every subsequent test I've run I only get around 16fps. Perhaps 30 is way too high for the nexus one's hardware. But did I just imagine my original score or did I actually get that high? What's the highest score we've seen on the nexus one?
Why not just open it again and on the main screen it says what the highest recorded score it...
That'll tell you what your best score it. Also i maxed out on 16.2FPS :-/
Yeah my best run says 17 so I guess I imagined it. But I could have sworn I saw it. Oh well...
It was allllll just a dream ;p
Share your drugs
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
42.8 fps nenamark
Galaxy S Captivate
Couldn't using one of these newer kernels with updated GPU drivers be helping?
I got 17.5 fps. Not bad for a year old 1 GHz superphone
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
I just got a 22f p s yesterday if you believe it. Same exact kernel and all and it shows up in my high score at least.
My one is 22.3fps, without any tweaks, cleans e.t.c
Miui + wildmonks kernel.
16.4 on the N1 (CM 6.1.1), 36.5 on the galaxy tab
Edit: Remembered I'd underclocked my CPU, ramped it up to 1113Mhz and got 22.9fps. (Which I can't duplicate, can only hit 22.3fps now)
Tell you what, 22 isn't too bad considering this hardware.
My question is how does windows phone 7 devices, that all use the same CPU combo as the nexus one, get silky smooth scrolling thru the entire OS, including very large web pages etc. Do they just use that much better drivers? It definitely shows its possible and the potential.
I wonder if honeycomb runs slow. The highest quadrant standard score I can get is 2130. My atrix was averaging 2650.
My gtablet gets around 3600 with a hack. Xoom, 2200.
Sent from my HTC Vision using Tapatalk
I noticed that the benchmark hung at database writes and very low framerates for the first graphics test. I got 1907 overall...
jondwillis said:
I noticed that the benchmark hung at database writes and very low framerates for the first graphics test. I got 1907 overall...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exact same thing with me. Linpack is in the 30's though.
Could be quadrant is not honeycomb ready like it wasn't for gb till an update
www.redcardgreencard.com
I'm pretty sure that screen resolution is the culprit for the low scores. I ran smart bench and the results were basically double my Droid X. Only difference is in smart bench the graphics sections didn't scale for the screen.
Sent from my XOOM using Tapatalk
I know about the differences in benchmarks and how they arent set up for dual core, but I just ran smartbench 2011 and my gaming score is off by 1000 points on a stock xoom, I am rooted and running stock kernel. I am not sure why, maybe something is wrong with it.
My quadrant scores are lower than my dx but my linpack score is 64mflops! Don't know why our quadrant scores are so low but I'm having the same problem.
Sent from my Xoom using XDA App
Off from what? A phone? Synthetic benchmarks say almost nothing about real world performance, and they will always be different with devices at different resolutions.
A 1280x800 tablet will always score unusually low on a graphics benchmark that scales to resolution compared to a phone.
Usmc7356 said:
My quadrant scores are lower than my dx but my linpack score is 64mflops! Don't know why our quadrant scores are so low but I'm having the same problem.
Sent from my Xoom using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant also places a lot of weight on the filesystem, and my Xoom always hangs quite a while during database writes.
Also I think that getting ~6 FPS on their first 2D animation test can't help.
The Xoom is really zippy, take the benchmarks with many, many grains of salt.
I was just talking about smart bench, everything else is working fine, but the smartbench 2011 shows a galaxy s as being more powerful than my xoom, and the half the speed of a stock xoom. I am just wondering if other people were showing that they are below what a stock xoom should be too.
you have to make sure that these benchmarks are compatible with dual core processors. otherwise the results are moot.
I know that, but it is shows below the average xoom, thats the problem I am seeing, average xoom gets like 2k I get 1k
I was having the same issue, I believe it is because of spare parts for gaming full screen. I factory restored my xoom and scored higher than average. The benchmark ran on a much smaller screen when I ran it on a fresh xoom.
joepfalzgraf said:
I was having the same issue, I believe it is because of spare parts for gaming full screen. I factory restored my xoom and scored higher than average. The benchmark ran on a much smaller screen when I ran it on a fresh xoom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Confirmed that is it, thanks for this I guess I was overlooking it and thinking my xoom wasnt up to par.
Hi everyone,
I found something strange with my note, I have tried to do benchmarking with the Antutu 3 times consecutively and keep all the setting the same, 1st time i get around 67xx for the score (with 3D graphics get around 800), 2nd time get around 71xx (with 3D graphics get around 1100), 3rd time get around 65xx (with 3D graphics get only around 600)
Why there is such a big difference? The 3D graphics point is the main part which affect the total score, because all other points are almost the same in the 3 test.
What could I do to keep a more stable result of 3D graphics?
Thanks in advance!
Anyone could test and see if u got the same problem?
normally first run of any benchmark will always produce a weak score. this is because its buffering the data into the ram whilst running the benchmark.
second runs and thirds etc. will always score higher because the data is already loaded into the ram.
not too sure what happened with your third run. maybe you had something running in the background bugging it?
Hi there,
I recently bought a used v20 and found it to be really slow for a SD 820 device so today i ran Antutu and Geekbench and i'm getting like 73k in antutu and 1800 multicore in Geekbench.
That does not look right. Any suggestions?
I've searched around and no one else who thinks their phone is lagging did the benchmarks.
That doesn't sound right. Mine is running nice and smooth with no issues, did you purchase the phone from a carrier of 3rd party?
antutu average for this phone is around 130k i believe so your phone isnt working right
Your scores are really low.
I've just ran both tests and get the following results:
Antutu - 148346
Geekbench 4 - Multicore - 4061